B splines recursion
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Given that by definition the i-th B-spline of order k is:
$$B_{i,k}=w_{i,k}B_{i,k-1}+(1-w_{i+1,k})B_{i+1,k-1}$$
where $w_{j,k}=frac{x-t_j}{t_{j+k-1}-t_j}$
We can define the spline space as
$$S_{k,t}:={sum_ialpha_iB_{i,k}:alpha_i in mathbb{R}} $$
The author pointed out that $$sum_ialpha_i B_{i,k}=sum_i(alpha_i w_{i,k}+alpha_{i-1}(1-w_{i,k}))B_{i,k-1}$$
but honestly I don't really get how to arrive to this expression, using the recursion I am able to obtain:
$$sum_ialpha_i B_{i,k}=sum_i(alpha_i w_{i,k}B_{i,k-1}+alpha_{i}(1-w_{i+1,k})B_{i+1,k-1})$$ which is nothing like the desired result.
Any hint will be greatly appreciated.
functional-analysis recursion spline
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Given that by definition the i-th B-spline of order k is:
$$B_{i,k}=w_{i,k}B_{i,k-1}+(1-w_{i+1,k})B_{i+1,k-1}$$
where $w_{j,k}=frac{x-t_j}{t_{j+k-1}-t_j}$
We can define the spline space as
$$S_{k,t}:={sum_ialpha_iB_{i,k}:alpha_i in mathbb{R}} $$
The author pointed out that $$sum_ialpha_i B_{i,k}=sum_i(alpha_i w_{i,k}+alpha_{i-1}(1-w_{i,k}))B_{i,k-1}$$
but honestly I don't really get how to arrive to this expression, using the recursion I am able to obtain:
$$sum_ialpha_i B_{i,k}=sum_i(alpha_i w_{i,k}B_{i,k-1}+alpha_{i}(1-w_{i+1,k})B_{i+1,k-1})$$ which is nothing like the desired result.
Any hint will be greatly appreciated.
functional-analysis recursion spline
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Given that by definition the i-th B-spline of order k is:
$$B_{i,k}=w_{i,k}B_{i,k-1}+(1-w_{i+1,k})B_{i+1,k-1}$$
where $w_{j,k}=frac{x-t_j}{t_{j+k-1}-t_j}$
We can define the spline space as
$$S_{k,t}:={sum_ialpha_iB_{i,k}:alpha_i in mathbb{R}} $$
The author pointed out that $$sum_ialpha_i B_{i,k}=sum_i(alpha_i w_{i,k}+alpha_{i-1}(1-w_{i,k}))B_{i,k-1}$$
but honestly I don't really get how to arrive to this expression, using the recursion I am able to obtain:
$$sum_ialpha_i B_{i,k}=sum_i(alpha_i w_{i,k}B_{i,k-1}+alpha_{i}(1-w_{i+1,k})B_{i+1,k-1})$$ which is nothing like the desired result.
Any hint will be greatly appreciated.
functional-analysis recursion spline
Given that by definition the i-th B-spline of order k is:
$$B_{i,k}=w_{i,k}B_{i,k-1}+(1-w_{i+1,k})B_{i+1,k-1}$$
where $w_{j,k}=frac{x-t_j}{t_{j+k-1}-t_j}$
We can define the spline space as
$$S_{k,t}:={sum_ialpha_iB_{i,k}:alpha_i in mathbb{R}} $$
The author pointed out that $$sum_ialpha_i B_{i,k}=sum_i(alpha_i w_{i,k}+alpha_{i-1}(1-w_{i,k}))B_{i,k-1}$$
but honestly I don't really get how to arrive to this expression, using the recursion I am able to obtain:
$$sum_ialpha_i B_{i,k}=sum_i(alpha_i w_{i,k}B_{i,k-1}+alpha_{i}(1-w_{i+1,k})B_{i+1,k-1})$$ which is nothing like the desired result.
Any hint will be greatly appreciated.
functional-analysis recursion spline
functional-analysis recursion spline
asked Nov 19 at 17:59
Ramiro Scorolli
62813
62813
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
The two expressions coincide:
$$
begin{split}
&phantom{=} sum_i(alpha_i w_{i,k}B_{i,k-1}+alpha_{i}(1-w_{i+1,k})B_{i+1,k-1}) \
&= sum_i(alpha_i w_{i,k}B_{i,k-1}+alpha_{i-1}(1-w_{i,k})B_{i,k-1}) \
&= sum_i(alpha_i w_{i,k}+alpha_{i-1}(1-w_{i,k}))B_{i,k-1} .
end{split}
$$
but why is $alpha_{i}(1-w_{i+1,k})B_{i+1,k-1}=alpha_{i-1}(1-w_{i,k})B_{i,k-1}$?
– Ramiro Scorolli
Nov 19 at 18:13
1
It is not. The equality is achieved when summing over all possible $i$. For instance $sum_{iinmathbb Z}c_i=sum_{iinmathbb Z}c_{i-1}$.
– Federico
Nov 19 at 18:18
1
In both series the same terms are appearing, just shifted.
– Federico
Nov 19 at 18:18
You are right, don't know why I didn't see that. Thanks
– Ramiro Scorolli
Nov 19 at 18:19
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
The two expressions coincide:
$$
begin{split}
&phantom{=} sum_i(alpha_i w_{i,k}B_{i,k-1}+alpha_{i}(1-w_{i+1,k})B_{i+1,k-1}) \
&= sum_i(alpha_i w_{i,k}B_{i,k-1}+alpha_{i-1}(1-w_{i,k})B_{i,k-1}) \
&= sum_i(alpha_i w_{i,k}+alpha_{i-1}(1-w_{i,k}))B_{i,k-1} .
end{split}
$$
but why is $alpha_{i}(1-w_{i+1,k})B_{i+1,k-1}=alpha_{i-1}(1-w_{i,k})B_{i,k-1}$?
– Ramiro Scorolli
Nov 19 at 18:13
1
It is not. The equality is achieved when summing over all possible $i$. For instance $sum_{iinmathbb Z}c_i=sum_{iinmathbb Z}c_{i-1}$.
– Federico
Nov 19 at 18:18
1
In both series the same terms are appearing, just shifted.
– Federico
Nov 19 at 18:18
You are right, don't know why I didn't see that. Thanks
– Ramiro Scorolli
Nov 19 at 18:19
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
The two expressions coincide:
$$
begin{split}
&phantom{=} sum_i(alpha_i w_{i,k}B_{i,k-1}+alpha_{i}(1-w_{i+1,k})B_{i+1,k-1}) \
&= sum_i(alpha_i w_{i,k}B_{i,k-1}+alpha_{i-1}(1-w_{i,k})B_{i,k-1}) \
&= sum_i(alpha_i w_{i,k}+alpha_{i-1}(1-w_{i,k}))B_{i,k-1} .
end{split}
$$
but why is $alpha_{i}(1-w_{i+1,k})B_{i+1,k-1}=alpha_{i-1}(1-w_{i,k})B_{i,k-1}$?
– Ramiro Scorolli
Nov 19 at 18:13
1
It is not. The equality is achieved when summing over all possible $i$. For instance $sum_{iinmathbb Z}c_i=sum_{iinmathbb Z}c_{i-1}$.
– Federico
Nov 19 at 18:18
1
In both series the same terms are appearing, just shifted.
– Federico
Nov 19 at 18:18
You are right, don't know why I didn't see that. Thanks
– Ramiro Scorolli
Nov 19 at 18:19
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
The two expressions coincide:
$$
begin{split}
&phantom{=} sum_i(alpha_i w_{i,k}B_{i,k-1}+alpha_{i}(1-w_{i+1,k})B_{i+1,k-1}) \
&= sum_i(alpha_i w_{i,k}B_{i,k-1}+alpha_{i-1}(1-w_{i,k})B_{i,k-1}) \
&= sum_i(alpha_i w_{i,k}+alpha_{i-1}(1-w_{i,k}))B_{i,k-1} .
end{split}
$$
The two expressions coincide:
$$
begin{split}
&phantom{=} sum_i(alpha_i w_{i,k}B_{i,k-1}+alpha_{i}(1-w_{i+1,k})B_{i+1,k-1}) \
&= sum_i(alpha_i w_{i,k}B_{i,k-1}+alpha_{i-1}(1-w_{i,k})B_{i,k-1}) \
&= sum_i(alpha_i w_{i,k}+alpha_{i-1}(1-w_{i,k}))B_{i,k-1} .
end{split}
$$
answered Nov 19 at 18:09
Federico
2,639510
2,639510
but why is $alpha_{i}(1-w_{i+1,k})B_{i+1,k-1}=alpha_{i-1}(1-w_{i,k})B_{i,k-1}$?
– Ramiro Scorolli
Nov 19 at 18:13
1
It is not. The equality is achieved when summing over all possible $i$. For instance $sum_{iinmathbb Z}c_i=sum_{iinmathbb Z}c_{i-1}$.
– Federico
Nov 19 at 18:18
1
In both series the same terms are appearing, just shifted.
– Federico
Nov 19 at 18:18
You are right, don't know why I didn't see that. Thanks
– Ramiro Scorolli
Nov 19 at 18:19
add a comment |
but why is $alpha_{i}(1-w_{i+1,k})B_{i+1,k-1}=alpha_{i-1}(1-w_{i,k})B_{i,k-1}$?
– Ramiro Scorolli
Nov 19 at 18:13
1
It is not. The equality is achieved when summing over all possible $i$. For instance $sum_{iinmathbb Z}c_i=sum_{iinmathbb Z}c_{i-1}$.
– Federico
Nov 19 at 18:18
1
In both series the same terms are appearing, just shifted.
– Federico
Nov 19 at 18:18
You are right, don't know why I didn't see that. Thanks
– Ramiro Scorolli
Nov 19 at 18:19
but why is $alpha_{i}(1-w_{i+1,k})B_{i+1,k-1}=alpha_{i-1}(1-w_{i,k})B_{i,k-1}$?
– Ramiro Scorolli
Nov 19 at 18:13
but why is $alpha_{i}(1-w_{i+1,k})B_{i+1,k-1}=alpha_{i-1}(1-w_{i,k})B_{i,k-1}$?
– Ramiro Scorolli
Nov 19 at 18:13
1
1
It is not. The equality is achieved when summing over all possible $i$. For instance $sum_{iinmathbb Z}c_i=sum_{iinmathbb Z}c_{i-1}$.
– Federico
Nov 19 at 18:18
It is not. The equality is achieved when summing over all possible $i$. For instance $sum_{iinmathbb Z}c_i=sum_{iinmathbb Z}c_{i-1}$.
– Federico
Nov 19 at 18:18
1
1
In both series the same terms are appearing, just shifted.
– Federico
Nov 19 at 18:18
In both series the same terms are appearing, just shifted.
– Federico
Nov 19 at 18:18
You are right, don't know why I didn't see that. Thanks
– Ramiro Scorolli
Nov 19 at 18:19
You are right, don't know why I didn't see that. Thanks
– Ramiro Scorolli
Nov 19 at 18:19
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3005267%2fb-splines-recursion%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown