Double checkmark symbol
up vote
6
down vote
favorite
How do I produce double checkmarks? Similar to this:
rlap{checkmark}checkmark
overlaps one on the other
stacking-symbols
New contributor
add a comment |
up vote
6
down vote
favorite
How do I produce double checkmarks? Similar to this:
rlap{checkmark}checkmark
overlaps one on the other
stacking-symbols
New contributor
add a comment |
up vote
6
down vote
favorite
up vote
6
down vote
favorite
How do I produce double checkmarks? Similar to this:
rlap{checkmark}checkmark
overlaps one on the other
stacking-symbols
New contributor
How do I produce double checkmarks? Similar to this:
rlap{checkmark}checkmark
overlaps one on the other
stacking-symbols
stacking-symbols
New contributor
New contributor
New contributor
asked 2 days ago
Rakshit Kothari
333
333
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
14
down vote
accepted
Rather than checkmark
from the amssymb package this symbols looks closure to checked
from wasysym. You can use:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{xcolor}
usepackage{wasysym}
newcommanddoublecheck{textcolor{blue}{checkedkern-0.6emchecked}}
begin{document}
doublecheck
end{document}
to produce:
Thank you for the answer, I've marked this as solved.
– Rakshit Kothari
2 days ago
@egreg Thanks. Fixed.
– Andrew
yesterday
add a comment |
up vote
8
down vote
Just for fun (meaning that @Andrew's answer is the one that should be accepted): a TikZy proposal.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{tikz}
tikzset{pics/.cd,
checkmark/.style={code={% starting point : https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/132790/121799
pgfgettransformentries{tmpxx}{tmp}{tmp}{tmp}{tmp}{tmp}
draw[line width=tmpxx*1pt,blue!80,fill=blue!60,line join=bevel] (0,.35) -- (.25,0) to[bend left=5] (0.8,.6) to[bend
right=5] (.25,.18) -- cycle;}}}
newcommand{doubleckmark}{begin{tikzpicture}[baseline={(0,0)}]
path (0,0) pic[scale=0.4]{checkmark} (0.12,0) pic[scale=0.4]{checkmark};
end{tikzpicture}}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}
pic{checkmark};
end{tikzpicture}
abc doubleckmark xyz
end{document}
2
+1 I vote for marmot's answer as it fulfills the two colour requirement
– Andrew
2 days ago
Nice, but the slope is not steep enough and the colours are not the same.
– AndréC
2 days ago
@AndréC Thanks! Yes, I know that this is not an exact match, but the OP says "similar to". Of course, if the OP gives me more feedback, I'll be happy to adjust the graphics.
– marmot
2 days ago
1
Thank you very much @marmot you gave me exactly what I needed. The slope and colors are minor details irrelevant to my needs.
– Rakshit Kothari
2 days ago
@Andrew I agree too and I vote positively.
– Sebastiano
yesterday
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
14
down vote
accepted
Rather than checkmark
from the amssymb package this symbols looks closure to checked
from wasysym. You can use:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{xcolor}
usepackage{wasysym}
newcommanddoublecheck{textcolor{blue}{checkedkern-0.6emchecked}}
begin{document}
doublecheck
end{document}
to produce:
Thank you for the answer, I've marked this as solved.
– Rakshit Kothari
2 days ago
@egreg Thanks. Fixed.
– Andrew
yesterday
add a comment |
up vote
14
down vote
accepted
Rather than checkmark
from the amssymb package this symbols looks closure to checked
from wasysym. You can use:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{xcolor}
usepackage{wasysym}
newcommanddoublecheck{textcolor{blue}{checkedkern-0.6emchecked}}
begin{document}
doublecheck
end{document}
to produce:
Thank you for the answer, I've marked this as solved.
– Rakshit Kothari
2 days ago
@egreg Thanks. Fixed.
– Andrew
yesterday
add a comment |
up vote
14
down vote
accepted
up vote
14
down vote
accepted
Rather than checkmark
from the amssymb package this symbols looks closure to checked
from wasysym. You can use:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{xcolor}
usepackage{wasysym}
newcommanddoublecheck{textcolor{blue}{checkedkern-0.6emchecked}}
begin{document}
doublecheck
end{document}
to produce:
Rather than checkmark
from the amssymb package this symbols looks closure to checked
from wasysym. You can use:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{xcolor}
usepackage{wasysym}
newcommanddoublecheck{textcolor{blue}{checkedkern-0.6emchecked}}
begin{document}
doublecheck
end{document}
to produce:
edited yesterday
answered 2 days ago
Andrew
29.6k34279
29.6k34279
Thank you for the answer, I've marked this as solved.
– Rakshit Kothari
2 days ago
@egreg Thanks. Fixed.
– Andrew
yesterday
add a comment |
Thank you for the answer, I've marked this as solved.
– Rakshit Kothari
2 days ago
@egreg Thanks. Fixed.
– Andrew
yesterday
Thank you for the answer, I've marked this as solved.
– Rakshit Kothari
2 days ago
Thank you for the answer, I've marked this as solved.
– Rakshit Kothari
2 days ago
@egreg Thanks. Fixed.
– Andrew
yesterday
@egreg Thanks. Fixed.
– Andrew
yesterday
add a comment |
up vote
8
down vote
Just for fun (meaning that @Andrew's answer is the one that should be accepted): a TikZy proposal.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{tikz}
tikzset{pics/.cd,
checkmark/.style={code={% starting point : https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/132790/121799
pgfgettransformentries{tmpxx}{tmp}{tmp}{tmp}{tmp}{tmp}
draw[line width=tmpxx*1pt,blue!80,fill=blue!60,line join=bevel] (0,.35) -- (.25,0) to[bend left=5] (0.8,.6) to[bend
right=5] (.25,.18) -- cycle;}}}
newcommand{doubleckmark}{begin{tikzpicture}[baseline={(0,0)}]
path (0,0) pic[scale=0.4]{checkmark} (0.12,0) pic[scale=0.4]{checkmark};
end{tikzpicture}}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}
pic{checkmark};
end{tikzpicture}
abc doubleckmark xyz
end{document}
2
+1 I vote for marmot's answer as it fulfills the two colour requirement
– Andrew
2 days ago
Nice, but the slope is not steep enough and the colours are not the same.
– AndréC
2 days ago
@AndréC Thanks! Yes, I know that this is not an exact match, but the OP says "similar to". Of course, if the OP gives me more feedback, I'll be happy to adjust the graphics.
– marmot
2 days ago
1
Thank you very much @marmot you gave me exactly what I needed. The slope and colors are minor details irrelevant to my needs.
– Rakshit Kothari
2 days ago
@Andrew I agree too and I vote positively.
– Sebastiano
yesterday
add a comment |
up vote
8
down vote
Just for fun (meaning that @Andrew's answer is the one that should be accepted): a TikZy proposal.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{tikz}
tikzset{pics/.cd,
checkmark/.style={code={% starting point : https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/132790/121799
pgfgettransformentries{tmpxx}{tmp}{tmp}{tmp}{tmp}{tmp}
draw[line width=tmpxx*1pt,blue!80,fill=blue!60,line join=bevel] (0,.35) -- (.25,0) to[bend left=5] (0.8,.6) to[bend
right=5] (.25,.18) -- cycle;}}}
newcommand{doubleckmark}{begin{tikzpicture}[baseline={(0,0)}]
path (0,0) pic[scale=0.4]{checkmark} (0.12,0) pic[scale=0.4]{checkmark};
end{tikzpicture}}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}
pic{checkmark};
end{tikzpicture}
abc doubleckmark xyz
end{document}
2
+1 I vote for marmot's answer as it fulfills the two colour requirement
– Andrew
2 days ago
Nice, but the slope is not steep enough and the colours are not the same.
– AndréC
2 days ago
@AndréC Thanks! Yes, I know that this is not an exact match, but the OP says "similar to". Of course, if the OP gives me more feedback, I'll be happy to adjust the graphics.
– marmot
2 days ago
1
Thank you very much @marmot you gave me exactly what I needed. The slope and colors are minor details irrelevant to my needs.
– Rakshit Kothari
2 days ago
@Andrew I agree too and I vote positively.
– Sebastiano
yesterday
add a comment |
up vote
8
down vote
up vote
8
down vote
Just for fun (meaning that @Andrew's answer is the one that should be accepted): a TikZy proposal.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{tikz}
tikzset{pics/.cd,
checkmark/.style={code={% starting point : https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/132790/121799
pgfgettransformentries{tmpxx}{tmp}{tmp}{tmp}{tmp}{tmp}
draw[line width=tmpxx*1pt,blue!80,fill=blue!60,line join=bevel] (0,.35) -- (.25,0) to[bend left=5] (0.8,.6) to[bend
right=5] (.25,.18) -- cycle;}}}
newcommand{doubleckmark}{begin{tikzpicture}[baseline={(0,0)}]
path (0,0) pic[scale=0.4]{checkmark} (0.12,0) pic[scale=0.4]{checkmark};
end{tikzpicture}}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}
pic{checkmark};
end{tikzpicture}
abc doubleckmark xyz
end{document}
Just for fun (meaning that @Andrew's answer is the one that should be accepted): a TikZy proposal.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{tikz}
tikzset{pics/.cd,
checkmark/.style={code={% starting point : https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/132790/121799
pgfgettransformentries{tmpxx}{tmp}{tmp}{tmp}{tmp}{tmp}
draw[line width=tmpxx*1pt,blue!80,fill=blue!60,line join=bevel] (0,.35) -- (.25,0) to[bend left=5] (0.8,.6) to[bend
right=5] (.25,.18) -- cycle;}}}
newcommand{doubleckmark}{begin{tikzpicture}[baseline={(0,0)}]
path (0,0) pic[scale=0.4]{checkmark} (0.12,0) pic[scale=0.4]{checkmark};
end{tikzpicture}}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}
pic{checkmark};
end{tikzpicture}
abc doubleckmark xyz
end{document}
answered 2 days ago
marmot
79k488166
79k488166
2
+1 I vote for marmot's answer as it fulfills the two colour requirement
– Andrew
2 days ago
Nice, but the slope is not steep enough and the colours are not the same.
– AndréC
2 days ago
@AndréC Thanks! Yes, I know that this is not an exact match, but the OP says "similar to". Of course, if the OP gives me more feedback, I'll be happy to adjust the graphics.
– marmot
2 days ago
1
Thank you very much @marmot you gave me exactly what I needed. The slope and colors are minor details irrelevant to my needs.
– Rakshit Kothari
2 days ago
@Andrew I agree too and I vote positively.
– Sebastiano
yesterday
add a comment |
2
+1 I vote for marmot's answer as it fulfills the two colour requirement
– Andrew
2 days ago
Nice, but the slope is not steep enough and the colours are not the same.
– AndréC
2 days ago
@AndréC Thanks! Yes, I know that this is not an exact match, but the OP says "similar to". Of course, if the OP gives me more feedback, I'll be happy to adjust the graphics.
– marmot
2 days ago
1
Thank you very much @marmot you gave me exactly what I needed. The slope and colors are minor details irrelevant to my needs.
– Rakshit Kothari
2 days ago
@Andrew I agree too and I vote positively.
– Sebastiano
yesterday
2
2
+1 I vote for marmot's answer as it fulfills the two colour requirement
– Andrew
2 days ago
+1 I vote for marmot's answer as it fulfills the two colour requirement
– Andrew
2 days ago
Nice, but the slope is not steep enough and the colours are not the same.
– AndréC
2 days ago
Nice, but the slope is not steep enough and the colours are not the same.
– AndréC
2 days ago
@AndréC Thanks! Yes, I know that this is not an exact match, but the OP says "similar to". Of course, if the OP gives me more feedback, I'll be happy to adjust the graphics.
– marmot
2 days ago
@AndréC Thanks! Yes, I know that this is not an exact match, but the OP says "similar to". Of course, if the OP gives me more feedback, I'll be happy to adjust the graphics.
– marmot
2 days ago
1
1
Thank you very much @marmot you gave me exactly what I needed. The slope and colors are minor details irrelevant to my needs.
– Rakshit Kothari
2 days ago
Thank you very much @marmot you gave me exactly what I needed. The slope and colors are minor details irrelevant to my needs.
– Rakshit Kothari
2 days ago
@Andrew I agree too and I vote positively.
– Sebastiano
yesterday
@Andrew I agree too and I vote positively.
– Sebastiano
yesterday
add a comment |
Rakshit Kothari is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Rakshit Kothari is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Rakshit Kothari is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Rakshit Kothari is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f461926%2fdouble-checkmark-symbol%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown