What is ground state useful for?
Many textbooks and research are oriented to computing or finding the ground state of a quantum mechanical system. Why is it such a big deal? What can be done once one has the ground state?
quantum-mechanics ground-state
add a comment |
Many textbooks and research are oriented to computing or finding the ground state of a quantum mechanical system. Why is it such a big deal? What can be done once one has the ground state?
quantum-mechanics ground-state
It is sometimes easier to get the full spectrum once a ground state is known. Also super symmetric partner potentials are a function of the ground state wave function. This is a seed for a lot of useful information.
– ggcg
2 hours ago
@ggcg That seems like an answer, rather than a comment.
– rob♦
2 hours ago
I'll give it a try.
– ggcg
2 hours ago
add a comment |
Many textbooks and research are oriented to computing or finding the ground state of a quantum mechanical system. Why is it such a big deal? What can be done once one has the ground state?
quantum-mechanics ground-state
Many textbooks and research are oriented to computing or finding the ground state of a quantum mechanical system. Why is it such a big deal? What can be done once one has the ground state?
quantum-mechanics ground-state
quantum-mechanics ground-state
asked 3 hours ago
Vladimir Vargas
669412
669412
It is sometimes easier to get the full spectrum once a ground state is known. Also super symmetric partner potentials are a function of the ground state wave function. This is a seed for a lot of useful information.
– ggcg
2 hours ago
@ggcg That seems like an answer, rather than a comment.
– rob♦
2 hours ago
I'll give it a try.
– ggcg
2 hours ago
add a comment |
It is sometimes easier to get the full spectrum once a ground state is known. Also super symmetric partner potentials are a function of the ground state wave function. This is a seed for a lot of useful information.
– ggcg
2 hours ago
@ggcg That seems like an answer, rather than a comment.
– rob♦
2 hours ago
I'll give it a try.
– ggcg
2 hours ago
It is sometimes easier to get the full spectrum once a ground state is known. Also super symmetric partner potentials are a function of the ground state wave function. This is a seed for a lot of useful information.
– ggcg
2 hours ago
It is sometimes easier to get the full spectrum once a ground state is known. Also super symmetric partner potentials are a function of the ground state wave function. This is a seed for a lot of useful information.
– ggcg
2 hours ago
@ggcg That seems like an answer, rather than a comment.
– rob♦
2 hours ago
@ggcg That seems like an answer, rather than a comment.
– rob♦
2 hours ago
I'll give it a try.
– ggcg
2 hours ago
I'll give it a try.
– ggcg
2 hours ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
The ground state is often the state of lowest energy, i.e. the state that nature will most probably occupy, and if not, there must be a reason why not, a reason why the system should be excited.
In addition, the ground state is very often the zero-order approximation, e.g. of perturbation theory or mean-field approximation, so the ground state gives the highest contribution to your solution and the higher orders will give certain, maybe in your case even negligible, contributions or corrections to the calculated energy level.
It gives you a raw estimate of whatever solution you are looking for.
Sorry I don't see how the ground state is a zeroth-order approximation? Approximation to what? It is certainly not the zeroth-order approximation to any excited state...
– ZeroTheHero
2 hours ago
add a comment |
Here is my comment in the form of an answer.
It is sometimes easier to get the full spectrum once a ground state is known. For example the full Schrodinger equation may not be solvable exactly but the ground state may be calculable, along with an energy value. It may also happen that a recursion relation among the higher energy states might be discoverable w/o solving the equation for the eigen functions. If this occurs then the entire spectrum can be determined if the ground state is known. There are a couple famous examples that are in most text books (and serve as a primary reason for focusing on ground states). I suspect your text has these examples in it. I do not recall them off the top of my head but I recall using variation of parameters to get a ground state energy level.
Also super symmetric partner potentials are a function of the ground state wave function. In my opinion this is a better reason to care about ground states. The SHO is an example of a self similar potential so you can generate the entire spectrum from the ground state. In general if you have the spectrum of one system you can define a generalization of the creation and annihilation operators, with a product that gives the Hamiltonian. Reversing the order gives an entirely new Hamiltonian. You can generate the entire set of eigen functions and eigen values for the new Hamiltonian by applying the step operators to the old set of functions, and the spectra line up. All but the ground state. So you need to find the ground state of the new system "by hand".
The SUSY QM is a special case of SUSY QFT from what I recall. This is a seed for a lot of useful information. You can look up a Physics Reports from the 80s on SUSY QM by Cooper, Sukhatme, et al for more details.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "151"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f450875%2fwhat-is-ground-state-useful-for%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
The ground state is often the state of lowest energy, i.e. the state that nature will most probably occupy, and if not, there must be a reason why not, a reason why the system should be excited.
In addition, the ground state is very often the zero-order approximation, e.g. of perturbation theory or mean-field approximation, so the ground state gives the highest contribution to your solution and the higher orders will give certain, maybe in your case even negligible, contributions or corrections to the calculated energy level.
It gives you a raw estimate of whatever solution you are looking for.
Sorry I don't see how the ground state is a zeroth-order approximation? Approximation to what? It is certainly not the zeroth-order approximation to any excited state...
– ZeroTheHero
2 hours ago
add a comment |
The ground state is often the state of lowest energy, i.e. the state that nature will most probably occupy, and if not, there must be a reason why not, a reason why the system should be excited.
In addition, the ground state is very often the zero-order approximation, e.g. of perturbation theory or mean-field approximation, so the ground state gives the highest contribution to your solution and the higher orders will give certain, maybe in your case even negligible, contributions or corrections to the calculated energy level.
It gives you a raw estimate of whatever solution you are looking for.
Sorry I don't see how the ground state is a zeroth-order approximation? Approximation to what? It is certainly not the zeroth-order approximation to any excited state...
– ZeroTheHero
2 hours ago
add a comment |
The ground state is often the state of lowest energy, i.e. the state that nature will most probably occupy, and if not, there must be a reason why not, a reason why the system should be excited.
In addition, the ground state is very often the zero-order approximation, e.g. of perturbation theory or mean-field approximation, so the ground state gives the highest contribution to your solution and the higher orders will give certain, maybe in your case even negligible, contributions or corrections to the calculated energy level.
It gives you a raw estimate of whatever solution you are looking for.
The ground state is often the state of lowest energy, i.e. the state that nature will most probably occupy, and if not, there must be a reason why not, a reason why the system should be excited.
In addition, the ground state is very often the zero-order approximation, e.g. of perturbation theory or mean-field approximation, so the ground state gives the highest contribution to your solution and the higher orders will give certain, maybe in your case even negligible, contributions or corrections to the calculated energy level.
It gives you a raw estimate of whatever solution you are looking for.
answered 3 hours ago
kalle
381114
381114
Sorry I don't see how the ground state is a zeroth-order approximation? Approximation to what? It is certainly not the zeroth-order approximation to any excited state...
– ZeroTheHero
2 hours ago
add a comment |
Sorry I don't see how the ground state is a zeroth-order approximation? Approximation to what? It is certainly not the zeroth-order approximation to any excited state...
– ZeroTheHero
2 hours ago
Sorry I don't see how the ground state is a zeroth-order approximation? Approximation to what? It is certainly not the zeroth-order approximation to any excited state...
– ZeroTheHero
2 hours ago
Sorry I don't see how the ground state is a zeroth-order approximation? Approximation to what? It is certainly not the zeroth-order approximation to any excited state...
– ZeroTheHero
2 hours ago
add a comment |
Here is my comment in the form of an answer.
It is sometimes easier to get the full spectrum once a ground state is known. For example the full Schrodinger equation may not be solvable exactly but the ground state may be calculable, along with an energy value. It may also happen that a recursion relation among the higher energy states might be discoverable w/o solving the equation for the eigen functions. If this occurs then the entire spectrum can be determined if the ground state is known. There are a couple famous examples that are in most text books (and serve as a primary reason for focusing on ground states). I suspect your text has these examples in it. I do not recall them off the top of my head but I recall using variation of parameters to get a ground state energy level.
Also super symmetric partner potentials are a function of the ground state wave function. In my opinion this is a better reason to care about ground states. The SHO is an example of a self similar potential so you can generate the entire spectrum from the ground state. In general if you have the spectrum of one system you can define a generalization of the creation and annihilation operators, with a product that gives the Hamiltonian. Reversing the order gives an entirely new Hamiltonian. You can generate the entire set of eigen functions and eigen values for the new Hamiltonian by applying the step operators to the old set of functions, and the spectra line up. All but the ground state. So you need to find the ground state of the new system "by hand".
The SUSY QM is a special case of SUSY QFT from what I recall. This is a seed for a lot of useful information. You can look up a Physics Reports from the 80s on SUSY QM by Cooper, Sukhatme, et al for more details.
add a comment |
Here is my comment in the form of an answer.
It is sometimes easier to get the full spectrum once a ground state is known. For example the full Schrodinger equation may not be solvable exactly but the ground state may be calculable, along with an energy value. It may also happen that a recursion relation among the higher energy states might be discoverable w/o solving the equation for the eigen functions. If this occurs then the entire spectrum can be determined if the ground state is known. There are a couple famous examples that are in most text books (and serve as a primary reason for focusing on ground states). I suspect your text has these examples in it. I do not recall them off the top of my head but I recall using variation of parameters to get a ground state energy level.
Also super symmetric partner potentials are a function of the ground state wave function. In my opinion this is a better reason to care about ground states. The SHO is an example of a self similar potential so you can generate the entire spectrum from the ground state. In general if you have the spectrum of one system you can define a generalization of the creation and annihilation operators, with a product that gives the Hamiltonian. Reversing the order gives an entirely new Hamiltonian. You can generate the entire set of eigen functions and eigen values for the new Hamiltonian by applying the step operators to the old set of functions, and the spectra line up. All but the ground state. So you need to find the ground state of the new system "by hand".
The SUSY QM is a special case of SUSY QFT from what I recall. This is a seed for a lot of useful information. You can look up a Physics Reports from the 80s on SUSY QM by Cooper, Sukhatme, et al for more details.
add a comment |
Here is my comment in the form of an answer.
It is sometimes easier to get the full spectrum once a ground state is known. For example the full Schrodinger equation may not be solvable exactly but the ground state may be calculable, along with an energy value. It may also happen that a recursion relation among the higher energy states might be discoverable w/o solving the equation for the eigen functions. If this occurs then the entire spectrum can be determined if the ground state is known. There are a couple famous examples that are in most text books (and serve as a primary reason for focusing on ground states). I suspect your text has these examples in it. I do not recall them off the top of my head but I recall using variation of parameters to get a ground state energy level.
Also super symmetric partner potentials are a function of the ground state wave function. In my opinion this is a better reason to care about ground states. The SHO is an example of a self similar potential so you can generate the entire spectrum from the ground state. In general if you have the spectrum of one system you can define a generalization of the creation and annihilation operators, with a product that gives the Hamiltonian. Reversing the order gives an entirely new Hamiltonian. You can generate the entire set of eigen functions and eigen values for the new Hamiltonian by applying the step operators to the old set of functions, and the spectra line up. All but the ground state. So you need to find the ground state of the new system "by hand".
The SUSY QM is a special case of SUSY QFT from what I recall. This is a seed for a lot of useful information. You can look up a Physics Reports from the 80s on SUSY QM by Cooper, Sukhatme, et al for more details.
Here is my comment in the form of an answer.
It is sometimes easier to get the full spectrum once a ground state is known. For example the full Schrodinger equation may not be solvable exactly but the ground state may be calculable, along with an energy value. It may also happen that a recursion relation among the higher energy states might be discoverable w/o solving the equation for the eigen functions. If this occurs then the entire spectrum can be determined if the ground state is known. There are a couple famous examples that are in most text books (and serve as a primary reason for focusing on ground states). I suspect your text has these examples in it. I do not recall them off the top of my head but I recall using variation of parameters to get a ground state energy level.
Also super symmetric partner potentials are a function of the ground state wave function. In my opinion this is a better reason to care about ground states. The SHO is an example of a self similar potential so you can generate the entire spectrum from the ground state. In general if you have the spectrum of one system you can define a generalization of the creation and annihilation operators, with a product that gives the Hamiltonian. Reversing the order gives an entirely new Hamiltonian. You can generate the entire set of eigen functions and eigen values for the new Hamiltonian by applying the step operators to the old set of functions, and the spectra line up. All but the ground state. So you need to find the ground state of the new system "by hand".
The SUSY QM is a special case of SUSY QFT from what I recall. This is a seed for a lot of useful information. You can look up a Physics Reports from the 80s on SUSY QM by Cooper, Sukhatme, et al for more details.
answered 2 hours ago
ggcg
1,01613
1,01613
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Physics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f450875%2fwhat-is-ground-state-useful-for%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
It is sometimes easier to get the full spectrum once a ground state is known. Also super symmetric partner potentials are a function of the ground state wave function. This is a seed for a lot of useful information.
– ggcg
2 hours ago
@ggcg That seems like an answer, rather than a comment.
– rob♦
2 hours ago
I'll give it a try.
– ggcg
2 hours ago