Showing that simple random walks on two graphs have the same type












0












$begingroup$


Question




Let $G$ be a connected infinite graph of bounded degree (which means that there exists $K>0$ such that $text{deg}(v)leq K$ for all vertices $v$ in G). Let $G_k$ be the graph obtained from $G$ by adding an edge $xy$ if it is possible to go from $x$ to $y$ in at most $k$ steps. Using electric network arguments show that simple random walk on $G_k$ is recurrent iff simple random walk on $G$ is recurrent (i.e. both random walks have the same type)




The above problem is from "Random Walks and Electric Networks" by Doyle and Snell.



My attempt



I believe I have been able to show one direction. Namely, suppose that $G$ is transient. Since $G$ can be embedded in $G_k$, by Raleigh's monotonicity law, it is the case that
$$
R_{text{Eff}}(G_k)leq R_{text{Eff}}(G)<infty
$$

where $R_{text{Eff}}$ is the effective resistance. Since $G$ is transient, $ R_{text{Eff}}(G)<infty$ and hence so is $G_k$.



For the converse, I am trying to show that if $G_k$ is transient then so is $G$. I tried to use the result that states that $G$ is transient iff there exists a unit flow from a vertex $v$ to infinity with finite energy. To this end, starting with such a flow in $G_k$, I tried to manipulate the flow in $G_k$ to get the flow in $G$ but I don't know what to do with the flow on the "short-cut" edges of $G_k$. Any help is appreciated.



Methods not involving electrical networks are okay too but electrical network methods are preferred.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$


    Question




    Let $G$ be a connected infinite graph of bounded degree (which means that there exists $K>0$ such that $text{deg}(v)leq K$ for all vertices $v$ in G). Let $G_k$ be the graph obtained from $G$ by adding an edge $xy$ if it is possible to go from $x$ to $y$ in at most $k$ steps. Using electric network arguments show that simple random walk on $G_k$ is recurrent iff simple random walk on $G$ is recurrent (i.e. both random walks have the same type)




    The above problem is from "Random Walks and Electric Networks" by Doyle and Snell.



    My attempt



    I believe I have been able to show one direction. Namely, suppose that $G$ is transient. Since $G$ can be embedded in $G_k$, by Raleigh's monotonicity law, it is the case that
    $$
    R_{text{Eff}}(G_k)leq R_{text{Eff}}(G)<infty
    $$

    where $R_{text{Eff}}$ is the effective resistance. Since $G$ is transient, $ R_{text{Eff}}(G)<infty$ and hence so is $G_k$.



    For the converse, I am trying to show that if $G_k$ is transient then so is $G$. I tried to use the result that states that $G$ is transient iff there exists a unit flow from a vertex $v$ to infinity with finite energy. To this end, starting with such a flow in $G_k$, I tried to manipulate the flow in $G_k$ to get the flow in $G$ but I don't know what to do with the flow on the "short-cut" edges of $G_k$. Any help is appreciated.



    Methods not involving electrical networks are okay too but electrical network methods are preferred.










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      Question




      Let $G$ be a connected infinite graph of bounded degree (which means that there exists $K>0$ such that $text{deg}(v)leq K$ for all vertices $v$ in G). Let $G_k$ be the graph obtained from $G$ by adding an edge $xy$ if it is possible to go from $x$ to $y$ in at most $k$ steps. Using electric network arguments show that simple random walk on $G_k$ is recurrent iff simple random walk on $G$ is recurrent (i.e. both random walks have the same type)




      The above problem is from "Random Walks and Electric Networks" by Doyle and Snell.



      My attempt



      I believe I have been able to show one direction. Namely, suppose that $G$ is transient. Since $G$ can be embedded in $G_k$, by Raleigh's monotonicity law, it is the case that
      $$
      R_{text{Eff}}(G_k)leq R_{text{Eff}}(G)<infty
      $$

      where $R_{text{Eff}}$ is the effective resistance. Since $G$ is transient, $ R_{text{Eff}}(G)<infty$ and hence so is $G_k$.



      For the converse, I am trying to show that if $G_k$ is transient then so is $G$. I tried to use the result that states that $G$ is transient iff there exists a unit flow from a vertex $v$ to infinity with finite energy. To this end, starting with such a flow in $G_k$, I tried to manipulate the flow in $G_k$ to get the flow in $G$ but I don't know what to do with the flow on the "short-cut" edges of $G_k$. Any help is appreciated.



      Methods not involving electrical networks are okay too but electrical network methods are preferred.










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      Question




      Let $G$ be a connected infinite graph of bounded degree (which means that there exists $K>0$ such that $text{deg}(v)leq K$ for all vertices $v$ in G). Let $G_k$ be the graph obtained from $G$ by adding an edge $xy$ if it is possible to go from $x$ to $y$ in at most $k$ steps. Using electric network arguments show that simple random walk on $G_k$ is recurrent iff simple random walk on $G$ is recurrent (i.e. both random walks have the same type)




      The above problem is from "Random Walks and Electric Networks" by Doyle and Snell.



      My attempt



      I believe I have been able to show one direction. Namely, suppose that $G$ is transient. Since $G$ can be embedded in $G_k$, by Raleigh's monotonicity law, it is the case that
      $$
      R_{text{Eff}}(G_k)leq R_{text{Eff}}(G)<infty
      $$

      where $R_{text{Eff}}$ is the effective resistance. Since $G$ is transient, $ R_{text{Eff}}(G)<infty$ and hence so is $G_k$.



      For the converse, I am trying to show that if $G_k$ is transient then so is $G$. I tried to use the result that states that $G$ is transient iff there exists a unit flow from a vertex $v$ to infinity with finite energy. To this end, starting with such a flow in $G_k$, I tried to manipulate the flow in $G_k$ to get the flow in $G$ but I don't know what to do with the flow on the "short-cut" edges of $G_k$. Any help is appreciated.



      Methods not involving electrical networks are okay too but electrical network methods are preferred.







      probability probability-theory markov-chains random-walk network-flow






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Dec 4 '18 at 1:54









      Foobaz JohnFoobaz John

      21.8k41352




      21.8k41352






















          0






          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3025020%2fshowing-that-simple-random-walks-on-two-graphs-have-the-same-type%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          0






          active

          oldest

          votes








          0






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes
















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3025020%2fshowing-that-simple-random-walks-on-two-graphs-have-the-same-type%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Quarter-circle Tiles

          build a pushdown automaton that recognizes the reverse language of a given pushdown automaton?

          Mont Emei