$L^1$ inequality between ordered real numbers implies $L^2$ norm inequality











up vote
2
down vote

favorite
1













Let $x_1,ldots,x_n$ be real numbers such that $|x_1|geq ldotsgeq |x_n|$ and $displaystyle sum_{i=k+1}^n |x_i| leq alpha sum_{i=1}^k |x_i|$ where $1leq k leq n-1$ and $alpha >0$.



Prove that $$sum_{i=k+1}^n x_i^2 leq alpha sum_{i=1}^k x_i^2$$




I have managed to prove a looser inequality: $$begin{align}
alpha sum_{i=1}^k x_i^2
&geq frac{alpha}{k}left(sum_{i=1}^k |x_i| right)^2 quad quad text{Cauchy-Schwarz}\
&geq frac 1k sum_{i=k+1}^n |x_i| sum_{i=1}^k |x_i|\
&geq frac 1k left(sum_{i=k+1}^n |x_i| right)^2\
&geq frac 1k sum_{i=k+1}^n x_i^2 quad quad text{since } |z|_1 geq |z|_2
end{align}$$



Since $frac 1k$ is not $geq 1$, I'm stuck...










share|cite|improve this question




























    up vote
    2
    down vote

    favorite
    1













    Let $x_1,ldots,x_n$ be real numbers such that $|x_1|geq ldotsgeq |x_n|$ and $displaystyle sum_{i=k+1}^n |x_i| leq alpha sum_{i=1}^k |x_i|$ where $1leq k leq n-1$ and $alpha >0$.



    Prove that $$sum_{i=k+1}^n x_i^2 leq alpha sum_{i=1}^k x_i^2$$




    I have managed to prove a looser inequality: $$begin{align}
    alpha sum_{i=1}^k x_i^2
    &geq frac{alpha}{k}left(sum_{i=1}^k |x_i| right)^2 quad quad text{Cauchy-Schwarz}\
    &geq frac 1k sum_{i=k+1}^n |x_i| sum_{i=1}^k |x_i|\
    &geq frac 1k left(sum_{i=k+1}^n |x_i| right)^2\
    &geq frac 1k sum_{i=k+1}^n x_i^2 quad quad text{since } |z|_1 geq |z|_2
    end{align}$$



    Since $frac 1k$ is not $geq 1$, I'm stuck...










    share|cite|improve this question


























      up vote
      2
      down vote

      favorite
      1









      up vote
      2
      down vote

      favorite
      1






      1






      Let $x_1,ldots,x_n$ be real numbers such that $|x_1|geq ldotsgeq |x_n|$ and $displaystyle sum_{i=k+1}^n |x_i| leq alpha sum_{i=1}^k |x_i|$ where $1leq k leq n-1$ and $alpha >0$.



      Prove that $$sum_{i=k+1}^n x_i^2 leq alpha sum_{i=1}^k x_i^2$$




      I have managed to prove a looser inequality: $$begin{align}
      alpha sum_{i=1}^k x_i^2
      &geq frac{alpha}{k}left(sum_{i=1}^k |x_i| right)^2 quad quad text{Cauchy-Schwarz}\
      &geq frac 1k sum_{i=k+1}^n |x_i| sum_{i=1}^k |x_i|\
      &geq frac 1k left(sum_{i=k+1}^n |x_i| right)^2\
      &geq frac 1k sum_{i=k+1}^n x_i^2 quad quad text{since } |z|_1 geq |z|_2
      end{align}$$



      Since $frac 1k$ is not $geq 1$, I'm stuck...










      share|cite|improve this question
















      Let $x_1,ldots,x_n$ be real numbers such that $|x_1|geq ldotsgeq |x_n|$ and $displaystyle sum_{i=k+1}^n |x_i| leq alpha sum_{i=1}^k |x_i|$ where $1leq k leq n-1$ and $alpha >0$.



      Prove that $$sum_{i=k+1}^n x_i^2 leq alpha sum_{i=1}^k x_i^2$$




      I have managed to prove a looser inequality: $$begin{align}
      alpha sum_{i=1}^k x_i^2
      &geq frac{alpha}{k}left(sum_{i=1}^k |x_i| right)^2 quad quad text{Cauchy-Schwarz}\
      &geq frac 1k sum_{i=k+1}^n |x_i| sum_{i=1}^k |x_i|\
      &geq frac 1k left(sum_{i=k+1}^n |x_i| right)^2\
      &geq frac 1k sum_{i=k+1}^n x_i^2 quad quad text{since } |z|_1 geq |z|_2
      end{align}$$



      Since $frac 1k$ is not $geq 1$, I'm stuck...







      real-analysis inequality cauchy-schwarz-inequality






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Nov 21 at 11:28









      Tianlalu

      2,9901936




      2,9901936










      asked Nov 21 at 10:15









      Issou Chankla

      254




      254






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted










          It is quite simple: Note that $|x_i| le |x_k|$ for any $i in {k+1,ldots,n}$. Thus
          $$tag{1}sum_{i=k+1}^n x_i^2 le |x_k| sum_{i=k+1}^n |x_i| le alpha |x_k| sum_{i=1}^k |x_i|,$$
          where the given condition is used in the last step. Now $|x_k x_i| le x_i^2$ for an $i=1,ldots,k$, because $|x_k| le |x_i|$ for all $i=1,ldots,k$. So proceeding in (1) gives the claimed estimate
          $$sum_{i=k+1}^n x_i^2lealpha sum_{i=1}^k x_i^2.$$






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • Nice, thank you. This line of thought did not occur to me.
            – Issou Chankla
            Nov 21 at 11:17










          • In general you lose information, if you apply Cauchy-Schwarz. The constants between $|cdot|_1$ and $|cdot|_2$ are also strict. In fact, the key point here is the condition $|x_1| ge ldots ge |x_n|$. (The statement is wrong without this condition!)
            – p4sch
            Nov 21 at 12:04











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3007523%2fl1-inequality-between-ordered-real-numbers-implies-l2-norm-inequality%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted










          It is quite simple: Note that $|x_i| le |x_k|$ for any $i in {k+1,ldots,n}$. Thus
          $$tag{1}sum_{i=k+1}^n x_i^2 le |x_k| sum_{i=k+1}^n |x_i| le alpha |x_k| sum_{i=1}^k |x_i|,$$
          where the given condition is used in the last step. Now $|x_k x_i| le x_i^2$ for an $i=1,ldots,k$, because $|x_k| le |x_i|$ for all $i=1,ldots,k$. So proceeding in (1) gives the claimed estimate
          $$sum_{i=k+1}^n x_i^2lealpha sum_{i=1}^k x_i^2.$$






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • Nice, thank you. This line of thought did not occur to me.
            – Issou Chankla
            Nov 21 at 11:17










          • In general you lose information, if you apply Cauchy-Schwarz. The constants between $|cdot|_1$ and $|cdot|_2$ are also strict. In fact, the key point here is the condition $|x_1| ge ldots ge |x_n|$. (The statement is wrong without this condition!)
            – p4sch
            Nov 21 at 12:04















          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted










          It is quite simple: Note that $|x_i| le |x_k|$ for any $i in {k+1,ldots,n}$. Thus
          $$tag{1}sum_{i=k+1}^n x_i^2 le |x_k| sum_{i=k+1}^n |x_i| le alpha |x_k| sum_{i=1}^k |x_i|,$$
          where the given condition is used in the last step. Now $|x_k x_i| le x_i^2$ for an $i=1,ldots,k$, because $|x_k| le |x_i|$ for all $i=1,ldots,k$. So proceeding in (1) gives the claimed estimate
          $$sum_{i=k+1}^n x_i^2lealpha sum_{i=1}^k x_i^2.$$






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • Nice, thank you. This line of thought did not occur to me.
            – Issou Chankla
            Nov 21 at 11:17










          • In general you lose information, if you apply Cauchy-Schwarz. The constants between $|cdot|_1$ and $|cdot|_2$ are also strict. In fact, the key point here is the condition $|x_1| ge ldots ge |x_n|$. (The statement is wrong without this condition!)
            – p4sch
            Nov 21 at 12:04













          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted







          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted






          It is quite simple: Note that $|x_i| le |x_k|$ for any $i in {k+1,ldots,n}$. Thus
          $$tag{1}sum_{i=k+1}^n x_i^2 le |x_k| sum_{i=k+1}^n |x_i| le alpha |x_k| sum_{i=1}^k |x_i|,$$
          where the given condition is used in the last step. Now $|x_k x_i| le x_i^2$ for an $i=1,ldots,k$, because $|x_k| le |x_i|$ for all $i=1,ldots,k$. So proceeding in (1) gives the claimed estimate
          $$sum_{i=k+1}^n x_i^2lealpha sum_{i=1}^k x_i^2.$$






          share|cite|improve this answer












          It is quite simple: Note that $|x_i| le |x_k|$ for any $i in {k+1,ldots,n}$. Thus
          $$tag{1}sum_{i=k+1}^n x_i^2 le |x_k| sum_{i=k+1}^n |x_i| le alpha |x_k| sum_{i=1}^k |x_i|,$$
          where the given condition is used in the last step. Now $|x_k x_i| le x_i^2$ for an $i=1,ldots,k$, because $|x_k| le |x_i|$ for all $i=1,ldots,k$. So proceeding in (1) gives the claimed estimate
          $$sum_{i=k+1}^n x_i^2lealpha sum_{i=1}^k x_i^2.$$







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Nov 21 at 11:06









          p4sch

          4,800217




          4,800217












          • Nice, thank you. This line of thought did not occur to me.
            – Issou Chankla
            Nov 21 at 11:17










          • In general you lose information, if you apply Cauchy-Schwarz. The constants between $|cdot|_1$ and $|cdot|_2$ are also strict. In fact, the key point here is the condition $|x_1| ge ldots ge |x_n|$. (The statement is wrong without this condition!)
            – p4sch
            Nov 21 at 12:04


















          • Nice, thank you. This line of thought did not occur to me.
            – Issou Chankla
            Nov 21 at 11:17










          • In general you lose information, if you apply Cauchy-Schwarz. The constants between $|cdot|_1$ and $|cdot|_2$ are also strict. In fact, the key point here is the condition $|x_1| ge ldots ge |x_n|$. (The statement is wrong without this condition!)
            – p4sch
            Nov 21 at 12:04
















          Nice, thank you. This line of thought did not occur to me.
          – Issou Chankla
          Nov 21 at 11:17




          Nice, thank you. This line of thought did not occur to me.
          – Issou Chankla
          Nov 21 at 11:17












          In general you lose information, if you apply Cauchy-Schwarz. The constants between $|cdot|_1$ and $|cdot|_2$ are also strict. In fact, the key point here is the condition $|x_1| ge ldots ge |x_n|$. (The statement is wrong without this condition!)
          – p4sch
          Nov 21 at 12:04




          In general you lose information, if you apply Cauchy-Schwarz. The constants between $|cdot|_1$ and $|cdot|_2$ are also strict. In fact, the key point here is the condition $|x_1| ge ldots ge |x_n|$. (The statement is wrong without this condition!)
          – p4sch
          Nov 21 at 12:04


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3007523%2fl1-inequality-between-ordered-real-numbers-implies-l2-norm-inequality%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Quarter-circle Tiles

          build a pushdown automaton that recognizes the reverse language of a given pushdown automaton?

          Mont Emei