Given polynomials $P$ and $Q$ of degree less than equal to $n,$ is $|PQ|leq K |P| cdot |Q|?$












0














Given polynomials $P$ and $Q$ of degree less than equal to $n,$ is $|PQ|leq K |P| cdot |Q|?$ Note that here the norm is the infinite norm and therefore $$|P| =sup_{1leq kleq n}a_k$$
where $P=sum_{i=0}^{n}a_{i}x^{i}.$



I am guessing that $|PQ|leq (n+1)(2n+1)|P|cdot |Q|$, because each term can be controlled by $|P| cdot |Q|.$ However I am not sure whether this is true. Perhaps someone could give a hint.










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 1




    Do you mean $|P| = max_{0 le i le n} |a_i|$?
    – Hans Engler
    Nov 26 '18 at 19:27
















0














Given polynomials $P$ and $Q$ of degree less than equal to $n,$ is $|PQ|leq K |P| cdot |Q|?$ Note that here the norm is the infinite norm and therefore $$|P| =sup_{1leq kleq n}a_k$$
where $P=sum_{i=0}^{n}a_{i}x^{i}.$



I am guessing that $|PQ|leq (n+1)(2n+1)|P|cdot |Q|$, because each term can be controlled by $|P| cdot |Q|.$ However I am not sure whether this is true. Perhaps someone could give a hint.










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 1




    Do you mean $|P| = max_{0 le i le n} |a_i|$?
    – Hans Engler
    Nov 26 '18 at 19:27














0












0








0







Given polynomials $P$ and $Q$ of degree less than equal to $n,$ is $|PQ|leq K |P| cdot |Q|?$ Note that here the norm is the infinite norm and therefore $$|P| =sup_{1leq kleq n}a_k$$
where $P=sum_{i=0}^{n}a_{i}x^{i}.$



I am guessing that $|PQ|leq (n+1)(2n+1)|P|cdot |Q|$, because each term can be controlled by $|P| cdot |Q|.$ However I am not sure whether this is true. Perhaps someone could give a hint.










share|cite|improve this question















Given polynomials $P$ and $Q$ of degree less than equal to $n,$ is $|PQ|leq K |P| cdot |Q|?$ Note that here the norm is the infinite norm and therefore $$|P| =sup_{1leq kleq n}a_k$$
where $P=sum_{i=0}^{n}a_{i}x^{i}.$



I am guessing that $|PQ|leq (n+1)(2n+1)|P|cdot |Q|$, because each term can be controlled by $|P| cdot |Q|.$ However I am not sure whether this is true. Perhaps someone could give a hint.







real-analysis






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Nov 26 '18 at 18:40









Henning Makholm

238k16303537




238k16303537










asked Nov 26 '18 at 18:38









Hello_World

3,82021630




3,82021630








  • 1




    Do you mean $|P| = max_{0 le i le n} |a_i|$?
    – Hans Engler
    Nov 26 '18 at 19:27














  • 1




    Do you mean $|P| = max_{0 le i le n} |a_i|$?
    – Hans Engler
    Nov 26 '18 at 19:27








1




1




Do you mean $|P| = max_{0 le i le n} |a_i|$?
– Hans Engler
Nov 26 '18 at 19:27




Do you mean $|P| = max_{0 le i le n} |a_i|$?
– Hans Engler
Nov 26 '18 at 19:27










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0














Let $P=sum_{i=0}^{n}a_{i}x^{i}, Q=sum_{i=0}^{n}b_{i}x^{i}$



$PQ=sum_{i=0}^{2n}(sum_{j=max{0, i-n}}^{min{i, n}}a_{j}cdot b_{i-j})x^{i}=sum_{i=0}^{2n}c_{i}x^{i}$



$|PQ| =sup_{0leq kleq 2n}|c_k|=max_{0leq kleq 2n}|sum_{j=max{0, k-n}}^{min{k, n}}a_{j}cdot b_{k-j}|\ leq(n+1)max_{0leq ileq n}|a_i|cdot max_{0leq jleq n}|b_j|\ =(n+1)|P|cdot|Q|$



The $(n+1)$ factor arises because the coefficient of $x^{n}$ in $PQ$ contains $n+1$ addends of the form $(a_icdot b_j)$, which is the maximum number of addends of this form for any $c_k$. It can be easily seen that the number of such addends increases progressively from $1$ to $n+1$ while calculating $c_0$ through $c_n$, and then decreases progressively to $1$. In other words, the "lengthiest" coefficent is $c_n$.






share|cite|improve this answer























    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3014738%2fgiven-polynomials-p-and-q-of-degree-less-than-equal-to-n-is-pq-leq-k%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0














    Let $P=sum_{i=0}^{n}a_{i}x^{i}, Q=sum_{i=0}^{n}b_{i}x^{i}$



    $PQ=sum_{i=0}^{2n}(sum_{j=max{0, i-n}}^{min{i, n}}a_{j}cdot b_{i-j})x^{i}=sum_{i=0}^{2n}c_{i}x^{i}$



    $|PQ| =sup_{0leq kleq 2n}|c_k|=max_{0leq kleq 2n}|sum_{j=max{0, k-n}}^{min{k, n}}a_{j}cdot b_{k-j}|\ leq(n+1)max_{0leq ileq n}|a_i|cdot max_{0leq jleq n}|b_j|\ =(n+1)|P|cdot|Q|$



    The $(n+1)$ factor arises because the coefficient of $x^{n}$ in $PQ$ contains $n+1$ addends of the form $(a_icdot b_j)$, which is the maximum number of addends of this form for any $c_k$. It can be easily seen that the number of such addends increases progressively from $1$ to $n+1$ while calculating $c_0$ through $c_n$, and then decreases progressively to $1$. In other words, the "lengthiest" coefficent is $c_n$.






    share|cite|improve this answer




























      0














      Let $P=sum_{i=0}^{n}a_{i}x^{i}, Q=sum_{i=0}^{n}b_{i}x^{i}$



      $PQ=sum_{i=0}^{2n}(sum_{j=max{0, i-n}}^{min{i, n}}a_{j}cdot b_{i-j})x^{i}=sum_{i=0}^{2n}c_{i}x^{i}$



      $|PQ| =sup_{0leq kleq 2n}|c_k|=max_{0leq kleq 2n}|sum_{j=max{0, k-n}}^{min{k, n}}a_{j}cdot b_{k-j}|\ leq(n+1)max_{0leq ileq n}|a_i|cdot max_{0leq jleq n}|b_j|\ =(n+1)|P|cdot|Q|$



      The $(n+1)$ factor arises because the coefficient of $x^{n}$ in $PQ$ contains $n+1$ addends of the form $(a_icdot b_j)$, which is the maximum number of addends of this form for any $c_k$. It can be easily seen that the number of such addends increases progressively from $1$ to $n+1$ while calculating $c_0$ through $c_n$, and then decreases progressively to $1$. In other words, the "lengthiest" coefficent is $c_n$.






      share|cite|improve this answer


























        0












        0








        0






        Let $P=sum_{i=0}^{n}a_{i}x^{i}, Q=sum_{i=0}^{n}b_{i}x^{i}$



        $PQ=sum_{i=0}^{2n}(sum_{j=max{0, i-n}}^{min{i, n}}a_{j}cdot b_{i-j})x^{i}=sum_{i=0}^{2n}c_{i}x^{i}$



        $|PQ| =sup_{0leq kleq 2n}|c_k|=max_{0leq kleq 2n}|sum_{j=max{0, k-n}}^{min{k, n}}a_{j}cdot b_{k-j}|\ leq(n+1)max_{0leq ileq n}|a_i|cdot max_{0leq jleq n}|b_j|\ =(n+1)|P|cdot|Q|$



        The $(n+1)$ factor arises because the coefficient of $x^{n}$ in $PQ$ contains $n+1$ addends of the form $(a_icdot b_j)$, which is the maximum number of addends of this form for any $c_k$. It can be easily seen that the number of such addends increases progressively from $1$ to $n+1$ while calculating $c_0$ through $c_n$, and then decreases progressively to $1$. In other words, the "lengthiest" coefficent is $c_n$.






        share|cite|improve this answer














        Let $P=sum_{i=0}^{n}a_{i}x^{i}, Q=sum_{i=0}^{n}b_{i}x^{i}$



        $PQ=sum_{i=0}^{2n}(sum_{j=max{0, i-n}}^{min{i, n}}a_{j}cdot b_{i-j})x^{i}=sum_{i=0}^{2n}c_{i}x^{i}$



        $|PQ| =sup_{0leq kleq 2n}|c_k|=max_{0leq kleq 2n}|sum_{j=max{0, k-n}}^{min{k, n}}a_{j}cdot b_{k-j}|\ leq(n+1)max_{0leq ileq n}|a_i|cdot max_{0leq jleq n}|b_j|\ =(n+1)|P|cdot|Q|$



        The $(n+1)$ factor arises because the coefficient of $x^{n}$ in $PQ$ contains $n+1$ addends of the form $(a_icdot b_j)$, which is the maximum number of addends of this form for any $c_k$. It can be easily seen that the number of such addends increases progressively from $1$ to $n+1$ while calculating $c_0$ through $c_n$, and then decreases progressively to $1$. In other words, the "lengthiest" coefficent is $c_n$.







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Nov 26 '18 at 20:12

























        answered Nov 26 '18 at 20:04









        Shubham Johri

        3,868716




        3,868716






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3014738%2fgiven-polynomials-p-and-q-of-degree-less-than-equal-to-n-is-pq-leq-k%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Mont Emei

            Province de Neuquén

            Journaliste