How do you tell apt to use files in /etc/apt/sources.list.d











up vote
16
down vote

favorite
2












I added a repo by putting a file in



 /etc/apt/sources.list.d 


and then i did an



 apt-get update.  


However it didn't do anything with that repo. I then noticed that it didn't appear to be including any of the repos in that directory. Only stuff in /etc/apt/sources.list seem to be noticed by apt-get. All the files in the directory end in .list and contain something like:



 virtualbox.list

deb http://download.virtualbox.org/virtualbox/debian oneiric contrib

pj-assis-ppa-oneiric.list

deb http://ppa.launchpad.net/pj-assis/ppa/ubuntu oneiric main
deb-src http://ppa.launchpad.net/pj-assis/ppa/ubuntu oneiric main


Do I need to put some sort of include statement in /etc/apt/sources.list?



I'm using kubuntu 11.10.










share|improve this question




















  • 1




    You can dump the current apt configuration by using apt-config dump. There should be a line that says Dir::Etc::sourceparts "sources.list.d";. Maybe this helps for further investigation.
    – phoibos
    Sep 18 '12 at 12:30










  • You did apt-get update or sudo apt-get update? How did you notice or confirm that, that repository is not enabled?
    – Anwar
    Sep 18 '12 at 12:51










  • just copy the lines in /etc/apt/sources.list.
    – green
    Sep 18 '12 at 14:03










  • So the problem seemed to be that I had a package installed from one of the normal apt repos and I wanted it to update with a version from one of the new repos. Apparently this is not possible. I had to uninstall the packages in question and then install with all of the normal repos commented out. I'm still not sure why when you do an apt-get update, that none of these new repos have their urls displayed.
    – Jistanidiot
    Sep 25 '12 at 15:10

















up vote
16
down vote

favorite
2












I added a repo by putting a file in



 /etc/apt/sources.list.d 


and then i did an



 apt-get update.  


However it didn't do anything with that repo. I then noticed that it didn't appear to be including any of the repos in that directory. Only stuff in /etc/apt/sources.list seem to be noticed by apt-get. All the files in the directory end in .list and contain something like:



 virtualbox.list

deb http://download.virtualbox.org/virtualbox/debian oneiric contrib

pj-assis-ppa-oneiric.list

deb http://ppa.launchpad.net/pj-assis/ppa/ubuntu oneiric main
deb-src http://ppa.launchpad.net/pj-assis/ppa/ubuntu oneiric main


Do I need to put some sort of include statement in /etc/apt/sources.list?



I'm using kubuntu 11.10.










share|improve this question




















  • 1




    You can dump the current apt configuration by using apt-config dump. There should be a line that says Dir::Etc::sourceparts "sources.list.d";. Maybe this helps for further investigation.
    – phoibos
    Sep 18 '12 at 12:30










  • You did apt-get update or sudo apt-get update? How did you notice or confirm that, that repository is not enabled?
    – Anwar
    Sep 18 '12 at 12:51










  • just copy the lines in /etc/apt/sources.list.
    – green
    Sep 18 '12 at 14:03










  • So the problem seemed to be that I had a package installed from one of the normal apt repos and I wanted it to update with a version from one of the new repos. Apparently this is not possible. I had to uninstall the packages in question and then install with all of the normal repos commented out. I'm still not sure why when you do an apt-get update, that none of these new repos have their urls displayed.
    – Jistanidiot
    Sep 25 '12 at 15:10















up vote
16
down vote

favorite
2









up vote
16
down vote

favorite
2






2





I added a repo by putting a file in



 /etc/apt/sources.list.d 


and then i did an



 apt-get update.  


However it didn't do anything with that repo. I then noticed that it didn't appear to be including any of the repos in that directory. Only stuff in /etc/apt/sources.list seem to be noticed by apt-get. All the files in the directory end in .list and contain something like:



 virtualbox.list

deb http://download.virtualbox.org/virtualbox/debian oneiric contrib

pj-assis-ppa-oneiric.list

deb http://ppa.launchpad.net/pj-assis/ppa/ubuntu oneiric main
deb-src http://ppa.launchpad.net/pj-assis/ppa/ubuntu oneiric main


Do I need to put some sort of include statement in /etc/apt/sources.list?



I'm using kubuntu 11.10.










share|improve this question















I added a repo by putting a file in



 /etc/apt/sources.list.d 


and then i did an



 apt-get update.  


However it didn't do anything with that repo. I then noticed that it didn't appear to be including any of the repos in that directory. Only stuff in /etc/apt/sources.list seem to be noticed by apt-get. All the files in the directory end in .list and contain something like:



 virtualbox.list

deb http://download.virtualbox.org/virtualbox/debian oneiric contrib

pj-assis-ppa-oneiric.list

deb http://ppa.launchpad.net/pj-assis/ppa/ubuntu oneiric main
deb-src http://ppa.launchpad.net/pj-assis/ppa/ubuntu oneiric main


Do I need to put some sort of include statement in /etc/apt/sources.list?



I'm using kubuntu 11.10.







apt repository






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Sep 18 '12 at 13:12









Jorge Castro

35.6k105422617




35.6k105422617










asked Sep 18 '12 at 11:36









Jistanidiot

2661212




2661212








  • 1




    You can dump the current apt configuration by using apt-config dump. There should be a line that says Dir::Etc::sourceparts "sources.list.d";. Maybe this helps for further investigation.
    – phoibos
    Sep 18 '12 at 12:30










  • You did apt-get update or sudo apt-get update? How did you notice or confirm that, that repository is not enabled?
    – Anwar
    Sep 18 '12 at 12:51










  • just copy the lines in /etc/apt/sources.list.
    – green
    Sep 18 '12 at 14:03










  • So the problem seemed to be that I had a package installed from one of the normal apt repos and I wanted it to update with a version from one of the new repos. Apparently this is not possible. I had to uninstall the packages in question and then install with all of the normal repos commented out. I'm still not sure why when you do an apt-get update, that none of these new repos have their urls displayed.
    – Jistanidiot
    Sep 25 '12 at 15:10
















  • 1




    You can dump the current apt configuration by using apt-config dump. There should be a line that says Dir::Etc::sourceparts "sources.list.d";. Maybe this helps for further investigation.
    – phoibos
    Sep 18 '12 at 12:30










  • You did apt-get update or sudo apt-get update? How did you notice or confirm that, that repository is not enabled?
    – Anwar
    Sep 18 '12 at 12:51










  • just copy the lines in /etc/apt/sources.list.
    – green
    Sep 18 '12 at 14:03










  • So the problem seemed to be that I had a package installed from one of the normal apt repos and I wanted it to update with a version from one of the new repos. Apparently this is not possible. I had to uninstall the packages in question and then install with all of the normal repos commented out. I'm still not sure why when you do an apt-get update, that none of these new repos have their urls displayed.
    – Jistanidiot
    Sep 25 '12 at 15:10










1




1




You can dump the current apt configuration by using apt-config dump. There should be a line that says Dir::Etc::sourceparts "sources.list.d";. Maybe this helps for further investigation.
– phoibos
Sep 18 '12 at 12:30




You can dump the current apt configuration by using apt-config dump. There should be a line that says Dir::Etc::sourceparts "sources.list.d";. Maybe this helps for further investigation.
– phoibos
Sep 18 '12 at 12:30












You did apt-get update or sudo apt-get update? How did you notice or confirm that, that repository is not enabled?
– Anwar
Sep 18 '12 at 12:51




You did apt-get update or sudo apt-get update? How did you notice or confirm that, that repository is not enabled?
– Anwar
Sep 18 '12 at 12:51












just copy the lines in /etc/apt/sources.list.
– green
Sep 18 '12 at 14:03




just copy the lines in /etc/apt/sources.list.
– green
Sep 18 '12 at 14:03












So the problem seemed to be that I had a package installed from one of the normal apt repos and I wanted it to update with a version from one of the new repos. Apparently this is not possible. I had to uninstall the packages in question and then install with all of the normal repos commented out. I'm still not sure why when you do an apt-get update, that none of these new repos have their urls displayed.
– Jistanidiot
Sep 25 '12 at 15:10






So the problem seemed to be that I had a package installed from one of the normal apt repos and I wanted it to update with a version from one of the new repos. Apparently this is not possible. I had to uninstall the packages in question and then install with all of the normal repos commented out. I'm still not sure why when you do an apt-get update, that none of these new repos have their urls displayed.
– Jistanidiot
Sep 25 '12 at 15:10












2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
11
down vote













The names of files in /etc/sources.list.d must end in .list, if they are to be included as software sources.



As the man page of sources.list says:




DESCRIPTION



   The package resource list is used to locate archives of the package
distribution system in use on the system. At this time, this manual
page documents only the packaging system used by the Debian GNU/Linux
system. This control file is /etc/apt/sources.list.

The source list is designed to support any number of active sources and
a variety of source media. The file lists one source per line, with the
most preferred source listed first. The format of each line is: type
uri args The first item, type determines the format for args. uri is a
Universal Resource Identifier (URI), which is a superset of the more
specific and well-known Universal Resource Locator, or URL. The rest of
the line can be marked as a comment by using a #.


SOURCES.LIST.D



   The /etc/apt/sources.list.d directory provides a way to add
sources.list entries in separate files. The format is the same as for
the regular sources.list file. File names need to end with .list and
may only contain letters (a-z and A-Z), digits (0-9), underscore (_),
hyphen (-) and period (.) characters. Otherwise APT will print a notice
that it has ignored a file if the file doesn't match a pattern in the
Dir::Ignore-Files-Silently configuration list - in this case it will be
silently ignored.



Taking an example from this page, suppose you wanted to install chef (from opscode), what you'd do is:




  • Create and open a file named opscode.list:



sudo vim /etc/apt/sources.list.d/opscode.list



  • Add the required line and save the file:



deb http://apt.opscode.com/ oneiric main


The above steps can be combined to make a single command:



sudo /bin/sh -c 'echo "deb http://apt.opscode.com/ onereic main" > /etc/apt/sources.list.d/opscode.list'


Note: The command contains onereic because the codename of the Ubuntu you're using is Onereic. Had you been using Precise (12.04), you'd have writter precise.






share|improve this answer



















  • 5




    Have you read the OP? He does all these steps.
    – January
    Sep 18 '12 at 11:55










  • He did not specify, what file he added.
    – green
    Sep 18 '12 at 13:10






  • 1




    He did give two names (virtualbox.list and another one)
    – January
    Sep 18 '12 at 13:14


















up vote
3
down vote



accepted










So the problem seemed to be that I had a package installed from one of the normal apt repos and I wanted it to update with a version from one of the new repos. Apparently this is not possible. I had to uninstall the packages in question and then install with all of the normal repos commented out. I'm still not sure why when you do an apt-get update, that none of these new repos have their urls displayed.






share|improve this answer

















  • 1




    You do not answer your own question. What you did here is not very clear, doesn't relate to your question and probably it should have been done by apt pinning.
    – Johannes
    Aug 29 '13 at 9:38








  • 3




    I only can tell you that this fixed the problem I was having when I asked the question. The other "answer" clearly didn't read my question and was totally useless. This is what worked for me. I don't know if it will work for anyone else. I assume it was some bug in ubuntu 11 that caused it not to use updated packages from additional repos. It seems to not be an issue in ubuntu 12 or 13.
    – Jistanidiot
    Aug 30 '13 at 11:11













Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "89"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f190149%2fhow-do-you-tell-apt-to-use-files-in-etc-apt-sources-list-d%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
11
down vote













The names of files in /etc/sources.list.d must end in .list, if they are to be included as software sources.



As the man page of sources.list says:




DESCRIPTION



   The package resource list is used to locate archives of the package
distribution system in use on the system. At this time, this manual
page documents only the packaging system used by the Debian GNU/Linux
system. This control file is /etc/apt/sources.list.

The source list is designed to support any number of active sources and
a variety of source media. The file lists one source per line, with the
most preferred source listed first. The format of each line is: type
uri args The first item, type determines the format for args. uri is a
Universal Resource Identifier (URI), which is a superset of the more
specific and well-known Universal Resource Locator, or URL. The rest of
the line can be marked as a comment by using a #.


SOURCES.LIST.D



   The /etc/apt/sources.list.d directory provides a way to add
sources.list entries in separate files. The format is the same as for
the regular sources.list file. File names need to end with .list and
may only contain letters (a-z and A-Z), digits (0-9), underscore (_),
hyphen (-) and period (.) characters. Otherwise APT will print a notice
that it has ignored a file if the file doesn't match a pattern in the
Dir::Ignore-Files-Silently configuration list - in this case it will be
silently ignored.



Taking an example from this page, suppose you wanted to install chef (from opscode), what you'd do is:




  • Create and open a file named opscode.list:



sudo vim /etc/apt/sources.list.d/opscode.list



  • Add the required line and save the file:



deb http://apt.opscode.com/ oneiric main


The above steps can be combined to make a single command:



sudo /bin/sh -c 'echo "deb http://apt.opscode.com/ onereic main" > /etc/apt/sources.list.d/opscode.list'


Note: The command contains onereic because the codename of the Ubuntu you're using is Onereic. Had you been using Precise (12.04), you'd have writter precise.






share|improve this answer



















  • 5




    Have you read the OP? He does all these steps.
    – January
    Sep 18 '12 at 11:55










  • He did not specify, what file he added.
    – green
    Sep 18 '12 at 13:10






  • 1




    He did give two names (virtualbox.list and another one)
    – January
    Sep 18 '12 at 13:14















up vote
11
down vote













The names of files in /etc/sources.list.d must end in .list, if they are to be included as software sources.



As the man page of sources.list says:




DESCRIPTION



   The package resource list is used to locate archives of the package
distribution system in use on the system. At this time, this manual
page documents only the packaging system used by the Debian GNU/Linux
system. This control file is /etc/apt/sources.list.

The source list is designed to support any number of active sources and
a variety of source media. The file lists one source per line, with the
most preferred source listed first. The format of each line is: type
uri args The first item, type determines the format for args. uri is a
Universal Resource Identifier (URI), which is a superset of the more
specific and well-known Universal Resource Locator, or URL. The rest of
the line can be marked as a comment by using a #.


SOURCES.LIST.D



   The /etc/apt/sources.list.d directory provides a way to add
sources.list entries in separate files. The format is the same as for
the regular sources.list file. File names need to end with .list and
may only contain letters (a-z and A-Z), digits (0-9), underscore (_),
hyphen (-) and period (.) characters. Otherwise APT will print a notice
that it has ignored a file if the file doesn't match a pattern in the
Dir::Ignore-Files-Silently configuration list - in this case it will be
silently ignored.



Taking an example from this page, suppose you wanted to install chef (from opscode), what you'd do is:




  • Create and open a file named opscode.list:



sudo vim /etc/apt/sources.list.d/opscode.list



  • Add the required line and save the file:



deb http://apt.opscode.com/ oneiric main


The above steps can be combined to make a single command:



sudo /bin/sh -c 'echo "deb http://apt.opscode.com/ onereic main" > /etc/apt/sources.list.d/opscode.list'


Note: The command contains onereic because the codename of the Ubuntu you're using is Onereic. Had you been using Precise (12.04), you'd have writter precise.






share|improve this answer



















  • 5




    Have you read the OP? He does all these steps.
    – January
    Sep 18 '12 at 11:55










  • He did not specify, what file he added.
    – green
    Sep 18 '12 at 13:10






  • 1




    He did give two names (virtualbox.list and another one)
    – January
    Sep 18 '12 at 13:14













up vote
11
down vote










up vote
11
down vote









The names of files in /etc/sources.list.d must end in .list, if they are to be included as software sources.



As the man page of sources.list says:




DESCRIPTION



   The package resource list is used to locate archives of the package
distribution system in use on the system. At this time, this manual
page documents only the packaging system used by the Debian GNU/Linux
system. This control file is /etc/apt/sources.list.

The source list is designed to support any number of active sources and
a variety of source media. The file lists one source per line, with the
most preferred source listed first. The format of each line is: type
uri args The first item, type determines the format for args. uri is a
Universal Resource Identifier (URI), which is a superset of the more
specific and well-known Universal Resource Locator, or URL. The rest of
the line can be marked as a comment by using a #.


SOURCES.LIST.D



   The /etc/apt/sources.list.d directory provides a way to add
sources.list entries in separate files. The format is the same as for
the regular sources.list file. File names need to end with .list and
may only contain letters (a-z and A-Z), digits (0-9), underscore (_),
hyphen (-) and period (.) characters. Otherwise APT will print a notice
that it has ignored a file if the file doesn't match a pattern in the
Dir::Ignore-Files-Silently configuration list - in this case it will be
silently ignored.



Taking an example from this page, suppose you wanted to install chef (from opscode), what you'd do is:




  • Create and open a file named opscode.list:



sudo vim /etc/apt/sources.list.d/opscode.list



  • Add the required line and save the file:



deb http://apt.opscode.com/ oneiric main


The above steps can be combined to make a single command:



sudo /bin/sh -c 'echo "deb http://apt.opscode.com/ onereic main" > /etc/apt/sources.list.d/opscode.list'


Note: The command contains onereic because the codename of the Ubuntu you're using is Onereic. Had you been using Precise (12.04), you'd have writter precise.






share|improve this answer














The names of files in /etc/sources.list.d must end in .list, if they are to be included as software sources.



As the man page of sources.list says:




DESCRIPTION



   The package resource list is used to locate archives of the package
distribution system in use on the system. At this time, this manual
page documents only the packaging system used by the Debian GNU/Linux
system. This control file is /etc/apt/sources.list.

The source list is designed to support any number of active sources and
a variety of source media. The file lists one source per line, with the
most preferred source listed first. The format of each line is: type
uri args The first item, type determines the format for args. uri is a
Universal Resource Identifier (URI), which is a superset of the more
specific and well-known Universal Resource Locator, or URL. The rest of
the line can be marked as a comment by using a #.


SOURCES.LIST.D



   The /etc/apt/sources.list.d directory provides a way to add
sources.list entries in separate files. The format is the same as for
the regular sources.list file. File names need to end with .list and
may only contain letters (a-z and A-Z), digits (0-9), underscore (_),
hyphen (-) and period (.) characters. Otherwise APT will print a notice
that it has ignored a file if the file doesn't match a pattern in the
Dir::Ignore-Files-Silently configuration list - in this case it will be
silently ignored.



Taking an example from this page, suppose you wanted to install chef (from opscode), what you'd do is:




  • Create and open a file named opscode.list:



sudo vim /etc/apt/sources.list.d/opscode.list



  • Add the required line and save the file:



deb http://apt.opscode.com/ oneiric main


The above steps can be combined to make a single command:



sudo /bin/sh -c 'echo "deb http://apt.opscode.com/ onereic main" > /etc/apt/sources.list.d/opscode.list'


Note: The command contains onereic because the codename of the Ubuntu you're using is Onereic. Had you been using Precise (12.04), you'd have writter precise.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Nov 26 at 22:30









abu_bua

3,10081023




3,10081023










answered Sep 18 '12 at 11:41









green

11.7k43558




11.7k43558








  • 5




    Have you read the OP? He does all these steps.
    – January
    Sep 18 '12 at 11:55










  • He did not specify, what file he added.
    – green
    Sep 18 '12 at 13:10






  • 1




    He did give two names (virtualbox.list and another one)
    – January
    Sep 18 '12 at 13:14














  • 5




    Have you read the OP? He does all these steps.
    – January
    Sep 18 '12 at 11:55










  • He did not specify, what file he added.
    – green
    Sep 18 '12 at 13:10






  • 1




    He did give two names (virtualbox.list and another one)
    – January
    Sep 18 '12 at 13:14








5




5




Have you read the OP? He does all these steps.
– January
Sep 18 '12 at 11:55




Have you read the OP? He does all these steps.
– January
Sep 18 '12 at 11:55












He did not specify, what file he added.
– green
Sep 18 '12 at 13:10




He did not specify, what file he added.
– green
Sep 18 '12 at 13:10




1




1




He did give two names (virtualbox.list and another one)
– January
Sep 18 '12 at 13:14




He did give two names (virtualbox.list and another one)
– January
Sep 18 '12 at 13:14












up vote
3
down vote



accepted










So the problem seemed to be that I had a package installed from one of the normal apt repos and I wanted it to update with a version from one of the new repos. Apparently this is not possible. I had to uninstall the packages in question and then install with all of the normal repos commented out. I'm still not sure why when you do an apt-get update, that none of these new repos have their urls displayed.






share|improve this answer

















  • 1




    You do not answer your own question. What you did here is not very clear, doesn't relate to your question and probably it should have been done by apt pinning.
    – Johannes
    Aug 29 '13 at 9:38








  • 3




    I only can tell you that this fixed the problem I was having when I asked the question. The other "answer" clearly didn't read my question and was totally useless. This is what worked for me. I don't know if it will work for anyone else. I assume it was some bug in ubuntu 11 that caused it not to use updated packages from additional repos. It seems to not be an issue in ubuntu 12 or 13.
    – Jistanidiot
    Aug 30 '13 at 11:11

















up vote
3
down vote



accepted










So the problem seemed to be that I had a package installed from one of the normal apt repos and I wanted it to update with a version from one of the new repos. Apparently this is not possible. I had to uninstall the packages in question and then install with all of the normal repos commented out. I'm still not sure why when you do an apt-get update, that none of these new repos have their urls displayed.






share|improve this answer

















  • 1




    You do not answer your own question. What you did here is not very clear, doesn't relate to your question and probably it should have been done by apt pinning.
    – Johannes
    Aug 29 '13 at 9:38








  • 3




    I only can tell you that this fixed the problem I was having when I asked the question. The other "answer" clearly didn't read my question and was totally useless. This is what worked for me. I don't know if it will work for anyone else. I assume it was some bug in ubuntu 11 that caused it not to use updated packages from additional repos. It seems to not be an issue in ubuntu 12 or 13.
    – Jistanidiot
    Aug 30 '13 at 11:11















up vote
3
down vote



accepted







up vote
3
down vote



accepted






So the problem seemed to be that I had a package installed from one of the normal apt repos and I wanted it to update with a version from one of the new repos. Apparently this is not possible. I had to uninstall the packages in question and then install with all of the normal repos commented out. I'm still not sure why when you do an apt-get update, that none of these new repos have their urls displayed.






share|improve this answer












So the problem seemed to be that I had a package installed from one of the normal apt repos and I wanted it to update with a version from one of the new repos. Apparently this is not possible. I had to uninstall the packages in question and then install with all of the normal repos commented out. I'm still not sure why when you do an apt-get update, that none of these new repos have their urls displayed.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Aug 29 '13 at 8:14









Jistanidiot

2661212




2661212








  • 1




    You do not answer your own question. What you did here is not very clear, doesn't relate to your question and probably it should have been done by apt pinning.
    – Johannes
    Aug 29 '13 at 9:38








  • 3




    I only can tell you that this fixed the problem I was having when I asked the question. The other "answer" clearly didn't read my question and was totally useless. This is what worked for me. I don't know if it will work for anyone else. I assume it was some bug in ubuntu 11 that caused it not to use updated packages from additional repos. It seems to not be an issue in ubuntu 12 or 13.
    – Jistanidiot
    Aug 30 '13 at 11:11
















  • 1




    You do not answer your own question. What you did here is not very clear, doesn't relate to your question and probably it should have been done by apt pinning.
    – Johannes
    Aug 29 '13 at 9:38








  • 3




    I only can tell you that this fixed the problem I was having when I asked the question. The other "answer" clearly didn't read my question and was totally useless. This is what worked for me. I don't know if it will work for anyone else. I assume it was some bug in ubuntu 11 that caused it not to use updated packages from additional repos. It seems to not be an issue in ubuntu 12 or 13.
    – Jistanidiot
    Aug 30 '13 at 11:11










1




1




You do not answer your own question. What you did here is not very clear, doesn't relate to your question and probably it should have been done by apt pinning.
– Johannes
Aug 29 '13 at 9:38






You do not answer your own question. What you did here is not very clear, doesn't relate to your question and probably it should have been done by apt pinning.
– Johannes
Aug 29 '13 at 9:38






3




3




I only can tell you that this fixed the problem I was having when I asked the question. The other "answer" clearly didn't read my question and was totally useless. This is what worked for me. I don't know if it will work for anyone else. I assume it was some bug in ubuntu 11 that caused it not to use updated packages from additional repos. It seems to not be an issue in ubuntu 12 or 13.
– Jistanidiot
Aug 30 '13 at 11:11






I only can tell you that this fixed the problem I was having when I asked the question. The other "answer" clearly didn't read my question and was totally useless. This is what worked for me. I don't know if it will work for anyone else. I assume it was some bug in ubuntu 11 that caused it not to use updated packages from additional repos. It seems to not be an issue in ubuntu 12 or 13.
– Jistanidiot
Aug 30 '13 at 11:11




















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Ask Ubuntu!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f190149%2fhow-do-you-tell-apt-to-use-files-in-etc-apt-sources-list-d%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Quarter-circle Tiles

build a pushdown automaton that recognizes the reverse language of a given pushdown automaton?

Mont Emei