Is the answer wrong: linear algebra done right Ex. 2B Q4












0












$begingroup$


Here is the answer. The underlined vector is the place where I am confused.



enter image description here
Beware the little ~ before the equation, It is not a minus sign.



In part (a):
$$U={(z_1, 6z_1, -2z_4-3z_5, z_4, z_5) in mathbb{R}^3}$$
Then the solution to part (a) is $(1,6,0,0,0), (0,0,-2,1,0), (0,0,-3,0,1)$ why the answer is $(1,6,0,0,0), (0,0,2,-1,0), (0,0,3,0,-1)$? (just multiply $-1$?)



In part (b)
Should the answer be $(1,6,0,0,0), (0,0,-2,1,0), (0,0,-3,0,1), (0,1,0,0,0), (0,0,1,0,0)$ since we need to add $z_2$ and $z_3$? (This is how I think. Some dimensions are missing, and then add them back. Please correct me if I am wrong.)










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    There is no difference between $(0,0,2,-1,0)$ and $(0,0,-2,1,0)$ as a basis vector. If $vec{a}$ is part of a basis set, so is $lambda vec{a}$ for any $lambda neq 0$. And why do you think some dimensions are missing?
    $endgroup$
    – stressed out
    Jan 2 at 23:12








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    OK. I get it now. Well, you have found $3$ vectors so far but you need $5$. So, you should add two linearly independent vectors to your current set of $3$ vectors. There are many ways to do this. Your book chooses an easy way: check the two most obvious ones: $(1,0,0,0,0)$ and $(0,0,1,0,0)$. If they work (i.e. they're linearly independent from the other three), you're done. Now the only thing that's left to check is whether they're linearly independent or not. Can you proceed from there? To know whether it's wrong or not you should check whether the proposed set is linearly independent or not.
    $endgroup$
    – stressed out
    Jan 2 at 23:46








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    There are many ways to obtain a basis for a vector space. A vector space doesn't have a unique basis, so it's possible to find many different bases for the same vector space. If you think your answer works, you should prove that the set you have found is linearly independent and it spans the space. If this condition is satisfied, your answer is correct. Otherwise, it's not. And just because your answer is correct, it won't disprove other answers because as I said, there always exist different bases for the same vector spaces.
    $endgroup$
    – stressed out
    Jan 3 at 1:26






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @stressedout got it!
    $endgroup$
    – JOHN
    Jan 3 at 1:30






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    $U$ is most definitely not $mathbb C^3$. It is a three-dimensional subspace of $mathbb C^5$. Try to get out of the bad habit of calling any old three-dimensional complex vector space “$mathbb C^3$.”
    $endgroup$
    – amd
    Jan 3 at 1:38
















0












$begingroup$


Here is the answer. The underlined vector is the place where I am confused.



enter image description here
Beware the little ~ before the equation, It is not a minus sign.



In part (a):
$$U={(z_1, 6z_1, -2z_4-3z_5, z_4, z_5) in mathbb{R}^3}$$
Then the solution to part (a) is $(1,6,0,0,0), (0,0,-2,1,0), (0,0,-3,0,1)$ why the answer is $(1,6,0,0,0), (0,0,2,-1,0), (0,0,3,0,-1)$? (just multiply $-1$?)



In part (b)
Should the answer be $(1,6,0,0,0), (0,0,-2,1,0), (0,0,-3,0,1), (0,1,0,0,0), (0,0,1,0,0)$ since we need to add $z_2$ and $z_3$? (This is how I think. Some dimensions are missing, and then add them back. Please correct me if I am wrong.)










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    There is no difference between $(0,0,2,-1,0)$ and $(0,0,-2,1,0)$ as a basis vector. If $vec{a}$ is part of a basis set, so is $lambda vec{a}$ for any $lambda neq 0$. And why do you think some dimensions are missing?
    $endgroup$
    – stressed out
    Jan 2 at 23:12








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    OK. I get it now. Well, you have found $3$ vectors so far but you need $5$. So, you should add two linearly independent vectors to your current set of $3$ vectors. There are many ways to do this. Your book chooses an easy way: check the two most obvious ones: $(1,0,0,0,0)$ and $(0,0,1,0,0)$. If they work (i.e. they're linearly independent from the other three), you're done. Now the only thing that's left to check is whether they're linearly independent or not. Can you proceed from there? To know whether it's wrong or not you should check whether the proposed set is linearly independent or not.
    $endgroup$
    – stressed out
    Jan 2 at 23:46








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    There are many ways to obtain a basis for a vector space. A vector space doesn't have a unique basis, so it's possible to find many different bases for the same vector space. If you think your answer works, you should prove that the set you have found is linearly independent and it spans the space. If this condition is satisfied, your answer is correct. Otherwise, it's not. And just because your answer is correct, it won't disprove other answers because as I said, there always exist different bases for the same vector spaces.
    $endgroup$
    – stressed out
    Jan 3 at 1:26






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @stressedout got it!
    $endgroup$
    – JOHN
    Jan 3 at 1:30






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    $U$ is most definitely not $mathbb C^3$. It is a three-dimensional subspace of $mathbb C^5$. Try to get out of the bad habit of calling any old three-dimensional complex vector space “$mathbb C^3$.”
    $endgroup$
    – amd
    Jan 3 at 1:38














0












0








0





$begingroup$


Here is the answer. The underlined vector is the place where I am confused.



enter image description here
Beware the little ~ before the equation, It is not a minus sign.



In part (a):
$$U={(z_1, 6z_1, -2z_4-3z_5, z_4, z_5) in mathbb{R}^3}$$
Then the solution to part (a) is $(1,6,0,0,0), (0,0,-2,1,0), (0,0,-3,0,1)$ why the answer is $(1,6,0,0,0), (0,0,2,-1,0), (0,0,3,0,-1)$? (just multiply $-1$?)



In part (b)
Should the answer be $(1,6,0,0,0), (0,0,-2,1,0), (0,0,-3,0,1), (0,1,0,0,0), (0,0,1,0,0)$ since we need to add $z_2$ and $z_3$? (This is how I think. Some dimensions are missing, and then add them back. Please correct me if I am wrong.)










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




Here is the answer. The underlined vector is the place where I am confused.



enter image description here
Beware the little ~ before the equation, It is not a minus sign.



In part (a):
$$U={(z_1, 6z_1, -2z_4-3z_5, z_4, z_5) in mathbb{R}^3}$$
Then the solution to part (a) is $(1,6,0,0,0), (0,0,-2,1,0), (0,0,-3,0,1)$ why the answer is $(1,6,0,0,0), (0,0,2,-1,0), (0,0,3,0,-1)$? (just multiply $-1$?)



In part (b)
Should the answer be $(1,6,0,0,0), (0,0,-2,1,0), (0,0,-3,0,1), (0,1,0,0,0), (0,0,1,0,0)$ since we need to add $z_2$ and $z_3$? (This is how I think. Some dimensions are missing, and then add them back. Please correct me if I am wrong.)







linear-algebra






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Jan 2 at 23:08









JOHN JOHN

4119




4119








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    There is no difference between $(0,0,2,-1,0)$ and $(0,0,-2,1,0)$ as a basis vector. If $vec{a}$ is part of a basis set, so is $lambda vec{a}$ for any $lambda neq 0$. And why do you think some dimensions are missing?
    $endgroup$
    – stressed out
    Jan 2 at 23:12








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    OK. I get it now. Well, you have found $3$ vectors so far but you need $5$. So, you should add two linearly independent vectors to your current set of $3$ vectors. There are many ways to do this. Your book chooses an easy way: check the two most obvious ones: $(1,0,0,0,0)$ and $(0,0,1,0,0)$. If they work (i.e. they're linearly independent from the other three), you're done. Now the only thing that's left to check is whether they're linearly independent or not. Can you proceed from there? To know whether it's wrong or not you should check whether the proposed set is linearly independent or not.
    $endgroup$
    – stressed out
    Jan 2 at 23:46








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    There are many ways to obtain a basis for a vector space. A vector space doesn't have a unique basis, so it's possible to find many different bases for the same vector space. If you think your answer works, you should prove that the set you have found is linearly independent and it spans the space. If this condition is satisfied, your answer is correct. Otherwise, it's not. And just because your answer is correct, it won't disprove other answers because as I said, there always exist different bases for the same vector spaces.
    $endgroup$
    – stressed out
    Jan 3 at 1:26






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @stressedout got it!
    $endgroup$
    – JOHN
    Jan 3 at 1:30






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    $U$ is most definitely not $mathbb C^3$. It is a three-dimensional subspace of $mathbb C^5$. Try to get out of the bad habit of calling any old three-dimensional complex vector space “$mathbb C^3$.”
    $endgroup$
    – amd
    Jan 3 at 1:38














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    There is no difference between $(0,0,2,-1,0)$ and $(0,0,-2,1,0)$ as a basis vector. If $vec{a}$ is part of a basis set, so is $lambda vec{a}$ for any $lambda neq 0$. And why do you think some dimensions are missing?
    $endgroup$
    – stressed out
    Jan 2 at 23:12








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    OK. I get it now. Well, you have found $3$ vectors so far but you need $5$. So, you should add two linearly independent vectors to your current set of $3$ vectors. There are many ways to do this. Your book chooses an easy way: check the two most obvious ones: $(1,0,0,0,0)$ and $(0,0,1,0,0)$. If they work (i.e. they're linearly independent from the other three), you're done. Now the only thing that's left to check is whether they're linearly independent or not. Can you proceed from there? To know whether it's wrong or not you should check whether the proposed set is linearly independent or not.
    $endgroup$
    – stressed out
    Jan 2 at 23:46








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    There are many ways to obtain a basis for a vector space. A vector space doesn't have a unique basis, so it's possible to find many different bases for the same vector space. If you think your answer works, you should prove that the set you have found is linearly independent and it spans the space. If this condition is satisfied, your answer is correct. Otherwise, it's not. And just because your answer is correct, it won't disprove other answers because as I said, there always exist different bases for the same vector spaces.
    $endgroup$
    – stressed out
    Jan 3 at 1:26






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @stressedout got it!
    $endgroup$
    – JOHN
    Jan 3 at 1:30






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    $U$ is most definitely not $mathbb C^3$. It is a three-dimensional subspace of $mathbb C^5$. Try to get out of the bad habit of calling any old three-dimensional complex vector space “$mathbb C^3$.”
    $endgroup$
    – amd
    Jan 3 at 1:38








1




1




$begingroup$
There is no difference between $(0,0,2,-1,0)$ and $(0,0,-2,1,0)$ as a basis vector. If $vec{a}$ is part of a basis set, so is $lambda vec{a}$ for any $lambda neq 0$. And why do you think some dimensions are missing?
$endgroup$
– stressed out
Jan 2 at 23:12






$begingroup$
There is no difference between $(0,0,2,-1,0)$ and $(0,0,-2,1,0)$ as a basis vector. If $vec{a}$ is part of a basis set, so is $lambda vec{a}$ for any $lambda neq 0$. And why do you think some dimensions are missing?
$endgroup$
– stressed out
Jan 2 at 23:12






3




3




$begingroup$
OK. I get it now. Well, you have found $3$ vectors so far but you need $5$. So, you should add two linearly independent vectors to your current set of $3$ vectors. There are many ways to do this. Your book chooses an easy way: check the two most obvious ones: $(1,0,0,0,0)$ and $(0,0,1,0,0)$. If they work (i.e. they're linearly independent from the other three), you're done. Now the only thing that's left to check is whether they're linearly independent or not. Can you proceed from there? To know whether it's wrong or not you should check whether the proposed set is linearly independent or not.
$endgroup$
– stressed out
Jan 2 at 23:46






$begingroup$
OK. I get it now. Well, you have found $3$ vectors so far but you need $5$. So, you should add two linearly independent vectors to your current set of $3$ vectors. There are many ways to do this. Your book chooses an easy way: check the two most obvious ones: $(1,0,0,0,0)$ and $(0,0,1,0,0)$. If they work (i.e. they're linearly independent from the other three), you're done. Now the only thing that's left to check is whether they're linearly independent or not. Can you proceed from there? To know whether it's wrong or not you should check whether the proposed set is linearly independent or not.
$endgroup$
– stressed out
Jan 2 at 23:46






1




1




$begingroup$
There are many ways to obtain a basis for a vector space. A vector space doesn't have a unique basis, so it's possible to find many different bases for the same vector space. If you think your answer works, you should prove that the set you have found is linearly independent and it spans the space. If this condition is satisfied, your answer is correct. Otherwise, it's not. And just because your answer is correct, it won't disprove other answers because as I said, there always exist different bases for the same vector spaces.
$endgroup$
– stressed out
Jan 3 at 1:26




$begingroup$
There are many ways to obtain a basis for a vector space. A vector space doesn't have a unique basis, so it's possible to find many different bases for the same vector space. If you think your answer works, you should prove that the set you have found is linearly independent and it spans the space. If this condition is satisfied, your answer is correct. Otherwise, it's not. And just because your answer is correct, it won't disprove other answers because as I said, there always exist different bases for the same vector spaces.
$endgroup$
– stressed out
Jan 3 at 1:26




1




1




$begingroup$
@stressedout got it!
$endgroup$
– JOHN
Jan 3 at 1:30




$begingroup$
@stressedout got it!
$endgroup$
– JOHN
Jan 3 at 1:30




1




1




$begingroup$
$U$ is most definitely not $mathbb C^3$. It is a three-dimensional subspace of $mathbb C^5$. Try to get out of the bad habit of calling any old three-dimensional complex vector space “$mathbb C^3$.”
$endgroup$
– amd
Jan 3 at 1:38




$begingroup$
$U$ is most definitely not $mathbb C^3$. It is a three-dimensional subspace of $mathbb C^5$. Try to get out of the bad habit of calling any old three-dimensional complex vector space “$mathbb C^3$.”
$endgroup$
– amd
Jan 3 at 1:38










0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3060082%2fis-the-answer-wrong-linear-algebra-done-right-ex-2b-q4%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3060082%2fis-the-answer-wrong-linear-algebra-done-right-ex-2b-q4%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Quarter-circle Tiles

build a pushdown automaton that recognizes the reverse language of a given pushdown automaton?

Mont Emei