Kronecker Delta Expressions
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
I am trying to understand the Kronecker Delta and want to clarify. Considering the definition of the Kronecker Delta and assuming $i=j=k$ for the following situations:
I know that $delta _j^i delta _i^j $ is equal to $N$ where $N$ is the dimension of space. Would this mean that $delta _j^i delta _k^j delta _i^k $ would also be equal to $N$?
Similarly, since $delta _i^i delta _j^j $ is equal to $N^2$, would $delta _i^i delta _j^j delta _k^k $ be equal to $N^3$ ?
Last, is $delta _i^j delta _j^k $ just equal to $delta _i^k = 1 $ ?
vectors tensors kronecker-symbol kronecker-delta
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
I am trying to understand the Kronecker Delta and want to clarify. Considering the definition of the Kronecker Delta and assuming $i=j=k$ for the following situations:
I know that $delta _j^i delta _i^j $ is equal to $N$ where $N$ is the dimension of space. Would this mean that $delta _j^i delta _k^j delta _i^k $ would also be equal to $N$?
Similarly, since $delta _i^i delta _j^j $ is equal to $N^2$, would $delta _i^i delta _j^j delta _k^k $ be equal to $N^3$ ?
Last, is $delta _i^j delta _j^k $ just equal to $delta _i^k = 1 $ ?
vectors tensors kronecker-symbol kronecker-delta
@AlvinJin This should be an answer not a comment
– Eddy
Sep 25 at 20:51
If $i=k$, wouldn't the $delta_i^k$ be equal to 1, by definition though?
– Cave Johnson
Sep 25 at 20:53
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
I am trying to understand the Kronecker Delta and want to clarify. Considering the definition of the Kronecker Delta and assuming $i=j=k$ for the following situations:
I know that $delta _j^i delta _i^j $ is equal to $N$ where $N$ is the dimension of space. Would this mean that $delta _j^i delta _k^j delta _i^k $ would also be equal to $N$?
Similarly, since $delta _i^i delta _j^j $ is equal to $N^2$, would $delta _i^i delta _j^j delta _k^k $ be equal to $N^3$ ?
Last, is $delta _i^j delta _j^k $ just equal to $delta _i^k = 1 $ ?
vectors tensors kronecker-symbol kronecker-delta
I am trying to understand the Kronecker Delta and want to clarify. Considering the definition of the Kronecker Delta and assuming $i=j=k$ for the following situations:
I know that $delta _j^i delta _i^j $ is equal to $N$ where $N$ is the dimension of space. Would this mean that $delta _j^i delta _k^j delta _i^k $ would also be equal to $N$?
Similarly, since $delta _i^i delta _j^j $ is equal to $N^2$, would $delta _i^i delta _j^j delta _k^k $ be equal to $N^3$ ?
Last, is $delta _i^j delta _j^k $ just equal to $delta _i^k = 1 $ ?
vectors tensors kronecker-symbol kronecker-delta
vectors tensors kronecker-symbol kronecker-delta
edited Sep 25 at 20:41
asked Sep 25 at 20:10
Cave Johnson
206
206
@AlvinJin This should be an answer not a comment
– Eddy
Sep 25 at 20:51
If $i=k$, wouldn't the $delta_i^k$ be equal to 1, by definition though?
– Cave Johnson
Sep 25 at 20:53
add a comment |
@AlvinJin This should be an answer not a comment
– Eddy
Sep 25 at 20:51
If $i=k$, wouldn't the $delta_i^k$ be equal to 1, by definition though?
– Cave Johnson
Sep 25 at 20:53
@AlvinJin This should be an answer not a comment
– Eddy
Sep 25 at 20:51
@AlvinJin This should be an answer not a comment
– Eddy
Sep 25 at 20:51
If $i=k$, wouldn't the $delta_i^k$ be equal to 1, by definition though?
– Cave Johnson
Sep 25 at 20:53
If $i=k$, wouldn't the $delta_i^k$ be equal to 1, by definition though?
– Cave Johnson
Sep 25 at 20:53
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
It looks to me like you're inherently using the Einstein summation convention, familiar in general relativity. For the purposes of this question, this means that any indices seen twice are summed over.
When you say $delta^i_j delta^j_i = N$, for example, this implicitly means $displaystyle sum_{i=1}^N displaystyle sum_{j=1}^N delta^i_j delta^j_i = N$ which is indeed true since the sum is non-vanishing whenever $i=j$ and this happens $N$ times.
Similarly, $delta^i_j delta^j_k delta^k_i = displaystyle sum_{i=1}^N displaystyle sum_{j=1}^N displaystyle sum_{k=1}^N delta^i_j delta^j_k delta^k_i = N$, as you surmise.
Also $delta^i_i delta^j_j delta^k_k = displaystyle sum_{i=1}^N displaystyle sum_{j=1}^N displaystyle sum_{k=1}^N delta^i_i delta^j_j delta^k_k = N^3$, as you suspected.
Finally, $delta^j_i delta^k_j = delta^k_i$ but this is not a scalar quantity ($neq 1$). Instead it has a separate value for each index $i$ and $k$. You can think of it as being represented by a matrix whose $(i,k)$th entry is $1$ if $i=k$ and $0$ otherwise (identity matrix in $N$ dimensions).
This is a bit of a simplification of the whole picture but the essence of the machinery is here.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2930727%2fkronecker-delta-expressions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
It looks to me like you're inherently using the Einstein summation convention, familiar in general relativity. For the purposes of this question, this means that any indices seen twice are summed over.
When you say $delta^i_j delta^j_i = N$, for example, this implicitly means $displaystyle sum_{i=1}^N displaystyle sum_{j=1}^N delta^i_j delta^j_i = N$ which is indeed true since the sum is non-vanishing whenever $i=j$ and this happens $N$ times.
Similarly, $delta^i_j delta^j_k delta^k_i = displaystyle sum_{i=1}^N displaystyle sum_{j=1}^N displaystyle sum_{k=1}^N delta^i_j delta^j_k delta^k_i = N$, as you surmise.
Also $delta^i_i delta^j_j delta^k_k = displaystyle sum_{i=1}^N displaystyle sum_{j=1}^N displaystyle sum_{k=1}^N delta^i_i delta^j_j delta^k_k = N^3$, as you suspected.
Finally, $delta^j_i delta^k_j = delta^k_i$ but this is not a scalar quantity ($neq 1$). Instead it has a separate value for each index $i$ and $k$. You can think of it as being represented by a matrix whose $(i,k)$th entry is $1$ if $i=k$ and $0$ otherwise (identity matrix in $N$ dimensions).
This is a bit of a simplification of the whole picture but the essence of the machinery is here.
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
It looks to me like you're inherently using the Einstein summation convention, familiar in general relativity. For the purposes of this question, this means that any indices seen twice are summed over.
When you say $delta^i_j delta^j_i = N$, for example, this implicitly means $displaystyle sum_{i=1}^N displaystyle sum_{j=1}^N delta^i_j delta^j_i = N$ which is indeed true since the sum is non-vanishing whenever $i=j$ and this happens $N$ times.
Similarly, $delta^i_j delta^j_k delta^k_i = displaystyle sum_{i=1}^N displaystyle sum_{j=1}^N displaystyle sum_{k=1}^N delta^i_j delta^j_k delta^k_i = N$, as you surmise.
Also $delta^i_i delta^j_j delta^k_k = displaystyle sum_{i=1}^N displaystyle sum_{j=1}^N displaystyle sum_{k=1}^N delta^i_i delta^j_j delta^k_k = N^3$, as you suspected.
Finally, $delta^j_i delta^k_j = delta^k_i$ but this is not a scalar quantity ($neq 1$). Instead it has a separate value for each index $i$ and $k$. You can think of it as being represented by a matrix whose $(i,k)$th entry is $1$ if $i=k$ and $0$ otherwise (identity matrix in $N$ dimensions).
This is a bit of a simplification of the whole picture but the essence of the machinery is here.
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
It looks to me like you're inherently using the Einstein summation convention, familiar in general relativity. For the purposes of this question, this means that any indices seen twice are summed over.
When you say $delta^i_j delta^j_i = N$, for example, this implicitly means $displaystyle sum_{i=1}^N displaystyle sum_{j=1}^N delta^i_j delta^j_i = N$ which is indeed true since the sum is non-vanishing whenever $i=j$ and this happens $N$ times.
Similarly, $delta^i_j delta^j_k delta^k_i = displaystyle sum_{i=1}^N displaystyle sum_{j=1}^N displaystyle sum_{k=1}^N delta^i_j delta^j_k delta^k_i = N$, as you surmise.
Also $delta^i_i delta^j_j delta^k_k = displaystyle sum_{i=1}^N displaystyle sum_{j=1}^N displaystyle sum_{k=1}^N delta^i_i delta^j_j delta^k_k = N^3$, as you suspected.
Finally, $delta^j_i delta^k_j = delta^k_i$ but this is not a scalar quantity ($neq 1$). Instead it has a separate value for each index $i$ and $k$. You can think of it as being represented by a matrix whose $(i,k)$th entry is $1$ if $i=k$ and $0$ otherwise (identity matrix in $N$ dimensions).
This is a bit of a simplification of the whole picture but the essence of the machinery is here.
It looks to me like you're inherently using the Einstein summation convention, familiar in general relativity. For the purposes of this question, this means that any indices seen twice are summed over.
When you say $delta^i_j delta^j_i = N$, for example, this implicitly means $displaystyle sum_{i=1}^N displaystyle sum_{j=1}^N delta^i_j delta^j_i = N$ which is indeed true since the sum is non-vanishing whenever $i=j$ and this happens $N$ times.
Similarly, $delta^i_j delta^j_k delta^k_i = displaystyle sum_{i=1}^N displaystyle sum_{j=1}^N displaystyle sum_{k=1}^N delta^i_j delta^j_k delta^k_i = N$, as you surmise.
Also $delta^i_i delta^j_j delta^k_k = displaystyle sum_{i=1}^N displaystyle sum_{j=1}^N displaystyle sum_{k=1}^N delta^i_i delta^j_j delta^k_k = N^3$, as you suspected.
Finally, $delta^j_i delta^k_j = delta^k_i$ but this is not a scalar quantity ($neq 1$). Instead it has a separate value for each index $i$ and $k$. You can think of it as being represented by a matrix whose $(i,k)$th entry is $1$ if $i=k$ and $0$ otherwise (identity matrix in $N$ dimensions).
This is a bit of a simplification of the whole picture but the essence of the machinery is here.
answered Sep 26 at 23:36
hexomino
1,07638
1,07638
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2930727%2fkronecker-delta-expressions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
@AlvinJin This should be an answer not a comment
– Eddy
Sep 25 at 20:51
If $i=k$, wouldn't the $delta_i^k$ be equal to 1, by definition though?
– Cave Johnson
Sep 25 at 20:53