One-to-many output - Kinesis Firehouse Delivery Stream Transformation [on hold]
up vote
-5
down vote
favorite
It is evident in the AWS documentation that each record in the transformed output of a fire hose data transformation must match on a recordId corresponding to an input record.
Can multiple output records point to the same input recordId?
For example, suppose 10 records enter with unique ids, enter as input. Is it possible to output 20 records?
core-data
New contributor
put on hold as off-topic by t3chb0t, 200_success, Heslacher, πάντα ῥεῖ, Graipher 2 days ago
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave these specific reasons:
- "Authorship of code: Since Code Review is a community where programmers improve their skills through peer review, we require that the code be posted by an author or maintainer of the code, that the code be embedded directly, and that the poster know why the code is written the way it is." – 200_success, Graipher
- "Code not implemented or not working as intended: Code Review is a community where programmers peer-review your working code to address issues such as security, maintainability, performance, and scalability. We require that the code be working correctly, to the best of the author's knowledge, before proceeding with a review." – t3chb0t, Heslacher, πάντα ῥεῖ
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
add a comment |
up vote
-5
down vote
favorite
It is evident in the AWS documentation that each record in the transformed output of a fire hose data transformation must match on a recordId corresponding to an input record.
Can multiple output records point to the same input recordId?
For example, suppose 10 records enter with unique ids, enter as input. Is it possible to output 20 records?
core-data
New contributor
put on hold as off-topic by t3chb0t, 200_success, Heslacher, πάντα ῥεῖ, Graipher 2 days ago
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave these specific reasons:
- "Authorship of code: Since Code Review is a community where programmers improve their skills through peer review, we require that the code be posted by an author or maintainer of the code, that the code be embedded directly, and that the poster know why the code is written the way it is." – 200_success, Graipher
- "Code not implemented or not working as intended: Code Review is a community where programmers peer-review your working code to address issues such as security, maintainability, performance, and scalability. We require that the code be working correctly, to the best of the author's knowledge, before proceeding with a review." – t3chb0t, Heslacher, πάντα ῥεῖ
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
1
Hello and welcome to Code Review! I'm afraid our site is not well-suited for your question. We only answer questions about already-implemented code. Our help center provides more information about what is on-topic.
– Graham
2 days ago
add a comment |
up vote
-5
down vote
favorite
up vote
-5
down vote
favorite
It is evident in the AWS documentation that each record in the transformed output of a fire hose data transformation must match on a recordId corresponding to an input record.
Can multiple output records point to the same input recordId?
For example, suppose 10 records enter with unique ids, enter as input. Is it possible to output 20 records?
core-data
New contributor
It is evident in the AWS documentation that each record in the transformed output of a fire hose data transformation must match on a recordId corresponding to an input record.
Can multiple output records point to the same input recordId?
For example, suppose 10 records enter with unique ids, enter as input. Is it possible to output 20 records?
core-data
core-data
New contributor
New contributor
New contributor
asked Nov 18 at 7:25
efreezy
11
11
New contributor
New contributor
put on hold as off-topic by t3chb0t, 200_success, Heslacher, πάντα ῥεῖ, Graipher 2 days ago
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave these specific reasons:
- "Authorship of code: Since Code Review is a community where programmers improve their skills through peer review, we require that the code be posted by an author or maintainer of the code, that the code be embedded directly, and that the poster know why the code is written the way it is." – 200_success, Graipher
- "Code not implemented or not working as intended: Code Review is a community where programmers peer-review your working code to address issues such as security, maintainability, performance, and scalability. We require that the code be working correctly, to the best of the author's knowledge, before proceeding with a review." – t3chb0t, Heslacher, πάντα ῥεῖ
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
put on hold as off-topic by t3chb0t, 200_success, Heslacher, πάντα ῥεῖ, Graipher 2 days ago
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave these specific reasons:
- "Authorship of code: Since Code Review is a community where programmers improve their skills through peer review, we require that the code be posted by an author or maintainer of the code, that the code be embedded directly, and that the poster know why the code is written the way it is." – 200_success, Graipher
- "Code not implemented or not working as intended: Code Review is a community where programmers peer-review your working code to address issues such as security, maintainability, performance, and scalability. We require that the code be working correctly, to the best of the author's knowledge, before proceeding with a review." – t3chb0t, Heslacher, πάντα ῥεῖ
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
1
Hello and welcome to Code Review! I'm afraid our site is not well-suited for your question. We only answer questions about already-implemented code. Our help center provides more information about what is on-topic.
– Graham
2 days ago
add a comment |
1
Hello and welcome to Code Review! I'm afraid our site is not well-suited for your question. We only answer questions about already-implemented code. Our help center provides more information about what is on-topic.
– Graham
2 days ago
1
1
Hello and welcome to Code Review! I'm afraid our site is not well-suited for your question. We only answer questions about already-implemented code. Our help center provides more information about what is on-topic.
– Graham
2 days ago
Hello and welcome to Code Review! I'm afraid our site is not well-suited for your question. We only answer questions about already-implemented code. Our help center provides more information about what is on-topic.
– Graham
2 days ago
add a comment |
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
1
Hello and welcome to Code Review! I'm afraid our site is not well-suited for your question. We only answer questions about already-implemented code. Our help center provides more information about what is on-topic.
– Graham
2 days ago