What is the partition of the Set S induced by R in this example?
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
A company makes charm bracelets with 4 charms: A, B, C, and D. There are 24 different orders they can enter the machine:
ABCD ABDC ACBD ACDB ADBC ADCB
BCAD BCDA BDAC BDCA CABD CADB
CDAB CDBA DABC DACB DBAC DBCA
BACD BADC CBAD CBDA DCAB DCBA
Once the charms are threaded on a bracelet many of the arrangements look the same. If the relation R on the set S of line arrangements with the rule (X,Y) ∈ R if arrangements X and Y look the same when threaded on a bracelet, what is the partition of the set S induced by R?
Would this be right?
The partition of the set S induced by R is
{{ABCD, BCDA, CDAB, DABC}, {ABCD, BDCA, DCAB, CABD}, {ACBD, CDBA, DBAC, BACD},{ADBC, DBCA, BCAD, CADB}, {ADCB, DCBA, CBAD, BADC}}
discrete-mathematics
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
A company makes charm bracelets with 4 charms: A, B, C, and D. There are 24 different orders they can enter the machine:
ABCD ABDC ACBD ACDB ADBC ADCB
BCAD BCDA BDAC BDCA CABD CADB
CDAB CDBA DABC DACB DBAC DBCA
BACD BADC CBAD CBDA DCAB DCBA
Once the charms are threaded on a bracelet many of the arrangements look the same. If the relation R on the set S of line arrangements with the rule (X,Y) ∈ R if arrangements X and Y look the same when threaded on a bracelet, what is the partition of the set S induced by R?
Would this be right?
The partition of the set S induced by R is
{{ABCD, BCDA, CDAB, DABC}, {ABCD, BDCA, DCAB, CABD}, {ACBD, CDBA, DBAC, BACD},{ADBC, DBCA, BCAD, CADB}, {ADCB, DCBA, CBAD, BADC}}
discrete-mathematics
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
A company makes charm bracelets with 4 charms: A, B, C, and D. There are 24 different orders they can enter the machine:
ABCD ABDC ACBD ACDB ADBC ADCB
BCAD BCDA BDAC BDCA CABD CADB
CDAB CDBA DABC DACB DBAC DBCA
BACD BADC CBAD CBDA DCAB DCBA
Once the charms are threaded on a bracelet many of the arrangements look the same. If the relation R on the set S of line arrangements with the rule (X,Y) ∈ R if arrangements X and Y look the same when threaded on a bracelet, what is the partition of the set S induced by R?
Would this be right?
The partition of the set S induced by R is
{{ABCD, BCDA, CDAB, DABC}, {ABCD, BDCA, DCAB, CABD}, {ACBD, CDBA, DBAC, BACD},{ADBC, DBCA, BCAD, CADB}, {ADCB, DCBA, CBAD, BADC}}
discrete-mathematics
A company makes charm bracelets with 4 charms: A, B, C, and D. There are 24 different orders they can enter the machine:
ABCD ABDC ACBD ACDB ADBC ADCB
BCAD BCDA BDAC BDCA CABD CADB
CDAB CDBA DABC DACB DBAC DBCA
BACD BADC CBAD CBDA DCAB DCBA
Once the charms are threaded on a bracelet many of the arrangements look the same. If the relation R on the set S of line arrangements with the rule (X,Y) ∈ R if arrangements X and Y look the same when threaded on a bracelet, what is the partition of the set S induced by R?
Would this be right?
The partition of the set S induced by R is
{{ABCD, BCDA, CDAB, DABC}, {ABCD, BDCA, DCAB, CABD}, {ACBD, CDBA, DBAC, BACD},{ADBC, DBCA, BCAD, CADB}, {ADCB, DCBA, CBAD, BADC}}
discrete-mathematics
discrete-mathematics
asked Nov 19 at 18:16
happysaint
62
62
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
Almost. Note that you can flip around a bracelet.
... or would a bracelet and its flipped counterpart not 'look the same'? Then again, if I rotate a bracelet, one could argue that that does not look the same either ... Hmmm ... maybe you shpould look for some clarification on what 'look the same' exactly means ...
(BTW: you're missing $4$ orders... Also, first entry of second set should be ABDC, and first entry of third set ACDB...)
"look the same" means the same is an equivalence relation and the charms of one are in the reverse order of the charms of the other, wouldn't there only be 5 subsets with 20 members?
– happysaint
Nov 19 at 18:51
@happysaint OK, so then you should get 3 groups of 8 ... (e.g. your first group of 4 is the flipped versions of the last group of 4)
– Bram28
Nov 19 at 18:55
Could it be 6 groups of 4? So: {{ABCD, DABC, CDAB, BCDA}, {ABDC, CABD, DCAB, BDCA}, for 2 groups and {ACBD, DACB, BDAC, CBDA}, {ACDB, BACD, DBAC, CDBA}, {ADBC, CADB, BCAD, DBCA}, {ADCB, BADC, CBAD, DCBA}}
– happysaint
Nov 19 at 19:50
If flipping a bracelet around means it still 'looks the same', then ABCD is the same as BCDA,CDAB, DABC, DCBA, CBAD, BADC, and ADCB. So, three group of 8. if flipping around means it no longer looks the same, you get 6 groups of 4.
– Bram28
Nov 19 at 20:24
I guessed what "look the same means" in my comment above and am confused now what it actually means. Wouldn't shifting letters to the next place, as with 6 groups of 4 'look the same'? For example from the first group of 4, ABCD is related to DABC, DABC is related to CDAB and CDAB is related to BCDA, they are reflexive, symmetric, and transitive as an equivalence relation and would all 'look similar' since it's shifting letters to the next place to get similar looking arrangements?
– happysaint
Nov 19 at 20:32
|
show 1 more comment
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
Almost. Note that you can flip around a bracelet.
... or would a bracelet and its flipped counterpart not 'look the same'? Then again, if I rotate a bracelet, one could argue that that does not look the same either ... Hmmm ... maybe you shpould look for some clarification on what 'look the same' exactly means ...
(BTW: you're missing $4$ orders... Also, first entry of second set should be ABDC, and first entry of third set ACDB...)
"look the same" means the same is an equivalence relation and the charms of one are in the reverse order of the charms of the other, wouldn't there only be 5 subsets with 20 members?
– happysaint
Nov 19 at 18:51
@happysaint OK, so then you should get 3 groups of 8 ... (e.g. your first group of 4 is the flipped versions of the last group of 4)
– Bram28
Nov 19 at 18:55
Could it be 6 groups of 4? So: {{ABCD, DABC, CDAB, BCDA}, {ABDC, CABD, DCAB, BDCA}, for 2 groups and {ACBD, DACB, BDAC, CBDA}, {ACDB, BACD, DBAC, CDBA}, {ADBC, CADB, BCAD, DBCA}, {ADCB, BADC, CBAD, DCBA}}
– happysaint
Nov 19 at 19:50
If flipping a bracelet around means it still 'looks the same', then ABCD is the same as BCDA,CDAB, DABC, DCBA, CBAD, BADC, and ADCB. So, three group of 8. if flipping around means it no longer looks the same, you get 6 groups of 4.
– Bram28
Nov 19 at 20:24
I guessed what "look the same means" in my comment above and am confused now what it actually means. Wouldn't shifting letters to the next place, as with 6 groups of 4 'look the same'? For example from the first group of 4, ABCD is related to DABC, DABC is related to CDAB and CDAB is related to BCDA, they are reflexive, symmetric, and transitive as an equivalence relation and would all 'look similar' since it's shifting letters to the next place to get similar looking arrangements?
– happysaint
Nov 19 at 20:32
|
show 1 more comment
up vote
0
down vote
Almost. Note that you can flip around a bracelet.
... or would a bracelet and its flipped counterpart not 'look the same'? Then again, if I rotate a bracelet, one could argue that that does not look the same either ... Hmmm ... maybe you shpould look for some clarification on what 'look the same' exactly means ...
(BTW: you're missing $4$ orders... Also, first entry of second set should be ABDC, and first entry of third set ACDB...)
"look the same" means the same is an equivalence relation and the charms of one are in the reverse order of the charms of the other, wouldn't there only be 5 subsets with 20 members?
– happysaint
Nov 19 at 18:51
@happysaint OK, so then you should get 3 groups of 8 ... (e.g. your first group of 4 is the flipped versions of the last group of 4)
– Bram28
Nov 19 at 18:55
Could it be 6 groups of 4? So: {{ABCD, DABC, CDAB, BCDA}, {ABDC, CABD, DCAB, BDCA}, for 2 groups and {ACBD, DACB, BDAC, CBDA}, {ACDB, BACD, DBAC, CDBA}, {ADBC, CADB, BCAD, DBCA}, {ADCB, BADC, CBAD, DCBA}}
– happysaint
Nov 19 at 19:50
If flipping a bracelet around means it still 'looks the same', then ABCD is the same as BCDA,CDAB, DABC, DCBA, CBAD, BADC, and ADCB. So, three group of 8. if flipping around means it no longer looks the same, you get 6 groups of 4.
– Bram28
Nov 19 at 20:24
I guessed what "look the same means" in my comment above and am confused now what it actually means. Wouldn't shifting letters to the next place, as with 6 groups of 4 'look the same'? For example from the first group of 4, ABCD is related to DABC, DABC is related to CDAB and CDAB is related to BCDA, they are reflexive, symmetric, and transitive as an equivalence relation and would all 'look similar' since it's shifting letters to the next place to get similar looking arrangements?
– happysaint
Nov 19 at 20:32
|
show 1 more comment
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
Almost. Note that you can flip around a bracelet.
... or would a bracelet and its flipped counterpart not 'look the same'? Then again, if I rotate a bracelet, one could argue that that does not look the same either ... Hmmm ... maybe you shpould look for some clarification on what 'look the same' exactly means ...
(BTW: you're missing $4$ orders... Also, first entry of second set should be ABDC, and first entry of third set ACDB...)
Almost. Note that you can flip around a bracelet.
... or would a bracelet and its flipped counterpart not 'look the same'? Then again, if I rotate a bracelet, one could argue that that does not look the same either ... Hmmm ... maybe you shpould look for some clarification on what 'look the same' exactly means ...
(BTW: you're missing $4$ orders... Also, first entry of second set should be ABDC, and first entry of third set ACDB...)
edited Nov 19 at 18:33
answered Nov 19 at 18:26
Bram28
58.7k44185
58.7k44185
"look the same" means the same is an equivalence relation and the charms of one are in the reverse order of the charms of the other, wouldn't there only be 5 subsets with 20 members?
– happysaint
Nov 19 at 18:51
@happysaint OK, so then you should get 3 groups of 8 ... (e.g. your first group of 4 is the flipped versions of the last group of 4)
– Bram28
Nov 19 at 18:55
Could it be 6 groups of 4? So: {{ABCD, DABC, CDAB, BCDA}, {ABDC, CABD, DCAB, BDCA}, for 2 groups and {ACBD, DACB, BDAC, CBDA}, {ACDB, BACD, DBAC, CDBA}, {ADBC, CADB, BCAD, DBCA}, {ADCB, BADC, CBAD, DCBA}}
– happysaint
Nov 19 at 19:50
If flipping a bracelet around means it still 'looks the same', then ABCD is the same as BCDA,CDAB, DABC, DCBA, CBAD, BADC, and ADCB. So, three group of 8. if flipping around means it no longer looks the same, you get 6 groups of 4.
– Bram28
Nov 19 at 20:24
I guessed what "look the same means" in my comment above and am confused now what it actually means. Wouldn't shifting letters to the next place, as with 6 groups of 4 'look the same'? For example from the first group of 4, ABCD is related to DABC, DABC is related to CDAB and CDAB is related to BCDA, they are reflexive, symmetric, and transitive as an equivalence relation and would all 'look similar' since it's shifting letters to the next place to get similar looking arrangements?
– happysaint
Nov 19 at 20:32
|
show 1 more comment
"look the same" means the same is an equivalence relation and the charms of one are in the reverse order of the charms of the other, wouldn't there only be 5 subsets with 20 members?
– happysaint
Nov 19 at 18:51
@happysaint OK, so then you should get 3 groups of 8 ... (e.g. your first group of 4 is the flipped versions of the last group of 4)
– Bram28
Nov 19 at 18:55
Could it be 6 groups of 4? So: {{ABCD, DABC, CDAB, BCDA}, {ABDC, CABD, DCAB, BDCA}, for 2 groups and {ACBD, DACB, BDAC, CBDA}, {ACDB, BACD, DBAC, CDBA}, {ADBC, CADB, BCAD, DBCA}, {ADCB, BADC, CBAD, DCBA}}
– happysaint
Nov 19 at 19:50
If flipping a bracelet around means it still 'looks the same', then ABCD is the same as BCDA,CDAB, DABC, DCBA, CBAD, BADC, and ADCB. So, three group of 8. if flipping around means it no longer looks the same, you get 6 groups of 4.
– Bram28
Nov 19 at 20:24
I guessed what "look the same means" in my comment above and am confused now what it actually means. Wouldn't shifting letters to the next place, as with 6 groups of 4 'look the same'? For example from the first group of 4, ABCD is related to DABC, DABC is related to CDAB and CDAB is related to BCDA, they are reflexive, symmetric, and transitive as an equivalence relation and would all 'look similar' since it's shifting letters to the next place to get similar looking arrangements?
– happysaint
Nov 19 at 20:32
"look the same" means the same is an equivalence relation and the charms of one are in the reverse order of the charms of the other, wouldn't there only be 5 subsets with 20 members?
– happysaint
Nov 19 at 18:51
"look the same" means the same is an equivalence relation and the charms of one are in the reverse order of the charms of the other, wouldn't there only be 5 subsets with 20 members?
– happysaint
Nov 19 at 18:51
@happysaint OK, so then you should get 3 groups of 8 ... (e.g. your first group of 4 is the flipped versions of the last group of 4)
– Bram28
Nov 19 at 18:55
@happysaint OK, so then you should get 3 groups of 8 ... (e.g. your first group of 4 is the flipped versions of the last group of 4)
– Bram28
Nov 19 at 18:55
Could it be 6 groups of 4? So: {{ABCD, DABC, CDAB, BCDA}, {ABDC, CABD, DCAB, BDCA}, for 2 groups and {ACBD, DACB, BDAC, CBDA}, {ACDB, BACD, DBAC, CDBA}, {ADBC, CADB, BCAD, DBCA}, {ADCB, BADC, CBAD, DCBA}}
– happysaint
Nov 19 at 19:50
Could it be 6 groups of 4? So: {{ABCD, DABC, CDAB, BCDA}, {ABDC, CABD, DCAB, BDCA}, for 2 groups and {ACBD, DACB, BDAC, CBDA}, {ACDB, BACD, DBAC, CDBA}, {ADBC, CADB, BCAD, DBCA}, {ADCB, BADC, CBAD, DCBA}}
– happysaint
Nov 19 at 19:50
If flipping a bracelet around means it still 'looks the same', then ABCD is the same as BCDA,CDAB, DABC, DCBA, CBAD, BADC, and ADCB. So, three group of 8. if flipping around means it no longer looks the same, you get 6 groups of 4.
– Bram28
Nov 19 at 20:24
If flipping a bracelet around means it still 'looks the same', then ABCD is the same as BCDA,CDAB, DABC, DCBA, CBAD, BADC, and ADCB. So, three group of 8. if flipping around means it no longer looks the same, you get 6 groups of 4.
– Bram28
Nov 19 at 20:24
I guessed what "look the same means" in my comment above and am confused now what it actually means. Wouldn't shifting letters to the next place, as with 6 groups of 4 'look the same'? For example from the first group of 4, ABCD is related to DABC, DABC is related to CDAB and CDAB is related to BCDA, they are reflexive, symmetric, and transitive as an equivalence relation and would all 'look similar' since it's shifting letters to the next place to get similar looking arrangements?
– happysaint
Nov 19 at 20:32
I guessed what "look the same means" in my comment above and am confused now what it actually means. Wouldn't shifting letters to the next place, as with 6 groups of 4 'look the same'? For example from the first group of 4, ABCD is related to DABC, DABC is related to CDAB and CDAB is related to BCDA, they are reflexive, symmetric, and transitive as an equivalence relation and would all 'look similar' since it's shifting letters to the next place to get similar looking arrangements?
– happysaint
Nov 19 at 20:32
|
show 1 more comment
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3005300%2fwhat-is-the-partition-of-the-set-s-induced-by-r-in-this-example%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown