Deriving the translog production function












1














Ive been having difficulty deriving the translog production function defined as:



$$ln y=alpha_0+sum_{i=1}^nalpha_i ln x_i+frac{1}{2}sum_{i=1}^nsum_{j=1}^n beta_{ij}ln x_iln x_j $$



I know we start with a log-log production function.
$$ln y=alpha_0+sum_{i=1}^nalpha_iln x_i$$



the next step from what i recall is to take the taylor series of this function around the point $x_i=0$. the reason why this is an issue is because $ln(0)$ is undefined.



How exactly is this function derived?






microeconomics econometrics production-function







share|improve this question



























    1














    Ive been having difficulty deriving the translog production function defined as:



    $$ln y=alpha_0+sum_{i=1}^nalpha_i ln x_i+frac{1}{2}sum_{i=1}^nsum_{j=1}^n beta_{ij}ln x_iln x_j $$



    I know we start with a log-log production function.
    $$ln y=alpha_0+sum_{i=1}^nalpha_iln x_i$$



    the next step from what i recall is to take the taylor series of this function around the point $x_i=0$. the reason why this is an issue is because $ln(0)$ is undefined.



    How exactly is this function derived?






    microeconomics econometrics production-function







    share|improve this question

























      1












      1








      1







      Ive been having difficulty deriving the translog production function defined as:



      $$ln y=alpha_0+sum_{i=1}^nalpha_i ln x_i+frac{1}{2}sum_{i=1}^nsum_{j=1}^n beta_{ij}ln x_iln x_j $$



      I know we start with a log-log production function.
      $$ln y=alpha_0+sum_{i=1}^nalpha_iln x_i$$



      the next step from what i recall is to take the taylor series of this function around the point $x_i=0$. the reason why this is an issue is because $ln(0)$ is undefined.



      How exactly is this function derived?






      microeconomics econometrics production-function







      share|improve this question













      Ive been having difficulty deriving the translog production function defined as:



      $$ln y=alpha_0+sum_{i=1}^nalpha_i ln x_i+frac{1}{2}sum_{i=1}^nsum_{j=1}^n beta_{ij}ln x_iln x_j $$



      I know we start with a log-log production function.
      $$ln y=alpha_0+sum_{i=1}^nalpha_iln x_i$$



      the next step from what i recall is to take the taylor series of this function around the point $x_i=0$. the reason why this is an issue is because $ln(0)$ is undefined.



      How exactly is this function derived?






      microeconomics econometrics production-function




      microeconomics econometrics production-function






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked 7 hours ago









      EconJohn♦

      3,3571938




      3,3571938






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2














          The idea is indeed to Taylor expand the production function. To justify it, you can start with the constant elasticity of substitution function, which in the two-factor case can be written as



          $$
          Y = A[alpha K^gamma + (1 - alpha)L^gamma]^{1/gamma} tag{1}
          $$



          in this case $X_1 = K$, $X_2 = L$. Now we expand $ln Y$ around $gamma = 0$




          $gamma^0$ term




          $$
          lim_{gamma to 0} ln Y = ln (A K^alpha L^{1 - alpha}) tag{2}
          $$




          $gamma^1$ term




          begin{eqnarray}
          lim_{gamma to 0} frac{partial ln Y}{partial gamma} &=& lim_{gamma to 0}frac{alpha K^{gamma } ln (L)+(1-alpha ) l^{gamma } log (L)}{gamma
          left(alpha K^{gamma }+(1-alpha ) L^{gamma }right)}-frac{ln left(alpha
          K^{gamma }+(1-alpha ) L^{gamma }right)}{gamma ^2}\
          &=& frac{1}{2} (1 - alpha) alpha (ln (K)-ln (L))^2 tag{3}
          end{eqnarray}



          Up to first order we have then



          begin{eqnarray}
          ln Y &approx& color{blue}{(ln Y)_{gamma = 0}} + color{red}{left(frac{partial ln Y}{partial gamma}right)_{gamma = 0} gamma} \
          &stackrel{(2),(3)}{=}& color{blue}{ln A + alpha ln K + (1 - alpha) ln L} + color{red}{frac{1}{2}alpha(1 - alpha)gamma [ln K - ln L]^2} \
          &=& ln A + alpha ln X_1 + (1 - alpha) ln X_2 + frac{alpha gamma (1 -alpha)}{2}left[ln^2 X_1 -2ln X_1ln X_2 + ln^2 X_2 right] \
          &=& alpha_0 + sum_{i = 1}^2 alpha_i ln X_i + frac{1}{2}sum_{i, j = 1}^2 beta_{ij}ln X_i ln X_j tag{3}
          end{eqnarray}



          This is naturally extended to $n > 2$ as



          $$
          ln Y = alpha_0 + sum_{i = 1}^n alpha_i ln X_i + frac{1}{2}sum_{i, j = 1}^n beta_{ij}ln X_i ln X_j
          $$






          share|improve this answer





















            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "591"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2feconomics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f26144%2fderiving-the-translog-production-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            2














            The idea is indeed to Taylor expand the production function. To justify it, you can start with the constant elasticity of substitution function, which in the two-factor case can be written as



            $$
            Y = A[alpha K^gamma + (1 - alpha)L^gamma]^{1/gamma} tag{1}
            $$



            in this case $X_1 = K$, $X_2 = L$. Now we expand $ln Y$ around $gamma = 0$




            $gamma^0$ term




            $$
            lim_{gamma to 0} ln Y = ln (A K^alpha L^{1 - alpha}) tag{2}
            $$




            $gamma^1$ term




            begin{eqnarray}
            lim_{gamma to 0} frac{partial ln Y}{partial gamma} &=& lim_{gamma to 0}frac{alpha K^{gamma } ln (L)+(1-alpha ) l^{gamma } log (L)}{gamma
            left(alpha K^{gamma }+(1-alpha ) L^{gamma }right)}-frac{ln left(alpha
            K^{gamma }+(1-alpha ) L^{gamma }right)}{gamma ^2}\
            &=& frac{1}{2} (1 - alpha) alpha (ln (K)-ln (L))^2 tag{3}
            end{eqnarray}



            Up to first order we have then



            begin{eqnarray}
            ln Y &approx& color{blue}{(ln Y)_{gamma = 0}} + color{red}{left(frac{partial ln Y}{partial gamma}right)_{gamma = 0} gamma} \
            &stackrel{(2),(3)}{=}& color{blue}{ln A + alpha ln K + (1 - alpha) ln L} + color{red}{frac{1}{2}alpha(1 - alpha)gamma [ln K - ln L]^2} \
            &=& ln A + alpha ln X_1 + (1 - alpha) ln X_2 + frac{alpha gamma (1 -alpha)}{2}left[ln^2 X_1 -2ln X_1ln X_2 + ln^2 X_2 right] \
            &=& alpha_0 + sum_{i = 1}^2 alpha_i ln X_i + frac{1}{2}sum_{i, j = 1}^2 beta_{ij}ln X_i ln X_j tag{3}
            end{eqnarray}



            This is naturally extended to $n > 2$ as



            $$
            ln Y = alpha_0 + sum_{i = 1}^n alpha_i ln X_i + frac{1}{2}sum_{i, j = 1}^n beta_{ij}ln X_i ln X_j
            $$






            share|improve this answer


























              2














              The idea is indeed to Taylor expand the production function. To justify it, you can start with the constant elasticity of substitution function, which in the two-factor case can be written as



              $$
              Y = A[alpha K^gamma + (1 - alpha)L^gamma]^{1/gamma} tag{1}
              $$



              in this case $X_1 = K$, $X_2 = L$. Now we expand $ln Y$ around $gamma = 0$




              $gamma^0$ term




              $$
              lim_{gamma to 0} ln Y = ln (A K^alpha L^{1 - alpha}) tag{2}
              $$




              $gamma^1$ term




              begin{eqnarray}
              lim_{gamma to 0} frac{partial ln Y}{partial gamma} &=& lim_{gamma to 0}frac{alpha K^{gamma } ln (L)+(1-alpha ) l^{gamma } log (L)}{gamma
              left(alpha K^{gamma }+(1-alpha ) L^{gamma }right)}-frac{ln left(alpha
              K^{gamma }+(1-alpha ) L^{gamma }right)}{gamma ^2}\
              &=& frac{1}{2} (1 - alpha) alpha (ln (K)-ln (L))^2 tag{3}
              end{eqnarray}



              Up to first order we have then



              begin{eqnarray}
              ln Y &approx& color{blue}{(ln Y)_{gamma = 0}} + color{red}{left(frac{partial ln Y}{partial gamma}right)_{gamma = 0} gamma} \
              &stackrel{(2),(3)}{=}& color{blue}{ln A + alpha ln K + (1 - alpha) ln L} + color{red}{frac{1}{2}alpha(1 - alpha)gamma [ln K - ln L]^2} \
              &=& ln A + alpha ln X_1 + (1 - alpha) ln X_2 + frac{alpha gamma (1 -alpha)}{2}left[ln^2 X_1 -2ln X_1ln X_2 + ln^2 X_2 right] \
              &=& alpha_0 + sum_{i = 1}^2 alpha_i ln X_i + frac{1}{2}sum_{i, j = 1}^2 beta_{ij}ln X_i ln X_j tag{3}
              end{eqnarray}



              This is naturally extended to $n > 2$ as



              $$
              ln Y = alpha_0 + sum_{i = 1}^n alpha_i ln X_i + frac{1}{2}sum_{i, j = 1}^n beta_{ij}ln X_i ln X_j
              $$






              share|improve this answer
























                2












                2








                2






                The idea is indeed to Taylor expand the production function. To justify it, you can start with the constant elasticity of substitution function, which in the two-factor case can be written as



                $$
                Y = A[alpha K^gamma + (1 - alpha)L^gamma]^{1/gamma} tag{1}
                $$



                in this case $X_1 = K$, $X_2 = L$. Now we expand $ln Y$ around $gamma = 0$




                $gamma^0$ term




                $$
                lim_{gamma to 0} ln Y = ln (A K^alpha L^{1 - alpha}) tag{2}
                $$




                $gamma^1$ term




                begin{eqnarray}
                lim_{gamma to 0} frac{partial ln Y}{partial gamma} &=& lim_{gamma to 0}frac{alpha K^{gamma } ln (L)+(1-alpha ) l^{gamma } log (L)}{gamma
                left(alpha K^{gamma }+(1-alpha ) L^{gamma }right)}-frac{ln left(alpha
                K^{gamma }+(1-alpha ) L^{gamma }right)}{gamma ^2}\
                &=& frac{1}{2} (1 - alpha) alpha (ln (K)-ln (L))^2 tag{3}
                end{eqnarray}



                Up to first order we have then



                begin{eqnarray}
                ln Y &approx& color{blue}{(ln Y)_{gamma = 0}} + color{red}{left(frac{partial ln Y}{partial gamma}right)_{gamma = 0} gamma} \
                &stackrel{(2),(3)}{=}& color{blue}{ln A + alpha ln K + (1 - alpha) ln L} + color{red}{frac{1}{2}alpha(1 - alpha)gamma [ln K - ln L]^2} \
                &=& ln A + alpha ln X_1 + (1 - alpha) ln X_2 + frac{alpha gamma (1 -alpha)}{2}left[ln^2 X_1 -2ln X_1ln X_2 + ln^2 X_2 right] \
                &=& alpha_0 + sum_{i = 1}^2 alpha_i ln X_i + frac{1}{2}sum_{i, j = 1}^2 beta_{ij}ln X_i ln X_j tag{3}
                end{eqnarray}



                This is naturally extended to $n > 2$ as



                $$
                ln Y = alpha_0 + sum_{i = 1}^n alpha_i ln X_i + frac{1}{2}sum_{i, j = 1}^n beta_{ij}ln X_i ln X_j
                $$






                share|improve this answer












                The idea is indeed to Taylor expand the production function. To justify it, you can start with the constant elasticity of substitution function, which in the two-factor case can be written as



                $$
                Y = A[alpha K^gamma + (1 - alpha)L^gamma]^{1/gamma} tag{1}
                $$



                in this case $X_1 = K$, $X_2 = L$. Now we expand $ln Y$ around $gamma = 0$




                $gamma^0$ term




                $$
                lim_{gamma to 0} ln Y = ln (A K^alpha L^{1 - alpha}) tag{2}
                $$




                $gamma^1$ term




                begin{eqnarray}
                lim_{gamma to 0} frac{partial ln Y}{partial gamma} &=& lim_{gamma to 0}frac{alpha K^{gamma } ln (L)+(1-alpha ) l^{gamma } log (L)}{gamma
                left(alpha K^{gamma }+(1-alpha ) L^{gamma }right)}-frac{ln left(alpha
                K^{gamma }+(1-alpha ) L^{gamma }right)}{gamma ^2}\
                &=& frac{1}{2} (1 - alpha) alpha (ln (K)-ln (L))^2 tag{3}
                end{eqnarray}



                Up to first order we have then



                begin{eqnarray}
                ln Y &approx& color{blue}{(ln Y)_{gamma = 0}} + color{red}{left(frac{partial ln Y}{partial gamma}right)_{gamma = 0} gamma} \
                &stackrel{(2),(3)}{=}& color{blue}{ln A + alpha ln K + (1 - alpha) ln L} + color{red}{frac{1}{2}alpha(1 - alpha)gamma [ln K - ln L]^2} \
                &=& ln A + alpha ln X_1 + (1 - alpha) ln X_2 + frac{alpha gamma (1 -alpha)}{2}left[ln^2 X_1 -2ln X_1ln X_2 + ln^2 X_2 right] \
                &=& alpha_0 + sum_{i = 1}^2 alpha_i ln X_i + frac{1}{2}sum_{i, j = 1}^2 beta_{ij}ln X_i ln X_j tag{3}
                end{eqnarray}



                This is naturally extended to $n > 2$ as



                $$
                ln Y = alpha_0 + sum_{i = 1}^n alpha_i ln X_i + frac{1}{2}sum_{i, j = 1}^n beta_{ij}ln X_i ln X_j
                $$







                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered 5 hours ago









                caverac

                7721214




                7721214






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Economics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid …



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                    Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                    Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid …



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2feconomics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f26144%2fderiving-the-translog-production-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    -

                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Quarter-circle Tiles

                    Image
                    up vote 0 down vote favorite I have $99$ identical square tiles, each with a quarter-circle drawn on it like this: [asy] size(1.5cm); draw(Arc((2,0),1,90,180),red+1); draw((0,0)--(2,0)--(2,2)--(0,2)--(0,0)); [/asy] When I arrange the tiles in a $9times 11$ rectangular grid, each with a random orientation, what is the expected value of the number of full circles I form? I think this problem has to do with finding the chance any given 2x2 square has a circle, but I can't find it. expected-value share | cite | improve this question asked Nov 20 at 15:03 6minecraftninja 1 2
                    Read more

                    build a pushdown automaton that recognizes the reverse language of a given pushdown automaton?

                    Image
                    0 I think it's similiar to NFAs. I replace the finite states of the given automaton for start-states for my new automaton. I do it with $epsilon$ -transition from the start state to the actual finite states of the given automaton. The start state of the given automaton will be my accepting(finite) state of my new one. All transitions will be reversed of course to recognize the reversed word. But how do I have to change the stack of the pushdown automaton? That's tricky. formal-languages automata context-free-grammar share | cite | improve this question edited Nov 29 '18 at 14:20 joee
                    Read more

                    Mont Emei

                    Image
                    Mont Emei.mw-parser-output .entete.map{background-image:url("//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/7a/Picto_infobox_map.png")} Vue du sommet Wanfo du mont Emei Géographie Altitude 3 099  m , Wanfo Coordonnées 29° 31′ 11″ nord, 103° 19′ 57″ est Administration Pays   Chine Province Sichuan Ville-préfecture Leshan Géolocalisation sur la carte : Sichuan Mont Emei Géolocalisation sur la carte : Chine Mont Emei modifier   Paysage panoramique du mont Emei, incluant le paysage panoramique du grand Bouddha de Leshan *   Patrimoine mondial de l'UNESCO Passerelle en bois sur le versant ouest Pays   Chine Subdivision Sichuan Type Mixte Critères (iv) (vi) (x) Superficie 15 400 ha Numéro d’identification 779 Zone géographique Asie et Pacifique  ** Année d’inscription 1996 (20 e session) * Descriptif officiel UNESCO ** Classification géog
                    Read more