Probability of a car accident given that a man is driving (Bayes formula)












0












$begingroup$


I came across the following exercise illustrating the Bayes formula:




Let's consider the events: F = {female driver}, G = {male driver}, and
A = {car accident}. We also know that P(A|F) = a, P(A|G) = b, and
P(F) = P(G) = 1/2. Compute P(A).




Then the solution simply gives the formula for computing P(A). But I don't understand the meaning of events such as $A cap F$. When we define the events F, G and A, what is the sample space $Omega$? Is it the cartesian product of two sample spaces $ Omega_1 = {$female driver, male driver$}$ and $ Omega_2 = {$accident, no accident$}$?



In this case, the events should be defined as follows: F = ${$ (female driver, accident), (female driver, no accident) $}$, and A= ${$ (female driver, accident), (male driver, accident) $}$. Therefore, events such as $A cap F$ can be properly defined: $A cap F$ = ${$ (female driver, accident) $}$.



Is my understanding correct?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    the title is incredibly sexist-sounding.
    $endgroup$
    – Lost1
    Jan 15 '14 at 15:08










  • $begingroup$
    Your understanding looks correct to me.
    $endgroup$
    – Milo Brandt
    Nov 29 '14 at 1:37
















0












$begingroup$


I came across the following exercise illustrating the Bayes formula:




Let's consider the events: F = {female driver}, G = {male driver}, and
A = {car accident}. We also know that P(A|F) = a, P(A|G) = b, and
P(F) = P(G) = 1/2. Compute P(A).




Then the solution simply gives the formula for computing P(A). But I don't understand the meaning of events such as $A cap F$. When we define the events F, G and A, what is the sample space $Omega$? Is it the cartesian product of two sample spaces $ Omega_1 = {$female driver, male driver$}$ and $ Omega_2 = {$accident, no accident$}$?



In this case, the events should be defined as follows: F = ${$ (female driver, accident), (female driver, no accident) $}$, and A= ${$ (female driver, accident), (male driver, accident) $}$. Therefore, events such as $A cap F$ can be properly defined: $A cap F$ = ${$ (female driver, accident) $}$.



Is my understanding correct?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    the title is incredibly sexist-sounding.
    $endgroup$
    – Lost1
    Jan 15 '14 at 15:08










  • $begingroup$
    Your understanding looks correct to me.
    $endgroup$
    – Milo Brandt
    Nov 29 '14 at 1:37














0












0








0





$begingroup$


I came across the following exercise illustrating the Bayes formula:




Let's consider the events: F = {female driver}, G = {male driver}, and
A = {car accident}. We also know that P(A|F) = a, P(A|G) = b, and
P(F) = P(G) = 1/2. Compute P(A).




Then the solution simply gives the formula for computing P(A). But I don't understand the meaning of events such as $A cap F$. When we define the events F, G and A, what is the sample space $Omega$? Is it the cartesian product of two sample spaces $ Omega_1 = {$female driver, male driver$}$ and $ Omega_2 = {$accident, no accident$}$?



In this case, the events should be defined as follows: F = ${$ (female driver, accident), (female driver, no accident) $}$, and A= ${$ (female driver, accident), (male driver, accident) $}$. Therefore, events such as $A cap F$ can be properly defined: $A cap F$ = ${$ (female driver, accident) $}$.



Is my understanding correct?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




I came across the following exercise illustrating the Bayes formula:




Let's consider the events: F = {female driver}, G = {male driver}, and
A = {car accident}. We also know that P(A|F) = a, P(A|G) = b, and
P(F) = P(G) = 1/2. Compute P(A).




Then the solution simply gives the formula for computing P(A). But I don't understand the meaning of events such as $A cap F$. When we define the events F, G and A, what is the sample space $Omega$? Is it the cartesian product of two sample spaces $ Omega_1 = {$female driver, male driver$}$ and $ Omega_2 = {$accident, no accident$}$?



In this case, the events should be defined as follows: F = ${$ (female driver, accident), (female driver, no accident) $}$, and A= ${$ (female driver, accident), (male driver, accident) $}$. Therefore, events such as $A cap F$ can be properly defined: $A cap F$ = ${$ (female driver, accident) $}$.



Is my understanding correct?







probability conditional-probability bayes-theorem






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 15 '14 at 15:11







usual me

















asked Jan 15 '14 at 15:02









usual meusual me

378210




378210








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    the title is incredibly sexist-sounding.
    $endgroup$
    – Lost1
    Jan 15 '14 at 15:08










  • $begingroup$
    Your understanding looks correct to me.
    $endgroup$
    – Milo Brandt
    Nov 29 '14 at 1:37














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    the title is incredibly sexist-sounding.
    $endgroup$
    – Lost1
    Jan 15 '14 at 15:08










  • $begingroup$
    Your understanding looks correct to me.
    $endgroup$
    – Milo Brandt
    Nov 29 '14 at 1:37








1




1




$begingroup$
the title is incredibly sexist-sounding.
$endgroup$
– Lost1
Jan 15 '14 at 15:08




$begingroup$
the title is incredibly sexist-sounding.
$endgroup$
– Lost1
Jan 15 '14 at 15:08












$begingroup$
Your understanding looks correct to me.
$endgroup$
– Milo Brandt
Nov 29 '14 at 1:37




$begingroup$
Your understanding looks correct to me.
$endgroup$
– Milo Brandt
Nov 29 '14 at 1:37










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















0












$begingroup$

P(A) = P(A,G) + P(A,F)               //Marginalization
P(A) = P(A|G) P(G) + P(A|F) P(F) //Chain Rule
P(A) = b(1/2) + a(1/2)
P(A) = (a+b)/2


I'm guessing this would be the solution given? If not, please specify. It would help explain the solution better






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$





















    0












    $begingroup$

    Hint -



    In this question intersection of two events not given. You have to find that first.



    For example -



    $P(A|F) = frac{P(A cap F)}{P(F)}$






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      });
      });
      }, "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f639325%2fprobability-of-a-car-accident-given-that-a-man-is-driving-bayes-formula%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      0












      $begingroup$

      P(A) = P(A,G) + P(A,F)               //Marginalization
      P(A) = P(A|G) P(G) + P(A|F) P(F) //Chain Rule
      P(A) = b(1/2) + a(1/2)
      P(A) = (a+b)/2


      I'm guessing this would be the solution given? If not, please specify. It would help explain the solution better






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$


















        0












        $begingroup$

        P(A) = P(A,G) + P(A,F)               //Marginalization
        P(A) = P(A|G) P(G) + P(A|F) P(F) //Chain Rule
        P(A) = b(1/2) + a(1/2)
        P(A) = (a+b)/2


        I'm guessing this would be the solution given? If not, please specify. It would help explain the solution better






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$
















          0












          0








          0





          $begingroup$

          P(A) = P(A,G) + P(A,F)               //Marginalization
          P(A) = P(A|G) P(G) + P(A|F) P(F) //Chain Rule
          P(A) = b(1/2) + a(1/2)
          P(A) = (a+b)/2


          I'm guessing this would be the solution given? If not, please specify. It would help explain the solution better






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          P(A) = P(A,G) + P(A,F)               //Marginalization
          P(A) = P(A|G) P(G) + P(A|F) P(F) //Chain Rule
          P(A) = b(1/2) + a(1/2)
          P(A) = (a+b)/2


          I'm guessing this would be the solution given? If not, please specify. It would help explain the solution better







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Nov 29 '14 at 1:34









          Sunil D SSunil D S

          11




          11























              0












              $begingroup$

              Hint -



              In this question intersection of two events not given. You have to find that first.



              For example -



              $P(A|F) = frac{P(A cap F)}{P(F)}$






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$


















                0












                $begingroup$

                Hint -



                In this question intersection of two events not given. You have to find that first.



                For example -



                $P(A|F) = frac{P(A cap F)}{P(F)}$






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$
















                  0












                  0








                  0





                  $begingroup$

                  Hint -



                  In this question intersection of two events not given. You have to find that first.



                  For example -



                  $P(A|F) = frac{P(A cap F)}{P(F)}$






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  Hint -



                  In this question intersection of two events not given. You have to find that first.



                  For example -



                  $P(A|F) = frac{P(A cap F)}{P(F)}$







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered Jun 2 '17 at 2:22









                  Kanwaljit SinghKanwaljit Singh

                  8,5201516




                  8,5201516






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f639325%2fprobability-of-a-car-accident-given-that-a-man-is-driving-bayes-formula%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Quarter-circle Tiles

                      build a pushdown automaton that recognizes the reverse language of a given pushdown automaton?

                      Mont Emei