“here and there was a tent” VS “here and there were tents”











up vote
6
down vote

favorite
1













They trudged up the misty field between long rows of tents. Most looked almost ordinary; their owners had clearly tried to make them as Muggle-like as possible, but had slipped up by adding chimneys, or bellpulls, or weather vanes. However, here and there was a tent so obviously magical that Harry could hardly be surprised that Mr. Roberts was getting suspicious. ...




I found "here and there was a tent..." interesting. Apparently, there were many tents mentioned in this context, so I'm wondering why it didn't put "here and there were tents..." instead?










share|improve this question


















  • 2




    Either would work really - "here and there were tents so obviously magical..." vs "here and there was a tent so obviously magical...". There's only a subtle difference (as others have stated) in the plurality - though really it's just nitpicking since you could interpret in various ways.
    – Charleh
    yesterday

















up vote
6
down vote

favorite
1













They trudged up the misty field between long rows of tents. Most looked almost ordinary; their owners had clearly tried to make them as Muggle-like as possible, but had slipped up by adding chimneys, or bellpulls, or weather vanes. However, here and there was a tent so obviously magical that Harry could hardly be surprised that Mr. Roberts was getting suspicious. ...




I found "here and there was a tent..." interesting. Apparently, there were many tents mentioned in this context, so I'm wondering why it didn't put "here and there were tents..." instead?










share|improve this question


















  • 2




    Either would work really - "here and there were tents so obviously magical..." vs "here and there was a tent so obviously magical...". There's only a subtle difference (as others have stated) in the plurality - though really it's just nitpicking since you could interpret in various ways.
    – Charleh
    yesterday















up vote
6
down vote

favorite
1









up vote
6
down vote

favorite
1






1






They trudged up the misty field between long rows of tents. Most looked almost ordinary; their owners had clearly tried to make them as Muggle-like as possible, but had slipped up by adding chimneys, or bellpulls, or weather vanes. However, here and there was a tent so obviously magical that Harry could hardly be surprised that Mr. Roberts was getting suspicious. ...




I found "here and there was a tent..." interesting. Apparently, there were many tents mentioned in this context, so I'm wondering why it didn't put "here and there were tents..." instead?










share|improve this question














They trudged up the misty field between long rows of tents. Most looked almost ordinary; their owners had clearly tried to make them as Muggle-like as possible, but had slipped up by adding chimneys, or bellpulls, or weather vanes. However, here and there was a tent so obviously magical that Harry could hardly be surprised that Mr. Roberts was getting suspicious. ...




I found "here and there was a tent..." interesting. Apparently, there were many tents mentioned in this context, so I'm wondering why it didn't put "here and there were tents..." instead?







singular-vs-plural






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked yesterday









dan

3,95722462




3,95722462








  • 2




    Either would work really - "here and there were tents so obviously magical..." vs "here and there was a tent so obviously magical...". There's only a subtle difference (as others have stated) in the plurality - though really it's just nitpicking since you could interpret in various ways.
    – Charleh
    yesterday
















  • 2




    Either would work really - "here and there were tents so obviously magical..." vs "here and there was a tent so obviously magical...". There's only a subtle difference (as others have stated) in the plurality - though really it's just nitpicking since you could interpret in various ways.
    – Charleh
    yesterday










2




2




Either would work really - "here and there were tents so obviously magical..." vs "here and there was a tent so obviously magical...". There's only a subtle difference (as others have stated) in the plurality - though really it's just nitpicking since you could interpret in various ways.
– Charleh
yesterday






Either would work really - "here and there were tents so obviously magical..." vs "here and there was a tent so obviously magical...". There's only a subtle difference (as others have stated) in the plurality - though really it's just nitpicking since you could interpret in various ways.
– Charleh
yesterday












3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
11
down vote



accepted











here and there was a tent




vs




here and there were tents




The difference is in plurality, the first one says that there were single tents dotted about, but your sentence is not that precise. In your wording, there could be any number of tents in a patch – it could be one or it could be five.






share|improve this answer



















  • 1




    The first one says there were parts of a single tent here and over there. And IMO (low scoring nGram) there should be a second there after "there". Or before: There were tents here and there.
    – Mazura
    yesterday


















up vote
3
down vote













"Here and there were tents" would be the typical phrasing. That is a phrase which indicates that there are many tents, though there is typically no visible structure to them. That can be contrasted with "a long row of tents" which has a very clear row-like structure. Those phrases together would show a well ordered group of tends (in a row), of which some portion are "obviously magical," but there's no particular rhyme or reason to it.



Rowling's choice of "Here and there was a tent" is a more atypical phrasing. She is using an unusual construction which gives more of an impression of isolation. The magical tents are kind of independent, each one standing on its own.



I would read into her words as an explanation for why Mr. Roberts is merely suspicious. In his mind, each of these "obviously magical" tents is an isolated thing, and he hasn't yet connected the dots. He hasn't linked together all the information he's observing about each tent to come to a conclusion that the tents, as a whole, were magical. If she had used the more typical phrase, "Here and there were tents..." that would give more of the impression that the dots are indeed being connected.



Personally, I would almost always use the more typical plural sentence. However, a writer often understands the subtle effects word choice has. In this case, Rowling chose the singular.






share|improve this answer





















  • Your 2nd paragraph is spot on, I was going to give my own answer, but I think yours is good, as it really points out what Rowling was trying to convey.
    – Glen Yates
    yesterday


















up vote
1
down vote













@WendyG is correct; however, to me, it's a bit more clear if you reorder the sentence a bit:




There were tents here and there




In this case, there are patches of magical tents scattered around the campgrounds (i.e. multiple cases of multiple magical tents grouped together).



v.s.




There was a tent here and there




In this case, there are single magical tents scattered around the campgrounds (i.e. multiple cases of a single magical tent).






share|improve this answer








New contributor




John T is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.














  • 1




    I disagree that "there were tents here and there" suggests that the tents are necessarily in groups. It allows the possibility of them being in groups but, to me, it would be entirely legitimate to say "there were tents here and there" to describe scattered single tents, too.
    – David Richerby
    yesterday











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "481"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f187664%2fhere-and-there-was-a-tent-vs-here-and-there-were-tents%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes








3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
11
down vote



accepted











here and there was a tent




vs




here and there were tents




The difference is in plurality, the first one says that there were single tents dotted about, but your sentence is not that precise. In your wording, there could be any number of tents in a patch – it could be one or it could be five.






share|improve this answer



















  • 1




    The first one says there were parts of a single tent here and over there. And IMO (low scoring nGram) there should be a second there after "there". Or before: There were tents here and there.
    – Mazura
    yesterday















up vote
11
down vote



accepted











here and there was a tent




vs




here and there were tents




The difference is in plurality, the first one says that there were single tents dotted about, but your sentence is not that precise. In your wording, there could be any number of tents in a patch – it could be one or it could be five.






share|improve this answer



















  • 1




    The first one says there were parts of a single tent here and over there. And IMO (low scoring nGram) there should be a second there after "there". Or before: There were tents here and there.
    – Mazura
    yesterday













up vote
11
down vote



accepted







up vote
11
down vote



accepted







here and there was a tent




vs




here and there were tents




The difference is in plurality, the first one says that there were single tents dotted about, but your sentence is not that precise. In your wording, there could be any number of tents in a patch – it could be one or it could be five.






share|improve this answer















here and there was a tent




vs




here and there were tents




The difference is in plurality, the first one says that there were single tents dotted about, but your sentence is not that precise. In your wording, there could be any number of tents in a patch – it could be one or it could be five.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited yesterday









J.R.

97.1k8126242




97.1k8126242










answered yesterday









WendyG

855310




855310








  • 1




    The first one says there were parts of a single tent here and over there. And IMO (low scoring nGram) there should be a second there after "there". Or before: There were tents here and there.
    – Mazura
    yesterday














  • 1




    The first one says there were parts of a single tent here and over there. And IMO (low scoring nGram) there should be a second there after "there". Or before: There were tents here and there.
    – Mazura
    yesterday








1




1




The first one says there were parts of a single tent here and over there. And IMO (low scoring nGram) there should be a second there after "there". Or before: There were tents here and there.
– Mazura
yesterday




The first one says there were parts of a single tent here and over there. And IMO (low scoring nGram) there should be a second there after "there". Or before: There were tents here and there.
– Mazura
yesterday












up vote
3
down vote













"Here and there were tents" would be the typical phrasing. That is a phrase which indicates that there are many tents, though there is typically no visible structure to them. That can be contrasted with "a long row of tents" which has a very clear row-like structure. Those phrases together would show a well ordered group of tends (in a row), of which some portion are "obviously magical," but there's no particular rhyme or reason to it.



Rowling's choice of "Here and there was a tent" is a more atypical phrasing. She is using an unusual construction which gives more of an impression of isolation. The magical tents are kind of independent, each one standing on its own.



I would read into her words as an explanation for why Mr. Roberts is merely suspicious. In his mind, each of these "obviously magical" tents is an isolated thing, and he hasn't yet connected the dots. He hasn't linked together all the information he's observing about each tent to come to a conclusion that the tents, as a whole, were magical. If she had used the more typical phrase, "Here and there were tents..." that would give more of the impression that the dots are indeed being connected.



Personally, I would almost always use the more typical plural sentence. However, a writer often understands the subtle effects word choice has. In this case, Rowling chose the singular.






share|improve this answer





















  • Your 2nd paragraph is spot on, I was going to give my own answer, but I think yours is good, as it really points out what Rowling was trying to convey.
    – Glen Yates
    yesterday















up vote
3
down vote













"Here and there were tents" would be the typical phrasing. That is a phrase which indicates that there are many tents, though there is typically no visible structure to them. That can be contrasted with "a long row of tents" which has a very clear row-like structure. Those phrases together would show a well ordered group of tends (in a row), of which some portion are "obviously magical," but there's no particular rhyme or reason to it.



Rowling's choice of "Here and there was a tent" is a more atypical phrasing. She is using an unusual construction which gives more of an impression of isolation. The magical tents are kind of independent, each one standing on its own.



I would read into her words as an explanation for why Mr. Roberts is merely suspicious. In his mind, each of these "obviously magical" tents is an isolated thing, and he hasn't yet connected the dots. He hasn't linked together all the information he's observing about each tent to come to a conclusion that the tents, as a whole, were magical. If she had used the more typical phrase, "Here and there were tents..." that would give more of the impression that the dots are indeed being connected.



Personally, I would almost always use the more typical plural sentence. However, a writer often understands the subtle effects word choice has. In this case, Rowling chose the singular.






share|improve this answer





















  • Your 2nd paragraph is spot on, I was going to give my own answer, but I think yours is good, as it really points out what Rowling was trying to convey.
    – Glen Yates
    yesterday













up vote
3
down vote










up vote
3
down vote









"Here and there were tents" would be the typical phrasing. That is a phrase which indicates that there are many tents, though there is typically no visible structure to them. That can be contrasted with "a long row of tents" which has a very clear row-like structure. Those phrases together would show a well ordered group of tends (in a row), of which some portion are "obviously magical," but there's no particular rhyme or reason to it.



Rowling's choice of "Here and there was a tent" is a more atypical phrasing. She is using an unusual construction which gives more of an impression of isolation. The magical tents are kind of independent, each one standing on its own.



I would read into her words as an explanation for why Mr. Roberts is merely suspicious. In his mind, each of these "obviously magical" tents is an isolated thing, and he hasn't yet connected the dots. He hasn't linked together all the information he's observing about each tent to come to a conclusion that the tents, as a whole, were magical. If she had used the more typical phrase, "Here and there were tents..." that would give more of the impression that the dots are indeed being connected.



Personally, I would almost always use the more typical plural sentence. However, a writer often understands the subtle effects word choice has. In this case, Rowling chose the singular.






share|improve this answer












"Here and there were tents" would be the typical phrasing. That is a phrase which indicates that there are many tents, though there is typically no visible structure to them. That can be contrasted with "a long row of tents" which has a very clear row-like structure. Those phrases together would show a well ordered group of tends (in a row), of which some portion are "obviously magical," but there's no particular rhyme or reason to it.



Rowling's choice of "Here and there was a tent" is a more atypical phrasing. She is using an unusual construction which gives more of an impression of isolation. The magical tents are kind of independent, each one standing on its own.



I would read into her words as an explanation for why Mr. Roberts is merely suspicious. In his mind, each of these "obviously magical" tents is an isolated thing, and he hasn't yet connected the dots. He hasn't linked together all the information he's observing about each tent to come to a conclusion that the tents, as a whole, were magical. If she had used the more typical phrase, "Here and there were tents..." that would give more of the impression that the dots are indeed being connected.



Personally, I would almost always use the more typical plural sentence. However, a writer often understands the subtle effects word choice has. In this case, Rowling chose the singular.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered yesterday









Cort Ammon

2,015510




2,015510












  • Your 2nd paragraph is spot on, I was going to give my own answer, but I think yours is good, as it really points out what Rowling was trying to convey.
    – Glen Yates
    yesterday


















  • Your 2nd paragraph is spot on, I was going to give my own answer, but I think yours is good, as it really points out what Rowling was trying to convey.
    – Glen Yates
    yesterday
















Your 2nd paragraph is spot on, I was going to give my own answer, but I think yours is good, as it really points out what Rowling was trying to convey.
– Glen Yates
yesterday




Your 2nd paragraph is spot on, I was going to give my own answer, but I think yours is good, as it really points out what Rowling was trying to convey.
– Glen Yates
yesterday










up vote
1
down vote













@WendyG is correct; however, to me, it's a bit more clear if you reorder the sentence a bit:




There were tents here and there




In this case, there are patches of magical tents scattered around the campgrounds (i.e. multiple cases of multiple magical tents grouped together).



v.s.




There was a tent here and there




In this case, there are single magical tents scattered around the campgrounds (i.e. multiple cases of a single magical tent).






share|improve this answer








New contributor




John T is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.














  • 1




    I disagree that "there were tents here and there" suggests that the tents are necessarily in groups. It allows the possibility of them being in groups but, to me, it would be entirely legitimate to say "there were tents here and there" to describe scattered single tents, too.
    – David Richerby
    yesterday















up vote
1
down vote













@WendyG is correct; however, to me, it's a bit more clear if you reorder the sentence a bit:




There were tents here and there




In this case, there are patches of magical tents scattered around the campgrounds (i.e. multiple cases of multiple magical tents grouped together).



v.s.




There was a tent here and there




In this case, there are single magical tents scattered around the campgrounds (i.e. multiple cases of a single magical tent).






share|improve this answer








New contributor




John T is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.














  • 1




    I disagree that "there were tents here and there" suggests that the tents are necessarily in groups. It allows the possibility of them being in groups but, to me, it would be entirely legitimate to say "there were tents here and there" to describe scattered single tents, too.
    – David Richerby
    yesterday













up vote
1
down vote










up vote
1
down vote









@WendyG is correct; however, to me, it's a bit more clear if you reorder the sentence a bit:




There were tents here and there




In this case, there are patches of magical tents scattered around the campgrounds (i.e. multiple cases of multiple magical tents grouped together).



v.s.




There was a tent here and there




In this case, there are single magical tents scattered around the campgrounds (i.e. multiple cases of a single magical tent).






share|improve this answer








New contributor




John T is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









@WendyG is correct; however, to me, it's a bit more clear if you reorder the sentence a bit:




There were tents here and there




In this case, there are patches of magical tents scattered around the campgrounds (i.e. multiple cases of multiple magical tents grouped together).



v.s.




There was a tent here and there




In this case, there are single magical tents scattered around the campgrounds (i.e. multiple cases of a single magical tent).







share|improve this answer








New contributor




John T is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer






New contributor




John T is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









answered yesterday









John T

1113




1113




New contributor




John T is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





John T is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






John T is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








  • 1




    I disagree that "there were tents here and there" suggests that the tents are necessarily in groups. It allows the possibility of them being in groups but, to me, it would be entirely legitimate to say "there were tents here and there" to describe scattered single tents, too.
    – David Richerby
    yesterday














  • 1




    I disagree that "there were tents here and there" suggests that the tents are necessarily in groups. It allows the possibility of them being in groups but, to me, it would be entirely legitimate to say "there were tents here and there" to describe scattered single tents, too.
    – David Richerby
    yesterday








1




1




I disagree that "there were tents here and there" suggests that the tents are necessarily in groups. It allows the possibility of them being in groups but, to me, it would be entirely legitimate to say "there were tents here and there" to describe scattered single tents, too.
– David Richerby
yesterday




I disagree that "there were tents here and there" suggests that the tents are necessarily in groups. It allows the possibility of them being in groups but, to me, it would be entirely legitimate to say "there were tents here and there" to describe scattered single tents, too.
– David Richerby
yesterday


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language Learners Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f187664%2fhere-and-there-was-a-tent-vs-here-and-there-were-tents%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Quarter-circle Tiles

build a pushdown automaton that recognizes the reverse language of a given pushdown automaton?

Mont Emei