Deriving definitive function of single variable from system of equations











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I have the following system of four equations:



$x_1+x_2+x_3=K$



$Acdot x_3=y$



$Bcdot x_2=y$



$Ccdot x_1=y$



From these four equations I would like to derive a function for y of A,B,C and K as such:



$f(A,B,C,K)=y$



How would I go about solving this problem?










share|cite|improve this question
























  • What does $*$ mean here?
    – Offlaw
    Nov 21 at 10:10










  • I am using ∗ as multiplier
    – Albert Werner Laursen
    Nov 21 at 10:15










  • Then substitute $x_1, x_2, x_3$ if $(A, B, C)neq (0, 0, 0)$. Otherwise, $y = 0$.
    – Offlaw
    Nov 21 at 10:19















up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I have the following system of four equations:



$x_1+x_2+x_3=K$



$Acdot x_3=y$



$Bcdot x_2=y$



$Ccdot x_1=y$



From these four equations I would like to derive a function for y of A,B,C and K as such:



$f(A,B,C,K)=y$



How would I go about solving this problem?










share|cite|improve this question
























  • What does $*$ mean here?
    – Offlaw
    Nov 21 at 10:10










  • I am using ∗ as multiplier
    – Albert Werner Laursen
    Nov 21 at 10:15










  • Then substitute $x_1, x_2, x_3$ if $(A, B, C)neq (0, 0, 0)$. Otherwise, $y = 0$.
    – Offlaw
    Nov 21 at 10:19













up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











I have the following system of four equations:



$x_1+x_2+x_3=K$



$Acdot x_3=y$



$Bcdot x_2=y$



$Ccdot x_1=y$



From these four equations I would like to derive a function for y of A,B,C and K as such:



$f(A,B,C,K)=y$



How would I go about solving this problem?










share|cite|improve this question















I have the following system of four equations:



$x_1+x_2+x_3=K$



$Acdot x_3=y$



$Bcdot x_2=y$



$Ccdot x_1=y$



From these four equations I would like to derive a function for y of A,B,C and K as such:



$f(A,B,C,K)=y$



How would I go about solving this problem?







algebra-precalculus






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Nov 21 at 10:20

























asked Nov 21 at 10:05









Albert Werner Laursen

33




33












  • What does $*$ mean here?
    – Offlaw
    Nov 21 at 10:10










  • I am using ∗ as multiplier
    – Albert Werner Laursen
    Nov 21 at 10:15










  • Then substitute $x_1, x_2, x_3$ if $(A, B, C)neq (0, 0, 0)$. Otherwise, $y = 0$.
    – Offlaw
    Nov 21 at 10:19


















  • What does $*$ mean here?
    – Offlaw
    Nov 21 at 10:10










  • I am using ∗ as multiplier
    – Albert Werner Laursen
    Nov 21 at 10:15










  • Then substitute $x_1, x_2, x_3$ if $(A, B, C)neq (0, 0, 0)$. Otherwise, $y = 0$.
    – Offlaw
    Nov 21 at 10:19
















What does $*$ mean here?
– Offlaw
Nov 21 at 10:10




What does $*$ mean here?
– Offlaw
Nov 21 at 10:10












I am using ∗ as multiplier
– Albert Werner Laursen
Nov 21 at 10:15




I am using ∗ as multiplier
– Albert Werner Laursen
Nov 21 at 10:15












Then substitute $x_1, x_2, x_3$ if $(A, B, C)neq (0, 0, 0)$. Otherwise, $y = 0$.
– Offlaw
Nov 21 at 10:19




Then substitute $x_1, x_2, x_3$ if $(A, B, C)neq (0, 0, 0)$. Otherwise, $y = 0$.
– Offlaw
Nov 21 at 10:19










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
0
down vote



accepted










Let me firstly enumerate your equalities:



$$begin{array}{cr}
x_1+x_2+x_3=K & (1)\
Acdot x_3=y & (2)\
Bcdot x_2=y & (3)\
Ccdot x_1=y & (4)end{array}$$



By multiplying (2)-(4), we obtain



$$begin{array}{cr}
Acdot B cdot C cdot x_3=B cdot C cdot y & (5)\
Acdot B cdot C cdot x_2=A cdot C cdot y & (6)\
Acdot B cdot C cdot x_1=A cdot B cdot y & (7)end{array}$$



Thus, by adding (5)-(7), we have



$$
(B cdot C + A cdot C + A cdot B)cdot y=Acdot B cdot C cdot (x_1 + x_2 + x_3) overset{(1)}{=} Acdot B cdot C cdot K quad (8)
$$



Now, we distinguish between two cases:



Case 1: $BC + AC + AB neq 0$. Then we can rearrange (8) to
$$ y = frac{ABCK}{BC + AC + AB} $$
Case 2: $BC + AC + AB = 0$. Then by (8) it follows that $ABCK = 0$, so one of $A,B,C,K$ has to be zero. If $A,B$ or $C$ are zero, then (2), (3) or (4) imply $y=0$. Otherwise, we can assume $A,B,C neq 0, K=0$.



But I have to admit: at this point I'm stuck as well. I tried to rearrange (2)-(4):
$$begin{array}{cr}
x_3=frac{y}{A} & (9)\
x_3=frac{y}{B} & (10)\
x_3=frac{y}{C} & (11)end{array}$$

So, by (1) and $K=0$: $left(frac{1}{A}+frac{1}{B}+frac{1}{C}right)y = 0$



Sadly, because $ABC neq 0$, if we divide the case-2-equation we get $frac{1}{A}+frac{1}{B}+frac{1}{C} = 0$. So at this point I don't know how to continue.



Note: This answers assumes we are working over a field.






share|cite|improve this answer





















    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3007510%2fderiving-definitive-function-of-single-variable-from-system-of-equations%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    0
    down vote



    accepted










    Let me firstly enumerate your equalities:



    $$begin{array}{cr}
    x_1+x_2+x_3=K & (1)\
    Acdot x_3=y & (2)\
    Bcdot x_2=y & (3)\
    Ccdot x_1=y & (4)end{array}$$



    By multiplying (2)-(4), we obtain



    $$begin{array}{cr}
    Acdot B cdot C cdot x_3=B cdot C cdot y & (5)\
    Acdot B cdot C cdot x_2=A cdot C cdot y & (6)\
    Acdot B cdot C cdot x_1=A cdot B cdot y & (7)end{array}$$



    Thus, by adding (5)-(7), we have



    $$
    (B cdot C + A cdot C + A cdot B)cdot y=Acdot B cdot C cdot (x_1 + x_2 + x_3) overset{(1)}{=} Acdot B cdot C cdot K quad (8)
    $$



    Now, we distinguish between two cases:



    Case 1: $BC + AC + AB neq 0$. Then we can rearrange (8) to
    $$ y = frac{ABCK}{BC + AC + AB} $$
    Case 2: $BC + AC + AB = 0$. Then by (8) it follows that $ABCK = 0$, so one of $A,B,C,K$ has to be zero. If $A,B$ or $C$ are zero, then (2), (3) or (4) imply $y=0$. Otherwise, we can assume $A,B,C neq 0, K=0$.



    But I have to admit: at this point I'm stuck as well. I tried to rearrange (2)-(4):
    $$begin{array}{cr}
    x_3=frac{y}{A} & (9)\
    x_3=frac{y}{B} & (10)\
    x_3=frac{y}{C} & (11)end{array}$$

    So, by (1) and $K=0$: $left(frac{1}{A}+frac{1}{B}+frac{1}{C}right)y = 0$



    Sadly, because $ABC neq 0$, if we divide the case-2-equation we get $frac{1}{A}+frac{1}{B}+frac{1}{C} = 0$. So at this point I don't know how to continue.



    Note: This answers assumes we are working over a field.






    share|cite|improve this answer

























      up vote
      0
      down vote



      accepted










      Let me firstly enumerate your equalities:



      $$begin{array}{cr}
      x_1+x_2+x_3=K & (1)\
      Acdot x_3=y & (2)\
      Bcdot x_2=y & (3)\
      Ccdot x_1=y & (4)end{array}$$



      By multiplying (2)-(4), we obtain



      $$begin{array}{cr}
      Acdot B cdot C cdot x_3=B cdot C cdot y & (5)\
      Acdot B cdot C cdot x_2=A cdot C cdot y & (6)\
      Acdot B cdot C cdot x_1=A cdot B cdot y & (7)end{array}$$



      Thus, by adding (5)-(7), we have



      $$
      (B cdot C + A cdot C + A cdot B)cdot y=Acdot B cdot C cdot (x_1 + x_2 + x_3) overset{(1)}{=} Acdot B cdot C cdot K quad (8)
      $$



      Now, we distinguish between two cases:



      Case 1: $BC + AC + AB neq 0$. Then we can rearrange (8) to
      $$ y = frac{ABCK}{BC + AC + AB} $$
      Case 2: $BC + AC + AB = 0$. Then by (8) it follows that $ABCK = 0$, so one of $A,B,C,K$ has to be zero. If $A,B$ or $C$ are zero, then (2), (3) or (4) imply $y=0$. Otherwise, we can assume $A,B,C neq 0, K=0$.



      But I have to admit: at this point I'm stuck as well. I tried to rearrange (2)-(4):
      $$begin{array}{cr}
      x_3=frac{y}{A} & (9)\
      x_3=frac{y}{B} & (10)\
      x_3=frac{y}{C} & (11)end{array}$$

      So, by (1) and $K=0$: $left(frac{1}{A}+frac{1}{B}+frac{1}{C}right)y = 0$



      Sadly, because $ABC neq 0$, if we divide the case-2-equation we get $frac{1}{A}+frac{1}{B}+frac{1}{C} = 0$. So at this point I don't know how to continue.



      Note: This answers assumes we are working over a field.






      share|cite|improve this answer























        up vote
        0
        down vote



        accepted







        up vote
        0
        down vote



        accepted






        Let me firstly enumerate your equalities:



        $$begin{array}{cr}
        x_1+x_2+x_3=K & (1)\
        Acdot x_3=y & (2)\
        Bcdot x_2=y & (3)\
        Ccdot x_1=y & (4)end{array}$$



        By multiplying (2)-(4), we obtain



        $$begin{array}{cr}
        Acdot B cdot C cdot x_3=B cdot C cdot y & (5)\
        Acdot B cdot C cdot x_2=A cdot C cdot y & (6)\
        Acdot B cdot C cdot x_1=A cdot B cdot y & (7)end{array}$$



        Thus, by adding (5)-(7), we have



        $$
        (B cdot C + A cdot C + A cdot B)cdot y=Acdot B cdot C cdot (x_1 + x_2 + x_3) overset{(1)}{=} Acdot B cdot C cdot K quad (8)
        $$



        Now, we distinguish between two cases:



        Case 1: $BC + AC + AB neq 0$. Then we can rearrange (8) to
        $$ y = frac{ABCK}{BC + AC + AB} $$
        Case 2: $BC + AC + AB = 0$. Then by (8) it follows that $ABCK = 0$, so one of $A,B,C,K$ has to be zero. If $A,B$ or $C$ are zero, then (2), (3) or (4) imply $y=0$. Otherwise, we can assume $A,B,C neq 0, K=0$.



        But I have to admit: at this point I'm stuck as well. I tried to rearrange (2)-(4):
        $$begin{array}{cr}
        x_3=frac{y}{A} & (9)\
        x_3=frac{y}{B} & (10)\
        x_3=frac{y}{C} & (11)end{array}$$

        So, by (1) and $K=0$: $left(frac{1}{A}+frac{1}{B}+frac{1}{C}right)y = 0$



        Sadly, because $ABC neq 0$, if we divide the case-2-equation we get $frac{1}{A}+frac{1}{B}+frac{1}{C} = 0$. So at this point I don't know how to continue.



        Note: This answers assumes we are working over a field.






        share|cite|improve this answer












        Let me firstly enumerate your equalities:



        $$begin{array}{cr}
        x_1+x_2+x_3=K & (1)\
        Acdot x_3=y & (2)\
        Bcdot x_2=y & (3)\
        Ccdot x_1=y & (4)end{array}$$



        By multiplying (2)-(4), we obtain



        $$begin{array}{cr}
        Acdot B cdot C cdot x_3=B cdot C cdot y & (5)\
        Acdot B cdot C cdot x_2=A cdot C cdot y & (6)\
        Acdot B cdot C cdot x_1=A cdot B cdot y & (7)end{array}$$



        Thus, by adding (5)-(7), we have



        $$
        (B cdot C + A cdot C + A cdot B)cdot y=Acdot B cdot C cdot (x_1 + x_2 + x_3) overset{(1)}{=} Acdot B cdot C cdot K quad (8)
        $$



        Now, we distinguish between two cases:



        Case 1: $BC + AC + AB neq 0$. Then we can rearrange (8) to
        $$ y = frac{ABCK}{BC + AC + AB} $$
        Case 2: $BC + AC + AB = 0$. Then by (8) it follows that $ABCK = 0$, so one of $A,B,C,K$ has to be zero. If $A,B$ or $C$ are zero, then (2), (3) or (4) imply $y=0$. Otherwise, we can assume $A,B,C neq 0, K=0$.



        But I have to admit: at this point I'm stuck as well. I tried to rearrange (2)-(4):
        $$begin{array}{cr}
        x_3=frac{y}{A} & (9)\
        x_3=frac{y}{B} & (10)\
        x_3=frac{y}{C} & (11)end{array}$$

        So, by (1) and $K=0$: $left(frac{1}{A}+frac{1}{B}+frac{1}{C}right)y = 0$



        Sadly, because $ABC neq 0$, if we divide the case-2-equation we get $frac{1}{A}+frac{1}{B}+frac{1}{C} = 0$. So at this point I don't know how to continue.



        Note: This answers assumes we are working over a field.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Nov 21 at 22:00









        bruderjakob17

        1386




        1386






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3007510%2fderiving-definitive-function-of-single-variable-from-system-of-equations%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Quarter-circle Tiles

            build a pushdown automaton that recognizes the reverse language of a given pushdown automaton?

            Mont Emei