Given polynomials $P$ and $Q$ of degree less than equal to $n,$ is $|PQ|leq K |P| cdot |Q|?$
Given polynomials $P$ and $Q$ of degree less than equal to $n,$ is $|PQ|leq K |P| cdot |Q|?$ Note that here the norm is the infinite norm and therefore $$|P| =sup_{1leq kleq n}a_k$$
where $P=sum_{i=0}^{n}a_{i}x^{i}.$
I am guessing that $|PQ|leq (n+1)(2n+1)|P|cdot |Q|$, because each term can be controlled by $|P| cdot |Q|.$ However I am not sure whether this is true. Perhaps someone could give a hint.
real-analysis
add a comment |
Given polynomials $P$ and $Q$ of degree less than equal to $n,$ is $|PQ|leq K |P| cdot |Q|?$ Note that here the norm is the infinite norm and therefore $$|P| =sup_{1leq kleq n}a_k$$
where $P=sum_{i=0}^{n}a_{i}x^{i}.$
I am guessing that $|PQ|leq (n+1)(2n+1)|P|cdot |Q|$, because each term can be controlled by $|P| cdot |Q|.$ However I am not sure whether this is true. Perhaps someone could give a hint.
real-analysis
1
Do you mean $|P| = max_{0 le i le n} |a_i|$?
– Hans Engler
Nov 26 '18 at 19:27
add a comment |
Given polynomials $P$ and $Q$ of degree less than equal to $n,$ is $|PQ|leq K |P| cdot |Q|?$ Note that here the norm is the infinite norm and therefore $$|P| =sup_{1leq kleq n}a_k$$
where $P=sum_{i=0}^{n}a_{i}x^{i}.$
I am guessing that $|PQ|leq (n+1)(2n+1)|P|cdot |Q|$, because each term can be controlled by $|P| cdot |Q|.$ However I am not sure whether this is true. Perhaps someone could give a hint.
real-analysis
Given polynomials $P$ and $Q$ of degree less than equal to $n,$ is $|PQ|leq K |P| cdot |Q|?$ Note that here the norm is the infinite norm and therefore $$|P| =sup_{1leq kleq n}a_k$$
where $P=sum_{i=0}^{n}a_{i}x^{i}.$
I am guessing that $|PQ|leq (n+1)(2n+1)|P|cdot |Q|$, because each term can be controlled by $|P| cdot |Q|.$ However I am not sure whether this is true. Perhaps someone could give a hint.
real-analysis
real-analysis
edited Nov 26 '18 at 18:40
Henning Makholm
238k16303537
238k16303537
asked Nov 26 '18 at 18:38
Hello_World
3,82021630
3,82021630
1
Do you mean $|P| = max_{0 le i le n} |a_i|$?
– Hans Engler
Nov 26 '18 at 19:27
add a comment |
1
Do you mean $|P| = max_{0 le i le n} |a_i|$?
– Hans Engler
Nov 26 '18 at 19:27
1
1
Do you mean $|P| = max_{0 le i le n} |a_i|$?
– Hans Engler
Nov 26 '18 at 19:27
Do you mean $|P| = max_{0 le i le n} |a_i|$?
– Hans Engler
Nov 26 '18 at 19:27
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Let $P=sum_{i=0}^{n}a_{i}x^{i}, Q=sum_{i=0}^{n}b_{i}x^{i}$
$PQ=sum_{i=0}^{2n}(sum_{j=max{0, i-n}}^{min{i, n}}a_{j}cdot b_{i-j})x^{i}=sum_{i=0}^{2n}c_{i}x^{i}$
$|PQ| =sup_{0leq kleq 2n}|c_k|=max_{0leq kleq 2n}|sum_{j=max{0, k-n}}^{min{k, n}}a_{j}cdot b_{k-j}|\ leq(n+1)max_{0leq ileq n}|a_i|cdot max_{0leq jleq n}|b_j|\ =(n+1)|P|cdot|Q|$
The $(n+1)$ factor arises because the coefficient of $x^{n}$ in $PQ$ contains $n+1$ addends of the form $(a_icdot b_j)$, which is the maximum number of addends of this form for any $c_k$. It can be easily seen that the number of such addends increases progressively from $1$ to $n+1$ while calculating $c_0$ through $c_n$, and then decreases progressively to $1$. In other words, the "lengthiest" coefficent is $c_n$.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3014738%2fgiven-polynomials-p-and-q-of-degree-less-than-equal-to-n-is-pq-leq-k%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Let $P=sum_{i=0}^{n}a_{i}x^{i}, Q=sum_{i=0}^{n}b_{i}x^{i}$
$PQ=sum_{i=0}^{2n}(sum_{j=max{0, i-n}}^{min{i, n}}a_{j}cdot b_{i-j})x^{i}=sum_{i=0}^{2n}c_{i}x^{i}$
$|PQ| =sup_{0leq kleq 2n}|c_k|=max_{0leq kleq 2n}|sum_{j=max{0, k-n}}^{min{k, n}}a_{j}cdot b_{k-j}|\ leq(n+1)max_{0leq ileq n}|a_i|cdot max_{0leq jleq n}|b_j|\ =(n+1)|P|cdot|Q|$
The $(n+1)$ factor arises because the coefficient of $x^{n}$ in $PQ$ contains $n+1$ addends of the form $(a_icdot b_j)$, which is the maximum number of addends of this form for any $c_k$. It can be easily seen that the number of such addends increases progressively from $1$ to $n+1$ while calculating $c_0$ through $c_n$, and then decreases progressively to $1$. In other words, the "lengthiest" coefficent is $c_n$.
add a comment |
Let $P=sum_{i=0}^{n}a_{i}x^{i}, Q=sum_{i=0}^{n}b_{i}x^{i}$
$PQ=sum_{i=0}^{2n}(sum_{j=max{0, i-n}}^{min{i, n}}a_{j}cdot b_{i-j})x^{i}=sum_{i=0}^{2n}c_{i}x^{i}$
$|PQ| =sup_{0leq kleq 2n}|c_k|=max_{0leq kleq 2n}|sum_{j=max{0, k-n}}^{min{k, n}}a_{j}cdot b_{k-j}|\ leq(n+1)max_{0leq ileq n}|a_i|cdot max_{0leq jleq n}|b_j|\ =(n+1)|P|cdot|Q|$
The $(n+1)$ factor arises because the coefficient of $x^{n}$ in $PQ$ contains $n+1$ addends of the form $(a_icdot b_j)$, which is the maximum number of addends of this form for any $c_k$. It can be easily seen that the number of such addends increases progressively from $1$ to $n+1$ while calculating $c_0$ through $c_n$, and then decreases progressively to $1$. In other words, the "lengthiest" coefficent is $c_n$.
add a comment |
Let $P=sum_{i=0}^{n}a_{i}x^{i}, Q=sum_{i=0}^{n}b_{i}x^{i}$
$PQ=sum_{i=0}^{2n}(sum_{j=max{0, i-n}}^{min{i, n}}a_{j}cdot b_{i-j})x^{i}=sum_{i=0}^{2n}c_{i}x^{i}$
$|PQ| =sup_{0leq kleq 2n}|c_k|=max_{0leq kleq 2n}|sum_{j=max{0, k-n}}^{min{k, n}}a_{j}cdot b_{k-j}|\ leq(n+1)max_{0leq ileq n}|a_i|cdot max_{0leq jleq n}|b_j|\ =(n+1)|P|cdot|Q|$
The $(n+1)$ factor arises because the coefficient of $x^{n}$ in $PQ$ contains $n+1$ addends of the form $(a_icdot b_j)$, which is the maximum number of addends of this form for any $c_k$. It can be easily seen that the number of such addends increases progressively from $1$ to $n+1$ while calculating $c_0$ through $c_n$, and then decreases progressively to $1$. In other words, the "lengthiest" coefficent is $c_n$.
Let $P=sum_{i=0}^{n}a_{i}x^{i}, Q=sum_{i=0}^{n}b_{i}x^{i}$
$PQ=sum_{i=0}^{2n}(sum_{j=max{0, i-n}}^{min{i, n}}a_{j}cdot b_{i-j})x^{i}=sum_{i=0}^{2n}c_{i}x^{i}$
$|PQ| =sup_{0leq kleq 2n}|c_k|=max_{0leq kleq 2n}|sum_{j=max{0, k-n}}^{min{k, n}}a_{j}cdot b_{k-j}|\ leq(n+1)max_{0leq ileq n}|a_i|cdot max_{0leq jleq n}|b_j|\ =(n+1)|P|cdot|Q|$
The $(n+1)$ factor arises because the coefficient of $x^{n}$ in $PQ$ contains $n+1$ addends of the form $(a_icdot b_j)$, which is the maximum number of addends of this form for any $c_k$. It can be easily seen that the number of such addends increases progressively from $1$ to $n+1$ while calculating $c_0$ through $c_n$, and then decreases progressively to $1$. In other words, the "lengthiest" coefficent is $c_n$.
edited Nov 26 '18 at 20:12
answered Nov 26 '18 at 20:04
Shubham Johri
3,868716
3,868716
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3014738%2fgiven-polynomials-p-and-q-of-degree-less-than-equal-to-n-is-pq-leq-k%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
Do you mean $|P| = max_{0 le i le n} |a_i|$?
– Hans Engler
Nov 26 '18 at 19:27