What exactly are bases vectors












0














I have watched 3 blue one brown Essence of Linear Algebra tutorials enter link description here. I want to ask one question. Let suppose we have a 3x4 transformation matrix as follows



A =



7    3    -9    8

6 2 -8 7

8 4 0 7


The basis of vector A are



{ (7,3,-9,8), (6, 2, -8, 7), (8, 4, 0, 7) }


And here is the vector which is to be transformed



B =



1    2     4    5


When we will multiply the matrix with vector it will take it from R4 --> R3.
as



17   13    51


Please tell me, when we write the multiplication in terms of linear combination it is like that.



1 [ 7    6    8 ]  + 2 [ 3    2     4] + 4 [ -9   8    0 ] + 5 [ 8   7    7]


But as the video of 3blue one brown suggested for R2 --> R2 transformation.



a( transformed vector i ) +  b (transormed vector j) for vector to be transformed [a, b]


But in the case defined above it is streching its coloumns which are not vectors.



Please tell me the solution of this, or any wrong concept I have.
Thanks










share|cite|improve this question






















  • When we talk about a basis, it is with respect to a vector space. $A$ is not a vector space here. Rather, the rows of $A$ form a basis for a subspace of $mathbb{R}^4.$
    – Sean Roberson
    Nov 26 at 15:21










  • Okay, yes we have 3 vectors from R4 which span R3. But my question is How exactly [ 1 2 4 5 ] are stretching the vectors of A to reach R3. In this case it is stretching in this way 1 [ 7 6 8 ] + 2 [ 3 2 4] + 4 [ -9 8 0 ] + 5 [ 8 7 7]. But [ 7 6 8] is not a vector
    – Muhammad Rafique
    Nov 26 at 15:29










  • No. They do not span $mathbb{R}^3.$
    – Sean Roberson
    Nov 26 at 16:26
















0














I have watched 3 blue one brown Essence of Linear Algebra tutorials enter link description here. I want to ask one question. Let suppose we have a 3x4 transformation matrix as follows



A =



7    3    -9    8

6 2 -8 7

8 4 0 7


The basis of vector A are



{ (7,3,-9,8), (6, 2, -8, 7), (8, 4, 0, 7) }


And here is the vector which is to be transformed



B =



1    2     4    5


When we will multiply the matrix with vector it will take it from R4 --> R3.
as



17   13    51


Please tell me, when we write the multiplication in terms of linear combination it is like that.



1 [ 7    6    8 ]  + 2 [ 3    2     4] + 4 [ -9   8    0 ] + 5 [ 8   7    7]


But as the video of 3blue one brown suggested for R2 --> R2 transformation.



a( transformed vector i ) +  b (transormed vector j) for vector to be transformed [a, b]


But in the case defined above it is streching its coloumns which are not vectors.



Please tell me the solution of this, or any wrong concept I have.
Thanks










share|cite|improve this question






















  • When we talk about a basis, it is with respect to a vector space. $A$ is not a vector space here. Rather, the rows of $A$ form a basis for a subspace of $mathbb{R}^4.$
    – Sean Roberson
    Nov 26 at 15:21










  • Okay, yes we have 3 vectors from R4 which span R3. But my question is How exactly [ 1 2 4 5 ] are stretching the vectors of A to reach R3. In this case it is stretching in this way 1 [ 7 6 8 ] + 2 [ 3 2 4] + 4 [ -9 8 0 ] + 5 [ 8 7 7]. But [ 7 6 8] is not a vector
    – Muhammad Rafique
    Nov 26 at 15:29










  • No. They do not span $mathbb{R}^3.$
    – Sean Roberson
    Nov 26 at 16:26














0












0








0







I have watched 3 blue one brown Essence of Linear Algebra tutorials enter link description here. I want to ask one question. Let suppose we have a 3x4 transformation matrix as follows



A =



7    3    -9    8

6 2 -8 7

8 4 0 7


The basis of vector A are



{ (7,3,-9,8), (6, 2, -8, 7), (8, 4, 0, 7) }


And here is the vector which is to be transformed



B =



1    2     4    5


When we will multiply the matrix with vector it will take it from R4 --> R3.
as



17   13    51


Please tell me, when we write the multiplication in terms of linear combination it is like that.



1 [ 7    6    8 ]  + 2 [ 3    2     4] + 4 [ -9   8    0 ] + 5 [ 8   7    7]


But as the video of 3blue one brown suggested for R2 --> R2 transformation.



a( transformed vector i ) +  b (transormed vector j) for vector to be transformed [a, b]


But in the case defined above it is streching its coloumns which are not vectors.



Please tell me the solution of this, or any wrong concept I have.
Thanks










share|cite|improve this question













I have watched 3 blue one brown Essence of Linear Algebra tutorials enter link description here. I want to ask one question. Let suppose we have a 3x4 transformation matrix as follows



A =



7    3    -9    8

6 2 -8 7

8 4 0 7


The basis of vector A are



{ (7,3,-9,8), (6, 2, -8, 7), (8, 4, 0, 7) }


And here is the vector which is to be transformed



B =



1    2     4    5


When we will multiply the matrix with vector it will take it from R4 --> R3.
as



17   13    51


Please tell me, when we write the multiplication in terms of linear combination it is like that.



1 [ 7    6    8 ]  + 2 [ 3    2     4] + 4 [ -9   8    0 ] + 5 [ 8   7    7]


But as the video of 3blue one brown suggested for R2 --> R2 transformation.



a( transformed vector i ) +  b (transormed vector j) for vector to be transformed [a, b]


But in the case defined above it is streching its coloumns which are not vectors.



Please tell me the solution of this, or any wrong concept I have.
Thanks







linear-algebra vector-spaces vectors linear-transformations






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Nov 26 at 15:17









Muhammad Rafique

11




11












  • When we talk about a basis, it is with respect to a vector space. $A$ is not a vector space here. Rather, the rows of $A$ form a basis for a subspace of $mathbb{R}^4.$
    – Sean Roberson
    Nov 26 at 15:21










  • Okay, yes we have 3 vectors from R4 which span R3. But my question is How exactly [ 1 2 4 5 ] are stretching the vectors of A to reach R3. In this case it is stretching in this way 1 [ 7 6 8 ] + 2 [ 3 2 4] + 4 [ -9 8 0 ] + 5 [ 8 7 7]. But [ 7 6 8] is not a vector
    – Muhammad Rafique
    Nov 26 at 15:29










  • No. They do not span $mathbb{R}^3.$
    – Sean Roberson
    Nov 26 at 16:26


















  • When we talk about a basis, it is with respect to a vector space. $A$ is not a vector space here. Rather, the rows of $A$ form a basis for a subspace of $mathbb{R}^4.$
    – Sean Roberson
    Nov 26 at 15:21










  • Okay, yes we have 3 vectors from R4 which span R3. But my question is How exactly [ 1 2 4 5 ] are stretching the vectors of A to reach R3. In this case it is stretching in this way 1 [ 7 6 8 ] + 2 [ 3 2 4] + 4 [ -9 8 0 ] + 5 [ 8 7 7]. But [ 7 6 8] is not a vector
    – Muhammad Rafique
    Nov 26 at 15:29










  • No. They do not span $mathbb{R}^3.$
    – Sean Roberson
    Nov 26 at 16:26
















When we talk about a basis, it is with respect to a vector space. $A$ is not a vector space here. Rather, the rows of $A$ form a basis for a subspace of $mathbb{R}^4.$
– Sean Roberson
Nov 26 at 15:21




When we talk about a basis, it is with respect to a vector space. $A$ is not a vector space here. Rather, the rows of $A$ form a basis for a subspace of $mathbb{R}^4.$
– Sean Roberson
Nov 26 at 15:21












Okay, yes we have 3 vectors from R4 which span R3. But my question is How exactly [ 1 2 4 5 ] are stretching the vectors of A to reach R3. In this case it is stretching in this way 1 [ 7 6 8 ] + 2 [ 3 2 4] + 4 [ -9 8 0 ] + 5 [ 8 7 7]. But [ 7 6 8] is not a vector
– Muhammad Rafique
Nov 26 at 15:29




Okay, yes we have 3 vectors from R4 which span R3. But my question is How exactly [ 1 2 4 5 ] are stretching the vectors of A to reach R3. In this case it is stretching in this way 1 [ 7 6 8 ] + 2 [ 3 2 4] + 4 [ -9 8 0 ] + 5 [ 8 7 7]. But [ 7 6 8] is not a vector
– Muhammad Rafique
Nov 26 at 15:29












No. They do not span $mathbb{R}^3.$
– Sean Roberson
Nov 26 at 16:26




No. They do not span $mathbb{R}^3.$
– Sean Roberson
Nov 26 at 16:26










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0














The columns of the matrix are vectors too, though in this case in $mathbb R^3$ (not $mathbb R^4$ like the rows).



It is a fact that the image of a linear transformation is always the span of the $mathbf{columns}$ of any matrix representing it.






share|cite|improve this answer























  • But how can columns be a vector. They do not have any magnitude or direction ? Please explain me
    – Muhammad Rafique
    Nov 26 at 15:31










  • Any $n$-tuple can be thought of as a vector.
    – Chris Custer
    Nov 26 at 15:33










  • @MuhammadRafique The "definition" of a vector being something that has magnitude and direction is incorrect. See a more complete definition of vector here. That being said, $left[begin{smallmatrix}7\6\8end{smallmatrix}right]$ does happen to have magnitude and direction when treated as an element in $Bbb R^3$ with the standard euclidean bases and metric... It is $7$ units in the $i$ direction, $6$ units in the $j$ direction and $8$ units in the $k$ direction and has magnitude $sqrt{7^2+6^2+8^2}$
    – JMoravitz
    Nov 26 at 15:35












  • But what will be its geometric interpretation. Like if we consider the rows of this vector we can understand that they have been created using the linear combination of basis vectors of that space. But how can we explain the origin of the column vectors. It means there will be whole different geometry for row vector and column vectors ?
    – Muhammad Rafique
    Nov 26 at 15:35










  • @MuhammadRafique read about row spaces and column spaces, two of the fundamental subspaces related to a matrix.
    – JMoravitz
    Nov 26 at 15:37











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3014452%2fwhat-exactly-are-bases-vectors%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









0














The columns of the matrix are vectors too, though in this case in $mathbb R^3$ (not $mathbb R^4$ like the rows).



It is a fact that the image of a linear transformation is always the span of the $mathbf{columns}$ of any matrix representing it.






share|cite|improve this answer























  • But how can columns be a vector. They do not have any magnitude or direction ? Please explain me
    – Muhammad Rafique
    Nov 26 at 15:31










  • Any $n$-tuple can be thought of as a vector.
    – Chris Custer
    Nov 26 at 15:33










  • @MuhammadRafique The "definition" of a vector being something that has magnitude and direction is incorrect. See a more complete definition of vector here. That being said, $left[begin{smallmatrix}7\6\8end{smallmatrix}right]$ does happen to have magnitude and direction when treated as an element in $Bbb R^3$ with the standard euclidean bases and metric... It is $7$ units in the $i$ direction, $6$ units in the $j$ direction and $8$ units in the $k$ direction and has magnitude $sqrt{7^2+6^2+8^2}$
    – JMoravitz
    Nov 26 at 15:35












  • But what will be its geometric interpretation. Like if we consider the rows of this vector we can understand that they have been created using the linear combination of basis vectors of that space. But how can we explain the origin of the column vectors. It means there will be whole different geometry for row vector and column vectors ?
    – Muhammad Rafique
    Nov 26 at 15:35










  • @MuhammadRafique read about row spaces and column spaces, two of the fundamental subspaces related to a matrix.
    – JMoravitz
    Nov 26 at 15:37
















0














The columns of the matrix are vectors too, though in this case in $mathbb R^3$ (not $mathbb R^4$ like the rows).



It is a fact that the image of a linear transformation is always the span of the $mathbf{columns}$ of any matrix representing it.






share|cite|improve this answer























  • But how can columns be a vector. They do not have any magnitude or direction ? Please explain me
    – Muhammad Rafique
    Nov 26 at 15:31










  • Any $n$-tuple can be thought of as a vector.
    – Chris Custer
    Nov 26 at 15:33










  • @MuhammadRafique The "definition" of a vector being something that has magnitude and direction is incorrect. See a more complete definition of vector here. That being said, $left[begin{smallmatrix}7\6\8end{smallmatrix}right]$ does happen to have magnitude and direction when treated as an element in $Bbb R^3$ with the standard euclidean bases and metric... It is $7$ units in the $i$ direction, $6$ units in the $j$ direction and $8$ units in the $k$ direction and has magnitude $sqrt{7^2+6^2+8^2}$
    – JMoravitz
    Nov 26 at 15:35












  • But what will be its geometric interpretation. Like if we consider the rows of this vector we can understand that they have been created using the linear combination of basis vectors of that space. But how can we explain the origin of the column vectors. It means there will be whole different geometry for row vector and column vectors ?
    – Muhammad Rafique
    Nov 26 at 15:35










  • @MuhammadRafique read about row spaces and column spaces, two of the fundamental subspaces related to a matrix.
    – JMoravitz
    Nov 26 at 15:37














0












0








0






The columns of the matrix are vectors too, though in this case in $mathbb R^3$ (not $mathbb R^4$ like the rows).



It is a fact that the image of a linear transformation is always the span of the $mathbf{columns}$ of any matrix representing it.






share|cite|improve this answer














The columns of the matrix are vectors too, though in this case in $mathbb R^3$ (not $mathbb R^4$ like the rows).



It is a fact that the image of a linear transformation is always the span of the $mathbf{columns}$ of any matrix representing it.







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Nov 26 at 15:43

























answered Nov 26 at 15:30









Chris Custer

10.8k3724




10.8k3724












  • But how can columns be a vector. They do not have any magnitude or direction ? Please explain me
    – Muhammad Rafique
    Nov 26 at 15:31










  • Any $n$-tuple can be thought of as a vector.
    – Chris Custer
    Nov 26 at 15:33










  • @MuhammadRafique The "definition" of a vector being something that has magnitude and direction is incorrect. See a more complete definition of vector here. That being said, $left[begin{smallmatrix}7\6\8end{smallmatrix}right]$ does happen to have magnitude and direction when treated as an element in $Bbb R^3$ with the standard euclidean bases and metric... It is $7$ units in the $i$ direction, $6$ units in the $j$ direction and $8$ units in the $k$ direction and has magnitude $sqrt{7^2+6^2+8^2}$
    – JMoravitz
    Nov 26 at 15:35












  • But what will be its geometric interpretation. Like if we consider the rows of this vector we can understand that they have been created using the linear combination of basis vectors of that space. But how can we explain the origin of the column vectors. It means there will be whole different geometry for row vector and column vectors ?
    – Muhammad Rafique
    Nov 26 at 15:35










  • @MuhammadRafique read about row spaces and column spaces, two of the fundamental subspaces related to a matrix.
    – JMoravitz
    Nov 26 at 15:37


















  • But how can columns be a vector. They do not have any magnitude or direction ? Please explain me
    – Muhammad Rafique
    Nov 26 at 15:31










  • Any $n$-tuple can be thought of as a vector.
    – Chris Custer
    Nov 26 at 15:33










  • @MuhammadRafique The "definition" of a vector being something that has magnitude and direction is incorrect. See a more complete definition of vector here. That being said, $left[begin{smallmatrix}7\6\8end{smallmatrix}right]$ does happen to have magnitude and direction when treated as an element in $Bbb R^3$ with the standard euclidean bases and metric... It is $7$ units in the $i$ direction, $6$ units in the $j$ direction and $8$ units in the $k$ direction and has magnitude $sqrt{7^2+6^2+8^2}$
    – JMoravitz
    Nov 26 at 15:35












  • But what will be its geometric interpretation. Like if we consider the rows of this vector we can understand that they have been created using the linear combination of basis vectors of that space. But how can we explain the origin of the column vectors. It means there will be whole different geometry for row vector and column vectors ?
    – Muhammad Rafique
    Nov 26 at 15:35










  • @MuhammadRafique read about row spaces and column spaces, two of the fundamental subspaces related to a matrix.
    – JMoravitz
    Nov 26 at 15:37
















But how can columns be a vector. They do not have any magnitude or direction ? Please explain me
– Muhammad Rafique
Nov 26 at 15:31




But how can columns be a vector. They do not have any magnitude or direction ? Please explain me
– Muhammad Rafique
Nov 26 at 15:31












Any $n$-tuple can be thought of as a vector.
– Chris Custer
Nov 26 at 15:33




Any $n$-tuple can be thought of as a vector.
– Chris Custer
Nov 26 at 15:33












@MuhammadRafique The "definition" of a vector being something that has magnitude and direction is incorrect. See a more complete definition of vector here. That being said, $left[begin{smallmatrix}7\6\8end{smallmatrix}right]$ does happen to have magnitude and direction when treated as an element in $Bbb R^3$ with the standard euclidean bases and metric... It is $7$ units in the $i$ direction, $6$ units in the $j$ direction and $8$ units in the $k$ direction and has magnitude $sqrt{7^2+6^2+8^2}$
– JMoravitz
Nov 26 at 15:35






@MuhammadRafique The "definition" of a vector being something that has magnitude and direction is incorrect. See a more complete definition of vector here. That being said, $left[begin{smallmatrix}7\6\8end{smallmatrix}right]$ does happen to have magnitude and direction when treated as an element in $Bbb R^3$ with the standard euclidean bases and metric... It is $7$ units in the $i$ direction, $6$ units in the $j$ direction and $8$ units in the $k$ direction and has magnitude $sqrt{7^2+6^2+8^2}$
– JMoravitz
Nov 26 at 15:35














But what will be its geometric interpretation. Like if we consider the rows of this vector we can understand that they have been created using the linear combination of basis vectors of that space. But how can we explain the origin of the column vectors. It means there will be whole different geometry for row vector and column vectors ?
– Muhammad Rafique
Nov 26 at 15:35




But what will be its geometric interpretation. Like if we consider the rows of this vector we can understand that they have been created using the linear combination of basis vectors of that space. But how can we explain the origin of the column vectors. It means there will be whole different geometry for row vector and column vectors ?
– Muhammad Rafique
Nov 26 at 15:35












@MuhammadRafique read about row spaces and column spaces, two of the fundamental subspaces related to a matrix.
– JMoravitz
Nov 26 at 15:37




@MuhammadRafique read about row spaces and column spaces, two of the fundamental subspaces related to a matrix.
– JMoravitz
Nov 26 at 15:37


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3014452%2fwhat-exactly-are-bases-vectors%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Quarter-circle Tiles

build a pushdown automaton that recognizes the reverse language of a given pushdown automaton?

Mont Emei