Convergence of ${a_n}$ given that $b_n = a_n + 1/a_n$ converges












5














I am given a sequence ${a_n}$ with $a_n > 0$ and $b_n = a_n + 1/a_n$.



I am first asked to assume that $a_n ge 1$ and show that the convergence of ${b_n}$ implies the convergence of ${a_n}$.



My argument is:



Since ${b_n}$ converges, ${b_n}$ is Cauchy, hence for every $epsilon > 0$ some $N$ such that for $n_i,n_j > N$, $|b_{n_i} - b_{n_j}| < epsilon$. Then $|b_{n_i} - b_{n_j}| = |a_{n_i} - a_{n_j} + 1/a_{n_i} - 1/a_{n_j}| < epsilon$. Suppose that $a_{n_i} = a_{n_j}$. Then clearly $|a_{n_i} - a_{n_j}| < epsilon$. Alternatively, suppose without loss of generality that $a_{n_i} > a_{n_j}$. Then $1/a_{n_i} - 1/a_{n_j} < 0$ while $a_{n_i} - a_{n_j} > 0$. It is straightforward to observe that $-(1/a_{n_i} - 1/a_{n_j}) le a_{n_i} - a_{n_j}$ because of the condition $a_n ge 0$, so it follows that $0 < |a_{n_i} - a_{n_j}| < |a_{n_i} - a_{n_j}|$, so then $|a_{n_i} - a_{n_j}| < |a_{n_i} - a_{n_j} + 1/a_{n_i} - 1/a_{n_j}| < epsilon$, hence ${a_n}$ is Cauchy and therefore converges.



However, I am next asked to assume that ${b_n}$ converges but only that $a_n > 0$ and demonstrate, through construction of a counterexample, that it does not necessarily follow that ${a_n}$ converges. I am not entirely sure how to do this.










share|cite|improve this question



























    5














    I am given a sequence ${a_n}$ with $a_n > 0$ and $b_n = a_n + 1/a_n$.



    I am first asked to assume that $a_n ge 1$ and show that the convergence of ${b_n}$ implies the convergence of ${a_n}$.



    My argument is:



    Since ${b_n}$ converges, ${b_n}$ is Cauchy, hence for every $epsilon > 0$ some $N$ such that for $n_i,n_j > N$, $|b_{n_i} - b_{n_j}| < epsilon$. Then $|b_{n_i} - b_{n_j}| = |a_{n_i} - a_{n_j} + 1/a_{n_i} - 1/a_{n_j}| < epsilon$. Suppose that $a_{n_i} = a_{n_j}$. Then clearly $|a_{n_i} - a_{n_j}| < epsilon$. Alternatively, suppose without loss of generality that $a_{n_i} > a_{n_j}$. Then $1/a_{n_i} - 1/a_{n_j} < 0$ while $a_{n_i} - a_{n_j} > 0$. It is straightforward to observe that $-(1/a_{n_i} - 1/a_{n_j}) le a_{n_i} - a_{n_j}$ because of the condition $a_n ge 0$, so it follows that $0 < |a_{n_i} - a_{n_j}| < |a_{n_i} - a_{n_j}|$, so then $|a_{n_i} - a_{n_j}| < |a_{n_i} - a_{n_j} + 1/a_{n_i} - 1/a_{n_j}| < epsilon$, hence ${a_n}$ is Cauchy and therefore converges.



    However, I am next asked to assume that ${b_n}$ converges but only that $a_n > 0$ and demonstrate, through construction of a counterexample, that it does not necessarily follow that ${a_n}$ converges. I am not entirely sure how to do this.










    share|cite|improve this question

























      5












      5








      5







      I am given a sequence ${a_n}$ with $a_n > 0$ and $b_n = a_n + 1/a_n$.



      I am first asked to assume that $a_n ge 1$ and show that the convergence of ${b_n}$ implies the convergence of ${a_n}$.



      My argument is:



      Since ${b_n}$ converges, ${b_n}$ is Cauchy, hence for every $epsilon > 0$ some $N$ such that for $n_i,n_j > N$, $|b_{n_i} - b_{n_j}| < epsilon$. Then $|b_{n_i} - b_{n_j}| = |a_{n_i} - a_{n_j} + 1/a_{n_i} - 1/a_{n_j}| < epsilon$. Suppose that $a_{n_i} = a_{n_j}$. Then clearly $|a_{n_i} - a_{n_j}| < epsilon$. Alternatively, suppose without loss of generality that $a_{n_i} > a_{n_j}$. Then $1/a_{n_i} - 1/a_{n_j} < 0$ while $a_{n_i} - a_{n_j} > 0$. It is straightforward to observe that $-(1/a_{n_i} - 1/a_{n_j}) le a_{n_i} - a_{n_j}$ because of the condition $a_n ge 0$, so it follows that $0 < |a_{n_i} - a_{n_j}| < |a_{n_i} - a_{n_j}|$, so then $|a_{n_i} - a_{n_j}| < |a_{n_i} - a_{n_j} + 1/a_{n_i} - 1/a_{n_j}| < epsilon$, hence ${a_n}$ is Cauchy and therefore converges.



      However, I am next asked to assume that ${b_n}$ converges but only that $a_n > 0$ and demonstrate, through construction of a counterexample, that it does not necessarily follow that ${a_n}$ converges. I am not entirely sure how to do this.










      share|cite|improve this question













      I am given a sequence ${a_n}$ with $a_n > 0$ and $b_n = a_n + 1/a_n$.



      I am first asked to assume that $a_n ge 1$ and show that the convergence of ${b_n}$ implies the convergence of ${a_n}$.



      My argument is:



      Since ${b_n}$ converges, ${b_n}$ is Cauchy, hence for every $epsilon > 0$ some $N$ such that for $n_i,n_j > N$, $|b_{n_i} - b_{n_j}| < epsilon$. Then $|b_{n_i} - b_{n_j}| = |a_{n_i} - a_{n_j} + 1/a_{n_i} - 1/a_{n_j}| < epsilon$. Suppose that $a_{n_i} = a_{n_j}$. Then clearly $|a_{n_i} - a_{n_j}| < epsilon$. Alternatively, suppose without loss of generality that $a_{n_i} > a_{n_j}$. Then $1/a_{n_i} - 1/a_{n_j} < 0$ while $a_{n_i} - a_{n_j} > 0$. It is straightforward to observe that $-(1/a_{n_i} - 1/a_{n_j}) le a_{n_i} - a_{n_j}$ because of the condition $a_n ge 0$, so it follows that $0 < |a_{n_i} - a_{n_j}| < |a_{n_i} - a_{n_j}|$, so then $|a_{n_i} - a_{n_j}| < |a_{n_i} - a_{n_j} + 1/a_{n_i} - 1/a_{n_j}| < epsilon$, hence ${a_n}$ is Cauchy and therefore converges.



      However, I am next asked to assume that ${b_n}$ converges but only that $a_n > 0$ and demonstrate, through construction of a counterexample, that it does not necessarily follow that ${a_n}$ converges. I am not entirely sure how to do this.







      real-analysis






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Oct 19 '14 at 23:33









      Elizabeth Lin

      815613




      815613






















          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1














          Hint: draw a graph of the function $f(x)= x + frac{1}{x}, x>0$, what are solutions of $f(x) = b$? with $b = dfrac{5}{2}$ for example






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • Oh, I think I see--is it correct to say that $f(x) = f(1/x)$, so if I take one of the convergent sequences ${a_n}$ where $a_n ge 1$ and I change it so that every other term becomes $1/a_n$, that doesn't change ${b_n}$ but now ${a_n}$ doesn't converge?
            – Elizabeth Lin
            Oct 19 '14 at 23:46








          • 1




            @ElizabethLin Yeah you get it!
            – Petite Etincelle
            Oct 19 '14 at 23:47



















          1














          You are really overthinking the second part.



          Take the sequence $a_n = a, 1/a, a, 1/a, a, 1/a, ... $, then $b_n = a + 1/a$ and the sequence $b_n$ is convergent, but $a_n$ is not convergent unless a = 1.






          share|cite|improve this answer





























            0














            Let $$a_n=2+sqrt 3(-1)^n$$which is not convergent while $b_n=4$ is convergent to $4$.






            share|cite|improve this answer





















              Your Answer





              StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
              return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
              StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
              StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
              });
              });
              }, "mathjax-editing");

              StackExchange.ready(function() {
              var channelOptions = {
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "69"
              };
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
              createEditor();
              });
              }
              else {
              createEditor();
              }
              });

              function createEditor() {
              StackExchange.prepareEditor({
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: true,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: 10,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader: {
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              },
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              });


              }
              });














              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function () {
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f981687%2fconvergence-of-a-n-given-that-b-n-a-n-1-a-n-converges%23new-answer', 'question_page');
              }
              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              3 Answers
              3






              active

              oldest

              votes








              3 Answers
              3






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              1














              Hint: draw a graph of the function $f(x)= x + frac{1}{x}, x>0$, what are solutions of $f(x) = b$? with $b = dfrac{5}{2}$ for example






              share|cite|improve this answer





















              • Oh, I think I see--is it correct to say that $f(x) = f(1/x)$, so if I take one of the convergent sequences ${a_n}$ where $a_n ge 1$ and I change it so that every other term becomes $1/a_n$, that doesn't change ${b_n}$ but now ${a_n}$ doesn't converge?
                – Elizabeth Lin
                Oct 19 '14 at 23:46








              • 1




                @ElizabethLin Yeah you get it!
                – Petite Etincelle
                Oct 19 '14 at 23:47
















              1














              Hint: draw a graph of the function $f(x)= x + frac{1}{x}, x>0$, what are solutions of $f(x) = b$? with $b = dfrac{5}{2}$ for example






              share|cite|improve this answer





















              • Oh, I think I see--is it correct to say that $f(x) = f(1/x)$, so if I take one of the convergent sequences ${a_n}$ where $a_n ge 1$ and I change it so that every other term becomes $1/a_n$, that doesn't change ${b_n}$ but now ${a_n}$ doesn't converge?
                – Elizabeth Lin
                Oct 19 '14 at 23:46








              • 1




                @ElizabethLin Yeah you get it!
                – Petite Etincelle
                Oct 19 '14 at 23:47














              1












              1








              1






              Hint: draw a graph of the function $f(x)= x + frac{1}{x}, x>0$, what are solutions of $f(x) = b$? with $b = dfrac{5}{2}$ for example






              share|cite|improve this answer












              Hint: draw a graph of the function $f(x)= x + frac{1}{x}, x>0$, what are solutions of $f(x) = b$? with $b = dfrac{5}{2}$ for example







              share|cite|improve this answer












              share|cite|improve this answer



              share|cite|improve this answer










              answered Oct 19 '14 at 23:37









              Petite Etincelle

              12.3k12147




              12.3k12147












              • Oh, I think I see--is it correct to say that $f(x) = f(1/x)$, so if I take one of the convergent sequences ${a_n}$ where $a_n ge 1$ and I change it so that every other term becomes $1/a_n$, that doesn't change ${b_n}$ but now ${a_n}$ doesn't converge?
                – Elizabeth Lin
                Oct 19 '14 at 23:46








              • 1




                @ElizabethLin Yeah you get it!
                – Petite Etincelle
                Oct 19 '14 at 23:47


















              • Oh, I think I see--is it correct to say that $f(x) = f(1/x)$, so if I take one of the convergent sequences ${a_n}$ where $a_n ge 1$ and I change it so that every other term becomes $1/a_n$, that doesn't change ${b_n}$ but now ${a_n}$ doesn't converge?
                – Elizabeth Lin
                Oct 19 '14 at 23:46








              • 1




                @ElizabethLin Yeah you get it!
                – Petite Etincelle
                Oct 19 '14 at 23:47
















              Oh, I think I see--is it correct to say that $f(x) = f(1/x)$, so if I take one of the convergent sequences ${a_n}$ where $a_n ge 1$ and I change it so that every other term becomes $1/a_n$, that doesn't change ${b_n}$ but now ${a_n}$ doesn't converge?
              – Elizabeth Lin
              Oct 19 '14 at 23:46






              Oh, I think I see--is it correct to say that $f(x) = f(1/x)$, so if I take one of the convergent sequences ${a_n}$ where $a_n ge 1$ and I change it so that every other term becomes $1/a_n$, that doesn't change ${b_n}$ but now ${a_n}$ doesn't converge?
              – Elizabeth Lin
              Oct 19 '14 at 23:46






              1




              1




              @ElizabethLin Yeah you get it!
              – Petite Etincelle
              Oct 19 '14 at 23:47




              @ElizabethLin Yeah you get it!
              – Petite Etincelle
              Oct 19 '14 at 23:47











              1














              You are really overthinking the second part.



              Take the sequence $a_n = a, 1/a, a, 1/a, a, 1/a, ... $, then $b_n = a + 1/a$ and the sequence $b_n$ is convergent, but $a_n$ is not convergent unless a = 1.






              share|cite|improve this answer


























                1














                You are really overthinking the second part.



                Take the sequence $a_n = a, 1/a, a, 1/a, a, 1/a, ... $, then $b_n = a + 1/a$ and the sequence $b_n$ is convergent, but $a_n$ is not convergent unless a = 1.






                share|cite|improve this answer
























                  1












                  1








                  1






                  You are really overthinking the second part.



                  Take the sequence $a_n = a, 1/a, a, 1/a, a, 1/a, ... $, then $b_n = a + 1/a$ and the sequence $b_n$ is convergent, but $a_n$ is not convergent unless a = 1.






                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  You are really overthinking the second part.



                  Take the sequence $a_n = a, 1/a, a, 1/a, a, 1/a, ... $, then $b_n = a + 1/a$ and the sequence $b_n$ is convergent, but $a_n$ is not convergent unless a = 1.







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered Oct 19 '14 at 23:58









                  gnasher729

                  5,9671028




                  5,9671028























                      0














                      Let $$a_n=2+sqrt 3(-1)^n$$which is not convergent while $b_n=4$ is convergent to $4$.






                      share|cite|improve this answer


























                        0














                        Let $$a_n=2+sqrt 3(-1)^n$$which is not convergent while $b_n=4$ is convergent to $4$.






                        share|cite|improve this answer
























                          0












                          0








                          0






                          Let $$a_n=2+sqrt 3(-1)^n$$which is not convergent while $b_n=4$ is convergent to $4$.






                          share|cite|improve this answer












                          Let $$a_n=2+sqrt 3(-1)^n$$which is not convergent while $b_n=4$ is convergent to $4$.







                          share|cite|improve this answer












                          share|cite|improve this answer



                          share|cite|improve this answer










                          answered Nov 27 '18 at 9:19









                          Mostafa Ayaz

                          13.7k3936




                          13.7k3936






























                              draft saved

                              draft discarded




















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid



                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                              Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                              Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                              Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid



                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function () {
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f981687%2fconvergence-of-a-n-given-that-b-n-a-n-1-a-n-converges%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                              }
                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              Quarter-circle Tiles

                              build a pushdown automaton that recognizes the reverse language of a given pushdown automaton?

                              Mont Emei