How do you tell apt to use files in /etc/apt/sources.list.d

Multi tool use
up vote
16
down vote
favorite
I added a repo by putting a file in
/etc/apt/sources.list.d
and then i did an
apt-get update.
However it didn't do anything with that repo. I then noticed that it didn't appear to be including any of the repos in that directory. Only stuff in /etc/apt/sources.list seem to be noticed by apt-get. All the files in the directory end in .list and contain something like:
virtualbox.list
deb http://download.virtualbox.org/virtualbox/debian oneiric contrib
pj-assis-ppa-oneiric.list
deb http://ppa.launchpad.net/pj-assis/ppa/ubuntu oneiric main
deb-src http://ppa.launchpad.net/pj-assis/ppa/ubuntu oneiric main
Do I need to put some sort of include statement in /etc/apt/sources.list?
I'm using kubuntu 11.10.
apt repository
add a comment |
up vote
16
down vote
favorite
I added a repo by putting a file in
/etc/apt/sources.list.d
and then i did an
apt-get update.
However it didn't do anything with that repo. I then noticed that it didn't appear to be including any of the repos in that directory. Only stuff in /etc/apt/sources.list seem to be noticed by apt-get. All the files in the directory end in .list and contain something like:
virtualbox.list
deb http://download.virtualbox.org/virtualbox/debian oneiric contrib
pj-assis-ppa-oneiric.list
deb http://ppa.launchpad.net/pj-assis/ppa/ubuntu oneiric main
deb-src http://ppa.launchpad.net/pj-assis/ppa/ubuntu oneiric main
Do I need to put some sort of include statement in /etc/apt/sources.list?
I'm using kubuntu 11.10.
apt repository
1
You can dump the current apt configuration by usingapt-config dump
. There should be a line that saysDir::Etc::sourceparts "sources.list.d";
. Maybe this helps for further investigation.
– phoibos
Sep 18 '12 at 12:30
You didapt-get update
orsudo apt-get update
? How did you notice or confirm that, that repository is not enabled?
– Anwar
Sep 18 '12 at 12:51
just copy the lines in/etc/apt/sources.list
.
– green
Sep 18 '12 at 14:03
So the problem seemed to be that I had a package installed from one of the normal apt repos and I wanted it to update with a version from one of the new repos. Apparently this is not possible. I had to uninstall the packages in question and then install with all of the normal repos commented out. I'm still not sure why when you do an apt-get update, that none of these new repos have their urls displayed.
– Jistanidiot
Sep 25 '12 at 15:10
add a comment |
up vote
16
down vote
favorite
up vote
16
down vote
favorite
I added a repo by putting a file in
/etc/apt/sources.list.d
and then i did an
apt-get update.
However it didn't do anything with that repo. I then noticed that it didn't appear to be including any of the repos in that directory. Only stuff in /etc/apt/sources.list seem to be noticed by apt-get. All the files in the directory end in .list and contain something like:
virtualbox.list
deb http://download.virtualbox.org/virtualbox/debian oneiric contrib
pj-assis-ppa-oneiric.list
deb http://ppa.launchpad.net/pj-assis/ppa/ubuntu oneiric main
deb-src http://ppa.launchpad.net/pj-assis/ppa/ubuntu oneiric main
Do I need to put some sort of include statement in /etc/apt/sources.list?
I'm using kubuntu 11.10.
apt repository
I added a repo by putting a file in
/etc/apt/sources.list.d
and then i did an
apt-get update.
However it didn't do anything with that repo. I then noticed that it didn't appear to be including any of the repos in that directory. Only stuff in /etc/apt/sources.list seem to be noticed by apt-get. All the files in the directory end in .list and contain something like:
virtualbox.list
deb http://download.virtualbox.org/virtualbox/debian oneiric contrib
pj-assis-ppa-oneiric.list
deb http://ppa.launchpad.net/pj-assis/ppa/ubuntu oneiric main
deb-src http://ppa.launchpad.net/pj-assis/ppa/ubuntu oneiric main
Do I need to put some sort of include statement in /etc/apt/sources.list?
I'm using kubuntu 11.10.
apt repository
apt repository
edited Sep 18 '12 at 13:12
Jorge Castro
35.6k105422617
35.6k105422617
asked Sep 18 '12 at 11:36
Jistanidiot
2661212
2661212
1
You can dump the current apt configuration by usingapt-config dump
. There should be a line that saysDir::Etc::sourceparts "sources.list.d";
. Maybe this helps for further investigation.
– phoibos
Sep 18 '12 at 12:30
You didapt-get update
orsudo apt-get update
? How did you notice or confirm that, that repository is not enabled?
– Anwar
Sep 18 '12 at 12:51
just copy the lines in/etc/apt/sources.list
.
– green
Sep 18 '12 at 14:03
So the problem seemed to be that I had a package installed from one of the normal apt repos and I wanted it to update with a version from one of the new repos. Apparently this is not possible. I had to uninstall the packages in question and then install with all of the normal repos commented out. I'm still not sure why when you do an apt-get update, that none of these new repos have their urls displayed.
– Jistanidiot
Sep 25 '12 at 15:10
add a comment |
1
You can dump the current apt configuration by usingapt-config dump
. There should be a line that saysDir::Etc::sourceparts "sources.list.d";
. Maybe this helps for further investigation.
– phoibos
Sep 18 '12 at 12:30
You didapt-get update
orsudo apt-get update
? How did you notice or confirm that, that repository is not enabled?
– Anwar
Sep 18 '12 at 12:51
just copy the lines in/etc/apt/sources.list
.
– green
Sep 18 '12 at 14:03
So the problem seemed to be that I had a package installed from one of the normal apt repos and I wanted it to update with a version from one of the new repos. Apparently this is not possible. I had to uninstall the packages in question and then install with all of the normal repos commented out. I'm still not sure why when you do an apt-get update, that none of these new repos have their urls displayed.
– Jistanidiot
Sep 25 '12 at 15:10
1
1
You can dump the current apt configuration by using
apt-config dump
. There should be a line that says Dir::Etc::sourceparts "sources.list.d";
. Maybe this helps for further investigation.– phoibos
Sep 18 '12 at 12:30
You can dump the current apt configuration by using
apt-config dump
. There should be a line that says Dir::Etc::sourceparts "sources.list.d";
. Maybe this helps for further investigation.– phoibos
Sep 18 '12 at 12:30
You did
apt-get update
or sudo apt-get update
? How did you notice or confirm that, that repository is not enabled?– Anwar
Sep 18 '12 at 12:51
You did
apt-get update
or sudo apt-get update
? How did you notice or confirm that, that repository is not enabled?– Anwar
Sep 18 '12 at 12:51
just copy the lines in
/etc/apt/sources.list
.– green
Sep 18 '12 at 14:03
just copy the lines in
/etc/apt/sources.list
.– green
Sep 18 '12 at 14:03
So the problem seemed to be that I had a package installed from one of the normal apt repos and I wanted it to update with a version from one of the new repos. Apparently this is not possible. I had to uninstall the packages in question and then install with all of the normal repos commented out. I'm still not sure why when you do an apt-get update, that none of these new repos have their urls displayed.
– Jistanidiot
Sep 25 '12 at 15:10
So the problem seemed to be that I had a package installed from one of the normal apt repos and I wanted it to update with a version from one of the new repos. Apparently this is not possible. I had to uninstall the packages in question and then install with all of the normal repos commented out. I'm still not sure why when you do an apt-get update, that none of these new repos have their urls displayed.
– Jistanidiot
Sep 25 '12 at 15:10
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
11
down vote
The names of files in /etc/sources.list.d
must end in .list
, if they are to be included as software sources.
As the man page of sources.list says:
DESCRIPTION
The package resource list is used to locate archives of the package
distribution system in use on the system. At this time, this manual
page documents only the packaging system used by the Debian GNU/Linux
system. This control file is /etc/apt/sources.list.
The source list is designed to support any number of active sources and
a variety of source media. The file lists one source per line, with the
most preferred source listed first. The format of each line is: type
uri args The first item, type determines the format for args. uri is a
Universal Resource Identifier (URI), which is a superset of the more
specific and well-known Universal Resource Locator, or URL. The rest of
the line can be marked as a comment by using a #.
SOURCES.LIST.D
The /etc/apt/sources.list.d directory provides a way to add
sources.list entries in separate files. The format is the same as for
the regular sources.list file. File names need to end with .list and
may only contain letters (a-z and A-Z), digits (0-9), underscore (_),
hyphen (-) and period (.) characters. Otherwise APT will print a notice
that it has ignored a file if the file doesn't match a pattern in the
Dir::Ignore-Files-Silently configuration list - in this case it will be
silently ignored.
Taking an example from this page, suppose you wanted to install chef (from opscode), what you'd do is:
- Create and open a file named
opscode.list
:
sudo vim /etc/apt/sources.list.d/opscode.list
- Add the required line and save the file:
deb http://apt.opscode.com/ oneiric main
The above steps can be combined to make a single command:
sudo /bin/sh -c 'echo "deb http://apt.opscode.com/ onereic main" > /etc/apt/sources.list.d/opscode.list'
Note: The command contains onereic
because the codename of the Ubuntu you're using is Onereic. Had you been using Precise (12.04), you'd have writter precise
.
5
Have you read the OP? He does all these steps.
– January
Sep 18 '12 at 11:55
He did not specify, what file he added.
– green
Sep 18 '12 at 13:10
1
He did give two names (virtualbox.list and another one)
– January
Sep 18 '12 at 13:14
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
So the problem seemed to be that I had a package installed from one of the normal apt repos and I wanted it to update with a version from one of the new repos. Apparently this is not possible. I had to uninstall the packages in question and then install with all of the normal repos commented out. I'm still not sure why when you do an apt-get update, that none of these new repos have their urls displayed.
1
You do not answer your own question. What you did here is not very clear, doesn't relate to your question and probably it should have been done by apt pinning.
– Johannes
Aug 29 '13 at 9:38
3
I only can tell you that this fixed the problem I was having when I asked the question. The other "answer" clearly didn't read my question and was totally useless. This is what worked for me. I don't know if it will work for anyone else. I assume it was some bug in ubuntu 11 that caused it not to use updated packages from additional repos. It seems to not be an issue in ubuntu 12 or 13.
– Jistanidiot
Aug 30 '13 at 11:11
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
11
down vote
The names of files in /etc/sources.list.d
must end in .list
, if they are to be included as software sources.
As the man page of sources.list says:
DESCRIPTION
The package resource list is used to locate archives of the package
distribution system in use on the system. At this time, this manual
page documents only the packaging system used by the Debian GNU/Linux
system. This control file is /etc/apt/sources.list.
The source list is designed to support any number of active sources and
a variety of source media. The file lists one source per line, with the
most preferred source listed first. The format of each line is: type
uri args The first item, type determines the format for args. uri is a
Universal Resource Identifier (URI), which is a superset of the more
specific and well-known Universal Resource Locator, or URL. The rest of
the line can be marked as a comment by using a #.
SOURCES.LIST.D
The /etc/apt/sources.list.d directory provides a way to add
sources.list entries in separate files. The format is the same as for
the regular sources.list file. File names need to end with .list and
may only contain letters (a-z and A-Z), digits (0-9), underscore (_),
hyphen (-) and period (.) characters. Otherwise APT will print a notice
that it has ignored a file if the file doesn't match a pattern in the
Dir::Ignore-Files-Silently configuration list - in this case it will be
silently ignored.
Taking an example from this page, suppose you wanted to install chef (from opscode), what you'd do is:
- Create and open a file named
opscode.list
:
sudo vim /etc/apt/sources.list.d/opscode.list
- Add the required line and save the file:
deb http://apt.opscode.com/ oneiric main
The above steps can be combined to make a single command:
sudo /bin/sh -c 'echo "deb http://apt.opscode.com/ onereic main" > /etc/apt/sources.list.d/opscode.list'
Note: The command contains onereic
because the codename of the Ubuntu you're using is Onereic. Had you been using Precise (12.04), you'd have writter precise
.
5
Have you read the OP? He does all these steps.
– January
Sep 18 '12 at 11:55
He did not specify, what file he added.
– green
Sep 18 '12 at 13:10
1
He did give two names (virtualbox.list and another one)
– January
Sep 18 '12 at 13:14
add a comment |
up vote
11
down vote
The names of files in /etc/sources.list.d
must end in .list
, if they are to be included as software sources.
As the man page of sources.list says:
DESCRIPTION
The package resource list is used to locate archives of the package
distribution system in use on the system. At this time, this manual
page documents only the packaging system used by the Debian GNU/Linux
system. This control file is /etc/apt/sources.list.
The source list is designed to support any number of active sources and
a variety of source media. The file lists one source per line, with the
most preferred source listed first. The format of each line is: type
uri args The first item, type determines the format for args. uri is a
Universal Resource Identifier (URI), which is a superset of the more
specific and well-known Universal Resource Locator, or URL. The rest of
the line can be marked as a comment by using a #.
SOURCES.LIST.D
The /etc/apt/sources.list.d directory provides a way to add
sources.list entries in separate files. The format is the same as for
the regular sources.list file. File names need to end with .list and
may only contain letters (a-z and A-Z), digits (0-9), underscore (_),
hyphen (-) and period (.) characters. Otherwise APT will print a notice
that it has ignored a file if the file doesn't match a pattern in the
Dir::Ignore-Files-Silently configuration list - in this case it will be
silently ignored.
Taking an example from this page, suppose you wanted to install chef (from opscode), what you'd do is:
- Create and open a file named
opscode.list
:
sudo vim /etc/apt/sources.list.d/opscode.list
- Add the required line and save the file:
deb http://apt.opscode.com/ oneiric main
The above steps can be combined to make a single command:
sudo /bin/sh -c 'echo "deb http://apt.opscode.com/ onereic main" > /etc/apt/sources.list.d/opscode.list'
Note: The command contains onereic
because the codename of the Ubuntu you're using is Onereic. Had you been using Precise (12.04), you'd have writter precise
.
5
Have you read the OP? He does all these steps.
– January
Sep 18 '12 at 11:55
He did not specify, what file he added.
– green
Sep 18 '12 at 13:10
1
He did give two names (virtualbox.list and another one)
– January
Sep 18 '12 at 13:14
add a comment |
up vote
11
down vote
up vote
11
down vote
The names of files in /etc/sources.list.d
must end in .list
, if they are to be included as software sources.
As the man page of sources.list says:
DESCRIPTION
The package resource list is used to locate archives of the package
distribution system in use on the system. At this time, this manual
page documents only the packaging system used by the Debian GNU/Linux
system. This control file is /etc/apt/sources.list.
The source list is designed to support any number of active sources and
a variety of source media. The file lists one source per line, with the
most preferred source listed first. The format of each line is: type
uri args The first item, type determines the format for args. uri is a
Universal Resource Identifier (URI), which is a superset of the more
specific and well-known Universal Resource Locator, or URL. The rest of
the line can be marked as a comment by using a #.
SOURCES.LIST.D
The /etc/apt/sources.list.d directory provides a way to add
sources.list entries in separate files. The format is the same as for
the regular sources.list file. File names need to end with .list and
may only contain letters (a-z and A-Z), digits (0-9), underscore (_),
hyphen (-) and period (.) characters. Otherwise APT will print a notice
that it has ignored a file if the file doesn't match a pattern in the
Dir::Ignore-Files-Silently configuration list - in this case it will be
silently ignored.
Taking an example from this page, suppose you wanted to install chef (from opscode), what you'd do is:
- Create and open a file named
opscode.list
:
sudo vim /etc/apt/sources.list.d/opscode.list
- Add the required line and save the file:
deb http://apt.opscode.com/ oneiric main
The above steps can be combined to make a single command:
sudo /bin/sh -c 'echo "deb http://apt.opscode.com/ onereic main" > /etc/apt/sources.list.d/opscode.list'
Note: The command contains onereic
because the codename of the Ubuntu you're using is Onereic. Had you been using Precise (12.04), you'd have writter precise
.
The names of files in /etc/sources.list.d
must end in .list
, if they are to be included as software sources.
As the man page of sources.list says:
DESCRIPTION
The package resource list is used to locate archives of the package
distribution system in use on the system. At this time, this manual
page documents only the packaging system used by the Debian GNU/Linux
system. This control file is /etc/apt/sources.list.
The source list is designed to support any number of active sources and
a variety of source media. The file lists one source per line, with the
most preferred source listed first. The format of each line is: type
uri args The first item, type determines the format for args. uri is a
Universal Resource Identifier (URI), which is a superset of the more
specific and well-known Universal Resource Locator, or URL. The rest of
the line can be marked as a comment by using a #.
SOURCES.LIST.D
The /etc/apt/sources.list.d directory provides a way to add
sources.list entries in separate files. The format is the same as for
the regular sources.list file. File names need to end with .list and
may only contain letters (a-z and A-Z), digits (0-9), underscore (_),
hyphen (-) and period (.) characters. Otherwise APT will print a notice
that it has ignored a file if the file doesn't match a pattern in the
Dir::Ignore-Files-Silently configuration list - in this case it will be
silently ignored.
Taking an example from this page, suppose you wanted to install chef (from opscode), what you'd do is:
- Create and open a file named
opscode.list
:
sudo vim /etc/apt/sources.list.d/opscode.list
- Add the required line and save the file:
deb http://apt.opscode.com/ oneiric main
The above steps can be combined to make a single command:
sudo /bin/sh -c 'echo "deb http://apt.opscode.com/ onereic main" > /etc/apt/sources.list.d/opscode.list'
Note: The command contains onereic
because the codename of the Ubuntu you're using is Onereic. Had you been using Precise (12.04), you'd have writter precise
.
edited Nov 26 at 22:30


abu_bua
3,10081023
3,10081023
answered Sep 18 '12 at 11:41
green
11.7k43558
11.7k43558
5
Have you read the OP? He does all these steps.
– January
Sep 18 '12 at 11:55
He did not specify, what file he added.
– green
Sep 18 '12 at 13:10
1
He did give two names (virtualbox.list and another one)
– January
Sep 18 '12 at 13:14
add a comment |
5
Have you read the OP? He does all these steps.
– January
Sep 18 '12 at 11:55
He did not specify, what file he added.
– green
Sep 18 '12 at 13:10
1
He did give two names (virtualbox.list and another one)
– January
Sep 18 '12 at 13:14
5
5
Have you read the OP? He does all these steps.
– January
Sep 18 '12 at 11:55
Have you read the OP? He does all these steps.
– January
Sep 18 '12 at 11:55
He did not specify, what file he added.
– green
Sep 18 '12 at 13:10
He did not specify, what file he added.
– green
Sep 18 '12 at 13:10
1
1
He did give two names (virtualbox.list and another one)
– January
Sep 18 '12 at 13:14
He did give two names (virtualbox.list and another one)
– January
Sep 18 '12 at 13:14
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
So the problem seemed to be that I had a package installed from one of the normal apt repos and I wanted it to update with a version from one of the new repos. Apparently this is not possible. I had to uninstall the packages in question and then install with all of the normal repos commented out. I'm still not sure why when you do an apt-get update, that none of these new repos have their urls displayed.
1
You do not answer your own question. What you did here is not very clear, doesn't relate to your question and probably it should have been done by apt pinning.
– Johannes
Aug 29 '13 at 9:38
3
I only can tell you that this fixed the problem I was having when I asked the question. The other "answer" clearly didn't read my question and was totally useless. This is what worked for me. I don't know if it will work for anyone else. I assume it was some bug in ubuntu 11 that caused it not to use updated packages from additional repos. It seems to not be an issue in ubuntu 12 or 13.
– Jistanidiot
Aug 30 '13 at 11:11
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
So the problem seemed to be that I had a package installed from one of the normal apt repos and I wanted it to update with a version from one of the new repos. Apparently this is not possible. I had to uninstall the packages in question and then install with all of the normal repos commented out. I'm still not sure why when you do an apt-get update, that none of these new repos have their urls displayed.
1
You do not answer your own question. What you did here is not very clear, doesn't relate to your question and probably it should have been done by apt pinning.
– Johannes
Aug 29 '13 at 9:38
3
I only can tell you that this fixed the problem I was having when I asked the question. The other "answer" clearly didn't read my question and was totally useless. This is what worked for me. I don't know if it will work for anyone else. I assume it was some bug in ubuntu 11 that caused it not to use updated packages from additional repos. It seems to not be an issue in ubuntu 12 or 13.
– Jistanidiot
Aug 30 '13 at 11:11
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
So the problem seemed to be that I had a package installed from one of the normal apt repos and I wanted it to update with a version from one of the new repos. Apparently this is not possible. I had to uninstall the packages in question and then install with all of the normal repos commented out. I'm still not sure why when you do an apt-get update, that none of these new repos have their urls displayed.
So the problem seemed to be that I had a package installed from one of the normal apt repos and I wanted it to update with a version from one of the new repos. Apparently this is not possible. I had to uninstall the packages in question and then install with all of the normal repos commented out. I'm still not sure why when you do an apt-get update, that none of these new repos have their urls displayed.
answered Aug 29 '13 at 8:14
Jistanidiot
2661212
2661212
1
You do not answer your own question. What you did here is not very clear, doesn't relate to your question and probably it should have been done by apt pinning.
– Johannes
Aug 29 '13 at 9:38
3
I only can tell you that this fixed the problem I was having when I asked the question. The other "answer" clearly didn't read my question and was totally useless. This is what worked for me. I don't know if it will work for anyone else. I assume it was some bug in ubuntu 11 that caused it not to use updated packages from additional repos. It seems to not be an issue in ubuntu 12 or 13.
– Jistanidiot
Aug 30 '13 at 11:11
add a comment |
1
You do not answer your own question. What you did here is not very clear, doesn't relate to your question and probably it should have been done by apt pinning.
– Johannes
Aug 29 '13 at 9:38
3
I only can tell you that this fixed the problem I was having when I asked the question. The other "answer" clearly didn't read my question and was totally useless. This is what worked for me. I don't know if it will work for anyone else. I assume it was some bug in ubuntu 11 that caused it not to use updated packages from additional repos. It seems to not be an issue in ubuntu 12 or 13.
– Jistanidiot
Aug 30 '13 at 11:11
1
1
You do not answer your own question. What you did here is not very clear, doesn't relate to your question and probably it should have been done by apt pinning.
– Johannes
Aug 29 '13 at 9:38
You do not answer your own question. What you did here is not very clear, doesn't relate to your question and probably it should have been done by apt pinning.
– Johannes
Aug 29 '13 at 9:38
3
3
I only can tell you that this fixed the problem I was having when I asked the question. The other "answer" clearly didn't read my question and was totally useless. This is what worked for me. I don't know if it will work for anyone else. I assume it was some bug in ubuntu 11 that caused it not to use updated packages from additional repos. It seems to not be an issue in ubuntu 12 or 13.
– Jistanidiot
Aug 30 '13 at 11:11
I only can tell you that this fixed the problem I was having when I asked the question. The other "answer" clearly didn't read my question and was totally useless. This is what worked for me. I don't know if it will work for anyone else. I assume it was some bug in ubuntu 11 that caused it not to use updated packages from additional repos. It seems to not be an issue in ubuntu 12 or 13.
– Jistanidiot
Aug 30 '13 at 11:11
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Ask Ubuntu!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f190149%2fhow-do-you-tell-apt-to-use-files-in-etc-apt-sources-list-d%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
f98uLGatfhZ,RAo,LPFeOK yRIY t d3a UQOkvfVG33MR
1
You can dump the current apt configuration by using
apt-config dump
. There should be a line that saysDir::Etc::sourceparts "sources.list.d";
. Maybe this helps for further investigation.– phoibos
Sep 18 '12 at 12:30
You did
apt-get update
orsudo apt-get update
? How did you notice or confirm that, that repository is not enabled?– Anwar
Sep 18 '12 at 12:51
just copy the lines in
/etc/apt/sources.list
.– green
Sep 18 '12 at 14:03
So the problem seemed to be that I had a package installed from one of the normal apt repos and I wanted it to update with a version from one of the new repos. Apparently this is not possible. I had to uninstall the packages in question and then install with all of the normal repos commented out. I'm still not sure why when you do an apt-get update, that none of these new repos have their urls displayed.
– Jistanidiot
Sep 25 '12 at 15:10