Infinite Series polynomials












1














This is a homework problem.



Let P and Q be polynomials of degree $k$ and $m$.
Assume $Q(n) neq 0 $ for all $n in mathbb{N} $



Prove the series



$sum_{n=1}^{infty} {P(n)}/{Q(n)}$



Is convergent if $m geq k+2$ and divergent if $m leq k+1 $



From my understanding it would converge when $ m > k$ And therefore i can't figure out how it should be divergent when $m leq k+1$ because then $m=k+1$ and $m>k$










share|cite|improve this question



























    1














    This is a homework problem.



    Let P and Q be polynomials of degree $k$ and $m$.
    Assume $Q(n) neq 0 $ for all $n in mathbb{N} $



    Prove the series



    $sum_{n=1}^{infty} {P(n)}/{Q(n)}$



    Is convergent if $m geq k+2$ and divergent if $m leq k+1 $



    From my understanding it would converge when $ m > k$ And therefore i can't figure out how it should be divergent when $m leq k+1$ because then $m=k+1$ and $m>k$










    share|cite|improve this question

























      1












      1








      1


      1





      This is a homework problem.



      Let P and Q be polynomials of degree $k$ and $m$.
      Assume $Q(n) neq 0 $ for all $n in mathbb{N} $



      Prove the series



      $sum_{n=1}^{infty} {P(n)}/{Q(n)}$



      Is convergent if $m geq k+2$ and divergent if $m leq k+1 $



      From my understanding it would converge when $ m > k$ And therefore i can't figure out how it should be divergent when $m leq k+1$ because then $m=k+1$ and $m>k$










      share|cite|improve this question













      This is a homework problem.



      Let P and Q be polynomials of degree $k$ and $m$.
      Assume $Q(n) neq 0 $ for all $n in mathbb{N} $



      Prove the series



      $sum_{n=1}^{infty} {P(n)}/{Q(n)}$



      Is convergent if $m geq k+2$ and divergent if $m leq k+1 $



      From my understanding it would converge when $ m > k$ And therefore i can't figure out how it should be divergent when $m leq k+1$ because then $m=k+1$ and $m>k$







      sequences-and-series polynomials






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Nov 25 at 19:12









      Winther

      227




      227






















          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2














          Write the polynomials as
          begin{align}
          P(x) &= a_kx^k+dots+a_1x+a_0 \[4px]
          Q(x) &= b_mx^n+dots+b_1x+b_0
          end{align}

          with $a_kne0$ and $b_mne0$.



          Then you can rewrite
          $$
          frac{P(n)}{Q(n)}=
          frac{n^k}{n^m}
          frac{a_k+dfrac{a_{k-1}}{n}+dots+dfrac{a_1}{n^{k-1}}+dfrac{a_0}{n^k}}
          {b_m+dfrac{b_{m-1}}{n}+dots+dfrac{b_1}{n^{m-1}}+dfrac{b_0}{n^m}}
          $$

          Note that the limit of the big fraction is $a_k/b_m=c$. If $c<0$, we can substitute $P(n)$ with $-P(n)$, without affecting the convergence or divergence of the series, because from some point on, all terms of the series have the same sign as $c$.



          Thus we can assume $c>0$. Then there exists $N$ such that, for every $n>N$, all terms $P(n)/Q(n)$ have the same sign and
          $$
          0<frac{c}{2}frac{n^k}{n^m}<frac{P(n)}{Q(n)}<frac{3c}{2}frac{n^k}{n^m}
          $$

          Hence the given series converges if and only if
          $$
          sum_{n}frac{n^k}{n^m}
          $$

          converges.



          If $mle k$ this series doesn't converge, because the general term doesn't have zero limit. If $m=k+1$ this is the harmonic series, which does not converge.



          If $m>k+1$ (that is, $mge k+2$) then the series converges by comparison with $1/n^2$.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • Could you elaborate on how you go from $0<frac{c}{2}frac{n^k}{n^m}<frac{P(n)}{Q(n)}<frac{3c}{2}frac{n^k}{n^m}$ to the series converges if and if only $sum_{n}frac{n^k}{n^m}$
            – Winther
            Nov 26 at 1:01








          • 1




            @ChristianWinther If $kne0$, then the series $sum_n a_n$ converges if and only if $sum_n (ka_n)$ converges. If $0le a_nle b_n$ and $sum_n b_n$ converges, then $sum_n a_n$ converges.
            – egreg
            Nov 26 at 8:54



















          0














          For $n$ big enough, $P(n)/Q(n)$ has always the same sign, so, WLOG, we can assume that we have a series with positive terms(*).



          Let $P(n)=p_0+p_1n+cdots+p_k n^k$. Because $P$ is of degree $k$, $p_kne0$.



          Let $Q(n)=q_0+q_1n+cdots+q_m n^m$. Because $Q$ is of degree $m$, $q_mne0$.



          Now, $$lim_{ntoinfty}frac{P(n)/Q(n)}{1/n^{m-k}}= lim_{ntoinfty}frac{n^{m-k} P(n)}{Q(n)}=lim_{ntoinfty}frac{p_0n^{m-k}+p_1n^{m-k+1}+cdots+p_kn^m}{q_0+q_1n+cdots q_mn^m}=frac{p_0}{q_0}.$$ So your series has the same character as $sum frac{1}{n^{m-k}}$ wich is convergente $iff$ $m-k>1$.



          But because $m$ and $k$ are both integers, $m-k>1$ $iff$ $m-kge 2$.



          EDIT (*):
          If $p_kcdot q_m>0$, then for $n$ big enough, $P(n)/Q(n)>0$ because both $P(n)$ and $Q(n)$ tends simultaneously to $+infty$ or $-infty$, when $ntoinfty$.



          If $p_kcdot q_m<0$, then $P(n)to+infty$ and $Q(n)to-infty$ ($ntoinfty$) or viceversa. Then $P(n)/Q(n)<0$ for $n$ big enough and then you only have to work with $-P(n)/Q(n)$.






          share|cite|improve this answer





























            0














            The idea is that if $mgeq {k+2}$, then
            $$
            frac{P(n)}{Q(n)}sim frac{C}{n^{m-k}}
            $$

            where $f(n)sim g(n)$ means $f(n)/g(n)to 1$ as $ntoinfty$ for some constant $C$. The limit comparison test gives us the result. If $mleq k$ you should be able to show the terms of the series don't go to zero. If $m=k+1$, you should be able to apply limit comparison test by deducing that
            $$
            frac{P(n)}{Q(n)}sim frac{D}{n}.
            $$

            for some constant $D$.






            share|cite|improve this answer























            • That's almost correct -- you forgot the leading coefficients of $P$ and $Q$ in the ratio.
              – Clement C.
              Nov 25 at 19:22










            • But if $m=k+1$ with your explanation then it still converges to $0$, but the question asks me to prove it is divergent.
              – Winther
              Nov 25 at 19:47












            • Is it maybe a fault in the question or am I missing something?
              – Winther
              Nov 25 at 19:47










            • @ChristianWinther the sequence $frac1n$ converges to $0$ but the partial sums $sum_{n=1}^N frac{1}{n}$ diverges like $log N$.
              – achille hui
              Nov 25 at 22:13












            • @achillehui Thank you, i had forgotten about the harmonic series diverging
              – Winther
              Nov 25 at 22:17











            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3013255%2finfinite-series-polynomials%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            3 Answers
            3






            active

            oldest

            votes








            3 Answers
            3






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            2














            Write the polynomials as
            begin{align}
            P(x) &= a_kx^k+dots+a_1x+a_0 \[4px]
            Q(x) &= b_mx^n+dots+b_1x+b_0
            end{align}

            with $a_kne0$ and $b_mne0$.



            Then you can rewrite
            $$
            frac{P(n)}{Q(n)}=
            frac{n^k}{n^m}
            frac{a_k+dfrac{a_{k-1}}{n}+dots+dfrac{a_1}{n^{k-1}}+dfrac{a_0}{n^k}}
            {b_m+dfrac{b_{m-1}}{n}+dots+dfrac{b_1}{n^{m-1}}+dfrac{b_0}{n^m}}
            $$

            Note that the limit of the big fraction is $a_k/b_m=c$. If $c<0$, we can substitute $P(n)$ with $-P(n)$, without affecting the convergence or divergence of the series, because from some point on, all terms of the series have the same sign as $c$.



            Thus we can assume $c>0$. Then there exists $N$ such that, for every $n>N$, all terms $P(n)/Q(n)$ have the same sign and
            $$
            0<frac{c}{2}frac{n^k}{n^m}<frac{P(n)}{Q(n)}<frac{3c}{2}frac{n^k}{n^m}
            $$

            Hence the given series converges if and only if
            $$
            sum_{n}frac{n^k}{n^m}
            $$

            converges.



            If $mle k$ this series doesn't converge, because the general term doesn't have zero limit. If $m=k+1$ this is the harmonic series, which does not converge.



            If $m>k+1$ (that is, $mge k+2$) then the series converges by comparison with $1/n^2$.






            share|cite|improve this answer





















            • Could you elaborate on how you go from $0<frac{c}{2}frac{n^k}{n^m}<frac{P(n)}{Q(n)}<frac{3c}{2}frac{n^k}{n^m}$ to the series converges if and if only $sum_{n}frac{n^k}{n^m}$
              – Winther
              Nov 26 at 1:01








            • 1




              @ChristianWinther If $kne0$, then the series $sum_n a_n$ converges if and only if $sum_n (ka_n)$ converges. If $0le a_nle b_n$ and $sum_n b_n$ converges, then $sum_n a_n$ converges.
              – egreg
              Nov 26 at 8:54
















            2














            Write the polynomials as
            begin{align}
            P(x) &= a_kx^k+dots+a_1x+a_0 \[4px]
            Q(x) &= b_mx^n+dots+b_1x+b_0
            end{align}

            with $a_kne0$ and $b_mne0$.



            Then you can rewrite
            $$
            frac{P(n)}{Q(n)}=
            frac{n^k}{n^m}
            frac{a_k+dfrac{a_{k-1}}{n}+dots+dfrac{a_1}{n^{k-1}}+dfrac{a_0}{n^k}}
            {b_m+dfrac{b_{m-1}}{n}+dots+dfrac{b_1}{n^{m-1}}+dfrac{b_0}{n^m}}
            $$

            Note that the limit of the big fraction is $a_k/b_m=c$. If $c<0$, we can substitute $P(n)$ with $-P(n)$, without affecting the convergence or divergence of the series, because from some point on, all terms of the series have the same sign as $c$.



            Thus we can assume $c>0$. Then there exists $N$ such that, for every $n>N$, all terms $P(n)/Q(n)$ have the same sign and
            $$
            0<frac{c}{2}frac{n^k}{n^m}<frac{P(n)}{Q(n)}<frac{3c}{2}frac{n^k}{n^m}
            $$

            Hence the given series converges if and only if
            $$
            sum_{n}frac{n^k}{n^m}
            $$

            converges.



            If $mle k$ this series doesn't converge, because the general term doesn't have zero limit. If $m=k+1$ this is the harmonic series, which does not converge.



            If $m>k+1$ (that is, $mge k+2$) then the series converges by comparison with $1/n^2$.






            share|cite|improve this answer





















            • Could you elaborate on how you go from $0<frac{c}{2}frac{n^k}{n^m}<frac{P(n)}{Q(n)}<frac{3c}{2}frac{n^k}{n^m}$ to the series converges if and if only $sum_{n}frac{n^k}{n^m}$
              – Winther
              Nov 26 at 1:01








            • 1




              @ChristianWinther If $kne0$, then the series $sum_n a_n$ converges if and only if $sum_n (ka_n)$ converges. If $0le a_nle b_n$ and $sum_n b_n$ converges, then $sum_n a_n$ converges.
              – egreg
              Nov 26 at 8:54














            2












            2








            2






            Write the polynomials as
            begin{align}
            P(x) &= a_kx^k+dots+a_1x+a_0 \[4px]
            Q(x) &= b_mx^n+dots+b_1x+b_0
            end{align}

            with $a_kne0$ and $b_mne0$.



            Then you can rewrite
            $$
            frac{P(n)}{Q(n)}=
            frac{n^k}{n^m}
            frac{a_k+dfrac{a_{k-1}}{n}+dots+dfrac{a_1}{n^{k-1}}+dfrac{a_0}{n^k}}
            {b_m+dfrac{b_{m-1}}{n}+dots+dfrac{b_1}{n^{m-1}}+dfrac{b_0}{n^m}}
            $$

            Note that the limit of the big fraction is $a_k/b_m=c$. If $c<0$, we can substitute $P(n)$ with $-P(n)$, without affecting the convergence or divergence of the series, because from some point on, all terms of the series have the same sign as $c$.



            Thus we can assume $c>0$. Then there exists $N$ such that, for every $n>N$, all terms $P(n)/Q(n)$ have the same sign and
            $$
            0<frac{c}{2}frac{n^k}{n^m}<frac{P(n)}{Q(n)}<frac{3c}{2}frac{n^k}{n^m}
            $$

            Hence the given series converges if and only if
            $$
            sum_{n}frac{n^k}{n^m}
            $$

            converges.



            If $mle k$ this series doesn't converge, because the general term doesn't have zero limit. If $m=k+1$ this is the harmonic series, which does not converge.



            If $m>k+1$ (that is, $mge k+2$) then the series converges by comparison with $1/n^2$.






            share|cite|improve this answer












            Write the polynomials as
            begin{align}
            P(x) &= a_kx^k+dots+a_1x+a_0 \[4px]
            Q(x) &= b_mx^n+dots+b_1x+b_0
            end{align}

            with $a_kne0$ and $b_mne0$.



            Then you can rewrite
            $$
            frac{P(n)}{Q(n)}=
            frac{n^k}{n^m}
            frac{a_k+dfrac{a_{k-1}}{n}+dots+dfrac{a_1}{n^{k-1}}+dfrac{a_0}{n^k}}
            {b_m+dfrac{b_{m-1}}{n}+dots+dfrac{b_1}{n^{m-1}}+dfrac{b_0}{n^m}}
            $$

            Note that the limit of the big fraction is $a_k/b_m=c$. If $c<0$, we can substitute $P(n)$ with $-P(n)$, without affecting the convergence or divergence of the series, because from some point on, all terms of the series have the same sign as $c$.



            Thus we can assume $c>0$. Then there exists $N$ such that, for every $n>N$, all terms $P(n)/Q(n)$ have the same sign and
            $$
            0<frac{c}{2}frac{n^k}{n^m}<frac{P(n)}{Q(n)}<frac{3c}{2}frac{n^k}{n^m}
            $$

            Hence the given series converges if and only if
            $$
            sum_{n}frac{n^k}{n^m}
            $$

            converges.



            If $mle k$ this series doesn't converge, because the general term doesn't have zero limit. If $m=k+1$ this is the harmonic series, which does not converge.



            If $m>k+1$ (that is, $mge k+2$) then the series converges by comparison with $1/n^2$.







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered Nov 25 at 21:39









            egreg

            177k1484200




            177k1484200












            • Could you elaborate on how you go from $0<frac{c}{2}frac{n^k}{n^m}<frac{P(n)}{Q(n)}<frac{3c}{2}frac{n^k}{n^m}$ to the series converges if and if only $sum_{n}frac{n^k}{n^m}$
              – Winther
              Nov 26 at 1:01








            • 1




              @ChristianWinther If $kne0$, then the series $sum_n a_n$ converges if and only if $sum_n (ka_n)$ converges. If $0le a_nle b_n$ and $sum_n b_n$ converges, then $sum_n a_n$ converges.
              – egreg
              Nov 26 at 8:54


















            • Could you elaborate on how you go from $0<frac{c}{2}frac{n^k}{n^m}<frac{P(n)}{Q(n)}<frac{3c}{2}frac{n^k}{n^m}$ to the series converges if and if only $sum_{n}frac{n^k}{n^m}$
              – Winther
              Nov 26 at 1:01








            • 1




              @ChristianWinther If $kne0$, then the series $sum_n a_n$ converges if and only if $sum_n (ka_n)$ converges. If $0le a_nle b_n$ and $sum_n b_n$ converges, then $sum_n a_n$ converges.
              – egreg
              Nov 26 at 8:54
















            Could you elaborate on how you go from $0<frac{c}{2}frac{n^k}{n^m}<frac{P(n)}{Q(n)}<frac{3c}{2}frac{n^k}{n^m}$ to the series converges if and if only $sum_{n}frac{n^k}{n^m}$
            – Winther
            Nov 26 at 1:01






            Could you elaborate on how you go from $0<frac{c}{2}frac{n^k}{n^m}<frac{P(n)}{Q(n)}<frac{3c}{2}frac{n^k}{n^m}$ to the series converges if and if only $sum_{n}frac{n^k}{n^m}$
            – Winther
            Nov 26 at 1:01






            1




            1




            @ChristianWinther If $kne0$, then the series $sum_n a_n$ converges if and only if $sum_n (ka_n)$ converges. If $0le a_nle b_n$ and $sum_n b_n$ converges, then $sum_n a_n$ converges.
            – egreg
            Nov 26 at 8:54




            @ChristianWinther If $kne0$, then the series $sum_n a_n$ converges if and only if $sum_n (ka_n)$ converges. If $0le a_nle b_n$ and $sum_n b_n$ converges, then $sum_n a_n$ converges.
            – egreg
            Nov 26 at 8:54











            0














            For $n$ big enough, $P(n)/Q(n)$ has always the same sign, so, WLOG, we can assume that we have a series with positive terms(*).



            Let $P(n)=p_0+p_1n+cdots+p_k n^k$. Because $P$ is of degree $k$, $p_kne0$.



            Let $Q(n)=q_0+q_1n+cdots+q_m n^m$. Because $Q$ is of degree $m$, $q_mne0$.



            Now, $$lim_{ntoinfty}frac{P(n)/Q(n)}{1/n^{m-k}}= lim_{ntoinfty}frac{n^{m-k} P(n)}{Q(n)}=lim_{ntoinfty}frac{p_0n^{m-k}+p_1n^{m-k+1}+cdots+p_kn^m}{q_0+q_1n+cdots q_mn^m}=frac{p_0}{q_0}.$$ So your series has the same character as $sum frac{1}{n^{m-k}}$ wich is convergente $iff$ $m-k>1$.



            But because $m$ and $k$ are both integers, $m-k>1$ $iff$ $m-kge 2$.



            EDIT (*):
            If $p_kcdot q_m>0$, then for $n$ big enough, $P(n)/Q(n)>0$ because both $P(n)$ and $Q(n)$ tends simultaneously to $+infty$ or $-infty$, when $ntoinfty$.



            If $p_kcdot q_m<0$, then $P(n)to+infty$ and $Q(n)to-infty$ ($ntoinfty$) or viceversa. Then $P(n)/Q(n)<0$ for $n$ big enough and then you only have to work with $-P(n)/Q(n)$.






            share|cite|improve this answer


























              0














              For $n$ big enough, $P(n)/Q(n)$ has always the same sign, so, WLOG, we can assume that we have a series with positive terms(*).



              Let $P(n)=p_0+p_1n+cdots+p_k n^k$. Because $P$ is of degree $k$, $p_kne0$.



              Let $Q(n)=q_0+q_1n+cdots+q_m n^m$. Because $Q$ is of degree $m$, $q_mne0$.



              Now, $$lim_{ntoinfty}frac{P(n)/Q(n)}{1/n^{m-k}}= lim_{ntoinfty}frac{n^{m-k} P(n)}{Q(n)}=lim_{ntoinfty}frac{p_0n^{m-k}+p_1n^{m-k+1}+cdots+p_kn^m}{q_0+q_1n+cdots q_mn^m}=frac{p_0}{q_0}.$$ So your series has the same character as $sum frac{1}{n^{m-k}}$ wich is convergente $iff$ $m-k>1$.



              But because $m$ and $k$ are both integers, $m-k>1$ $iff$ $m-kge 2$.



              EDIT (*):
              If $p_kcdot q_m>0$, then for $n$ big enough, $P(n)/Q(n)>0$ because both $P(n)$ and $Q(n)$ tends simultaneously to $+infty$ or $-infty$, when $ntoinfty$.



              If $p_kcdot q_m<0$, then $P(n)to+infty$ and $Q(n)to-infty$ ($ntoinfty$) or viceversa. Then $P(n)/Q(n)<0$ for $n$ big enough and then you only have to work with $-P(n)/Q(n)$.






              share|cite|improve this answer
























                0












                0








                0






                For $n$ big enough, $P(n)/Q(n)$ has always the same sign, so, WLOG, we can assume that we have a series with positive terms(*).



                Let $P(n)=p_0+p_1n+cdots+p_k n^k$. Because $P$ is of degree $k$, $p_kne0$.



                Let $Q(n)=q_0+q_1n+cdots+q_m n^m$. Because $Q$ is of degree $m$, $q_mne0$.



                Now, $$lim_{ntoinfty}frac{P(n)/Q(n)}{1/n^{m-k}}= lim_{ntoinfty}frac{n^{m-k} P(n)}{Q(n)}=lim_{ntoinfty}frac{p_0n^{m-k}+p_1n^{m-k+1}+cdots+p_kn^m}{q_0+q_1n+cdots q_mn^m}=frac{p_0}{q_0}.$$ So your series has the same character as $sum frac{1}{n^{m-k}}$ wich is convergente $iff$ $m-k>1$.



                But because $m$ and $k$ are both integers, $m-k>1$ $iff$ $m-kge 2$.



                EDIT (*):
                If $p_kcdot q_m>0$, then for $n$ big enough, $P(n)/Q(n)>0$ because both $P(n)$ and $Q(n)$ tends simultaneously to $+infty$ or $-infty$, when $ntoinfty$.



                If $p_kcdot q_m<0$, then $P(n)to+infty$ and $Q(n)to-infty$ ($ntoinfty$) or viceversa. Then $P(n)/Q(n)<0$ for $n$ big enough and then you only have to work with $-P(n)/Q(n)$.






                share|cite|improve this answer












                For $n$ big enough, $P(n)/Q(n)$ has always the same sign, so, WLOG, we can assume that we have a series with positive terms(*).



                Let $P(n)=p_0+p_1n+cdots+p_k n^k$. Because $P$ is of degree $k$, $p_kne0$.



                Let $Q(n)=q_0+q_1n+cdots+q_m n^m$. Because $Q$ is of degree $m$, $q_mne0$.



                Now, $$lim_{ntoinfty}frac{P(n)/Q(n)}{1/n^{m-k}}= lim_{ntoinfty}frac{n^{m-k} P(n)}{Q(n)}=lim_{ntoinfty}frac{p_0n^{m-k}+p_1n^{m-k+1}+cdots+p_kn^m}{q_0+q_1n+cdots q_mn^m}=frac{p_0}{q_0}.$$ So your series has the same character as $sum frac{1}{n^{m-k}}$ wich is convergente $iff$ $m-k>1$.



                But because $m$ and $k$ are both integers, $m-k>1$ $iff$ $m-kge 2$.



                EDIT (*):
                If $p_kcdot q_m>0$, then for $n$ big enough, $P(n)/Q(n)>0$ because both $P(n)$ and $Q(n)$ tends simultaneously to $+infty$ or $-infty$, when $ntoinfty$.



                If $p_kcdot q_m<0$, then $P(n)to+infty$ and $Q(n)to-infty$ ($ntoinfty$) or viceversa. Then $P(n)/Q(n)<0$ for $n$ big enough and then you only have to work with $-P(n)/Q(n)$.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Nov 25 at 19:20









                Tito Eliatron

                1,530622




                1,530622























                    0














                    The idea is that if $mgeq {k+2}$, then
                    $$
                    frac{P(n)}{Q(n)}sim frac{C}{n^{m-k}}
                    $$

                    where $f(n)sim g(n)$ means $f(n)/g(n)to 1$ as $ntoinfty$ for some constant $C$. The limit comparison test gives us the result. If $mleq k$ you should be able to show the terms of the series don't go to zero. If $m=k+1$, you should be able to apply limit comparison test by deducing that
                    $$
                    frac{P(n)}{Q(n)}sim frac{D}{n}.
                    $$

                    for some constant $D$.






                    share|cite|improve this answer























                    • That's almost correct -- you forgot the leading coefficients of $P$ and $Q$ in the ratio.
                      – Clement C.
                      Nov 25 at 19:22










                    • But if $m=k+1$ with your explanation then it still converges to $0$, but the question asks me to prove it is divergent.
                      – Winther
                      Nov 25 at 19:47












                    • Is it maybe a fault in the question or am I missing something?
                      – Winther
                      Nov 25 at 19:47










                    • @ChristianWinther the sequence $frac1n$ converges to $0$ but the partial sums $sum_{n=1}^N frac{1}{n}$ diverges like $log N$.
                      – achille hui
                      Nov 25 at 22:13












                    • @achillehui Thank you, i had forgotten about the harmonic series diverging
                      – Winther
                      Nov 25 at 22:17
















                    0














                    The idea is that if $mgeq {k+2}$, then
                    $$
                    frac{P(n)}{Q(n)}sim frac{C}{n^{m-k}}
                    $$

                    where $f(n)sim g(n)$ means $f(n)/g(n)to 1$ as $ntoinfty$ for some constant $C$. The limit comparison test gives us the result. If $mleq k$ you should be able to show the terms of the series don't go to zero. If $m=k+1$, you should be able to apply limit comparison test by deducing that
                    $$
                    frac{P(n)}{Q(n)}sim frac{D}{n}.
                    $$

                    for some constant $D$.






                    share|cite|improve this answer























                    • That's almost correct -- you forgot the leading coefficients of $P$ and $Q$ in the ratio.
                      – Clement C.
                      Nov 25 at 19:22










                    • But if $m=k+1$ with your explanation then it still converges to $0$, but the question asks me to prove it is divergent.
                      – Winther
                      Nov 25 at 19:47












                    • Is it maybe a fault in the question or am I missing something?
                      – Winther
                      Nov 25 at 19:47










                    • @ChristianWinther the sequence $frac1n$ converges to $0$ but the partial sums $sum_{n=1}^N frac{1}{n}$ diverges like $log N$.
                      – achille hui
                      Nov 25 at 22:13












                    • @achillehui Thank you, i had forgotten about the harmonic series diverging
                      – Winther
                      Nov 25 at 22:17














                    0












                    0








                    0






                    The idea is that if $mgeq {k+2}$, then
                    $$
                    frac{P(n)}{Q(n)}sim frac{C}{n^{m-k}}
                    $$

                    where $f(n)sim g(n)$ means $f(n)/g(n)to 1$ as $ntoinfty$ for some constant $C$. The limit comparison test gives us the result. If $mleq k$ you should be able to show the terms of the series don't go to zero. If $m=k+1$, you should be able to apply limit comparison test by deducing that
                    $$
                    frac{P(n)}{Q(n)}sim frac{D}{n}.
                    $$

                    for some constant $D$.






                    share|cite|improve this answer














                    The idea is that if $mgeq {k+2}$, then
                    $$
                    frac{P(n)}{Q(n)}sim frac{C}{n^{m-k}}
                    $$

                    where $f(n)sim g(n)$ means $f(n)/g(n)to 1$ as $ntoinfty$ for some constant $C$. The limit comparison test gives us the result. If $mleq k$ you should be able to show the terms of the series don't go to zero. If $m=k+1$, you should be able to apply limit comparison test by deducing that
                    $$
                    frac{P(n)}{Q(n)}sim frac{D}{n}.
                    $$

                    for some constant $D$.







                    share|cite|improve this answer














                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer








                    edited Nov 25 at 23:08

























                    answered Nov 25 at 19:16









                    Foobaz John

                    20.8k41250




                    20.8k41250












                    • That's almost correct -- you forgot the leading coefficients of $P$ and $Q$ in the ratio.
                      – Clement C.
                      Nov 25 at 19:22










                    • But if $m=k+1$ with your explanation then it still converges to $0$, but the question asks me to prove it is divergent.
                      – Winther
                      Nov 25 at 19:47












                    • Is it maybe a fault in the question or am I missing something?
                      – Winther
                      Nov 25 at 19:47










                    • @ChristianWinther the sequence $frac1n$ converges to $0$ but the partial sums $sum_{n=1}^N frac{1}{n}$ diverges like $log N$.
                      – achille hui
                      Nov 25 at 22:13












                    • @achillehui Thank you, i had forgotten about the harmonic series diverging
                      – Winther
                      Nov 25 at 22:17


















                    • That's almost correct -- you forgot the leading coefficients of $P$ and $Q$ in the ratio.
                      – Clement C.
                      Nov 25 at 19:22










                    • But if $m=k+1$ with your explanation then it still converges to $0$, but the question asks me to prove it is divergent.
                      – Winther
                      Nov 25 at 19:47












                    • Is it maybe a fault in the question or am I missing something?
                      – Winther
                      Nov 25 at 19:47










                    • @ChristianWinther the sequence $frac1n$ converges to $0$ but the partial sums $sum_{n=1}^N frac{1}{n}$ diverges like $log N$.
                      – achille hui
                      Nov 25 at 22:13












                    • @achillehui Thank you, i had forgotten about the harmonic series diverging
                      – Winther
                      Nov 25 at 22:17
















                    That's almost correct -- you forgot the leading coefficients of $P$ and $Q$ in the ratio.
                    – Clement C.
                    Nov 25 at 19:22




                    That's almost correct -- you forgot the leading coefficients of $P$ and $Q$ in the ratio.
                    – Clement C.
                    Nov 25 at 19:22












                    But if $m=k+1$ with your explanation then it still converges to $0$, but the question asks me to prove it is divergent.
                    – Winther
                    Nov 25 at 19:47






                    But if $m=k+1$ with your explanation then it still converges to $0$, but the question asks me to prove it is divergent.
                    – Winther
                    Nov 25 at 19:47














                    Is it maybe a fault in the question or am I missing something?
                    – Winther
                    Nov 25 at 19:47




                    Is it maybe a fault in the question or am I missing something?
                    – Winther
                    Nov 25 at 19:47












                    @ChristianWinther the sequence $frac1n$ converges to $0$ but the partial sums $sum_{n=1}^N frac{1}{n}$ diverges like $log N$.
                    – achille hui
                    Nov 25 at 22:13






                    @ChristianWinther the sequence $frac1n$ converges to $0$ but the partial sums $sum_{n=1}^N frac{1}{n}$ diverges like $log N$.
                    – achille hui
                    Nov 25 at 22:13














                    @achillehui Thank you, i had forgotten about the harmonic series diverging
                    – Winther
                    Nov 25 at 22:17




                    @achillehui Thank you, i had forgotten about the harmonic series diverging
                    – Winther
                    Nov 25 at 22:17


















                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                    Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                    Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3013255%2finfinite-series-polynomials%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Quarter-circle Tiles

                    build a pushdown automaton that recognizes the reverse language of a given pushdown automaton?

                    Mont Emei