Show that if a linear dynamical equation is controllable at $t_0$, then it is controllable at any $t<t_0$.
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Consider a $n$-dimentional $p$-input equation:
$$dot{x}=Ax+Bu$$
where $A$ and $B$ are constant $ntimes n$ and $ntimes p$ real matrices.
By definition, the latter state equation is said to be controllable if for any initial state $x(0)=x_0$ and any final state $x_1$, there exists an input that transfers $x_0$ to $x_1$ in a finite time.
Then, how can I show that if a linear dynamical equation is controllable at $t_0$ then it is controllable at any $t<t_0$?
control-theory linear-control
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Consider a $n$-dimentional $p$-input equation:
$$dot{x}=Ax+Bu$$
where $A$ and $B$ are constant $ntimes n$ and $ntimes p$ real matrices.
By definition, the latter state equation is said to be controllable if for any initial state $x(0)=x_0$ and any final state $x_1$, there exists an input that transfers $x_0$ to $x_1$ in a finite time.
Then, how can I show that if a linear dynamical equation is controllable at $t_0$ then it is controllable at any $t<t_0$?
control-theory linear-control
Do you mean a linear time invariant system, because general linear systems also include linear time variant systems?
– Kwin van der Veen
Nov 22 at 0:20
yeah linear time invariant system
– Ali G
Nov 22 at 3:54
Without loss of gbenerality, you can show if the terminal state $x_1=0$ at time $t_0$, then $x(t)=0$ for all $t>t_0$ .
– Gustave
Nov 23 at 14:39
What have you done? Perhaps it would be useful to find the solution of the system for $x$. Can you write down this formula?
– SZN
Nov 27 at 3:37
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Consider a $n$-dimentional $p$-input equation:
$$dot{x}=Ax+Bu$$
where $A$ and $B$ are constant $ntimes n$ and $ntimes p$ real matrices.
By definition, the latter state equation is said to be controllable if for any initial state $x(0)=x_0$ and any final state $x_1$, there exists an input that transfers $x_0$ to $x_1$ in a finite time.
Then, how can I show that if a linear dynamical equation is controllable at $t_0$ then it is controllable at any $t<t_0$?
control-theory linear-control
Consider a $n$-dimentional $p$-input equation:
$$dot{x}=Ax+Bu$$
where $A$ and $B$ are constant $ntimes n$ and $ntimes p$ real matrices.
By definition, the latter state equation is said to be controllable if for any initial state $x(0)=x_0$ and any final state $x_1$, there exists an input that transfers $x_0$ to $x_1$ in a finite time.
Then, how can I show that if a linear dynamical equation is controllable at $t_0$ then it is controllable at any $t<t_0$?
control-theory linear-control
control-theory linear-control
edited Nov 27 at 3:35
SZN
2,713720
2,713720
asked Nov 21 at 23:08
Ali G
113
113
Do you mean a linear time invariant system, because general linear systems also include linear time variant systems?
– Kwin van der Veen
Nov 22 at 0:20
yeah linear time invariant system
– Ali G
Nov 22 at 3:54
Without loss of gbenerality, you can show if the terminal state $x_1=0$ at time $t_0$, then $x(t)=0$ for all $t>t_0$ .
– Gustave
Nov 23 at 14:39
What have you done? Perhaps it would be useful to find the solution of the system for $x$. Can you write down this formula?
– SZN
Nov 27 at 3:37
add a comment |
Do you mean a linear time invariant system, because general linear systems also include linear time variant systems?
– Kwin van der Veen
Nov 22 at 0:20
yeah linear time invariant system
– Ali G
Nov 22 at 3:54
Without loss of gbenerality, you can show if the terminal state $x_1=0$ at time $t_0$, then $x(t)=0$ for all $t>t_0$ .
– Gustave
Nov 23 at 14:39
What have you done? Perhaps it would be useful to find the solution of the system for $x$. Can you write down this formula?
– SZN
Nov 27 at 3:37
Do you mean a linear time invariant system, because general linear systems also include linear time variant systems?
– Kwin van der Veen
Nov 22 at 0:20
Do you mean a linear time invariant system, because general linear systems also include linear time variant systems?
– Kwin van der Veen
Nov 22 at 0:20
yeah linear time invariant system
– Ali G
Nov 22 at 3:54
yeah linear time invariant system
– Ali G
Nov 22 at 3:54
Without loss of gbenerality, you can show if the terminal state $x_1=0$ at time $t_0$, then $x(t)=0$ for all $t>t_0$ .
– Gustave
Nov 23 at 14:39
Without loss of gbenerality, you can show if the terminal state $x_1=0$ at time $t_0$, then $x(t)=0$ for all $t>t_0$ .
– Gustave
Nov 23 at 14:39
What have you done? Perhaps it would be useful to find the solution of the system for $x$. Can you write down this formula?
– SZN
Nov 27 at 3:37
What have you done? Perhaps it would be useful to find the solution of the system for $x$. Can you write down this formula?
– SZN
Nov 27 at 3:37
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
Recall that $dot{x} = Ax + Bu$, then $(A,B)$ is controllable with control law (with minimum energy) given by
$$u(t) = -B^{T}e^{A^{T}(t_1-t)}W_c^{-1}(t_1)(e^{At_1}x_0 -x_1), $$
where
$$W_c(t) = int_0^te^{Atau}BB^{T}e^{A^{T}tau}dtau.$$
For $W_c$ nonsingular, then equivalence is $(A,B)$ is controllable.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3008510%2fshow-that-if-a-linear-dynamical-equation-is-controllable-at-t-0-then-it-is-co%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
Recall that $dot{x} = Ax + Bu$, then $(A,B)$ is controllable with control law (with minimum energy) given by
$$u(t) = -B^{T}e^{A^{T}(t_1-t)}W_c^{-1}(t_1)(e^{At_1}x_0 -x_1), $$
where
$$W_c(t) = int_0^te^{Atau}BB^{T}e^{A^{T}tau}dtau.$$
For $W_c$ nonsingular, then equivalence is $(A,B)$ is controllable.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Recall that $dot{x} = Ax + Bu$, then $(A,B)$ is controllable with control law (with minimum energy) given by
$$u(t) = -B^{T}e^{A^{T}(t_1-t)}W_c^{-1}(t_1)(e^{At_1}x_0 -x_1), $$
where
$$W_c(t) = int_0^te^{Atau}BB^{T}e^{A^{T}tau}dtau.$$
For $W_c$ nonsingular, then equivalence is $(A,B)$ is controllable.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
Recall that $dot{x} = Ax + Bu$, then $(A,B)$ is controllable with control law (with minimum energy) given by
$$u(t) = -B^{T}e^{A^{T}(t_1-t)}W_c^{-1}(t_1)(e^{At_1}x_0 -x_1), $$
where
$$W_c(t) = int_0^te^{Atau}BB^{T}e^{A^{T}tau}dtau.$$
For $W_c$ nonsingular, then equivalence is $(A,B)$ is controllable.
Recall that $dot{x} = Ax + Bu$, then $(A,B)$ is controllable with control law (with minimum energy) given by
$$u(t) = -B^{T}e^{A^{T}(t_1-t)}W_c^{-1}(t_1)(e^{At_1}x_0 -x_1), $$
where
$$W_c(t) = int_0^te^{Atau}BB^{T}e^{A^{T}tau}dtau.$$
For $W_c$ nonsingular, then equivalence is $(A,B)$ is controllable.
answered Nov 27 at 3:57
Euler....IS_ALIVE
2,64311338
2,64311338
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3008510%2fshow-that-if-a-linear-dynamical-equation-is-controllable-at-t-0-then-it-is-co%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Do you mean a linear time invariant system, because general linear systems also include linear time variant systems?
– Kwin van der Veen
Nov 22 at 0:20
yeah linear time invariant system
– Ali G
Nov 22 at 3:54
Without loss of gbenerality, you can show if the terminal state $x_1=0$ at time $t_0$, then $x(t)=0$ for all $t>t_0$ .
– Gustave
Nov 23 at 14:39
What have you done? Perhaps it would be useful to find the solution of the system for $x$. Can you write down this formula?
– SZN
Nov 27 at 3:37