The existence of a matrix?











up vote
2
down vote

favorite












Suppose that the matrix $Ain{mathbb{R}}^{ntimes r}$, $textrm{rank}(A)=r$, and $I_{n}$ is the identity matrix. Is there a matrix $Bin{mathbb{R}}^{rtimes n}$, such that
$$AB=I_{n}?$$



What is the requirement for the matrix $A$? Thank you!










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 1




    You mean $rank(A)$?
    – Patricio
    yesterday






  • 2




    @Yasmin, $A$ needs not be square, I think
    – Patricio
    yesterday








  • 1




    @Yasmin, that's my point, $A$ is $n times r$ and $n$ and $r$ need not be equal to each other.
    – Patricio
    yesterday






  • 2




    @Yasmin In case $n=r$, the question states that $rank(A)=n$, so it is automatically invertible. I guess the meat of the question is what happens if $n neq r$.
    – lisyarus
    yesterday















up vote
2
down vote

favorite












Suppose that the matrix $Ain{mathbb{R}}^{ntimes r}$, $textrm{rank}(A)=r$, and $I_{n}$ is the identity matrix. Is there a matrix $Bin{mathbb{R}}^{rtimes n}$, such that
$$AB=I_{n}?$$



What is the requirement for the matrix $A$? Thank you!










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 1




    You mean $rank(A)$?
    – Patricio
    yesterday






  • 2




    @Yasmin, $A$ needs not be square, I think
    – Patricio
    yesterday








  • 1




    @Yasmin, that's my point, $A$ is $n times r$ and $n$ and $r$ need not be equal to each other.
    – Patricio
    yesterday






  • 2




    @Yasmin In case $n=r$, the question states that $rank(A)=n$, so it is automatically invertible. I guess the meat of the question is what happens if $n neq r$.
    – lisyarus
    yesterday













up vote
2
down vote

favorite









up vote
2
down vote

favorite











Suppose that the matrix $Ain{mathbb{R}}^{ntimes r}$, $textrm{rank}(A)=r$, and $I_{n}$ is the identity matrix. Is there a matrix $Bin{mathbb{R}}^{rtimes n}$, such that
$$AB=I_{n}?$$



What is the requirement for the matrix $A$? Thank you!










share|cite|improve this question















Suppose that the matrix $Ain{mathbb{R}}^{ntimes r}$, $textrm{rank}(A)=r$, and $I_{n}$ is the identity matrix. Is there a matrix $Bin{mathbb{R}}^{rtimes n}$, such that
$$AB=I_{n}?$$



What is the requirement for the matrix $A$? Thank you!







linear-algebra matrices






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited yesterday









Alex Silva

2,70331332




2,70331332










asked yesterday









Wei Jiang

242




242








  • 1




    You mean $rank(A)$?
    – Patricio
    yesterday






  • 2




    @Yasmin, $A$ needs not be square, I think
    – Patricio
    yesterday








  • 1




    @Yasmin, that's my point, $A$ is $n times r$ and $n$ and $r$ need not be equal to each other.
    – Patricio
    yesterday






  • 2




    @Yasmin In case $n=r$, the question states that $rank(A)=n$, so it is automatically invertible. I guess the meat of the question is what happens if $n neq r$.
    – lisyarus
    yesterday














  • 1




    You mean $rank(A)$?
    – Patricio
    yesterday






  • 2




    @Yasmin, $A$ needs not be square, I think
    – Patricio
    yesterday








  • 1




    @Yasmin, that's my point, $A$ is $n times r$ and $n$ and $r$ need not be equal to each other.
    – Patricio
    yesterday






  • 2




    @Yasmin In case $n=r$, the question states that $rank(A)=n$, so it is automatically invertible. I guess the meat of the question is what happens if $n neq r$.
    – lisyarus
    yesterday








1




1




You mean $rank(A)$?
– Patricio
yesterday




You mean $rank(A)$?
– Patricio
yesterday




2




2




@Yasmin, $A$ needs not be square, I think
– Patricio
yesterday






@Yasmin, $A$ needs not be square, I think
– Patricio
yesterday






1




1




@Yasmin, that's my point, $A$ is $n times r$ and $n$ and $r$ need not be equal to each other.
– Patricio
yesterday




@Yasmin, that's my point, $A$ is $n times r$ and $n$ and $r$ need not be equal to each other.
– Patricio
yesterday




2




2




@Yasmin In case $n=r$, the question states that $rank(A)=n$, so it is automatically invertible. I guess the meat of the question is what happens if $n neq r$.
– lisyarus
yesterday




@Yasmin In case $n=r$, the question states that $rank(A)=n$, so it is automatically invertible. I guess the meat of the question is what happens if $n neq r$.
– lisyarus
yesterday










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
6
down vote













From $n=rank (AB)leqmin{rank (A),rank (B)}$ and also $rank(A)leqmin{n,r}$ you can deduce something about the size of $A$ and its rank.






share|cite|improve this answer




























    up vote
    6
    down vote













    Consider
    $$
    A=begin{bmatrix}1\0end{bmatrix}
    $$

    then
    $$
    AB=begin{bmatrix}1\0end{bmatrix}begin{bmatrix}b_1 & b_2end{bmatrix}=begin{bmatrix}b_1 & b_2\0 & 0end{bmatrix}.
    $$

    Do you see the trouble?






    share|cite|improve this answer




























      up vote
      4
      down vote













      One of the solution for $B$ is the Moore-Penrose inverse $A^+$ of $A$.

      Solution(s) exist as soon as $n le r$ and that $rank(A)=n$.

      If $n = r$, $B$ is the inverse of $A$.

      If $n < r$, the set of solutions corresponds to the Moore-Penrose inverse plus an element ($C$ such that $AC = 0$) owing to a set of dimension equal to $r-n$.

      Look at the corresponding Wikipendia entry for example.






      share|cite|improve this answer










      New contributor




      Damien is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.


















      • The Moore-Penrose inverse is just one of many other possibilities for $B$.
        – A.Γ.
        yesterday






      • 1




        @A.Γ. Of course. I was editing the answer when you commented it.
        – Damien
        yesterday










      • OP specified that $operatorname{rank}(A)=r$, so this disqualifies cases with $r>n$.
        – Federico Poloni
        yesterday










      • @FedericoPoloni The problem can only have a solution if $n le r$. I don't think that OP ignores this basic point. Therefore, I assumed it was a typo when OP writes $rank(A)=r$. It is also why in this answer, I insisted on this point in the second line, to avoid confusion.
        – Damien
        yesterday










      • I think OP is asking precisely an exercise about this basic point.
        – Federico Poloni
        yesterday


















      up vote
      1
      down vote













      Yet another sufficient way of doing this. Since $rank(A) = r$, we have $rleq n$. Thinking in terms of columns of $A$ will help you see this. You picked $r$ vectors in a $n$-dimensional space. Since $rank(A)=r$, they are all linearly independent. Since you can have only $n$ independent vectors at most in a $n$-dimensional space, $rleq n$. In case $r=n$, then $B=A^{-1}$. In case $r<n$, $B$ doesn't exist.To see this, observe that determinant of RHS is $1$ ($neq 0$). Now determinant of LHS (i.e. AB) is zero as it is not a full-rank matrix. To see that, you can think of columns of $AB$ as a linear combination of columns $A$. Since you took $r$ independent vectors and constructed $n(>r)$ vectors out of it, they have to be dependent and hence $AB$ should have determinant zero.






      share|cite|improve this answer























        Your Answer





        StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
        return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
        StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
        StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
        });
        });
        }, "mathjax-editing");

        StackExchange.ready(function() {
        var channelOptions = {
        tags: "".split(" "),
        id: "69"
        };
        initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
        // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
        if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
        createEditor();
        });
        }
        else {
        createEditor();
        }
        });

        function createEditor() {
        StackExchange.prepareEditor({
        heartbeatType: 'answer',
        convertImagesToLinks: true,
        noModals: true,
        showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
        reputationToPostImages: 10,
        bindNavPrevention: true,
        postfix: "",
        imageUploader: {
        brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
        contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
        allowUrls: true
        },
        noCode: true, onDemand: true,
        discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
        ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
        });


        }
        });














        draft saved

        draft discarded


















        StackExchange.ready(
        function () {
        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3025264%2fthe-existence-of-a-matrix%23new-answer', 'question_page');
        }
        );

        Post as a guest















        Required, but never shown

























        4 Answers
        4






        active

        oldest

        votes








        4 Answers
        4






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes








        up vote
        6
        down vote













        From $n=rank (AB)leqmin{rank (A),rank (B)}$ and also $rank(A)leqmin{n,r}$ you can deduce something about the size of $A$ and its rank.






        share|cite|improve this answer

























          up vote
          6
          down vote













          From $n=rank (AB)leqmin{rank (A),rank (B)}$ and also $rank(A)leqmin{n,r}$ you can deduce something about the size of $A$ and its rank.






          share|cite|improve this answer























            up vote
            6
            down vote










            up vote
            6
            down vote









            From $n=rank (AB)leqmin{rank (A),rank (B)}$ and also $rank(A)leqmin{n,r}$ you can deduce something about the size of $A$ and its rank.






            share|cite|improve this answer












            From $n=rank (AB)leqmin{rank (A),rank (B)}$ and also $rank(A)leqmin{n,r}$ you can deduce something about the size of $A$ and its rank.







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered yesterday









            AnyAD

            1,901811




            1,901811






















                up vote
                6
                down vote













                Consider
                $$
                A=begin{bmatrix}1\0end{bmatrix}
                $$

                then
                $$
                AB=begin{bmatrix}1\0end{bmatrix}begin{bmatrix}b_1 & b_2end{bmatrix}=begin{bmatrix}b_1 & b_2\0 & 0end{bmatrix}.
                $$

                Do you see the trouble?






                share|cite|improve this answer

























                  up vote
                  6
                  down vote













                  Consider
                  $$
                  A=begin{bmatrix}1\0end{bmatrix}
                  $$

                  then
                  $$
                  AB=begin{bmatrix}1\0end{bmatrix}begin{bmatrix}b_1 & b_2end{bmatrix}=begin{bmatrix}b_1 & b_2\0 & 0end{bmatrix}.
                  $$

                  Do you see the trouble?






                  share|cite|improve this answer























                    up vote
                    6
                    down vote










                    up vote
                    6
                    down vote









                    Consider
                    $$
                    A=begin{bmatrix}1\0end{bmatrix}
                    $$

                    then
                    $$
                    AB=begin{bmatrix}1\0end{bmatrix}begin{bmatrix}b_1 & b_2end{bmatrix}=begin{bmatrix}b_1 & b_2\0 & 0end{bmatrix}.
                    $$

                    Do you see the trouble?






                    share|cite|improve this answer












                    Consider
                    $$
                    A=begin{bmatrix}1\0end{bmatrix}
                    $$

                    then
                    $$
                    AB=begin{bmatrix}1\0end{bmatrix}begin{bmatrix}b_1 & b_2end{bmatrix}=begin{bmatrix}b_1 & b_2\0 & 0end{bmatrix}.
                    $$

                    Do you see the trouble?







                    share|cite|improve this answer












                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer










                    answered yesterday









                    A.Γ.

                    21.4k22455




                    21.4k22455






















                        up vote
                        4
                        down vote













                        One of the solution for $B$ is the Moore-Penrose inverse $A^+$ of $A$.

                        Solution(s) exist as soon as $n le r$ and that $rank(A)=n$.

                        If $n = r$, $B$ is the inverse of $A$.

                        If $n < r$, the set of solutions corresponds to the Moore-Penrose inverse plus an element ($C$ such that $AC = 0$) owing to a set of dimension equal to $r-n$.

                        Look at the corresponding Wikipendia entry for example.






                        share|cite|improve this answer










                        New contributor




                        Damien is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                        Check out our Code of Conduct.


















                        • The Moore-Penrose inverse is just one of many other possibilities for $B$.
                          – A.Γ.
                          yesterday






                        • 1




                          @A.Γ. Of course. I was editing the answer when you commented it.
                          – Damien
                          yesterday










                        • OP specified that $operatorname{rank}(A)=r$, so this disqualifies cases with $r>n$.
                          – Federico Poloni
                          yesterday










                        • @FedericoPoloni The problem can only have a solution if $n le r$. I don't think that OP ignores this basic point. Therefore, I assumed it was a typo when OP writes $rank(A)=r$. It is also why in this answer, I insisted on this point in the second line, to avoid confusion.
                          – Damien
                          yesterday










                        • I think OP is asking precisely an exercise about this basic point.
                          – Federico Poloni
                          yesterday















                        up vote
                        4
                        down vote













                        One of the solution for $B$ is the Moore-Penrose inverse $A^+$ of $A$.

                        Solution(s) exist as soon as $n le r$ and that $rank(A)=n$.

                        If $n = r$, $B$ is the inverse of $A$.

                        If $n < r$, the set of solutions corresponds to the Moore-Penrose inverse plus an element ($C$ such that $AC = 0$) owing to a set of dimension equal to $r-n$.

                        Look at the corresponding Wikipendia entry for example.






                        share|cite|improve this answer










                        New contributor




                        Damien is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                        Check out our Code of Conduct.


















                        • The Moore-Penrose inverse is just one of many other possibilities for $B$.
                          – A.Γ.
                          yesterday






                        • 1




                          @A.Γ. Of course. I was editing the answer when you commented it.
                          – Damien
                          yesterday










                        • OP specified that $operatorname{rank}(A)=r$, so this disqualifies cases with $r>n$.
                          – Federico Poloni
                          yesterday










                        • @FedericoPoloni The problem can only have a solution if $n le r$. I don't think that OP ignores this basic point. Therefore, I assumed it was a typo when OP writes $rank(A)=r$. It is also why in this answer, I insisted on this point in the second line, to avoid confusion.
                          – Damien
                          yesterday










                        • I think OP is asking precisely an exercise about this basic point.
                          – Federico Poloni
                          yesterday













                        up vote
                        4
                        down vote










                        up vote
                        4
                        down vote









                        One of the solution for $B$ is the Moore-Penrose inverse $A^+$ of $A$.

                        Solution(s) exist as soon as $n le r$ and that $rank(A)=n$.

                        If $n = r$, $B$ is the inverse of $A$.

                        If $n < r$, the set of solutions corresponds to the Moore-Penrose inverse plus an element ($C$ such that $AC = 0$) owing to a set of dimension equal to $r-n$.

                        Look at the corresponding Wikipendia entry for example.






                        share|cite|improve this answer










                        New contributor




                        Damien is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                        Check out our Code of Conduct.









                        One of the solution for $B$ is the Moore-Penrose inverse $A^+$ of $A$.

                        Solution(s) exist as soon as $n le r$ and that $rank(A)=n$.

                        If $n = r$, $B$ is the inverse of $A$.

                        If $n < r$, the set of solutions corresponds to the Moore-Penrose inverse plus an element ($C$ such that $AC = 0$) owing to a set of dimension equal to $r-n$.

                        Look at the corresponding Wikipendia entry for example.







                        share|cite|improve this answer










                        New contributor




                        Damien is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                        Check out our Code of Conduct.









                        share|cite|improve this answer



                        share|cite|improve this answer








                        edited yesterday





















                        New contributor




                        Damien is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                        Check out our Code of Conduct.









                        answered yesterday









                        Damien

                        2844




                        2844




                        New contributor




                        Damien is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                        Check out our Code of Conduct.





                        New contributor





                        Damien is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                        Check out our Code of Conduct.






                        Damien is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                        Check out our Code of Conduct.












                        • The Moore-Penrose inverse is just one of many other possibilities for $B$.
                          – A.Γ.
                          yesterday






                        • 1




                          @A.Γ. Of course. I was editing the answer when you commented it.
                          – Damien
                          yesterday










                        • OP specified that $operatorname{rank}(A)=r$, so this disqualifies cases with $r>n$.
                          – Federico Poloni
                          yesterday










                        • @FedericoPoloni The problem can only have a solution if $n le r$. I don't think that OP ignores this basic point. Therefore, I assumed it was a typo when OP writes $rank(A)=r$. It is also why in this answer, I insisted on this point in the second line, to avoid confusion.
                          – Damien
                          yesterday










                        • I think OP is asking precisely an exercise about this basic point.
                          – Federico Poloni
                          yesterday


















                        • The Moore-Penrose inverse is just one of many other possibilities for $B$.
                          – A.Γ.
                          yesterday






                        • 1




                          @A.Γ. Of course. I was editing the answer when you commented it.
                          – Damien
                          yesterday










                        • OP specified that $operatorname{rank}(A)=r$, so this disqualifies cases with $r>n$.
                          – Federico Poloni
                          yesterday










                        • @FedericoPoloni The problem can only have a solution if $n le r$. I don't think that OP ignores this basic point. Therefore, I assumed it was a typo when OP writes $rank(A)=r$. It is also why in this answer, I insisted on this point in the second line, to avoid confusion.
                          – Damien
                          yesterday










                        • I think OP is asking precisely an exercise about this basic point.
                          – Federico Poloni
                          yesterday
















                        The Moore-Penrose inverse is just one of many other possibilities for $B$.
                        – A.Γ.
                        yesterday




                        The Moore-Penrose inverse is just one of many other possibilities for $B$.
                        – A.Γ.
                        yesterday




                        1




                        1




                        @A.Γ. Of course. I was editing the answer when you commented it.
                        – Damien
                        yesterday




                        @A.Γ. Of course. I was editing the answer when you commented it.
                        – Damien
                        yesterday












                        OP specified that $operatorname{rank}(A)=r$, so this disqualifies cases with $r>n$.
                        – Federico Poloni
                        yesterday




                        OP specified that $operatorname{rank}(A)=r$, so this disqualifies cases with $r>n$.
                        – Federico Poloni
                        yesterday












                        @FedericoPoloni The problem can only have a solution if $n le r$. I don't think that OP ignores this basic point. Therefore, I assumed it was a typo when OP writes $rank(A)=r$. It is also why in this answer, I insisted on this point in the second line, to avoid confusion.
                        – Damien
                        yesterday




                        @FedericoPoloni The problem can only have a solution if $n le r$. I don't think that OP ignores this basic point. Therefore, I assumed it was a typo when OP writes $rank(A)=r$. It is also why in this answer, I insisted on this point in the second line, to avoid confusion.
                        – Damien
                        yesterday












                        I think OP is asking precisely an exercise about this basic point.
                        – Federico Poloni
                        yesterday




                        I think OP is asking precisely an exercise about this basic point.
                        – Federico Poloni
                        yesterday










                        up vote
                        1
                        down vote













                        Yet another sufficient way of doing this. Since $rank(A) = r$, we have $rleq n$. Thinking in terms of columns of $A$ will help you see this. You picked $r$ vectors in a $n$-dimensional space. Since $rank(A)=r$, they are all linearly independent. Since you can have only $n$ independent vectors at most in a $n$-dimensional space, $rleq n$. In case $r=n$, then $B=A^{-1}$. In case $r<n$, $B$ doesn't exist.To see this, observe that determinant of RHS is $1$ ($neq 0$). Now determinant of LHS (i.e. AB) is zero as it is not a full-rank matrix. To see that, you can think of columns of $AB$ as a linear combination of columns $A$. Since you took $r$ independent vectors and constructed $n(>r)$ vectors out of it, they have to be dependent and hence $AB$ should have determinant zero.






                        share|cite|improve this answer



























                          up vote
                          1
                          down vote













                          Yet another sufficient way of doing this. Since $rank(A) = r$, we have $rleq n$. Thinking in terms of columns of $A$ will help you see this. You picked $r$ vectors in a $n$-dimensional space. Since $rank(A)=r$, they are all linearly independent. Since you can have only $n$ independent vectors at most in a $n$-dimensional space, $rleq n$. In case $r=n$, then $B=A^{-1}$. In case $r<n$, $B$ doesn't exist.To see this, observe that determinant of RHS is $1$ ($neq 0$). Now determinant of LHS (i.e. AB) is zero as it is not a full-rank matrix. To see that, you can think of columns of $AB$ as a linear combination of columns $A$. Since you took $r$ independent vectors and constructed $n(>r)$ vectors out of it, they have to be dependent and hence $AB$ should have determinant zero.






                          share|cite|improve this answer

























                            up vote
                            1
                            down vote










                            up vote
                            1
                            down vote









                            Yet another sufficient way of doing this. Since $rank(A) = r$, we have $rleq n$. Thinking in terms of columns of $A$ will help you see this. You picked $r$ vectors in a $n$-dimensional space. Since $rank(A)=r$, they are all linearly independent. Since you can have only $n$ independent vectors at most in a $n$-dimensional space, $rleq n$. In case $r=n$, then $B=A^{-1}$. In case $r<n$, $B$ doesn't exist.To see this, observe that determinant of RHS is $1$ ($neq 0$). Now determinant of LHS (i.e. AB) is zero as it is not a full-rank matrix. To see that, you can think of columns of $AB$ as a linear combination of columns $A$. Since you took $r$ independent vectors and constructed $n(>r)$ vectors out of it, they have to be dependent and hence $AB$ should have determinant zero.






                            share|cite|improve this answer














                            Yet another sufficient way of doing this. Since $rank(A) = r$, we have $rleq n$. Thinking in terms of columns of $A$ will help you see this. You picked $r$ vectors in a $n$-dimensional space. Since $rank(A)=r$, they are all linearly independent. Since you can have only $n$ independent vectors at most in a $n$-dimensional space, $rleq n$. In case $r=n$, then $B=A^{-1}$. In case $r<n$, $B$ doesn't exist.To see this, observe that determinant of RHS is $1$ ($neq 0$). Now determinant of LHS (i.e. AB) is zero as it is not a full-rank matrix. To see that, you can think of columns of $AB$ as a linear combination of columns $A$. Since you took $r$ independent vectors and constructed $n(>r)$ vectors out of it, they have to be dependent and hence $AB$ should have determinant zero.







                            share|cite|improve this answer














                            share|cite|improve this answer



                            share|cite|improve this answer








                            edited yesterday

























                            answered yesterday









                            dineshdileep

                            5,85711735




                            5,85711735






























                                draft saved

                                draft discarded




















































                                Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid



                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                                Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                                Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid



                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                draft saved


                                draft discarded














                                StackExchange.ready(
                                function () {
                                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3025264%2fthe-existence-of-a-matrix%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                }
                                );

                                Post as a guest















                                Required, but never shown





















































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown

































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown







                                Popular posts from this blog

                                Mont Emei

                                Province de Neuquén

                                Journaliste