${ x in X : |f(x)| geq epsilon }$ is compact then $f$ is uniformly continuous on $X$.
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
Past year paper question.
Let $(X, d)$ be a metric space and let $f: X to mathbb{R}$ be a continuous function, where $mathbb{R}$ is given the standard metric. Assume that for any $epsilon > 0$, the set ${ x in X : |f(x)| geq epsilon }$ is a compact metric subspace of $X$. Show that $f$ is uniformly continuous on $X$.
Attempt:
Let $epsilon >0$ be given. Let $K := { x in X : |f(x)| geq frac{epsilon}{2} }$. $f$ is continuous on $K$ $implies f$ is uniform continuous on $K$. Then there exists $delta$ such that $d(x,y)<delta implies |f(x)-f(y)| < frac{epsilon}{2}$.
Take any $2$ points $x,y in X$, such that $d(x,y)<delta$. If $x,y in K$, then $|f(x)-f(y)| < frac{epsilon}{2} < epsilon$. If $x,y notin K$, then $|f(x)-f(y)| leq |f(x)|+|f(y)| leq frac{epsilon}{2} + frac{epsilon}{2} leq epsilon$.
But I am stuck here, because what if $x in K$ and $y notin K$.
analysis metric-spaces
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
Past year paper question.
Let $(X, d)$ be a metric space and let $f: X to mathbb{R}$ be a continuous function, where $mathbb{R}$ is given the standard metric. Assume that for any $epsilon > 0$, the set ${ x in X : |f(x)| geq epsilon }$ is a compact metric subspace of $X$. Show that $f$ is uniformly continuous on $X$.
Attempt:
Let $epsilon >0$ be given. Let $K := { x in X : |f(x)| geq frac{epsilon}{2} }$. $f$ is continuous on $K$ $implies f$ is uniform continuous on $K$. Then there exists $delta$ such that $d(x,y)<delta implies |f(x)-f(y)| < frac{epsilon}{2}$.
Take any $2$ points $x,y in X$, such that $d(x,y)<delta$. If $x,y in K$, then $|f(x)-f(y)| < frac{epsilon}{2} < epsilon$. If $x,y notin K$, then $|f(x)-f(y)| leq |f(x)|+|f(y)| leq frac{epsilon}{2} + frac{epsilon}{2} leq epsilon$.
But I am stuck here, because what if $x in K$ and $y notin K$.
analysis metric-spaces
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
Past year paper question.
Let $(X, d)$ be a metric space and let $f: X to mathbb{R}$ be a continuous function, where $mathbb{R}$ is given the standard metric. Assume that for any $epsilon > 0$, the set ${ x in X : |f(x)| geq epsilon }$ is a compact metric subspace of $X$. Show that $f$ is uniformly continuous on $X$.
Attempt:
Let $epsilon >0$ be given. Let $K := { x in X : |f(x)| geq frac{epsilon}{2} }$. $f$ is continuous on $K$ $implies f$ is uniform continuous on $K$. Then there exists $delta$ such that $d(x,y)<delta implies |f(x)-f(y)| < frac{epsilon}{2}$.
Take any $2$ points $x,y in X$, such that $d(x,y)<delta$. If $x,y in K$, then $|f(x)-f(y)| < frac{epsilon}{2} < epsilon$. If $x,y notin K$, then $|f(x)-f(y)| leq |f(x)|+|f(y)| leq frac{epsilon}{2} + frac{epsilon}{2} leq epsilon$.
But I am stuck here, because what if $x in K$ and $y notin K$.
analysis metric-spaces
Past year paper question.
Let $(X, d)$ be a metric space and let $f: X to mathbb{R}$ be a continuous function, where $mathbb{R}$ is given the standard metric. Assume that for any $epsilon > 0$, the set ${ x in X : |f(x)| geq epsilon }$ is a compact metric subspace of $X$. Show that $f$ is uniformly continuous on $X$.
Attempt:
Let $epsilon >0$ be given. Let $K := { x in X : |f(x)| geq frac{epsilon}{2} }$. $f$ is continuous on $K$ $implies f$ is uniform continuous on $K$. Then there exists $delta$ such that $d(x,y)<delta implies |f(x)-f(y)| < frac{epsilon}{2}$.
Take any $2$ points $x,y in X$, such that $d(x,y)<delta$. If $x,y in K$, then $|f(x)-f(y)| < frac{epsilon}{2} < epsilon$. If $x,y notin K$, then $|f(x)-f(y)| leq |f(x)|+|f(y)| leq frac{epsilon}{2} + frac{epsilon}{2} leq epsilon$.
But I am stuck here, because what if $x in K$ and $y notin K$.
analysis metric-spaces
analysis metric-spaces
asked Nov 20 at 3:05
eatfood
1827
1827
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
Suppose $f$ is not uniformly continuous. Then there exists $delta >0$ and sequences ${x_n},{y_n}$ such that $d(x_n,y_n) to 0$ but $|f(x_n)-f(y_n)| geq delta$ for each $n$. For each $n$ either $|f(x_n)| geq delta /2$ or $|f(y_n)| geq delta /2$. One of these holds for infinitely many $n$. Suppose $|f(x_n)| geq delta/2 $ along a subsequence. The hypothesis tells you that the subsequence lies in a compact set, so it has a convergent subsequence. Along this subsequence both sequences ${x_n},{y_n}$ converge to the same limit $x$ because $d(x_n,y_n) to 0$. This contradicts continuity of $f$ at $x$.
Writing out formally, So $(x_{n_k}) to x$ for some subsequence. Then $(y_{n_k}) to x$ too, since $|x_{n_k} - y_{n_k}| to 0$. But $lim_{kto infty}f(x_{n_k}) neq lim_{kto infty}f(y_{n_k})$, since $|f(x_{n_k})-f(y_{n_k})| geq delta$. Contradicting continuity of $f$ at $x$.
– eatfood
Nov 20 at 7:05
This has solved my problem, thank you!
– eatfood
Nov 20 at 7:06
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
Suppose $f$ is not uniformly continuous. Then there exists $delta >0$ and sequences ${x_n},{y_n}$ such that $d(x_n,y_n) to 0$ but $|f(x_n)-f(y_n)| geq delta$ for each $n$. For each $n$ either $|f(x_n)| geq delta /2$ or $|f(y_n)| geq delta /2$. One of these holds for infinitely many $n$. Suppose $|f(x_n)| geq delta/2 $ along a subsequence. The hypothesis tells you that the subsequence lies in a compact set, so it has a convergent subsequence. Along this subsequence both sequences ${x_n},{y_n}$ converge to the same limit $x$ because $d(x_n,y_n) to 0$. This contradicts continuity of $f$ at $x$.
Writing out formally, So $(x_{n_k}) to x$ for some subsequence. Then $(y_{n_k}) to x$ too, since $|x_{n_k} - y_{n_k}| to 0$. But $lim_{kto infty}f(x_{n_k}) neq lim_{kto infty}f(y_{n_k})$, since $|f(x_{n_k})-f(y_{n_k})| geq delta$. Contradicting continuity of $f$ at $x$.
– eatfood
Nov 20 at 7:05
This has solved my problem, thank you!
– eatfood
Nov 20 at 7:06
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
Suppose $f$ is not uniformly continuous. Then there exists $delta >0$ and sequences ${x_n},{y_n}$ such that $d(x_n,y_n) to 0$ but $|f(x_n)-f(y_n)| geq delta$ for each $n$. For each $n$ either $|f(x_n)| geq delta /2$ or $|f(y_n)| geq delta /2$. One of these holds for infinitely many $n$. Suppose $|f(x_n)| geq delta/2 $ along a subsequence. The hypothesis tells you that the subsequence lies in a compact set, so it has a convergent subsequence. Along this subsequence both sequences ${x_n},{y_n}$ converge to the same limit $x$ because $d(x_n,y_n) to 0$. This contradicts continuity of $f$ at $x$.
Writing out formally, So $(x_{n_k}) to x$ for some subsequence. Then $(y_{n_k}) to x$ too, since $|x_{n_k} - y_{n_k}| to 0$. But $lim_{kto infty}f(x_{n_k}) neq lim_{kto infty}f(y_{n_k})$, since $|f(x_{n_k})-f(y_{n_k})| geq delta$. Contradicting continuity of $f$ at $x$.
– eatfood
Nov 20 at 7:05
This has solved my problem, thank you!
– eatfood
Nov 20 at 7:06
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
Suppose $f$ is not uniformly continuous. Then there exists $delta >0$ and sequences ${x_n},{y_n}$ such that $d(x_n,y_n) to 0$ but $|f(x_n)-f(y_n)| geq delta$ for each $n$. For each $n$ either $|f(x_n)| geq delta /2$ or $|f(y_n)| geq delta /2$. One of these holds for infinitely many $n$. Suppose $|f(x_n)| geq delta/2 $ along a subsequence. The hypothesis tells you that the subsequence lies in a compact set, so it has a convergent subsequence. Along this subsequence both sequences ${x_n},{y_n}$ converge to the same limit $x$ because $d(x_n,y_n) to 0$. This contradicts continuity of $f$ at $x$.
Suppose $f$ is not uniformly continuous. Then there exists $delta >0$ and sequences ${x_n},{y_n}$ such that $d(x_n,y_n) to 0$ but $|f(x_n)-f(y_n)| geq delta$ for each $n$. For each $n$ either $|f(x_n)| geq delta /2$ or $|f(y_n)| geq delta /2$. One of these holds for infinitely many $n$. Suppose $|f(x_n)| geq delta/2 $ along a subsequence. The hypothesis tells you that the subsequence lies in a compact set, so it has a convergent subsequence. Along this subsequence both sequences ${x_n},{y_n}$ converge to the same limit $x$ because $d(x_n,y_n) to 0$. This contradicts continuity of $f$ at $x$.
answered Nov 20 at 6:37
Kavi Rama Murthy
44.4k31852
44.4k31852
Writing out formally, So $(x_{n_k}) to x$ for some subsequence. Then $(y_{n_k}) to x$ too, since $|x_{n_k} - y_{n_k}| to 0$. But $lim_{kto infty}f(x_{n_k}) neq lim_{kto infty}f(y_{n_k})$, since $|f(x_{n_k})-f(y_{n_k})| geq delta$. Contradicting continuity of $f$ at $x$.
– eatfood
Nov 20 at 7:05
This has solved my problem, thank you!
– eatfood
Nov 20 at 7:06
add a comment |
Writing out formally, So $(x_{n_k}) to x$ for some subsequence. Then $(y_{n_k}) to x$ too, since $|x_{n_k} - y_{n_k}| to 0$. But $lim_{kto infty}f(x_{n_k}) neq lim_{kto infty}f(y_{n_k})$, since $|f(x_{n_k})-f(y_{n_k})| geq delta$. Contradicting continuity of $f$ at $x$.
– eatfood
Nov 20 at 7:05
This has solved my problem, thank you!
– eatfood
Nov 20 at 7:06
Writing out formally, So $(x_{n_k}) to x$ for some subsequence. Then $(y_{n_k}) to x$ too, since $|x_{n_k} - y_{n_k}| to 0$. But $lim_{kto infty}f(x_{n_k}) neq lim_{kto infty}f(y_{n_k})$, since $|f(x_{n_k})-f(y_{n_k})| geq delta$. Contradicting continuity of $f$ at $x$.
– eatfood
Nov 20 at 7:05
Writing out formally, So $(x_{n_k}) to x$ for some subsequence. Then $(y_{n_k}) to x$ too, since $|x_{n_k} - y_{n_k}| to 0$. But $lim_{kto infty}f(x_{n_k}) neq lim_{kto infty}f(y_{n_k})$, since $|f(x_{n_k})-f(y_{n_k})| geq delta$. Contradicting continuity of $f$ at $x$.
– eatfood
Nov 20 at 7:05
This has solved my problem, thank you!
– eatfood
Nov 20 at 7:06
This has solved my problem, thank you!
– eatfood
Nov 20 at 7:06
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3005882%2fx-in-x-fx-geq-epsilon-is-compact-then-f-is-uniformly-continuo%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown