Posterior Model Odds using Monte Carlo Integration












1












$begingroup$


I have a model $M_1$ with three parameters and a model $M_2$ with two parameters and data $y_t$. I want to compute the quantity $$frac{p(M_1|y)}{p(M_2|y)}= frac{p(y|M_1)}{p(y|M_2)}$$ for equal priors $p(M_1)=p(M_2)=1/2$. The numerator for example can be written as $$int int int p(y| mu, omega, rho, M_1) p( mu|M_1 ) p( omega | M_1 ) p( rho M_1) d mu d omega drho$$ or as $$ int int int p(y| mu, omega, rho, M_1) p(mu, omega ,rho |M_1) d mu domega drho$$ if we assume independent priors. The full conditionals are easily computed but I think that it is impossible to simulate using Gibbs algorithm from the posterior distribution of the parameters and take the mean on the likelihood for two reasons. The one is that the right posterior must be conditioned on my data as well so $ p( mu|M_1 ) p( omega | M_1 ) p( rho M_1)$ is more likely the prior. But if I simulated from the priors I think that it would be wrong again as the likelihood is a function of y here and parameters are considered given for the likelihood so I can't use my data. Am I right ? So this is a more difficult problem than I think?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    1












    $begingroup$


    I have a model $M_1$ with three parameters and a model $M_2$ with two parameters and data $y_t$. I want to compute the quantity $$frac{p(M_1|y)}{p(M_2|y)}= frac{p(y|M_1)}{p(y|M_2)}$$ for equal priors $p(M_1)=p(M_2)=1/2$. The numerator for example can be written as $$int int int p(y| mu, omega, rho, M_1) p( mu|M_1 ) p( omega | M_1 ) p( rho M_1) d mu d omega drho$$ or as $$ int int int p(y| mu, omega, rho, M_1) p(mu, omega ,rho |M_1) d mu domega drho$$ if we assume independent priors. The full conditionals are easily computed but I think that it is impossible to simulate using Gibbs algorithm from the posterior distribution of the parameters and take the mean on the likelihood for two reasons. The one is that the right posterior must be conditioned on my data as well so $ p( mu|M_1 ) p( omega | M_1 ) p( rho M_1)$ is more likely the prior. But if I simulated from the priors I think that it would be wrong again as the likelihood is a function of y here and parameters are considered given for the likelihood so I can't use my data. Am I right ? So this is a more difficult problem than I think?










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      1












      1








      1





      $begingroup$


      I have a model $M_1$ with three parameters and a model $M_2$ with two parameters and data $y_t$. I want to compute the quantity $$frac{p(M_1|y)}{p(M_2|y)}= frac{p(y|M_1)}{p(y|M_2)}$$ for equal priors $p(M_1)=p(M_2)=1/2$. The numerator for example can be written as $$int int int p(y| mu, omega, rho, M_1) p( mu|M_1 ) p( omega | M_1 ) p( rho M_1) d mu d omega drho$$ or as $$ int int int p(y| mu, omega, rho, M_1) p(mu, omega ,rho |M_1) d mu domega drho$$ if we assume independent priors. The full conditionals are easily computed but I think that it is impossible to simulate using Gibbs algorithm from the posterior distribution of the parameters and take the mean on the likelihood for two reasons. The one is that the right posterior must be conditioned on my data as well so $ p( mu|M_1 ) p( omega | M_1 ) p( rho M_1)$ is more likely the prior. But if I simulated from the priors I think that it would be wrong again as the likelihood is a function of y here and parameters are considered given for the likelihood so I can't use my data. Am I right ? So this is a more difficult problem than I think?










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      I have a model $M_1$ with three parameters and a model $M_2$ with two parameters and data $y_t$. I want to compute the quantity $$frac{p(M_1|y)}{p(M_2|y)}= frac{p(y|M_1)}{p(y|M_2)}$$ for equal priors $p(M_1)=p(M_2)=1/2$. The numerator for example can be written as $$int int int p(y| mu, omega, rho, M_1) p( mu|M_1 ) p( omega | M_1 ) p( rho M_1) d mu d omega drho$$ or as $$ int int int p(y| mu, omega, rho, M_1) p(mu, omega ,rho |M_1) d mu domega drho$$ if we assume independent priors. The full conditionals are easily computed but I think that it is impossible to simulate using Gibbs algorithm from the posterior distribution of the parameters and take the mean on the likelihood for two reasons. The one is that the right posterior must be conditioned on my data as well so $ p( mu|M_1 ) p( omega | M_1 ) p( rho M_1)$ is more likely the prior. But if I simulated from the priors I think that it would be wrong again as the likelihood is a function of y here and parameters are considered given for the likelihood so I can't use my data. Am I right ? So this is a more difficult problem than I think?







      bayesian






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Dec 31 '18 at 17:59









      Manos LouManos Lou

      62




      62






















          0






          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3057910%2fposterior-model-odds-using-monte-carlo-integration%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          0






          active

          oldest

          votes








          0






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes
















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3057910%2fposterior-model-odds-using-monte-carlo-integration%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Quarter-circle Tiles

          build a pushdown automaton that recognizes the reverse language of a given pushdown automaton?

          Mont Emei