Attaching $2$-dimensional cell to $D^2$ gives the space $S^2/(xsim -x)$












5












$begingroup$


I am studying Algebraic Topology, and right now I am going through cell-attachment, which I have a pretty hard time to grasp. An "example" they give in the book is:





Example:



Define $X$ to be the space obtained from $S^2$ by identifying antipodal points on the equator, then it is easy to see that $X$ can be obtained by attaching a $2$-dimensional cell to $D^2$.





I suppose this should be easy, but it isn't for me, so I would be really happy if someone could help me through this example and how to define the map. Since I don't even know where (and how) to start.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    5












    $begingroup$


    I am studying Algebraic Topology, and right now I am going through cell-attachment, which I have a pretty hard time to grasp. An "example" they give in the book is:





    Example:



    Define $X$ to be the space obtained from $S^2$ by identifying antipodal points on the equator, then it is easy to see that $X$ can be obtained by attaching a $2$-dimensional cell to $D^2$.





    I suppose this should be easy, but it isn't for me, so I would be really happy if someone could help me through this example and how to define the map. Since I don't even know where (and how) to start.










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      5












      5








      5


      2



      $begingroup$


      I am studying Algebraic Topology, and right now I am going through cell-attachment, which I have a pretty hard time to grasp. An "example" they give in the book is:





      Example:



      Define $X$ to be the space obtained from $S^2$ by identifying antipodal points on the equator, then it is easy to see that $X$ can be obtained by attaching a $2$-dimensional cell to $D^2$.





      I suppose this should be easy, but it isn't for me, so I would be really happy if someone could help me through this example and how to define the map. Since I don't even know where (and how) to start.










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      I am studying Algebraic Topology, and right now I am going through cell-attachment, which I have a pretty hard time to grasp. An "example" they give in the book is:





      Example:



      Define $X$ to be the space obtained from $S^2$ by identifying antipodal points on the equator, then it is easy to see that $X$ can be obtained by attaching a $2$-dimensional cell to $D^2$.





      I suppose this should be easy, but it isn't for me, so I would be really happy if someone could help me through this example and how to define the map. Since I don't even know where (and how) to start.







      general-topology algebraic-topology cw-complexes






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Dec 10 '17 at 0:01







      user511893





























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0












          $begingroup$

          Take $D^2$ and let the attaching map be $e:partial D^2 to partial D^2$ be the quotient map, as in $z mapsto z^2 $ as complex numbers.



          Also note that if the attaching map were identity, we would just recover $S^2$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            when you attach a cell, you attach its boundary.
            $endgroup$
            – Tsemo Aristide
            Dec 10 '17 at 0:28










          • $begingroup$
            @TsemoAristide my apologies, i both misread the question and said something silly.
            $endgroup$
            – Andres Mejia
            Dec 10 '17 at 0:37










          • $begingroup$
            Thank you for your answer Andres. This looks like an answer I am happy with. :) Anyhow, I will have to take a closer look at this tomorrow (and maybe also have some questions by then) since it's in the middle of the night here and I am starting to become... tired. ;)
            $endgroup$
            – user511893
            Dec 10 '17 at 0:45










          • $begingroup$
            @AndresMejia Probably a silly question, but why do you choose to map $-x$ to $x$ and not $x$ to $-x$? :)
            $endgroup$
            – user511893
            Dec 10 '17 at 10:13










          • $begingroup$
            Dear Andres, yes that's quite okay with me and I have deleted my now irrelevant previous comment.
            $endgroup$
            – Georges Elencwajg
            Dec 31 '18 at 18:50













          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2559302%2fattaching-2-dimensional-cell-to-d2-gives-the-space-s2-x-sim-x%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown
























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          0












          $begingroup$

          Take $D^2$ and let the attaching map be $e:partial D^2 to partial D^2$ be the quotient map, as in $z mapsto z^2 $ as complex numbers.



          Also note that if the attaching map were identity, we would just recover $S^2$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            when you attach a cell, you attach its boundary.
            $endgroup$
            – Tsemo Aristide
            Dec 10 '17 at 0:28










          • $begingroup$
            @TsemoAristide my apologies, i both misread the question and said something silly.
            $endgroup$
            – Andres Mejia
            Dec 10 '17 at 0:37










          • $begingroup$
            Thank you for your answer Andres. This looks like an answer I am happy with. :) Anyhow, I will have to take a closer look at this tomorrow (and maybe also have some questions by then) since it's in the middle of the night here and I am starting to become... tired. ;)
            $endgroup$
            – user511893
            Dec 10 '17 at 0:45










          • $begingroup$
            @AndresMejia Probably a silly question, but why do you choose to map $-x$ to $x$ and not $x$ to $-x$? :)
            $endgroup$
            – user511893
            Dec 10 '17 at 10:13










          • $begingroup$
            Dear Andres, yes that's quite okay with me and I have deleted my now irrelevant previous comment.
            $endgroup$
            – Georges Elencwajg
            Dec 31 '18 at 18:50


















          0












          $begingroup$

          Take $D^2$ and let the attaching map be $e:partial D^2 to partial D^2$ be the quotient map, as in $z mapsto z^2 $ as complex numbers.



          Also note that if the attaching map were identity, we would just recover $S^2$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            when you attach a cell, you attach its boundary.
            $endgroup$
            – Tsemo Aristide
            Dec 10 '17 at 0:28










          • $begingroup$
            @TsemoAristide my apologies, i both misread the question and said something silly.
            $endgroup$
            – Andres Mejia
            Dec 10 '17 at 0:37










          • $begingroup$
            Thank you for your answer Andres. This looks like an answer I am happy with. :) Anyhow, I will have to take a closer look at this tomorrow (and maybe also have some questions by then) since it's in the middle of the night here and I am starting to become... tired. ;)
            $endgroup$
            – user511893
            Dec 10 '17 at 0:45










          • $begingroup$
            @AndresMejia Probably a silly question, but why do you choose to map $-x$ to $x$ and not $x$ to $-x$? :)
            $endgroup$
            – user511893
            Dec 10 '17 at 10:13










          • $begingroup$
            Dear Andres, yes that's quite okay with me and I have deleted my now irrelevant previous comment.
            $endgroup$
            – Georges Elencwajg
            Dec 31 '18 at 18:50
















          0












          0








          0





          $begingroup$

          Take $D^2$ and let the attaching map be $e:partial D^2 to partial D^2$ be the quotient map, as in $z mapsto z^2 $ as complex numbers.



          Also note that if the attaching map were identity, we would just recover $S^2$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          Take $D^2$ and let the attaching map be $e:partial D^2 to partial D^2$ be the quotient map, as in $z mapsto z^2 $ as complex numbers.



          Also note that if the attaching map were identity, we would just recover $S^2$.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Dec 31 '18 at 18:20

























          answered Dec 10 '17 at 0:21









          Andres MejiaAndres Mejia

          16.2k21548




          16.2k21548












          • $begingroup$
            when you attach a cell, you attach its boundary.
            $endgroup$
            – Tsemo Aristide
            Dec 10 '17 at 0:28










          • $begingroup$
            @TsemoAristide my apologies, i both misread the question and said something silly.
            $endgroup$
            – Andres Mejia
            Dec 10 '17 at 0:37










          • $begingroup$
            Thank you for your answer Andres. This looks like an answer I am happy with. :) Anyhow, I will have to take a closer look at this tomorrow (and maybe also have some questions by then) since it's in the middle of the night here and I am starting to become... tired. ;)
            $endgroup$
            – user511893
            Dec 10 '17 at 0:45










          • $begingroup$
            @AndresMejia Probably a silly question, but why do you choose to map $-x$ to $x$ and not $x$ to $-x$? :)
            $endgroup$
            – user511893
            Dec 10 '17 at 10:13










          • $begingroup$
            Dear Andres, yes that's quite okay with me and I have deleted my now irrelevant previous comment.
            $endgroup$
            – Georges Elencwajg
            Dec 31 '18 at 18:50




















          • $begingroup$
            when you attach a cell, you attach its boundary.
            $endgroup$
            – Tsemo Aristide
            Dec 10 '17 at 0:28










          • $begingroup$
            @TsemoAristide my apologies, i both misread the question and said something silly.
            $endgroup$
            – Andres Mejia
            Dec 10 '17 at 0:37










          • $begingroup$
            Thank you for your answer Andres. This looks like an answer I am happy with. :) Anyhow, I will have to take a closer look at this tomorrow (and maybe also have some questions by then) since it's in the middle of the night here and I am starting to become... tired. ;)
            $endgroup$
            – user511893
            Dec 10 '17 at 0:45










          • $begingroup$
            @AndresMejia Probably a silly question, but why do you choose to map $-x$ to $x$ and not $x$ to $-x$? :)
            $endgroup$
            – user511893
            Dec 10 '17 at 10:13










          • $begingroup$
            Dear Andres, yes that's quite okay with me and I have deleted my now irrelevant previous comment.
            $endgroup$
            – Georges Elencwajg
            Dec 31 '18 at 18:50


















          $begingroup$
          when you attach a cell, you attach its boundary.
          $endgroup$
          – Tsemo Aristide
          Dec 10 '17 at 0:28




          $begingroup$
          when you attach a cell, you attach its boundary.
          $endgroup$
          – Tsemo Aristide
          Dec 10 '17 at 0:28












          $begingroup$
          @TsemoAristide my apologies, i both misread the question and said something silly.
          $endgroup$
          – Andres Mejia
          Dec 10 '17 at 0:37




          $begingroup$
          @TsemoAristide my apologies, i both misread the question and said something silly.
          $endgroup$
          – Andres Mejia
          Dec 10 '17 at 0:37












          $begingroup$
          Thank you for your answer Andres. This looks like an answer I am happy with. :) Anyhow, I will have to take a closer look at this tomorrow (and maybe also have some questions by then) since it's in the middle of the night here and I am starting to become... tired. ;)
          $endgroup$
          – user511893
          Dec 10 '17 at 0:45




          $begingroup$
          Thank you for your answer Andres. This looks like an answer I am happy with. :) Anyhow, I will have to take a closer look at this tomorrow (and maybe also have some questions by then) since it's in the middle of the night here and I am starting to become... tired. ;)
          $endgroup$
          – user511893
          Dec 10 '17 at 0:45












          $begingroup$
          @AndresMejia Probably a silly question, but why do you choose to map $-x$ to $x$ and not $x$ to $-x$? :)
          $endgroup$
          – user511893
          Dec 10 '17 at 10:13




          $begingroup$
          @AndresMejia Probably a silly question, but why do you choose to map $-x$ to $x$ and not $x$ to $-x$? :)
          $endgroup$
          – user511893
          Dec 10 '17 at 10:13












          $begingroup$
          Dear Andres, yes that's quite okay with me and I have deleted my now irrelevant previous comment.
          $endgroup$
          – Georges Elencwajg
          Dec 31 '18 at 18:50






          $begingroup$
          Dear Andres, yes that's quite okay with me and I have deleted my now irrelevant previous comment.
          $endgroup$
          – Georges Elencwajg
          Dec 31 '18 at 18:50




















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2559302%2fattaching-2-dimensional-cell-to-d2-gives-the-space-s2-x-sim-x%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Quarter-circle Tiles

          build a pushdown automaton that recognizes the reverse language of a given pushdown automaton?

          Mont Emei