$A_n$ is the only subgroup of $S_n$ of index $2$.
up vote
23
down vote
favorite
How to prove that the only subgroup of the symmetric group $S_n$ of order $n!/2$ is $A_n$?
Why isn't there other possibility?
Thanks :)
group-theory finite-groups permutations symmetric-groups
add a comment |
up vote
23
down vote
favorite
How to prove that the only subgroup of the symmetric group $S_n$ of order $n!/2$ is $A_n$?
Why isn't there other possibility?
Thanks :)
group-theory finite-groups permutations symmetric-groups
4
Please make the body of your posts self-contained. The title is an indexing feature, and should not be an integral part of the message. Think of it as the title of a book on the spine; it's there to let people know what the post is about, not to impart information without which you cannot understand what is happening.
– Mariano Suárez-Álvarez
Mar 14 '11 at 21:00
I am terribly sorry. But I don't know how to reedit it.
– ShinyaSakai
Mar 14 '11 at 21:07
4
There should be a link below the [abstract algebra] tag that says "edit". Click it, and you can edit.
– Arturo Magidin
Mar 14 '11 at 21:11
add a comment |
up vote
23
down vote
favorite
up vote
23
down vote
favorite
How to prove that the only subgroup of the symmetric group $S_n$ of order $n!/2$ is $A_n$?
Why isn't there other possibility?
Thanks :)
group-theory finite-groups permutations symmetric-groups
How to prove that the only subgroup of the symmetric group $S_n$ of order $n!/2$ is $A_n$?
Why isn't there other possibility?
Thanks :)
group-theory finite-groups permutations symmetric-groups
group-theory finite-groups permutations symmetric-groups
edited Jan 29 '16 at 10:22
mrs
1
1
asked Mar 14 '11 at 20:57
ShinyaSakai
2,96012350
2,96012350
4
Please make the body of your posts self-contained. The title is an indexing feature, and should not be an integral part of the message. Think of it as the title of a book on the spine; it's there to let people know what the post is about, not to impart information without which you cannot understand what is happening.
– Mariano Suárez-Álvarez
Mar 14 '11 at 21:00
I am terribly sorry. But I don't know how to reedit it.
– ShinyaSakai
Mar 14 '11 at 21:07
4
There should be a link below the [abstract algebra] tag that says "edit". Click it, and you can edit.
– Arturo Magidin
Mar 14 '11 at 21:11
add a comment |
4
Please make the body of your posts self-contained. The title is an indexing feature, and should not be an integral part of the message. Think of it as the title of a book on the spine; it's there to let people know what the post is about, not to impart information without which you cannot understand what is happening.
– Mariano Suárez-Álvarez
Mar 14 '11 at 21:00
I am terribly sorry. But I don't know how to reedit it.
– ShinyaSakai
Mar 14 '11 at 21:07
4
There should be a link below the [abstract algebra] tag that says "edit". Click it, and you can edit.
– Arturo Magidin
Mar 14 '11 at 21:11
4
4
Please make the body of your posts self-contained. The title is an indexing feature, and should not be an integral part of the message. Think of it as the title of a book on the spine; it's there to let people know what the post is about, not to impart information without which you cannot understand what is happening.
– Mariano Suárez-Álvarez
Mar 14 '11 at 21:00
Please make the body of your posts self-contained. The title is an indexing feature, and should not be an integral part of the message. Think of it as the title of a book on the spine; it's there to let people know what the post is about, not to impart information without which you cannot understand what is happening.
– Mariano Suárez-Álvarez
Mar 14 '11 at 21:00
I am terribly sorry. But I don't know how to reedit it.
– ShinyaSakai
Mar 14 '11 at 21:07
I am terribly sorry. But I don't know how to reedit it.
– ShinyaSakai
Mar 14 '11 at 21:07
4
4
There should be a link below the [abstract algebra] tag that says "edit". Click it, and you can edit.
– Arturo Magidin
Mar 14 '11 at 21:11
There should be a link below the [abstract algebra] tag that says "edit". Click it, and you can edit.
– Arturo Magidin
Mar 14 '11 at 21:11
add a comment |
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
up vote
30
down vote
accepted
As mentioned by yoyo: if $Hsubset S_n$ is of index 2 then it is normal and $S_n/H$ is isomorphic to $C_2={1,-1}$. We thus have a surjective homomorphism $f:S_nto C_2$ with kernel $H$. All transpositions in $S_n$ are conjugate, hence $f(t)in C_2$ is the same element for every transposition $tin S_n$ (this uses the fact that $C_2$ is commutative). $S_n$ is generated by transpositions, therefore $C_2$ is generated by $f(t)$ (for any transposition $tin S_n$), therefore $f(t)=-1$, therefore ker $f=A_n$.
Very detailed~ thank you very much~
– ShinyaSakai
Mar 15 '11 at 21:28
$S_n$ in the last line, not $S_2$. Very nice solution.
– ReverseFlow
Sep 7 '14 at 23:41
@Genomeme: thanks, corrected
– user8268
Sep 8 '14 at 21:14
1
@user8268 Can you explain how $f(t)in C_2$ is the same element for every transposition $tin S_n$, and how $S_n$ is generated by transpositions? Thank you.
– jstnchng
Nov 30 '14 at 18:49
add a comment |
up vote
11
down vote
subgroups of index two are normal (exercise). $A_n$ is simple, $ngeq 5$ (exercise). if there were another subgroup $H$ of index two, then $Hcap A_n$ would be normal in $A_n$, contradiction.
It is really a smart shortcut for the special case of $n geq 5$~ Thank you very much~
– ShinyaSakai
Mar 15 '11 at 21:30
6
How do you know that the intersection is not trivial? {1} is normal in every group and does not contradict simplicity. There is a way around this using conjugacy in $S_n$......
– Vladhagen
Oct 30 '13 at 19:42
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
I realize this question is rather old, but if this comes from Hungerford's book, there is a specific way he wants us to solve this problem, so I am providing this for the benefit of those working through Hungerford. First, one must recall that subgroups of index $2$ are normal. Hungerford's suggestion is to use the following fact:
Let $r,s$ be distinct elements of ${1,2,...,n}$. Then $A_n$ ($n ge 3$) is generated by the $3$-cycles ${(rsk) ~|~ 1 le k le n, k ne r,s}$.
Keeping that in mind, we first prove the two easy facts about subgroups of index $2$
Lemma (1): If $H$ is a subgroup of index $2$ in $G$, then $H$ contains the square of every element in $G$.
Proof: Let $g in G$ be arbitrary. Then by Lagrange's theorem, $(gH)^2 = H$ or $g^2H=H$, happening if and only if $g^2 in H$.
Lemma (2): If $H$ is a subgroup of index $2$ in $G$, then $H$ contains all elements of odd order.
Proof: Suppose that $g in G$ is a element of order $2k+1$ for some $k in mathbb{N}$. Then $H = g^{2k+1}H = gH cdot (g^2)^k H = gH$, where $(g^2)^k H = H$ by lemma (1). This, of course, means $g in H$.
From these two lemmas, I think it is pretty clear how one ought to use the given fact: if $H le S_n$ were a subgroup of index $2$, then it would consist of all $3$-cycles, since they have odd order. But by closure this means that $A_n le H$. Since they have the same index, they must also have the same order, implying that they are equal because we are dealing with finite sets.
How do 3-cycles have an odd order? Or were you referring to something else?
– Tomás Palamás
Oct 30 at 20:14
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Other Way :
$A_n$ is generated by all 3 cycles in $S_n$
If $Hneq A_n$ and $|S_n:H|=2$ then atleast one 3 cycle not in H.
WLOG assume say $(123)notin H$ so $H,(123)H,(132)H$ are 3 distant cosets which is contradiction to fact that H hads index 2
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f27024%2fa-n-is-the-only-subgroup-of-s-n-of-index-2%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
30
down vote
accepted
As mentioned by yoyo: if $Hsubset S_n$ is of index 2 then it is normal and $S_n/H$ is isomorphic to $C_2={1,-1}$. We thus have a surjective homomorphism $f:S_nto C_2$ with kernel $H$. All transpositions in $S_n$ are conjugate, hence $f(t)in C_2$ is the same element for every transposition $tin S_n$ (this uses the fact that $C_2$ is commutative). $S_n$ is generated by transpositions, therefore $C_2$ is generated by $f(t)$ (for any transposition $tin S_n$), therefore $f(t)=-1$, therefore ker $f=A_n$.
Very detailed~ thank you very much~
– ShinyaSakai
Mar 15 '11 at 21:28
$S_n$ in the last line, not $S_2$. Very nice solution.
– ReverseFlow
Sep 7 '14 at 23:41
@Genomeme: thanks, corrected
– user8268
Sep 8 '14 at 21:14
1
@user8268 Can you explain how $f(t)in C_2$ is the same element for every transposition $tin S_n$, and how $S_n$ is generated by transpositions? Thank you.
– jstnchng
Nov 30 '14 at 18:49
add a comment |
up vote
30
down vote
accepted
As mentioned by yoyo: if $Hsubset S_n$ is of index 2 then it is normal and $S_n/H$ is isomorphic to $C_2={1,-1}$. We thus have a surjective homomorphism $f:S_nto C_2$ with kernel $H$. All transpositions in $S_n$ are conjugate, hence $f(t)in C_2$ is the same element for every transposition $tin S_n$ (this uses the fact that $C_2$ is commutative). $S_n$ is generated by transpositions, therefore $C_2$ is generated by $f(t)$ (for any transposition $tin S_n$), therefore $f(t)=-1$, therefore ker $f=A_n$.
Very detailed~ thank you very much~
– ShinyaSakai
Mar 15 '11 at 21:28
$S_n$ in the last line, not $S_2$. Very nice solution.
– ReverseFlow
Sep 7 '14 at 23:41
@Genomeme: thanks, corrected
– user8268
Sep 8 '14 at 21:14
1
@user8268 Can you explain how $f(t)in C_2$ is the same element for every transposition $tin S_n$, and how $S_n$ is generated by transpositions? Thank you.
– jstnchng
Nov 30 '14 at 18:49
add a comment |
up vote
30
down vote
accepted
up vote
30
down vote
accepted
As mentioned by yoyo: if $Hsubset S_n$ is of index 2 then it is normal and $S_n/H$ is isomorphic to $C_2={1,-1}$. We thus have a surjective homomorphism $f:S_nto C_2$ with kernel $H$. All transpositions in $S_n$ are conjugate, hence $f(t)in C_2$ is the same element for every transposition $tin S_n$ (this uses the fact that $C_2$ is commutative). $S_n$ is generated by transpositions, therefore $C_2$ is generated by $f(t)$ (for any transposition $tin S_n$), therefore $f(t)=-1$, therefore ker $f=A_n$.
As mentioned by yoyo: if $Hsubset S_n$ is of index 2 then it is normal and $S_n/H$ is isomorphic to $C_2={1,-1}$. We thus have a surjective homomorphism $f:S_nto C_2$ with kernel $H$. All transpositions in $S_n$ are conjugate, hence $f(t)in C_2$ is the same element for every transposition $tin S_n$ (this uses the fact that $C_2$ is commutative). $S_n$ is generated by transpositions, therefore $C_2$ is generated by $f(t)$ (for any transposition $tin S_n$), therefore $f(t)=-1$, therefore ker $f=A_n$.
edited Sep 8 '14 at 21:14
answered Mar 14 '11 at 23:01
user8268
16.7k12746
16.7k12746
Very detailed~ thank you very much~
– ShinyaSakai
Mar 15 '11 at 21:28
$S_n$ in the last line, not $S_2$. Very nice solution.
– ReverseFlow
Sep 7 '14 at 23:41
@Genomeme: thanks, corrected
– user8268
Sep 8 '14 at 21:14
1
@user8268 Can you explain how $f(t)in C_2$ is the same element for every transposition $tin S_n$, and how $S_n$ is generated by transpositions? Thank you.
– jstnchng
Nov 30 '14 at 18:49
add a comment |
Very detailed~ thank you very much~
– ShinyaSakai
Mar 15 '11 at 21:28
$S_n$ in the last line, not $S_2$. Very nice solution.
– ReverseFlow
Sep 7 '14 at 23:41
@Genomeme: thanks, corrected
– user8268
Sep 8 '14 at 21:14
1
@user8268 Can you explain how $f(t)in C_2$ is the same element for every transposition $tin S_n$, and how $S_n$ is generated by transpositions? Thank you.
– jstnchng
Nov 30 '14 at 18:49
Very detailed~ thank you very much~
– ShinyaSakai
Mar 15 '11 at 21:28
Very detailed~ thank you very much~
– ShinyaSakai
Mar 15 '11 at 21:28
$S_n$ in the last line, not $S_2$. Very nice solution.
– ReverseFlow
Sep 7 '14 at 23:41
$S_n$ in the last line, not $S_2$. Very nice solution.
– ReverseFlow
Sep 7 '14 at 23:41
@Genomeme: thanks, corrected
– user8268
Sep 8 '14 at 21:14
@Genomeme: thanks, corrected
– user8268
Sep 8 '14 at 21:14
1
1
@user8268 Can you explain how $f(t)in C_2$ is the same element for every transposition $tin S_n$, and how $S_n$ is generated by transpositions? Thank you.
– jstnchng
Nov 30 '14 at 18:49
@user8268 Can you explain how $f(t)in C_2$ is the same element for every transposition $tin S_n$, and how $S_n$ is generated by transpositions? Thank you.
– jstnchng
Nov 30 '14 at 18:49
add a comment |
up vote
11
down vote
subgroups of index two are normal (exercise). $A_n$ is simple, $ngeq 5$ (exercise). if there were another subgroup $H$ of index two, then $Hcap A_n$ would be normal in $A_n$, contradiction.
It is really a smart shortcut for the special case of $n geq 5$~ Thank you very much~
– ShinyaSakai
Mar 15 '11 at 21:30
6
How do you know that the intersection is not trivial? {1} is normal in every group and does not contradict simplicity. There is a way around this using conjugacy in $S_n$......
– Vladhagen
Oct 30 '13 at 19:42
add a comment |
up vote
11
down vote
subgroups of index two are normal (exercise). $A_n$ is simple, $ngeq 5$ (exercise). if there were another subgroup $H$ of index two, then $Hcap A_n$ would be normal in $A_n$, contradiction.
It is really a smart shortcut for the special case of $n geq 5$~ Thank you very much~
– ShinyaSakai
Mar 15 '11 at 21:30
6
How do you know that the intersection is not trivial? {1} is normal in every group and does not contradict simplicity. There is a way around this using conjugacy in $S_n$......
– Vladhagen
Oct 30 '13 at 19:42
add a comment |
up vote
11
down vote
up vote
11
down vote
subgroups of index two are normal (exercise). $A_n$ is simple, $ngeq 5$ (exercise). if there were another subgroup $H$ of index two, then $Hcap A_n$ would be normal in $A_n$, contradiction.
subgroups of index two are normal (exercise). $A_n$ is simple, $ngeq 5$ (exercise). if there were another subgroup $H$ of index two, then $Hcap A_n$ would be normal in $A_n$, contradiction.
answered Mar 14 '11 at 21:08
yoyo
6,5091626
6,5091626
It is really a smart shortcut for the special case of $n geq 5$~ Thank you very much~
– ShinyaSakai
Mar 15 '11 at 21:30
6
How do you know that the intersection is not trivial? {1} is normal in every group and does not contradict simplicity. There is a way around this using conjugacy in $S_n$......
– Vladhagen
Oct 30 '13 at 19:42
add a comment |
It is really a smart shortcut for the special case of $n geq 5$~ Thank you very much~
– ShinyaSakai
Mar 15 '11 at 21:30
6
How do you know that the intersection is not trivial? {1} is normal in every group and does not contradict simplicity. There is a way around this using conjugacy in $S_n$......
– Vladhagen
Oct 30 '13 at 19:42
It is really a smart shortcut for the special case of $n geq 5$~ Thank you very much~
– ShinyaSakai
Mar 15 '11 at 21:30
It is really a smart shortcut for the special case of $n geq 5$~ Thank you very much~
– ShinyaSakai
Mar 15 '11 at 21:30
6
6
How do you know that the intersection is not trivial? {1} is normal in every group and does not contradict simplicity. There is a way around this using conjugacy in $S_n$......
– Vladhagen
Oct 30 '13 at 19:42
How do you know that the intersection is not trivial? {1} is normal in every group and does not contradict simplicity. There is a way around this using conjugacy in $S_n$......
– Vladhagen
Oct 30 '13 at 19:42
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
I realize this question is rather old, but if this comes from Hungerford's book, there is a specific way he wants us to solve this problem, so I am providing this for the benefit of those working through Hungerford. First, one must recall that subgroups of index $2$ are normal. Hungerford's suggestion is to use the following fact:
Let $r,s$ be distinct elements of ${1,2,...,n}$. Then $A_n$ ($n ge 3$) is generated by the $3$-cycles ${(rsk) ~|~ 1 le k le n, k ne r,s}$.
Keeping that in mind, we first prove the two easy facts about subgroups of index $2$
Lemma (1): If $H$ is a subgroup of index $2$ in $G$, then $H$ contains the square of every element in $G$.
Proof: Let $g in G$ be arbitrary. Then by Lagrange's theorem, $(gH)^2 = H$ or $g^2H=H$, happening if and only if $g^2 in H$.
Lemma (2): If $H$ is a subgroup of index $2$ in $G$, then $H$ contains all elements of odd order.
Proof: Suppose that $g in G$ is a element of order $2k+1$ for some $k in mathbb{N}$. Then $H = g^{2k+1}H = gH cdot (g^2)^k H = gH$, where $(g^2)^k H = H$ by lemma (1). This, of course, means $g in H$.
From these two lemmas, I think it is pretty clear how one ought to use the given fact: if $H le S_n$ were a subgroup of index $2$, then it would consist of all $3$-cycles, since they have odd order. But by closure this means that $A_n le H$. Since they have the same index, they must also have the same order, implying that they are equal because we are dealing with finite sets.
How do 3-cycles have an odd order? Or were you referring to something else?
– Tomás Palamás
Oct 30 at 20:14
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
I realize this question is rather old, but if this comes from Hungerford's book, there is a specific way he wants us to solve this problem, so I am providing this for the benefit of those working through Hungerford. First, one must recall that subgroups of index $2$ are normal. Hungerford's suggestion is to use the following fact:
Let $r,s$ be distinct elements of ${1,2,...,n}$. Then $A_n$ ($n ge 3$) is generated by the $3$-cycles ${(rsk) ~|~ 1 le k le n, k ne r,s}$.
Keeping that in mind, we first prove the two easy facts about subgroups of index $2$
Lemma (1): If $H$ is a subgroup of index $2$ in $G$, then $H$ contains the square of every element in $G$.
Proof: Let $g in G$ be arbitrary. Then by Lagrange's theorem, $(gH)^2 = H$ or $g^2H=H$, happening if and only if $g^2 in H$.
Lemma (2): If $H$ is a subgroup of index $2$ in $G$, then $H$ contains all elements of odd order.
Proof: Suppose that $g in G$ is a element of order $2k+1$ for some $k in mathbb{N}$. Then $H = g^{2k+1}H = gH cdot (g^2)^k H = gH$, where $(g^2)^k H = H$ by lemma (1). This, of course, means $g in H$.
From these two lemmas, I think it is pretty clear how one ought to use the given fact: if $H le S_n$ were a subgroup of index $2$, then it would consist of all $3$-cycles, since they have odd order. But by closure this means that $A_n le H$. Since they have the same index, they must also have the same order, implying that they are equal because we are dealing with finite sets.
How do 3-cycles have an odd order? Or were you referring to something else?
– Tomás Palamás
Oct 30 at 20:14
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
up vote
2
down vote
I realize this question is rather old, but if this comes from Hungerford's book, there is a specific way he wants us to solve this problem, so I am providing this for the benefit of those working through Hungerford. First, one must recall that subgroups of index $2$ are normal. Hungerford's suggestion is to use the following fact:
Let $r,s$ be distinct elements of ${1,2,...,n}$. Then $A_n$ ($n ge 3$) is generated by the $3$-cycles ${(rsk) ~|~ 1 le k le n, k ne r,s}$.
Keeping that in mind, we first prove the two easy facts about subgroups of index $2$
Lemma (1): If $H$ is a subgroup of index $2$ in $G$, then $H$ contains the square of every element in $G$.
Proof: Let $g in G$ be arbitrary. Then by Lagrange's theorem, $(gH)^2 = H$ or $g^2H=H$, happening if and only if $g^2 in H$.
Lemma (2): If $H$ is a subgroup of index $2$ in $G$, then $H$ contains all elements of odd order.
Proof: Suppose that $g in G$ is a element of order $2k+1$ for some $k in mathbb{N}$. Then $H = g^{2k+1}H = gH cdot (g^2)^k H = gH$, where $(g^2)^k H = H$ by lemma (1). This, of course, means $g in H$.
From these two lemmas, I think it is pretty clear how one ought to use the given fact: if $H le S_n$ were a subgroup of index $2$, then it would consist of all $3$-cycles, since they have odd order. But by closure this means that $A_n le H$. Since they have the same index, they must also have the same order, implying that they are equal because we are dealing with finite sets.
I realize this question is rather old, but if this comes from Hungerford's book, there is a specific way he wants us to solve this problem, so I am providing this for the benefit of those working through Hungerford. First, one must recall that subgroups of index $2$ are normal. Hungerford's suggestion is to use the following fact:
Let $r,s$ be distinct elements of ${1,2,...,n}$. Then $A_n$ ($n ge 3$) is generated by the $3$-cycles ${(rsk) ~|~ 1 le k le n, k ne r,s}$.
Keeping that in mind, we first prove the two easy facts about subgroups of index $2$
Lemma (1): If $H$ is a subgroup of index $2$ in $G$, then $H$ contains the square of every element in $G$.
Proof: Let $g in G$ be arbitrary. Then by Lagrange's theorem, $(gH)^2 = H$ or $g^2H=H$, happening if and only if $g^2 in H$.
Lemma (2): If $H$ is a subgroup of index $2$ in $G$, then $H$ contains all elements of odd order.
Proof: Suppose that $g in G$ is a element of order $2k+1$ for some $k in mathbb{N}$. Then $H = g^{2k+1}H = gH cdot (g^2)^k H = gH$, where $(g^2)^k H = H$ by lemma (1). This, of course, means $g in H$.
From these two lemmas, I think it is pretty clear how one ought to use the given fact: if $H le S_n$ were a subgroup of index $2$, then it would consist of all $3$-cycles, since they have odd order. But by closure this means that $A_n le H$. Since they have the same index, they must also have the same order, implying that they are equal because we are dealing with finite sets.
edited May 3 '17 at 18:23
answered May 3 '17 at 18:09
user193319
2,3122923
2,3122923
How do 3-cycles have an odd order? Or were you referring to something else?
– Tomás Palamás
Oct 30 at 20:14
add a comment |
How do 3-cycles have an odd order? Or were you referring to something else?
– Tomás Palamás
Oct 30 at 20:14
How do 3-cycles have an odd order? Or were you referring to something else?
– Tomás Palamás
Oct 30 at 20:14
How do 3-cycles have an odd order? Or were you referring to something else?
– Tomás Palamás
Oct 30 at 20:14
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Other Way :
$A_n$ is generated by all 3 cycles in $S_n$
If $Hneq A_n$ and $|S_n:H|=2$ then atleast one 3 cycle not in H.
WLOG assume say $(123)notin H$ so $H,(123)H,(132)H$ are 3 distant cosets which is contradiction to fact that H hads index 2
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Other Way :
$A_n$ is generated by all 3 cycles in $S_n$
If $Hneq A_n$ and $|S_n:H|=2$ then atleast one 3 cycle not in H.
WLOG assume say $(123)notin H$ so $H,(123)H,(132)H$ are 3 distant cosets which is contradiction to fact that H hads index 2
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
Other Way :
$A_n$ is generated by all 3 cycles in $S_n$
If $Hneq A_n$ and $|S_n:H|=2$ then atleast one 3 cycle not in H.
WLOG assume say $(123)notin H$ so $H,(123)H,(132)H$ are 3 distant cosets which is contradiction to fact that H hads index 2
Other Way :
$A_n$ is generated by all 3 cycles in $S_n$
If $Hneq A_n$ and $|S_n:H|=2$ then atleast one 3 cycle not in H.
WLOG assume say $(123)notin H$ so $H,(123)H,(132)H$ are 3 distant cosets which is contradiction to fact that H hads index 2
answered Nov 21 at 15:24
Shubham
1,5941519
1,5941519
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f27024%2fa-n-is-the-only-subgroup-of-s-n-of-index-2%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
4
Please make the body of your posts self-contained. The title is an indexing feature, and should not be an integral part of the message. Think of it as the title of a book on the spine; it's there to let people know what the post is about, not to impart information without which you cannot understand what is happening.
– Mariano Suárez-Álvarez
Mar 14 '11 at 21:00
I am terribly sorry. But I don't know how to reedit it.
– ShinyaSakai
Mar 14 '11 at 21:07
4
There should be a link below the [abstract algebra] tag that says "edit". Click it, and you can edit.
– Arturo Magidin
Mar 14 '11 at 21:11