Am I supposed to assume the dot product here?












0














Let $W$ be a two-dimensional subspace of $mathbb{R}^3$, and consider the orthogonal projection $pi$ of $mathbb{R}^3$ onto $W$. Let $(a_i,b_i)^t$ be the coordinate vector of $pi(e_i)$, with respect to a chosen orthonormal basis of $W$. Prove that $(a_1,a_2,a_3)$ and $(b_1,b_2,b_3)$ are orthogonal unit vectors.



This specific question has already been answered on here, but it wasn't clear to me that I'm supposed to assume the form is the dot product and that $e_i$ form an orthonormal basis for $mathbb{R}^3$. Does the statement still hold true for a general symmetric form?










share|cite|improve this question






















  • Unless a specific other inner product is specified, when one talks about $Bbb R^n$, they mean with the canonical dot product. And unless a specific other definition is given for $e_i$, they mean the canonical basis. But the result does hold true for other inner products and other bases orthronormal with respect to the inner product.
    – Paul Sinclair
    Nov 24 at 15:10


















0














Let $W$ be a two-dimensional subspace of $mathbb{R}^3$, and consider the orthogonal projection $pi$ of $mathbb{R}^3$ onto $W$. Let $(a_i,b_i)^t$ be the coordinate vector of $pi(e_i)$, with respect to a chosen orthonormal basis of $W$. Prove that $(a_1,a_2,a_3)$ and $(b_1,b_2,b_3)$ are orthogonal unit vectors.



This specific question has already been answered on here, but it wasn't clear to me that I'm supposed to assume the form is the dot product and that $e_i$ form an orthonormal basis for $mathbb{R}^3$. Does the statement still hold true for a general symmetric form?










share|cite|improve this question






















  • Unless a specific other inner product is specified, when one talks about $Bbb R^n$, they mean with the canonical dot product. And unless a specific other definition is given for $e_i$, they mean the canonical basis. But the result does hold true for other inner products and other bases orthronormal with respect to the inner product.
    – Paul Sinclair
    Nov 24 at 15:10
















0












0








0







Let $W$ be a two-dimensional subspace of $mathbb{R}^3$, and consider the orthogonal projection $pi$ of $mathbb{R}^3$ onto $W$. Let $(a_i,b_i)^t$ be the coordinate vector of $pi(e_i)$, with respect to a chosen orthonormal basis of $W$. Prove that $(a_1,a_2,a_3)$ and $(b_1,b_2,b_3)$ are orthogonal unit vectors.



This specific question has already been answered on here, but it wasn't clear to me that I'm supposed to assume the form is the dot product and that $e_i$ form an orthonormal basis for $mathbb{R}^3$. Does the statement still hold true for a general symmetric form?










share|cite|improve this question













Let $W$ be a two-dimensional subspace of $mathbb{R}^3$, and consider the orthogonal projection $pi$ of $mathbb{R}^3$ onto $W$. Let $(a_i,b_i)^t$ be the coordinate vector of $pi(e_i)$, with respect to a chosen orthonormal basis of $W$. Prove that $(a_1,a_2,a_3)$ and $(b_1,b_2,b_3)$ are orthogonal unit vectors.



This specific question has already been answered on here, but it wasn't clear to me that I'm supposed to assume the form is the dot product and that $e_i$ form an orthonormal basis for $mathbb{R}^3$. Does the statement still hold true for a general symmetric form?







vector-spaces






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Nov 24 at 3:14









Miles Johnson

1928




1928












  • Unless a specific other inner product is specified, when one talks about $Bbb R^n$, they mean with the canonical dot product. And unless a specific other definition is given for $e_i$, they mean the canonical basis. But the result does hold true for other inner products and other bases orthronormal with respect to the inner product.
    – Paul Sinclair
    Nov 24 at 15:10




















  • Unless a specific other inner product is specified, when one talks about $Bbb R^n$, they mean with the canonical dot product. And unless a specific other definition is given for $e_i$, they mean the canonical basis. But the result does hold true for other inner products and other bases orthronormal with respect to the inner product.
    – Paul Sinclair
    Nov 24 at 15:10


















Unless a specific other inner product is specified, when one talks about $Bbb R^n$, they mean with the canonical dot product. And unless a specific other definition is given for $e_i$, they mean the canonical basis. But the result does hold true for other inner products and other bases orthronormal with respect to the inner product.
– Paul Sinclair
Nov 24 at 15:10






Unless a specific other inner product is specified, when one talks about $Bbb R^n$, they mean with the canonical dot product. And unless a specific other definition is given for $e_i$, they mean the canonical basis. But the result does hold true for other inner products and other bases orthronormal with respect to the inner product.
– Paul Sinclair
Nov 24 at 15:10

















active

oldest

votes











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3011132%2fam-i-supposed-to-assume-the-dot-product-here%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown






























active

oldest

votes













active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3011132%2fam-i-supposed-to-assume-the-dot-product-here%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Ellipse (mathématiques)

Quarter-circle Tiles

Mont Emei