proving inequality through convexity and continuity











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












Suppose $f$ is a continuous function. Prove $f$ is convex iff this inequality holds:
$$
frac{f(x)+f(y)+f(z)}{3} + f(frac{x+y+z}{3}) ge frac{2}{3}[f(frac{x+y}{2}) +f(frac{y+z}{2}) +f(frac{z+x}{2})]
$$



if we move all the terms to the left hand side, we'll have:
$$
frac{f(x)+f(y)+f(z)}{3} + f(frac{x+y+z}{3})-frac{2}{3}[f(frac{x+y}{2}) +f(frac{y+z}{2}) +f(frac{z+x}{2})] ge 0
$$

I tried to prove this statement with this assumption that f is convex. First, I used the definition of convexity for each terms of the right hand side:
$$f(frac{x+y}{2})le frac{1}{2}f(x)+frac{1}{2}f(y)$$
$$f(frac{y+z}{2})le frac{1}{2}f(y)+frac{1}{2}f(z)$$
$$f(frac{z+x}{2})le frac{1}{2}f(z)+frac{1}{2}f(x)$$
$$Longrightarrow f(frac{x+y}{2}) +f(frac{y+z}{2}) +f(frac{z+x}{2}) le f(x)+f(y)+f(z)
$$

Then after using definition for $f(x)+f(y)+f(z)/3$ and replacing above statement in the main inequality, I obtained:
$$
frac{f(x)+f(y)+f(z)}{3} + f(frac{x+y+z}{3})-frac{2}{3}[f(frac{x+y}{2}) +f(frac{y+z}{2}) +f(frac{z+x}{2})] ge f(frac{x+y+z}{3})-frac{f(x)+f(y)+f(z)}{3}
$$

According to the convexity of $f$, the later expression must be nonpositive but our purpose is to prove it is nonnegative. It seems we encounter with a contradiction! I tried other types of convex combinations, but I just obtained either of parts are greater or smaller than a same term, for example this one:



first part:$$frac{f(x)+f(y)+f(z)}{3} + f(frac{x+y+z}{3}) ge 2f(frac{x+y+z}{3})$$
second part:$$2[frac{1}{3}f(frac{x+y}{2}) +frac{1}{3}f(frac{y+z}{2}) +frac{1}{3}f(frac{z+x}{2})] ge 2f(frac{x+y+z}{3})$$



I think it needs to obtain a tighter bound or maybe some new information about continuous convex functions.










share|cite|improve this question




























    up vote
    1
    down vote

    favorite












    Suppose $f$ is a continuous function. Prove $f$ is convex iff this inequality holds:
    $$
    frac{f(x)+f(y)+f(z)}{3} + f(frac{x+y+z}{3}) ge frac{2}{3}[f(frac{x+y}{2}) +f(frac{y+z}{2}) +f(frac{z+x}{2})]
    $$



    if we move all the terms to the left hand side, we'll have:
    $$
    frac{f(x)+f(y)+f(z)}{3} + f(frac{x+y+z}{3})-frac{2}{3}[f(frac{x+y}{2}) +f(frac{y+z}{2}) +f(frac{z+x}{2})] ge 0
    $$

    I tried to prove this statement with this assumption that f is convex. First, I used the definition of convexity for each terms of the right hand side:
    $$f(frac{x+y}{2})le frac{1}{2}f(x)+frac{1}{2}f(y)$$
    $$f(frac{y+z}{2})le frac{1}{2}f(y)+frac{1}{2}f(z)$$
    $$f(frac{z+x}{2})le frac{1}{2}f(z)+frac{1}{2}f(x)$$
    $$Longrightarrow f(frac{x+y}{2}) +f(frac{y+z}{2}) +f(frac{z+x}{2}) le f(x)+f(y)+f(z)
    $$

    Then after using definition for $f(x)+f(y)+f(z)/3$ and replacing above statement in the main inequality, I obtained:
    $$
    frac{f(x)+f(y)+f(z)}{3} + f(frac{x+y+z}{3})-frac{2}{3}[f(frac{x+y}{2}) +f(frac{y+z}{2}) +f(frac{z+x}{2})] ge f(frac{x+y+z}{3})-frac{f(x)+f(y)+f(z)}{3}
    $$

    According to the convexity of $f$, the later expression must be nonpositive but our purpose is to prove it is nonnegative. It seems we encounter with a contradiction! I tried other types of convex combinations, but I just obtained either of parts are greater or smaller than a same term, for example this one:



    first part:$$frac{f(x)+f(y)+f(z)}{3} + f(frac{x+y+z}{3}) ge 2f(frac{x+y+z}{3})$$
    second part:$$2[frac{1}{3}f(frac{x+y}{2}) +frac{1}{3}f(frac{y+z}{2}) +frac{1}{3}f(frac{z+x}{2})] ge 2f(frac{x+y+z}{3})$$



    I think it needs to obtain a tighter bound or maybe some new information about continuous convex functions.










    share|cite|improve this question


























      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite











      Suppose $f$ is a continuous function. Prove $f$ is convex iff this inequality holds:
      $$
      frac{f(x)+f(y)+f(z)}{3} + f(frac{x+y+z}{3}) ge frac{2}{3}[f(frac{x+y}{2}) +f(frac{y+z}{2}) +f(frac{z+x}{2})]
      $$



      if we move all the terms to the left hand side, we'll have:
      $$
      frac{f(x)+f(y)+f(z)}{3} + f(frac{x+y+z}{3})-frac{2}{3}[f(frac{x+y}{2}) +f(frac{y+z}{2}) +f(frac{z+x}{2})] ge 0
      $$

      I tried to prove this statement with this assumption that f is convex. First, I used the definition of convexity for each terms of the right hand side:
      $$f(frac{x+y}{2})le frac{1}{2}f(x)+frac{1}{2}f(y)$$
      $$f(frac{y+z}{2})le frac{1}{2}f(y)+frac{1}{2}f(z)$$
      $$f(frac{z+x}{2})le frac{1}{2}f(z)+frac{1}{2}f(x)$$
      $$Longrightarrow f(frac{x+y}{2}) +f(frac{y+z}{2}) +f(frac{z+x}{2}) le f(x)+f(y)+f(z)
      $$

      Then after using definition for $f(x)+f(y)+f(z)/3$ and replacing above statement in the main inequality, I obtained:
      $$
      frac{f(x)+f(y)+f(z)}{3} + f(frac{x+y+z}{3})-frac{2}{3}[f(frac{x+y}{2}) +f(frac{y+z}{2}) +f(frac{z+x}{2})] ge f(frac{x+y+z}{3})-frac{f(x)+f(y)+f(z)}{3}
      $$

      According to the convexity of $f$, the later expression must be nonpositive but our purpose is to prove it is nonnegative. It seems we encounter with a contradiction! I tried other types of convex combinations, but I just obtained either of parts are greater or smaller than a same term, for example this one:



      first part:$$frac{f(x)+f(y)+f(z)}{3} + f(frac{x+y+z}{3}) ge 2f(frac{x+y+z}{3})$$
      second part:$$2[frac{1}{3}f(frac{x+y}{2}) +frac{1}{3}f(frac{y+z}{2}) +frac{1}{3}f(frac{z+x}{2})] ge 2f(frac{x+y+z}{3})$$



      I think it needs to obtain a tighter bound or maybe some new information about continuous convex functions.










      share|cite|improve this question















      Suppose $f$ is a continuous function. Prove $f$ is convex iff this inequality holds:
      $$
      frac{f(x)+f(y)+f(z)}{3} + f(frac{x+y+z}{3}) ge frac{2}{3}[f(frac{x+y}{2}) +f(frac{y+z}{2}) +f(frac{z+x}{2})]
      $$



      if we move all the terms to the left hand side, we'll have:
      $$
      frac{f(x)+f(y)+f(z)}{3} + f(frac{x+y+z}{3})-frac{2}{3}[f(frac{x+y}{2}) +f(frac{y+z}{2}) +f(frac{z+x}{2})] ge 0
      $$

      I tried to prove this statement with this assumption that f is convex. First, I used the definition of convexity for each terms of the right hand side:
      $$f(frac{x+y}{2})le frac{1}{2}f(x)+frac{1}{2}f(y)$$
      $$f(frac{y+z}{2})le frac{1}{2}f(y)+frac{1}{2}f(z)$$
      $$f(frac{z+x}{2})le frac{1}{2}f(z)+frac{1}{2}f(x)$$
      $$Longrightarrow f(frac{x+y}{2}) +f(frac{y+z}{2}) +f(frac{z+x}{2}) le f(x)+f(y)+f(z)
      $$

      Then after using definition for $f(x)+f(y)+f(z)/3$ and replacing above statement in the main inequality, I obtained:
      $$
      frac{f(x)+f(y)+f(z)}{3} + f(frac{x+y+z}{3})-frac{2}{3}[f(frac{x+y}{2}) +f(frac{y+z}{2}) +f(frac{z+x}{2})] ge f(frac{x+y+z}{3})-frac{f(x)+f(y)+f(z)}{3}
      $$

      According to the convexity of $f$, the later expression must be nonpositive but our purpose is to prove it is nonnegative. It seems we encounter with a contradiction! I tried other types of convex combinations, but I just obtained either of parts are greater or smaller than a same term, for example this one:



      first part:$$frac{f(x)+f(y)+f(z)}{3} + f(frac{x+y+z}{3}) ge 2f(frac{x+y+z}{3})$$
      second part:$$2[frac{1}{3}f(frac{x+y}{2}) +frac{1}{3}f(frac{y+z}{2}) +frac{1}{3}f(frac{z+x}{2})] ge 2f(frac{x+y+z}{3})$$



      I think it needs to obtain a tighter bound or maybe some new information about continuous convex functions.







      proof-verification convex-analysis convexity-inequality






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Nov 22 at 10:12

























      asked Nov 20 at 15:45









      F.Chi

      93




      93






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          0
          down vote













          This is not true for functions $f:mathbb R^n to mathbb R$ for $nge2$:



          Take a convex function that is zero on the boundary of the triangle $(x,y,x)$ but negative in barycenter $(x+y+z)/3$.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3006480%2fproving-inequality-through-convexity-and-continuity%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes








            up vote
            0
            down vote













            This is not true for functions $f:mathbb R^n to mathbb R$ for $nge2$:



            Take a convex function that is zero on the boundary of the triangle $(x,y,x)$ but negative in barycenter $(x+y+z)/3$.






            share|cite|improve this answer

























              up vote
              0
              down vote













              This is not true for functions $f:mathbb R^n to mathbb R$ for $nge2$:



              Take a convex function that is zero on the boundary of the triangle $(x,y,x)$ but negative in barycenter $(x+y+z)/3$.






              share|cite|improve this answer























                up vote
                0
                down vote










                up vote
                0
                down vote









                This is not true for functions $f:mathbb R^n to mathbb R$ for $nge2$:



                Take a convex function that is zero on the boundary of the triangle $(x,y,x)$ but negative in barycenter $(x+y+z)/3$.






                share|cite|improve this answer












                This is not true for functions $f:mathbb R^n to mathbb R$ for $nge2$:



                Take a convex function that is zero on the boundary of the triangle $(x,y,x)$ but negative in barycenter $(x+y+z)/3$.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Nov 22 at 13:41









                daw

                23.9k1544




                23.9k1544






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                    Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                    Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3006480%2fproving-inequality-through-convexity-and-continuity%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Quarter-circle Tiles

                    build a pushdown automaton that recognizes the reverse language of a given pushdown automaton?

                    Mont Emei