Multiline equation with some characters that span all lines
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
I'm attempting to create a multiline equation with some characters than span both lines.
I've come closer by using the amsmath package
begin{multline*}
Pr[Xleftarrow DECODE(Delta;r_1,...,r_ell) |
displaystyle{(Delta;q_1,...,q_ell)leftarrow QUERY(1^lambda;J)} \
displaystyle{Lambda (Lambda^ell _{j=1})}
]
end{multline*}
But I'm at a loss as this does not allow me to span some characters on both lines
Any suggestions would be appreciated.
equations amsmath
New contributor
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
I'm attempting to create a multiline equation with some characters than span both lines.
I've come closer by using the amsmath package
begin{multline*}
Pr[Xleftarrow DECODE(Delta;r_1,...,r_ell) |
displaystyle{(Delta;q_1,...,q_ell)leftarrow QUERY(1^lambda;J)} \
displaystyle{Lambda (Lambda^ell _{j=1})}
]
end{multline*}
But I'm at a loss as this does not allow me to span some characters on both lines
Any suggestions would be appreciated.
equations amsmath
New contributor
What about insert the right contents in array with 2 rows?
– Sigur
3 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
I'm attempting to create a multiline equation with some characters than span both lines.
I've come closer by using the amsmath package
begin{multline*}
Pr[Xleftarrow DECODE(Delta;r_1,...,r_ell) |
displaystyle{(Delta;q_1,...,q_ell)leftarrow QUERY(1^lambda;J)} \
displaystyle{Lambda (Lambda^ell _{j=1})}
]
end{multline*}
But I'm at a loss as this does not allow me to span some characters on both lines
Any suggestions would be appreciated.
equations amsmath
New contributor
I'm attempting to create a multiline equation with some characters than span both lines.
I've come closer by using the amsmath package
begin{multline*}
Pr[Xleftarrow DECODE(Delta;r_1,...,r_ell) |
displaystyle{(Delta;q_1,...,q_ell)leftarrow QUERY(1^lambda;J)} \
displaystyle{Lambda (Lambda^ell _{j=1})}
]
end{multline*}
But I'm at a loss as this does not allow me to span some characters on both lines
Any suggestions would be appreciated.
equations amsmath
equations amsmath
New contributor
New contributor
edited 2 hours ago
Mico
272k30369756
272k30369756
New contributor
asked 3 hours ago
Tarald Riise
211
211
New contributor
New contributor
What about insert the right contents in array with 2 rows?
– Sigur
3 hours ago
add a comment |
What about insert the right contents in array with 2 rows?
– Sigur
3 hours ago
What about insert the right contents in array with 2 rows?
– Sigur
3 hours ago
What about insert the right contents in array with 2 rows?
– Sigur
3 hours ago
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
up vote
3
down vote
by use of array
:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
[
Pr left[Xleftarrowtext{DECODE}(Delta;r_1,dotsc,r_ell) middle|
begin{array}{l}
(Delta;q_1,dotsc,q_ell)leftarrow text{QUERY}(1^lambda;J) \
Lambda(Lambda^ell _{j=1}) leftarrowtext{RESPOND}(X^{(j)}:q_j
end{array}
right]
]
end{document}
1
You won by few seconds. lol
– Sigur
3 hours ago
1
Also, missingdots
.
– Sigur
3 hours ago
1
thank you very much to all who pointed me to weakness/errors in my code. i was to much focused to show solution how to write right part of expression in two left aligned lines.
– Zarko
3 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
My main suggestions are (a) use biggl[
, biggm|
, and biggr]
to structure the equation and (b) use a two-row array
environment for the material between biggm|
and biggr]
. I wouldn't use a multline*
environment, though. An unnumbered single-line display math environment does fine.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{array} % for 'newcolumntype' macro
newcolumntype{L}{>{displaystyle}l} % automatic displaystyle math mode
begin{document}
[
Prbiggl[
Xleftarrow mathit{DECODE}(Delta;r_1,dots,r_ell)
biggm|
begin{array}{@{}L@{}}
(Delta;q_1,dots,q_ell)leftarrow mathit{QUERY}(1^lambda;J) \
Lambda bigl(Lambda^ell_{j=1}leftarrow mathit{RESPOND}(X^{(j)};q_j)bigr)
end{array}
biggr]
]
end{document}
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
The image has several inconsistencies in the typesetting.
I suggest to define semantic commands in order to be sure that similar objects are always typeset the same.
I don't like ell
, but you can use it in place of the plain l
.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
newcommand{func}[1]{mathit{#1}}
begin{document}
begin{equation*}
Prleft[
X gets func{DECODE}(Delta;r_1,dots,r_l)
;middle|;
begin{matrix}
(Delta;q_1,dots,q_l) gets func{QUERY}(1^lambda;J) \
Lambda(Lambda_{j=1}^l gets func{RESPOND}(X^{(j)};q_j))
end{matrix}
right]
end{equation*}
end{document}
A slightly different approach, where you specify the brackets as inherently attached to Pr
and can choose their size (see the documentation of DeclarePairedDelimiter
in mathtools
). Basically, Pr*
selects automatic size, Pr[big]
(or any other delimiter size changing command in the optional argument) selects the stated size.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath,mathtools}
newcommand{func}[1]{mathit{#1}}
renewcommand{Pr}{operatorname{Pr}brackets}
DeclarePairedDelimiterX{brackets}[1]{[}{]}{#1}
newcommand{given}{;delimsize|;mathopen{}}
begin{document}
begin{equation*}
Pr*{
X gets func{DECODE}(Delta;r_1,dots,r_l)
given
begin{matrix}
(Delta;q_1,dots,q_l) gets func{QUERY}(1^lambda;J) \
Lambda(Lambda_{j=1}^l gets func{RESPOND}(X^{(j)};q_j))
end{matrix}
}
end{equation*}
begin{equation*}
Pr[Big]{
X gets func{DECODE}(Delta;r_1,dots,r_l)
given
begin{matrix}
(Delta;q_1,dots,q_l) gets func{QUERY}(1^lambda;J) \
Lambda(Lambda_{j=1}^l gets func{RESPOND}(X^{(j)};q_j))
end{matrix}
}
end{equation*}
begin{equation*}
Pr[bigg]{
X gets func{DECODE}(Delta;r_1,dots,r_l)
given
begin{matrix}
(Delta;q_1,dots,q_l) gets func{QUERY}(1^lambda;J) \
Lambda(Lambda_{j=1}^l gets func{RESPOND}(X^{(j)};q_j))
end{matrix}
}
end{equation*}
end{document}
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Tarald Riise is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f466089%2fmultiline-equation-with-some-characters-that-span-all-lines%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
3
down vote
by use of array
:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
[
Pr left[Xleftarrowtext{DECODE}(Delta;r_1,dotsc,r_ell) middle|
begin{array}{l}
(Delta;q_1,dotsc,q_ell)leftarrow text{QUERY}(1^lambda;J) \
Lambda(Lambda^ell _{j=1}) leftarrowtext{RESPOND}(X^{(j)}:q_j
end{array}
right]
]
end{document}
1
You won by few seconds. lol
– Sigur
3 hours ago
1
Also, missingdots
.
– Sigur
3 hours ago
1
thank you very much to all who pointed me to weakness/errors in my code. i was to much focused to show solution how to write right part of expression in two left aligned lines.
– Zarko
3 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
by use of array
:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
[
Pr left[Xleftarrowtext{DECODE}(Delta;r_1,dotsc,r_ell) middle|
begin{array}{l}
(Delta;q_1,dotsc,q_ell)leftarrow text{QUERY}(1^lambda;J) \
Lambda(Lambda^ell _{j=1}) leftarrowtext{RESPOND}(X^{(j)}:q_j
end{array}
right]
]
end{document}
1
You won by few seconds. lol
– Sigur
3 hours ago
1
Also, missingdots
.
– Sigur
3 hours ago
1
thank you very much to all who pointed me to weakness/errors in my code. i was to much focused to show solution how to write right part of expression in two left aligned lines.
– Zarko
3 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
up vote
3
down vote
by use of array
:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
[
Pr left[Xleftarrowtext{DECODE}(Delta;r_1,dotsc,r_ell) middle|
begin{array}{l}
(Delta;q_1,dotsc,q_ell)leftarrow text{QUERY}(1^lambda;J) \
Lambda(Lambda^ell _{j=1}) leftarrowtext{RESPOND}(X^{(j)}:q_j
end{array}
right]
]
end{document}
by use of array
:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
[
Pr left[Xleftarrowtext{DECODE}(Delta;r_1,dotsc,r_ell) middle|
begin{array}{l}
(Delta;q_1,dotsc,q_ell)leftarrow text{QUERY}(1^lambda;J) \
Lambda(Lambda^ell _{j=1}) leftarrowtext{RESPOND}(X^{(j)}:q_j
end{array}
right]
]
end{document}
edited 3 hours ago
answered 3 hours ago
Zarko
119k865155
119k865155
1
You won by few seconds. lol
– Sigur
3 hours ago
1
Also, missingdots
.
– Sigur
3 hours ago
1
thank you very much to all who pointed me to weakness/errors in my code. i was to much focused to show solution how to write right part of expression in two left aligned lines.
– Zarko
3 hours ago
add a comment |
1
You won by few seconds. lol
– Sigur
3 hours ago
1
Also, missingdots
.
– Sigur
3 hours ago
1
thank you very much to all who pointed me to weakness/errors in my code. i was to much focused to show solution how to write right part of expression in two left aligned lines.
– Zarko
3 hours ago
1
1
You won by few seconds. lol
– Sigur
3 hours ago
You won by few seconds. lol
– Sigur
3 hours ago
1
1
Also, missing
dots
.– Sigur
3 hours ago
Also, missing
dots
.– Sigur
3 hours ago
1
1
thank you very much to all who pointed me to weakness/errors in my code. i was to much focused to show solution how to write right part of expression in two left aligned lines.
– Zarko
3 hours ago
thank you very much to all who pointed me to weakness/errors in my code. i was to much focused to show solution how to write right part of expression in two left aligned lines.
– Zarko
3 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
My main suggestions are (a) use biggl[
, biggm|
, and biggr]
to structure the equation and (b) use a two-row array
environment for the material between biggm|
and biggr]
. I wouldn't use a multline*
environment, though. An unnumbered single-line display math environment does fine.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{array} % for 'newcolumntype' macro
newcolumntype{L}{>{displaystyle}l} % automatic displaystyle math mode
begin{document}
[
Prbiggl[
Xleftarrow mathit{DECODE}(Delta;r_1,dots,r_ell)
biggm|
begin{array}{@{}L@{}}
(Delta;q_1,dots,q_ell)leftarrow mathit{QUERY}(1^lambda;J) \
Lambda bigl(Lambda^ell_{j=1}leftarrow mathit{RESPOND}(X^{(j)};q_j)bigr)
end{array}
biggr]
]
end{document}
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
My main suggestions are (a) use biggl[
, biggm|
, and biggr]
to structure the equation and (b) use a two-row array
environment for the material between biggm|
and biggr]
. I wouldn't use a multline*
environment, though. An unnumbered single-line display math environment does fine.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{array} % for 'newcolumntype' macro
newcolumntype{L}{>{displaystyle}l} % automatic displaystyle math mode
begin{document}
[
Prbiggl[
Xleftarrow mathit{DECODE}(Delta;r_1,dots,r_ell)
biggm|
begin{array}{@{}L@{}}
(Delta;q_1,dots,q_ell)leftarrow mathit{QUERY}(1^lambda;J) \
Lambda bigl(Lambda^ell_{j=1}leftarrow mathit{RESPOND}(X^{(j)};q_j)bigr)
end{array}
biggr]
]
end{document}
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
up vote
2
down vote
My main suggestions are (a) use biggl[
, biggm|
, and biggr]
to structure the equation and (b) use a two-row array
environment for the material between biggm|
and biggr]
. I wouldn't use a multline*
environment, though. An unnumbered single-line display math environment does fine.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{array} % for 'newcolumntype' macro
newcolumntype{L}{>{displaystyle}l} % automatic displaystyle math mode
begin{document}
[
Prbiggl[
Xleftarrow mathit{DECODE}(Delta;r_1,dots,r_ell)
biggm|
begin{array}{@{}L@{}}
(Delta;q_1,dots,q_ell)leftarrow mathit{QUERY}(1^lambda;J) \
Lambda bigl(Lambda^ell_{j=1}leftarrow mathit{RESPOND}(X^{(j)};q_j)bigr)
end{array}
biggr]
]
end{document}
My main suggestions are (a) use biggl[
, biggm|
, and biggr]
to structure the equation and (b) use a two-row array
environment for the material between biggm|
and biggr]
. I wouldn't use a multline*
environment, though. An unnumbered single-line display math environment does fine.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{array} % for 'newcolumntype' macro
newcolumntype{L}{>{displaystyle}l} % automatic displaystyle math mode
begin{document}
[
Prbiggl[
Xleftarrow mathit{DECODE}(Delta;r_1,dots,r_ell)
biggm|
begin{array}{@{}L@{}}
(Delta;q_1,dots,q_ell)leftarrow mathit{QUERY}(1^lambda;J) \
Lambda bigl(Lambda^ell_{j=1}leftarrow mathit{RESPOND}(X^{(j)};q_j)bigr)
end{array}
biggr]
]
end{document}
edited 2 hours ago
answered 3 hours ago
Mico
272k30369756
272k30369756
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
The image has several inconsistencies in the typesetting.
I suggest to define semantic commands in order to be sure that similar objects are always typeset the same.
I don't like ell
, but you can use it in place of the plain l
.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
newcommand{func}[1]{mathit{#1}}
begin{document}
begin{equation*}
Prleft[
X gets func{DECODE}(Delta;r_1,dots,r_l)
;middle|;
begin{matrix}
(Delta;q_1,dots,q_l) gets func{QUERY}(1^lambda;J) \
Lambda(Lambda_{j=1}^l gets func{RESPOND}(X^{(j)};q_j))
end{matrix}
right]
end{equation*}
end{document}
A slightly different approach, where you specify the brackets as inherently attached to Pr
and can choose their size (see the documentation of DeclarePairedDelimiter
in mathtools
). Basically, Pr*
selects automatic size, Pr[big]
(or any other delimiter size changing command in the optional argument) selects the stated size.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath,mathtools}
newcommand{func}[1]{mathit{#1}}
renewcommand{Pr}{operatorname{Pr}brackets}
DeclarePairedDelimiterX{brackets}[1]{[}{]}{#1}
newcommand{given}{;delimsize|;mathopen{}}
begin{document}
begin{equation*}
Pr*{
X gets func{DECODE}(Delta;r_1,dots,r_l)
given
begin{matrix}
(Delta;q_1,dots,q_l) gets func{QUERY}(1^lambda;J) \
Lambda(Lambda_{j=1}^l gets func{RESPOND}(X^{(j)};q_j))
end{matrix}
}
end{equation*}
begin{equation*}
Pr[Big]{
X gets func{DECODE}(Delta;r_1,dots,r_l)
given
begin{matrix}
(Delta;q_1,dots,q_l) gets func{QUERY}(1^lambda;J) \
Lambda(Lambda_{j=1}^l gets func{RESPOND}(X^{(j)};q_j))
end{matrix}
}
end{equation*}
begin{equation*}
Pr[bigg]{
X gets func{DECODE}(Delta;r_1,dots,r_l)
given
begin{matrix}
(Delta;q_1,dots,q_l) gets func{QUERY}(1^lambda;J) \
Lambda(Lambda_{j=1}^l gets func{RESPOND}(X^{(j)};q_j))
end{matrix}
}
end{equation*}
end{document}
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
The image has several inconsistencies in the typesetting.
I suggest to define semantic commands in order to be sure that similar objects are always typeset the same.
I don't like ell
, but you can use it in place of the plain l
.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
newcommand{func}[1]{mathit{#1}}
begin{document}
begin{equation*}
Prleft[
X gets func{DECODE}(Delta;r_1,dots,r_l)
;middle|;
begin{matrix}
(Delta;q_1,dots,q_l) gets func{QUERY}(1^lambda;J) \
Lambda(Lambda_{j=1}^l gets func{RESPOND}(X^{(j)};q_j))
end{matrix}
right]
end{equation*}
end{document}
A slightly different approach, where you specify the brackets as inherently attached to Pr
and can choose their size (see the documentation of DeclarePairedDelimiter
in mathtools
). Basically, Pr*
selects automatic size, Pr[big]
(or any other delimiter size changing command in the optional argument) selects the stated size.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath,mathtools}
newcommand{func}[1]{mathit{#1}}
renewcommand{Pr}{operatorname{Pr}brackets}
DeclarePairedDelimiterX{brackets}[1]{[}{]}{#1}
newcommand{given}{;delimsize|;mathopen{}}
begin{document}
begin{equation*}
Pr*{
X gets func{DECODE}(Delta;r_1,dots,r_l)
given
begin{matrix}
(Delta;q_1,dots,q_l) gets func{QUERY}(1^lambda;J) \
Lambda(Lambda_{j=1}^l gets func{RESPOND}(X^{(j)};q_j))
end{matrix}
}
end{equation*}
begin{equation*}
Pr[Big]{
X gets func{DECODE}(Delta;r_1,dots,r_l)
given
begin{matrix}
(Delta;q_1,dots,q_l) gets func{QUERY}(1^lambda;J) \
Lambda(Lambda_{j=1}^l gets func{RESPOND}(X^{(j)};q_j))
end{matrix}
}
end{equation*}
begin{equation*}
Pr[bigg]{
X gets func{DECODE}(Delta;r_1,dots,r_l)
given
begin{matrix}
(Delta;q_1,dots,q_l) gets func{QUERY}(1^lambda;J) \
Lambda(Lambda_{j=1}^l gets func{RESPOND}(X^{(j)};q_j))
end{matrix}
}
end{equation*}
end{document}
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
up vote
2
down vote
The image has several inconsistencies in the typesetting.
I suggest to define semantic commands in order to be sure that similar objects are always typeset the same.
I don't like ell
, but you can use it in place of the plain l
.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
newcommand{func}[1]{mathit{#1}}
begin{document}
begin{equation*}
Prleft[
X gets func{DECODE}(Delta;r_1,dots,r_l)
;middle|;
begin{matrix}
(Delta;q_1,dots,q_l) gets func{QUERY}(1^lambda;J) \
Lambda(Lambda_{j=1}^l gets func{RESPOND}(X^{(j)};q_j))
end{matrix}
right]
end{equation*}
end{document}
A slightly different approach, where you specify the brackets as inherently attached to Pr
and can choose their size (see the documentation of DeclarePairedDelimiter
in mathtools
). Basically, Pr*
selects automatic size, Pr[big]
(or any other delimiter size changing command in the optional argument) selects the stated size.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath,mathtools}
newcommand{func}[1]{mathit{#1}}
renewcommand{Pr}{operatorname{Pr}brackets}
DeclarePairedDelimiterX{brackets}[1]{[}{]}{#1}
newcommand{given}{;delimsize|;mathopen{}}
begin{document}
begin{equation*}
Pr*{
X gets func{DECODE}(Delta;r_1,dots,r_l)
given
begin{matrix}
(Delta;q_1,dots,q_l) gets func{QUERY}(1^lambda;J) \
Lambda(Lambda_{j=1}^l gets func{RESPOND}(X^{(j)};q_j))
end{matrix}
}
end{equation*}
begin{equation*}
Pr[Big]{
X gets func{DECODE}(Delta;r_1,dots,r_l)
given
begin{matrix}
(Delta;q_1,dots,q_l) gets func{QUERY}(1^lambda;J) \
Lambda(Lambda_{j=1}^l gets func{RESPOND}(X^{(j)};q_j))
end{matrix}
}
end{equation*}
begin{equation*}
Pr[bigg]{
X gets func{DECODE}(Delta;r_1,dots,r_l)
given
begin{matrix}
(Delta;q_1,dots,q_l) gets func{QUERY}(1^lambda;J) \
Lambda(Lambda_{j=1}^l gets func{RESPOND}(X^{(j)};q_j))
end{matrix}
}
end{equation*}
end{document}
The image has several inconsistencies in the typesetting.
I suggest to define semantic commands in order to be sure that similar objects are always typeset the same.
I don't like ell
, but you can use it in place of the plain l
.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
newcommand{func}[1]{mathit{#1}}
begin{document}
begin{equation*}
Prleft[
X gets func{DECODE}(Delta;r_1,dots,r_l)
;middle|;
begin{matrix}
(Delta;q_1,dots,q_l) gets func{QUERY}(1^lambda;J) \
Lambda(Lambda_{j=1}^l gets func{RESPOND}(X^{(j)};q_j))
end{matrix}
right]
end{equation*}
end{document}
A slightly different approach, where you specify the brackets as inherently attached to Pr
and can choose their size (see the documentation of DeclarePairedDelimiter
in mathtools
). Basically, Pr*
selects automatic size, Pr[big]
(or any other delimiter size changing command in the optional argument) selects the stated size.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath,mathtools}
newcommand{func}[1]{mathit{#1}}
renewcommand{Pr}{operatorname{Pr}brackets}
DeclarePairedDelimiterX{brackets}[1]{[}{]}{#1}
newcommand{given}{;delimsize|;mathopen{}}
begin{document}
begin{equation*}
Pr*{
X gets func{DECODE}(Delta;r_1,dots,r_l)
given
begin{matrix}
(Delta;q_1,dots,q_l) gets func{QUERY}(1^lambda;J) \
Lambda(Lambda_{j=1}^l gets func{RESPOND}(X^{(j)};q_j))
end{matrix}
}
end{equation*}
begin{equation*}
Pr[Big]{
X gets func{DECODE}(Delta;r_1,dots,r_l)
given
begin{matrix}
(Delta;q_1,dots,q_l) gets func{QUERY}(1^lambda;J) \
Lambda(Lambda_{j=1}^l gets func{RESPOND}(X^{(j)};q_j))
end{matrix}
}
end{equation*}
begin{equation*}
Pr[bigg]{
X gets func{DECODE}(Delta;r_1,dots,r_l)
given
begin{matrix}
(Delta;q_1,dots,q_l) gets func{QUERY}(1^lambda;J) \
Lambda(Lambda_{j=1}^l gets func{RESPOND}(X^{(j)};q_j))
end{matrix}
}
end{equation*}
end{document}
answered 2 hours ago
egreg
705k8618763155
705k8618763155
add a comment |
add a comment |
Tarald Riise is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Tarald Riise is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Tarald Riise is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Tarald Riise is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f466089%2fmultiline-equation-with-some-characters-that-span-all-lines%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
What about insert the right contents in array with 2 rows?
– Sigur
3 hours ago