How to show that the following norms are equivalent?
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Let $f in C^1[0, 1]$. Then show that the norms
$$|f| =int_0^1|f(t)|, dt+max_{t in [0, 1]}|f'(t)|$$ and $$|f|= max_{t in [0, 1]}|f(t)|+max_{t in [0, 1]}|f'(t)|$$ are equivalent.
I have shown that $|f| leq |f|$. How to show that $|f| leq K |f|$ for some constant K?
norm lp-spaces
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Let $f in C^1[0, 1]$. Then show that the norms
$$|f| =int_0^1|f(t)|, dt+max_{t in [0, 1]}|f'(t)|$$ and $$|f|= max_{t in [0, 1]}|f(t)|+max_{t in [0, 1]}|f'(t)|$$ are equivalent.
I have shown that $|f| leq |f|$. How to show that $|f| leq K |f|$ for some constant K?
norm lp-spaces
1
The first "norm" is not a norm, please put the modulus inside the integral.
– dan_fulea
Nov 23 at 10:54
The idea is, I think, that if $max|f(t)|$ is much larger than $int |f(t)|dt$, then $max|f'(t)|$ must be large.
– Arthur
Nov 23 at 10:55
Looks like Mean Value Thm
– Richard Martin
Nov 23 at 10:55
what have you tried?
– supinf
Nov 23 at 10:57
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Let $f in C^1[0, 1]$. Then show that the norms
$$|f| =int_0^1|f(t)|, dt+max_{t in [0, 1]}|f'(t)|$$ and $$|f|= max_{t in [0, 1]}|f(t)|+max_{t in [0, 1]}|f'(t)|$$ are equivalent.
I have shown that $|f| leq |f|$. How to show that $|f| leq K |f|$ for some constant K?
norm lp-spaces
Let $f in C^1[0, 1]$. Then show that the norms
$$|f| =int_0^1|f(t)|, dt+max_{t in [0, 1]}|f'(t)|$$ and $$|f|= max_{t in [0, 1]}|f(t)|+max_{t in [0, 1]}|f'(t)|$$ are equivalent.
I have shown that $|f| leq |f|$. How to show that $|f| leq K |f|$ for some constant K?
norm lp-spaces
norm lp-spaces
edited Nov 23 at 10:55
José Carlos Santos
147k22117218
147k22117218
asked Nov 23 at 10:51
Mittal G
1,192515
1,192515
1
The first "norm" is not a norm, please put the modulus inside the integral.
– dan_fulea
Nov 23 at 10:54
The idea is, I think, that if $max|f(t)|$ is much larger than $int |f(t)|dt$, then $max|f'(t)|$ must be large.
– Arthur
Nov 23 at 10:55
Looks like Mean Value Thm
– Richard Martin
Nov 23 at 10:55
what have you tried?
– supinf
Nov 23 at 10:57
add a comment |
1
The first "norm" is not a norm, please put the modulus inside the integral.
– dan_fulea
Nov 23 at 10:54
The idea is, I think, that if $max|f(t)|$ is much larger than $int |f(t)|dt$, then $max|f'(t)|$ must be large.
– Arthur
Nov 23 at 10:55
Looks like Mean Value Thm
– Richard Martin
Nov 23 at 10:55
what have you tried?
– supinf
Nov 23 at 10:57
1
1
The first "norm" is not a norm, please put the modulus inside the integral.
– dan_fulea
Nov 23 at 10:54
The first "norm" is not a norm, please put the modulus inside the integral.
– dan_fulea
Nov 23 at 10:54
The idea is, I think, that if $max|f(t)|$ is much larger than $int |f(t)|dt$, then $max|f'(t)|$ must be large.
– Arthur
Nov 23 at 10:55
The idea is, I think, that if $max|f(t)|$ is much larger than $int |f(t)|dt$, then $max|f'(t)|$ must be large.
– Arthur
Nov 23 at 10:55
Looks like Mean Value Thm
– Richard Martin
Nov 23 at 10:55
Looks like Mean Value Thm
– Richard Martin
Nov 23 at 10:55
what have you tried?
– supinf
Nov 23 at 10:57
what have you tried?
– supinf
Nov 23 at 10:57
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
Suppose that$$lvert frvertleqslant1.tag1$$Then$$displaystylemax_{tin[0,1]}bigllvert f'(t)bigrrvertleqslant1.tag2$$Suppose that $displaystylemax_{tin[0,1]}bigllvert f(t)bigrrvert>2$. Then, by $(2)$ and by the Mean Value Theorem, $displaystylemin_{tin[0,1]}bigllvert f(t)bigrrvert>1$ and so $displaystyleint_0^1bigllvert f(t)bigrrvert,mathrm dt>1$. This is impossible, since we are assuming $(1)$. This proves that $lvert frvertleqslant1implieslVert frVertleqslant2$. Can you take it from here?
What is the value of $K$?
– Mittal G
Nov 23 at 11:28
1
@MittalG $K=2$ will do.
– José Carlos Santos
Nov 23 at 11:29
@ José Carlos Santos Also what about other cases i.e. when $|f| > 1$?
– Mittal G
Nov 23 at 11:30
1
If $lvert frvert=Mneq0$, then $leftlvertfrac fMrightrvert=1$. So, $leftlVertfrac fMrightrVertleqslant2$, and therefore $lVert frVertleqslant2M$.
– José Carlos Santos
Nov 23 at 11:32
Great. Thanks a lot.
– Mittal G
Nov 23 at 11:38
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Let $f$ be a function in the given space. It reaches the minimal and the maximal values, $m$ and $M$ say, at two points $a,b$ say inside $I=[0,1]$. Then the (only) term we have to control using $int_I |f(x)|; dx$ and $|f'|_infty$ is $|f|_infty=max(|m|,|M|)$.
In the case $m,M$ have the same sign, we may and do assume (after possibly passing from $f$ to $-f$) $0le mle M$. Then
$$ M
=m+(M-m)le int_I|f(x)|; dx+|f'(xi)|,|b-a|le |f| .
$$
In the remained case $mle 0le M$ we find an intermediate $c$ between $a$, $b$ with $f(c)=0$. So
$$
begin{aligned}
|M| &= (M-0) = |f'(xi_1)|,|b-c|le |f'|_infty le |f| , \
|m| &= (0-m) = |f'(xi_2)|,|c-a|le |f'|_infty le |f| .
end{aligned}
$$
Summing up:
$$
|f| =|f|_infty + |f'|_infty le |f| + |f'|_infty le |f|+|f|= 2|f| .
$$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3010219%2fhow-to-show-that-the-following-norms-are-equivalent%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
Suppose that$$lvert frvertleqslant1.tag1$$Then$$displaystylemax_{tin[0,1]}bigllvert f'(t)bigrrvertleqslant1.tag2$$Suppose that $displaystylemax_{tin[0,1]}bigllvert f(t)bigrrvert>2$. Then, by $(2)$ and by the Mean Value Theorem, $displaystylemin_{tin[0,1]}bigllvert f(t)bigrrvert>1$ and so $displaystyleint_0^1bigllvert f(t)bigrrvert,mathrm dt>1$. This is impossible, since we are assuming $(1)$. This proves that $lvert frvertleqslant1implieslVert frVertleqslant2$. Can you take it from here?
What is the value of $K$?
– Mittal G
Nov 23 at 11:28
1
@MittalG $K=2$ will do.
– José Carlos Santos
Nov 23 at 11:29
@ José Carlos Santos Also what about other cases i.e. when $|f| > 1$?
– Mittal G
Nov 23 at 11:30
1
If $lvert frvert=Mneq0$, then $leftlvertfrac fMrightrvert=1$. So, $leftlVertfrac fMrightrVertleqslant2$, and therefore $lVert frVertleqslant2M$.
– José Carlos Santos
Nov 23 at 11:32
Great. Thanks a lot.
– Mittal G
Nov 23 at 11:38
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
Suppose that$$lvert frvertleqslant1.tag1$$Then$$displaystylemax_{tin[0,1]}bigllvert f'(t)bigrrvertleqslant1.tag2$$Suppose that $displaystylemax_{tin[0,1]}bigllvert f(t)bigrrvert>2$. Then, by $(2)$ and by the Mean Value Theorem, $displaystylemin_{tin[0,1]}bigllvert f(t)bigrrvert>1$ and so $displaystyleint_0^1bigllvert f(t)bigrrvert,mathrm dt>1$. This is impossible, since we are assuming $(1)$. This proves that $lvert frvertleqslant1implieslVert frVertleqslant2$. Can you take it from here?
What is the value of $K$?
– Mittal G
Nov 23 at 11:28
1
@MittalG $K=2$ will do.
– José Carlos Santos
Nov 23 at 11:29
@ José Carlos Santos Also what about other cases i.e. when $|f| > 1$?
– Mittal G
Nov 23 at 11:30
1
If $lvert frvert=Mneq0$, then $leftlvertfrac fMrightrvert=1$. So, $leftlVertfrac fMrightrVertleqslant2$, and therefore $lVert frVertleqslant2M$.
– José Carlos Santos
Nov 23 at 11:32
Great. Thanks a lot.
– Mittal G
Nov 23 at 11:38
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
Suppose that$$lvert frvertleqslant1.tag1$$Then$$displaystylemax_{tin[0,1]}bigllvert f'(t)bigrrvertleqslant1.tag2$$Suppose that $displaystylemax_{tin[0,1]}bigllvert f(t)bigrrvert>2$. Then, by $(2)$ and by the Mean Value Theorem, $displaystylemin_{tin[0,1]}bigllvert f(t)bigrrvert>1$ and so $displaystyleint_0^1bigllvert f(t)bigrrvert,mathrm dt>1$. This is impossible, since we are assuming $(1)$. This proves that $lvert frvertleqslant1implieslVert frVertleqslant2$. Can you take it from here?
Suppose that$$lvert frvertleqslant1.tag1$$Then$$displaystylemax_{tin[0,1]}bigllvert f'(t)bigrrvertleqslant1.tag2$$Suppose that $displaystylemax_{tin[0,1]}bigllvert f(t)bigrrvert>2$. Then, by $(2)$ and by the Mean Value Theorem, $displaystylemin_{tin[0,1]}bigllvert f(t)bigrrvert>1$ and so $displaystyleint_0^1bigllvert f(t)bigrrvert,mathrm dt>1$. This is impossible, since we are assuming $(1)$. This proves that $lvert frvertleqslant1implieslVert frVertleqslant2$. Can you take it from here?
answered Nov 23 at 11:04
José Carlos Santos
147k22117218
147k22117218
What is the value of $K$?
– Mittal G
Nov 23 at 11:28
1
@MittalG $K=2$ will do.
– José Carlos Santos
Nov 23 at 11:29
@ José Carlos Santos Also what about other cases i.e. when $|f| > 1$?
– Mittal G
Nov 23 at 11:30
1
If $lvert frvert=Mneq0$, then $leftlvertfrac fMrightrvert=1$. So, $leftlVertfrac fMrightrVertleqslant2$, and therefore $lVert frVertleqslant2M$.
– José Carlos Santos
Nov 23 at 11:32
Great. Thanks a lot.
– Mittal G
Nov 23 at 11:38
add a comment |
What is the value of $K$?
– Mittal G
Nov 23 at 11:28
1
@MittalG $K=2$ will do.
– José Carlos Santos
Nov 23 at 11:29
@ José Carlos Santos Also what about other cases i.e. when $|f| > 1$?
– Mittal G
Nov 23 at 11:30
1
If $lvert frvert=Mneq0$, then $leftlvertfrac fMrightrvert=1$. So, $leftlVertfrac fMrightrVertleqslant2$, and therefore $lVert frVertleqslant2M$.
– José Carlos Santos
Nov 23 at 11:32
Great. Thanks a lot.
– Mittal G
Nov 23 at 11:38
What is the value of $K$?
– Mittal G
Nov 23 at 11:28
What is the value of $K$?
– Mittal G
Nov 23 at 11:28
1
1
@MittalG $K=2$ will do.
– José Carlos Santos
Nov 23 at 11:29
@MittalG $K=2$ will do.
– José Carlos Santos
Nov 23 at 11:29
@ José Carlos Santos Also what about other cases i.e. when $|f| > 1$?
– Mittal G
Nov 23 at 11:30
@ José Carlos Santos Also what about other cases i.e. when $|f| > 1$?
– Mittal G
Nov 23 at 11:30
1
1
If $lvert frvert=Mneq0$, then $leftlvertfrac fMrightrvert=1$. So, $leftlVertfrac fMrightrVertleqslant2$, and therefore $lVert frVertleqslant2M$.
– José Carlos Santos
Nov 23 at 11:32
If $lvert frvert=Mneq0$, then $leftlvertfrac fMrightrvert=1$. So, $leftlVertfrac fMrightrVertleqslant2$, and therefore $lVert frVertleqslant2M$.
– José Carlos Santos
Nov 23 at 11:32
Great. Thanks a lot.
– Mittal G
Nov 23 at 11:38
Great. Thanks a lot.
– Mittal G
Nov 23 at 11:38
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Let $f$ be a function in the given space. It reaches the minimal and the maximal values, $m$ and $M$ say, at two points $a,b$ say inside $I=[0,1]$. Then the (only) term we have to control using $int_I |f(x)|; dx$ and $|f'|_infty$ is $|f|_infty=max(|m|,|M|)$.
In the case $m,M$ have the same sign, we may and do assume (after possibly passing from $f$ to $-f$) $0le mle M$. Then
$$ M
=m+(M-m)le int_I|f(x)|; dx+|f'(xi)|,|b-a|le |f| .
$$
In the remained case $mle 0le M$ we find an intermediate $c$ between $a$, $b$ with $f(c)=0$. So
$$
begin{aligned}
|M| &= (M-0) = |f'(xi_1)|,|b-c|le |f'|_infty le |f| , \
|m| &= (0-m) = |f'(xi_2)|,|c-a|le |f'|_infty le |f| .
end{aligned}
$$
Summing up:
$$
|f| =|f|_infty + |f'|_infty le |f| + |f'|_infty le |f|+|f|= 2|f| .
$$
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Let $f$ be a function in the given space. It reaches the minimal and the maximal values, $m$ and $M$ say, at two points $a,b$ say inside $I=[0,1]$. Then the (only) term we have to control using $int_I |f(x)|; dx$ and $|f'|_infty$ is $|f|_infty=max(|m|,|M|)$.
In the case $m,M$ have the same sign, we may and do assume (after possibly passing from $f$ to $-f$) $0le mle M$. Then
$$ M
=m+(M-m)le int_I|f(x)|; dx+|f'(xi)|,|b-a|le |f| .
$$
In the remained case $mle 0le M$ we find an intermediate $c$ between $a$, $b$ with $f(c)=0$. So
$$
begin{aligned}
|M| &= (M-0) = |f'(xi_1)|,|b-c|le |f'|_infty le |f| , \
|m| &= (0-m) = |f'(xi_2)|,|c-a|le |f'|_infty le |f| .
end{aligned}
$$
Summing up:
$$
|f| =|f|_infty + |f'|_infty le |f| + |f'|_infty le |f|+|f|= 2|f| .
$$
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
Let $f$ be a function in the given space. It reaches the minimal and the maximal values, $m$ and $M$ say, at two points $a,b$ say inside $I=[0,1]$. Then the (only) term we have to control using $int_I |f(x)|; dx$ and $|f'|_infty$ is $|f|_infty=max(|m|,|M|)$.
In the case $m,M$ have the same sign, we may and do assume (after possibly passing from $f$ to $-f$) $0le mle M$. Then
$$ M
=m+(M-m)le int_I|f(x)|; dx+|f'(xi)|,|b-a|le |f| .
$$
In the remained case $mle 0le M$ we find an intermediate $c$ between $a$, $b$ with $f(c)=0$. So
$$
begin{aligned}
|M| &= (M-0) = |f'(xi_1)|,|b-c|le |f'|_infty le |f| , \
|m| &= (0-m) = |f'(xi_2)|,|c-a|le |f'|_infty le |f| .
end{aligned}
$$
Summing up:
$$
|f| =|f|_infty + |f'|_infty le |f| + |f'|_infty le |f|+|f|= 2|f| .
$$
Let $f$ be a function in the given space. It reaches the minimal and the maximal values, $m$ and $M$ say, at two points $a,b$ say inside $I=[0,1]$. Then the (only) term we have to control using $int_I |f(x)|; dx$ and $|f'|_infty$ is $|f|_infty=max(|m|,|M|)$.
In the case $m,M$ have the same sign, we may and do assume (after possibly passing from $f$ to $-f$) $0le mle M$. Then
$$ M
=m+(M-m)le int_I|f(x)|; dx+|f'(xi)|,|b-a|le |f| .
$$
In the remained case $mle 0le M$ we find an intermediate $c$ between $a$, $b$ with $f(c)=0$. So
$$
begin{aligned}
|M| &= (M-0) = |f'(xi_1)|,|b-c|le |f'|_infty le |f| , \
|m| &= (0-m) = |f'(xi_2)|,|c-a|le |f'|_infty le |f| .
end{aligned}
$$
Summing up:
$$
|f| =|f|_infty + |f'|_infty le |f| + |f'|_infty le |f|+|f|= 2|f| .
$$
answered Nov 23 at 17:40
dan_fulea
6,2401312
6,2401312
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3010219%2fhow-to-show-that-the-following-norms-are-equivalent%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
The first "norm" is not a norm, please put the modulus inside the integral.
– dan_fulea
Nov 23 at 10:54
The idea is, I think, that if $max|f(t)|$ is much larger than $int |f(t)|dt$, then $max|f'(t)|$ must be large.
– Arthur
Nov 23 at 10:55
Looks like Mean Value Thm
– Richard Martin
Nov 23 at 10:55
what have you tried?
– supinf
Nov 23 at 10:57