Henselianizations over countable index sets












4














Let $A$ be a ring, $Isubset A$ a finitely generated ideal.



The henselianization $A^h$ of $A$ along $I$ is the universal $A$-algebra that is henselian along $I$ and can be presented as a direct limit of étale ring maps that are the identity on mod $I$ fibers:



$$A^h = varinjlim_{sin S} A_s$$



where $Ato A_s$ is étale and such that $A/Ito A_s/I$ is the identity, and $S$ is an index set.




When $A$ is smooth over the Noetherian henselian valuation ring $R = mathbf{Z}_{(p)}^h$ and $I = pA$ is principal, can $S$ be arranged to be a countable set?











share|cite|improve this question





























    4














    Let $A$ be a ring, $Isubset A$ a finitely generated ideal.



    The henselianization $A^h$ of $A$ along $I$ is the universal $A$-algebra that is henselian along $I$ and can be presented as a direct limit of étale ring maps that are the identity on mod $I$ fibers:



    $$A^h = varinjlim_{sin S} A_s$$



    where $Ato A_s$ is étale and such that $A/Ito A_s/I$ is the identity, and $S$ is an index set.




    When $A$ is smooth over the Noetherian henselian valuation ring $R = mathbf{Z}_{(p)}^h$ and $I = pA$ is principal, can $S$ be arranged to be a countable set?











    share|cite|improve this question



























      4












      4








      4







      Let $A$ be a ring, $Isubset A$ a finitely generated ideal.



      The henselianization $A^h$ of $A$ along $I$ is the universal $A$-algebra that is henselian along $I$ and can be presented as a direct limit of étale ring maps that are the identity on mod $I$ fibers:



      $$A^h = varinjlim_{sin S} A_s$$



      where $Ato A_s$ is étale and such that $A/Ito A_s/I$ is the identity, and $S$ is an index set.




      When $A$ is smooth over the Noetherian henselian valuation ring $R = mathbf{Z}_{(p)}^h$ and $I = pA$ is principal, can $S$ be arranged to be a countable set?











      share|cite|improve this question















      Let $A$ be a ring, $Isubset A$ a finitely generated ideal.



      The henselianization $A^h$ of $A$ along $I$ is the universal $A$-algebra that is henselian along $I$ and can be presented as a direct limit of étale ring maps that are the identity on mod $I$ fibers:



      $$A^h = varinjlim_{sin S} A_s$$



      where $Ato A_s$ is étale and such that $A/Ito A_s/I$ is the identity, and $S$ is an index set.




      When $A$ is smooth over the Noetherian henselian valuation ring $R = mathbf{Z}_{(p)}^h$ and $I = pA$ is principal, can $S$ be arranged to be a countable set?








      ag.algebraic-geometry ac.commutative-algebra arithmetic-geometry etale-cohomology






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Dec 9 at 19:38

























      asked Dec 9 at 18:14









      Ben

      413




      413






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          4














          No.



          Take $A = mathbb{C}[x]$ and $I=(x)$. Suppose that $A^h$ is the direct limit of a system of etale algebras $A_i$ such that $A_i/(x) cong mathbb{C}$. We can assume that each $A_i$ is finitely presented.



          For $ain mathbb{C}setminus {0}$, consider the algebra $A[1/(x-a)]$. Then:



          (1) for every nonzero $ain mathbb{C}$, the map $Ato A^h$ factors through $A[1/(x-a)]$ (by universal property of henselization)



          (2) for every index $i$, there are only finitely many nonzero $ain mathbb{C}$ for which $Ato A_i$ factors through $A[1/(x-a)]$ (because the image of ${rm Spec}(A_i) to {rm Spec}(A)$ is open and dense).



          This shows that the index set has to have cardinality at least equal to the cardinality of $mathbb{C}$.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • I see your point. However, in my question $A$ is smooth over some Noetherian henselian valuation ring with uniformizer $x$ (I should have made it clear the valuation ring is non-archimedean: at least I always mean that), and the ideal $I$ should be the extension of the principal maximal ideal of the valuation ring, ie. $xA$. In my question, I am thinking about $R = mathbf{Z}_{(p)}^h$, $A$ smooth over $R$, $I = pA$. I have edited my final question to only include this case
            – Ben
            Dec 9 at 19:37








          • 1




            Sorry, I misunderstood the question. But I think you can make a variant of the above counterexample work with $A = mathbb{Z}_p[t]$ and $a in mathbb{Q}_psetminus mathbb{Z}_p$. However, in your particular case ($mathbb{Z}_{(p)}$ rather than the $p$-adics), it seems that the rings are countable, so there are only countably many f.p. etale algebras over them, no?
            – Piotr Achinger
            Dec 9 at 19:51








          • 1




            More precisely, the variant with $p$-adics would be: $A=mathbb{Z}_p[x]$, $I=(p)$ and for $a = c/p^n in mathbb{Q}_p$ with $cinmathbb{Z}^times_p$ and $n>0$, the algebra $A[1/(p^n x-c)]$.
            – Piotr Achinger
            Dec 9 at 20:03











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "504"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f317261%2fhenselianizations-over-countable-index-sets%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          4














          No.



          Take $A = mathbb{C}[x]$ and $I=(x)$. Suppose that $A^h$ is the direct limit of a system of etale algebras $A_i$ such that $A_i/(x) cong mathbb{C}$. We can assume that each $A_i$ is finitely presented.



          For $ain mathbb{C}setminus {0}$, consider the algebra $A[1/(x-a)]$. Then:



          (1) for every nonzero $ain mathbb{C}$, the map $Ato A^h$ factors through $A[1/(x-a)]$ (by universal property of henselization)



          (2) for every index $i$, there are only finitely many nonzero $ain mathbb{C}$ for which $Ato A_i$ factors through $A[1/(x-a)]$ (because the image of ${rm Spec}(A_i) to {rm Spec}(A)$ is open and dense).



          This shows that the index set has to have cardinality at least equal to the cardinality of $mathbb{C}$.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • I see your point. However, in my question $A$ is smooth over some Noetherian henselian valuation ring with uniformizer $x$ (I should have made it clear the valuation ring is non-archimedean: at least I always mean that), and the ideal $I$ should be the extension of the principal maximal ideal of the valuation ring, ie. $xA$. In my question, I am thinking about $R = mathbf{Z}_{(p)}^h$, $A$ smooth over $R$, $I = pA$. I have edited my final question to only include this case
            – Ben
            Dec 9 at 19:37








          • 1




            Sorry, I misunderstood the question. But I think you can make a variant of the above counterexample work with $A = mathbb{Z}_p[t]$ and $a in mathbb{Q}_psetminus mathbb{Z}_p$. However, in your particular case ($mathbb{Z}_{(p)}$ rather than the $p$-adics), it seems that the rings are countable, so there are only countably many f.p. etale algebras over them, no?
            – Piotr Achinger
            Dec 9 at 19:51








          • 1




            More precisely, the variant with $p$-adics would be: $A=mathbb{Z}_p[x]$, $I=(p)$ and for $a = c/p^n in mathbb{Q}_p$ with $cinmathbb{Z}^times_p$ and $n>0$, the algebra $A[1/(p^n x-c)]$.
            – Piotr Achinger
            Dec 9 at 20:03
















          4














          No.



          Take $A = mathbb{C}[x]$ and $I=(x)$. Suppose that $A^h$ is the direct limit of a system of etale algebras $A_i$ such that $A_i/(x) cong mathbb{C}$. We can assume that each $A_i$ is finitely presented.



          For $ain mathbb{C}setminus {0}$, consider the algebra $A[1/(x-a)]$. Then:



          (1) for every nonzero $ain mathbb{C}$, the map $Ato A^h$ factors through $A[1/(x-a)]$ (by universal property of henselization)



          (2) for every index $i$, there are only finitely many nonzero $ain mathbb{C}$ for which $Ato A_i$ factors through $A[1/(x-a)]$ (because the image of ${rm Spec}(A_i) to {rm Spec}(A)$ is open and dense).



          This shows that the index set has to have cardinality at least equal to the cardinality of $mathbb{C}$.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • I see your point. However, in my question $A$ is smooth over some Noetherian henselian valuation ring with uniformizer $x$ (I should have made it clear the valuation ring is non-archimedean: at least I always mean that), and the ideal $I$ should be the extension of the principal maximal ideal of the valuation ring, ie. $xA$. In my question, I am thinking about $R = mathbf{Z}_{(p)}^h$, $A$ smooth over $R$, $I = pA$. I have edited my final question to only include this case
            – Ben
            Dec 9 at 19:37








          • 1




            Sorry, I misunderstood the question. But I think you can make a variant of the above counterexample work with $A = mathbb{Z}_p[t]$ and $a in mathbb{Q}_psetminus mathbb{Z}_p$. However, in your particular case ($mathbb{Z}_{(p)}$ rather than the $p$-adics), it seems that the rings are countable, so there are only countably many f.p. etale algebras over them, no?
            – Piotr Achinger
            Dec 9 at 19:51








          • 1




            More precisely, the variant with $p$-adics would be: $A=mathbb{Z}_p[x]$, $I=(p)$ and for $a = c/p^n in mathbb{Q}_p$ with $cinmathbb{Z}^times_p$ and $n>0$, the algebra $A[1/(p^n x-c)]$.
            – Piotr Achinger
            Dec 9 at 20:03














          4












          4








          4






          No.



          Take $A = mathbb{C}[x]$ and $I=(x)$. Suppose that $A^h$ is the direct limit of a system of etale algebras $A_i$ such that $A_i/(x) cong mathbb{C}$. We can assume that each $A_i$ is finitely presented.



          For $ain mathbb{C}setminus {0}$, consider the algebra $A[1/(x-a)]$. Then:



          (1) for every nonzero $ain mathbb{C}$, the map $Ato A^h$ factors through $A[1/(x-a)]$ (by universal property of henselization)



          (2) for every index $i$, there are only finitely many nonzero $ain mathbb{C}$ for which $Ato A_i$ factors through $A[1/(x-a)]$ (because the image of ${rm Spec}(A_i) to {rm Spec}(A)$ is open and dense).



          This shows that the index set has to have cardinality at least equal to the cardinality of $mathbb{C}$.






          share|cite|improve this answer












          No.



          Take $A = mathbb{C}[x]$ and $I=(x)$. Suppose that $A^h$ is the direct limit of a system of etale algebras $A_i$ such that $A_i/(x) cong mathbb{C}$. We can assume that each $A_i$ is finitely presented.



          For $ain mathbb{C}setminus {0}$, consider the algebra $A[1/(x-a)]$. Then:



          (1) for every nonzero $ain mathbb{C}$, the map $Ato A^h$ factors through $A[1/(x-a)]$ (by universal property of henselization)



          (2) for every index $i$, there are only finitely many nonzero $ain mathbb{C}$ for which $Ato A_i$ factors through $A[1/(x-a)]$ (because the image of ${rm Spec}(A_i) to {rm Spec}(A)$ is open and dense).



          This shows that the index set has to have cardinality at least equal to the cardinality of $mathbb{C}$.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Dec 9 at 19:24









          Piotr Achinger

          8,17312752




          8,17312752












          • I see your point. However, in my question $A$ is smooth over some Noetherian henselian valuation ring with uniformizer $x$ (I should have made it clear the valuation ring is non-archimedean: at least I always mean that), and the ideal $I$ should be the extension of the principal maximal ideal of the valuation ring, ie. $xA$. In my question, I am thinking about $R = mathbf{Z}_{(p)}^h$, $A$ smooth over $R$, $I = pA$. I have edited my final question to only include this case
            – Ben
            Dec 9 at 19:37








          • 1




            Sorry, I misunderstood the question. But I think you can make a variant of the above counterexample work with $A = mathbb{Z}_p[t]$ and $a in mathbb{Q}_psetminus mathbb{Z}_p$. However, in your particular case ($mathbb{Z}_{(p)}$ rather than the $p$-adics), it seems that the rings are countable, so there are only countably many f.p. etale algebras over them, no?
            – Piotr Achinger
            Dec 9 at 19:51








          • 1




            More precisely, the variant with $p$-adics would be: $A=mathbb{Z}_p[x]$, $I=(p)$ and for $a = c/p^n in mathbb{Q}_p$ with $cinmathbb{Z}^times_p$ and $n>0$, the algebra $A[1/(p^n x-c)]$.
            – Piotr Achinger
            Dec 9 at 20:03


















          • I see your point. However, in my question $A$ is smooth over some Noetherian henselian valuation ring with uniformizer $x$ (I should have made it clear the valuation ring is non-archimedean: at least I always mean that), and the ideal $I$ should be the extension of the principal maximal ideal of the valuation ring, ie. $xA$. In my question, I am thinking about $R = mathbf{Z}_{(p)}^h$, $A$ smooth over $R$, $I = pA$. I have edited my final question to only include this case
            – Ben
            Dec 9 at 19:37








          • 1




            Sorry, I misunderstood the question. But I think you can make a variant of the above counterexample work with $A = mathbb{Z}_p[t]$ and $a in mathbb{Q}_psetminus mathbb{Z}_p$. However, in your particular case ($mathbb{Z}_{(p)}$ rather than the $p$-adics), it seems that the rings are countable, so there are only countably many f.p. etale algebras over them, no?
            – Piotr Achinger
            Dec 9 at 19:51








          • 1




            More precisely, the variant with $p$-adics would be: $A=mathbb{Z}_p[x]$, $I=(p)$ and for $a = c/p^n in mathbb{Q}_p$ with $cinmathbb{Z}^times_p$ and $n>0$, the algebra $A[1/(p^n x-c)]$.
            – Piotr Achinger
            Dec 9 at 20:03
















          I see your point. However, in my question $A$ is smooth over some Noetherian henselian valuation ring with uniformizer $x$ (I should have made it clear the valuation ring is non-archimedean: at least I always mean that), and the ideal $I$ should be the extension of the principal maximal ideal of the valuation ring, ie. $xA$. In my question, I am thinking about $R = mathbf{Z}_{(p)}^h$, $A$ smooth over $R$, $I = pA$. I have edited my final question to only include this case
          – Ben
          Dec 9 at 19:37






          I see your point. However, in my question $A$ is smooth over some Noetherian henselian valuation ring with uniformizer $x$ (I should have made it clear the valuation ring is non-archimedean: at least I always mean that), and the ideal $I$ should be the extension of the principal maximal ideal of the valuation ring, ie. $xA$. In my question, I am thinking about $R = mathbf{Z}_{(p)}^h$, $A$ smooth over $R$, $I = pA$. I have edited my final question to only include this case
          – Ben
          Dec 9 at 19:37






          1




          1




          Sorry, I misunderstood the question. But I think you can make a variant of the above counterexample work with $A = mathbb{Z}_p[t]$ and $a in mathbb{Q}_psetminus mathbb{Z}_p$. However, in your particular case ($mathbb{Z}_{(p)}$ rather than the $p$-adics), it seems that the rings are countable, so there are only countably many f.p. etale algebras over them, no?
          – Piotr Achinger
          Dec 9 at 19:51






          Sorry, I misunderstood the question. But I think you can make a variant of the above counterexample work with $A = mathbb{Z}_p[t]$ and $a in mathbb{Q}_psetminus mathbb{Z}_p$. However, in your particular case ($mathbb{Z}_{(p)}$ rather than the $p$-adics), it seems that the rings are countable, so there are only countably many f.p. etale algebras over them, no?
          – Piotr Achinger
          Dec 9 at 19:51






          1




          1




          More precisely, the variant with $p$-adics would be: $A=mathbb{Z}_p[x]$, $I=(p)$ and for $a = c/p^n in mathbb{Q}_p$ with $cinmathbb{Z}^times_p$ and $n>0$, the algebra $A[1/(p^n x-c)]$.
          – Piotr Achinger
          Dec 9 at 20:03




          More precisely, the variant with $p$-adics would be: $A=mathbb{Z}_p[x]$, $I=(p)$ and for $a = c/p^n in mathbb{Q}_p$ with $cinmathbb{Z}^times_p$ and $n>0$, the algebra $A[1/(p^n x-c)]$.
          – Piotr Achinger
          Dec 9 at 20:03


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to MathOverflow!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f317261%2fhenselianizations-over-countable-index-sets%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Quarter-circle Tiles

          build a pushdown automaton that recognizes the reverse language of a given pushdown automaton?

          Mont Emei