On morphisms in an abelian category
$begingroup$
$underline {Background}$: Suppose ,we are in an abelian category $mathcal C$ and let $B in mathcal C$ be an object.
Let,$f_1,f_2 in Hom(B,B)$.
Since $mathcal C$ is an abelian category $f_1-f_2 in Hom(B,B)$.
$underline {Question(1)}$:what is the image of $f_1-f_2$?
i.e can we calculate this image in general in terms of kernel ,cokernel ,image of the morphisms $f_1$,$f_2$?
$underline { Guess}$: may be under some suitable condition it could be $Im(f_1)/Im(f_2)$ (the only natural thing that comes to my mind is this even though I do not see why Im$f_2$ should be embedded in Im$f_1$).But I do not see any clue how to proceed further.
$underline {Question (2)}$: even if we cannot represent it generally in terms of kernel,cokernel and image of $f_1,f_2 $ how to think of this image category theoretically,i.e diagrammatically.
Any help from anyone is welcome.
category-theory abelian-categories
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$underline {Background}$: Suppose ,we are in an abelian category $mathcal C$ and let $B in mathcal C$ be an object.
Let,$f_1,f_2 in Hom(B,B)$.
Since $mathcal C$ is an abelian category $f_1-f_2 in Hom(B,B)$.
$underline {Question(1)}$:what is the image of $f_1-f_2$?
i.e can we calculate this image in general in terms of kernel ,cokernel ,image of the morphisms $f_1$,$f_2$?
$underline { Guess}$: may be under some suitable condition it could be $Im(f_1)/Im(f_2)$ (the only natural thing that comes to my mind is this even though I do not see why Im$f_2$ should be embedded in Im$f_1$).But I do not see any clue how to proceed further.
$underline {Question (2)}$: even if we cannot represent it generally in terms of kernel,cokernel and image of $f_1,f_2 $ how to think of this image category theoretically,i.e diagrammatically.
Any help from anyone is welcome.
category-theory abelian-categories
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Why exactly do you think there should be something like this in Question 1? I mean, if I encounter such a question, the first thing I would do is to see if this holds for abelian groups or vector spaces over some field.
$endgroup$
– Paul K
Dec 16 '18 at 16:47
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$underline {Background}$: Suppose ,we are in an abelian category $mathcal C$ and let $B in mathcal C$ be an object.
Let,$f_1,f_2 in Hom(B,B)$.
Since $mathcal C$ is an abelian category $f_1-f_2 in Hom(B,B)$.
$underline {Question(1)}$:what is the image of $f_1-f_2$?
i.e can we calculate this image in general in terms of kernel ,cokernel ,image of the morphisms $f_1$,$f_2$?
$underline { Guess}$: may be under some suitable condition it could be $Im(f_1)/Im(f_2)$ (the only natural thing that comes to my mind is this even though I do not see why Im$f_2$ should be embedded in Im$f_1$).But I do not see any clue how to proceed further.
$underline {Question (2)}$: even if we cannot represent it generally in terms of kernel,cokernel and image of $f_1,f_2 $ how to think of this image category theoretically,i.e diagrammatically.
Any help from anyone is welcome.
category-theory abelian-categories
$endgroup$
$underline {Background}$: Suppose ,we are in an abelian category $mathcal C$ and let $B in mathcal C$ be an object.
Let,$f_1,f_2 in Hom(B,B)$.
Since $mathcal C$ is an abelian category $f_1-f_2 in Hom(B,B)$.
$underline {Question(1)}$:what is the image of $f_1-f_2$?
i.e can we calculate this image in general in terms of kernel ,cokernel ,image of the morphisms $f_1$,$f_2$?
$underline { Guess}$: may be under some suitable condition it could be $Im(f_1)/Im(f_2)$ (the only natural thing that comes to my mind is this even though I do not see why Im$f_2$ should be embedded in Im$f_1$).But I do not see any clue how to proceed further.
$underline {Question (2)}$: even if we cannot represent it generally in terms of kernel,cokernel and image of $f_1,f_2 $ how to think of this image category theoretically,i.e diagrammatically.
Any help from anyone is welcome.
category-theory abelian-categories
category-theory abelian-categories
asked Dec 16 '18 at 8:25
HARRYHARRY
889
889
$begingroup$
Why exactly do you think there should be something like this in Question 1? I mean, if I encounter such a question, the first thing I would do is to see if this holds for abelian groups or vector spaces over some field.
$endgroup$
– Paul K
Dec 16 '18 at 16:47
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Why exactly do you think there should be something like this in Question 1? I mean, if I encounter such a question, the first thing I would do is to see if this holds for abelian groups or vector spaces over some field.
$endgroup$
– Paul K
Dec 16 '18 at 16:47
$begingroup$
Why exactly do you think there should be something like this in Question 1? I mean, if I encounter such a question, the first thing I would do is to see if this holds for abelian groups or vector spaces over some field.
$endgroup$
– Paul K
Dec 16 '18 at 16:47
$begingroup$
Why exactly do you think there should be something like this in Question 1? I mean, if I encounter such a question, the first thing I would do is to see if this holds for abelian groups or vector spaces over some field.
$endgroup$
– Paul K
Dec 16 '18 at 16:47
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Question 1: You cannot say anything about the image of $f_1-f_2$. Here is an example. Let $mathcal{C}$ be the category of real vector spaces and $B = mathbb{R}^n$. The set $text{End}(mathbb{R}^n)$ of endomorphisms $phi : mathbb{R}^n to mathbb{R}^n$ is a normed linear space and it is well-known that the set $text{GL}(mathbb{R}^n)$ of automorphisms is open in $text{End}(mathbb{R}^n)$.
Let $f_1 = id_B$ and $V subset mathbb{R}^n$ any linear subspace. Choose any linear map $g : mathbb{R}^n to mathbb{R}^n$ such that $text{im}(g) = V$. Hence for sufficiently small $epsilon > 0$ the linear map $f_2 = id_B + epsilon g$ belongs to $text{GL}(mathbb{R}^n)$.
Both $f_1, f_2$ are isomorphisms, thus their kernels and cokernels are trivial and their images are $mathbb{R}^n$. However, $f_1 - f_2 = - epsilon g$ whose image is $V$.
Question 2: I do not think that one can get a reasonable answer.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3042364%2fon-morphisms-in-an-abelian-category%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Question 1: You cannot say anything about the image of $f_1-f_2$. Here is an example. Let $mathcal{C}$ be the category of real vector spaces and $B = mathbb{R}^n$. The set $text{End}(mathbb{R}^n)$ of endomorphisms $phi : mathbb{R}^n to mathbb{R}^n$ is a normed linear space and it is well-known that the set $text{GL}(mathbb{R}^n)$ of automorphisms is open in $text{End}(mathbb{R}^n)$.
Let $f_1 = id_B$ and $V subset mathbb{R}^n$ any linear subspace. Choose any linear map $g : mathbb{R}^n to mathbb{R}^n$ such that $text{im}(g) = V$. Hence for sufficiently small $epsilon > 0$ the linear map $f_2 = id_B + epsilon g$ belongs to $text{GL}(mathbb{R}^n)$.
Both $f_1, f_2$ are isomorphisms, thus their kernels and cokernels are trivial and their images are $mathbb{R}^n$. However, $f_1 - f_2 = - epsilon g$ whose image is $V$.
Question 2: I do not think that one can get a reasonable answer.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Question 1: You cannot say anything about the image of $f_1-f_2$. Here is an example. Let $mathcal{C}$ be the category of real vector spaces and $B = mathbb{R}^n$. The set $text{End}(mathbb{R}^n)$ of endomorphisms $phi : mathbb{R}^n to mathbb{R}^n$ is a normed linear space and it is well-known that the set $text{GL}(mathbb{R}^n)$ of automorphisms is open in $text{End}(mathbb{R}^n)$.
Let $f_1 = id_B$ and $V subset mathbb{R}^n$ any linear subspace. Choose any linear map $g : mathbb{R}^n to mathbb{R}^n$ such that $text{im}(g) = V$. Hence for sufficiently small $epsilon > 0$ the linear map $f_2 = id_B + epsilon g$ belongs to $text{GL}(mathbb{R}^n)$.
Both $f_1, f_2$ are isomorphisms, thus their kernels and cokernels are trivial and their images are $mathbb{R}^n$. However, $f_1 - f_2 = - epsilon g$ whose image is $V$.
Question 2: I do not think that one can get a reasonable answer.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Question 1: You cannot say anything about the image of $f_1-f_2$. Here is an example. Let $mathcal{C}$ be the category of real vector spaces and $B = mathbb{R}^n$. The set $text{End}(mathbb{R}^n)$ of endomorphisms $phi : mathbb{R}^n to mathbb{R}^n$ is a normed linear space and it is well-known that the set $text{GL}(mathbb{R}^n)$ of automorphisms is open in $text{End}(mathbb{R}^n)$.
Let $f_1 = id_B$ and $V subset mathbb{R}^n$ any linear subspace. Choose any linear map $g : mathbb{R}^n to mathbb{R}^n$ such that $text{im}(g) = V$. Hence for sufficiently small $epsilon > 0$ the linear map $f_2 = id_B + epsilon g$ belongs to $text{GL}(mathbb{R}^n)$.
Both $f_1, f_2$ are isomorphisms, thus their kernels and cokernels are trivial and their images are $mathbb{R}^n$. However, $f_1 - f_2 = - epsilon g$ whose image is $V$.
Question 2: I do not think that one can get a reasonable answer.
$endgroup$
Question 1: You cannot say anything about the image of $f_1-f_2$. Here is an example. Let $mathcal{C}$ be the category of real vector spaces and $B = mathbb{R}^n$. The set $text{End}(mathbb{R}^n)$ of endomorphisms $phi : mathbb{R}^n to mathbb{R}^n$ is a normed linear space and it is well-known that the set $text{GL}(mathbb{R}^n)$ of automorphisms is open in $text{End}(mathbb{R}^n)$.
Let $f_1 = id_B$ and $V subset mathbb{R}^n$ any linear subspace. Choose any linear map $g : mathbb{R}^n to mathbb{R}^n$ such that $text{im}(g) = V$. Hence for sufficiently small $epsilon > 0$ the linear map $f_2 = id_B + epsilon g$ belongs to $text{GL}(mathbb{R}^n)$.
Both $f_1, f_2$ are isomorphisms, thus their kernels and cokernels are trivial and their images are $mathbb{R}^n$. However, $f_1 - f_2 = - epsilon g$ whose image is $V$.
Question 2: I do not think that one can get a reasonable answer.
answered Dec 16 '18 at 9:18
Paul FrostPaul Frost
10.6k3933
10.6k3933
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3042364%2fon-morphisms-in-an-abelian-category%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Why exactly do you think there should be something like this in Question 1? I mean, if I encounter such a question, the first thing I would do is to see if this holds for abelian groups or vector spaces over some field.
$endgroup$
– Paul K
Dec 16 '18 at 16:47