Attempt on modified harmonic series












2















Does the series $left(1+frac{1}{2}-frac{1}{3} right) + left(frac{1}{4}+frac{1}{5}-frac{1}{6} right)+left(frac{1}{7}+frac{1}{8}-frac{1}{9} right)+ldots quad$ converge?




Here's my attempt at a solution: begin{eqnarray*}left(1+frac{1}{2}-frac{1}{3} right) + left(frac{1}{4}+frac{1}{5}-frac{1}{6} right)+left(frac{1}{7}+frac{1}{8}-frac{1}{9} right)+ldots &= sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac{1}{n}-2sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac{1}{3n}\&=sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac{1}{3n} \ &=frac{1}{3}sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac{1}{n} end{eqnarray*}



As we can "rewrite" this series as one third of the harmonical series (that diverges), we conclude the divergence of the requiered series.



Is this right? Which other convergence tests could be used?

Thanks in advance.






calculus sequences-and-series proof-verification divergent-series







share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




Raúl Astete is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




















  • your solution is not correct. You cannot change the order of summation of a series that doesn't converge absolutely, neither make (standard) arithmetic with divergent series
    – Masacroso
    27 mins ago












  • @Masacroso Is it not fine to do something along the lines of " Suppose the following series converges. Then in particular, it converges absolutely, so we can reorder the series in any way. One particular ordering gives a scalar multiple of the harmonic series which diverges, so the given series cannot converge".
    – Saad
    21 mins ago
















2















Does the series $left(1+frac{1}{2}-frac{1}{3} right) + left(frac{1}{4}+frac{1}{5}-frac{1}{6} right)+left(frac{1}{7}+frac{1}{8}-frac{1}{9} right)+ldots quad$ converge?




Here's my attempt at a solution: begin{eqnarray*}left(1+frac{1}{2}-frac{1}{3} right) + left(frac{1}{4}+frac{1}{5}-frac{1}{6} right)+left(frac{1}{7}+frac{1}{8}-frac{1}{9} right)+ldots &= sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac{1}{n}-2sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac{1}{3n}\&=sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac{1}{3n} \ &=frac{1}{3}sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac{1}{n} end{eqnarray*}



As we can "rewrite" this series as one third of the harmonical series (that diverges), we conclude the divergence of the requiered series.



Is this right? Which other convergence tests could be used?

Thanks in advance.






calculus sequences-and-series proof-verification divergent-series







share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




Raúl Astete is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




















  • your solution is not correct. You cannot change the order of summation of a series that doesn't converge absolutely, neither make (standard) arithmetic with divergent series
    – Masacroso
    27 mins ago












  • @Masacroso Is it not fine to do something along the lines of " Suppose the following series converges. Then in particular, it converges absolutely, so we can reorder the series in any way. One particular ordering gives a scalar multiple of the harmonic series which diverges, so the given series cannot converge".
    – Saad
    21 mins ago














2












2








2








Does the series $left(1+frac{1}{2}-frac{1}{3} right) + left(frac{1}{4}+frac{1}{5}-frac{1}{6} right)+left(frac{1}{7}+frac{1}{8}-frac{1}{9} right)+ldots quad$ converge?




Here's my attempt at a solution: begin{eqnarray*}left(1+frac{1}{2}-frac{1}{3} right) + left(frac{1}{4}+frac{1}{5}-frac{1}{6} right)+left(frac{1}{7}+frac{1}{8}-frac{1}{9} right)+ldots &= sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac{1}{n}-2sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac{1}{3n}\&=sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac{1}{3n} \ &=frac{1}{3}sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac{1}{n} end{eqnarray*}



As we can "rewrite" this series as one third of the harmonical series (that diverges), we conclude the divergence of the requiered series.



Is this right? Which other convergence tests could be used?

Thanks in advance.






calculus sequences-and-series proof-verification divergent-series







share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




Raúl Astete is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












Does the series $left(1+frac{1}{2}-frac{1}{3} right) + left(frac{1}{4}+frac{1}{5}-frac{1}{6} right)+left(frac{1}{7}+frac{1}{8}-frac{1}{9} right)+ldots quad$ converge?




Here's my attempt at a solution: begin{eqnarray*}left(1+frac{1}{2}-frac{1}{3} right) + left(frac{1}{4}+frac{1}{5}-frac{1}{6} right)+left(frac{1}{7}+frac{1}{8}-frac{1}{9} right)+ldots &= sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac{1}{n}-2sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac{1}{3n}\&=sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac{1}{3n} \ &=frac{1}{3}sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac{1}{n} end{eqnarray*}



As we can "rewrite" this series as one third of the harmonical series (that diverges), we conclude the divergence of the requiered series.



Is this right? Which other convergence tests could be used?

Thanks in advance.






calculus sequences-and-series proof-verification divergent-series




calculus sequences-and-series proof-verification divergent-series






share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




Raúl Astete is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




Raúl Astete is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question






New contributor




Raúl Astete is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 59 mins ago









Raúl Astete

235




235




New contributor




Raúl Astete is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Raúl Astete is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Raúl Astete is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












  • your solution is not correct. You cannot change the order of summation of a series that doesn't converge absolutely, neither make (standard) arithmetic with divergent series
    – Masacroso
    27 mins ago












  • @Masacroso Is it not fine to do something along the lines of " Suppose the following series converges. Then in particular, it converges absolutely, so we can reorder the series in any way. One particular ordering gives a scalar multiple of the harmonic series which diverges, so the given series cannot converge".
    – Saad
    21 mins ago


















  • your solution is not correct. You cannot change the order of summation of a series that doesn't converge absolutely, neither make (standard) arithmetic with divergent series
    – Masacroso
    27 mins ago












  • @Masacroso Is it not fine to do something along the lines of " Suppose the following series converges. Then in particular, it converges absolutely, so we can reorder the series in any way. One particular ordering gives a scalar multiple of the harmonic series which diverges, so the given series cannot converge".
    – Saad
    21 mins ago
















your solution is not correct. You cannot change the order of summation of a series that doesn't converge absolutely, neither make (standard) arithmetic with divergent series
– Masacroso
27 mins ago






your solution is not correct. You cannot change the order of summation of a series that doesn't converge absolutely, neither make (standard) arithmetic with divergent series
– Masacroso
27 mins ago














@Masacroso Is it not fine to do something along the lines of " Suppose the following series converges. Then in particular, it converges absolutely, so we can reorder the series in any way. One particular ordering gives a scalar multiple of the harmonic series which diverges, so the given series cannot converge".
– Saad
21 mins ago




@Masacroso Is it not fine to do something along the lines of " Suppose the following series converges. Then in particular, it converges absolutely, so we can reorder the series in any way. One particular ordering gives a scalar multiple of the harmonic series which diverges, so the given series cannot converge".
– Saad
21 mins ago










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















3














Your answer is correct, but your reasoning is not. Order matters. You should write the sum as follows:
$$sum_{n=0}^inftyleft(frac{1}{3n+1}+frac{1}{3n+2}-frac{1}{3n+3}right)$$
Simplify what is in the parentheses and then evaluate in the usual way.



Oh, and it is true that order does not matter if all the terms are positive. But when some terms are positive and others negative, you have to be more careful.






share|cite|improve this answer































    2














    The idea is correct, but you cannot write like that, because the series involved are both divergent and generally it is moot to do arithmetic operations of divergent series.



    Let $H_n = sum_1^n 1/k$, i.e. the $n$-th partial sum of the harmonic series, then the
    $$
    S_n = H_{3n} - frac 23 H_n,
    $$
    then use the asymptotic expression $H_n = log n + gamma + varepsilon_n$ where $varepsilon_n to 0 [n to infty]$, we have
    $$
    S_n = log (3n) -frac 23log n + frac 13 gamma + varepsilon_{3n} - frac 23 varepsilon_n = log(3n^{1/3}) + frac 13 gamma + alpha_n xrightarrow{n to infty} +infty.
    $$






    share|cite|improve this answer





























      1














      Yes, your answer is correct.



      By using Cauchy's Convergence test, for $sum_{n=1}^inftydfrac1n$



      Taking $$S_{2n}-S_n=sum_{n=1}^{2n}dfrac1n-sum_{n=1}^ndfrac1n=dfrac{1}{n+1}+dfrac{1}{n+2}+....+dfrac{1}{2n}gedfrac{1}{2n}+....+dfrac{1}{2n}=dfrac{n}{2n}=dfrac{1}{2}$$



      Since, there is no number $N$ that satisfies Cauchy's condition, the series diverges.






      share|cite|improve this answer





















        Your Answer





        StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
        return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
        StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
        StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
        });
        });
        }, "mathjax-editing");

        StackExchange.ready(function() {
        var channelOptions = {
        tags: "".split(" "),
        id: "69"
        };
        initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
        // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
        if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
        createEditor();
        });
        }
        else {
        createEditor();
        }
        });

        function createEditor() {
        StackExchange.prepareEditor({
        heartbeatType: 'answer',
        autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
        convertImagesToLinks: true,
        noModals: true,
        showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
        reputationToPostImages: 10,
        bindNavPrevention: true,
        postfix: "",
        imageUploader: {
        brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
        contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
        allowUrls: true
        },
        noCode: true, onDemand: true,
        discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
        ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
        });


        }
        });






        Raúl Astete is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










        draft saved

        draft discarded


















        StackExchange.ready(
        function () {
        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3063422%2fattempt-on-modified-harmonic-series%23new-answer', 'question_page');
        }
        );

        Post as a guest















        Required, but never shown

























        3 Answers
        3






        active

        oldest

        votes








        3 Answers
        3






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes









        3














        Your answer is correct, but your reasoning is not. Order matters. You should write the sum as follows:
        $$sum_{n=0}^inftyleft(frac{1}{3n+1}+frac{1}{3n+2}-frac{1}{3n+3}right)$$
        Simplify what is in the parentheses and then evaluate in the usual way.



        Oh, and it is true that order does not matter if all the terms are positive. But when some terms are positive and others negative, you have to be more careful.






        share|cite|improve this answer




























          3














          Your answer is correct, but your reasoning is not. Order matters. You should write the sum as follows:
          $$sum_{n=0}^inftyleft(frac{1}{3n+1}+frac{1}{3n+2}-frac{1}{3n+3}right)$$
          Simplify what is in the parentheses and then evaluate in the usual way.



          Oh, and it is true that order does not matter if all the terms are positive. But when some terms are positive and others negative, you have to be more careful.






          share|cite|improve this answer


























            3












            3








            3






            Your answer is correct, but your reasoning is not. Order matters. You should write the sum as follows:
            $$sum_{n=0}^inftyleft(frac{1}{3n+1}+frac{1}{3n+2}-frac{1}{3n+3}right)$$
            Simplify what is in the parentheses and then evaluate in the usual way.



            Oh, and it is true that order does not matter if all the terms are positive. But when some terms are positive and others negative, you have to be more careful.






            share|cite|improve this answer














            Your answer is correct, but your reasoning is not. Order matters. You should write the sum as follows:
            $$sum_{n=0}^inftyleft(frac{1}{3n+1}+frac{1}{3n+2}-frac{1}{3n+3}right)$$
            Simplify what is in the parentheses and then evaluate in the usual way.



            Oh, and it is true that order does not matter if all the terms are positive. But when some terms are positive and others negative, you have to be more careful.







            share|cite|improve this answer














            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer








            edited 32 mins ago

























            answered 39 mins ago









            Ben W

            1,800514




            1,800514























                2














                The idea is correct, but you cannot write like that, because the series involved are both divergent and generally it is moot to do arithmetic operations of divergent series.



                Let $H_n = sum_1^n 1/k$, i.e. the $n$-th partial sum of the harmonic series, then the
                $$
                S_n = H_{3n} - frac 23 H_n,
                $$
                then use the asymptotic expression $H_n = log n + gamma + varepsilon_n$ where $varepsilon_n to 0 [n to infty]$, we have
                $$
                S_n = log (3n) -frac 23log n + frac 13 gamma + varepsilon_{3n} - frac 23 varepsilon_n = log(3n^{1/3}) + frac 13 gamma + alpha_n xrightarrow{n to infty} +infty.
                $$






                share|cite|improve this answer


























                  2














                  The idea is correct, but you cannot write like that, because the series involved are both divergent and generally it is moot to do arithmetic operations of divergent series.



                  Let $H_n = sum_1^n 1/k$, i.e. the $n$-th partial sum of the harmonic series, then the
                  $$
                  S_n = H_{3n} - frac 23 H_n,
                  $$
                  then use the asymptotic expression $H_n = log n + gamma + varepsilon_n$ where $varepsilon_n to 0 [n to infty]$, we have
                  $$
                  S_n = log (3n) -frac 23log n + frac 13 gamma + varepsilon_{3n} - frac 23 varepsilon_n = log(3n^{1/3}) + frac 13 gamma + alpha_n xrightarrow{n to infty} +infty.
                  $$






                  share|cite|improve this answer
























                    2












                    2








                    2






                    The idea is correct, but you cannot write like that, because the series involved are both divergent and generally it is moot to do arithmetic operations of divergent series.



                    Let $H_n = sum_1^n 1/k$, i.e. the $n$-th partial sum of the harmonic series, then the
                    $$
                    S_n = H_{3n} - frac 23 H_n,
                    $$
                    then use the asymptotic expression $H_n = log n + gamma + varepsilon_n$ where $varepsilon_n to 0 [n to infty]$, we have
                    $$
                    S_n = log (3n) -frac 23log n + frac 13 gamma + varepsilon_{3n} - frac 23 varepsilon_n = log(3n^{1/3}) + frac 13 gamma + alpha_n xrightarrow{n to infty} +infty.
                    $$






                    share|cite|improve this answer












                    The idea is correct, but you cannot write like that, because the series involved are both divergent and generally it is moot to do arithmetic operations of divergent series.



                    Let $H_n = sum_1^n 1/k$, i.e. the $n$-th partial sum of the harmonic series, then the
                    $$
                    S_n = H_{3n} - frac 23 H_n,
                    $$
                    then use the asymptotic expression $H_n = log n + gamma + varepsilon_n$ where $varepsilon_n to 0 [n to infty]$, we have
                    $$
                    S_n = log (3n) -frac 23log n + frac 13 gamma + varepsilon_{3n} - frac 23 varepsilon_n = log(3n^{1/3}) + frac 13 gamma + alpha_n xrightarrow{n to infty} +infty.
                    $$







                    share|cite|improve this answer












                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer










                    answered 29 mins ago









                    xbh

                    5,6951522




                    5,6951522























                        1














                        Yes, your answer is correct.



                        By using Cauchy's Convergence test, for $sum_{n=1}^inftydfrac1n$



                        Taking $$S_{2n}-S_n=sum_{n=1}^{2n}dfrac1n-sum_{n=1}^ndfrac1n=dfrac{1}{n+1}+dfrac{1}{n+2}+....+dfrac{1}{2n}gedfrac{1}{2n}+....+dfrac{1}{2n}=dfrac{n}{2n}=dfrac{1}{2}$$



                        Since, there is no number $N$ that satisfies Cauchy's condition, the series diverges.






                        share|cite|improve this answer


























                          1














                          Yes, your answer is correct.



                          By using Cauchy's Convergence test, for $sum_{n=1}^inftydfrac1n$



                          Taking $$S_{2n}-S_n=sum_{n=1}^{2n}dfrac1n-sum_{n=1}^ndfrac1n=dfrac{1}{n+1}+dfrac{1}{n+2}+....+dfrac{1}{2n}gedfrac{1}{2n}+....+dfrac{1}{2n}=dfrac{n}{2n}=dfrac{1}{2}$$



                          Since, there is no number $N$ that satisfies Cauchy's condition, the series diverges.






                          share|cite|improve this answer
























                            1












                            1








                            1






                            Yes, your answer is correct.



                            By using Cauchy's Convergence test, for $sum_{n=1}^inftydfrac1n$



                            Taking $$S_{2n}-S_n=sum_{n=1}^{2n}dfrac1n-sum_{n=1}^ndfrac1n=dfrac{1}{n+1}+dfrac{1}{n+2}+....+dfrac{1}{2n}gedfrac{1}{2n}+....+dfrac{1}{2n}=dfrac{n}{2n}=dfrac{1}{2}$$



                            Since, there is no number $N$ that satisfies Cauchy's condition, the series diverges.






                            share|cite|improve this answer












                            Yes, your answer is correct.



                            By using Cauchy's Convergence test, for $sum_{n=1}^inftydfrac1n$



                            Taking $$S_{2n}-S_n=sum_{n=1}^{2n}dfrac1n-sum_{n=1}^ndfrac1n=dfrac{1}{n+1}+dfrac{1}{n+2}+....+dfrac{1}{2n}gedfrac{1}{2n}+....+dfrac{1}{2n}=dfrac{n}{2n}=dfrac{1}{2}$$



                            Since, there is no number $N$ that satisfies Cauchy's condition, the series diverges.







                            share|cite|improve this answer












                            share|cite|improve this answer



                            share|cite|improve this answer










                            answered 43 mins ago









                            Key Flex

                            7,56241232




                            7,56241232






















                                Raúl Astete is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










                                draft saved

                                draft discarded


















                                Raúl Astete is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













                                Raúl Astete is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                                Raúl Astete is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















                                Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid …



                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                                Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                                Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid …



                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                draft saved


                                draft discarded














                                StackExchange.ready(
                                function () {
                                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3063422%2fattempt-on-modified-harmonic-series%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                }
                                );

                                Post as a guest















                                Required, but never shown





















































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown

































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown







                                -

                                Popular posts from this blog

                                Ellipse (mathématiques)

                                Image
                                Pour les articles homonymes, voir Ellipse. L'ellipse est le lieu des points dont la somme des distances à deux points fixes, dits foyers, est constante. Section du cône ou projection du cercle. En géométrie, une ellipse est une courbe plane fermée obtenue par l’intersection d’un cône de révolution avec un plan, à condition que celui-ci coupe l'axe de rotation du cône ou du cylindre : c'est une conique d'excentricité strictement comprise entre 0 et 1. On peut également la définir comme le lieu des points dont la somme des distances à deux points fixes, dits foyers, est constante (sa construction par la méthode du jardinier est très simple). Dans la vie courante, l’ellipse est la forme qu'on perçoit en regardant un cercle en perspective, ou la figure formée par l’ombre d'un disque sur une surface plane. On retrouve aussi, en première approximation [ 1 ] , des ellipses dans les trajectoires des corps célestes (planètes, comètes ou satellites arti...
                                Read more

                                Quarter-circle Tiles

                                Image
                                up vote 0 down vote favorite I have $99$ identical square tiles, each with a quarter-circle drawn on it like this: [asy] size(1.5cm); draw(Arc((2,0),1,90,180),red+1); draw((0,0)--(2,0)--(2,2)--(0,2)--(0,0)); [/asy] When I arrange the tiles in a $9times 11$ rectangular grid, each with a random orientation, what is the expected value of the number of full circles I form? I think this problem has to do with finding the chance any given 2x2 square has a circle, but I can't find it. expected-value share | cite | improve this question asked Nov 20 at 15:03 6minecraftninja 1 2 ...
                                Read more

                                Mont Emei

                                Image
                                Mont Emei.mw-parser-output .entete.map{background-image:url("//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/7a/Picto_infobox_map.png")} Vue du sommet Wanfo du mont Emei Géographie Altitude 3 099  m , Wanfo Coordonnées 29° 31′ 11″ nord, 103° 19′ 57″ est Administration Pays   Chine Province Sichuan Ville-préfecture Leshan Géolocalisation sur la carte : Sichuan Mont Emei Géolocalisation sur la carte : Chine Mont Emei modifier   Paysage panoramique du mont Emei, incluant le paysage panoramique du grand Bouddha de Leshan *   Patrimoine mondial de l'UNESCO Passerelle en bois sur le versant ouest Pays   Chine Subdivision Sichuan Type Mixte Critères (iv) (vi) (x) Superficie 15 400 ha Numéro d’identification 779 Zone géographique Asie et Pacifique  ** Année d’inscription 1996 (20 e session) * Descriptif officiel UNESCO ** Classification géog...
                                Read more