Presentation of (presumably) inner direct product $G_1times G_2$












0












$begingroup$


Let $G_1=langle S_1mid R_1rangle, G_2=langle S_2 mid R_2 rangle $ and $S_1cap S_2=emptyset$.



Show that $G_1times G_2=langle S_1cup S_2mid R_1cup R_2cup Rrangle$ where $R={S^{-1}T^{-1}ST=1}, Sin S_1, Tin S_2$.




Question:



Since $S_1cup S_2$ isn't a subgroup of the outer direct product, one should probably identify the outer with the inner product for given presentations. Is that correct? If yes, what are the factors of the inner product that is isomorphic to $G_1times G_2$? I would assume they are the smallest normal subgroups $N_1$ and $N_2$ containing $S_1$ and $S_2$.











share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    It seems you're talking about presentations of groups and it has nothing to do with representation theory.
    $endgroup$
    – Orat
    Jul 2 '17 at 20:15












  • $begingroup$
    You're right. I edited the tags.
    $endgroup$
    – user424862
    Jul 2 '17 at 20:25












  • $begingroup$
    Fixed all occurrences of "representation" as such.
    $endgroup$
    – Cameron Williams
    Jul 2 '17 at 20:27










  • $begingroup$
    Well, it is easy to see that there's an epimorphism $f:<S_1cup S_2>to G_1times G_2$ and that $R_1cup R_2cup Rsubsetker(f)$. The difficult part is to show that actually the kernel is generated by this set. Not sure yet how to do it.
    $endgroup$
    – freakish
    Jul 2 '17 at 21:04
















0












$begingroup$


Let $G_1=langle S_1mid R_1rangle, G_2=langle S_2 mid R_2 rangle $ and $S_1cap S_2=emptyset$.



Show that $G_1times G_2=langle S_1cup S_2mid R_1cup R_2cup Rrangle$ where $R={S^{-1}T^{-1}ST=1}, Sin S_1, Tin S_2$.




Question:



Since $S_1cup S_2$ isn't a subgroup of the outer direct product, one should probably identify the outer with the inner product for given presentations. Is that correct? If yes, what are the factors of the inner product that is isomorphic to $G_1times G_2$? I would assume they are the smallest normal subgroups $N_1$ and $N_2$ containing $S_1$ and $S_2$.











share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    It seems you're talking about presentations of groups and it has nothing to do with representation theory.
    $endgroup$
    – Orat
    Jul 2 '17 at 20:15












  • $begingroup$
    You're right. I edited the tags.
    $endgroup$
    – user424862
    Jul 2 '17 at 20:25












  • $begingroup$
    Fixed all occurrences of "representation" as such.
    $endgroup$
    – Cameron Williams
    Jul 2 '17 at 20:27










  • $begingroup$
    Well, it is easy to see that there's an epimorphism $f:<S_1cup S_2>to G_1times G_2$ and that $R_1cup R_2cup Rsubsetker(f)$. The difficult part is to show that actually the kernel is generated by this set. Not sure yet how to do it.
    $endgroup$
    – freakish
    Jul 2 '17 at 21:04














0












0








0





$begingroup$


Let $G_1=langle S_1mid R_1rangle, G_2=langle S_2 mid R_2 rangle $ and $S_1cap S_2=emptyset$.



Show that $G_1times G_2=langle S_1cup S_2mid R_1cup R_2cup Rrangle$ where $R={S^{-1}T^{-1}ST=1}, Sin S_1, Tin S_2$.




Question:



Since $S_1cup S_2$ isn't a subgroup of the outer direct product, one should probably identify the outer with the inner product for given presentations. Is that correct? If yes, what are the factors of the inner product that is isomorphic to $G_1times G_2$? I would assume they are the smallest normal subgroups $N_1$ and $N_2$ containing $S_1$ and $S_2$.











share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Let $G_1=langle S_1mid R_1rangle, G_2=langle S_2 mid R_2 rangle $ and $S_1cap S_2=emptyset$.



Show that $G_1times G_2=langle S_1cup S_2mid R_1cup R_2cup Rrangle$ where $R={S^{-1}T^{-1}ST=1}, Sin S_1, Tin S_2$.




Question:



Since $S_1cup S_2$ isn't a subgroup of the outer direct product, one should probably identify the outer with the inner product for given presentations. Is that correct? If yes, what are the factors of the inner product that is isomorphic to $G_1times G_2$? I would assume they are the smallest normal subgroups $N_1$ and $N_2$ containing $S_1$ and $S_2$.








abstract-algebra group-theory group-presentation direct-product






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 3 '18 at 0:54









Shaun

8,893113681




8,893113681










asked Jul 2 '17 at 17:06









user424862user424862

44027




44027








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    It seems you're talking about presentations of groups and it has nothing to do with representation theory.
    $endgroup$
    – Orat
    Jul 2 '17 at 20:15












  • $begingroup$
    You're right. I edited the tags.
    $endgroup$
    – user424862
    Jul 2 '17 at 20:25












  • $begingroup$
    Fixed all occurrences of "representation" as such.
    $endgroup$
    – Cameron Williams
    Jul 2 '17 at 20:27










  • $begingroup$
    Well, it is easy to see that there's an epimorphism $f:<S_1cup S_2>to G_1times G_2$ and that $R_1cup R_2cup Rsubsetker(f)$. The difficult part is to show that actually the kernel is generated by this set. Not sure yet how to do it.
    $endgroup$
    – freakish
    Jul 2 '17 at 21:04














  • 2




    $begingroup$
    It seems you're talking about presentations of groups and it has nothing to do with representation theory.
    $endgroup$
    – Orat
    Jul 2 '17 at 20:15












  • $begingroup$
    You're right. I edited the tags.
    $endgroup$
    – user424862
    Jul 2 '17 at 20:25












  • $begingroup$
    Fixed all occurrences of "representation" as such.
    $endgroup$
    – Cameron Williams
    Jul 2 '17 at 20:27










  • $begingroup$
    Well, it is easy to see that there's an epimorphism $f:<S_1cup S_2>to G_1times G_2$ and that $R_1cup R_2cup Rsubsetker(f)$. The difficult part is to show that actually the kernel is generated by this set. Not sure yet how to do it.
    $endgroup$
    – freakish
    Jul 2 '17 at 21:04








2




2




$begingroup$
It seems you're talking about presentations of groups and it has nothing to do with representation theory.
$endgroup$
– Orat
Jul 2 '17 at 20:15






$begingroup$
It seems you're talking about presentations of groups and it has nothing to do with representation theory.
$endgroup$
– Orat
Jul 2 '17 at 20:15














$begingroup$
You're right. I edited the tags.
$endgroup$
– user424862
Jul 2 '17 at 20:25






$begingroup$
You're right. I edited the tags.
$endgroup$
– user424862
Jul 2 '17 at 20:25














$begingroup$
Fixed all occurrences of "representation" as such.
$endgroup$
– Cameron Williams
Jul 2 '17 at 20:27




$begingroup$
Fixed all occurrences of "representation" as such.
$endgroup$
– Cameron Williams
Jul 2 '17 at 20:27












$begingroup$
Well, it is easy to see that there's an epimorphism $f:<S_1cup S_2>to G_1times G_2$ and that $R_1cup R_2cup Rsubsetker(f)$. The difficult part is to show that actually the kernel is generated by this set. Not sure yet how to do it.
$endgroup$
– freakish
Jul 2 '17 at 21:04




$begingroup$
Well, it is easy to see that there's an epimorphism $f:<S_1cup S_2>to G_1times G_2$ and that $R_1cup R_2cup Rsubsetker(f)$. The difficult part is to show that actually the kernel is generated by this set. Not sure yet how to do it.
$endgroup$
– freakish
Jul 2 '17 at 21:04










0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2344160%2fpresentation-of-presumably-inner-direct-product-g-1-times-g-2%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2344160%2fpresentation-of-presumably-inner-direct-product-g-1-times-g-2%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Quarter-circle Tiles

build a pushdown automaton that recognizes the reverse language of a given pushdown automaton?

Mont Emei