Image of base change of immersion
$begingroup$
I'm revising for my exams now and struggling with the following exercise:
Let $f: X to S$ be an open or closed immersion and $g: S' to S$ another morphism where $X,S,S'$ are schemes. Then the base-change morphism $f' : X times_S S' to S'$ is such that $text{Im}(f') = g^{-1}(text{Im}(f))$.
If anyone could prove this for me I'd be really grateful!
algebraic-geometry schemes
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'm revising for my exams now and struggling with the following exercise:
Let $f: X to S$ be an open or closed immersion and $g: S' to S$ another morphism where $X,S,S'$ are schemes. Then the base-change morphism $f' : X times_S S' to S'$ is such that $text{Im}(f') = g^{-1}(text{Im}(f))$.
If anyone could prove this for me I'd be really grateful!
algebraic-geometry schemes
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Is $operatorname{Im}$ the scheme-theoretic or set-theoretic image?
$endgroup$
– Hoot
May 27 '16 at 18:04
$begingroup$
Scheme-theoretic, I think...
$endgroup$
– CameronJWhitehead
May 27 '16 at 19:30
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'm revising for my exams now and struggling with the following exercise:
Let $f: X to S$ be an open or closed immersion and $g: S' to S$ another morphism where $X,S,S'$ are schemes. Then the base-change morphism $f' : X times_S S' to S'$ is such that $text{Im}(f') = g^{-1}(text{Im}(f))$.
If anyone could prove this for me I'd be really grateful!
algebraic-geometry schemes
$endgroup$
I'm revising for my exams now and struggling with the following exercise:
Let $f: X to S$ be an open or closed immersion and $g: S' to S$ another morphism where $X,S,S'$ are schemes. Then the base-change morphism $f' : X times_S S' to S'$ is such that $text{Im}(f') = g^{-1}(text{Im}(f))$.
If anyone could prove this for me I'd be really grateful!
algebraic-geometry schemes
algebraic-geometry schemes
asked May 27 '16 at 16:35
CameronJWhiteheadCameronJWhitehead
1,436518
1,436518
$begingroup$
Is $operatorname{Im}$ the scheme-theoretic or set-theoretic image?
$endgroup$
– Hoot
May 27 '16 at 18:04
$begingroup$
Scheme-theoretic, I think...
$endgroup$
– CameronJWhitehead
May 27 '16 at 19:30
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Is $operatorname{Im}$ the scheme-theoretic or set-theoretic image?
$endgroup$
– Hoot
May 27 '16 at 18:04
$begingroup$
Scheme-theoretic, I think...
$endgroup$
– CameronJWhitehead
May 27 '16 at 19:30
$begingroup$
Is $operatorname{Im}$ the scheme-theoretic or set-theoretic image?
$endgroup$
– Hoot
May 27 '16 at 18:04
$begingroup$
Is $operatorname{Im}$ the scheme-theoretic or set-theoretic image?
$endgroup$
– Hoot
May 27 '16 at 18:04
$begingroup$
Scheme-theoretic, I think...
$endgroup$
– CameronJWhitehead
May 27 '16 at 19:30
$begingroup$
Scheme-theoretic, I think...
$endgroup$
– CameronJWhitehead
May 27 '16 at 19:30
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
In this answer, $X$(resp. $Xotimes_S S'$), and $mathrm{Im} f$(resp. $mathrm{Im} f'$) are identified. (This is not problematic at all, especially about $Xotimes_S S'$, and $mathrm{Im} f'$, thanks to the following fact. This is a standard result in algebraic geometry, and I think you have proved it in class. However, if you do not know it, please see Section 7.3, Proposition 13 of S. Bosch, Algebraic Geometry and Commutative Algebra, Springer, 2013 for a proof.)
Fact $f'$ is an open (resp. closed) immersion if $f$ is an open (resp. closed) immersion.
When $f$ is an open immersion, it is clear from the pull-back diagram
$$
begin{array}{ccccccccc}
g^{-1}(X)& xrightarrow{f'} & S' \
downarrow& & downarrow{g} \
X& xrightarrow{f} & S,
end{array}
$$
which owes to the universal property of open immersion.
Prop (The Universal Property of Open Immersion)
If $f:Xto Y$ is a morphism between schemes, $Vsubseteq Y$ an open subset(, or subscheme), and $f(X)subseteq V$, then there exists a unique morphism $f':Xto V$ whose composition with the open immersion $Vto X$ is $f$.
Proof You can do it through looking at the structure sheaf of V, etc.
When $f$ is a closed immersion, first assume that $S$, and $S'$(, and so $X$) are affine schemes. Let $S = mathrm{Spec} A, X = mathrm{Spec} A/mathfrak{a}$, and $S' = mathrm{Spec} B$. Then, $Xtimes_S S'=mathrm{Spec} A/mathfrak{a}otimes_A B=mathrm{Spec} B/mathfrak{a}B = V(mathfrak{a}B) = g^{-1}(V(mathfrak{a})) = g^{-1}(X)$. For the second last equality, if $phi: Ato B$ is the corresponding homomorphism between rings to $g$, then $mathfrak{q}in g^{-1}(V(mathfrak{a}))Leftrightarrow phi^{-1}(mathfrak{p})in V(mathfrak{a})Leftrightarrow phi^{-1}(mathfrak{p})supseteqmathfrak{a}Leftrightarrowmathfrak{p}supseteqphi(mathfrak{a})(=mathfrak{a}B)Leftrightarrow mathfrak{p}in V(mathfrak{a}B)$.
In the general case, take an affine open covering $S = cup_{jin J} V_j$, and for each $jin J$, $g^{-1}(V_j) = cup_{iin I_j} U_{i,j}$. Let $g_{i,j}:U_{i,j}to V_j$, and $g_{j}:g^{-1}(V_j)to V_j$ be the restriction of f. Then, $Xtimes_S S' = cup_{jin J}cup_{iin I_j} f^{-1}(V_j)times_{V_j} U_{i,j} = cupcup g_{i,j}^{-1} (V_j) = cup g_{j}^{-1} (V_j) = g^{-1}(V)$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1802351%2fimage-of-base-change-of-immersion%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
In this answer, $X$(resp. $Xotimes_S S'$), and $mathrm{Im} f$(resp. $mathrm{Im} f'$) are identified. (This is not problematic at all, especially about $Xotimes_S S'$, and $mathrm{Im} f'$, thanks to the following fact. This is a standard result in algebraic geometry, and I think you have proved it in class. However, if you do not know it, please see Section 7.3, Proposition 13 of S. Bosch, Algebraic Geometry and Commutative Algebra, Springer, 2013 for a proof.)
Fact $f'$ is an open (resp. closed) immersion if $f$ is an open (resp. closed) immersion.
When $f$ is an open immersion, it is clear from the pull-back diagram
$$
begin{array}{ccccccccc}
g^{-1}(X)& xrightarrow{f'} & S' \
downarrow& & downarrow{g} \
X& xrightarrow{f} & S,
end{array}
$$
which owes to the universal property of open immersion.
Prop (The Universal Property of Open Immersion)
If $f:Xto Y$ is a morphism between schemes, $Vsubseteq Y$ an open subset(, or subscheme), and $f(X)subseteq V$, then there exists a unique morphism $f':Xto V$ whose composition with the open immersion $Vto X$ is $f$.
Proof You can do it through looking at the structure sheaf of V, etc.
When $f$ is a closed immersion, first assume that $S$, and $S'$(, and so $X$) are affine schemes. Let $S = mathrm{Spec} A, X = mathrm{Spec} A/mathfrak{a}$, and $S' = mathrm{Spec} B$. Then, $Xtimes_S S'=mathrm{Spec} A/mathfrak{a}otimes_A B=mathrm{Spec} B/mathfrak{a}B = V(mathfrak{a}B) = g^{-1}(V(mathfrak{a})) = g^{-1}(X)$. For the second last equality, if $phi: Ato B$ is the corresponding homomorphism between rings to $g$, then $mathfrak{q}in g^{-1}(V(mathfrak{a}))Leftrightarrow phi^{-1}(mathfrak{p})in V(mathfrak{a})Leftrightarrow phi^{-1}(mathfrak{p})supseteqmathfrak{a}Leftrightarrowmathfrak{p}supseteqphi(mathfrak{a})(=mathfrak{a}B)Leftrightarrow mathfrak{p}in V(mathfrak{a}B)$.
In the general case, take an affine open covering $S = cup_{jin J} V_j$, and for each $jin J$, $g^{-1}(V_j) = cup_{iin I_j} U_{i,j}$. Let $g_{i,j}:U_{i,j}to V_j$, and $g_{j}:g^{-1}(V_j)to V_j$ be the restriction of f. Then, $Xtimes_S S' = cup_{jin J}cup_{iin I_j} f^{-1}(V_j)times_{V_j} U_{i,j} = cupcup g_{i,j}^{-1} (V_j) = cup g_{j}^{-1} (V_j) = g^{-1}(V)$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In this answer, $X$(resp. $Xotimes_S S'$), and $mathrm{Im} f$(resp. $mathrm{Im} f'$) are identified. (This is not problematic at all, especially about $Xotimes_S S'$, and $mathrm{Im} f'$, thanks to the following fact. This is a standard result in algebraic geometry, and I think you have proved it in class. However, if you do not know it, please see Section 7.3, Proposition 13 of S. Bosch, Algebraic Geometry and Commutative Algebra, Springer, 2013 for a proof.)
Fact $f'$ is an open (resp. closed) immersion if $f$ is an open (resp. closed) immersion.
When $f$ is an open immersion, it is clear from the pull-back diagram
$$
begin{array}{ccccccccc}
g^{-1}(X)& xrightarrow{f'} & S' \
downarrow& & downarrow{g} \
X& xrightarrow{f} & S,
end{array}
$$
which owes to the universal property of open immersion.
Prop (The Universal Property of Open Immersion)
If $f:Xto Y$ is a morphism between schemes, $Vsubseteq Y$ an open subset(, or subscheme), and $f(X)subseteq V$, then there exists a unique morphism $f':Xto V$ whose composition with the open immersion $Vto X$ is $f$.
Proof You can do it through looking at the structure sheaf of V, etc.
When $f$ is a closed immersion, first assume that $S$, and $S'$(, and so $X$) are affine schemes. Let $S = mathrm{Spec} A, X = mathrm{Spec} A/mathfrak{a}$, and $S' = mathrm{Spec} B$. Then, $Xtimes_S S'=mathrm{Spec} A/mathfrak{a}otimes_A B=mathrm{Spec} B/mathfrak{a}B = V(mathfrak{a}B) = g^{-1}(V(mathfrak{a})) = g^{-1}(X)$. For the second last equality, if $phi: Ato B$ is the corresponding homomorphism between rings to $g$, then $mathfrak{q}in g^{-1}(V(mathfrak{a}))Leftrightarrow phi^{-1}(mathfrak{p})in V(mathfrak{a})Leftrightarrow phi^{-1}(mathfrak{p})supseteqmathfrak{a}Leftrightarrowmathfrak{p}supseteqphi(mathfrak{a})(=mathfrak{a}B)Leftrightarrow mathfrak{p}in V(mathfrak{a}B)$.
In the general case, take an affine open covering $S = cup_{jin J} V_j$, and for each $jin J$, $g^{-1}(V_j) = cup_{iin I_j} U_{i,j}$. Let $g_{i,j}:U_{i,j}to V_j$, and $g_{j}:g^{-1}(V_j)to V_j$ be the restriction of f. Then, $Xtimes_S S' = cup_{jin J}cup_{iin I_j} f^{-1}(V_j)times_{V_j} U_{i,j} = cupcup g_{i,j}^{-1} (V_j) = cup g_{j}^{-1} (V_j) = g^{-1}(V)$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In this answer, $X$(resp. $Xotimes_S S'$), and $mathrm{Im} f$(resp. $mathrm{Im} f'$) are identified. (This is not problematic at all, especially about $Xotimes_S S'$, and $mathrm{Im} f'$, thanks to the following fact. This is a standard result in algebraic geometry, and I think you have proved it in class. However, if you do not know it, please see Section 7.3, Proposition 13 of S. Bosch, Algebraic Geometry and Commutative Algebra, Springer, 2013 for a proof.)
Fact $f'$ is an open (resp. closed) immersion if $f$ is an open (resp. closed) immersion.
When $f$ is an open immersion, it is clear from the pull-back diagram
$$
begin{array}{ccccccccc}
g^{-1}(X)& xrightarrow{f'} & S' \
downarrow& & downarrow{g} \
X& xrightarrow{f} & S,
end{array}
$$
which owes to the universal property of open immersion.
Prop (The Universal Property of Open Immersion)
If $f:Xto Y$ is a morphism between schemes, $Vsubseteq Y$ an open subset(, or subscheme), and $f(X)subseteq V$, then there exists a unique morphism $f':Xto V$ whose composition with the open immersion $Vto X$ is $f$.
Proof You can do it through looking at the structure sheaf of V, etc.
When $f$ is a closed immersion, first assume that $S$, and $S'$(, and so $X$) are affine schemes. Let $S = mathrm{Spec} A, X = mathrm{Spec} A/mathfrak{a}$, and $S' = mathrm{Spec} B$. Then, $Xtimes_S S'=mathrm{Spec} A/mathfrak{a}otimes_A B=mathrm{Spec} B/mathfrak{a}B = V(mathfrak{a}B) = g^{-1}(V(mathfrak{a})) = g^{-1}(X)$. For the second last equality, if $phi: Ato B$ is the corresponding homomorphism between rings to $g$, then $mathfrak{q}in g^{-1}(V(mathfrak{a}))Leftrightarrow phi^{-1}(mathfrak{p})in V(mathfrak{a})Leftrightarrow phi^{-1}(mathfrak{p})supseteqmathfrak{a}Leftrightarrowmathfrak{p}supseteqphi(mathfrak{a})(=mathfrak{a}B)Leftrightarrow mathfrak{p}in V(mathfrak{a}B)$.
In the general case, take an affine open covering $S = cup_{jin J} V_j$, and for each $jin J$, $g^{-1}(V_j) = cup_{iin I_j} U_{i,j}$. Let $g_{i,j}:U_{i,j}to V_j$, and $g_{j}:g^{-1}(V_j)to V_j$ be the restriction of f. Then, $Xtimes_S S' = cup_{jin J}cup_{iin I_j} f^{-1}(V_j)times_{V_j} U_{i,j} = cupcup g_{i,j}^{-1} (V_j) = cup g_{j}^{-1} (V_j) = g^{-1}(V)$.
$endgroup$
In this answer, $X$(resp. $Xotimes_S S'$), and $mathrm{Im} f$(resp. $mathrm{Im} f'$) are identified. (This is not problematic at all, especially about $Xotimes_S S'$, and $mathrm{Im} f'$, thanks to the following fact. This is a standard result in algebraic geometry, and I think you have proved it in class. However, if you do not know it, please see Section 7.3, Proposition 13 of S. Bosch, Algebraic Geometry and Commutative Algebra, Springer, 2013 for a proof.)
Fact $f'$ is an open (resp. closed) immersion if $f$ is an open (resp. closed) immersion.
When $f$ is an open immersion, it is clear from the pull-back diagram
$$
begin{array}{ccccccccc}
g^{-1}(X)& xrightarrow{f'} & S' \
downarrow& & downarrow{g} \
X& xrightarrow{f} & S,
end{array}
$$
which owes to the universal property of open immersion.
Prop (The Universal Property of Open Immersion)
If $f:Xto Y$ is a morphism between schemes, $Vsubseteq Y$ an open subset(, or subscheme), and $f(X)subseteq V$, then there exists a unique morphism $f':Xto V$ whose composition with the open immersion $Vto X$ is $f$.
Proof You can do it through looking at the structure sheaf of V, etc.
When $f$ is a closed immersion, first assume that $S$, and $S'$(, and so $X$) are affine schemes. Let $S = mathrm{Spec} A, X = mathrm{Spec} A/mathfrak{a}$, and $S' = mathrm{Spec} B$. Then, $Xtimes_S S'=mathrm{Spec} A/mathfrak{a}otimes_A B=mathrm{Spec} B/mathfrak{a}B = V(mathfrak{a}B) = g^{-1}(V(mathfrak{a})) = g^{-1}(X)$. For the second last equality, if $phi: Ato B$ is the corresponding homomorphism between rings to $g$, then $mathfrak{q}in g^{-1}(V(mathfrak{a}))Leftrightarrow phi^{-1}(mathfrak{p})in V(mathfrak{a})Leftrightarrow phi^{-1}(mathfrak{p})supseteqmathfrak{a}Leftrightarrowmathfrak{p}supseteqphi(mathfrak{a})(=mathfrak{a}B)Leftrightarrow mathfrak{p}in V(mathfrak{a}B)$.
In the general case, take an affine open covering $S = cup_{jin J} V_j$, and for each $jin J$, $g^{-1}(V_j) = cup_{iin I_j} U_{i,j}$. Let $g_{i,j}:U_{i,j}to V_j$, and $g_{j}:g^{-1}(V_j)to V_j$ be the restriction of f. Then, $Xtimes_S S' = cup_{jin J}cup_{iin I_j} f^{-1}(V_j)times_{V_j} U_{i,j} = cupcup g_{i,j}^{-1} (V_j) = cup g_{j}^{-1} (V_j) = g^{-1}(V)$.
answered Dec 27 '18 at 4:03
neanderneander
265
265
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1802351%2fimage-of-base-change-of-immersion%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Is $operatorname{Im}$ the scheme-theoretic or set-theoretic image?
$endgroup$
– Hoot
May 27 '16 at 18:04
$begingroup$
Scheme-theoretic, I think...
$endgroup$
– CameronJWhitehead
May 27 '16 at 19:30