B splines recursion











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












Given that by definition the i-th B-spline of order k is:
$$B_{i,k}=w_{i,k}B_{i,k-1}+(1-w_{i+1,k})B_{i+1,k-1}$$



where $w_{j,k}=frac{x-t_j}{t_{j+k-1}-t_j}$



We can define the spline space as
$$S_{k,t}:={sum_ialpha_iB_{i,k}:alpha_i in mathbb{R}} $$



The author pointed out that $$sum_ialpha_i B_{i,k}=sum_i(alpha_i w_{i,k}+alpha_{i-1}(1-w_{i,k}))B_{i,k-1}$$
but honestly I don't really get how to arrive to this expression, using the recursion I am able to obtain:
$$sum_ialpha_i B_{i,k}=sum_i(alpha_i w_{i,k}B_{i,k-1}+alpha_{i}(1-w_{i+1,k})B_{i+1,k-1})$$ which is nothing like the desired result.



Any hint will be greatly appreciated.










share|cite|improve this question


























    up vote
    0
    down vote

    favorite












    Given that by definition the i-th B-spline of order k is:
    $$B_{i,k}=w_{i,k}B_{i,k-1}+(1-w_{i+1,k})B_{i+1,k-1}$$



    where $w_{j,k}=frac{x-t_j}{t_{j+k-1}-t_j}$



    We can define the spline space as
    $$S_{k,t}:={sum_ialpha_iB_{i,k}:alpha_i in mathbb{R}} $$



    The author pointed out that $$sum_ialpha_i B_{i,k}=sum_i(alpha_i w_{i,k}+alpha_{i-1}(1-w_{i,k}))B_{i,k-1}$$
    but honestly I don't really get how to arrive to this expression, using the recursion I am able to obtain:
    $$sum_ialpha_i B_{i,k}=sum_i(alpha_i w_{i,k}B_{i,k-1}+alpha_{i}(1-w_{i+1,k})B_{i+1,k-1})$$ which is nothing like the desired result.



    Any hint will be greatly appreciated.










    share|cite|improve this question
























      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite











      Given that by definition the i-th B-spline of order k is:
      $$B_{i,k}=w_{i,k}B_{i,k-1}+(1-w_{i+1,k})B_{i+1,k-1}$$



      where $w_{j,k}=frac{x-t_j}{t_{j+k-1}-t_j}$



      We can define the spline space as
      $$S_{k,t}:={sum_ialpha_iB_{i,k}:alpha_i in mathbb{R}} $$



      The author pointed out that $$sum_ialpha_i B_{i,k}=sum_i(alpha_i w_{i,k}+alpha_{i-1}(1-w_{i,k}))B_{i,k-1}$$
      but honestly I don't really get how to arrive to this expression, using the recursion I am able to obtain:
      $$sum_ialpha_i B_{i,k}=sum_i(alpha_i w_{i,k}B_{i,k-1}+alpha_{i}(1-w_{i+1,k})B_{i+1,k-1})$$ which is nothing like the desired result.



      Any hint will be greatly appreciated.










      share|cite|improve this question













      Given that by definition the i-th B-spline of order k is:
      $$B_{i,k}=w_{i,k}B_{i,k-1}+(1-w_{i+1,k})B_{i+1,k-1}$$



      where $w_{j,k}=frac{x-t_j}{t_{j+k-1}-t_j}$



      We can define the spline space as
      $$S_{k,t}:={sum_ialpha_iB_{i,k}:alpha_i in mathbb{R}} $$



      The author pointed out that $$sum_ialpha_i B_{i,k}=sum_i(alpha_i w_{i,k}+alpha_{i-1}(1-w_{i,k}))B_{i,k-1}$$
      but honestly I don't really get how to arrive to this expression, using the recursion I am able to obtain:
      $$sum_ialpha_i B_{i,k}=sum_i(alpha_i w_{i,k}B_{i,k-1}+alpha_{i}(1-w_{i+1,k})B_{i+1,k-1})$$ which is nothing like the desired result.



      Any hint will be greatly appreciated.







      functional-analysis recursion spline






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Nov 19 at 17:59









      Ramiro Scorolli

      62813




      62813






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted










          The two expressions coincide:
          $$
          begin{split}
          &phantom{=} sum_i(alpha_i w_{i,k}B_{i,k-1}+alpha_{i}(1-w_{i+1,k})B_{i+1,k-1}) \
          &= sum_i(alpha_i w_{i,k}B_{i,k-1}+alpha_{i-1}(1-w_{i,k})B_{i,k-1}) \
          &= sum_i(alpha_i w_{i,k}+alpha_{i-1}(1-w_{i,k}))B_{i,k-1} .
          end{split}
          $$






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • but why is $alpha_{i}(1-w_{i+1,k})B_{i+1,k-1}=alpha_{i-1}(1-w_{i,k})B_{i,k-1}$?
            – Ramiro Scorolli
            Nov 19 at 18:13








          • 1




            It is not. The equality is achieved when summing over all possible $i$. For instance $sum_{iinmathbb Z}c_i=sum_{iinmathbb Z}c_{i-1}$.
            – Federico
            Nov 19 at 18:18






          • 1




            In both series the same terms are appearing, just shifted.
            – Federico
            Nov 19 at 18:18










          • You are right, don't know why I didn't see that. Thanks
            – Ramiro Scorolli
            Nov 19 at 18:19











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3005267%2fb-splines-recursion%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted










          The two expressions coincide:
          $$
          begin{split}
          &phantom{=} sum_i(alpha_i w_{i,k}B_{i,k-1}+alpha_{i}(1-w_{i+1,k})B_{i+1,k-1}) \
          &= sum_i(alpha_i w_{i,k}B_{i,k-1}+alpha_{i-1}(1-w_{i,k})B_{i,k-1}) \
          &= sum_i(alpha_i w_{i,k}+alpha_{i-1}(1-w_{i,k}))B_{i,k-1} .
          end{split}
          $$






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • but why is $alpha_{i}(1-w_{i+1,k})B_{i+1,k-1}=alpha_{i-1}(1-w_{i,k})B_{i,k-1}$?
            – Ramiro Scorolli
            Nov 19 at 18:13








          • 1




            It is not. The equality is achieved when summing over all possible $i$. For instance $sum_{iinmathbb Z}c_i=sum_{iinmathbb Z}c_{i-1}$.
            – Federico
            Nov 19 at 18:18






          • 1




            In both series the same terms are appearing, just shifted.
            – Federico
            Nov 19 at 18:18










          • You are right, don't know why I didn't see that. Thanks
            – Ramiro Scorolli
            Nov 19 at 18:19















          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted










          The two expressions coincide:
          $$
          begin{split}
          &phantom{=} sum_i(alpha_i w_{i,k}B_{i,k-1}+alpha_{i}(1-w_{i+1,k})B_{i+1,k-1}) \
          &= sum_i(alpha_i w_{i,k}B_{i,k-1}+alpha_{i-1}(1-w_{i,k})B_{i,k-1}) \
          &= sum_i(alpha_i w_{i,k}+alpha_{i-1}(1-w_{i,k}))B_{i,k-1} .
          end{split}
          $$






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • but why is $alpha_{i}(1-w_{i+1,k})B_{i+1,k-1}=alpha_{i-1}(1-w_{i,k})B_{i,k-1}$?
            – Ramiro Scorolli
            Nov 19 at 18:13








          • 1




            It is not. The equality is achieved when summing over all possible $i$. For instance $sum_{iinmathbb Z}c_i=sum_{iinmathbb Z}c_{i-1}$.
            – Federico
            Nov 19 at 18:18






          • 1




            In both series the same terms are appearing, just shifted.
            – Federico
            Nov 19 at 18:18










          • You are right, don't know why I didn't see that. Thanks
            – Ramiro Scorolli
            Nov 19 at 18:19













          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted







          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted






          The two expressions coincide:
          $$
          begin{split}
          &phantom{=} sum_i(alpha_i w_{i,k}B_{i,k-1}+alpha_{i}(1-w_{i+1,k})B_{i+1,k-1}) \
          &= sum_i(alpha_i w_{i,k}B_{i,k-1}+alpha_{i-1}(1-w_{i,k})B_{i,k-1}) \
          &= sum_i(alpha_i w_{i,k}+alpha_{i-1}(1-w_{i,k}))B_{i,k-1} .
          end{split}
          $$






          share|cite|improve this answer












          The two expressions coincide:
          $$
          begin{split}
          &phantom{=} sum_i(alpha_i w_{i,k}B_{i,k-1}+alpha_{i}(1-w_{i+1,k})B_{i+1,k-1}) \
          &= sum_i(alpha_i w_{i,k}B_{i,k-1}+alpha_{i-1}(1-w_{i,k})B_{i,k-1}) \
          &= sum_i(alpha_i w_{i,k}+alpha_{i-1}(1-w_{i,k}))B_{i,k-1} .
          end{split}
          $$







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Nov 19 at 18:09









          Federico

          2,639510




          2,639510












          • but why is $alpha_{i}(1-w_{i+1,k})B_{i+1,k-1}=alpha_{i-1}(1-w_{i,k})B_{i,k-1}$?
            – Ramiro Scorolli
            Nov 19 at 18:13








          • 1




            It is not. The equality is achieved when summing over all possible $i$. For instance $sum_{iinmathbb Z}c_i=sum_{iinmathbb Z}c_{i-1}$.
            – Federico
            Nov 19 at 18:18






          • 1




            In both series the same terms are appearing, just shifted.
            – Federico
            Nov 19 at 18:18










          • You are right, don't know why I didn't see that. Thanks
            – Ramiro Scorolli
            Nov 19 at 18:19


















          • but why is $alpha_{i}(1-w_{i+1,k})B_{i+1,k-1}=alpha_{i-1}(1-w_{i,k})B_{i,k-1}$?
            – Ramiro Scorolli
            Nov 19 at 18:13








          • 1




            It is not. The equality is achieved when summing over all possible $i$. For instance $sum_{iinmathbb Z}c_i=sum_{iinmathbb Z}c_{i-1}$.
            – Federico
            Nov 19 at 18:18






          • 1




            In both series the same terms are appearing, just shifted.
            – Federico
            Nov 19 at 18:18










          • You are right, don't know why I didn't see that. Thanks
            – Ramiro Scorolli
            Nov 19 at 18:19
















          but why is $alpha_{i}(1-w_{i+1,k})B_{i+1,k-1}=alpha_{i-1}(1-w_{i,k})B_{i,k-1}$?
          – Ramiro Scorolli
          Nov 19 at 18:13






          but why is $alpha_{i}(1-w_{i+1,k})B_{i+1,k-1}=alpha_{i-1}(1-w_{i,k})B_{i,k-1}$?
          – Ramiro Scorolli
          Nov 19 at 18:13






          1




          1




          It is not. The equality is achieved when summing over all possible $i$. For instance $sum_{iinmathbb Z}c_i=sum_{iinmathbb Z}c_{i-1}$.
          – Federico
          Nov 19 at 18:18




          It is not. The equality is achieved when summing over all possible $i$. For instance $sum_{iinmathbb Z}c_i=sum_{iinmathbb Z}c_{i-1}$.
          – Federico
          Nov 19 at 18:18




          1




          1




          In both series the same terms are appearing, just shifted.
          – Federico
          Nov 19 at 18:18




          In both series the same terms are appearing, just shifted.
          – Federico
          Nov 19 at 18:18












          You are right, don't know why I didn't see that. Thanks
          – Ramiro Scorolli
          Nov 19 at 18:19




          You are right, don't know why I didn't see that. Thanks
          – Ramiro Scorolli
          Nov 19 at 18:19


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3005267%2fb-splines-recursion%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Mont Emei

          Province de Neuquén

          Journaliste