Does parametrizing a function of three independent variables reduce the function to one independent variable?












0












$begingroup$


For example, $f(x,y,z)= x^2 + 2y^2 + 3z^2$



Now, if we parametrize the independent variables $(x,y,z)$ in terms of $u$ and it happens to be $x=u, y=u-1, z=u+1$ (just an assumption), then the independent variables can now be related as;



$x=u,$



$y= u-1 = x-1 ⇒ 1 = x-y$



$z=u+1 ⇒ z = (x)+(x-y)= 2x-y = 2x-(x-1) = x+1 $



Is the function reduced to a one independent variable?
What am I missing that leads me to this confusion?
I am a beginner for multi variable calculus.



https://youtu.be/nIJQPX5kxp4?list=PLDesaqWTN6ESk16YRmzuJ8f6-rnuy0Ry7&t=1053 source of origin of confusion (17:32 to 20:28).










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$


    For example, $f(x,y,z)= x^2 + 2y^2 + 3z^2$



    Now, if we parametrize the independent variables $(x,y,z)$ in terms of $u$ and it happens to be $x=u, y=u-1, z=u+1$ (just an assumption), then the independent variables can now be related as;



    $x=u,$



    $y= u-1 = x-1 ⇒ 1 = x-y$



    $z=u+1 ⇒ z = (x)+(x-y)= 2x-y = 2x-(x-1) = x+1 $



    Is the function reduced to a one independent variable?
    What am I missing that leads me to this confusion?
    I am a beginner for multi variable calculus.



    https://youtu.be/nIJQPX5kxp4?list=PLDesaqWTN6ESk16YRmzuJ8f6-rnuy0Ry7&t=1053 source of origin of confusion (17:32 to 20:28).










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      For example, $f(x,y,z)= x^2 + 2y^2 + 3z^2$



      Now, if we parametrize the independent variables $(x,y,z)$ in terms of $u$ and it happens to be $x=u, y=u-1, z=u+1$ (just an assumption), then the independent variables can now be related as;



      $x=u,$



      $y= u-1 = x-1 ⇒ 1 = x-y$



      $z=u+1 ⇒ z = (x)+(x-y)= 2x-y = 2x-(x-1) = x+1 $



      Is the function reduced to a one independent variable?
      What am I missing that leads me to this confusion?
      I am a beginner for multi variable calculus.



      https://youtu.be/nIJQPX5kxp4?list=PLDesaqWTN6ESk16YRmzuJ8f6-rnuy0Ry7&t=1053 source of origin of confusion (17:32 to 20:28).










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      For example, $f(x,y,z)= x^2 + 2y^2 + 3z^2$



      Now, if we parametrize the independent variables $(x,y,z)$ in terms of $u$ and it happens to be $x=u, y=u-1, z=u+1$ (just an assumption), then the independent variables can now be related as;



      $x=u,$



      $y= u-1 = x-1 ⇒ 1 = x-y$



      $z=u+1 ⇒ z = (x)+(x-y)= 2x-y = 2x-(x-1) = x+1 $



      Is the function reduced to a one independent variable?
      What am I missing that leads me to this confusion?
      I am a beginner for multi variable calculus.



      https://youtu.be/nIJQPX5kxp4?list=PLDesaqWTN6ESk16YRmzuJ8f6-rnuy0Ry7&t=1053 source of origin of confusion (17:32 to 20:28).







      calculus multivariable-calculus parametrization change-of-variable






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Dec 2 '18 at 23:40







      Abbas Miya

















      asked Dec 2 '18 at 23:37









      Abbas MiyaAbbas Miya

      1338




      1338






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          It's not so much that the function is 'reduced' per say, it is still a function of three variables, it's just that you have isolated a subset of this function, and restricted your attention there. One way to understand what's going on here is to think of your function as a graph of a function in $mathbb{R}^4$. You've got three independent variables and one dependent variable. What you have done here is slice this graph by hypersurfaces in $y$ and $z$, since you set $u = x$.



          So the graph of the function is a $3D$ object living in $4D$ space, and you cut it with two other $3D$ objects. To understand what's going on here, think about what happens in the case of one dimension lower. If you have a surface graph in $mathbb{R}^3$, and you intersect it with another surface, in general, you will get a curve as their intersection. Here, intersecting two $3D$ objects in general will give a surface. Doing another such intersection gives you a curve.



          So the two further equations you are imposing, $y = x - 1$ and $z = x + 1$ can be thought of as 'cutting out' a curve in this $3D$ graph.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3023380%2fdoes-parametrizing-a-function-of-three-independent-variables-reduce-the-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            1












            $begingroup$

            It's not so much that the function is 'reduced' per say, it is still a function of three variables, it's just that you have isolated a subset of this function, and restricted your attention there. One way to understand what's going on here is to think of your function as a graph of a function in $mathbb{R}^4$. You've got three independent variables and one dependent variable. What you have done here is slice this graph by hypersurfaces in $y$ and $z$, since you set $u = x$.



            So the graph of the function is a $3D$ object living in $4D$ space, and you cut it with two other $3D$ objects. To understand what's going on here, think about what happens in the case of one dimension lower. If you have a surface graph in $mathbb{R}^3$, and you intersect it with another surface, in general, you will get a curve as their intersection. Here, intersecting two $3D$ objects in general will give a surface. Doing another such intersection gives you a curve.



            So the two further equations you are imposing, $y = x - 1$ and $z = x + 1$ can be thought of as 'cutting out' a curve in this $3D$ graph.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$


















              1












              $begingroup$

              It's not so much that the function is 'reduced' per say, it is still a function of three variables, it's just that you have isolated a subset of this function, and restricted your attention there. One way to understand what's going on here is to think of your function as a graph of a function in $mathbb{R}^4$. You've got three independent variables and one dependent variable. What you have done here is slice this graph by hypersurfaces in $y$ and $z$, since you set $u = x$.



              So the graph of the function is a $3D$ object living in $4D$ space, and you cut it with two other $3D$ objects. To understand what's going on here, think about what happens in the case of one dimension lower. If you have a surface graph in $mathbb{R}^3$, and you intersect it with another surface, in general, you will get a curve as their intersection. Here, intersecting two $3D$ objects in general will give a surface. Doing another such intersection gives you a curve.



              So the two further equations you are imposing, $y = x - 1$ and $z = x + 1$ can be thought of as 'cutting out' a curve in this $3D$ graph.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$
















                1












                1








                1





                $begingroup$

                It's not so much that the function is 'reduced' per say, it is still a function of three variables, it's just that you have isolated a subset of this function, and restricted your attention there. One way to understand what's going on here is to think of your function as a graph of a function in $mathbb{R}^4$. You've got three independent variables and one dependent variable. What you have done here is slice this graph by hypersurfaces in $y$ and $z$, since you set $u = x$.



                So the graph of the function is a $3D$ object living in $4D$ space, and you cut it with two other $3D$ objects. To understand what's going on here, think about what happens in the case of one dimension lower. If you have a surface graph in $mathbb{R}^3$, and you intersect it with another surface, in general, you will get a curve as their intersection. Here, intersecting two $3D$ objects in general will give a surface. Doing another such intersection gives you a curve.



                So the two further equations you are imposing, $y = x - 1$ and $z = x + 1$ can be thought of as 'cutting out' a curve in this $3D$ graph.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                It's not so much that the function is 'reduced' per say, it is still a function of three variables, it's just that you have isolated a subset of this function, and restricted your attention there. One way to understand what's going on here is to think of your function as a graph of a function in $mathbb{R}^4$. You've got three independent variables and one dependent variable. What you have done here is slice this graph by hypersurfaces in $y$ and $z$, since you set $u = x$.



                So the graph of the function is a $3D$ object living in $4D$ space, and you cut it with two other $3D$ objects. To understand what's going on here, think about what happens in the case of one dimension lower. If you have a surface graph in $mathbb{R}^3$, and you intersect it with another surface, in general, you will get a curve as their intersection. Here, intersecting two $3D$ objects in general will give a surface. Doing another such intersection gives you a curve.



                So the two further equations you are imposing, $y = x - 1$ and $z = x + 1$ can be thought of as 'cutting out' a curve in this $3D$ graph.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Dec 2 '18 at 23:49









                Alfred YergerAlfred Yerger

                10.3k2148




                10.3k2148






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3023380%2fdoes-parametrizing-a-function-of-three-independent-variables-reduce-the-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Ellipse (mathématiques)

                    Quarter-circle Tiles

                    Mont Emei