Is “Oh my Gosh” used as an anti-God expression? [on hold]











up vote
15
down vote

favorite












There is a tendency in traditionally Christian societies (grossly speaking, the West) to leave behind words or expression which allude to such heritage or faith. A familiar example is CE and BCE instead of AD and BC. I'm interested here with the case of "Oh my Gosh", which is used instead of "Oh my God".



Now, according to this answer, the first time this word was used as replacement for God was in the 16th century by Nicholas Udall, who was himself a religious person (at one point he became a vicar, actually). So, although not in its origin, has the use of such word become as an expression of anti-theism? By anti-theism I mean the rejection of theism, not confined to but exemplified by atheism.










share|improve this question













put on hold as primarily opinion-based by user240918, J. Taylor, Skooba, choster, jimm101 1 hour ago


Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.











  • 3




    Possibly a good question for: christianity.stackexchange.com
    – user240918
    18 hours ago








  • 37




    Some Christians I've known consider "oh my god" to be "taking the Lord's name in vain", which the bible prohibits. So you may find religious people using it for this reason. Also, as you point out, there are people who want to avoid referencing god at all, as a rejection of religion. I have no idea which are more common.
    – AndyT
    17 hours ago






  • 3




    @AndyT I suspect there are more Christian English speakers than English speakers who choose to reject religion to the point of never saying /gad/. (lazy IPA)
    – Azor Ahai
    9 hours ago






  • 7




    Is there any evidence of anyone who does this out of an anti-theistic persuasion? I've never met an atheist who avoids the G word on principle and I'd think this would be a very, very unusual view to take.
    – tmgr
    9 hours ago






  • 5




    Here and for the last 50 years at least, I would say that little kids say that phrase routinely years before they even realize that gosh isn't a synonym of goodness or something like that. That phrase is just too common here; you could say oh, my word, and no one would think of a word, not any word. They're mostly just sayings here now (US, SE Region).
    – KannE
    8 hours ago















up vote
15
down vote

favorite












There is a tendency in traditionally Christian societies (grossly speaking, the West) to leave behind words or expression which allude to such heritage or faith. A familiar example is CE and BCE instead of AD and BC. I'm interested here with the case of "Oh my Gosh", which is used instead of "Oh my God".



Now, according to this answer, the first time this word was used as replacement for God was in the 16th century by Nicholas Udall, who was himself a religious person (at one point he became a vicar, actually). So, although not in its origin, has the use of such word become as an expression of anti-theism? By anti-theism I mean the rejection of theism, not confined to but exemplified by atheism.










share|improve this question













put on hold as primarily opinion-based by user240918, J. Taylor, Skooba, choster, jimm101 1 hour ago


Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.











  • 3




    Possibly a good question for: christianity.stackexchange.com
    – user240918
    18 hours ago








  • 37




    Some Christians I've known consider "oh my god" to be "taking the Lord's name in vain", which the bible prohibits. So you may find religious people using it for this reason. Also, as you point out, there are people who want to avoid referencing god at all, as a rejection of religion. I have no idea which are more common.
    – AndyT
    17 hours ago






  • 3




    @AndyT I suspect there are more Christian English speakers than English speakers who choose to reject religion to the point of never saying /gad/. (lazy IPA)
    – Azor Ahai
    9 hours ago






  • 7




    Is there any evidence of anyone who does this out of an anti-theistic persuasion? I've never met an atheist who avoids the G word on principle and I'd think this would be a very, very unusual view to take.
    – tmgr
    9 hours ago






  • 5




    Here and for the last 50 years at least, I would say that little kids say that phrase routinely years before they even realize that gosh isn't a synonym of goodness or something like that. That phrase is just too common here; you could say oh, my word, and no one would think of a word, not any word. They're mostly just sayings here now (US, SE Region).
    – KannE
    8 hours ago













up vote
15
down vote

favorite









up vote
15
down vote

favorite











There is a tendency in traditionally Christian societies (grossly speaking, the West) to leave behind words or expression which allude to such heritage or faith. A familiar example is CE and BCE instead of AD and BC. I'm interested here with the case of "Oh my Gosh", which is used instead of "Oh my God".



Now, according to this answer, the first time this word was used as replacement for God was in the 16th century by Nicholas Udall, who was himself a religious person (at one point he became a vicar, actually). So, although not in its origin, has the use of such word become as an expression of anti-theism? By anti-theism I mean the rejection of theism, not confined to but exemplified by atheism.










share|improve this question













There is a tendency in traditionally Christian societies (grossly speaking, the West) to leave behind words or expression which allude to such heritage or faith. A familiar example is CE and BCE instead of AD and BC. I'm interested here with the case of "Oh my Gosh", which is used instead of "Oh my God".



Now, according to this answer, the first time this word was used as replacement for God was in the 16th century by Nicholas Udall, who was himself a religious person (at one point he became a vicar, actually). So, although not in its origin, has the use of such word become as an expression of anti-theism? By anti-theism I mean the rejection of theism, not confined to but exemplified by atheism.







expressions contemporary-english






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 18 hours ago









luchonacho

8661723




8661723




put on hold as primarily opinion-based by user240918, J. Taylor, Skooba, choster, jimm101 1 hour ago


Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.






put on hold as primarily opinion-based by user240918, J. Taylor, Skooba, choster, jimm101 1 hour ago


Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.










  • 3




    Possibly a good question for: christianity.stackexchange.com
    – user240918
    18 hours ago








  • 37




    Some Christians I've known consider "oh my god" to be "taking the Lord's name in vain", which the bible prohibits. So you may find religious people using it for this reason. Also, as you point out, there are people who want to avoid referencing god at all, as a rejection of religion. I have no idea which are more common.
    – AndyT
    17 hours ago






  • 3




    @AndyT I suspect there are more Christian English speakers than English speakers who choose to reject religion to the point of never saying /gad/. (lazy IPA)
    – Azor Ahai
    9 hours ago






  • 7




    Is there any evidence of anyone who does this out of an anti-theistic persuasion? I've never met an atheist who avoids the G word on principle and I'd think this would be a very, very unusual view to take.
    – tmgr
    9 hours ago






  • 5




    Here and for the last 50 years at least, I would say that little kids say that phrase routinely years before they even realize that gosh isn't a synonym of goodness or something like that. That phrase is just too common here; you could say oh, my word, and no one would think of a word, not any word. They're mostly just sayings here now (US, SE Region).
    – KannE
    8 hours ago














  • 3




    Possibly a good question for: christianity.stackexchange.com
    – user240918
    18 hours ago








  • 37




    Some Christians I've known consider "oh my god" to be "taking the Lord's name in vain", which the bible prohibits. So you may find religious people using it for this reason. Also, as you point out, there are people who want to avoid referencing god at all, as a rejection of religion. I have no idea which are more common.
    – AndyT
    17 hours ago






  • 3




    @AndyT I suspect there are more Christian English speakers than English speakers who choose to reject religion to the point of never saying /gad/. (lazy IPA)
    – Azor Ahai
    9 hours ago






  • 7




    Is there any evidence of anyone who does this out of an anti-theistic persuasion? I've never met an atheist who avoids the G word on principle and I'd think this would be a very, very unusual view to take.
    – tmgr
    9 hours ago






  • 5




    Here and for the last 50 years at least, I would say that little kids say that phrase routinely years before they even realize that gosh isn't a synonym of goodness or something like that. That phrase is just too common here; you could say oh, my word, and no one would think of a word, not any word. They're mostly just sayings here now (US, SE Region).
    – KannE
    8 hours ago








3




3




Possibly a good question for: christianity.stackexchange.com
– user240918
18 hours ago






Possibly a good question for: christianity.stackexchange.com
– user240918
18 hours ago






37




37




Some Christians I've known consider "oh my god" to be "taking the Lord's name in vain", which the bible prohibits. So you may find religious people using it for this reason. Also, as you point out, there are people who want to avoid referencing god at all, as a rejection of religion. I have no idea which are more common.
– AndyT
17 hours ago




Some Christians I've known consider "oh my god" to be "taking the Lord's name in vain", which the bible prohibits. So you may find religious people using it for this reason. Also, as you point out, there are people who want to avoid referencing god at all, as a rejection of religion. I have no idea which are more common.
– AndyT
17 hours ago




3




3




@AndyT I suspect there are more Christian English speakers than English speakers who choose to reject religion to the point of never saying /gad/. (lazy IPA)
– Azor Ahai
9 hours ago




@AndyT I suspect there are more Christian English speakers than English speakers who choose to reject religion to the point of never saying /gad/. (lazy IPA)
– Azor Ahai
9 hours ago




7




7




Is there any evidence of anyone who does this out of an anti-theistic persuasion? I've never met an atheist who avoids the G word on principle and I'd think this would be a very, very unusual view to take.
– tmgr
9 hours ago




Is there any evidence of anyone who does this out of an anti-theistic persuasion? I've never met an atheist who avoids the G word on principle and I'd think this would be a very, very unusual view to take.
– tmgr
9 hours ago




5




5




Here and for the last 50 years at least, I would say that little kids say that phrase routinely years before they even realize that gosh isn't a synonym of goodness or something like that. That phrase is just too common here; you could say oh, my word, and no one would think of a word, not any word. They're mostly just sayings here now (US, SE Region).
– KannE
8 hours ago




Here and for the last 50 years at least, I would say that little kids say that phrase routinely years before they even realize that gosh isn't a synonym of goodness or something like that. That phrase is just too common here; you could say oh, my word, and no one would think of a word, not any word. They're mostly just sayings here now (US, SE Region).
– KannE
8 hours ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
72
down vote













Quite the reverse. It's an example of a 'minced oath', where a similar-sounding word is substituted for the name of God in an expletive so as to avoid blasphemy. In 19th-century fiction, if a 'bad' character swore it would frequently be written as 'By G-d' or 'D-n you', as swearing was considered so offensive in polite society. Nowadays, I've noticed that some people use religious oaths meaninglessly without caring that they are offensive to believers.






share|improve this answer

















  • 18




    I've noticed that some people use religious oaths meaninglessly without caring that they are offensive to believers Many simply don't know that what they're saying causes offence, for them it's simply part of the patios they grew up speaking and would be bemused if told that their mode of expression is offensive to some.
    – Binary Worrier
    11 hours ago






  • 6




    There's a sea captain in the operetta HMS Pinafore (1878) who claims as a point of pride that he "never uses a big, big D". Of course, he does say "damn" towards the end, and everyone is shocked.
    – Michael Seifert
    11 hours ago






  • 7




    "without caring that they are offensive to believers" They might not be offensive to believers any more though.
    – thosphor
    10 hours ago






  • 4




    "Look, I don't think it ought to be blasphemy, just saying 'Jehova'."
    – MichaelK
    9 hours ago






  • 2




    As a person who was raised Catholic, I can attest that this phrase comes from a place of respect for Christianity. One of the ten commandments is 'Do not take the Lord's name in vain', and stating "Oh my God!" would break that rule. Hence, we have such phrases as "Oh my Gosh", "Jiminy Christmas" and "Geeze Louise". Another early example is "Gazzooks!" which was originally "God's hooks" (a phrase that was hot in the middle ages).
    – Megan Sullivan
    7 hours ago


















up vote
-5
down vote













The expression ''Oh my God'' is actually offensive because it uses the Lord's name in vain which the Bible prohibits. I am a Christian myself, and the Christians I know wouldn't dare say this expression ever. ''Oh Lord'' is on the edge too.






share|improve this answer








New contributor




DebbieCakes122 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.














  • 3




    This is confusing as god's name isn't god. His proper name is Yahweh. The original Hebrew is pretty specific about this.
    – Skek Tek
    5 hours ago








  • 4




    @SkekTek Actually, the Hebrew, original or otherwise, isn't specific about the pronunciation at all. Even more confusing, perhaps.
    – tmgr
    5 hours ago






  • 4




    Debbie, this doesn't answer the question, which is not about "Oh my god", it's about "Oh my gosh" and whether that expression is used as a rejection of the belief in god. In any case, your exact point has already been made in a comment. Comments are a privilege requiring 50 reputation points. You can earn these points fairly easily by posting good answers (each upvote earns you 10 pts) or questions (upvotes earn 5 pts). See How to Answer for further guidance, and take the EL&U Tour. :-)
    – Chappo
    5 hours ago






  • 3




    This does not provide an answer to the question. Once you have sufficient reputation you will be able to comment on any post; instead, provide answers that don't require clarification from the asker. - From Review
    – Chappo
    5 hours ago


















2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
72
down vote













Quite the reverse. It's an example of a 'minced oath', where a similar-sounding word is substituted for the name of God in an expletive so as to avoid blasphemy. In 19th-century fiction, if a 'bad' character swore it would frequently be written as 'By G-d' or 'D-n you', as swearing was considered so offensive in polite society. Nowadays, I've noticed that some people use religious oaths meaninglessly without caring that they are offensive to believers.






share|improve this answer

















  • 18




    I've noticed that some people use religious oaths meaninglessly without caring that they are offensive to believers Many simply don't know that what they're saying causes offence, for them it's simply part of the patios they grew up speaking and would be bemused if told that their mode of expression is offensive to some.
    – Binary Worrier
    11 hours ago






  • 6




    There's a sea captain in the operetta HMS Pinafore (1878) who claims as a point of pride that he "never uses a big, big D". Of course, he does say "damn" towards the end, and everyone is shocked.
    – Michael Seifert
    11 hours ago






  • 7




    "without caring that they are offensive to believers" They might not be offensive to believers any more though.
    – thosphor
    10 hours ago






  • 4




    "Look, I don't think it ought to be blasphemy, just saying 'Jehova'."
    – MichaelK
    9 hours ago






  • 2




    As a person who was raised Catholic, I can attest that this phrase comes from a place of respect for Christianity. One of the ten commandments is 'Do not take the Lord's name in vain', and stating "Oh my God!" would break that rule. Hence, we have such phrases as "Oh my Gosh", "Jiminy Christmas" and "Geeze Louise". Another early example is "Gazzooks!" which was originally "God's hooks" (a phrase that was hot in the middle ages).
    – Megan Sullivan
    7 hours ago















up vote
72
down vote













Quite the reverse. It's an example of a 'minced oath', where a similar-sounding word is substituted for the name of God in an expletive so as to avoid blasphemy. In 19th-century fiction, if a 'bad' character swore it would frequently be written as 'By G-d' or 'D-n you', as swearing was considered so offensive in polite society. Nowadays, I've noticed that some people use religious oaths meaninglessly without caring that they are offensive to believers.






share|improve this answer

















  • 18




    I've noticed that some people use religious oaths meaninglessly without caring that they are offensive to believers Many simply don't know that what they're saying causes offence, for them it's simply part of the patios they grew up speaking and would be bemused if told that their mode of expression is offensive to some.
    – Binary Worrier
    11 hours ago






  • 6




    There's a sea captain in the operetta HMS Pinafore (1878) who claims as a point of pride that he "never uses a big, big D". Of course, he does say "damn" towards the end, and everyone is shocked.
    – Michael Seifert
    11 hours ago






  • 7




    "without caring that they are offensive to believers" They might not be offensive to believers any more though.
    – thosphor
    10 hours ago






  • 4




    "Look, I don't think it ought to be blasphemy, just saying 'Jehova'."
    – MichaelK
    9 hours ago






  • 2




    As a person who was raised Catholic, I can attest that this phrase comes from a place of respect for Christianity. One of the ten commandments is 'Do not take the Lord's name in vain', and stating "Oh my God!" would break that rule. Hence, we have such phrases as "Oh my Gosh", "Jiminy Christmas" and "Geeze Louise". Another early example is "Gazzooks!" which was originally "God's hooks" (a phrase that was hot in the middle ages).
    – Megan Sullivan
    7 hours ago













up vote
72
down vote










up vote
72
down vote









Quite the reverse. It's an example of a 'minced oath', where a similar-sounding word is substituted for the name of God in an expletive so as to avoid blasphemy. In 19th-century fiction, if a 'bad' character swore it would frequently be written as 'By G-d' or 'D-n you', as swearing was considered so offensive in polite society. Nowadays, I've noticed that some people use religious oaths meaninglessly without caring that they are offensive to believers.






share|improve this answer












Quite the reverse. It's an example of a 'minced oath', where a similar-sounding word is substituted for the name of God in an expletive so as to avoid blasphemy. In 19th-century fiction, if a 'bad' character swore it would frequently be written as 'By G-d' or 'D-n you', as swearing was considered so offensive in polite society. Nowadays, I've noticed that some people use religious oaths meaninglessly without caring that they are offensive to believers.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 17 hours ago









Kate Bunting

5,33421414




5,33421414








  • 18




    I've noticed that some people use religious oaths meaninglessly without caring that they are offensive to believers Many simply don't know that what they're saying causes offence, for them it's simply part of the patios they grew up speaking and would be bemused if told that their mode of expression is offensive to some.
    – Binary Worrier
    11 hours ago






  • 6




    There's a sea captain in the operetta HMS Pinafore (1878) who claims as a point of pride that he "never uses a big, big D". Of course, he does say "damn" towards the end, and everyone is shocked.
    – Michael Seifert
    11 hours ago






  • 7




    "without caring that they are offensive to believers" They might not be offensive to believers any more though.
    – thosphor
    10 hours ago






  • 4




    "Look, I don't think it ought to be blasphemy, just saying 'Jehova'."
    – MichaelK
    9 hours ago






  • 2




    As a person who was raised Catholic, I can attest that this phrase comes from a place of respect for Christianity. One of the ten commandments is 'Do not take the Lord's name in vain', and stating "Oh my God!" would break that rule. Hence, we have such phrases as "Oh my Gosh", "Jiminy Christmas" and "Geeze Louise". Another early example is "Gazzooks!" which was originally "God's hooks" (a phrase that was hot in the middle ages).
    – Megan Sullivan
    7 hours ago














  • 18




    I've noticed that some people use religious oaths meaninglessly without caring that they are offensive to believers Many simply don't know that what they're saying causes offence, for them it's simply part of the patios they grew up speaking and would be bemused if told that their mode of expression is offensive to some.
    – Binary Worrier
    11 hours ago






  • 6




    There's a sea captain in the operetta HMS Pinafore (1878) who claims as a point of pride that he "never uses a big, big D". Of course, he does say "damn" towards the end, and everyone is shocked.
    – Michael Seifert
    11 hours ago






  • 7




    "without caring that they are offensive to believers" They might not be offensive to believers any more though.
    – thosphor
    10 hours ago






  • 4




    "Look, I don't think it ought to be blasphemy, just saying 'Jehova'."
    – MichaelK
    9 hours ago






  • 2




    As a person who was raised Catholic, I can attest that this phrase comes from a place of respect for Christianity. One of the ten commandments is 'Do not take the Lord's name in vain', and stating "Oh my God!" would break that rule. Hence, we have such phrases as "Oh my Gosh", "Jiminy Christmas" and "Geeze Louise". Another early example is "Gazzooks!" which was originally "God's hooks" (a phrase that was hot in the middle ages).
    – Megan Sullivan
    7 hours ago








18




18




I've noticed that some people use religious oaths meaninglessly without caring that they are offensive to believers Many simply don't know that what they're saying causes offence, for them it's simply part of the patios they grew up speaking and would be bemused if told that their mode of expression is offensive to some.
– Binary Worrier
11 hours ago




I've noticed that some people use religious oaths meaninglessly without caring that they are offensive to believers Many simply don't know that what they're saying causes offence, for them it's simply part of the patios they grew up speaking and would be bemused if told that their mode of expression is offensive to some.
– Binary Worrier
11 hours ago




6




6




There's a sea captain in the operetta HMS Pinafore (1878) who claims as a point of pride that he "never uses a big, big D". Of course, he does say "damn" towards the end, and everyone is shocked.
– Michael Seifert
11 hours ago




There's a sea captain in the operetta HMS Pinafore (1878) who claims as a point of pride that he "never uses a big, big D". Of course, he does say "damn" towards the end, and everyone is shocked.
– Michael Seifert
11 hours ago




7




7




"without caring that they are offensive to believers" They might not be offensive to believers any more though.
– thosphor
10 hours ago




"without caring that they are offensive to believers" They might not be offensive to believers any more though.
– thosphor
10 hours ago




4




4




"Look, I don't think it ought to be blasphemy, just saying 'Jehova'."
– MichaelK
9 hours ago




"Look, I don't think it ought to be blasphemy, just saying 'Jehova'."
– MichaelK
9 hours ago




2




2




As a person who was raised Catholic, I can attest that this phrase comes from a place of respect for Christianity. One of the ten commandments is 'Do not take the Lord's name in vain', and stating "Oh my God!" would break that rule. Hence, we have such phrases as "Oh my Gosh", "Jiminy Christmas" and "Geeze Louise". Another early example is "Gazzooks!" which was originally "God's hooks" (a phrase that was hot in the middle ages).
– Megan Sullivan
7 hours ago




As a person who was raised Catholic, I can attest that this phrase comes from a place of respect for Christianity. One of the ten commandments is 'Do not take the Lord's name in vain', and stating "Oh my God!" would break that rule. Hence, we have such phrases as "Oh my Gosh", "Jiminy Christmas" and "Geeze Louise". Another early example is "Gazzooks!" which was originally "God's hooks" (a phrase that was hot in the middle ages).
– Megan Sullivan
7 hours ago












up vote
-5
down vote













The expression ''Oh my God'' is actually offensive because it uses the Lord's name in vain which the Bible prohibits. I am a Christian myself, and the Christians I know wouldn't dare say this expression ever. ''Oh Lord'' is on the edge too.






share|improve this answer








New contributor




DebbieCakes122 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.














  • 3




    This is confusing as god's name isn't god. His proper name is Yahweh. The original Hebrew is pretty specific about this.
    – Skek Tek
    5 hours ago








  • 4




    @SkekTek Actually, the Hebrew, original or otherwise, isn't specific about the pronunciation at all. Even more confusing, perhaps.
    – tmgr
    5 hours ago






  • 4




    Debbie, this doesn't answer the question, which is not about "Oh my god", it's about "Oh my gosh" and whether that expression is used as a rejection of the belief in god. In any case, your exact point has already been made in a comment. Comments are a privilege requiring 50 reputation points. You can earn these points fairly easily by posting good answers (each upvote earns you 10 pts) or questions (upvotes earn 5 pts). See How to Answer for further guidance, and take the EL&U Tour. :-)
    – Chappo
    5 hours ago






  • 3




    This does not provide an answer to the question. Once you have sufficient reputation you will be able to comment on any post; instead, provide answers that don't require clarification from the asker. - From Review
    – Chappo
    5 hours ago















up vote
-5
down vote













The expression ''Oh my God'' is actually offensive because it uses the Lord's name in vain which the Bible prohibits. I am a Christian myself, and the Christians I know wouldn't dare say this expression ever. ''Oh Lord'' is on the edge too.






share|improve this answer








New contributor




DebbieCakes122 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.














  • 3




    This is confusing as god's name isn't god. His proper name is Yahweh. The original Hebrew is pretty specific about this.
    – Skek Tek
    5 hours ago








  • 4




    @SkekTek Actually, the Hebrew, original or otherwise, isn't specific about the pronunciation at all. Even more confusing, perhaps.
    – tmgr
    5 hours ago






  • 4




    Debbie, this doesn't answer the question, which is not about "Oh my god", it's about "Oh my gosh" and whether that expression is used as a rejection of the belief in god. In any case, your exact point has already been made in a comment. Comments are a privilege requiring 50 reputation points. You can earn these points fairly easily by posting good answers (each upvote earns you 10 pts) or questions (upvotes earn 5 pts). See How to Answer for further guidance, and take the EL&U Tour. :-)
    – Chappo
    5 hours ago






  • 3




    This does not provide an answer to the question. Once you have sufficient reputation you will be able to comment on any post; instead, provide answers that don't require clarification from the asker. - From Review
    – Chappo
    5 hours ago













up vote
-5
down vote










up vote
-5
down vote









The expression ''Oh my God'' is actually offensive because it uses the Lord's name in vain which the Bible prohibits. I am a Christian myself, and the Christians I know wouldn't dare say this expression ever. ''Oh Lord'' is on the edge too.






share|improve this answer








New contributor




DebbieCakes122 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









The expression ''Oh my God'' is actually offensive because it uses the Lord's name in vain which the Bible prohibits. I am a Christian myself, and the Christians I know wouldn't dare say this expression ever. ''Oh Lord'' is on the edge too.







share|improve this answer








New contributor




DebbieCakes122 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer






New contributor




DebbieCakes122 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









answered 6 hours ago









DebbieCakes122

9




9




New contributor




DebbieCakes122 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





DebbieCakes122 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






DebbieCakes122 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








  • 3




    This is confusing as god's name isn't god. His proper name is Yahweh. The original Hebrew is pretty specific about this.
    – Skek Tek
    5 hours ago








  • 4




    @SkekTek Actually, the Hebrew, original or otherwise, isn't specific about the pronunciation at all. Even more confusing, perhaps.
    – tmgr
    5 hours ago






  • 4




    Debbie, this doesn't answer the question, which is not about "Oh my god", it's about "Oh my gosh" and whether that expression is used as a rejection of the belief in god. In any case, your exact point has already been made in a comment. Comments are a privilege requiring 50 reputation points. You can earn these points fairly easily by posting good answers (each upvote earns you 10 pts) or questions (upvotes earn 5 pts). See How to Answer for further guidance, and take the EL&U Tour. :-)
    – Chappo
    5 hours ago






  • 3




    This does not provide an answer to the question. Once you have sufficient reputation you will be able to comment on any post; instead, provide answers that don't require clarification from the asker. - From Review
    – Chappo
    5 hours ago














  • 3




    This is confusing as god's name isn't god. His proper name is Yahweh. The original Hebrew is pretty specific about this.
    – Skek Tek
    5 hours ago








  • 4




    @SkekTek Actually, the Hebrew, original or otherwise, isn't specific about the pronunciation at all. Even more confusing, perhaps.
    – tmgr
    5 hours ago






  • 4




    Debbie, this doesn't answer the question, which is not about "Oh my god", it's about "Oh my gosh" and whether that expression is used as a rejection of the belief in god. In any case, your exact point has already been made in a comment. Comments are a privilege requiring 50 reputation points. You can earn these points fairly easily by posting good answers (each upvote earns you 10 pts) or questions (upvotes earn 5 pts). See How to Answer for further guidance, and take the EL&U Tour. :-)
    – Chappo
    5 hours ago






  • 3




    This does not provide an answer to the question. Once you have sufficient reputation you will be able to comment on any post; instead, provide answers that don't require clarification from the asker. - From Review
    – Chappo
    5 hours ago








3




3




This is confusing as god's name isn't god. His proper name is Yahweh. The original Hebrew is pretty specific about this.
– Skek Tek
5 hours ago






This is confusing as god's name isn't god. His proper name is Yahweh. The original Hebrew is pretty specific about this.
– Skek Tek
5 hours ago






4




4




@SkekTek Actually, the Hebrew, original or otherwise, isn't specific about the pronunciation at all. Even more confusing, perhaps.
– tmgr
5 hours ago




@SkekTek Actually, the Hebrew, original or otherwise, isn't specific about the pronunciation at all. Even more confusing, perhaps.
– tmgr
5 hours ago




4




4




Debbie, this doesn't answer the question, which is not about "Oh my god", it's about "Oh my gosh" and whether that expression is used as a rejection of the belief in god. In any case, your exact point has already been made in a comment. Comments are a privilege requiring 50 reputation points. You can earn these points fairly easily by posting good answers (each upvote earns you 10 pts) or questions (upvotes earn 5 pts). See How to Answer for further guidance, and take the EL&U Tour. :-)
– Chappo
5 hours ago




Debbie, this doesn't answer the question, which is not about "Oh my god", it's about "Oh my gosh" and whether that expression is used as a rejection of the belief in god. In any case, your exact point has already been made in a comment. Comments are a privilege requiring 50 reputation points. You can earn these points fairly easily by posting good answers (each upvote earns you 10 pts) or questions (upvotes earn 5 pts). See How to Answer for further guidance, and take the EL&U Tour. :-)
– Chappo
5 hours ago




3




3




This does not provide an answer to the question. Once you have sufficient reputation you will be able to comment on any post; instead, provide answers that don't require clarification from the asker. - From Review
– Chappo
5 hours ago




This does not provide an answer to the question. Once you have sufficient reputation you will be able to comment on any post; instead, provide answers that don't require clarification from the asker. - From Review
– Chappo
5 hours ago



Popular posts from this blog

Quarter-circle Tiles

build a pushdown automaton that recognizes the reverse language of a given pushdown automaton?

Mont Emei