Is there a canonical isomorphism between $Votimes_F S$ and $V_Soplus V_S$?
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Let $E/F$ be a CM extension of number fields (i.e., $F$ is totally real and $E/F$ is a totally imaginary quadratic extension). I assume $E=F[alpha]$ with $alphain Ebackslash F$ such that $alpha^2in F$. I denote by $xmapstobar{x}$ the non-trivial element of $Gal(E/F)$.
If $S$ is an $E$-algebra, I have an isomorphism
$$phi: Eotimes_F Ssimeq Stimes S $$
given by mapping $xotimes s$ to $(bar{x}s,xs)$. Its inverse $phi^{-1}$ maps $(s,t)in Stimes S$ to
$alphaotimes frac{t-s}{2alpha} + 1otimes frac{s+t}{2} in Eotimes_F S $ (this doesn't depend on the choice of $alpha$).
Now let $V$ be an $E$-vector space, say of dimension $n=3$ (which is my case of interest, but the answer shouldn't depend on $n$) and denote by $V_S:=Votimes_E S$. My question is:
Is there a canonical way to define an isomorphism (of $S$-modules) between $Votimes_F S$
and $V_Soplus V_S$ ?
My problem is the following: if I choose an $E$-basis $mathcal{B}={e_1,e_2,e_3}$ of $V$ (which is still an $S$-basis of $V_S$ and an $Eotimes_F S$-basis of $Votimes_F S$), then one can define an isomorphism as above by mapping a column vector $X=begin{pmatrix}x_1\ x_2\ x_3end{pmatrix}in (Eotimes_F S)^3simeq_{mathcal{B}} Votimes_F S$, to
$phi(X)=begin{pmatrix}phi(x_1)\ phi(x_2)\ phi(x_3)end{pmatrix}=:(phi(X)_1,phi(X)_2)in S^3times S^3simeq_{mathcal{B}}V_Soplus V_S$.
But if $mathcal{B}'$ is another $E$-basis of $V$, denote by $Pin GL_3(E)$ the transition matrix (whose columns are the coordinates of the vectors of $mathcal{B}$ in $mathcal{B}'$): then a column vector $Xin (Eotimes_F S)^3$ in $mathcal{B}$ is changed into $PX$ in $mathcal{B}'$, thus maps to
$phi(PX)=(phi(PX)_1,phi(PX)_2)=(bar{P}phi(X)_1,Pphi(X)_2)in S^3times S^3$, whereas
$(phi(X)_1,phi(X)_2)$ is changed into $(Pphi(X)_1,Pphi(X)_2)neq (bar{P}phi(X)_1,Pphi(X)_2) $
Is there any way to do things canonically ?
In the end, I am interested in knowing whether there exists a canonical isomorphism between these two modules (which would give a canonical isomorphism between groups $GL(Votimes_F S)$ and $GL(V_S)times GL(V_S)$) such that, if $langle,,,rangle$ is a given $E/F$-hermitian product on $V$, which we can extend to $Votimes_F S$ with values in $Eotimes_S F$, then
for any $gin GL(Votimes_F S)$, for all $v$, $win Votimes_F S$, the quantity
$langle gcdot{}v,gcdot{}wranglein Eotimes_F S$ admits a nice description (i.e., corresponds by $phi:Eotimes_F Srightarrow Stimes S$) as a pair of $S$-bilinear products on $V_S$ whose definition is canonical. I managed to do something, but this implies choosing a basis of $V$ to define $Votimes_F Ssimeq V_Soplus V_S$ and to define the bilinear products on $V_S$ (but the two combined do not depend on $mathcal{B}$, luckily !).
In the very end, I want to show that the subgroup of $GL(Votimes_F S)$ that preserves $langle,,,rangle_{Votimes_F S}$ (which we call $U(V)(S)$ )maps canonically to $GL(V_S)$.
Thanks a lot for your help !
linear-algebra group-theory bilinear-form galois-extensions
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Let $E/F$ be a CM extension of number fields (i.e., $F$ is totally real and $E/F$ is a totally imaginary quadratic extension). I assume $E=F[alpha]$ with $alphain Ebackslash F$ such that $alpha^2in F$. I denote by $xmapstobar{x}$ the non-trivial element of $Gal(E/F)$.
If $S$ is an $E$-algebra, I have an isomorphism
$$phi: Eotimes_F Ssimeq Stimes S $$
given by mapping $xotimes s$ to $(bar{x}s,xs)$. Its inverse $phi^{-1}$ maps $(s,t)in Stimes S$ to
$alphaotimes frac{t-s}{2alpha} + 1otimes frac{s+t}{2} in Eotimes_F S $ (this doesn't depend on the choice of $alpha$).
Now let $V$ be an $E$-vector space, say of dimension $n=3$ (which is my case of interest, but the answer shouldn't depend on $n$) and denote by $V_S:=Votimes_E S$. My question is:
Is there a canonical way to define an isomorphism (of $S$-modules) between $Votimes_F S$
and $V_Soplus V_S$ ?
My problem is the following: if I choose an $E$-basis $mathcal{B}={e_1,e_2,e_3}$ of $V$ (which is still an $S$-basis of $V_S$ and an $Eotimes_F S$-basis of $Votimes_F S$), then one can define an isomorphism as above by mapping a column vector $X=begin{pmatrix}x_1\ x_2\ x_3end{pmatrix}in (Eotimes_F S)^3simeq_{mathcal{B}} Votimes_F S$, to
$phi(X)=begin{pmatrix}phi(x_1)\ phi(x_2)\ phi(x_3)end{pmatrix}=:(phi(X)_1,phi(X)_2)in S^3times S^3simeq_{mathcal{B}}V_Soplus V_S$.
But if $mathcal{B}'$ is another $E$-basis of $V$, denote by $Pin GL_3(E)$ the transition matrix (whose columns are the coordinates of the vectors of $mathcal{B}$ in $mathcal{B}'$): then a column vector $Xin (Eotimes_F S)^3$ in $mathcal{B}$ is changed into $PX$ in $mathcal{B}'$, thus maps to
$phi(PX)=(phi(PX)_1,phi(PX)_2)=(bar{P}phi(X)_1,Pphi(X)_2)in S^3times S^3$, whereas
$(phi(X)_1,phi(X)_2)$ is changed into $(Pphi(X)_1,Pphi(X)_2)neq (bar{P}phi(X)_1,Pphi(X)_2) $
Is there any way to do things canonically ?
In the end, I am interested in knowing whether there exists a canonical isomorphism between these two modules (which would give a canonical isomorphism between groups $GL(Votimes_F S)$ and $GL(V_S)times GL(V_S)$) such that, if $langle,,,rangle$ is a given $E/F$-hermitian product on $V$, which we can extend to $Votimes_F S$ with values in $Eotimes_S F$, then
for any $gin GL(Votimes_F S)$, for all $v$, $win Votimes_F S$, the quantity
$langle gcdot{}v,gcdot{}wranglein Eotimes_F S$ admits a nice description (i.e., corresponds by $phi:Eotimes_F Srightarrow Stimes S$) as a pair of $S$-bilinear products on $V_S$ whose definition is canonical. I managed to do something, but this implies choosing a basis of $V$ to define $Votimes_F Ssimeq V_Soplus V_S$ and to define the bilinear products on $V_S$ (but the two combined do not depend on $mathcal{B}$, luckily !).
In the very end, I want to show that the subgroup of $GL(Votimes_F S)$ that preserves $langle,,,rangle_{Votimes_F S}$ (which we call $U(V)(S)$ )maps canonically to $GL(V_S)$.
Thanks a lot for your help !
linear-algebra group-theory bilinear-form galois-extensions
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Let $E/F$ be a CM extension of number fields (i.e., $F$ is totally real and $E/F$ is a totally imaginary quadratic extension). I assume $E=F[alpha]$ with $alphain Ebackslash F$ such that $alpha^2in F$. I denote by $xmapstobar{x}$ the non-trivial element of $Gal(E/F)$.
If $S$ is an $E$-algebra, I have an isomorphism
$$phi: Eotimes_F Ssimeq Stimes S $$
given by mapping $xotimes s$ to $(bar{x}s,xs)$. Its inverse $phi^{-1}$ maps $(s,t)in Stimes S$ to
$alphaotimes frac{t-s}{2alpha} + 1otimes frac{s+t}{2} in Eotimes_F S $ (this doesn't depend on the choice of $alpha$).
Now let $V$ be an $E$-vector space, say of dimension $n=3$ (which is my case of interest, but the answer shouldn't depend on $n$) and denote by $V_S:=Votimes_E S$. My question is:
Is there a canonical way to define an isomorphism (of $S$-modules) between $Votimes_F S$
and $V_Soplus V_S$ ?
My problem is the following: if I choose an $E$-basis $mathcal{B}={e_1,e_2,e_3}$ of $V$ (which is still an $S$-basis of $V_S$ and an $Eotimes_F S$-basis of $Votimes_F S$), then one can define an isomorphism as above by mapping a column vector $X=begin{pmatrix}x_1\ x_2\ x_3end{pmatrix}in (Eotimes_F S)^3simeq_{mathcal{B}} Votimes_F S$, to
$phi(X)=begin{pmatrix}phi(x_1)\ phi(x_2)\ phi(x_3)end{pmatrix}=:(phi(X)_1,phi(X)_2)in S^3times S^3simeq_{mathcal{B}}V_Soplus V_S$.
But if $mathcal{B}'$ is another $E$-basis of $V$, denote by $Pin GL_3(E)$ the transition matrix (whose columns are the coordinates of the vectors of $mathcal{B}$ in $mathcal{B}'$): then a column vector $Xin (Eotimes_F S)^3$ in $mathcal{B}$ is changed into $PX$ in $mathcal{B}'$, thus maps to
$phi(PX)=(phi(PX)_1,phi(PX)_2)=(bar{P}phi(X)_1,Pphi(X)_2)in S^3times S^3$, whereas
$(phi(X)_1,phi(X)_2)$ is changed into $(Pphi(X)_1,Pphi(X)_2)neq (bar{P}phi(X)_1,Pphi(X)_2) $
Is there any way to do things canonically ?
In the end, I am interested in knowing whether there exists a canonical isomorphism between these two modules (which would give a canonical isomorphism between groups $GL(Votimes_F S)$ and $GL(V_S)times GL(V_S)$) such that, if $langle,,,rangle$ is a given $E/F$-hermitian product on $V$, which we can extend to $Votimes_F S$ with values in $Eotimes_S F$, then
for any $gin GL(Votimes_F S)$, for all $v$, $win Votimes_F S$, the quantity
$langle gcdot{}v,gcdot{}wranglein Eotimes_F S$ admits a nice description (i.e., corresponds by $phi:Eotimes_F Srightarrow Stimes S$) as a pair of $S$-bilinear products on $V_S$ whose definition is canonical. I managed to do something, but this implies choosing a basis of $V$ to define $Votimes_F Ssimeq V_Soplus V_S$ and to define the bilinear products on $V_S$ (but the two combined do not depend on $mathcal{B}$, luckily !).
In the very end, I want to show that the subgroup of $GL(Votimes_F S)$ that preserves $langle,,,rangle_{Votimes_F S}$ (which we call $U(V)(S)$ )maps canonically to $GL(V_S)$.
Thanks a lot for your help !
linear-algebra group-theory bilinear-form galois-extensions
Let $E/F$ be a CM extension of number fields (i.e., $F$ is totally real and $E/F$ is a totally imaginary quadratic extension). I assume $E=F[alpha]$ with $alphain Ebackslash F$ such that $alpha^2in F$. I denote by $xmapstobar{x}$ the non-trivial element of $Gal(E/F)$.
If $S$ is an $E$-algebra, I have an isomorphism
$$phi: Eotimes_F Ssimeq Stimes S $$
given by mapping $xotimes s$ to $(bar{x}s,xs)$. Its inverse $phi^{-1}$ maps $(s,t)in Stimes S$ to
$alphaotimes frac{t-s}{2alpha} + 1otimes frac{s+t}{2} in Eotimes_F S $ (this doesn't depend on the choice of $alpha$).
Now let $V$ be an $E$-vector space, say of dimension $n=3$ (which is my case of interest, but the answer shouldn't depend on $n$) and denote by $V_S:=Votimes_E S$. My question is:
Is there a canonical way to define an isomorphism (of $S$-modules) between $Votimes_F S$
and $V_Soplus V_S$ ?
My problem is the following: if I choose an $E$-basis $mathcal{B}={e_1,e_2,e_3}$ of $V$ (which is still an $S$-basis of $V_S$ and an $Eotimes_F S$-basis of $Votimes_F S$), then one can define an isomorphism as above by mapping a column vector $X=begin{pmatrix}x_1\ x_2\ x_3end{pmatrix}in (Eotimes_F S)^3simeq_{mathcal{B}} Votimes_F S$, to
$phi(X)=begin{pmatrix}phi(x_1)\ phi(x_2)\ phi(x_3)end{pmatrix}=:(phi(X)_1,phi(X)_2)in S^3times S^3simeq_{mathcal{B}}V_Soplus V_S$.
But if $mathcal{B}'$ is another $E$-basis of $V$, denote by $Pin GL_3(E)$ the transition matrix (whose columns are the coordinates of the vectors of $mathcal{B}$ in $mathcal{B}'$): then a column vector $Xin (Eotimes_F S)^3$ in $mathcal{B}$ is changed into $PX$ in $mathcal{B}'$, thus maps to
$phi(PX)=(phi(PX)_1,phi(PX)_2)=(bar{P}phi(X)_1,Pphi(X)_2)in S^3times S^3$, whereas
$(phi(X)_1,phi(X)_2)$ is changed into $(Pphi(X)_1,Pphi(X)_2)neq (bar{P}phi(X)_1,Pphi(X)_2) $
Is there any way to do things canonically ?
In the end, I am interested in knowing whether there exists a canonical isomorphism between these two modules (which would give a canonical isomorphism between groups $GL(Votimes_F S)$ and $GL(V_S)times GL(V_S)$) such that, if $langle,,,rangle$ is a given $E/F$-hermitian product on $V$, which we can extend to $Votimes_F S$ with values in $Eotimes_S F$, then
for any $gin GL(Votimes_F S)$, for all $v$, $win Votimes_F S$, the quantity
$langle gcdot{}v,gcdot{}wranglein Eotimes_F S$ admits a nice description (i.e., corresponds by $phi:Eotimes_F Srightarrow Stimes S$) as a pair of $S$-bilinear products on $V_S$ whose definition is canonical. I managed to do something, but this implies choosing a basis of $V$ to define $Votimes_F Ssimeq V_Soplus V_S$ and to define the bilinear products on $V_S$ (but the two combined do not depend on $mathcal{B}$, luckily !).
In the very end, I want to show that the subgroup of $GL(Votimes_F S)$ that preserves $langle,,,rangle_{Votimes_F S}$ (which we call $U(V)(S)$ )maps canonically to $GL(V_S)$.
Thanks a lot for your help !
linear-algebra group-theory bilinear-form galois-extensions
linear-algebra group-theory bilinear-form galois-extensions
asked Nov 22 at 16:12
Yoël
451111
451111
add a comment |
add a comment |
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3009307%2fis-there-a-canonical-isomorphism-between-v-otimes-f-s-and-v-s-oplus-v-s%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3009307%2fis-there-a-canonical-isomorphism-between-v-otimes-f-s-and-v-s-oplus-v-s%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown