The cotangent bundle of a non-compact Riemann surface
up vote
6
down vote
favorite
Suppose that $M$ is a non-compact Riemann surface obtained by removing several points from a compact one. It is known that the holomorphic cotangent bundle of $M$ is trivial. Therefore there exists a holomorphic 1-form $omega$ that does not have any zeroes on $M$. I am interested to know whether we can find an exact 1-form $omega=df$, where $f$ is some holomorphic function on $M$, such that $omega$ does not have zeroes on $M$.
ag.algebraic-geometry
add a comment |
up vote
6
down vote
favorite
Suppose that $M$ is a non-compact Riemann surface obtained by removing several points from a compact one. It is known that the holomorphic cotangent bundle of $M$ is trivial. Therefore there exists a holomorphic 1-form $omega$ that does not have any zeroes on $M$. I am interested to know whether we can find an exact 1-form $omega=df$, where $f$ is some holomorphic function on $M$, such that $omega$ does not have zeroes on $M$.
ag.algebraic-geometry
add a comment |
up vote
6
down vote
favorite
up vote
6
down vote
favorite
Suppose that $M$ is a non-compact Riemann surface obtained by removing several points from a compact one. It is known that the holomorphic cotangent bundle of $M$ is trivial. Therefore there exists a holomorphic 1-form $omega$ that does not have any zeroes on $M$. I am interested to know whether we can find an exact 1-form $omega=df$, where $f$ is some holomorphic function on $M$, such that $omega$ does not have zeroes on $M$.
ag.algebraic-geometry
Suppose that $M$ is a non-compact Riemann surface obtained by removing several points from a compact one. It is known that the holomorphic cotangent bundle of $M$ is trivial. Therefore there exists a holomorphic 1-form $omega$ that does not have any zeroes on $M$. I am interested to know whether we can find an exact 1-form $omega=df$, where $f$ is some holomorphic function on $M$, such that $omega$ does not have zeroes on $M$.
ag.algebraic-geometry
ag.algebraic-geometry
asked yesterday
Todor
561
561
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
10
down vote
Such $f$ exists on every open Riemann surface:
R.C. Gunning and R. Narasimhan. Immersion of open Riemann surfaces.
Math. Ann., 174:103–108, 1967.
1
We discussed this paper at mathoverflow.net/questions/287275
– David E Speyer
yesterday
@David E Speyer: Thanks for reminding. I remembered that I learned about this paper from MO, but no exact context.
– Alexandre Eremenko
yesterday
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
10
down vote
Such $f$ exists on every open Riemann surface:
R.C. Gunning and R. Narasimhan. Immersion of open Riemann surfaces.
Math. Ann., 174:103–108, 1967.
1
We discussed this paper at mathoverflow.net/questions/287275
– David E Speyer
yesterday
@David E Speyer: Thanks for reminding. I remembered that I learned about this paper from MO, but no exact context.
– Alexandre Eremenko
yesterday
add a comment |
up vote
10
down vote
Such $f$ exists on every open Riemann surface:
R.C. Gunning and R. Narasimhan. Immersion of open Riemann surfaces.
Math. Ann., 174:103–108, 1967.
1
We discussed this paper at mathoverflow.net/questions/287275
– David E Speyer
yesterday
@David E Speyer: Thanks for reminding. I remembered that I learned about this paper from MO, but no exact context.
– Alexandre Eremenko
yesterday
add a comment |
up vote
10
down vote
up vote
10
down vote
Such $f$ exists on every open Riemann surface:
R.C. Gunning and R. Narasimhan. Immersion of open Riemann surfaces.
Math. Ann., 174:103–108, 1967.
Such $f$ exists on every open Riemann surface:
R.C. Gunning and R. Narasimhan. Immersion of open Riemann surfaces.
Math. Ann., 174:103–108, 1967.
edited yesterday
answered yesterday
Alexandre Eremenko
48.8k6136252
48.8k6136252
1
We discussed this paper at mathoverflow.net/questions/287275
– David E Speyer
yesterday
@David E Speyer: Thanks for reminding. I remembered that I learned about this paper from MO, but no exact context.
– Alexandre Eremenko
yesterday
add a comment |
1
We discussed this paper at mathoverflow.net/questions/287275
– David E Speyer
yesterday
@David E Speyer: Thanks for reminding. I remembered that I learned about this paper from MO, but no exact context.
– Alexandre Eremenko
yesterday
1
1
We discussed this paper at mathoverflow.net/questions/287275
– David E Speyer
yesterday
We discussed this paper at mathoverflow.net/questions/287275
– David E Speyer
yesterday
@David E Speyer: Thanks for reminding. I remembered that I learned about this paper from MO, but no exact context.
– Alexandre Eremenko
yesterday
@David E Speyer: Thanks for reminding. I remembered that I learned about this paper from MO, but no exact context.
– Alexandre Eremenko
yesterday
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to MathOverflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f316925%2fthe-cotangent-bundle-of-a-non-compact-riemann-surface%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown