Postgres Retrieve all id in a tree for given subnode











up vote
5
down vote

favorite
1












I have a non-binary tree of customer, and I need to obtain all the id in a tree for the given node.



The table is very simple just an join table with parent id and child id
This is a representation of the tree I stored in my db.



enter image description here



In this example if I search for node 17 I need in return 14-17
if I search for 11 I need in return 1-6-5-4-8-11-12-7-2-10-3



The order is not important I only need the id to avoid circularity when add children to a node.



I created this query.
The ancestor part works fine, I retrieve all parent nodes,
but for the descendants I have some trouble.
I'm only able to retrieve some part of the tree.
For example, with node 11 I retrieve 4-10-6-11-7-8, so all right part of the tree is missing



WITH RECURSIVE 
-- starting node(s)
starting (parent, child) AS
(
SELECT t.parent, t.child
FROM public.customerincustomer AS t
WHERE t.child = :node or t.parent = :node
)
,
ancestors (parent, child) AS
(
SELECT t.parent, t.child
FROM public.customerincustomer AS t
WHERE t.parent IN (SELECT parent FROM starting)
UNION ALL
SELECT t.parent, t.child
FROM public.customerincustomer AS t JOIN ancestors AS a ON t.child = a.parent
),
descendants (parent, child) AS
(
SELECT t.parent, t.child
FROM public.customerincustomer AS t
WHERE t.parent IN (SELECT parent FROM starting) or t.child in (select child from starting)
UNION ALL
SELECT t.parent, t.child
FROM public.customerincustomer AS t JOIN ancestors AS a ON t.parent = a.child
)

table ancestors
union all
table descendants


UPDATE



I see that many example include in the tree table also the root in form (root_id, null)
in my case i don't have this record.
For example taking the smallest tree 14->17, in my table i have only one record
parent, child
14 17










share|improve this question









New contributor




Luca Nitti is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




















  • Depending on your workload and use case you may also want to consider ltree
    – Evan Carroll
    13 hours ago

















up vote
5
down vote

favorite
1












I have a non-binary tree of customer, and I need to obtain all the id in a tree for the given node.



The table is very simple just an join table with parent id and child id
This is a representation of the tree I stored in my db.



enter image description here



In this example if I search for node 17 I need in return 14-17
if I search for 11 I need in return 1-6-5-4-8-11-12-7-2-10-3



The order is not important I only need the id to avoid circularity when add children to a node.



I created this query.
The ancestor part works fine, I retrieve all parent nodes,
but for the descendants I have some trouble.
I'm only able to retrieve some part of the tree.
For example, with node 11 I retrieve 4-10-6-11-7-8, so all right part of the tree is missing



WITH RECURSIVE 
-- starting node(s)
starting (parent, child) AS
(
SELECT t.parent, t.child
FROM public.customerincustomer AS t
WHERE t.child = :node or t.parent = :node
)
,
ancestors (parent, child) AS
(
SELECT t.parent, t.child
FROM public.customerincustomer AS t
WHERE t.parent IN (SELECT parent FROM starting)
UNION ALL
SELECT t.parent, t.child
FROM public.customerincustomer AS t JOIN ancestors AS a ON t.child = a.parent
),
descendants (parent, child) AS
(
SELECT t.parent, t.child
FROM public.customerincustomer AS t
WHERE t.parent IN (SELECT parent FROM starting) or t.child in (select child from starting)
UNION ALL
SELECT t.parent, t.child
FROM public.customerincustomer AS t JOIN ancestors AS a ON t.parent = a.child
)

table ancestors
union all
table descendants


UPDATE



I see that many example include in the tree table also the root in form (root_id, null)
in my case i don't have this record.
For example taking the smallest tree 14->17, in my table i have only one record
parent, child
14 17










share|improve this question









New contributor




Luca Nitti is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




















  • Depending on your workload and use case you may also want to consider ltree
    – Evan Carroll
    13 hours ago















up vote
5
down vote

favorite
1









up vote
5
down vote

favorite
1






1





I have a non-binary tree of customer, and I need to obtain all the id in a tree for the given node.



The table is very simple just an join table with parent id and child id
This is a representation of the tree I stored in my db.



enter image description here



In this example if I search for node 17 I need in return 14-17
if I search for 11 I need in return 1-6-5-4-8-11-12-7-2-10-3



The order is not important I only need the id to avoid circularity when add children to a node.



I created this query.
The ancestor part works fine, I retrieve all parent nodes,
but for the descendants I have some trouble.
I'm only able to retrieve some part of the tree.
For example, with node 11 I retrieve 4-10-6-11-7-8, so all right part of the tree is missing



WITH RECURSIVE 
-- starting node(s)
starting (parent, child) AS
(
SELECT t.parent, t.child
FROM public.customerincustomer AS t
WHERE t.child = :node or t.parent = :node
)
,
ancestors (parent, child) AS
(
SELECT t.parent, t.child
FROM public.customerincustomer AS t
WHERE t.parent IN (SELECT parent FROM starting)
UNION ALL
SELECT t.parent, t.child
FROM public.customerincustomer AS t JOIN ancestors AS a ON t.child = a.parent
),
descendants (parent, child) AS
(
SELECT t.parent, t.child
FROM public.customerincustomer AS t
WHERE t.parent IN (SELECT parent FROM starting) or t.child in (select child from starting)
UNION ALL
SELECT t.parent, t.child
FROM public.customerincustomer AS t JOIN ancestors AS a ON t.parent = a.child
)

table ancestors
union all
table descendants


UPDATE



I see that many example include in the tree table also the root in form (root_id, null)
in my case i don't have this record.
For example taking the smallest tree 14->17, in my table i have only one record
parent, child
14 17










share|improve this question









New contributor




Luca Nitti is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











I have a non-binary tree of customer, and I need to obtain all the id in a tree for the given node.



The table is very simple just an join table with parent id and child id
This is a representation of the tree I stored in my db.



enter image description here



In this example if I search for node 17 I need in return 14-17
if I search for 11 I need in return 1-6-5-4-8-11-12-7-2-10-3



The order is not important I only need the id to avoid circularity when add children to a node.



I created this query.
The ancestor part works fine, I retrieve all parent nodes,
but for the descendants I have some trouble.
I'm only able to retrieve some part of the tree.
For example, with node 11 I retrieve 4-10-6-11-7-8, so all right part of the tree is missing



WITH RECURSIVE 
-- starting node(s)
starting (parent, child) AS
(
SELECT t.parent, t.child
FROM public.customerincustomer AS t
WHERE t.child = :node or t.parent = :node
)
,
ancestors (parent, child) AS
(
SELECT t.parent, t.child
FROM public.customerincustomer AS t
WHERE t.parent IN (SELECT parent FROM starting)
UNION ALL
SELECT t.parent, t.child
FROM public.customerincustomer AS t JOIN ancestors AS a ON t.child = a.parent
),
descendants (parent, child) AS
(
SELECT t.parent, t.child
FROM public.customerincustomer AS t
WHERE t.parent IN (SELECT parent FROM starting) or t.child in (select child from starting)
UNION ALL
SELECT t.parent, t.child
FROM public.customerincustomer AS t JOIN ancestors AS a ON t.parent = a.child
)

table ancestors
union all
table descendants


UPDATE



I see that many example include in the tree table also the root in form (root_id, null)
in my case i don't have this record.
For example taking the smallest tree 14->17, in my table i have only one record
parent, child
14 17







postgresql recursive tree






share|improve this question









New contributor




Luca Nitti is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




Luca Nitti is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 14 hours ago





















New contributor




Luca Nitti is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 16 hours ago









Luca Nitti

283




283




New contributor




Luca Nitti is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Luca Nitti is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Luca Nitti is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












  • Depending on your workload and use case you may also want to consider ltree
    – Evan Carroll
    13 hours ago




















  • Depending on your workload and use case you may also want to consider ltree
    – Evan Carroll
    13 hours ago


















Depending on your workload and use case you may also want to consider ltree
– Evan Carroll
13 hours ago






Depending on your workload and use case you may also want to consider ltree
– Evan Carroll
13 hours ago












2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
4
down vote



accepted










A very primitive implementation:



It basically divides the problem into two subproblems:




  • First find all the ancestors of the node in question (including the node itself). If the node has no parents, then this would be just itself.

  • Then find the descendants of all those ancestors (including themselves). We may have several nodes in the ancestors result set, we may get duplicates here, so we use UNION (and not UNION ALL) to remove them.

  • Note that the query will work even if the input node is a root with has no children.

  • It will also work if the data set is not a forest of trees but an arbitrary directed graph (where nodes can have more than one parent).


The query:



WITH RECURSIVE 
ancestors (parent) AS
(
SELECT :node -- start with the given node
UNION ALL
SELECT t.parent -- and find all its ancestors
FROM public.customerincustomer AS t JOIN ancestors AS a ON t.child = a.parent
),
descendants (customer) AS
(
SELECT parent AS customer -- now start with all the ancestors
FROM ancestors
UNION
SELECT t.child -- and find all their descendants
FROM public.customerincustomer AS t JOIN descendants AS d ON t.parent = d.customer
)
SELECT customer
FROM descendants ;





share|improve this answer























  • Thanks! this is exactly what i need
    – Luca Nitti
    13 hours ago


















up vote
3
down vote













This function returns the parent level of node_id:



There is a 'level' row due there isn't a row (id, null) for parent row.



CREATE FUNCTION get_parent(node_id int)
RETURNS integer AS
$$
WITH RECURSIVE get_parent AS
(
SELECT
t1.id,
t1.parent_id,
t1.name,
0 AS level
FROM
tree t1
WHERE
t1.id = node_id
UNION ALL
SELECT
t2.id,
t2.parent_id,
t2.name,
level+1
FROM
tree t2
INNER JOIN
get_parent ON get_parent.parent_id = t2.id
)
SELECT
id
FROM
get_parent
ORDER BY
level DESC
LIMIT 1 ;
$$
LANGUAGE SQL;



select get_parent(7);




| get_parent |
| ---------: |
| 6 |


Now, next query returns the whole tree structure based on a parent node.





WITH RECURSIVE childs AS
(
SELECT
t1.id,
t1.parent_id,
t1.name
FROM
tree t1
WHERE
t1.id = get_parent(7)
UNION ALL
SELECT
t2.id,
t2.parent_id,
t2.name
FROM
tree t2
INNER JOIN
childs ON childs.id = t2.parent_id
)
SELECT
id,
parent_id,
name
FROM
childs;



id | parent_id | name
-: | --------: | :------
6 | 1 | Node 6
4 | 6 | Node 4
8 | 6 | Node 8
11 | 6 | Node 11
7 | 11 | Node 7
10 | 7 | Node 10


db<>fiddle here






share|improve this answer























  • as i said, i don't have problem with ancestors. I need the whole tree.
    – Luca Nitti
    16 hours ago













Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "182"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});






Luca Nitti is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdba.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f224871%2fpostgres-retrieve-all-id-in-a-tree-for-given-subnode%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
4
down vote



accepted










A very primitive implementation:



It basically divides the problem into two subproblems:




  • First find all the ancestors of the node in question (including the node itself). If the node has no parents, then this would be just itself.

  • Then find the descendants of all those ancestors (including themselves). We may have several nodes in the ancestors result set, we may get duplicates here, so we use UNION (and not UNION ALL) to remove them.

  • Note that the query will work even if the input node is a root with has no children.

  • It will also work if the data set is not a forest of trees but an arbitrary directed graph (where nodes can have more than one parent).


The query:



WITH RECURSIVE 
ancestors (parent) AS
(
SELECT :node -- start with the given node
UNION ALL
SELECT t.parent -- and find all its ancestors
FROM public.customerincustomer AS t JOIN ancestors AS a ON t.child = a.parent
),
descendants (customer) AS
(
SELECT parent AS customer -- now start with all the ancestors
FROM ancestors
UNION
SELECT t.child -- and find all their descendants
FROM public.customerincustomer AS t JOIN descendants AS d ON t.parent = d.customer
)
SELECT customer
FROM descendants ;





share|improve this answer























  • Thanks! this is exactly what i need
    – Luca Nitti
    13 hours ago















up vote
4
down vote



accepted










A very primitive implementation:



It basically divides the problem into two subproblems:




  • First find all the ancestors of the node in question (including the node itself). If the node has no parents, then this would be just itself.

  • Then find the descendants of all those ancestors (including themselves). We may have several nodes in the ancestors result set, we may get duplicates here, so we use UNION (and not UNION ALL) to remove them.

  • Note that the query will work even if the input node is a root with has no children.

  • It will also work if the data set is not a forest of trees but an arbitrary directed graph (where nodes can have more than one parent).


The query:



WITH RECURSIVE 
ancestors (parent) AS
(
SELECT :node -- start with the given node
UNION ALL
SELECT t.parent -- and find all its ancestors
FROM public.customerincustomer AS t JOIN ancestors AS a ON t.child = a.parent
),
descendants (customer) AS
(
SELECT parent AS customer -- now start with all the ancestors
FROM ancestors
UNION
SELECT t.child -- and find all their descendants
FROM public.customerincustomer AS t JOIN descendants AS d ON t.parent = d.customer
)
SELECT customer
FROM descendants ;





share|improve this answer























  • Thanks! this is exactly what i need
    – Luca Nitti
    13 hours ago













up vote
4
down vote



accepted







up vote
4
down vote



accepted






A very primitive implementation:



It basically divides the problem into two subproblems:




  • First find all the ancestors of the node in question (including the node itself). If the node has no parents, then this would be just itself.

  • Then find the descendants of all those ancestors (including themselves). We may have several nodes in the ancestors result set, we may get duplicates here, so we use UNION (and not UNION ALL) to remove them.

  • Note that the query will work even if the input node is a root with has no children.

  • It will also work if the data set is not a forest of trees but an arbitrary directed graph (where nodes can have more than one parent).


The query:



WITH RECURSIVE 
ancestors (parent) AS
(
SELECT :node -- start with the given node
UNION ALL
SELECT t.parent -- and find all its ancestors
FROM public.customerincustomer AS t JOIN ancestors AS a ON t.child = a.parent
),
descendants (customer) AS
(
SELECT parent AS customer -- now start with all the ancestors
FROM ancestors
UNION
SELECT t.child -- and find all their descendants
FROM public.customerincustomer AS t JOIN descendants AS d ON t.parent = d.customer
)
SELECT customer
FROM descendants ;





share|improve this answer














A very primitive implementation:



It basically divides the problem into two subproblems:




  • First find all the ancestors of the node in question (including the node itself). If the node has no parents, then this would be just itself.

  • Then find the descendants of all those ancestors (including themselves). We may have several nodes in the ancestors result set, we may get duplicates here, so we use UNION (and not UNION ALL) to remove them.

  • Note that the query will work even if the input node is a root with has no children.

  • It will also work if the data set is not a forest of trees but an arbitrary directed graph (where nodes can have more than one parent).


The query:



WITH RECURSIVE 
ancestors (parent) AS
(
SELECT :node -- start with the given node
UNION ALL
SELECT t.parent -- and find all its ancestors
FROM public.customerincustomer AS t JOIN ancestors AS a ON t.child = a.parent
),
descendants (customer) AS
(
SELECT parent AS customer -- now start with all the ancestors
FROM ancestors
UNION
SELECT t.child -- and find all their descendants
FROM public.customerincustomer AS t JOIN descendants AS d ON t.parent = d.customer
)
SELECT customer
FROM descendants ;






share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 13 hours ago

























answered 13 hours ago









ypercubeᵀᴹ

73.7k11124203




73.7k11124203












  • Thanks! this is exactly what i need
    – Luca Nitti
    13 hours ago


















  • Thanks! this is exactly what i need
    – Luca Nitti
    13 hours ago
















Thanks! this is exactly what i need
– Luca Nitti
13 hours ago




Thanks! this is exactly what i need
– Luca Nitti
13 hours ago












up vote
3
down vote













This function returns the parent level of node_id:



There is a 'level' row due there isn't a row (id, null) for parent row.



CREATE FUNCTION get_parent(node_id int)
RETURNS integer AS
$$
WITH RECURSIVE get_parent AS
(
SELECT
t1.id,
t1.parent_id,
t1.name,
0 AS level
FROM
tree t1
WHERE
t1.id = node_id
UNION ALL
SELECT
t2.id,
t2.parent_id,
t2.name,
level+1
FROM
tree t2
INNER JOIN
get_parent ON get_parent.parent_id = t2.id
)
SELECT
id
FROM
get_parent
ORDER BY
level DESC
LIMIT 1 ;
$$
LANGUAGE SQL;



select get_parent(7);




| get_parent |
| ---------: |
| 6 |


Now, next query returns the whole tree structure based on a parent node.





WITH RECURSIVE childs AS
(
SELECT
t1.id,
t1.parent_id,
t1.name
FROM
tree t1
WHERE
t1.id = get_parent(7)
UNION ALL
SELECT
t2.id,
t2.parent_id,
t2.name
FROM
tree t2
INNER JOIN
childs ON childs.id = t2.parent_id
)
SELECT
id,
parent_id,
name
FROM
childs;



id | parent_id | name
-: | --------: | :------
6 | 1 | Node 6
4 | 6 | Node 4
8 | 6 | Node 8
11 | 6 | Node 11
7 | 11 | Node 7
10 | 7 | Node 10


db<>fiddle here






share|improve this answer























  • as i said, i don't have problem with ancestors. I need the whole tree.
    – Luca Nitti
    16 hours ago

















up vote
3
down vote













This function returns the parent level of node_id:



There is a 'level' row due there isn't a row (id, null) for parent row.



CREATE FUNCTION get_parent(node_id int)
RETURNS integer AS
$$
WITH RECURSIVE get_parent AS
(
SELECT
t1.id,
t1.parent_id,
t1.name,
0 AS level
FROM
tree t1
WHERE
t1.id = node_id
UNION ALL
SELECT
t2.id,
t2.parent_id,
t2.name,
level+1
FROM
tree t2
INNER JOIN
get_parent ON get_parent.parent_id = t2.id
)
SELECT
id
FROM
get_parent
ORDER BY
level DESC
LIMIT 1 ;
$$
LANGUAGE SQL;



select get_parent(7);




| get_parent |
| ---------: |
| 6 |


Now, next query returns the whole tree structure based on a parent node.





WITH RECURSIVE childs AS
(
SELECT
t1.id,
t1.parent_id,
t1.name
FROM
tree t1
WHERE
t1.id = get_parent(7)
UNION ALL
SELECT
t2.id,
t2.parent_id,
t2.name
FROM
tree t2
INNER JOIN
childs ON childs.id = t2.parent_id
)
SELECT
id,
parent_id,
name
FROM
childs;



id | parent_id | name
-: | --------: | :------
6 | 1 | Node 6
4 | 6 | Node 4
8 | 6 | Node 8
11 | 6 | Node 11
7 | 11 | Node 7
10 | 7 | Node 10


db<>fiddle here






share|improve this answer























  • as i said, i don't have problem with ancestors. I need the whole tree.
    – Luca Nitti
    16 hours ago















up vote
3
down vote










up vote
3
down vote









This function returns the parent level of node_id:



There is a 'level' row due there isn't a row (id, null) for parent row.



CREATE FUNCTION get_parent(node_id int)
RETURNS integer AS
$$
WITH RECURSIVE get_parent AS
(
SELECT
t1.id,
t1.parent_id,
t1.name,
0 AS level
FROM
tree t1
WHERE
t1.id = node_id
UNION ALL
SELECT
t2.id,
t2.parent_id,
t2.name,
level+1
FROM
tree t2
INNER JOIN
get_parent ON get_parent.parent_id = t2.id
)
SELECT
id
FROM
get_parent
ORDER BY
level DESC
LIMIT 1 ;
$$
LANGUAGE SQL;



select get_parent(7);




| get_parent |
| ---------: |
| 6 |


Now, next query returns the whole tree structure based on a parent node.





WITH RECURSIVE childs AS
(
SELECT
t1.id,
t1.parent_id,
t1.name
FROM
tree t1
WHERE
t1.id = get_parent(7)
UNION ALL
SELECT
t2.id,
t2.parent_id,
t2.name
FROM
tree t2
INNER JOIN
childs ON childs.id = t2.parent_id
)
SELECT
id,
parent_id,
name
FROM
childs;



id | parent_id | name
-: | --------: | :------
6 | 1 | Node 6
4 | 6 | Node 4
8 | 6 | Node 8
11 | 6 | Node 11
7 | 11 | Node 7
10 | 7 | Node 10


db<>fiddle here






share|improve this answer














This function returns the parent level of node_id:



There is a 'level' row due there isn't a row (id, null) for parent row.



CREATE FUNCTION get_parent(node_id int)
RETURNS integer AS
$$
WITH RECURSIVE get_parent AS
(
SELECT
t1.id,
t1.parent_id,
t1.name,
0 AS level
FROM
tree t1
WHERE
t1.id = node_id
UNION ALL
SELECT
t2.id,
t2.parent_id,
t2.name,
level+1
FROM
tree t2
INNER JOIN
get_parent ON get_parent.parent_id = t2.id
)
SELECT
id
FROM
get_parent
ORDER BY
level DESC
LIMIT 1 ;
$$
LANGUAGE SQL;



select get_parent(7);




| get_parent |
| ---------: |
| 6 |


Now, next query returns the whole tree structure based on a parent node.





WITH RECURSIVE childs AS
(
SELECT
t1.id,
t1.parent_id,
t1.name
FROM
tree t1
WHERE
t1.id = get_parent(7)
UNION ALL
SELECT
t2.id,
t2.parent_id,
t2.name
FROM
tree t2
INNER JOIN
childs ON childs.id = t2.parent_id
)
SELECT
id,
parent_id,
name
FROM
childs;



id | parent_id | name
-: | --------: | :------
6 | 1 | Node 6
4 | 6 | Node 4
8 | 6 | Node 8
11 | 6 | Node 11
7 | 11 | Node 7
10 | 7 | Node 10


db<>fiddle here







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 11 hours ago

























answered 16 hours ago









McNets

14.2k41754




14.2k41754












  • as i said, i don't have problem with ancestors. I need the whole tree.
    – Luca Nitti
    16 hours ago




















  • as i said, i don't have problem with ancestors. I need the whole tree.
    – Luca Nitti
    16 hours ago


















as i said, i don't have problem with ancestors. I need the whole tree.
– Luca Nitti
16 hours ago






as i said, i don't have problem with ancestors. I need the whole tree.
– Luca Nitti
16 hours ago












Luca Nitti is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










draft saved

draft discarded


















Luca Nitti is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













Luca Nitti is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












Luca Nitti is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















Thanks for contributing an answer to Database Administrators Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdba.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f224871%2fpostgres-retrieve-all-id-in-a-tree-for-given-subnode%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Ellipse (mathématiques)

Quarter-circle Tiles

Mont Emei