Localization and p-adic completion of Integers coincide?












3














I want to know if $mathbb{Z}_{(p)}$ (localization by a prime ideal) and $mathbb{Z}_p$ (the completion of p-adic integers) are isomorphic. It seems true, but i don't know how to prove it. Does it holds for every PID?



Thanks.










share|cite|improve this question






















  • $mathbb{Z}_{(p)}$ is dense in $mathbb{Z}_p$ and in both $(p^n)$ are the only ideals
    – reuns
    Nov 24 at 2:40
















3














I want to know if $mathbb{Z}_{(p)}$ (localization by a prime ideal) and $mathbb{Z}_p$ (the completion of p-adic integers) are isomorphic. It seems true, but i don't know how to prove it. Does it holds for every PID?



Thanks.










share|cite|improve this question






















  • $mathbb{Z}_{(p)}$ is dense in $mathbb{Z}_p$ and in both $(p^n)$ are the only ideals
    – reuns
    Nov 24 at 2:40














3












3








3







I want to know if $mathbb{Z}_{(p)}$ (localization by a prime ideal) and $mathbb{Z}_p$ (the completion of p-adic integers) are isomorphic. It seems true, but i don't know how to prove it. Does it holds for every PID?



Thanks.










share|cite|improve this question













I want to know if $mathbb{Z}_{(p)}$ (localization by a prime ideal) and $mathbb{Z}_p$ (the completion of p-adic integers) are isomorphic. It seems true, but i don't know how to prove it. Does it holds for every PID?



Thanks.







number-theory commutative-algebra






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Nov 24 at 2:29









Elvis Torres Pérez

382




382












  • $mathbb{Z}_{(p)}$ is dense in $mathbb{Z}_p$ and in both $(p^n)$ are the only ideals
    – reuns
    Nov 24 at 2:40


















  • $mathbb{Z}_{(p)}$ is dense in $mathbb{Z}_p$ and in both $(p^n)$ are the only ideals
    – reuns
    Nov 24 at 2:40
















$mathbb{Z}_{(p)}$ is dense in $mathbb{Z}_p$ and in both $(p^n)$ are the only ideals
– reuns
Nov 24 at 2:40




$mathbb{Z}_{(p)}$ is dense in $mathbb{Z}_p$ and in both $(p^n)$ are the only ideals
– reuns
Nov 24 at 2:40










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















3














No, $mathbb{Z}_p$ is much larger than $mathbb{Z}_{(p)}$. Indeed, $mathbb{Z}_p$ is uncountable, since it has an element $sum a_np^n$ for any sequence of coefficients $a_nin{0,1,dots,p-1}$. On the other hand, $mathbb{Z}_{(p)}$ is a subring of $mathbb{Q}$ (the rationals with denominator not divisible by $p$), so it is countable.






share|cite|improve this answer





























    1














    $mathbb{Z}_{(p)}$ is a proper subring of $mathbb{Z}_{p}$, and the latter one is complete discrete valuation ring, but $mathbb{Z}_{(p)}$ is not complete (but still DVR with respect to the same valuation). However, if you take completion of $mathbb{Z}_{(p)}$ with respect to the $p$-adic norm, you get $mathbb{Z}_{p}$.






    share|cite|improve this answer





















      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      });
      });
      }, "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3011105%2flocalization-and-p-adic-completion-of-integers-coincide%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      3














      No, $mathbb{Z}_p$ is much larger than $mathbb{Z}_{(p)}$. Indeed, $mathbb{Z}_p$ is uncountable, since it has an element $sum a_np^n$ for any sequence of coefficients $a_nin{0,1,dots,p-1}$. On the other hand, $mathbb{Z}_{(p)}$ is a subring of $mathbb{Q}$ (the rationals with denominator not divisible by $p$), so it is countable.






      share|cite|improve this answer


























        3














        No, $mathbb{Z}_p$ is much larger than $mathbb{Z}_{(p)}$. Indeed, $mathbb{Z}_p$ is uncountable, since it has an element $sum a_np^n$ for any sequence of coefficients $a_nin{0,1,dots,p-1}$. On the other hand, $mathbb{Z}_{(p)}$ is a subring of $mathbb{Q}$ (the rationals with denominator not divisible by $p$), so it is countable.






        share|cite|improve this answer
























          3












          3








          3






          No, $mathbb{Z}_p$ is much larger than $mathbb{Z}_{(p)}$. Indeed, $mathbb{Z}_p$ is uncountable, since it has an element $sum a_np^n$ for any sequence of coefficients $a_nin{0,1,dots,p-1}$. On the other hand, $mathbb{Z}_{(p)}$ is a subring of $mathbb{Q}$ (the rationals with denominator not divisible by $p$), so it is countable.






          share|cite|improve this answer












          No, $mathbb{Z}_p$ is much larger than $mathbb{Z}_{(p)}$. Indeed, $mathbb{Z}_p$ is uncountable, since it has an element $sum a_np^n$ for any sequence of coefficients $a_nin{0,1,dots,p-1}$. On the other hand, $mathbb{Z}_{(p)}$ is a subring of $mathbb{Q}$ (the rationals with denominator not divisible by $p$), so it is countable.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Nov 24 at 2:32









          Eric Wofsey

          178k12202330




          178k12202330























              1














              $mathbb{Z}_{(p)}$ is a proper subring of $mathbb{Z}_{p}$, and the latter one is complete discrete valuation ring, but $mathbb{Z}_{(p)}$ is not complete (but still DVR with respect to the same valuation). However, if you take completion of $mathbb{Z}_{(p)}$ with respect to the $p$-adic norm, you get $mathbb{Z}_{p}$.






              share|cite|improve this answer


























                1














                $mathbb{Z}_{(p)}$ is a proper subring of $mathbb{Z}_{p}$, and the latter one is complete discrete valuation ring, but $mathbb{Z}_{(p)}$ is not complete (but still DVR with respect to the same valuation). However, if you take completion of $mathbb{Z}_{(p)}$ with respect to the $p$-adic norm, you get $mathbb{Z}_{p}$.






                share|cite|improve this answer
























                  1












                  1








                  1






                  $mathbb{Z}_{(p)}$ is a proper subring of $mathbb{Z}_{p}$, and the latter one is complete discrete valuation ring, but $mathbb{Z}_{(p)}$ is not complete (but still DVR with respect to the same valuation). However, if you take completion of $mathbb{Z}_{(p)}$ with respect to the $p$-adic norm, you get $mathbb{Z}_{p}$.






                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  $mathbb{Z}_{(p)}$ is a proper subring of $mathbb{Z}_{p}$, and the latter one is complete discrete valuation ring, but $mathbb{Z}_{(p)}$ is not complete (but still DVR with respect to the same valuation). However, if you take completion of $mathbb{Z}_{(p)}$ with respect to the $p$-adic norm, you get $mathbb{Z}_{p}$.







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered Nov 24 at 3:12









                  Seewoo Lee

                  6,110826




                  6,110826






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                      Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                      Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3011105%2flocalization-and-p-adic-completion-of-integers-coincide%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Quarter-circle Tiles

                      build a pushdown automaton that recognizes the reverse language of a given pushdown automaton?

                      Mont Emei