integral f(-x) from -a to a equal to integral f(x) from -a to a
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Can someone help with a short algebraic proof that $int_{-a}^ag(x)=int_{-a}^ag(-x)$
From making a sketch this seems to be correct and you could argue from the graph that it would be correct as the function is mirrored in the y-axis. However, I would like to have a short argument that goes better on paper and is more precise. If someone knows where to find an example I would appreciate it a lot.
If someone has another idea the problem arises from proving $frac{1}{2pi}int_{-pi}^{pi}f(x)cdot exp({inx})=frac{1}{2pi}int_{-pi}^{pi}f(-x)cdot exp{(in(-x))}$
Where $i$ is the imaginary number, $n$ is an integer and $f(x)$ is a piecewise differentiable $2pi$ periodic function. This is part of a proof in Fourier analysis.
integration fourier-analysis periodic-functions
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Can someone help with a short algebraic proof that $int_{-a}^ag(x)=int_{-a}^ag(-x)$
From making a sketch this seems to be correct and you could argue from the graph that it would be correct as the function is mirrored in the y-axis. However, I would like to have a short argument that goes better on paper and is more precise. If someone knows where to find an example I would appreciate it a lot.
If someone has another idea the problem arises from proving $frac{1}{2pi}int_{-pi}^{pi}f(x)cdot exp({inx})=frac{1}{2pi}int_{-pi}^{pi}f(-x)cdot exp{(in(-x))}$
Where $i$ is the imaginary number, $n$ is an integer and $f(x)$ is a piecewise differentiable $2pi$ periodic function. This is part of a proof in Fourier analysis.
integration fourier-analysis periodic-functions
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Can someone help with a short algebraic proof that $int_{-a}^ag(x)=int_{-a}^ag(-x)$
From making a sketch this seems to be correct and you could argue from the graph that it would be correct as the function is mirrored in the y-axis. However, I would like to have a short argument that goes better on paper and is more precise. If someone knows where to find an example I would appreciate it a lot.
If someone has another idea the problem arises from proving $frac{1}{2pi}int_{-pi}^{pi}f(x)cdot exp({inx})=frac{1}{2pi}int_{-pi}^{pi}f(-x)cdot exp{(in(-x))}$
Where $i$ is the imaginary number, $n$ is an integer and $f(x)$ is a piecewise differentiable $2pi$ periodic function. This is part of a proof in Fourier analysis.
integration fourier-analysis periodic-functions
Can someone help with a short algebraic proof that $int_{-a}^ag(x)=int_{-a}^ag(-x)$
From making a sketch this seems to be correct and you could argue from the graph that it would be correct as the function is mirrored in the y-axis. However, I would like to have a short argument that goes better on paper and is more precise. If someone knows where to find an example I would appreciate it a lot.
If someone has another idea the problem arises from proving $frac{1}{2pi}int_{-pi}^{pi}f(x)cdot exp({inx})=frac{1}{2pi}int_{-pi}^{pi}f(-x)cdot exp{(in(-x))}$
Where $i$ is the imaginary number, $n$ is an integer and $f(x)$ is a piecewise differentiable $2pi$ periodic function. This is part of a proof in Fourier analysis.
integration fourier-analysis periodic-functions
integration fourier-analysis periodic-functions
asked Nov 19 at 18:05
Andreas P
153
153
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
Let $u=-x$, then:
$$int_{-a}^{a} f(x) mathrm{d}x=int_{a}^{-a} f(-u)mathrm{d}(-u)=-int_a^{-a}f(-u)mathrm{d}u$$
Can you continue?
Every function can be decomposed into the sum of an odd and an even function:
$$f(x)=f_o(x)+f_e(x)$$
Where
$$f_e(x)=frac{f(x)+f(-x)}{2}$$
and
$$f_o(x)=frac{f(x)-f(-x)}{2}$$
So
$$int_{-a}^a f(x)mathrm{d}x = int_{-a}^af_o(x)mathrm{d}x+int_{-a}^af_e(x)mathrm{d}x$$
$$int_{-a}^a f(-x)mathrm{d}x = int_{-a}^af_o(-x)mathrm{d}x+int_{-a}^af_e(-x)mathrm{d}x$$
The integral of an odd function on a symmetric interval is $0$, so we are left with
$$int_{-a}^a f(x)mathrm{d}x = int_{-a}^af_e(x)mathrm{d}x$$
$$int_{-a}^a f(-x)mathrm{d}x = int_{-a}^af_e(-x)mathrm{d}x$$
But $f_e$ is even, so $f_e(x)=f_e(-x)$:
$$int_{-a}^a f(-x)mathrm{d}x = int_{-a}^af_e(-x)mathrm{d}x=int_{-a}^af_e(x)mathrm{d}x=int_{-a}^a f(x)mathrm{d}x$$
$=-(-int_{-a}^af(-u)du=int_{-a}^af(-u)du$ Which is just a change of variable from calling it x...?
– Andreas P
Nov 19 at 18:42
@AndreasP yes! I've just came up with another solution. Do you want me to add it to the answer?
– Botond
Nov 19 at 18:45
Great! You are very much welcome to add all the solutions you come up with :-)
– Andreas P
Nov 19 at 18:49
@AndreasP I've added it. Note that the proof of the "$int_{-a}^{a}f_o=0$ is really similar to the first proof, but I think it's easier to see that it's true (or at least for me). Also, this odd-even decomposition can be useful sometimes.
– Botond
Nov 19 at 19:00
That is a great proof. And it only gets better since we have proved every aspect you use in our course! Thank you very much for your help
– Andreas P
Nov 19 at 19:02
|
show 1 more comment
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
Let $u=-x$, then:
$$int_{-a}^{a} f(x) mathrm{d}x=int_{a}^{-a} f(-u)mathrm{d}(-u)=-int_a^{-a}f(-u)mathrm{d}u$$
Can you continue?
Every function can be decomposed into the sum of an odd and an even function:
$$f(x)=f_o(x)+f_e(x)$$
Where
$$f_e(x)=frac{f(x)+f(-x)}{2}$$
and
$$f_o(x)=frac{f(x)-f(-x)}{2}$$
So
$$int_{-a}^a f(x)mathrm{d}x = int_{-a}^af_o(x)mathrm{d}x+int_{-a}^af_e(x)mathrm{d}x$$
$$int_{-a}^a f(-x)mathrm{d}x = int_{-a}^af_o(-x)mathrm{d}x+int_{-a}^af_e(-x)mathrm{d}x$$
The integral of an odd function on a symmetric interval is $0$, so we are left with
$$int_{-a}^a f(x)mathrm{d}x = int_{-a}^af_e(x)mathrm{d}x$$
$$int_{-a}^a f(-x)mathrm{d}x = int_{-a}^af_e(-x)mathrm{d}x$$
But $f_e$ is even, so $f_e(x)=f_e(-x)$:
$$int_{-a}^a f(-x)mathrm{d}x = int_{-a}^af_e(-x)mathrm{d}x=int_{-a}^af_e(x)mathrm{d}x=int_{-a}^a f(x)mathrm{d}x$$
$=-(-int_{-a}^af(-u)du=int_{-a}^af(-u)du$ Which is just a change of variable from calling it x...?
– Andreas P
Nov 19 at 18:42
@AndreasP yes! I've just came up with another solution. Do you want me to add it to the answer?
– Botond
Nov 19 at 18:45
Great! You are very much welcome to add all the solutions you come up with :-)
– Andreas P
Nov 19 at 18:49
@AndreasP I've added it. Note that the proof of the "$int_{-a}^{a}f_o=0$ is really similar to the first proof, but I think it's easier to see that it's true (or at least for me). Also, this odd-even decomposition can be useful sometimes.
– Botond
Nov 19 at 19:00
That is a great proof. And it only gets better since we have proved every aspect you use in our course! Thank you very much for your help
– Andreas P
Nov 19 at 19:02
|
show 1 more comment
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
Let $u=-x$, then:
$$int_{-a}^{a} f(x) mathrm{d}x=int_{a}^{-a} f(-u)mathrm{d}(-u)=-int_a^{-a}f(-u)mathrm{d}u$$
Can you continue?
Every function can be decomposed into the sum of an odd and an even function:
$$f(x)=f_o(x)+f_e(x)$$
Where
$$f_e(x)=frac{f(x)+f(-x)}{2}$$
and
$$f_o(x)=frac{f(x)-f(-x)}{2}$$
So
$$int_{-a}^a f(x)mathrm{d}x = int_{-a}^af_o(x)mathrm{d}x+int_{-a}^af_e(x)mathrm{d}x$$
$$int_{-a}^a f(-x)mathrm{d}x = int_{-a}^af_o(-x)mathrm{d}x+int_{-a}^af_e(-x)mathrm{d}x$$
The integral of an odd function on a symmetric interval is $0$, so we are left with
$$int_{-a}^a f(x)mathrm{d}x = int_{-a}^af_e(x)mathrm{d}x$$
$$int_{-a}^a f(-x)mathrm{d}x = int_{-a}^af_e(-x)mathrm{d}x$$
But $f_e$ is even, so $f_e(x)=f_e(-x)$:
$$int_{-a}^a f(-x)mathrm{d}x = int_{-a}^af_e(-x)mathrm{d}x=int_{-a}^af_e(x)mathrm{d}x=int_{-a}^a f(x)mathrm{d}x$$
$=-(-int_{-a}^af(-u)du=int_{-a}^af(-u)du$ Which is just a change of variable from calling it x...?
– Andreas P
Nov 19 at 18:42
@AndreasP yes! I've just came up with another solution. Do you want me to add it to the answer?
– Botond
Nov 19 at 18:45
Great! You are very much welcome to add all the solutions you come up with :-)
– Andreas P
Nov 19 at 18:49
@AndreasP I've added it. Note that the proof of the "$int_{-a}^{a}f_o=0$ is really similar to the first proof, but I think it's easier to see that it's true (or at least for me). Also, this odd-even decomposition can be useful sometimes.
– Botond
Nov 19 at 19:00
That is a great proof. And it only gets better since we have proved every aspect you use in our course! Thank you very much for your help
– Andreas P
Nov 19 at 19:02
|
show 1 more comment
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
Let $u=-x$, then:
$$int_{-a}^{a} f(x) mathrm{d}x=int_{a}^{-a} f(-u)mathrm{d}(-u)=-int_a^{-a}f(-u)mathrm{d}u$$
Can you continue?
Every function can be decomposed into the sum of an odd and an even function:
$$f(x)=f_o(x)+f_e(x)$$
Where
$$f_e(x)=frac{f(x)+f(-x)}{2}$$
and
$$f_o(x)=frac{f(x)-f(-x)}{2}$$
So
$$int_{-a}^a f(x)mathrm{d}x = int_{-a}^af_o(x)mathrm{d}x+int_{-a}^af_e(x)mathrm{d}x$$
$$int_{-a}^a f(-x)mathrm{d}x = int_{-a}^af_o(-x)mathrm{d}x+int_{-a}^af_e(-x)mathrm{d}x$$
The integral of an odd function on a symmetric interval is $0$, so we are left with
$$int_{-a}^a f(x)mathrm{d}x = int_{-a}^af_e(x)mathrm{d}x$$
$$int_{-a}^a f(-x)mathrm{d}x = int_{-a}^af_e(-x)mathrm{d}x$$
But $f_e$ is even, so $f_e(x)=f_e(-x)$:
$$int_{-a}^a f(-x)mathrm{d}x = int_{-a}^af_e(-x)mathrm{d}x=int_{-a}^af_e(x)mathrm{d}x=int_{-a}^a f(x)mathrm{d}x$$
Let $u=-x$, then:
$$int_{-a}^{a} f(x) mathrm{d}x=int_{a}^{-a} f(-u)mathrm{d}(-u)=-int_a^{-a}f(-u)mathrm{d}u$$
Can you continue?
Every function can be decomposed into the sum of an odd and an even function:
$$f(x)=f_o(x)+f_e(x)$$
Where
$$f_e(x)=frac{f(x)+f(-x)}{2}$$
and
$$f_o(x)=frac{f(x)-f(-x)}{2}$$
So
$$int_{-a}^a f(x)mathrm{d}x = int_{-a}^af_o(x)mathrm{d}x+int_{-a}^af_e(x)mathrm{d}x$$
$$int_{-a}^a f(-x)mathrm{d}x = int_{-a}^af_o(-x)mathrm{d}x+int_{-a}^af_e(-x)mathrm{d}x$$
The integral of an odd function on a symmetric interval is $0$, so we are left with
$$int_{-a}^a f(x)mathrm{d}x = int_{-a}^af_e(x)mathrm{d}x$$
$$int_{-a}^a f(-x)mathrm{d}x = int_{-a}^af_e(-x)mathrm{d}x$$
But $f_e$ is even, so $f_e(x)=f_e(-x)$:
$$int_{-a}^a f(-x)mathrm{d}x = int_{-a}^af_e(-x)mathrm{d}x=int_{-a}^af_e(x)mathrm{d}x=int_{-a}^a f(x)mathrm{d}x$$
edited Nov 19 at 18:58
answered Nov 19 at 18:13
Botond
5,1912732
5,1912732
$=-(-int_{-a}^af(-u)du=int_{-a}^af(-u)du$ Which is just a change of variable from calling it x...?
– Andreas P
Nov 19 at 18:42
@AndreasP yes! I've just came up with another solution. Do you want me to add it to the answer?
– Botond
Nov 19 at 18:45
Great! You are very much welcome to add all the solutions you come up with :-)
– Andreas P
Nov 19 at 18:49
@AndreasP I've added it. Note that the proof of the "$int_{-a}^{a}f_o=0$ is really similar to the first proof, but I think it's easier to see that it's true (or at least for me). Also, this odd-even decomposition can be useful sometimes.
– Botond
Nov 19 at 19:00
That is a great proof. And it only gets better since we have proved every aspect you use in our course! Thank you very much for your help
– Andreas P
Nov 19 at 19:02
|
show 1 more comment
$=-(-int_{-a}^af(-u)du=int_{-a}^af(-u)du$ Which is just a change of variable from calling it x...?
– Andreas P
Nov 19 at 18:42
@AndreasP yes! I've just came up with another solution. Do you want me to add it to the answer?
– Botond
Nov 19 at 18:45
Great! You are very much welcome to add all the solutions you come up with :-)
– Andreas P
Nov 19 at 18:49
@AndreasP I've added it. Note that the proof of the "$int_{-a}^{a}f_o=0$ is really similar to the first proof, but I think it's easier to see that it's true (or at least for me). Also, this odd-even decomposition can be useful sometimes.
– Botond
Nov 19 at 19:00
That is a great proof. And it only gets better since we have proved every aspect you use in our course! Thank you very much for your help
– Andreas P
Nov 19 at 19:02
$=-(-int_{-a}^af(-u)du=int_{-a}^af(-u)du$ Which is just a change of variable from calling it x...?
– Andreas P
Nov 19 at 18:42
$=-(-int_{-a}^af(-u)du=int_{-a}^af(-u)du$ Which is just a change of variable from calling it x...?
– Andreas P
Nov 19 at 18:42
@AndreasP yes! I've just came up with another solution. Do you want me to add it to the answer?
– Botond
Nov 19 at 18:45
@AndreasP yes! I've just came up with another solution. Do you want me to add it to the answer?
– Botond
Nov 19 at 18:45
Great! You are very much welcome to add all the solutions you come up with :-)
– Andreas P
Nov 19 at 18:49
Great! You are very much welcome to add all the solutions you come up with :-)
– Andreas P
Nov 19 at 18:49
@AndreasP I've added it. Note that the proof of the "$int_{-a}^{a}f_o=0$ is really similar to the first proof, but I think it's easier to see that it's true (or at least for me). Also, this odd-even decomposition can be useful sometimes.
– Botond
Nov 19 at 19:00
@AndreasP I've added it. Note that the proof of the "$int_{-a}^{a}f_o=0$ is really similar to the first proof, but I think it's easier to see that it's true (or at least for me). Also, this odd-even decomposition can be useful sometimes.
– Botond
Nov 19 at 19:00
That is a great proof. And it only gets better since we have proved every aspect you use in our course! Thank you very much for your help
– Andreas P
Nov 19 at 19:02
That is a great proof. And it only gets better since we have proved every aspect you use in our course! Thank you very much for your help
– Andreas P
Nov 19 at 19:02
|
show 1 more comment
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3005278%2fintegral-f-x-from-a-to-a-equal-to-integral-fx-from-a-to-a%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown