Standard Cartesian Plane
I have posted before.
But I had a question,
Is the **standard, ** used cartesian coordinate plane this:
Where the vertical axis represents $f(x) = y$ and the horizontal axis represents $x$?
I was wondering because in evaluation of
$$I = int_{-infty}^{infty} e^{-x^2} dx$$
We take:
$$I = int_{-infty}^{infty} e^{-y^2} dy$$
Then we take $I^2$.
Are you then using $f(y) = e^{-y^2}$ or just changing $x to y$ ?? So $y$ is the independent variable?
calculus functions
edited Jan 6 '15 at 18:02
Mark Fantini
4,84041935
asked Jan 6 '15 at 17:56
anonymous
12727
|
show 1 more comment
I have posted before.
But I had a question,
Is the **standard, ** used cartesian coordinate plane this:
Where the vertical axis represents $f(x) = y$ and the horizontal axis represents $x$?
I was wondering because in evaluation of
$$I = int_{-infty}^{infty} e^{-x^2} dx$$
We take:
$$I = int_{-infty}^{infty} e^{-y^2} dy$$
Then we take $I^2$.
Are you then using $f(y) = e^{-y^2}$ or just changing $x to y$ ?? So $y$ is the independent variable?
calculus functions
edited Jan 6 '15 at 18:02
Mark Fantini
4,84041935
asked Jan 6 '15 at 17:56
anonymous
12727
1
The vertical axis is the set of points $(x,y) in mathbb{R}^2$ such that $x=0$. The set of points such that $y=f(x)$ represents a curve in the $xy$ plane. Would it make you feel better if we wrote $$I = int_{- infty}^{+ infty} e^{-t^2} , dt$$ and $$I = int_{- infty}^{+ infty} e^{- w^2} , dw?$$ We use $x$ and $y$ because of inertia in switching to polar coordinates. In the example I gave we can write $t = r cos(theta), w = r sin(theta)$, but for some reason some people aren't comfortable with that and think only $x$ and $y$ can be written in polar coordinates.
– Mark Fantini
Jan 6 '15 at 18:01
But the problem is, when you combine it, when it becomes an iterated integral, then do you have a $3D$ plot of the curve? It becomes $e^{-(t^2 + w^2)}$ but you cant have a $3D$ plot because the nor $w$ nor $t$ are the vertical axis in the 2D graph.
– anonymous
Jan 6 '15 at 18:04
It's no longer a curve, it becomes a surface.
– Mark Fantini
Jan 6 '15 at 18:07
Exactly, how? Given: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/… Then one of the axes must be $y$ for example, and one of the axes must be $x$ for it to be a 3D system, and a surface.?
– anonymous
Jan 6 '15 at 18:08
@MarkFantini, do you see? In the 3D plane there is a seperate $xy$ plane, so if we have $e^{-(x^2 + y^2)}$ there then the issue would be that either $y$ is a dependent variable for $x$ or either $x$ is a dependent variable for $y$.
– anonymous
Jan 6 '15 at 18:13
|
show 1 more comment
I have posted before.
But I had a question,
Is the **standard, ** used cartesian coordinate plane this:
Where the vertical axis represents $f(x) = y$ and the horizontal axis represents $x$?
I was wondering because in evaluation of
$$I = int_{-infty}^{infty} e^{-x^2} dx$$
We take:
$$I = int_{-infty}^{infty} e^{-y^2} dy$$
Then we take $I^2$.
Are you then using $f(y) = e^{-y^2}$ or just changing $x to y$ ?? So $y$ is the independent variable?
calculus functions
edited Jan 6 '15 at 18:02
Mark Fantini
4,84041935
asked Jan 6 '15 at 17:56
anonymous
12727
I have posted before.
But I had a question,
Is the **standard, ** used cartesian coordinate plane this:
Where the vertical axis represents $f(x) = y$ and the horizontal axis represents $x$?
I was wondering because in evaluation of
$$I = int_{-infty}^{infty} e^{-x^2} dx$$
We take:
$$I = int_{-infty}^{infty} e^{-y^2} dy$$
Then we take $I^2$.
Are you then using $f(y) = e^{-y^2}$ or just changing $x to y$ ?? So $y$ is the independent variable?
calculus functions
calculus functions
edited Jan 6 '15 at 18:02
Mark Fantini
4,84041935
asked Jan 6 '15 at 17:56
anonymous
12727
edited Jan 6 '15 at 18:02
Mark Fantini
4,84041935
asked Jan 6 '15 at 17:56
anonymous
12727
edited Jan 6 '15 at 18:02
Mark Fantini
4,84041935
edited Jan 6 '15 at 18:02
Mark Fantini
4,84041935
edited Jan 6 '15 at 18:02
Mark Fantini
4,84041935
4,84041935
asked Jan 6 '15 at 17:56
anonymous
12727
asked Jan 6 '15 at 17:56
anonymous
12727
asked Jan 6 '15 at 17:56
anonymous
12727
12727
1
The vertical axis is the set of points $(x,y) in mathbb{R}^2$ such that $x=0$. The set of points such that $y=f(x)$ represents a curve in the $xy$ plane. Would it make you feel better if we wrote $$I = int_{- infty}^{+ infty} e^{-t^2} , dt$$ and $$I = int_{- infty}^{+ infty} e^{- w^2} , dw?$$ We use $x$ and $y$ because of inertia in switching to polar coordinates. In the example I gave we can write $t = r cos(theta), w = r sin(theta)$, but for some reason some people aren't comfortable with that and think only $x$ and $y$ can be written in polar coordinates.
– Mark Fantini
Jan 6 '15 at 18:01
But the problem is, when you combine it, when it becomes an iterated integral, then do you have a $3D$ plot of the curve? It becomes $e^{-(t^2 + w^2)}$ but you cant have a $3D$ plot because the nor $w$ nor $t$ are the vertical axis in the 2D graph.
– anonymous
Jan 6 '15 at 18:04
It's no longer a curve, it becomes a surface.
– Mark Fantini
Jan 6 '15 at 18:07
Exactly, how? Given: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/… Then one of the axes must be $y$ for example, and one of the axes must be $x$ for it to be a 3D system, and a surface.?
– anonymous
Jan 6 '15 at 18:08
@MarkFantini, do you see? In the 3D plane there is a seperate $xy$ plane, so if we have $e^{-(x^2 + y^2)}$ there then the issue would be that either $y$ is a dependent variable for $x$ or either $x$ is a dependent variable for $y$.
– anonymous
Jan 6 '15 at 18:13
|
show 1 more comment
1
The vertical axis is the set of points $(x,y) in mathbb{R}^2$ such that $x=0$. The set of points such that $y=f(x)$ represents a curve in the $xy$ plane. Would it make you feel better if we wrote $$I = int_{- infty}^{+ infty} e^{-t^2} , dt$$ and $$I = int_{- infty}^{+ infty} e^{- w^2} , dw?$$ We use $x$ and $y$ because of inertia in switching to polar coordinates. In the example I gave we can write $t = r cos(theta), w = r sin(theta)$, but for some reason some people aren't comfortable with that and think only $x$ and $y$ can be written in polar coordinates.
– Mark Fantini
Jan 6 '15 at 18:01
But the problem is, when you combine it, when it becomes an iterated integral, then do you have a $3D$ plot of the curve? It becomes $e^{-(t^2 + w^2)}$ but you cant have a $3D$ plot because the nor $w$ nor $t$ are the vertical axis in the 2D graph.
– anonymous
Jan 6 '15 at 18:04
It's no longer a curve, it becomes a surface.
– Mark Fantini
Jan 6 '15 at 18:07
Exactly, how? Given: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/… Then one of the axes must be $y$ for example, and one of the axes must be $x$ for it to be a 3D system, and a surface.?
– anonymous
Jan 6 '15 at 18:08
@MarkFantini, do you see? In the 3D plane there is a seperate $xy$ plane, so if we have $e^{-(x^2 + y^2)}$ there then the issue would be that either $y$ is a dependent variable for $x$ or either $x$ is a dependent variable for $y$.
– anonymous
Jan 6 '15 at 18:13
1
1
The vertical axis is the set of points $(x,y) in mathbb{R}^2$ such that $x=0$. The set of points such that $y=f(x)$ represents a curve in the $xy$ plane. Would it make you feel better if we wrote $$I = int_{- infty}^{+ infty} e^{-t^2} , dt$$ and $$I = int_{- infty}^{+ infty} e^{- w^2} , dw?$$ We use $x$ and $y$ because of inertia in switching to polar coordinates. In the example I gave we can write $t = r cos(theta), w = r sin(theta)$, but for some reason some people aren't comfortable with that and think only $x$ and $y$ can be written in polar coordinates.
– Mark Fantini
Jan 6 '15 at 18:01
The vertical axis is the set of points $(x,y) in mathbb{R}^2$ such that $x=0$. The set of points such that $y=f(x)$ represents a curve in the $xy$ plane. Would it make you feel better if we wrote $$I = int_{- infty}^{+ infty} e^{-t^2} , dt$$ and $$I = int_{- infty}^{+ infty} e^{- w^2} , dw?$$ We use $x$ and $y$ because of inertia in switching to polar coordinates. In the example I gave we can write $t = r cos(theta), w = r sin(theta)$, but for some reason some people aren't comfortable with that and think only $x$ and $y$ can be written in polar coordinates.
– Mark Fantini
Jan 6 '15 at 18:01
But the problem is, when you combine it, when it becomes an iterated integral, then do you have a $3D$ plot of the curve? It becomes $e^{-(t^2 + w^2)}$ but you cant have a $3D$ plot because the nor $w$ nor $t$ are the vertical axis in the 2D graph.
– anonymous
Jan 6 '15 at 18:04
But the problem is, when you combine it, when it becomes an iterated integral, then do you have a $3D$ plot of the curve? It becomes $e^{-(t^2 + w^2)}$ but you cant have a $3D$ plot because the nor $w$ nor $t$ are the vertical axis in the 2D graph.
– anonymous
Jan 6 '15 at 18:04
It's no longer a curve, it becomes a surface.
– Mark Fantini
Jan 6 '15 at 18:07
It's no longer a curve, it becomes a surface.
– Mark Fantini
Jan 6 '15 at 18:07
Exactly, how? Given: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/… Then one of the axes must be $y$ for example, and one of the axes must be $x$ for it to be a 3D system, and a surface.?
– anonymous
Jan 6 '15 at 18:08
Exactly, how? Given: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/… Then one of the axes must be $y$ for example, and one of the axes must be $x$ for it to be a 3D system, and a surface.?
– anonymous
Jan 6 '15 at 18:08
@MarkFantini, do you see? In the 3D plane there is a seperate $xy$ plane, so if we have $e^{-(x^2 + y^2)}$ there then the issue would be that either $y$ is a dependent variable for $x$ or either $x$ is a dependent variable for $y$.
– anonymous
Jan 6 '15 at 18:13
@MarkFantini, do you see? In the 3D plane there is a seperate $xy$ plane, so if we have $e^{-(x^2 + y^2)}$ there then the issue would be that either $y$ is a dependent variable for $x$ or either $x$ is a dependent variable for $y$.
– anonymous
Jan 6 '15 at 18:13
|
show 1 more comment
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
What you appear to be looking at is
the usual way to evaluate $I=int_{-infty}^{infty} f(x);dx$
where $f(x)=e^{-x^2}.$
We show that
$$begin{eqnarray}
I^2 &=& left(int_{-infty}^{infty} f(x);dxright)
left(int_{-infty}^{infty} f(y);dyright)\
&=& int_{-infty}^{infty}int_{-infty}^{infty} f(x) f(y);dx;dy \
&=& int_{-infty}^{infty}int_{-infty}^{infty} g(x,y);dx;dy.
end{eqnarray}$$
That is, instead of doing a single integration of the single-variable
function $f$, we do a double integration of the two-variable function $g$,
where $g(x,y)=e^{-(x^2+y^2)}.$
Then we change variables to polar coordinates in order to put
the integral in a form that's much easier to evaluate.
While we can make a simple and reasonably complete graph of $y = f(x)$
in the $x,y$-plane consisting of one or more simple curves
that pass the "vertical line" test
(at least for reasonable functions $f$ such as the functions one uses for most practical purposes),
we cannot graph a multivariable function $g(x,y)$ that way,
because $g(x,y)$ assigns a value to every point in its domain,
in this case every point in the plane.
There are various other ways of plotting $g(x,y)$, but they involve
different techniques such as three-dimensional visualization,
contour lines, or other techniques to indicate that the function does
not just have a single value for any given $x$, but rather has a value for
every combination of $x$ and $y$.
I am reminded of this question, which is different from yours
but also hinges on the confusion that can occur if one tries to apply
principles of graphing single-variable functions
to a problem concerning a multiple-variable function.
Both single-variable and multiple-variable functions can be related
to the same $x,y$-coordinate plane, but they relate to that plane
in very different ways.
edited Apr 13 '17 at 12:21
Community♦
1
answered Jan 7 '15 at 20:47
David K
52.4k340115
I do not understand some things here.How does $f(x)f(y) = g(x,y)$ $x$ and $y$ are collinear points on the axis.
– anonymous
Jan 8 '15 at 13:21
In $int_{-infty}^{infty} f(x);dx$, the symbol $x$ is a name for the variable of integration. It is not a point, though sometimes it is helpful to relate values of $x$ to labeled points on the $x$-axis of a graph. The notation $g(x,y)$ in the equations is there merely to remind us that when we set up the double integral, the integrand is a function of two variables instead of just one.
– David K
Jan 8 '15 at 17:27
It is a new function right? you didnt transform the single variable functions into one, you created a new function, in that form? Also, the formal reason why we can change is because these are BOUND variables right? By definition we are allowed to change the variables: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_variables_and_bound_variables
– anonymous
Jan 8 '15 at 17:44
Yes, $g$ is a new function. And yes, it is important that in these integrals, $x$ and $y$ are bound variables.
– David K
Jan 8 '15 at 18:24
Okay, so how does $x^2+ y^2 = r^2$ when converting it into polar?
– anonymous
Jan 9 '15 at 12:36
|
show 1 more comment
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1093289%2fstandard-cartesian-plane%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
What you appear to be looking at is
the usual way to evaluate $I=int_{-infty}^{infty} f(x);dx$
where $f(x)=e^{-x^2}.$
We show that
$$begin{eqnarray}
I^2 &=& left(int_{-infty}^{infty} f(x);dxright)
left(int_{-infty}^{infty} f(y);dyright)\
&=& int_{-infty}^{infty}int_{-infty}^{infty} f(x) f(y);dx;dy \
&=& int_{-infty}^{infty}int_{-infty}^{infty} g(x,y);dx;dy.
end{eqnarray}$$
That is, instead of doing a single integration of the single-variable
function $f$, we do a double integration of the two-variable function $g$,
where $g(x,y)=e^{-(x^2+y^2)}.$
Then we change variables to polar coordinates in order to put
the integral in a form that's much easier to evaluate.
While we can make a simple and reasonably complete graph of $y = f(x)$
in the $x,y$-plane consisting of one or more simple curves
that pass the "vertical line" test
(at least for reasonable functions $f$ such as the functions one uses for most practical purposes),
we cannot graph a multivariable function $g(x,y)$ that way,
because $g(x,y)$ assigns a value to every point in its domain,
in this case every point in the plane.
There are various other ways of plotting $g(x,y)$, but they involve
different techniques such as three-dimensional visualization,
contour lines, or other techniques to indicate that the function does
not just have a single value for any given $x$, but rather has a value for
every combination of $x$ and $y$.
I am reminded of this question, which is different from yours
but also hinges on the confusion that can occur if one tries to apply
principles of graphing single-variable functions
to a problem concerning a multiple-variable function.
Both single-variable and multiple-variable functions can be related
to the same $x,y$-coordinate plane, but they relate to that plane
in very different ways.
edited Apr 13 '17 at 12:21
Community♦
1
answered Jan 7 '15 at 20:47
David K
52.4k340115
I do not understand some things here.How does $f(x)f(y) = g(x,y)$ $x$ and $y$ are collinear points on the axis.
– anonymous
Jan 8 '15 at 13:21
In $int_{-infty}^{infty} f(x);dx$, the symbol $x$ is a name for the variable of integration. It is not a point, though sometimes it is helpful to relate values of $x$ to labeled points on the $x$-axis of a graph. The notation $g(x,y)$ in the equations is there merely to remind us that when we set up the double integral, the integrand is a function of two variables instead of just one.
– David K
Jan 8 '15 at 17:27
It is a new function right? you didnt transform the single variable functions into one, you created a new function, in that form? Also, the formal reason why we can change is because these are BOUND variables right? By definition we are allowed to change the variables: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_variables_and_bound_variables
– anonymous
Jan 8 '15 at 17:44
Yes, $g$ is a new function. And yes, it is important that in these integrals, $x$ and $y$ are bound variables.
– David K
Jan 8 '15 at 18:24
Okay, so how does $x^2+ y^2 = r^2$ when converting it into polar?
– anonymous
Jan 9 '15 at 12:36
|
show 1 more comment
What you appear to be looking at is
the usual way to evaluate $I=int_{-infty}^{infty} f(x);dx$
where $f(x)=e^{-x^2}.$
We show that
$$begin{eqnarray}
I^2 &=& left(int_{-infty}^{infty} f(x);dxright)
left(int_{-infty}^{infty} f(y);dyright)\
&=& int_{-infty}^{infty}int_{-infty}^{infty} f(x) f(y);dx;dy \
&=& int_{-infty}^{infty}int_{-infty}^{infty} g(x,y);dx;dy.
end{eqnarray}$$
That is, instead of doing a single integration of the single-variable
function $f$, we do a double integration of the two-variable function $g$,
where $g(x,y)=e^{-(x^2+y^2)}.$
Then we change variables to polar coordinates in order to put
the integral in a form that's much easier to evaluate.
While we can make a simple and reasonably complete graph of $y = f(x)$
in the $x,y$-plane consisting of one or more simple curves
that pass the "vertical line" test
(at least for reasonable functions $f$ such as the functions one uses for most practical purposes),
we cannot graph a multivariable function $g(x,y)$ that way,
because $g(x,y)$ assigns a value to every point in its domain,
in this case every point in the plane.
There are various other ways of plotting $g(x,y)$, but they involve
different techniques such as three-dimensional visualization,
contour lines, or other techniques to indicate that the function does
not just have a single value for any given $x$, but rather has a value for
every combination of $x$ and $y$.
I am reminded of this question, which is different from yours
but also hinges on the confusion that can occur if one tries to apply
principles of graphing single-variable functions
to a problem concerning a multiple-variable function.
Both single-variable and multiple-variable functions can be related
to the same $x,y$-coordinate plane, but they relate to that plane
in very different ways.
edited Apr 13 '17 at 12:21
Community♦
1
answered Jan 7 '15 at 20:47
David K
52.4k340115
I do not understand some things here.How does $f(x)f(y) = g(x,y)$ $x$ and $y$ are collinear points on the axis.
– anonymous
Jan 8 '15 at 13:21
In $int_{-infty}^{infty} f(x);dx$, the symbol $x$ is a name for the variable of integration. It is not a point, though sometimes it is helpful to relate values of $x$ to labeled points on the $x$-axis of a graph. The notation $g(x,y)$ in the equations is there merely to remind us that when we set up the double integral, the integrand is a function of two variables instead of just one.
– David K
Jan 8 '15 at 17:27
It is a new function right? you didnt transform the single variable functions into one, you created a new function, in that form? Also, the formal reason why we can change is because these are BOUND variables right? By definition we are allowed to change the variables: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_variables_and_bound_variables
– anonymous
Jan 8 '15 at 17:44
Yes, $g$ is a new function. And yes, it is important that in these integrals, $x$ and $y$ are bound variables.
– David K
Jan 8 '15 at 18:24
Okay, so how does $x^2+ y^2 = r^2$ when converting it into polar?
– anonymous
Jan 9 '15 at 12:36
|
show 1 more comment
What you appear to be looking at is
the usual way to evaluate $I=int_{-infty}^{infty} f(x);dx$
where $f(x)=e^{-x^2}.$
We show that
$$begin{eqnarray}
I^2 &=& left(int_{-infty}^{infty} f(x);dxright)
left(int_{-infty}^{infty} f(y);dyright)\
&=& int_{-infty}^{infty}int_{-infty}^{infty} f(x) f(y);dx;dy \
&=& int_{-infty}^{infty}int_{-infty}^{infty} g(x,y);dx;dy.
end{eqnarray}$$
That is, instead of doing a single integration of the single-variable
function $f$, we do a double integration of the two-variable function $g$,
where $g(x,y)=e^{-(x^2+y^2)}.$
Then we change variables to polar coordinates in order to put
the integral in a form that's much easier to evaluate.
While we can make a simple and reasonably complete graph of $y = f(x)$
in the $x,y$-plane consisting of one or more simple curves
that pass the "vertical line" test
(at least for reasonable functions $f$ such as the functions one uses for most practical purposes),
we cannot graph a multivariable function $g(x,y)$ that way,
because $g(x,y)$ assigns a value to every point in its domain,
in this case every point in the plane.
There are various other ways of plotting $g(x,y)$, but they involve
different techniques such as three-dimensional visualization,
contour lines, or other techniques to indicate that the function does
not just have a single value for any given $x$, but rather has a value for
every combination of $x$ and $y$.
I am reminded of this question, which is different from yours
but also hinges on the confusion that can occur if one tries to apply
principles of graphing single-variable functions
to a problem concerning a multiple-variable function.
Both single-variable and multiple-variable functions can be related
to the same $x,y$-coordinate plane, but they relate to that plane
in very different ways.
edited Apr 13 '17 at 12:21
Community♦
1
answered Jan 7 '15 at 20:47
David K
52.4k340115
What you appear to be looking at is
the usual way to evaluate $I=int_{-infty}^{infty} f(x);dx$
where $f(x)=e^{-x^2}.$
We show that
$$begin{eqnarray}
I^2 &=& left(int_{-infty}^{infty} f(x);dxright)
left(int_{-infty}^{infty} f(y);dyright)\
&=& int_{-infty}^{infty}int_{-infty}^{infty} f(x) f(y);dx;dy \
&=& int_{-infty}^{infty}int_{-infty}^{infty} g(x,y);dx;dy.
end{eqnarray}$$
That is, instead of doing a single integration of the single-variable
function $f$, we do a double integration of the two-variable function $g$,
where $g(x,y)=e^{-(x^2+y^2)}.$
Then we change variables to polar coordinates in order to put
the integral in a form that's much easier to evaluate.
While we can make a simple and reasonably complete graph of $y = f(x)$
in the $x,y$-plane consisting of one or more simple curves
that pass the "vertical line" test
(at least for reasonable functions $f$ such as the functions one uses for most practical purposes),
we cannot graph a multivariable function $g(x,y)$ that way,
because $g(x,y)$ assigns a value to every point in its domain,
in this case every point in the plane.
There are various other ways of plotting $g(x,y)$, but they involve
different techniques such as three-dimensional visualization,
contour lines, or other techniques to indicate that the function does
not just have a single value for any given $x$, but rather has a value for
every combination of $x$ and $y$.
I am reminded of this question, which is different from yours
but also hinges on the confusion that can occur if one tries to apply
principles of graphing single-variable functions
to a problem concerning a multiple-variable function.
Both single-variable and multiple-variable functions can be related
to the same $x,y$-coordinate plane, but they relate to that plane
in very different ways.
edited Apr 13 '17 at 12:21
Community♦
1
answered Jan 7 '15 at 20:47
David K
52.4k340115
edited Apr 13 '17 at 12:21
Community♦
1
edited Apr 13 '17 at 12:21
Community♦
1
edited Apr 13 '17 at 12:21
Community♦
1
1
answered Jan 7 '15 at 20:47
David K
52.4k340115
answered Jan 7 '15 at 20:47
David K
52.4k340115
answered Jan 7 '15 at 20:47
David K
52.4k340115
52.4k340115
I do not understand some things here.How does $f(x)f(y) = g(x,y)$ $x$ and $y$ are collinear points on the axis.
– anonymous
Jan 8 '15 at 13:21
In $int_{-infty}^{infty} f(x);dx$, the symbol $x$ is a name for the variable of integration. It is not a point, though sometimes it is helpful to relate values of $x$ to labeled points on the $x$-axis of a graph. The notation $g(x,y)$ in the equations is there merely to remind us that when we set up the double integral, the integrand is a function of two variables instead of just one.
– David K
Jan 8 '15 at 17:27
It is a new function right? you didnt transform the single variable functions into one, you created a new function, in that form? Also, the formal reason why we can change is because these are BOUND variables right? By definition we are allowed to change the variables: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_variables_and_bound_variables
– anonymous
Jan 8 '15 at 17:44
Yes, $g$ is a new function. And yes, it is important that in these integrals, $x$ and $y$ are bound variables.
– David K
Jan 8 '15 at 18:24
Okay, so how does $x^2+ y^2 = r^2$ when converting it into polar?
– anonymous
Jan 9 '15 at 12:36
|
show 1 more comment
I do not understand some things here.How does $f(x)f(y) = g(x,y)$ $x$ and $y$ are collinear points on the axis.
– anonymous
Jan 8 '15 at 13:21
In $int_{-infty}^{infty} f(x);dx$, the symbol $x$ is a name for the variable of integration. It is not a point, though sometimes it is helpful to relate values of $x$ to labeled points on the $x$-axis of a graph. The notation $g(x,y)$ in the equations is there merely to remind us that when we set up the double integral, the integrand is a function of two variables instead of just one.
– David K
Jan 8 '15 at 17:27
It is a new function right? you didnt transform the single variable functions into one, you created a new function, in that form? Also, the formal reason why we can change is because these are BOUND variables right? By definition we are allowed to change the variables: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_variables_and_bound_variables
– anonymous
Jan 8 '15 at 17:44
Yes, $g$ is a new function. And yes, it is important that in these integrals, $x$ and $y$ are bound variables.
– David K
Jan 8 '15 at 18:24
Okay, so how does $x^2+ y^2 = r^2$ when converting it into polar?
– anonymous
Jan 9 '15 at 12:36
I do not understand some things here.How does $f(x)f(y) = g(x,y)$ $x$ and $y$ are collinear points on the axis.
– anonymous
Jan 8 '15 at 13:21
I do not understand some things here.How does $f(x)f(y) = g(x,y)$ $x$ and $y$ are collinear points on the axis.
– anonymous
Jan 8 '15 at 13:21
In $int_{-infty}^{infty} f(x);dx$, the symbol $x$ is a name for the variable of integration. It is not a point, though sometimes it is helpful to relate values of $x$ to labeled points on the $x$-axis of a graph. The notation $g(x,y)$ in the equations is there merely to remind us that when we set up the double integral, the integrand is a function of two variables instead of just one.
– David K
Jan 8 '15 at 17:27
In $int_{-infty}^{infty} f(x);dx$, the symbol $x$ is a name for the variable of integration. It is not a point, though sometimes it is helpful to relate values of $x$ to labeled points on the $x$-axis of a graph. The notation $g(x,y)$ in the equations is there merely to remind us that when we set up the double integral, the integrand is a function of two variables instead of just one.
– David K
Jan 8 '15 at 17:27
It is a new function right? you didnt transform the single variable functions into one, you created a new function, in that form? Also, the formal reason why we can change is because these are BOUND variables right? By definition we are allowed to change the variables: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_variables_and_bound_variables
– anonymous
Jan 8 '15 at 17:44
It is a new function right? you didnt transform the single variable functions into one, you created a new function, in that form? Also, the formal reason why we can change is because these are BOUND variables right? By definition we are allowed to change the variables: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_variables_and_bound_variables
– anonymous
Jan 8 '15 at 17:44
Yes, $g$ is a new function. And yes, it is important that in these integrals, $x$ and $y$ are bound variables.
– David K
Jan 8 '15 at 18:24
Yes, $g$ is a new function. And yes, it is important that in these integrals, $x$ and $y$ are bound variables.
– David K
Jan 8 '15 at 18:24
Okay, so how does $x^2+ y^2 = r^2$ when converting it into polar?
– anonymous
Jan 9 '15 at 12:36
Okay, so how does $x^2+ y^2 = r^2$ when converting it into polar?
– anonymous
Jan 9 '15 at 12:36
|
show 1 more comment
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1093289%2fstandard-cartesian-plane%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
The vertical axis is the set of points $(x,y) in mathbb{R}^2$ such that $x=0$. The set of points such that $y=f(x)$ represents a curve in the $xy$ plane. Would it make you feel better if we wrote $$I = int_{- infty}^{+ infty} e^{-t^2} , dt$$ and $$I = int_{- infty}^{+ infty} e^{- w^2} , dw?$$ We use $x$ and $y$ because of inertia in switching to polar coordinates. In the example I gave we can write $t = r cos(theta), w = r sin(theta)$, but for some reason some people aren't comfortable with that and think only $x$ and $y$ can be written in polar coordinates.
– Mark Fantini
Jan 6 '15 at 18:01
But the problem is, when you combine it, when it becomes an iterated integral, then do you have a $3D$ plot of the curve? It becomes $e^{-(t^2 + w^2)}$ but you cant have a $3D$ plot because the nor $w$ nor $t$ are the vertical axis in the 2D graph.
– anonymous
Jan 6 '15 at 18:04
It's no longer a curve, it becomes a surface.
– Mark Fantini
Jan 6 '15 at 18:07
Exactly, how? Given: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/… Then one of the axes must be $y$ for example, and one of the axes must be $x$ for it to be a 3D system, and a surface.?
– anonymous
Jan 6 '15 at 18:08
@MarkFantini, do you see? In the 3D plane there is a seperate $xy$ plane, so if we have $e^{-(x^2 + y^2)}$ there then the issue would be that either $y$ is a dependent variable for $x$ or either $x$ is a dependent variable for $y$.
– anonymous
Jan 6 '15 at 18:13