Hamilton Paths in Complete graph $K_n$












0












$begingroup$


In complete graph $K_n$, is it true that we can have at least $2*n$ Hamilton paths?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$


    In complete graph $K_n$, is it true that we can have at least $2*n$ Hamilton paths?










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      In complete graph $K_n$, is it true that we can have at least $2*n$ Hamilton paths?










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      In complete graph $K_n$, is it true that we can have at least $2*n$ Hamilton paths?







      graph-theory algorithms hamiltonian-path






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Dec 18 '18 at 22:01









      JuneJune

      122




      122






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          Since in a complete graph $K_n$ each two vertices are adjacent, the set of Hamiltonian paths of $K_n$ is exactly a set $S_n$ of permutations of its vertices. But $|S_n|=n!$, which is at least $2n$ when $nge 3$, but it is less than $2n$ for $nle 2$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            I know it’s stupid, but you have to divide by two since the reverse of a permutation gives the same Hamiltonian path.
            $endgroup$
            – Bob Krueger
            Dec 19 '18 at 8:50










          • $begingroup$
            @BobKrueger I was aware of this point, so I have checked it (in “Chromatic Graph Theory” by Chartrand and Zhang). A path is defined as a sequence of vertices such that... . So, for instance, since the sequences $(1,2,3)$ and $(3,2,1)$ are distinct, these paths are distinct too.
            $endgroup$
            – Alex Ravsky
            Dec 21 '18 at 7:02






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Fair enough. Then with that, the OP can prove their claim for any graph with a Hamiltonian cycle.
            $endgroup$
            – Bob Krueger
            Dec 21 '18 at 9:05











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3045766%2fhamilton-paths-in-complete-graph-k-n%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          1












          $begingroup$

          Since in a complete graph $K_n$ each two vertices are adjacent, the set of Hamiltonian paths of $K_n$ is exactly a set $S_n$ of permutations of its vertices. But $|S_n|=n!$, which is at least $2n$ when $nge 3$, but it is less than $2n$ for $nle 2$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            I know it’s stupid, but you have to divide by two since the reverse of a permutation gives the same Hamiltonian path.
            $endgroup$
            – Bob Krueger
            Dec 19 '18 at 8:50










          • $begingroup$
            @BobKrueger I was aware of this point, so I have checked it (in “Chromatic Graph Theory” by Chartrand and Zhang). A path is defined as a sequence of vertices such that... . So, for instance, since the sequences $(1,2,3)$ and $(3,2,1)$ are distinct, these paths are distinct too.
            $endgroup$
            – Alex Ravsky
            Dec 21 '18 at 7:02






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Fair enough. Then with that, the OP can prove their claim for any graph with a Hamiltonian cycle.
            $endgroup$
            – Bob Krueger
            Dec 21 '18 at 9:05
















          1












          $begingroup$

          Since in a complete graph $K_n$ each two vertices are adjacent, the set of Hamiltonian paths of $K_n$ is exactly a set $S_n$ of permutations of its vertices. But $|S_n|=n!$, which is at least $2n$ when $nge 3$, but it is less than $2n$ for $nle 2$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            I know it’s stupid, but you have to divide by two since the reverse of a permutation gives the same Hamiltonian path.
            $endgroup$
            – Bob Krueger
            Dec 19 '18 at 8:50










          • $begingroup$
            @BobKrueger I was aware of this point, so I have checked it (in “Chromatic Graph Theory” by Chartrand and Zhang). A path is defined as a sequence of vertices such that... . So, for instance, since the sequences $(1,2,3)$ and $(3,2,1)$ are distinct, these paths are distinct too.
            $endgroup$
            – Alex Ravsky
            Dec 21 '18 at 7:02






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Fair enough. Then with that, the OP can prove their claim for any graph with a Hamiltonian cycle.
            $endgroup$
            – Bob Krueger
            Dec 21 '18 at 9:05














          1












          1








          1





          $begingroup$

          Since in a complete graph $K_n$ each two vertices are adjacent, the set of Hamiltonian paths of $K_n$ is exactly a set $S_n$ of permutations of its vertices. But $|S_n|=n!$, which is at least $2n$ when $nge 3$, but it is less than $2n$ for $nle 2$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          Since in a complete graph $K_n$ each two vertices are adjacent, the set of Hamiltonian paths of $K_n$ is exactly a set $S_n$ of permutations of its vertices. But $|S_n|=n!$, which is at least $2n$ when $nge 3$, but it is less than $2n$ for $nle 2$.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Dec 19 '18 at 6:45









          Alex RavskyAlex Ravsky

          41.4k32282




          41.4k32282












          • $begingroup$
            I know it’s stupid, but you have to divide by two since the reverse of a permutation gives the same Hamiltonian path.
            $endgroup$
            – Bob Krueger
            Dec 19 '18 at 8:50










          • $begingroup$
            @BobKrueger I was aware of this point, so I have checked it (in “Chromatic Graph Theory” by Chartrand and Zhang). A path is defined as a sequence of vertices such that... . So, for instance, since the sequences $(1,2,3)$ and $(3,2,1)$ are distinct, these paths are distinct too.
            $endgroup$
            – Alex Ravsky
            Dec 21 '18 at 7:02






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Fair enough. Then with that, the OP can prove their claim for any graph with a Hamiltonian cycle.
            $endgroup$
            – Bob Krueger
            Dec 21 '18 at 9:05


















          • $begingroup$
            I know it’s stupid, but you have to divide by two since the reverse of a permutation gives the same Hamiltonian path.
            $endgroup$
            – Bob Krueger
            Dec 19 '18 at 8:50










          • $begingroup$
            @BobKrueger I was aware of this point, so I have checked it (in “Chromatic Graph Theory” by Chartrand and Zhang). A path is defined as a sequence of vertices such that... . So, for instance, since the sequences $(1,2,3)$ and $(3,2,1)$ are distinct, these paths are distinct too.
            $endgroup$
            – Alex Ravsky
            Dec 21 '18 at 7:02






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Fair enough. Then with that, the OP can prove their claim for any graph with a Hamiltonian cycle.
            $endgroup$
            – Bob Krueger
            Dec 21 '18 at 9:05
















          $begingroup$
          I know it’s stupid, but you have to divide by two since the reverse of a permutation gives the same Hamiltonian path.
          $endgroup$
          – Bob Krueger
          Dec 19 '18 at 8:50




          $begingroup$
          I know it’s stupid, but you have to divide by two since the reverse of a permutation gives the same Hamiltonian path.
          $endgroup$
          – Bob Krueger
          Dec 19 '18 at 8:50












          $begingroup$
          @BobKrueger I was aware of this point, so I have checked it (in “Chromatic Graph Theory” by Chartrand and Zhang). A path is defined as a sequence of vertices such that... . So, for instance, since the sequences $(1,2,3)$ and $(3,2,1)$ are distinct, these paths are distinct too.
          $endgroup$
          – Alex Ravsky
          Dec 21 '18 at 7:02




          $begingroup$
          @BobKrueger I was aware of this point, so I have checked it (in “Chromatic Graph Theory” by Chartrand and Zhang). A path is defined as a sequence of vertices such that... . So, for instance, since the sequences $(1,2,3)$ and $(3,2,1)$ are distinct, these paths are distinct too.
          $endgroup$
          – Alex Ravsky
          Dec 21 '18 at 7:02




          1




          1




          $begingroup$
          Fair enough. Then with that, the OP can prove their claim for any graph with a Hamiltonian cycle.
          $endgroup$
          – Bob Krueger
          Dec 21 '18 at 9:05




          $begingroup$
          Fair enough. Then with that, the OP can prove their claim for any graph with a Hamiltonian cycle.
          $endgroup$
          – Bob Krueger
          Dec 21 '18 at 9:05


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3045766%2fhamilton-paths-in-complete-graph-k-n%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Quarter-circle Tiles

          build a pushdown automaton that recognizes the reverse language of a given pushdown automaton?

          Mont Emei