Zeta like function summing over Gaussian integers in the first quadrant












2












$begingroup$


Let $x$ be a real number and let



$$f(x)=sum_{ z = re^{theta i} inmathbb{Z}[i] \ r le x \ 0le theta le pi/2}frac{1}{z^s}$$




Is it possible to compute in (terms of the $zeta$ function perhaps) $$xi
(s)=lim_{xtoinfty} f_s(x)$$




It looks just by toying around that $xi(2)$ is divergent. Does $xi$ converge for larger $s$?



Here's some empirical evidence that $xi(2)$ diverges.



Let $tau(n) : mathbb{N} to mathbb{N}[i]$ be a pairing function and let $tau(n)=x_n+y_ni$.



We are looking for $frac{1}{tau(n)^2}=frac{1}{(x_n+y_ni)^2}= frac{(x_n-y_ni)^2}{(x_n^2+y_n^2)^2}= frac{x_n^2-2x_ny_ni-y_n^2}{(x_n^2+y_n^2)^2}=frac{x_n^2-y_n^2}{(x_n^2+y_n^2)^2}+ifrac{2x_ny_n}{{(x_n^2+y_n^2)^2}}$



We have then $$sum_{ }frac{1}{z^2} =sum_{n=1 \ x+yi=tau(n)}^inftyfrac{x^2-y^2}{(x^2+y^2)^2}+2isum_{n=1 \ x+yi=tau(n)}^inftyfrac{xy}{(x^2+y^2)^2}$$
By numerical methods it seems to me that the sum diverges.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    I like to use $mathbb{N}[i]$ for the Gaussian integers with real and imaginary parts non-negative.
    $endgroup$
    – Mason
    Dec 4 '18 at 0:35






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    No to your first question. Do you know Hecke L-functions ? For example $L(s,psi^n)$ with $psi(a+ib) = frac{a+ib}{a-ib}$, for $n$ even it is a Hecke character depending only on the embeddings $mathbb{Z}[i] to mathbb{C}$ and not on the quotient rings $mathbb{Z}[i]/(n)$. We need to sum over all the $L(s,psi^n),n in mathbb{Z}$ to obtain the completely multiplicative function $f(a+ib) = i^m$ if $arg(i^{-m} (a+ib)) in [0,pi/2)$
    $endgroup$
    – reuns
    Dec 4 '18 at 0:58












  • $begingroup$
    I don't know about Hecke L-functions. But I guess I'll do some reading
    $endgroup$
    – Mason
    Dec 4 '18 at 1:02










  • $begingroup$
    Oops of course $f$ isn't multiplicative. But summing over all the $L(s,psi^n)$ make it appear.
    $endgroup$
    – reuns
    Dec 4 '18 at 1:07
















2












$begingroup$


Let $x$ be a real number and let



$$f(x)=sum_{ z = re^{theta i} inmathbb{Z}[i] \ r le x \ 0le theta le pi/2}frac{1}{z^s}$$




Is it possible to compute in (terms of the $zeta$ function perhaps) $$xi
(s)=lim_{xtoinfty} f_s(x)$$




It looks just by toying around that $xi(2)$ is divergent. Does $xi$ converge for larger $s$?



Here's some empirical evidence that $xi(2)$ diverges.



Let $tau(n) : mathbb{N} to mathbb{N}[i]$ be a pairing function and let $tau(n)=x_n+y_ni$.



We are looking for $frac{1}{tau(n)^2}=frac{1}{(x_n+y_ni)^2}= frac{(x_n-y_ni)^2}{(x_n^2+y_n^2)^2}= frac{x_n^2-2x_ny_ni-y_n^2}{(x_n^2+y_n^2)^2}=frac{x_n^2-y_n^2}{(x_n^2+y_n^2)^2}+ifrac{2x_ny_n}{{(x_n^2+y_n^2)^2}}$



We have then $$sum_{ }frac{1}{z^2} =sum_{n=1 \ x+yi=tau(n)}^inftyfrac{x^2-y^2}{(x^2+y^2)^2}+2isum_{n=1 \ x+yi=tau(n)}^inftyfrac{xy}{(x^2+y^2)^2}$$
By numerical methods it seems to me that the sum diverges.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    I like to use $mathbb{N}[i]$ for the Gaussian integers with real and imaginary parts non-negative.
    $endgroup$
    – Mason
    Dec 4 '18 at 0:35






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    No to your first question. Do you know Hecke L-functions ? For example $L(s,psi^n)$ with $psi(a+ib) = frac{a+ib}{a-ib}$, for $n$ even it is a Hecke character depending only on the embeddings $mathbb{Z}[i] to mathbb{C}$ and not on the quotient rings $mathbb{Z}[i]/(n)$. We need to sum over all the $L(s,psi^n),n in mathbb{Z}$ to obtain the completely multiplicative function $f(a+ib) = i^m$ if $arg(i^{-m} (a+ib)) in [0,pi/2)$
    $endgroup$
    – reuns
    Dec 4 '18 at 0:58












  • $begingroup$
    I don't know about Hecke L-functions. But I guess I'll do some reading
    $endgroup$
    – Mason
    Dec 4 '18 at 1:02










  • $begingroup$
    Oops of course $f$ isn't multiplicative. But summing over all the $L(s,psi^n)$ make it appear.
    $endgroup$
    – reuns
    Dec 4 '18 at 1:07














2












2








2





$begingroup$


Let $x$ be a real number and let



$$f(x)=sum_{ z = re^{theta i} inmathbb{Z}[i] \ r le x \ 0le theta le pi/2}frac{1}{z^s}$$




Is it possible to compute in (terms of the $zeta$ function perhaps) $$xi
(s)=lim_{xtoinfty} f_s(x)$$




It looks just by toying around that $xi(2)$ is divergent. Does $xi$ converge for larger $s$?



Here's some empirical evidence that $xi(2)$ diverges.



Let $tau(n) : mathbb{N} to mathbb{N}[i]$ be a pairing function and let $tau(n)=x_n+y_ni$.



We are looking for $frac{1}{tau(n)^2}=frac{1}{(x_n+y_ni)^2}= frac{(x_n-y_ni)^2}{(x_n^2+y_n^2)^2}= frac{x_n^2-2x_ny_ni-y_n^2}{(x_n^2+y_n^2)^2}=frac{x_n^2-y_n^2}{(x_n^2+y_n^2)^2}+ifrac{2x_ny_n}{{(x_n^2+y_n^2)^2}}$



We have then $$sum_{ }frac{1}{z^2} =sum_{n=1 \ x+yi=tau(n)}^inftyfrac{x^2-y^2}{(x^2+y^2)^2}+2isum_{n=1 \ x+yi=tau(n)}^inftyfrac{xy}{(x^2+y^2)^2}$$
By numerical methods it seems to me that the sum diverges.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




Let $x$ be a real number and let



$$f(x)=sum_{ z = re^{theta i} inmathbb{Z}[i] \ r le x \ 0le theta le pi/2}frac{1}{z^s}$$




Is it possible to compute in (terms of the $zeta$ function perhaps) $$xi
(s)=lim_{xtoinfty} f_s(x)$$




It looks just by toying around that $xi(2)$ is divergent. Does $xi$ converge for larger $s$?



Here's some empirical evidence that $xi(2)$ diverges.



Let $tau(n) : mathbb{N} to mathbb{N}[i]$ be a pairing function and let $tau(n)=x_n+y_ni$.



We are looking for $frac{1}{tau(n)^2}=frac{1}{(x_n+y_ni)^2}= frac{(x_n-y_ni)^2}{(x_n^2+y_n^2)^2}= frac{x_n^2-2x_ny_ni-y_n^2}{(x_n^2+y_n^2)^2}=frac{x_n^2-y_n^2}{(x_n^2+y_n^2)^2}+ifrac{2x_ny_n}{{(x_n^2+y_n^2)^2}}$



We have then $$sum_{ }frac{1}{z^2} =sum_{n=1 \ x+yi=tau(n)}^inftyfrac{x^2-y^2}{(x^2+y^2)^2}+2isum_{n=1 \ x+yi=tau(n)}^inftyfrac{xy}{(x^2+y^2)^2}$$
By numerical methods it seems to me that the sum diverges.







zeta-functions






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Dec 4 '18 at 0:35









MasonMason

1,9551530




1,9551530












  • $begingroup$
    I like to use $mathbb{N}[i]$ for the Gaussian integers with real and imaginary parts non-negative.
    $endgroup$
    – Mason
    Dec 4 '18 at 0:35






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    No to your first question. Do you know Hecke L-functions ? For example $L(s,psi^n)$ with $psi(a+ib) = frac{a+ib}{a-ib}$, for $n$ even it is a Hecke character depending only on the embeddings $mathbb{Z}[i] to mathbb{C}$ and not on the quotient rings $mathbb{Z}[i]/(n)$. We need to sum over all the $L(s,psi^n),n in mathbb{Z}$ to obtain the completely multiplicative function $f(a+ib) = i^m$ if $arg(i^{-m} (a+ib)) in [0,pi/2)$
    $endgroup$
    – reuns
    Dec 4 '18 at 0:58












  • $begingroup$
    I don't know about Hecke L-functions. But I guess I'll do some reading
    $endgroup$
    – Mason
    Dec 4 '18 at 1:02










  • $begingroup$
    Oops of course $f$ isn't multiplicative. But summing over all the $L(s,psi^n)$ make it appear.
    $endgroup$
    – reuns
    Dec 4 '18 at 1:07


















  • $begingroup$
    I like to use $mathbb{N}[i]$ for the Gaussian integers with real and imaginary parts non-negative.
    $endgroup$
    – Mason
    Dec 4 '18 at 0:35






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    No to your first question. Do you know Hecke L-functions ? For example $L(s,psi^n)$ with $psi(a+ib) = frac{a+ib}{a-ib}$, for $n$ even it is a Hecke character depending only on the embeddings $mathbb{Z}[i] to mathbb{C}$ and not on the quotient rings $mathbb{Z}[i]/(n)$. We need to sum over all the $L(s,psi^n),n in mathbb{Z}$ to obtain the completely multiplicative function $f(a+ib) = i^m$ if $arg(i^{-m} (a+ib)) in [0,pi/2)$
    $endgroup$
    – reuns
    Dec 4 '18 at 0:58












  • $begingroup$
    I don't know about Hecke L-functions. But I guess I'll do some reading
    $endgroup$
    – Mason
    Dec 4 '18 at 1:02










  • $begingroup$
    Oops of course $f$ isn't multiplicative. But summing over all the $L(s,psi^n)$ make it appear.
    $endgroup$
    – reuns
    Dec 4 '18 at 1:07
















$begingroup$
I like to use $mathbb{N}[i]$ for the Gaussian integers with real and imaginary parts non-negative.
$endgroup$
– Mason
Dec 4 '18 at 0:35




$begingroup$
I like to use $mathbb{N}[i]$ for the Gaussian integers with real and imaginary parts non-negative.
$endgroup$
– Mason
Dec 4 '18 at 0:35




1




1




$begingroup$
No to your first question. Do you know Hecke L-functions ? For example $L(s,psi^n)$ with $psi(a+ib) = frac{a+ib}{a-ib}$, for $n$ even it is a Hecke character depending only on the embeddings $mathbb{Z}[i] to mathbb{C}$ and not on the quotient rings $mathbb{Z}[i]/(n)$. We need to sum over all the $L(s,psi^n),n in mathbb{Z}$ to obtain the completely multiplicative function $f(a+ib) = i^m$ if $arg(i^{-m} (a+ib)) in [0,pi/2)$
$endgroup$
– reuns
Dec 4 '18 at 0:58






$begingroup$
No to your first question. Do you know Hecke L-functions ? For example $L(s,psi^n)$ with $psi(a+ib) = frac{a+ib}{a-ib}$, for $n$ even it is a Hecke character depending only on the embeddings $mathbb{Z}[i] to mathbb{C}$ and not on the quotient rings $mathbb{Z}[i]/(n)$. We need to sum over all the $L(s,psi^n),n in mathbb{Z}$ to obtain the completely multiplicative function $f(a+ib) = i^m$ if $arg(i^{-m} (a+ib)) in [0,pi/2)$
$endgroup$
– reuns
Dec 4 '18 at 0:58














$begingroup$
I don't know about Hecke L-functions. But I guess I'll do some reading
$endgroup$
– Mason
Dec 4 '18 at 1:02




$begingroup$
I don't know about Hecke L-functions. But I guess I'll do some reading
$endgroup$
– Mason
Dec 4 '18 at 1:02












$begingroup$
Oops of course $f$ isn't multiplicative. But summing over all the $L(s,psi^n)$ make it appear.
$endgroup$
– reuns
Dec 4 '18 at 1:07




$begingroup$
Oops of course $f$ isn't multiplicative. But summing over all the $L(s,psi^n)$ make it appear.
$endgroup$
– reuns
Dec 4 '18 at 1:07










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0












$begingroup$

Yes, $xi(2)$ diverges. Note that for $z$ in this quadrant, $-text{Im}(1/z^2) ge 0$. So $-text{Im} sum_{z in mathbb N[i]: 0 < |z| < r} 1/z^2$ can be approximated by
$$int_1^r drho int_0^{pi/2} dtheta; r frac{cos(theta)}{r^2}
sim {text {const}} cdot log(r)$$
(essentially the sum is a two-dimensional Riemann sum for the integral).






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    I, of course, appreciate this answer and will see whether I can use it to answer the question that I proposed but I should just comment that I am not accepting as the answer because it doesn't address my question which was: Does $xi$ converge for $s>2$
    $endgroup$
    – Mason
    Dec 8 '18 at 16:17











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3024940%2fzeta-like-function-summing-over-gaussian-integers-in-the-first-quadrant%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









0












$begingroup$

Yes, $xi(2)$ diverges. Note that for $z$ in this quadrant, $-text{Im}(1/z^2) ge 0$. So $-text{Im} sum_{z in mathbb N[i]: 0 < |z| < r} 1/z^2$ can be approximated by
$$int_1^r drho int_0^{pi/2} dtheta; r frac{cos(theta)}{r^2}
sim {text {const}} cdot log(r)$$
(essentially the sum is a two-dimensional Riemann sum for the integral).






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    I, of course, appreciate this answer and will see whether I can use it to answer the question that I proposed but I should just comment that I am not accepting as the answer because it doesn't address my question which was: Does $xi$ converge for $s>2$
    $endgroup$
    – Mason
    Dec 8 '18 at 16:17
















0












$begingroup$

Yes, $xi(2)$ diverges. Note that for $z$ in this quadrant, $-text{Im}(1/z^2) ge 0$. So $-text{Im} sum_{z in mathbb N[i]: 0 < |z| < r} 1/z^2$ can be approximated by
$$int_1^r drho int_0^{pi/2} dtheta; r frac{cos(theta)}{r^2}
sim {text {const}} cdot log(r)$$
(essentially the sum is a two-dimensional Riemann sum for the integral).






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    I, of course, appreciate this answer and will see whether I can use it to answer the question that I proposed but I should just comment that I am not accepting as the answer because it doesn't address my question which was: Does $xi$ converge for $s>2$
    $endgroup$
    – Mason
    Dec 8 '18 at 16:17














0












0








0





$begingroup$

Yes, $xi(2)$ diverges. Note that for $z$ in this quadrant, $-text{Im}(1/z^2) ge 0$. So $-text{Im} sum_{z in mathbb N[i]: 0 < |z| < r} 1/z^2$ can be approximated by
$$int_1^r drho int_0^{pi/2} dtheta; r frac{cos(theta)}{r^2}
sim {text {const}} cdot log(r)$$
(essentially the sum is a two-dimensional Riemann sum for the integral).






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



Yes, $xi(2)$ diverges. Note that for $z$ in this quadrant, $-text{Im}(1/z^2) ge 0$. So $-text{Im} sum_{z in mathbb N[i]: 0 < |z| < r} 1/z^2$ can be approximated by
$$int_1^r drho int_0^{pi/2} dtheta; r frac{cos(theta)}{r^2}
sim {text {const}} cdot log(r)$$
(essentially the sum is a two-dimensional Riemann sum for the integral).







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Dec 4 '18 at 4:13









Robert IsraelRobert Israel

320k23210462




320k23210462












  • $begingroup$
    I, of course, appreciate this answer and will see whether I can use it to answer the question that I proposed but I should just comment that I am not accepting as the answer because it doesn't address my question which was: Does $xi$ converge for $s>2$
    $endgroup$
    – Mason
    Dec 8 '18 at 16:17


















  • $begingroup$
    I, of course, appreciate this answer and will see whether I can use it to answer the question that I proposed but I should just comment that I am not accepting as the answer because it doesn't address my question which was: Does $xi$ converge for $s>2$
    $endgroup$
    – Mason
    Dec 8 '18 at 16:17
















$begingroup$
I, of course, appreciate this answer and will see whether I can use it to answer the question that I proposed but I should just comment that I am not accepting as the answer because it doesn't address my question which was: Does $xi$ converge for $s>2$
$endgroup$
– Mason
Dec 8 '18 at 16:17




$begingroup$
I, of course, appreciate this answer and will see whether I can use it to answer the question that I proposed but I should just comment that I am not accepting as the answer because it doesn't address my question which was: Does $xi$ converge for $s>2$
$endgroup$
– Mason
Dec 8 '18 at 16:17


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3024940%2fzeta-like-function-summing-over-gaussian-integers-in-the-first-quadrant%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Ellipse (mathématiques)

Quarter-circle Tiles

Mont Emei