Calculate path length of solution to differential equation











up vote
2
down vote

favorite
1












Suppose I have a parameterized path $gamma:[0,infty)rightarrowmathbb C$ with initial condition $gamma(0)=1$ and which satisfies the following:
$$gamma'(t)=frac{i-1}{sqrt{2}}frac{gamma(t)}{|gamma(t)|}$$
In other words, $gamma(t)$ is always moving at constant unit speed towards its rotation in the plane by $pi/2$. I found computationally that
$$lim_{trightarrowinfty}gamma(t)=0$$



Questions:




  1. Is there a formula for $gamma(t)$?


  2. Does $gamma$ reach the origin in finite time? In other words, does there exist $T<infty$ such that $lim_{trightarrow T}gamma(t)=0$?



Edit: Without loss of generality set $s=1/sqrt{2}$ so that $gamma'(t)$ has unit magnitude. Also I realize that the path length $int_0^infty|gamma'(t)|dt$ must be infinite since $|gamma'(t)|$ is constant.










share|cite|improve this question




























    up vote
    2
    down vote

    favorite
    1












    Suppose I have a parameterized path $gamma:[0,infty)rightarrowmathbb C$ with initial condition $gamma(0)=1$ and which satisfies the following:
    $$gamma'(t)=frac{i-1}{sqrt{2}}frac{gamma(t)}{|gamma(t)|}$$
    In other words, $gamma(t)$ is always moving at constant unit speed towards its rotation in the plane by $pi/2$. I found computationally that
    $$lim_{trightarrowinfty}gamma(t)=0$$



    Questions:




    1. Is there a formula for $gamma(t)$?


    2. Does $gamma$ reach the origin in finite time? In other words, does there exist $T<infty$ such that $lim_{trightarrow T}gamma(t)=0$?



    Edit: Without loss of generality set $s=1/sqrt{2}$ so that $gamma'(t)$ has unit magnitude. Also I realize that the path length $int_0^infty|gamma'(t)|dt$ must be infinite since $|gamma'(t)|$ is constant.










    share|cite|improve this question


























      up vote
      2
      down vote

      favorite
      1









      up vote
      2
      down vote

      favorite
      1






      1





      Suppose I have a parameterized path $gamma:[0,infty)rightarrowmathbb C$ with initial condition $gamma(0)=1$ and which satisfies the following:
      $$gamma'(t)=frac{i-1}{sqrt{2}}frac{gamma(t)}{|gamma(t)|}$$
      In other words, $gamma(t)$ is always moving at constant unit speed towards its rotation in the plane by $pi/2$. I found computationally that
      $$lim_{trightarrowinfty}gamma(t)=0$$



      Questions:




      1. Is there a formula for $gamma(t)$?


      2. Does $gamma$ reach the origin in finite time? In other words, does there exist $T<infty$ such that $lim_{trightarrow T}gamma(t)=0$?



      Edit: Without loss of generality set $s=1/sqrt{2}$ so that $gamma'(t)$ has unit magnitude. Also I realize that the path length $int_0^infty|gamma'(t)|dt$ must be infinite since $|gamma'(t)|$ is constant.










      share|cite|improve this question















      Suppose I have a parameterized path $gamma:[0,infty)rightarrowmathbb C$ with initial condition $gamma(0)=1$ and which satisfies the following:
      $$gamma'(t)=frac{i-1}{sqrt{2}}frac{gamma(t)}{|gamma(t)|}$$
      In other words, $gamma(t)$ is always moving at constant unit speed towards its rotation in the plane by $pi/2$. I found computationally that
      $$lim_{trightarrowinfty}gamma(t)=0$$



      Questions:




      1. Is there a formula for $gamma(t)$?


      2. Does $gamma$ reach the origin in finite time? In other words, does there exist $T<infty$ such that $lim_{trightarrow T}gamma(t)=0$?



      Edit: Without loss of generality set $s=1/sqrt{2}$ so that $gamma'(t)$ has unit magnitude. Also I realize that the path length $int_0^infty|gamma'(t)|dt$ must be infinite since $|gamma'(t)|$ is constant.







      differential-equations






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited 17 hours ago

























      asked 22 hours ago









      M. Nestor

      71710




      71710






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          5
          down vote













          It appears that this equation can be well-addressed via a transformation to polar coordinates; in polars, we write



          $gamma(t) = r(t)e^{itheta(t)}; tag 1$



          then



          $dot gamma = dot r e^{itheta} + r i dot theta e^{itheta}; tag 2$



          also,



          $vert gamma vert = r, tag 3$



          whence



          $dfrac{gamma}{vert gamma vert} = e^{itheta}; tag 4$



          assembling all this into the given equation



          $dot gamma = s(i - 1) dfrac{gamma}{vert gamma vert} tag 5$



          yields



          $dot r e^{itheta} + r i dot theta e^{itheta} = s(i - 1) e^{itheta}; tag 6$



          we divide out $e^{itheta}$:



          $dot r + ridot theta = s(i - 1) = -s + is; tag 7$



          equating real and imaginary parts,



          $dot r = -s, tag 8$



          $ridot theta = is; tag 9$



          $rdot theta = s; tag{10}$



          we may easily integrate (8) 'twixt $t_0$ and $t$, assuming $r(t_0) = r_0$:



          $r - r_0 = -s(t - t_0), tag{11}$



          $r = r_0 - s(t - t_0); tag{12}$



          we observe that the coordinate constraint $r > 0$, along with the condition $s > 0$, implies that $t$ must remain less than $r_0/s + t_0$; we shall soon find that the polar solution circumvents this limit on $t$; inserting (12) into (10):



          $(r_0 - s(t - t_0))dot theta = s; tag{13}$



          $dot theta = dfrac{s}{r_0 - s(t - t_0)}, tag{14}$



          which is also easily integrated 'twixt $t_0$ and $t$:



          $theta - theta_0 = -ln(r_0 - s(t - t_0)) + ln r_0; tag{15}$



          $theta = theta_0 - ln(r_0 - s(t - t_0)) + ln r_0; tag{16}$



          using (12), we may express $r$ in term of $theta$:



          $theta = theta_0 - ln r + ln r_0; tag{17}$



          $e^theta = e^{theta_0} dfrac{r_0}{r}; tag{18}$



          $r = r_0 e^{theta_0 - theta}; tag{19}$



          the above presents the general solution for $t = t_0$, $r(t_0) = r_0$, $theta(t_0) = theta_0$; we specialize to the case at hand:



          $t_0 = 0, ; gamma(0) = 1 + i; tag{20}$



          $r_0 = vert gamma(0) vert = sqrt 2; tag{21}$



          $theta_0 = dfrac{pi}{4}; tag{22}$



          from (19):



          $r = sqrt 2 e^{pi/4 - theta}; tag{23}$



          from (12) and (16):



          $r(t) = sqrt 2 - st; tag{24}$



          $theta(t) = dfrac{pi}{4} - ln(sqrt 2 - s(t - t_0)) + ln sqrt 2. tag{25}$



          The path length is perhaps easiest found by returning to the expressions for $r(t)$ and $theta(t)$, in terms of which



          $vert dot gamma vert = sqrt{ (dot r)^2 + r^2 (dot theta)^2} = sqrt{s^2 + s^2} = sqrt 2 s; tag{26}$



          since $t$ is restricted to $[0, r_0/s]$, the length of the curve is



          $displaystyle int_0^{r_0/s} vert dot gamma vert ; dt = displaystyle int_0^{r_0/s} sqrt 2 s ; dt = sqrt 2 r_0. tag{27}$






          share|cite|improve this answer



















          • 1




            Thanks! I see that $r=sqrt{2}exp(pi/4-theta)$ for $thetageqpi/4$ is a good polar expression for this curve. However this curve never reaches the origin, but $r(t)=sqrt{2}-st$ on line 24 seems to imply $r=0$ for $t=sqrt{2}/s$. Does the image of $tin[0,sqrt{2}/s)$ under $gamma$ contain the entire curve?
            – M. Nestor
            18 hours ago












          • @M.Nestor: well, a quick answer which I think adequate is that the polar coordinate system isn't really defined at $r = 0$, so we should really say $t < sqrt 2 / s$. I should probably edit that part of my answer.
            – Robert Lewis
            18 hours ago








          • 1




            @M.Nestor: you should be able to get answers to your edited question by taking $s = 1/sqrt 2$ in mine,
            – Robert Lewis
            18 hours ago











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3031948%2fcalculate-path-length-of-solution-to-differential-equation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          5
          down vote













          It appears that this equation can be well-addressed via a transformation to polar coordinates; in polars, we write



          $gamma(t) = r(t)e^{itheta(t)}; tag 1$



          then



          $dot gamma = dot r e^{itheta} + r i dot theta e^{itheta}; tag 2$



          also,



          $vert gamma vert = r, tag 3$



          whence



          $dfrac{gamma}{vert gamma vert} = e^{itheta}; tag 4$



          assembling all this into the given equation



          $dot gamma = s(i - 1) dfrac{gamma}{vert gamma vert} tag 5$



          yields



          $dot r e^{itheta} + r i dot theta e^{itheta} = s(i - 1) e^{itheta}; tag 6$



          we divide out $e^{itheta}$:



          $dot r + ridot theta = s(i - 1) = -s + is; tag 7$



          equating real and imaginary parts,



          $dot r = -s, tag 8$



          $ridot theta = is; tag 9$



          $rdot theta = s; tag{10}$



          we may easily integrate (8) 'twixt $t_0$ and $t$, assuming $r(t_0) = r_0$:



          $r - r_0 = -s(t - t_0), tag{11}$



          $r = r_0 - s(t - t_0); tag{12}$



          we observe that the coordinate constraint $r > 0$, along with the condition $s > 0$, implies that $t$ must remain less than $r_0/s + t_0$; we shall soon find that the polar solution circumvents this limit on $t$; inserting (12) into (10):



          $(r_0 - s(t - t_0))dot theta = s; tag{13}$



          $dot theta = dfrac{s}{r_0 - s(t - t_0)}, tag{14}$



          which is also easily integrated 'twixt $t_0$ and $t$:



          $theta - theta_0 = -ln(r_0 - s(t - t_0)) + ln r_0; tag{15}$



          $theta = theta_0 - ln(r_0 - s(t - t_0)) + ln r_0; tag{16}$



          using (12), we may express $r$ in term of $theta$:



          $theta = theta_0 - ln r + ln r_0; tag{17}$



          $e^theta = e^{theta_0} dfrac{r_0}{r}; tag{18}$



          $r = r_0 e^{theta_0 - theta}; tag{19}$



          the above presents the general solution for $t = t_0$, $r(t_0) = r_0$, $theta(t_0) = theta_0$; we specialize to the case at hand:



          $t_0 = 0, ; gamma(0) = 1 + i; tag{20}$



          $r_0 = vert gamma(0) vert = sqrt 2; tag{21}$



          $theta_0 = dfrac{pi}{4}; tag{22}$



          from (19):



          $r = sqrt 2 e^{pi/4 - theta}; tag{23}$



          from (12) and (16):



          $r(t) = sqrt 2 - st; tag{24}$



          $theta(t) = dfrac{pi}{4} - ln(sqrt 2 - s(t - t_0)) + ln sqrt 2. tag{25}$



          The path length is perhaps easiest found by returning to the expressions for $r(t)$ and $theta(t)$, in terms of which



          $vert dot gamma vert = sqrt{ (dot r)^2 + r^2 (dot theta)^2} = sqrt{s^2 + s^2} = sqrt 2 s; tag{26}$



          since $t$ is restricted to $[0, r_0/s]$, the length of the curve is



          $displaystyle int_0^{r_0/s} vert dot gamma vert ; dt = displaystyle int_0^{r_0/s} sqrt 2 s ; dt = sqrt 2 r_0. tag{27}$






          share|cite|improve this answer



















          • 1




            Thanks! I see that $r=sqrt{2}exp(pi/4-theta)$ for $thetageqpi/4$ is a good polar expression for this curve. However this curve never reaches the origin, but $r(t)=sqrt{2}-st$ on line 24 seems to imply $r=0$ for $t=sqrt{2}/s$. Does the image of $tin[0,sqrt{2}/s)$ under $gamma$ contain the entire curve?
            – M. Nestor
            18 hours ago












          • @M.Nestor: well, a quick answer which I think adequate is that the polar coordinate system isn't really defined at $r = 0$, so we should really say $t < sqrt 2 / s$. I should probably edit that part of my answer.
            – Robert Lewis
            18 hours ago








          • 1




            @M.Nestor: you should be able to get answers to your edited question by taking $s = 1/sqrt 2$ in mine,
            – Robert Lewis
            18 hours ago















          up vote
          5
          down vote













          It appears that this equation can be well-addressed via a transformation to polar coordinates; in polars, we write



          $gamma(t) = r(t)e^{itheta(t)}; tag 1$



          then



          $dot gamma = dot r e^{itheta} + r i dot theta e^{itheta}; tag 2$



          also,



          $vert gamma vert = r, tag 3$



          whence



          $dfrac{gamma}{vert gamma vert} = e^{itheta}; tag 4$



          assembling all this into the given equation



          $dot gamma = s(i - 1) dfrac{gamma}{vert gamma vert} tag 5$



          yields



          $dot r e^{itheta} + r i dot theta e^{itheta} = s(i - 1) e^{itheta}; tag 6$



          we divide out $e^{itheta}$:



          $dot r + ridot theta = s(i - 1) = -s + is; tag 7$



          equating real and imaginary parts,



          $dot r = -s, tag 8$



          $ridot theta = is; tag 9$



          $rdot theta = s; tag{10}$



          we may easily integrate (8) 'twixt $t_0$ and $t$, assuming $r(t_0) = r_0$:



          $r - r_0 = -s(t - t_0), tag{11}$



          $r = r_0 - s(t - t_0); tag{12}$



          we observe that the coordinate constraint $r > 0$, along with the condition $s > 0$, implies that $t$ must remain less than $r_0/s + t_0$; we shall soon find that the polar solution circumvents this limit on $t$; inserting (12) into (10):



          $(r_0 - s(t - t_0))dot theta = s; tag{13}$



          $dot theta = dfrac{s}{r_0 - s(t - t_0)}, tag{14}$



          which is also easily integrated 'twixt $t_0$ and $t$:



          $theta - theta_0 = -ln(r_0 - s(t - t_0)) + ln r_0; tag{15}$



          $theta = theta_0 - ln(r_0 - s(t - t_0)) + ln r_0; tag{16}$



          using (12), we may express $r$ in term of $theta$:



          $theta = theta_0 - ln r + ln r_0; tag{17}$



          $e^theta = e^{theta_0} dfrac{r_0}{r}; tag{18}$



          $r = r_0 e^{theta_0 - theta}; tag{19}$



          the above presents the general solution for $t = t_0$, $r(t_0) = r_0$, $theta(t_0) = theta_0$; we specialize to the case at hand:



          $t_0 = 0, ; gamma(0) = 1 + i; tag{20}$



          $r_0 = vert gamma(0) vert = sqrt 2; tag{21}$



          $theta_0 = dfrac{pi}{4}; tag{22}$



          from (19):



          $r = sqrt 2 e^{pi/4 - theta}; tag{23}$



          from (12) and (16):



          $r(t) = sqrt 2 - st; tag{24}$



          $theta(t) = dfrac{pi}{4} - ln(sqrt 2 - s(t - t_0)) + ln sqrt 2. tag{25}$



          The path length is perhaps easiest found by returning to the expressions for $r(t)$ and $theta(t)$, in terms of which



          $vert dot gamma vert = sqrt{ (dot r)^2 + r^2 (dot theta)^2} = sqrt{s^2 + s^2} = sqrt 2 s; tag{26}$



          since $t$ is restricted to $[0, r_0/s]$, the length of the curve is



          $displaystyle int_0^{r_0/s} vert dot gamma vert ; dt = displaystyle int_0^{r_0/s} sqrt 2 s ; dt = sqrt 2 r_0. tag{27}$






          share|cite|improve this answer



















          • 1




            Thanks! I see that $r=sqrt{2}exp(pi/4-theta)$ for $thetageqpi/4$ is a good polar expression for this curve. However this curve never reaches the origin, but $r(t)=sqrt{2}-st$ on line 24 seems to imply $r=0$ for $t=sqrt{2}/s$. Does the image of $tin[0,sqrt{2}/s)$ under $gamma$ contain the entire curve?
            – M. Nestor
            18 hours ago












          • @M.Nestor: well, a quick answer which I think adequate is that the polar coordinate system isn't really defined at $r = 0$, so we should really say $t < sqrt 2 / s$. I should probably edit that part of my answer.
            – Robert Lewis
            18 hours ago








          • 1




            @M.Nestor: you should be able to get answers to your edited question by taking $s = 1/sqrt 2$ in mine,
            – Robert Lewis
            18 hours ago













          up vote
          5
          down vote










          up vote
          5
          down vote









          It appears that this equation can be well-addressed via a transformation to polar coordinates; in polars, we write



          $gamma(t) = r(t)e^{itheta(t)}; tag 1$



          then



          $dot gamma = dot r e^{itheta} + r i dot theta e^{itheta}; tag 2$



          also,



          $vert gamma vert = r, tag 3$



          whence



          $dfrac{gamma}{vert gamma vert} = e^{itheta}; tag 4$



          assembling all this into the given equation



          $dot gamma = s(i - 1) dfrac{gamma}{vert gamma vert} tag 5$



          yields



          $dot r e^{itheta} + r i dot theta e^{itheta} = s(i - 1) e^{itheta}; tag 6$



          we divide out $e^{itheta}$:



          $dot r + ridot theta = s(i - 1) = -s + is; tag 7$



          equating real and imaginary parts,



          $dot r = -s, tag 8$



          $ridot theta = is; tag 9$



          $rdot theta = s; tag{10}$



          we may easily integrate (8) 'twixt $t_0$ and $t$, assuming $r(t_0) = r_0$:



          $r - r_0 = -s(t - t_0), tag{11}$



          $r = r_0 - s(t - t_0); tag{12}$



          we observe that the coordinate constraint $r > 0$, along with the condition $s > 0$, implies that $t$ must remain less than $r_0/s + t_0$; we shall soon find that the polar solution circumvents this limit on $t$; inserting (12) into (10):



          $(r_0 - s(t - t_0))dot theta = s; tag{13}$



          $dot theta = dfrac{s}{r_0 - s(t - t_0)}, tag{14}$



          which is also easily integrated 'twixt $t_0$ and $t$:



          $theta - theta_0 = -ln(r_0 - s(t - t_0)) + ln r_0; tag{15}$



          $theta = theta_0 - ln(r_0 - s(t - t_0)) + ln r_0; tag{16}$



          using (12), we may express $r$ in term of $theta$:



          $theta = theta_0 - ln r + ln r_0; tag{17}$



          $e^theta = e^{theta_0} dfrac{r_0}{r}; tag{18}$



          $r = r_0 e^{theta_0 - theta}; tag{19}$



          the above presents the general solution for $t = t_0$, $r(t_0) = r_0$, $theta(t_0) = theta_0$; we specialize to the case at hand:



          $t_0 = 0, ; gamma(0) = 1 + i; tag{20}$



          $r_0 = vert gamma(0) vert = sqrt 2; tag{21}$



          $theta_0 = dfrac{pi}{4}; tag{22}$



          from (19):



          $r = sqrt 2 e^{pi/4 - theta}; tag{23}$



          from (12) and (16):



          $r(t) = sqrt 2 - st; tag{24}$



          $theta(t) = dfrac{pi}{4} - ln(sqrt 2 - s(t - t_0)) + ln sqrt 2. tag{25}$



          The path length is perhaps easiest found by returning to the expressions for $r(t)$ and $theta(t)$, in terms of which



          $vert dot gamma vert = sqrt{ (dot r)^2 + r^2 (dot theta)^2} = sqrt{s^2 + s^2} = sqrt 2 s; tag{26}$



          since $t$ is restricted to $[0, r_0/s]$, the length of the curve is



          $displaystyle int_0^{r_0/s} vert dot gamma vert ; dt = displaystyle int_0^{r_0/s} sqrt 2 s ; dt = sqrt 2 r_0. tag{27}$






          share|cite|improve this answer














          It appears that this equation can be well-addressed via a transformation to polar coordinates; in polars, we write



          $gamma(t) = r(t)e^{itheta(t)}; tag 1$



          then



          $dot gamma = dot r e^{itheta} + r i dot theta e^{itheta}; tag 2$



          also,



          $vert gamma vert = r, tag 3$



          whence



          $dfrac{gamma}{vert gamma vert} = e^{itheta}; tag 4$



          assembling all this into the given equation



          $dot gamma = s(i - 1) dfrac{gamma}{vert gamma vert} tag 5$



          yields



          $dot r e^{itheta} + r i dot theta e^{itheta} = s(i - 1) e^{itheta}; tag 6$



          we divide out $e^{itheta}$:



          $dot r + ridot theta = s(i - 1) = -s + is; tag 7$



          equating real and imaginary parts,



          $dot r = -s, tag 8$



          $ridot theta = is; tag 9$



          $rdot theta = s; tag{10}$



          we may easily integrate (8) 'twixt $t_0$ and $t$, assuming $r(t_0) = r_0$:



          $r - r_0 = -s(t - t_0), tag{11}$



          $r = r_0 - s(t - t_0); tag{12}$



          we observe that the coordinate constraint $r > 0$, along with the condition $s > 0$, implies that $t$ must remain less than $r_0/s + t_0$; we shall soon find that the polar solution circumvents this limit on $t$; inserting (12) into (10):



          $(r_0 - s(t - t_0))dot theta = s; tag{13}$



          $dot theta = dfrac{s}{r_0 - s(t - t_0)}, tag{14}$



          which is also easily integrated 'twixt $t_0$ and $t$:



          $theta - theta_0 = -ln(r_0 - s(t - t_0)) + ln r_0; tag{15}$



          $theta = theta_0 - ln(r_0 - s(t - t_0)) + ln r_0; tag{16}$



          using (12), we may express $r$ in term of $theta$:



          $theta = theta_0 - ln r + ln r_0; tag{17}$



          $e^theta = e^{theta_0} dfrac{r_0}{r}; tag{18}$



          $r = r_0 e^{theta_0 - theta}; tag{19}$



          the above presents the general solution for $t = t_0$, $r(t_0) = r_0$, $theta(t_0) = theta_0$; we specialize to the case at hand:



          $t_0 = 0, ; gamma(0) = 1 + i; tag{20}$



          $r_0 = vert gamma(0) vert = sqrt 2; tag{21}$



          $theta_0 = dfrac{pi}{4}; tag{22}$



          from (19):



          $r = sqrt 2 e^{pi/4 - theta}; tag{23}$



          from (12) and (16):



          $r(t) = sqrt 2 - st; tag{24}$



          $theta(t) = dfrac{pi}{4} - ln(sqrt 2 - s(t - t_0)) + ln sqrt 2. tag{25}$



          The path length is perhaps easiest found by returning to the expressions for $r(t)$ and $theta(t)$, in terms of which



          $vert dot gamma vert = sqrt{ (dot r)^2 + r^2 (dot theta)^2} = sqrt{s^2 + s^2} = sqrt 2 s; tag{26}$



          since $t$ is restricted to $[0, r_0/s]$, the length of the curve is



          $displaystyle int_0^{r_0/s} vert dot gamma vert ; dt = displaystyle int_0^{r_0/s} sqrt 2 s ; dt = sqrt 2 r_0. tag{27}$







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited 5 hours ago

























          answered 19 hours ago









          Robert Lewis

          42.4k22861




          42.4k22861








          • 1




            Thanks! I see that $r=sqrt{2}exp(pi/4-theta)$ for $thetageqpi/4$ is a good polar expression for this curve. However this curve never reaches the origin, but $r(t)=sqrt{2}-st$ on line 24 seems to imply $r=0$ for $t=sqrt{2}/s$. Does the image of $tin[0,sqrt{2}/s)$ under $gamma$ contain the entire curve?
            – M. Nestor
            18 hours ago












          • @M.Nestor: well, a quick answer which I think adequate is that the polar coordinate system isn't really defined at $r = 0$, so we should really say $t < sqrt 2 / s$. I should probably edit that part of my answer.
            – Robert Lewis
            18 hours ago








          • 1




            @M.Nestor: you should be able to get answers to your edited question by taking $s = 1/sqrt 2$ in mine,
            – Robert Lewis
            18 hours ago














          • 1




            Thanks! I see that $r=sqrt{2}exp(pi/4-theta)$ for $thetageqpi/4$ is a good polar expression for this curve. However this curve never reaches the origin, but $r(t)=sqrt{2}-st$ on line 24 seems to imply $r=0$ for $t=sqrt{2}/s$. Does the image of $tin[0,sqrt{2}/s)$ under $gamma$ contain the entire curve?
            – M. Nestor
            18 hours ago












          • @M.Nestor: well, a quick answer which I think adequate is that the polar coordinate system isn't really defined at $r = 0$, so we should really say $t < sqrt 2 / s$. I should probably edit that part of my answer.
            – Robert Lewis
            18 hours ago








          • 1




            @M.Nestor: you should be able to get answers to your edited question by taking $s = 1/sqrt 2$ in mine,
            – Robert Lewis
            18 hours ago








          1




          1




          Thanks! I see that $r=sqrt{2}exp(pi/4-theta)$ for $thetageqpi/4$ is a good polar expression for this curve. However this curve never reaches the origin, but $r(t)=sqrt{2}-st$ on line 24 seems to imply $r=0$ for $t=sqrt{2}/s$. Does the image of $tin[0,sqrt{2}/s)$ under $gamma$ contain the entire curve?
          – M. Nestor
          18 hours ago






          Thanks! I see that $r=sqrt{2}exp(pi/4-theta)$ for $thetageqpi/4$ is a good polar expression for this curve. However this curve never reaches the origin, but $r(t)=sqrt{2}-st$ on line 24 seems to imply $r=0$ for $t=sqrt{2}/s$. Does the image of $tin[0,sqrt{2}/s)$ under $gamma$ contain the entire curve?
          – M. Nestor
          18 hours ago














          @M.Nestor: well, a quick answer which I think adequate is that the polar coordinate system isn't really defined at $r = 0$, so we should really say $t < sqrt 2 / s$. I should probably edit that part of my answer.
          – Robert Lewis
          18 hours ago






          @M.Nestor: well, a quick answer which I think adequate is that the polar coordinate system isn't really defined at $r = 0$, so we should really say $t < sqrt 2 / s$. I should probably edit that part of my answer.
          – Robert Lewis
          18 hours ago






          1




          1




          @M.Nestor: you should be able to get answers to your edited question by taking $s = 1/sqrt 2$ in mine,
          – Robert Lewis
          18 hours ago




          @M.Nestor: you should be able to get answers to your edited question by taking $s = 1/sqrt 2$ in mine,
          – Robert Lewis
          18 hours ago


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3031948%2fcalculate-path-length-of-solution-to-differential-equation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Mont Emei

          Province de Neuquén

          Journaliste