How to show that the following norms are equivalent?











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












Let $f in C^1[0, 1]$. Then show that the norms
$$|f| =int_0^1|f(t)|, dt+max_{t in [0, 1]}|f'(t)|$$ and $$|f|= max_{t in [0, 1]}|f(t)|+max_{t in [0, 1]}|f'(t)|$$ are equivalent.



I have shown that $|f| leq |f|$. How to show that $|f| leq K |f|$ for some constant K?










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 1




    The first "norm" is not a norm, please put the modulus inside the integral.
    – dan_fulea
    Nov 23 at 10:54










  • The idea is, I think, that if $max|f(t)|$ is much larger than $int |f(t)|dt$, then $max|f'(t)|$ must be large.
    – Arthur
    Nov 23 at 10:55










  • Looks like Mean Value Thm
    – Richard Martin
    Nov 23 at 10:55










  • what have you tried?
    – supinf
    Nov 23 at 10:57















up vote
0
down vote

favorite












Let $f in C^1[0, 1]$. Then show that the norms
$$|f| =int_0^1|f(t)|, dt+max_{t in [0, 1]}|f'(t)|$$ and $$|f|= max_{t in [0, 1]}|f(t)|+max_{t in [0, 1]}|f'(t)|$$ are equivalent.



I have shown that $|f| leq |f|$. How to show that $|f| leq K |f|$ for some constant K?










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 1




    The first "norm" is not a norm, please put the modulus inside the integral.
    – dan_fulea
    Nov 23 at 10:54










  • The idea is, I think, that if $max|f(t)|$ is much larger than $int |f(t)|dt$, then $max|f'(t)|$ must be large.
    – Arthur
    Nov 23 at 10:55










  • Looks like Mean Value Thm
    – Richard Martin
    Nov 23 at 10:55










  • what have you tried?
    – supinf
    Nov 23 at 10:57













up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











Let $f in C^1[0, 1]$. Then show that the norms
$$|f| =int_0^1|f(t)|, dt+max_{t in [0, 1]}|f'(t)|$$ and $$|f|= max_{t in [0, 1]}|f(t)|+max_{t in [0, 1]}|f'(t)|$$ are equivalent.



I have shown that $|f| leq |f|$. How to show that $|f| leq K |f|$ for some constant K?










share|cite|improve this question















Let $f in C^1[0, 1]$. Then show that the norms
$$|f| =int_0^1|f(t)|, dt+max_{t in [0, 1]}|f'(t)|$$ and $$|f|= max_{t in [0, 1]}|f(t)|+max_{t in [0, 1]}|f'(t)|$$ are equivalent.



I have shown that $|f| leq |f|$. How to show that $|f| leq K |f|$ for some constant K?







norm lp-spaces






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Nov 23 at 10:55









José Carlos Santos

147k22117218




147k22117218










asked Nov 23 at 10:51









Mittal G

1,192515




1,192515








  • 1




    The first "norm" is not a norm, please put the modulus inside the integral.
    – dan_fulea
    Nov 23 at 10:54










  • The idea is, I think, that if $max|f(t)|$ is much larger than $int |f(t)|dt$, then $max|f'(t)|$ must be large.
    – Arthur
    Nov 23 at 10:55










  • Looks like Mean Value Thm
    – Richard Martin
    Nov 23 at 10:55










  • what have you tried?
    – supinf
    Nov 23 at 10:57














  • 1




    The first "norm" is not a norm, please put the modulus inside the integral.
    – dan_fulea
    Nov 23 at 10:54










  • The idea is, I think, that if $max|f(t)|$ is much larger than $int |f(t)|dt$, then $max|f'(t)|$ must be large.
    – Arthur
    Nov 23 at 10:55










  • Looks like Mean Value Thm
    – Richard Martin
    Nov 23 at 10:55










  • what have you tried?
    – supinf
    Nov 23 at 10:57








1




1




The first "norm" is not a norm, please put the modulus inside the integral.
– dan_fulea
Nov 23 at 10:54




The first "norm" is not a norm, please put the modulus inside the integral.
– dan_fulea
Nov 23 at 10:54












The idea is, I think, that if $max|f(t)|$ is much larger than $int |f(t)|dt$, then $max|f'(t)|$ must be large.
– Arthur
Nov 23 at 10:55




The idea is, I think, that if $max|f(t)|$ is much larger than $int |f(t)|dt$, then $max|f'(t)|$ must be large.
– Arthur
Nov 23 at 10:55












Looks like Mean Value Thm
– Richard Martin
Nov 23 at 10:55




Looks like Mean Value Thm
– Richard Martin
Nov 23 at 10:55












what have you tried?
– supinf
Nov 23 at 10:57




what have you tried?
– supinf
Nov 23 at 10:57










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
2
down vote



accepted










Suppose that$$lvert frvertleqslant1.tag1$$Then$$displaystylemax_{tin[0,1]}bigllvert f'(t)bigrrvertleqslant1.tag2$$Suppose that $displaystylemax_{tin[0,1]}bigllvert f(t)bigrrvert>2$. Then, by $(2)$ and by the Mean Value Theorem, $displaystylemin_{tin[0,1]}bigllvert f(t)bigrrvert>1$ and so $displaystyleint_0^1bigllvert f(t)bigrrvert,mathrm dt>1$. This is impossible, since we are assuming $(1)$. This proves that $lvert frvertleqslant1implieslVert frVertleqslant2$. Can you take it from here?






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • What is the value of $K$?
    – Mittal G
    Nov 23 at 11:28






  • 1




    @MittalG $K=2$ will do.
    – José Carlos Santos
    Nov 23 at 11:29










  • @ José Carlos Santos Also what about other cases i.e. when $|f| > 1$?
    – Mittal G
    Nov 23 at 11:30








  • 1




    If $lvert frvert=Mneq0$, then $leftlvertfrac fMrightrvert=1$. So, $leftlVertfrac fMrightrVertleqslant2$, and therefore $lVert frVertleqslant2M$.
    – José Carlos Santos
    Nov 23 at 11:32










  • Great. Thanks a lot.
    – Mittal G
    Nov 23 at 11:38


















up vote
0
down vote













Let $f$ be a function in the given space. It reaches the minimal and the maximal values, $m$ and $M$ say, at two points $a,b$ say inside $I=[0,1]$. Then the (only) term we have to control using $int_I |f(x)|; dx$ and $|f'|_infty$ is $|f|_infty=max(|m|,|M|)$.



In the case $m,M$ have the same sign, we may and do assume (after possibly passing from $f$ to $-f$) $0le mle M$. Then
$$ M
=m+(M-m)le int_I|f(x)|; dx+|f'(xi)|,|b-a|le |f| .
$$

In the remained case $mle 0le M$ we find an intermediate $c$ between $a$, $b$ with $f(c)=0$. So
$$
begin{aligned}
|M| &= (M-0) = |f'(xi_1)|,|b-c|le |f'|_infty le |f| , \
|m| &= (0-m) = |f'(xi_2)|,|c-a|le |f'|_infty le |f| .
end{aligned}
$$

Summing up:
$$
|f| =|f|_infty + |f'|_infty le |f| + |f'|_infty le |f|+|f|= 2|f| .
$$






share|cite|improve this answer





















    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3010219%2fhow-to-show-that-the-following-norms-are-equivalent%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    2
    down vote



    accepted










    Suppose that$$lvert frvertleqslant1.tag1$$Then$$displaystylemax_{tin[0,1]}bigllvert f'(t)bigrrvertleqslant1.tag2$$Suppose that $displaystylemax_{tin[0,1]}bigllvert f(t)bigrrvert>2$. Then, by $(2)$ and by the Mean Value Theorem, $displaystylemin_{tin[0,1]}bigllvert f(t)bigrrvert>1$ and so $displaystyleint_0^1bigllvert f(t)bigrrvert,mathrm dt>1$. This is impossible, since we are assuming $(1)$. This proves that $lvert frvertleqslant1implieslVert frVertleqslant2$. Can you take it from here?






    share|cite|improve this answer





















    • What is the value of $K$?
      – Mittal G
      Nov 23 at 11:28






    • 1




      @MittalG $K=2$ will do.
      – José Carlos Santos
      Nov 23 at 11:29










    • @ José Carlos Santos Also what about other cases i.e. when $|f| > 1$?
      – Mittal G
      Nov 23 at 11:30








    • 1




      If $lvert frvert=Mneq0$, then $leftlvertfrac fMrightrvert=1$. So, $leftlVertfrac fMrightrVertleqslant2$, and therefore $lVert frVertleqslant2M$.
      – José Carlos Santos
      Nov 23 at 11:32










    • Great. Thanks a lot.
      – Mittal G
      Nov 23 at 11:38















    up vote
    2
    down vote



    accepted










    Suppose that$$lvert frvertleqslant1.tag1$$Then$$displaystylemax_{tin[0,1]}bigllvert f'(t)bigrrvertleqslant1.tag2$$Suppose that $displaystylemax_{tin[0,1]}bigllvert f(t)bigrrvert>2$. Then, by $(2)$ and by the Mean Value Theorem, $displaystylemin_{tin[0,1]}bigllvert f(t)bigrrvert>1$ and so $displaystyleint_0^1bigllvert f(t)bigrrvert,mathrm dt>1$. This is impossible, since we are assuming $(1)$. This proves that $lvert frvertleqslant1implieslVert frVertleqslant2$. Can you take it from here?






    share|cite|improve this answer





















    • What is the value of $K$?
      – Mittal G
      Nov 23 at 11:28






    • 1




      @MittalG $K=2$ will do.
      – José Carlos Santos
      Nov 23 at 11:29










    • @ José Carlos Santos Also what about other cases i.e. when $|f| > 1$?
      – Mittal G
      Nov 23 at 11:30








    • 1




      If $lvert frvert=Mneq0$, then $leftlvertfrac fMrightrvert=1$. So, $leftlVertfrac fMrightrVertleqslant2$, and therefore $lVert frVertleqslant2M$.
      – José Carlos Santos
      Nov 23 at 11:32










    • Great. Thanks a lot.
      – Mittal G
      Nov 23 at 11:38













    up vote
    2
    down vote



    accepted







    up vote
    2
    down vote



    accepted






    Suppose that$$lvert frvertleqslant1.tag1$$Then$$displaystylemax_{tin[0,1]}bigllvert f'(t)bigrrvertleqslant1.tag2$$Suppose that $displaystylemax_{tin[0,1]}bigllvert f(t)bigrrvert>2$. Then, by $(2)$ and by the Mean Value Theorem, $displaystylemin_{tin[0,1]}bigllvert f(t)bigrrvert>1$ and so $displaystyleint_0^1bigllvert f(t)bigrrvert,mathrm dt>1$. This is impossible, since we are assuming $(1)$. This proves that $lvert frvertleqslant1implieslVert frVertleqslant2$. Can you take it from here?






    share|cite|improve this answer












    Suppose that$$lvert frvertleqslant1.tag1$$Then$$displaystylemax_{tin[0,1]}bigllvert f'(t)bigrrvertleqslant1.tag2$$Suppose that $displaystylemax_{tin[0,1]}bigllvert f(t)bigrrvert>2$. Then, by $(2)$ and by the Mean Value Theorem, $displaystylemin_{tin[0,1]}bigllvert f(t)bigrrvert>1$ and so $displaystyleint_0^1bigllvert f(t)bigrrvert,mathrm dt>1$. This is impossible, since we are assuming $(1)$. This proves that $lvert frvertleqslant1implieslVert frVertleqslant2$. Can you take it from here?







    share|cite|improve this answer












    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer










    answered Nov 23 at 11:04









    José Carlos Santos

    147k22117218




    147k22117218












    • What is the value of $K$?
      – Mittal G
      Nov 23 at 11:28






    • 1




      @MittalG $K=2$ will do.
      – José Carlos Santos
      Nov 23 at 11:29










    • @ José Carlos Santos Also what about other cases i.e. when $|f| > 1$?
      – Mittal G
      Nov 23 at 11:30








    • 1




      If $lvert frvert=Mneq0$, then $leftlvertfrac fMrightrvert=1$. So, $leftlVertfrac fMrightrVertleqslant2$, and therefore $lVert frVertleqslant2M$.
      – José Carlos Santos
      Nov 23 at 11:32










    • Great. Thanks a lot.
      – Mittal G
      Nov 23 at 11:38


















    • What is the value of $K$?
      – Mittal G
      Nov 23 at 11:28






    • 1




      @MittalG $K=2$ will do.
      – José Carlos Santos
      Nov 23 at 11:29










    • @ José Carlos Santos Also what about other cases i.e. when $|f| > 1$?
      – Mittal G
      Nov 23 at 11:30








    • 1




      If $lvert frvert=Mneq0$, then $leftlvertfrac fMrightrvert=1$. So, $leftlVertfrac fMrightrVertleqslant2$, and therefore $lVert frVertleqslant2M$.
      – José Carlos Santos
      Nov 23 at 11:32










    • Great. Thanks a lot.
      – Mittal G
      Nov 23 at 11:38
















    What is the value of $K$?
    – Mittal G
    Nov 23 at 11:28




    What is the value of $K$?
    – Mittal G
    Nov 23 at 11:28




    1




    1




    @MittalG $K=2$ will do.
    – José Carlos Santos
    Nov 23 at 11:29




    @MittalG $K=2$ will do.
    – José Carlos Santos
    Nov 23 at 11:29












    @ José Carlos Santos Also what about other cases i.e. when $|f| > 1$?
    – Mittal G
    Nov 23 at 11:30






    @ José Carlos Santos Also what about other cases i.e. when $|f| > 1$?
    – Mittal G
    Nov 23 at 11:30






    1




    1




    If $lvert frvert=Mneq0$, then $leftlvertfrac fMrightrvert=1$. So, $leftlVertfrac fMrightrVertleqslant2$, and therefore $lVert frVertleqslant2M$.
    – José Carlos Santos
    Nov 23 at 11:32




    If $lvert frvert=Mneq0$, then $leftlvertfrac fMrightrvert=1$. So, $leftlVertfrac fMrightrVertleqslant2$, and therefore $lVert frVertleqslant2M$.
    – José Carlos Santos
    Nov 23 at 11:32












    Great. Thanks a lot.
    – Mittal G
    Nov 23 at 11:38




    Great. Thanks a lot.
    – Mittal G
    Nov 23 at 11:38










    up vote
    0
    down vote













    Let $f$ be a function in the given space. It reaches the minimal and the maximal values, $m$ and $M$ say, at two points $a,b$ say inside $I=[0,1]$. Then the (only) term we have to control using $int_I |f(x)|; dx$ and $|f'|_infty$ is $|f|_infty=max(|m|,|M|)$.



    In the case $m,M$ have the same sign, we may and do assume (after possibly passing from $f$ to $-f$) $0le mle M$. Then
    $$ M
    =m+(M-m)le int_I|f(x)|; dx+|f'(xi)|,|b-a|le |f| .
    $$

    In the remained case $mle 0le M$ we find an intermediate $c$ between $a$, $b$ with $f(c)=0$. So
    $$
    begin{aligned}
    |M| &= (M-0) = |f'(xi_1)|,|b-c|le |f'|_infty le |f| , \
    |m| &= (0-m) = |f'(xi_2)|,|c-a|le |f'|_infty le |f| .
    end{aligned}
    $$

    Summing up:
    $$
    |f| =|f|_infty + |f'|_infty le |f| + |f'|_infty le |f|+|f|= 2|f| .
    $$






    share|cite|improve this answer

























      up vote
      0
      down vote













      Let $f$ be a function in the given space. It reaches the minimal and the maximal values, $m$ and $M$ say, at two points $a,b$ say inside $I=[0,1]$. Then the (only) term we have to control using $int_I |f(x)|; dx$ and $|f'|_infty$ is $|f|_infty=max(|m|,|M|)$.



      In the case $m,M$ have the same sign, we may and do assume (after possibly passing from $f$ to $-f$) $0le mle M$. Then
      $$ M
      =m+(M-m)le int_I|f(x)|; dx+|f'(xi)|,|b-a|le |f| .
      $$

      In the remained case $mle 0le M$ we find an intermediate $c$ between $a$, $b$ with $f(c)=0$. So
      $$
      begin{aligned}
      |M| &= (M-0) = |f'(xi_1)|,|b-c|le |f'|_infty le |f| , \
      |m| &= (0-m) = |f'(xi_2)|,|c-a|le |f'|_infty le |f| .
      end{aligned}
      $$

      Summing up:
      $$
      |f| =|f|_infty + |f'|_infty le |f| + |f'|_infty le |f|+|f|= 2|f| .
      $$






      share|cite|improve this answer























        up vote
        0
        down vote










        up vote
        0
        down vote









        Let $f$ be a function in the given space. It reaches the minimal and the maximal values, $m$ and $M$ say, at two points $a,b$ say inside $I=[0,1]$. Then the (only) term we have to control using $int_I |f(x)|; dx$ and $|f'|_infty$ is $|f|_infty=max(|m|,|M|)$.



        In the case $m,M$ have the same sign, we may and do assume (after possibly passing from $f$ to $-f$) $0le mle M$. Then
        $$ M
        =m+(M-m)le int_I|f(x)|; dx+|f'(xi)|,|b-a|le |f| .
        $$

        In the remained case $mle 0le M$ we find an intermediate $c$ between $a$, $b$ with $f(c)=0$. So
        $$
        begin{aligned}
        |M| &= (M-0) = |f'(xi_1)|,|b-c|le |f'|_infty le |f| , \
        |m| &= (0-m) = |f'(xi_2)|,|c-a|le |f'|_infty le |f| .
        end{aligned}
        $$

        Summing up:
        $$
        |f| =|f|_infty + |f'|_infty le |f| + |f'|_infty le |f|+|f|= 2|f| .
        $$






        share|cite|improve this answer












        Let $f$ be a function in the given space. It reaches the minimal and the maximal values, $m$ and $M$ say, at two points $a,b$ say inside $I=[0,1]$. Then the (only) term we have to control using $int_I |f(x)|; dx$ and $|f'|_infty$ is $|f|_infty=max(|m|,|M|)$.



        In the case $m,M$ have the same sign, we may and do assume (after possibly passing from $f$ to $-f$) $0le mle M$. Then
        $$ M
        =m+(M-m)le int_I|f(x)|; dx+|f'(xi)|,|b-a|le |f| .
        $$

        In the remained case $mle 0le M$ we find an intermediate $c$ between $a$, $b$ with $f(c)=0$. So
        $$
        begin{aligned}
        |M| &= (M-0) = |f'(xi_1)|,|b-c|le |f'|_infty le |f| , \
        |m| &= (0-m) = |f'(xi_2)|,|c-a|le |f'|_infty le |f| .
        end{aligned}
        $$

        Summing up:
        $$
        |f| =|f|_infty + |f'|_infty le |f| + |f'|_infty le |f|+|f|= 2|f| .
        $$







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Nov 23 at 17:40









        dan_fulea

        6,2401312




        6,2401312






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3010219%2fhow-to-show-that-the-following-norms-are-equivalent%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Quarter-circle Tiles

            build a pushdown automaton that recognizes the reverse language of a given pushdown automaton?

            Mont Emei