What is the partition of the Set S induced by R in this example?











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












A company makes charm bracelets with 4 charms: A, B, C, and D. There are 24 different orders they can enter the machine:



ABCD ABDC ACBD ACDB ADBC ADCB



BCAD BCDA BDAC BDCA CABD CADB



CDAB CDBA DABC DACB DBAC DBCA



BACD BADC CBAD CBDA DCAB DCBA



Once the charms are threaded on a bracelet many of the arrangements look the same. If the relation R on the set S of line arrangements with the rule (X,Y) ∈ R if arrangements X and Y look the same when threaded on a bracelet, what is the partition of the set S induced by R?



Would this be right?



The partition of the set S induced by R is
{{ABCD, BCDA, CDAB, DABC}, {ABCD, BDCA, DCAB, CABD}, {ACBD, CDBA, DBAC, BACD},{ADBC, DBCA, BCAD, CADB}, {ADCB, DCBA, CBAD, BADC}}










share|cite|improve this question


























    up vote
    0
    down vote

    favorite












    A company makes charm bracelets with 4 charms: A, B, C, and D. There are 24 different orders they can enter the machine:



    ABCD ABDC ACBD ACDB ADBC ADCB



    BCAD BCDA BDAC BDCA CABD CADB



    CDAB CDBA DABC DACB DBAC DBCA



    BACD BADC CBAD CBDA DCAB DCBA



    Once the charms are threaded on a bracelet many of the arrangements look the same. If the relation R on the set S of line arrangements with the rule (X,Y) ∈ R if arrangements X and Y look the same when threaded on a bracelet, what is the partition of the set S induced by R?



    Would this be right?



    The partition of the set S induced by R is
    {{ABCD, BCDA, CDAB, DABC}, {ABCD, BDCA, DCAB, CABD}, {ACBD, CDBA, DBAC, BACD},{ADBC, DBCA, BCAD, CADB}, {ADCB, DCBA, CBAD, BADC}}










    share|cite|improve this question
























      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite











      A company makes charm bracelets with 4 charms: A, B, C, and D. There are 24 different orders they can enter the machine:



      ABCD ABDC ACBD ACDB ADBC ADCB



      BCAD BCDA BDAC BDCA CABD CADB



      CDAB CDBA DABC DACB DBAC DBCA



      BACD BADC CBAD CBDA DCAB DCBA



      Once the charms are threaded on a bracelet many of the arrangements look the same. If the relation R on the set S of line arrangements with the rule (X,Y) ∈ R if arrangements X and Y look the same when threaded on a bracelet, what is the partition of the set S induced by R?



      Would this be right?



      The partition of the set S induced by R is
      {{ABCD, BCDA, CDAB, DABC}, {ABCD, BDCA, DCAB, CABD}, {ACBD, CDBA, DBAC, BACD},{ADBC, DBCA, BCAD, CADB}, {ADCB, DCBA, CBAD, BADC}}










      share|cite|improve this question













      A company makes charm bracelets with 4 charms: A, B, C, and D. There are 24 different orders they can enter the machine:



      ABCD ABDC ACBD ACDB ADBC ADCB



      BCAD BCDA BDAC BDCA CABD CADB



      CDAB CDBA DABC DACB DBAC DBCA



      BACD BADC CBAD CBDA DCAB DCBA



      Once the charms are threaded on a bracelet many of the arrangements look the same. If the relation R on the set S of line arrangements with the rule (X,Y) ∈ R if arrangements X and Y look the same when threaded on a bracelet, what is the partition of the set S induced by R?



      Would this be right?



      The partition of the set S induced by R is
      {{ABCD, BCDA, CDAB, DABC}, {ABCD, BDCA, DCAB, CABD}, {ACBD, CDBA, DBAC, BACD},{ADBC, DBCA, BCAD, CADB}, {ADCB, DCBA, CBAD, BADC}}







      discrete-mathematics






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Nov 19 at 18:16









      happysaint

      62




      62






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          0
          down vote













          Almost. Note that you can flip around a bracelet.



          ... or would a bracelet and its flipped counterpart not 'look the same'? Then again, if I rotate a bracelet, one could argue that that does not look the same either ... Hmmm ... maybe you shpould look for some clarification on what 'look the same' exactly means ...



          (BTW: you're missing $4$ orders... Also, first entry of second set should be ABDC, and first entry of third set ACDB...)






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • "look the same" means the same is an equivalence relation and the charms of one are in the reverse order of the charms of the other, wouldn't there only be 5 subsets with 20 members?
            – happysaint
            Nov 19 at 18:51










          • @happysaint OK, so then you should get 3 groups of 8 ... (e.g. your first group of 4 is the flipped versions of the last group of 4)
            – Bram28
            Nov 19 at 18:55










          • Could it be 6 groups of 4? So: {{ABCD, DABC, CDAB, BCDA}, {ABDC, CABD, DCAB, BDCA}, for 2 groups and {ACBD, DACB, BDAC, CBDA}, {ACDB, BACD, DBAC, CDBA}, {ADBC, CADB, BCAD, DBCA}, {ADCB, BADC, CBAD, DCBA}}
            – happysaint
            Nov 19 at 19:50












          • If flipping a bracelet around means it still 'looks the same', then ABCD is the same as BCDA,CDAB, DABC, DCBA, CBAD, BADC, and ADCB. So, three group of 8. if flipping around means it no longer looks the same, you get 6 groups of 4.
            – Bram28
            Nov 19 at 20:24










          • I guessed what "look the same means" in my comment above and am confused now what it actually means. Wouldn't shifting letters to the next place, as with 6 groups of 4 'look the same'? For example from the first group of 4, ABCD is related to DABC, DABC is related to CDAB and CDAB is related to BCDA, they are reflexive, symmetric, and transitive as an equivalence relation and would all 'look similar' since it's shifting letters to the next place to get similar looking arrangements?
            – happysaint
            Nov 19 at 20:32













          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3005300%2fwhat-is-the-partition-of-the-set-s-induced-by-r-in-this-example%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          0
          down vote













          Almost. Note that you can flip around a bracelet.



          ... or would a bracelet and its flipped counterpart not 'look the same'? Then again, if I rotate a bracelet, one could argue that that does not look the same either ... Hmmm ... maybe you shpould look for some clarification on what 'look the same' exactly means ...



          (BTW: you're missing $4$ orders... Also, first entry of second set should be ABDC, and first entry of third set ACDB...)






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • "look the same" means the same is an equivalence relation and the charms of one are in the reverse order of the charms of the other, wouldn't there only be 5 subsets with 20 members?
            – happysaint
            Nov 19 at 18:51










          • @happysaint OK, so then you should get 3 groups of 8 ... (e.g. your first group of 4 is the flipped versions of the last group of 4)
            – Bram28
            Nov 19 at 18:55










          • Could it be 6 groups of 4? So: {{ABCD, DABC, CDAB, BCDA}, {ABDC, CABD, DCAB, BDCA}, for 2 groups and {ACBD, DACB, BDAC, CBDA}, {ACDB, BACD, DBAC, CDBA}, {ADBC, CADB, BCAD, DBCA}, {ADCB, BADC, CBAD, DCBA}}
            – happysaint
            Nov 19 at 19:50












          • If flipping a bracelet around means it still 'looks the same', then ABCD is the same as BCDA,CDAB, DABC, DCBA, CBAD, BADC, and ADCB. So, three group of 8. if flipping around means it no longer looks the same, you get 6 groups of 4.
            – Bram28
            Nov 19 at 20:24










          • I guessed what "look the same means" in my comment above and am confused now what it actually means. Wouldn't shifting letters to the next place, as with 6 groups of 4 'look the same'? For example from the first group of 4, ABCD is related to DABC, DABC is related to CDAB and CDAB is related to BCDA, they are reflexive, symmetric, and transitive as an equivalence relation and would all 'look similar' since it's shifting letters to the next place to get similar looking arrangements?
            – happysaint
            Nov 19 at 20:32

















          up vote
          0
          down vote













          Almost. Note that you can flip around a bracelet.



          ... or would a bracelet and its flipped counterpart not 'look the same'? Then again, if I rotate a bracelet, one could argue that that does not look the same either ... Hmmm ... maybe you shpould look for some clarification on what 'look the same' exactly means ...



          (BTW: you're missing $4$ orders... Also, first entry of second set should be ABDC, and first entry of third set ACDB...)






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • "look the same" means the same is an equivalence relation and the charms of one are in the reverse order of the charms of the other, wouldn't there only be 5 subsets with 20 members?
            – happysaint
            Nov 19 at 18:51










          • @happysaint OK, so then you should get 3 groups of 8 ... (e.g. your first group of 4 is the flipped versions of the last group of 4)
            – Bram28
            Nov 19 at 18:55










          • Could it be 6 groups of 4? So: {{ABCD, DABC, CDAB, BCDA}, {ABDC, CABD, DCAB, BDCA}, for 2 groups and {ACBD, DACB, BDAC, CBDA}, {ACDB, BACD, DBAC, CDBA}, {ADBC, CADB, BCAD, DBCA}, {ADCB, BADC, CBAD, DCBA}}
            – happysaint
            Nov 19 at 19:50












          • If flipping a bracelet around means it still 'looks the same', then ABCD is the same as BCDA,CDAB, DABC, DCBA, CBAD, BADC, and ADCB. So, three group of 8. if flipping around means it no longer looks the same, you get 6 groups of 4.
            – Bram28
            Nov 19 at 20:24










          • I guessed what "look the same means" in my comment above and am confused now what it actually means. Wouldn't shifting letters to the next place, as with 6 groups of 4 'look the same'? For example from the first group of 4, ABCD is related to DABC, DABC is related to CDAB and CDAB is related to BCDA, they are reflexive, symmetric, and transitive as an equivalence relation and would all 'look similar' since it's shifting letters to the next place to get similar looking arrangements?
            – happysaint
            Nov 19 at 20:32















          up vote
          0
          down vote










          up vote
          0
          down vote









          Almost. Note that you can flip around a bracelet.



          ... or would a bracelet and its flipped counterpart not 'look the same'? Then again, if I rotate a bracelet, one could argue that that does not look the same either ... Hmmm ... maybe you shpould look for some clarification on what 'look the same' exactly means ...



          (BTW: you're missing $4$ orders... Also, first entry of second set should be ABDC, and first entry of third set ACDB...)






          share|cite|improve this answer














          Almost. Note that you can flip around a bracelet.



          ... or would a bracelet and its flipped counterpart not 'look the same'? Then again, if I rotate a bracelet, one could argue that that does not look the same either ... Hmmm ... maybe you shpould look for some clarification on what 'look the same' exactly means ...



          (BTW: you're missing $4$ orders... Also, first entry of second set should be ABDC, and first entry of third set ACDB...)







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Nov 19 at 18:33

























          answered Nov 19 at 18:26









          Bram28

          58.7k44185




          58.7k44185












          • "look the same" means the same is an equivalence relation and the charms of one are in the reverse order of the charms of the other, wouldn't there only be 5 subsets with 20 members?
            – happysaint
            Nov 19 at 18:51










          • @happysaint OK, so then you should get 3 groups of 8 ... (e.g. your first group of 4 is the flipped versions of the last group of 4)
            – Bram28
            Nov 19 at 18:55










          • Could it be 6 groups of 4? So: {{ABCD, DABC, CDAB, BCDA}, {ABDC, CABD, DCAB, BDCA}, for 2 groups and {ACBD, DACB, BDAC, CBDA}, {ACDB, BACD, DBAC, CDBA}, {ADBC, CADB, BCAD, DBCA}, {ADCB, BADC, CBAD, DCBA}}
            – happysaint
            Nov 19 at 19:50












          • If flipping a bracelet around means it still 'looks the same', then ABCD is the same as BCDA,CDAB, DABC, DCBA, CBAD, BADC, and ADCB. So, three group of 8. if flipping around means it no longer looks the same, you get 6 groups of 4.
            – Bram28
            Nov 19 at 20:24










          • I guessed what "look the same means" in my comment above and am confused now what it actually means. Wouldn't shifting letters to the next place, as with 6 groups of 4 'look the same'? For example from the first group of 4, ABCD is related to DABC, DABC is related to CDAB and CDAB is related to BCDA, they are reflexive, symmetric, and transitive as an equivalence relation and would all 'look similar' since it's shifting letters to the next place to get similar looking arrangements?
            – happysaint
            Nov 19 at 20:32




















          • "look the same" means the same is an equivalence relation and the charms of one are in the reverse order of the charms of the other, wouldn't there only be 5 subsets with 20 members?
            – happysaint
            Nov 19 at 18:51










          • @happysaint OK, so then you should get 3 groups of 8 ... (e.g. your first group of 4 is the flipped versions of the last group of 4)
            – Bram28
            Nov 19 at 18:55










          • Could it be 6 groups of 4? So: {{ABCD, DABC, CDAB, BCDA}, {ABDC, CABD, DCAB, BDCA}, for 2 groups and {ACBD, DACB, BDAC, CBDA}, {ACDB, BACD, DBAC, CDBA}, {ADBC, CADB, BCAD, DBCA}, {ADCB, BADC, CBAD, DCBA}}
            – happysaint
            Nov 19 at 19:50












          • If flipping a bracelet around means it still 'looks the same', then ABCD is the same as BCDA,CDAB, DABC, DCBA, CBAD, BADC, and ADCB. So, three group of 8. if flipping around means it no longer looks the same, you get 6 groups of 4.
            – Bram28
            Nov 19 at 20:24










          • I guessed what "look the same means" in my comment above and am confused now what it actually means. Wouldn't shifting letters to the next place, as with 6 groups of 4 'look the same'? For example from the first group of 4, ABCD is related to DABC, DABC is related to CDAB and CDAB is related to BCDA, they are reflexive, symmetric, and transitive as an equivalence relation and would all 'look similar' since it's shifting letters to the next place to get similar looking arrangements?
            – happysaint
            Nov 19 at 20:32


















          "look the same" means the same is an equivalence relation and the charms of one are in the reverse order of the charms of the other, wouldn't there only be 5 subsets with 20 members?
          – happysaint
          Nov 19 at 18:51




          "look the same" means the same is an equivalence relation and the charms of one are in the reverse order of the charms of the other, wouldn't there only be 5 subsets with 20 members?
          – happysaint
          Nov 19 at 18:51












          @happysaint OK, so then you should get 3 groups of 8 ... (e.g. your first group of 4 is the flipped versions of the last group of 4)
          – Bram28
          Nov 19 at 18:55




          @happysaint OK, so then you should get 3 groups of 8 ... (e.g. your first group of 4 is the flipped versions of the last group of 4)
          – Bram28
          Nov 19 at 18:55












          Could it be 6 groups of 4? So: {{ABCD, DABC, CDAB, BCDA}, {ABDC, CABD, DCAB, BDCA}, for 2 groups and {ACBD, DACB, BDAC, CBDA}, {ACDB, BACD, DBAC, CDBA}, {ADBC, CADB, BCAD, DBCA}, {ADCB, BADC, CBAD, DCBA}}
          – happysaint
          Nov 19 at 19:50






          Could it be 6 groups of 4? So: {{ABCD, DABC, CDAB, BCDA}, {ABDC, CABD, DCAB, BDCA}, for 2 groups and {ACBD, DACB, BDAC, CBDA}, {ACDB, BACD, DBAC, CDBA}, {ADBC, CADB, BCAD, DBCA}, {ADCB, BADC, CBAD, DCBA}}
          – happysaint
          Nov 19 at 19:50














          If flipping a bracelet around means it still 'looks the same', then ABCD is the same as BCDA,CDAB, DABC, DCBA, CBAD, BADC, and ADCB. So, three group of 8. if flipping around means it no longer looks the same, you get 6 groups of 4.
          – Bram28
          Nov 19 at 20:24




          If flipping a bracelet around means it still 'looks the same', then ABCD is the same as BCDA,CDAB, DABC, DCBA, CBAD, BADC, and ADCB. So, three group of 8. if flipping around means it no longer looks the same, you get 6 groups of 4.
          – Bram28
          Nov 19 at 20:24












          I guessed what "look the same means" in my comment above and am confused now what it actually means. Wouldn't shifting letters to the next place, as with 6 groups of 4 'look the same'? For example from the first group of 4, ABCD is related to DABC, DABC is related to CDAB and CDAB is related to BCDA, they are reflexive, symmetric, and transitive as an equivalence relation and would all 'look similar' since it's shifting letters to the next place to get similar looking arrangements?
          – happysaint
          Nov 19 at 20:32






          I guessed what "look the same means" in my comment above and am confused now what it actually means. Wouldn't shifting letters to the next place, as with 6 groups of 4 'look the same'? For example from the first group of 4, ABCD is related to DABC, DABC is related to CDAB and CDAB is related to BCDA, they are reflexive, symmetric, and transitive as an equivalence relation and would all 'look similar' since it's shifting letters to the next place to get similar looking arrangements?
          – happysaint
          Nov 19 at 20:32




















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3005300%2fwhat-is-the-partition-of-the-set-s-induced-by-r-in-this-example%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Ellipse (mathématiques)

          Quarter-circle Tiles

          Mont Emei