Prove that set is convex. [closed]












0












$begingroup$


How to prove that these two sets are convex for certain $p$?
And for what p they will not be convex?
$$A= {(x,y) in Bbb R^2 : |x|^p+|y|^p le 1, p in Bbb R}$$
$$B = {(x,y) in Bbb R^2 : x>0,y>0, x^p+y^p le 1, p in Bbb R}$$










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$



closed as off-topic by Saad, José Carlos Santos, Chinnapparaj R, Brahadeesh, Vidyanshu Mishra Dec 1 '18 at 13:32


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – Saad, José Carlos Santos, Chinnapparaj R, Brahadeesh, Vidyanshu Mishra

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.













  • $begingroup$
    In the first case if we assume that $p$ is positive, it is quite obvious, but I can't prove it strictly.
    $endgroup$
    – nutcracker
    Dec 1 '18 at 8:29






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Can you check the equation again to make sure that is the question without typo or missing information? also, please include your attempt.
    $endgroup$
    – Siong Thye Goh
    Dec 1 '18 at 8:30










  • $begingroup$
    Everything is fine. What's the problem? I understand how these two sets will look for the positive $p$, but what about strict proff? I can't manage with it. The only way to prove it that I know is to show that $forall x,y in A rightarrow {z in A: z=(1-lambda)x+lambda y in A, lambda in [0,1] }$
    $endgroup$
    – nutcracker
    Dec 1 '18 at 8:34












  • $begingroup$
    Assuming $R$ are the reals, did you try to apply the definition of your last comment? Let x be the point nearer to the origin and show that each point between x and y is also in the disk.
    $endgroup$
    – Jasper
    Dec 1 '18 at 8:45










  • $begingroup$
    I do not understand how the definition will look like applied to the condition of the set
    $endgroup$
    – nutcracker
    Dec 1 '18 at 8:48
















0












$begingroup$


How to prove that these two sets are convex for certain $p$?
And for what p they will not be convex?
$$A= {(x,y) in Bbb R^2 : |x|^p+|y|^p le 1, p in Bbb R}$$
$$B = {(x,y) in Bbb R^2 : x>0,y>0, x^p+y^p le 1, p in Bbb R}$$










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$



closed as off-topic by Saad, José Carlos Santos, Chinnapparaj R, Brahadeesh, Vidyanshu Mishra Dec 1 '18 at 13:32


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – Saad, José Carlos Santos, Chinnapparaj R, Brahadeesh, Vidyanshu Mishra

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.













  • $begingroup$
    In the first case if we assume that $p$ is positive, it is quite obvious, but I can't prove it strictly.
    $endgroup$
    – nutcracker
    Dec 1 '18 at 8:29






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Can you check the equation again to make sure that is the question without typo or missing information? also, please include your attempt.
    $endgroup$
    – Siong Thye Goh
    Dec 1 '18 at 8:30










  • $begingroup$
    Everything is fine. What's the problem? I understand how these two sets will look for the positive $p$, but what about strict proff? I can't manage with it. The only way to prove it that I know is to show that $forall x,y in A rightarrow {z in A: z=(1-lambda)x+lambda y in A, lambda in [0,1] }$
    $endgroup$
    – nutcracker
    Dec 1 '18 at 8:34












  • $begingroup$
    Assuming $R$ are the reals, did you try to apply the definition of your last comment? Let x be the point nearer to the origin and show that each point between x and y is also in the disk.
    $endgroup$
    – Jasper
    Dec 1 '18 at 8:45










  • $begingroup$
    I do not understand how the definition will look like applied to the condition of the set
    $endgroup$
    – nutcracker
    Dec 1 '18 at 8:48














0












0








0





$begingroup$


How to prove that these two sets are convex for certain $p$?
And for what p they will not be convex?
$$A= {(x,y) in Bbb R^2 : |x|^p+|y|^p le 1, p in Bbb R}$$
$$B = {(x,y) in Bbb R^2 : x>0,y>0, x^p+y^p le 1, p in Bbb R}$$










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




How to prove that these two sets are convex for certain $p$?
And for what p they will not be convex?
$$A= {(x,y) in Bbb R^2 : |x|^p+|y|^p le 1, p in Bbb R}$$
$$B = {(x,y) in Bbb R^2 : x>0,y>0, x^p+y^p le 1, p in Bbb R}$$







convex-analysis convex-optimization






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 1 '18 at 9:24









Asaf Karagila

302k32427757




302k32427757










asked Dec 1 '18 at 8:27









nutcrackernutcracker

84




84




closed as off-topic by Saad, José Carlos Santos, Chinnapparaj R, Brahadeesh, Vidyanshu Mishra Dec 1 '18 at 13:32


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – Saad, José Carlos Santos, Chinnapparaj R, Brahadeesh, Vidyanshu Mishra

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.




closed as off-topic by Saad, José Carlos Santos, Chinnapparaj R, Brahadeesh, Vidyanshu Mishra Dec 1 '18 at 13:32


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – Saad, José Carlos Santos, Chinnapparaj R, Brahadeesh, Vidyanshu Mishra

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.












  • $begingroup$
    In the first case if we assume that $p$ is positive, it is quite obvious, but I can't prove it strictly.
    $endgroup$
    – nutcracker
    Dec 1 '18 at 8:29






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Can you check the equation again to make sure that is the question without typo or missing information? also, please include your attempt.
    $endgroup$
    – Siong Thye Goh
    Dec 1 '18 at 8:30










  • $begingroup$
    Everything is fine. What's the problem? I understand how these two sets will look for the positive $p$, but what about strict proff? I can't manage with it. The only way to prove it that I know is to show that $forall x,y in A rightarrow {z in A: z=(1-lambda)x+lambda y in A, lambda in [0,1] }$
    $endgroup$
    – nutcracker
    Dec 1 '18 at 8:34












  • $begingroup$
    Assuming $R$ are the reals, did you try to apply the definition of your last comment? Let x be the point nearer to the origin and show that each point between x and y is also in the disk.
    $endgroup$
    – Jasper
    Dec 1 '18 at 8:45










  • $begingroup$
    I do not understand how the definition will look like applied to the condition of the set
    $endgroup$
    – nutcracker
    Dec 1 '18 at 8:48


















  • $begingroup$
    In the first case if we assume that $p$ is positive, it is quite obvious, but I can't prove it strictly.
    $endgroup$
    – nutcracker
    Dec 1 '18 at 8:29






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Can you check the equation again to make sure that is the question without typo or missing information? also, please include your attempt.
    $endgroup$
    – Siong Thye Goh
    Dec 1 '18 at 8:30










  • $begingroup$
    Everything is fine. What's the problem? I understand how these two sets will look for the positive $p$, but what about strict proff? I can't manage with it. The only way to prove it that I know is to show that $forall x,y in A rightarrow {z in A: z=(1-lambda)x+lambda y in A, lambda in [0,1] }$
    $endgroup$
    – nutcracker
    Dec 1 '18 at 8:34












  • $begingroup$
    Assuming $R$ are the reals, did you try to apply the definition of your last comment? Let x be the point nearer to the origin and show that each point between x and y is also in the disk.
    $endgroup$
    – Jasper
    Dec 1 '18 at 8:45










  • $begingroup$
    I do not understand how the definition will look like applied to the condition of the set
    $endgroup$
    – nutcracker
    Dec 1 '18 at 8:48
















$begingroup$
In the first case if we assume that $p$ is positive, it is quite obvious, but I can't prove it strictly.
$endgroup$
– nutcracker
Dec 1 '18 at 8:29




$begingroup$
In the first case if we assume that $p$ is positive, it is quite obvious, but I can't prove it strictly.
$endgroup$
– nutcracker
Dec 1 '18 at 8:29




1




1




$begingroup$
Can you check the equation again to make sure that is the question without typo or missing information? also, please include your attempt.
$endgroup$
– Siong Thye Goh
Dec 1 '18 at 8:30




$begingroup$
Can you check the equation again to make sure that is the question without typo or missing information? also, please include your attempt.
$endgroup$
– Siong Thye Goh
Dec 1 '18 at 8:30












$begingroup$
Everything is fine. What's the problem? I understand how these two sets will look for the positive $p$, but what about strict proff? I can't manage with it. The only way to prove it that I know is to show that $forall x,y in A rightarrow {z in A: z=(1-lambda)x+lambda y in A, lambda in [0,1] }$
$endgroup$
– nutcracker
Dec 1 '18 at 8:34






$begingroup$
Everything is fine. What's the problem? I understand how these two sets will look for the positive $p$, but what about strict proff? I can't manage with it. The only way to prove it that I know is to show that $forall x,y in A rightarrow {z in A: z=(1-lambda)x+lambda y in A, lambda in [0,1] }$
$endgroup$
– nutcracker
Dec 1 '18 at 8:34














$begingroup$
Assuming $R$ are the reals, did you try to apply the definition of your last comment? Let x be the point nearer to the origin and show that each point between x and y is also in the disk.
$endgroup$
– Jasper
Dec 1 '18 at 8:45




$begingroup$
Assuming $R$ are the reals, did you try to apply the definition of your last comment? Let x be the point nearer to the origin and show that each point between x and y is also in the disk.
$endgroup$
– Jasper
Dec 1 '18 at 8:45












$begingroup$
I do not understand how the definition will look like applied to the condition of the set
$endgroup$
– nutcracker
Dec 1 '18 at 8:48




$begingroup$
I do not understand how the definition will look like applied to the condition of the set
$endgroup$
– nutcracker
Dec 1 '18 at 8:48










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0












$begingroup$


$forall x,y in A rightarrow {z in A: z=(1-lambda)x+lambda y in A, lambda in [0,1] }$



I do not understand how the definition will look like applied to the condition of the set




Obviously your problem is understanding how the set is defined:



The set does not contain elements $x$ and $y$, but it cointas elements of the form $(x,y)$.



So $(x_1,y_1)$ and $(x_2,y_2)$ are two elements in the set.



You'll have to prove that $(x_3,y_3) = ((1-lambda)x_1+lambda x_2,(1-lambda)y_1+lambda y_2)$ also is an element of the set if $(x_1,y_1)$ and $(x_2,y_2)$ are elements of the set and $0<lambda<1$.




$B = { ... }$




This set could also be written as:



$B={(x,y)inmathbb R:x>0,y>0,(x,y)in A}$



(By the way: Is the notation "$mathbb R$" correct here or should it be "$mathbb R^2$"?)



In the first step you will already have proven that $(x_3,y_3)in A$ if $(x_1,y_1)in A land (x_2,y_2) in A$.



This means you only need to prove that $x_3>0$ and $y_3>0$ if $(x_1,y_1)in B land (x_2,y_2)in B$.



EDIT




It is not obvious what shall to do next




Unfortunately I don't know if I have the right answer here, either. I was thinking that your only problem is understanding the definition of the set.



However I would try to do the following:



The points $(0,1)$ and $(1,0)$ are elements of the set $A$. If the set is convex, the point $(frac{1}{2},frac{1}{2})$ is also an element of the set.



This means:



$(frac{1}{2})^p+(frac{1}{2})^pleq 1\
Rightarrow 2(frac{1}{2})^pleq 1\
Rightarrow 2leq 2^p$



This condition is obviously not true for $p<1$ so the set $A$ can only be convex for $pgeq 1$.



Proving this for the set $B$ will be harder because $(0,1)notin B$...



You may argue with the points $(1-2epsilon,2delta)$, $(2delta,1-2epsilon)$ and with limit calculation: If $delta$ and $epsilon$ are small enough...



To prove that $A$ is convex for all $pgeq 1$ I'd first define a modified variant of the set $B$:



$C={(x,y) : xgeq 0, ygeq 0, |x|^p+|y|^pleq 1}={(x,y) : xgeq 0, ygeq 0, x^p+y^pleq 1}$



The following inequations are true for every element in the set:



$x_1^p + y_1^p leq 1\
x_2^p + y_2^p leq 1$



And because $0leqlambdaleq 1$:



$lambda x_1^p + lambda y_1^p leq lambda\
(1-lambda)x_2^p + (1-lambda)y_2^p leq 1-lambda$



$Rightarrow lambda x_1^p + (1-lambda)x_2^p + lambda y_1^p + (1-lambda)y_2^p leq 1$



We can now have a look at the following function:



$f(x)=x^p, xin[0,infty), p>1\
f'(x)=px^{p-1}geq 0\
f''(x)=p(p-1)x^{p-2}geq 0$



When using the properties of convex and concave functions we see that:



$lambda f(x_1)+(1-lambda) f(x_2)geq f(lambda x_1+(1-lambda)x_2)$



(I don't know if you are allowed to use this in some university homework!)



For $f(x)=x$, which means $p=1$, this is also true.



This means:



$lambda x_1^p+(1-lambda) x_2^pgeq (lambda x_1+(1-lambda)x_2)^p$



Or:



$x_3^p+y_3^p = (lambda x_1 + (1-lambda)x_2)^p + (lambda y_1 + (1-lambda)y_2)^p \ leq lambda x_1^p + (1-lambda)x_2^p + lambda y_1^p + (1-lambda)y_2^p leq 1$



Therefore $(x_3,y_3)in C$.



Now we can also define another set:



$D={(x,y) : ygeq 0, |x|^p+|y|^pleq 1}={(x,y) : (x,y) in C lor (-x,y) in C}$



It should be easy to prove that this set is also convex; we have to distinguish three cases:




  • $x_1,x_2geq 0 Rightarrow (x_3,y_3)in C Rightarrow (x_3,y_3)in D$

  • $x_1,x_2leq 0 Rightarrow (-x_3,y_3)in C Rightarrow (x_3,y_3)in D$


  • $x_1$ and $x_2$ have different signs:

    This case is a bit more difficult; we first have to prove that the set contains an element $(0,y_0)$ "between" the points $(x_1,y_1)$ and $(x_2,y_2)$...


Now the set $A$ can be written as: $A={(x,y):(x,y)in Dlor (x,-y)in D}$.



The steps needed to prove that $A$ is convex when knowing that $D$ is convex are the same steps needed to prove that $D$ is convex when knowing that $C$ is convex.



EDIT 2



I just thought about the cases $pleq 0$:



My proof that $A$ is not convex unfortunately will not work for $pleq 0$; however you can easily show that $A$ cannot be convex for $p<0$ because $(x,y)in A Rightarrow (-x,-y)in A$ but $(0,0)notin A$.



However $B$ seems to be convex for $p<0$!






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    So for the first case that means that the following should be right: $|(1-lambda)x_1+lambda x_2|^p+|(1-lambda)y_1+lambda y_2|^p le 1$
    $endgroup$
    – nutcracker
    Dec 1 '18 at 9:11










  • $begingroup$
    It is not obvious what shall to do next :(
    $endgroup$
    – nutcracker
    Dec 1 '18 at 9:43












  • $begingroup$
    @Daniil I've made an edit...
    $endgroup$
    – Martin Rosenau
    Dec 1 '18 at 12:29










  • $begingroup$
    Thank you a lot! Amazing!!!
    $endgroup$
    – nutcracker
    Dec 1 '18 at 14:30










  • $begingroup$
    @Daniil Please see my second edit about the set $B$.
    $endgroup$
    – Martin Rosenau
    Dec 2 '18 at 18:00


















1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









0












$begingroup$


$forall x,y in A rightarrow {z in A: z=(1-lambda)x+lambda y in A, lambda in [0,1] }$



I do not understand how the definition will look like applied to the condition of the set




Obviously your problem is understanding how the set is defined:



The set does not contain elements $x$ and $y$, but it cointas elements of the form $(x,y)$.



So $(x_1,y_1)$ and $(x_2,y_2)$ are two elements in the set.



You'll have to prove that $(x_3,y_3) = ((1-lambda)x_1+lambda x_2,(1-lambda)y_1+lambda y_2)$ also is an element of the set if $(x_1,y_1)$ and $(x_2,y_2)$ are elements of the set and $0<lambda<1$.




$B = { ... }$




This set could also be written as:



$B={(x,y)inmathbb R:x>0,y>0,(x,y)in A}$



(By the way: Is the notation "$mathbb R$" correct here or should it be "$mathbb R^2$"?)



In the first step you will already have proven that $(x_3,y_3)in A$ if $(x_1,y_1)in A land (x_2,y_2) in A$.



This means you only need to prove that $x_3>0$ and $y_3>0$ if $(x_1,y_1)in B land (x_2,y_2)in B$.



EDIT




It is not obvious what shall to do next




Unfortunately I don't know if I have the right answer here, either. I was thinking that your only problem is understanding the definition of the set.



However I would try to do the following:



The points $(0,1)$ and $(1,0)$ are elements of the set $A$. If the set is convex, the point $(frac{1}{2},frac{1}{2})$ is also an element of the set.



This means:



$(frac{1}{2})^p+(frac{1}{2})^pleq 1\
Rightarrow 2(frac{1}{2})^pleq 1\
Rightarrow 2leq 2^p$



This condition is obviously not true for $p<1$ so the set $A$ can only be convex for $pgeq 1$.



Proving this for the set $B$ will be harder because $(0,1)notin B$...



You may argue with the points $(1-2epsilon,2delta)$, $(2delta,1-2epsilon)$ and with limit calculation: If $delta$ and $epsilon$ are small enough...



To prove that $A$ is convex for all $pgeq 1$ I'd first define a modified variant of the set $B$:



$C={(x,y) : xgeq 0, ygeq 0, |x|^p+|y|^pleq 1}={(x,y) : xgeq 0, ygeq 0, x^p+y^pleq 1}$



The following inequations are true for every element in the set:



$x_1^p + y_1^p leq 1\
x_2^p + y_2^p leq 1$



And because $0leqlambdaleq 1$:



$lambda x_1^p + lambda y_1^p leq lambda\
(1-lambda)x_2^p + (1-lambda)y_2^p leq 1-lambda$



$Rightarrow lambda x_1^p + (1-lambda)x_2^p + lambda y_1^p + (1-lambda)y_2^p leq 1$



We can now have a look at the following function:



$f(x)=x^p, xin[0,infty), p>1\
f'(x)=px^{p-1}geq 0\
f''(x)=p(p-1)x^{p-2}geq 0$



When using the properties of convex and concave functions we see that:



$lambda f(x_1)+(1-lambda) f(x_2)geq f(lambda x_1+(1-lambda)x_2)$



(I don't know if you are allowed to use this in some university homework!)



For $f(x)=x$, which means $p=1$, this is also true.



This means:



$lambda x_1^p+(1-lambda) x_2^pgeq (lambda x_1+(1-lambda)x_2)^p$



Or:



$x_3^p+y_3^p = (lambda x_1 + (1-lambda)x_2)^p + (lambda y_1 + (1-lambda)y_2)^p \ leq lambda x_1^p + (1-lambda)x_2^p + lambda y_1^p + (1-lambda)y_2^p leq 1$



Therefore $(x_3,y_3)in C$.



Now we can also define another set:



$D={(x,y) : ygeq 0, |x|^p+|y|^pleq 1}={(x,y) : (x,y) in C lor (-x,y) in C}$



It should be easy to prove that this set is also convex; we have to distinguish three cases:




  • $x_1,x_2geq 0 Rightarrow (x_3,y_3)in C Rightarrow (x_3,y_3)in D$

  • $x_1,x_2leq 0 Rightarrow (-x_3,y_3)in C Rightarrow (x_3,y_3)in D$


  • $x_1$ and $x_2$ have different signs:

    This case is a bit more difficult; we first have to prove that the set contains an element $(0,y_0)$ "between" the points $(x_1,y_1)$ and $(x_2,y_2)$...


Now the set $A$ can be written as: $A={(x,y):(x,y)in Dlor (x,-y)in D}$.



The steps needed to prove that $A$ is convex when knowing that $D$ is convex are the same steps needed to prove that $D$ is convex when knowing that $C$ is convex.



EDIT 2



I just thought about the cases $pleq 0$:



My proof that $A$ is not convex unfortunately will not work for $pleq 0$; however you can easily show that $A$ cannot be convex for $p<0$ because $(x,y)in A Rightarrow (-x,-y)in A$ but $(0,0)notin A$.



However $B$ seems to be convex for $p<0$!






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    So for the first case that means that the following should be right: $|(1-lambda)x_1+lambda x_2|^p+|(1-lambda)y_1+lambda y_2|^p le 1$
    $endgroup$
    – nutcracker
    Dec 1 '18 at 9:11










  • $begingroup$
    It is not obvious what shall to do next :(
    $endgroup$
    – nutcracker
    Dec 1 '18 at 9:43












  • $begingroup$
    @Daniil I've made an edit...
    $endgroup$
    – Martin Rosenau
    Dec 1 '18 at 12:29










  • $begingroup$
    Thank you a lot! Amazing!!!
    $endgroup$
    – nutcracker
    Dec 1 '18 at 14:30










  • $begingroup$
    @Daniil Please see my second edit about the set $B$.
    $endgroup$
    – Martin Rosenau
    Dec 2 '18 at 18:00
















0












$begingroup$


$forall x,y in A rightarrow {z in A: z=(1-lambda)x+lambda y in A, lambda in [0,1] }$



I do not understand how the definition will look like applied to the condition of the set




Obviously your problem is understanding how the set is defined:



The set does not contain elements $x$ and $y$, but it cointas elements of the form $(x,y)$.



So $(x_1,y_1)$ and $(x_2,y_2)$ are two elements in the set.



You'll have to prove that $(x_3,y_3) = ((1-lambda)x_1+lambda x_2,(1-lambda)y_1+lambda y_2)$ also is an element of the set if $(x_1,y_1)$ and $(x_2,y_2)$ are elements of the set and $0<lambda<1$.




$B = { ... }$




This set could also be written as:



$B={(x,y)inmathbb R:x>0,y>0,(x,y)in A}$



(By the way: Is the notation "$mathbb R$" correct here or should it be "$mathbb R^2$"?)



In the first step you will already have proven that $(x_3,y_3)in A$ if $(x_1,y_1)in A land (x_2,y_2) in A$.



This means you only need to prove that $x_3>0$ and $y_3>0$ if $(x_1,y_1)in B land (x_2,y_2)in B$.



EDIT




It is not obvious what shall to do next




Unfortunately I don't know if I have the right answer here, either. I was thinking that your only problem is understanding the definition of the set.



However I would try to do the following:



The points $(0,1)$ and $(1,0)$ are elements of the set $A$. If the set is convex, the point $(frac{1}{2},frac{1}{2})$ is also an element of the set.



This means:



$(frac{1}{2})^p+(frac{1}{2})^pleq 1\
Rightarrow 2(frac{1}{2})^pleq 1\
Rightarrow 2leq 2^p$



This condition is obviously not true for $p<1$ so the set $A$ can only be convex for $pgeq 1$.



Proving this for the set $B$ will be harder because $(0,1)notin B$...



You may argue with the points $(1-2epsilon,2delta)$, $(2delta,1-2epsilon)$ and with limit calculation: If $delta$ and $epsilon$ are small enough...



To prove that $A$ is convex for all $pgeq 1$ I'd first define a modified variant of the set $B$:



$C={(x,y) : xgeq 0, ygeq 0, |x|^p+|y|^pleq 1}={(x,y) : xgeq 0, ygeq 0, x^p+y^pleq 1}$



The following inequations are true for every element in the set:



$x_1^p + y_1^p leq 1\
x_2^p + y_2^p leq 1$



And because $0leqlambdaleq 1$:



$lambda x_1^p + lambda y_1^p leq lambda\
(1-lambda)x_2^p + (1-lambda)y_2^p leq 1-lambda$



$Rightarrow lambda x_1^p + (1-lambda)x_2^p + lambda y_1^p + (1-lambda)y_2^p leq 1$



We can now have a look at the following function:



$f(x)=x^p, xin[0,infty), p>1\
f'(x)=px^{p-1}geq 0\
f''(x)=p(p-1)x^{p-2}geq 0$



When using the properties of convex and concave functions we see that:



$lambda f(x_1)+(1-lambda) f(x_2)geq f(lambda x_1+(1-lambda)x_2)$



(I don't know if you are allowed to use this in some university homework!)



For $f(x)=x$, which means $p=1$, this is also true.



This means:



$lambda x_1^p+(1-lambda) x_2^pgeq (lambda x_1+(1-lambda)x_2)^p$



Or:



$x_3^p+y_3^p = (lambda x_1 + (1-lambda)x_2)^p + (lambda y_1 + (1-lambda)y_2)^p \ leq lambda x_1^p + (1-lambda)x_2^p + lambda y_1^p + (1-lambda)y_2^p leq 1$



Therefore $(x_3,y_3)in C$.



Now we can also define another set:



$D={(x,y) : ygeq 0, |x|^p+|y|^pleq 1}={(x,y) : (x,y) in C lor (-x,y) in C}$



It should be easy to prove that this set is also convex; we have to distinguish three cases:




  • $x_1,x_2geq 0 Rightarrow (x_3,y_3)in C Rightarrow (x_3,y_3)in D$

  • $x_1,x_2leq 0 Rightarrow (-x_3,y_3)in C Rightarrow (x_3,y_3)in D$


  • $x_1$ and $x_2$ have different signs:

    This case is a bit more difficult; we first have to prove that the set contains an element $(0,y_0)$ "between" the points $(x_1,y_1)$ and $(x_2,y_2)$...


Now the set $A$ can be written as: $A={(x,y):(x,y)in Dlor (x,-y)in D}$.



The steps needed to prove that $A$ is convex when knowing that $D$ is convex are the same steps needed to prove that $D$ is convex when knowing that $C$ is convex.



EDIT 2



I just thought about the cases $pleq 0$:



My proof that $A$ is not convex unfortunately will not work for $pleq 0$; however you can easily show that $A$ cannot be convex for $p<0$ because $(x,y)in A Rightarrow (-x,-y)in A$ but $(0,0)notin A$.



However $B$ seems to be convex for $p<0$!






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    So for the first case that means that the following should be right: $|(1-lambda)x_1+lambda x_2|^p+|(1-lambda)y_1+lambda y_2|^p le 1$
    $endgroup$
    – nutcracker
    Dec 1 '18 at 9:11










  • $begingroup$
    It is not obvious what shall to do next :(
    $endgroup$
    – nutcracker
    Dec 1 '18 at 9:43












  • $begingroup$
    @Daniil I've made an edit...
    $endgroup$
    – Martin Rosenau
    Dec 1 '18 at 12:29










  • $begingroup$
    Thank you a lot! Amazing!!!
    $endgroup$
    – nutcracker
    Dec 1 '18 at 14:30










  • $begingroup$
    @Daniil Please see my second edit about the set $B$.
    $endgroup$
    – Martin Rosenau
    Dec 2 '18 at 18:00














0












0








0





$begingroup$


$forall x,y in A rightarrow {z in A: z=(1-lambda)x+lambda y in A, lambda in [0,1] }$



I do not understand how the definition will look like applied to the condition of the set




Obviously your problem is understanding how the set is defined:



The set does not contain elements $x$ and $y$, but it cointas elements of the form $(x,y)$.



So $(x_1,y_1)$ and $(x_2,y_2)$ are two elements in the set.



You'll have to prove that $(x_3,y_3) = ((1-lambda)x_1+lambda x_2,(1-lambda)y_1+lambda y_2)$ also is an element of the set if $(x_1,y_1)$ and $(x_2,y_2)$ are elements of the set and $0<lambda<1$.




$B = { ... }$




This set could also be written as:



$B={(x,y)inmathbb R:x>0,y>0,(x,y)in A}$



(By the way: Is the notation "$mathbb R$" correct here or should it be "$mathbb R^2$"?)



In the first step you will already have proven that $(x_3,y_3)in A$ if $(x_1,y_1)in A land (x_2,y_2) in A$.



This means you only need to prove that $x_3>0$ and $y_3>0$ if $(x_1,y_1)in B land (x_2,y_2)in B$.



EDIT




It is not obvious what shall to do next




Unfortunately I don't know if I have the right answer here, either. I was thinking that your only problem is understanding the definition of the set.



However I would try to do the following:



The points $(0,1)$ and $(1,0)$ are elements of the set $A$. If the set is convex, the point $(frac{1}{2},frac{1}{2})$ is also an element of the set.



This means:



$(frac{1}{2})^p+(frac{1}{2})^pleq 1\
Rightarrow 2(frac{1}{2})^pleq 1\
Rightarrow 2leq 2^p$



This condition is obviously not true for $p<1$ so the set $A$ can only be convex for $pgeq 1$.



Proving this for the set $B$ will be harder because $(0,1)notin B$...



You may argue with the points $(1-2epsilon,2delta)$, $(2delta,1-2epsilon)$ and with limit calculation: If $delta$ and $epsilon$ are small enough...



To prove that $A$ is convex for all $pgeq 1$ I'd first define a modified variant of the set $B$:



$C={(x,y) : xgeq 0, ygeq 0, |x|^p+|y|^pleq 1}={(x,y) : xgeq 0, ygeq 0, x^p+y^pleq 1}$



The following inequations are true for every element in the set:



$x_1^p + y_1^p leq 1\
x_2^p + y_2^p leq 1$



And because $0leqlambdaleq 1$:



$lambda x_1^p + lambda y_1^p leq lambda\
(1-lambda)x_2^p + (1-lambda)y_2^p leq 1-lambda$



$Rightarrow lambda x_1^p + (1-lambda)x_2^p + lambda y_1^p + (1-lambda)y_2^p leq 1$



We can now have a look at the following function:



$f(x)=x^p, xin[0,infty), p>1\
f'(x)=px^{p-1}geq 0\
f''(x)=p(p-1)x^{p-2}geq 0$



When using the properties of convex and concave functions we see that:



$lambda f(x_1)+(1-lambda) f(x_2)geq f(lambda x_1+(1-lambda)x_2)$



(I don't know if you are allowed to use this in some university homework!)



For $f(x)=x$, which means $p=1$, this is also true.



This means:



$lambda x_1^p+(1-lambda) x_2^pgeq (lambda x_1+(1-lambda)x_2)^p$



Or:



$x_3^p+y_3^p = (lambda x_1 + (1-lambda)x_2)^p + (lambda y_1 + (1-lambda)y_2)^p \ leq lambda x_1^p + (1-lambda)x_2^p + lambda y_1^p + (1-lambda)y_2^p leq 1$



Therefore $(x_3,y_3)in C$.



Now we can also define another set:



$D={(x,y) : ygeq 0, |x|^p+|y|^pleq 1}={(x,y) : (x,y) in C lor (-x,y) in C}$



It should be easy to prove that this set is also convex; we have to distinguish three cases:




  • $x_1,x_2geq 0 Rightarrow (x_3,y_3)in C Rightarrow (x_3,y_3)in D$

  • $x_1,x_2leq 0 Rightarrow (-x_3,y_3)in C Rightarrow (x_3,y_3)in D$


  • $x_1$ and $x_2$ have different signs:

    This case is a bit more difficult; we first have to prove that the set contains an element $(0,y_0)$ "between" the points $(x_1,y_1)$ and $(x_2,y_2)$...


Now the set $A$ can be written as: $A={(x,y):(x,y)in Dlor (x,-y)in D}$.



The steps needed to prove that $A$ is convex when knowing that $D$ is convex are the same steps needed to prove that $D$ is convex when knowing that $C$ is convex.



EDIT 2



I just thought about the cases $pleq 0$:



My proof that $A$ is not convex unfortunately will not work for $pleq 0$; however you can easily show that $A$ cannot be convex for $p<0$ because $(x,y)in A Rightarrow (-x,-y)in A$ but $(0,0)notin A$.



However $B$ seems to be convex for $p<0$!






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$




$forall x,y in A rightarrow {z in A: z=(1-lambda)x+lambda y in A, lambda in [0,1] }$



I do not understand how the definition will look like applied to the condition of the set




Obviously your problem is understanding how the set is defined:



The set does not contain elements $x$ and $y$, but it cointas elements of the form $(x,y)$.



So $(x_1,y_1)$ and $(x_2,y_2)$ are two elements in the set.



You'll have to prove that $(x_3,y_3) = ((1-lambda)x_1+lambda x_2,(1-lambda)y_1+lambda y_2)$ also is an element of the set if $(x_1,y_1)$ and $(x_2,y_2)$ are elements of the set and $0<lambda<1$.




$B = { ... }$




This set could also be written as:



$B={(x,y)inmathbb R:x>0,y>0,(x,y)in A}$



(By the way: Is the notation "$mathbb R$" correct here or should it be "$mathbb R^2$"?)



In the first step you will already have proven that $(x_3,y_3)in A$ if $(x_1,y_1)in A land (x_2,y_2) in A$.



This means you only need to prove that $x_3>0$ and $y_3>0$ if $(x_1,y_1)in B land (x_2,y_2)in B$.



EDIT




It is not obvious what shall to do next




Unfortunately I don't know if I have the right answer here, either. I was thinking that your only problem is understanding the definition of the set.



However I would try to do the following:



The points $(0,1)$ and $(1,0)$ are elements of the set $A$. If the set is convex, the point $(frac{1}{2},frac{1}{2})$ is also an element of the set.



This means:



$(frac{1}{2})^p+(frac{1}{2})^pleq 1\
Rightarrow 2(frac{1}{2})^pleq 1\
Rightarrow 2leq 2^p$



This condition is obviously not true for $p<1$ so the set $A$ can only be convex for $pgeq 1$.



Proving this for the set $B$ will be harder because $(0,1)notin B$...



You may argue with the points $(1-2epsilon,2delta)$, $(2delta,1-2epsilon)$ and with limit calculation: If $delta$ and $epsilon$ are small enough...



To prove that $A$ is convex for all $pgeq 1$ I'd first define a modified variant of the set $B$:



$C={(x,y) : xgeq 0, ygeq 0, |x|^p+|y|^pleq 1}={(x,y) : xgeq 0, ygeq 0, x^p+y^pleq 1}$



The following inequations are true for every element in the set:



$x_1^p + y_1^p leq 1\
x_2^p + y_2^p leq 1$



And because $0leqlambdaleq 1$:



$lambda x_1^p + lambda y_1^p leq lambda\
(1-lambda)x_2^p + (1-lambda)y_2^p leq 1-lambda$



$Rightarrow lambda x_1^p + (1-lambda)x_2^p + lambda y_1^p + (1-lambda)y_2^p leq 1$



We can now have a look at the following function:



$f(x)=x^p, xin[0,infty), p>1\
f'(x)=px^{p-1}geq 0\
f''(x)=p(p-1)x^{p-2}geq 0$



When using the properties of convex and concave functions we see that:



$lambda f(x_1)+(1-lambda) f(x_2)geq f(lambda x_1+(1-lambda)x_2)$



(I don't know if you are allowed to use this in some university homework!)



For $f(x)=x$, which means $p=1$, this is also true.



This means:



$lambda x_1^p+(1-lambda) x_2^pgeq (lambda x_1+(1-lambda)x_2)^p$



Or:



$x_3^p+y_3^p = (lambda x_1 + (1-lambda)x_2)^p + (lambda y_1 + (1-lambda)y_2)^p \ leq lambda x_1^p + (1-lambda)x_2^p + lambda y_1^p + (1-lambda)y_2^p leq 1$



Therefore $(x_3,y_3)in C$.



Now we can also define another set:



$D={(x,y) : ygeq 0, |x|^p+|y|^pleq 1}={(x,y) : (x,y) in C lor (-x,y) in C}$



It should be easy to prove that this set is also convex; we have to distinguish three cases:




  • $x_1,x_2geq 0 Rightarrow (x_3,y_3)in C Rightarrow (x_3,y_3)in D$

  • $x_1,x_2leq 0 Rightarrow (-x_3,y_3)in C Rightarrow (x_3,y_3)in D$


  • $x_1$ and $x_2$ have different signs:

    This case is a bit more difficult; we first have to prove that the set contains an element $(0,y_0)$ "between" the points $(x_1,y_1)$ and $(x_2,y_2)$...


Now the set $A$ can be written as: $A={(x,y):(x,y)in Dlor (x,-y)in D}$.



The steps needed to prove that $A$ is convex when knowing that $D$ is convex are the same steps needed to prove that $D$ is convex when knowing that $C$ is convex.



EDIT 2



I just thought about the cases $pleq 0$:



My proof that $A$ is not convex unfortunately will not work for $pleq 0$; however you can easily show that $A$ cannot be convex for $p<0$ because $(x,y)in A Rightarrow (-x,-y)in A$ but $(0,0)notin A$.



However $B$ seems to be convex for $p<0$!







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Dec 2 '18 at 18:00

























answered Dec 1 '18 at 9:03









Martin RosenauMartin Rosenau

1,156139




1,156139












  • $begingroup$
    So for the first case that means that the following should be right: $|(1-lambda)x_1+lambda x_2|^p+|(1-lambda)y_1+lambda y_2|^p le 1$
    $endgroup$
    – nutcracker
    Dec 1 '18 at 9:11










  • $begingroup$
    It is not obvious what shall to do next :(
    $endgroup$
    – nutcracker
    Dec 1 '18 at 9:43












  • $begingroup$
    @Daniil I've made an edit...
    $endgroup$
    – Martin Rosenau
    Dec 1 '18 at 12:29










  • $begingroup$
    Thank you a lot! Amazing!!!
    $endgroup$
    – nutcracker
    Dec 1 '18 at 14:30










  • $begingroup$
    @Daniil Please see my second edit about the set $B$.
    $endgroup$
    – Martin Rosenau
    Dec 2 '18 at 18:00


















  • $begingroup$
    So for the first case that means that the following should be right: $|(1-lambda)x_1+lambda x_2|^p+|(1-lambda)y_1+lambda y_2|^p le 1$
    $endgroup$
    – nutcracker
    Dec 1 '18 at 9:11










  • $begingroup$
    It is not obvious what shall to do next :(
    $endgroup$
    – nutcracker
    Dec 1 '18 at 9:43












  • $begingroup$
    @Daniil I've made an edit...
    $endgroup$
    – Martin Rosenau
    Dec 1 '18 at 12:29










  • $begingroup$
    Thank you a lot! Amazing!!!
    $endgroup$
    – nutcracker
    Dec 1 '18 at 14:30










  • $begingroup$
    @Daniil Please see my second edit about the set $B$.
    $endgroup$
    – Martin Rosenau
    Dec 2 '18 at 18:00
















$begingroup$
So for the first case that means that the following should be right: $|(1-lambda)x_1+lambda x_2|^p+|(1-lambda)y_1+lambda y_2|^p le 1$
$endgroup$
– nutcracker
Dec 1 '18 at 9:11




$begingroup$
So for the first case that means that the following should be right: $|(1-lambda)x_1+lambda x_2|^p+|(1-lambda)y_1+lambda y_2|^p le 1$
$endgroup$
– nutcracker
Dec 1 '18 at 9:11












$begingroup$
It is not obvious what shall to do next :(
$endgroup$
– nutcracker
Dec 1 '18 at 9:43






$begingroup$
It is not obvious what shall to do next :(
$endgroup$
– nutcracker
Dec 1 '18 at 9:43














$begingroup$
@Daniil I've made an edit...
$endgroup$
– Martin Rosenau
Dec 1 '18 at 12:29




$begingroup$
@Daniil I've made an edit...
$endgroup$
– Martin Rosenau
Dec 1 '18 at 12:29












$begingroup$
Thank you a lot! Amazing!!!
$endgroup$
– nutcracker
Dec 1 '18 at 14:30




$begingroup$
Thank you a lot! Amazing!!!
$endgroup$
– nutcracker
Dec 1 '18 at 14:30












$begingroup$
@Daniil Please see my second edit about the set $B$.
$endgroup$
– Martin Rosenau
Dec 2 '18 at 18:00




$begingroup$
@Daniil Please see my second edit about the set $B$.
$endgroup$
– Martin Rosenau
Dec 2 '18 at 18:00



Popular posts from this blog

Ellipse (mathématiques)

Quarter-circle Tiles

Mont Emei