The Median Minimizes the Sum of Absolute Deviations (The $ {L}_{1} $ Norm)
up vote
73
down vote
favorite
Suppose we have a set $S$ of real numbers. Show that
$$sum_{sin S}|s-x| $$
is minimal if $x$ is equal to the median.
This is a sample exam question of one of the exams that I need to take and I don't know how to proceed.
optimization absolute-value median
add a comment |
up vote
73
down vote
favorite
Suppose we have a set $S$ of real numbers. Show that
$$sum_{sin S}|s-x| $$
is minimal if $x$ is equal to the median.
This is a sample exam question of one of the exams that I need to take and I don't know how to proceed.
optimization absolute-value median
13
Please replace THE median by ANY median.
– Did
Feb 25 '12 at 18:47
add a comment |
up vote
73
down vote
favorite
up vote
73
down vote
favorite
Suppose we have a set $S$ of real numbers. Show that
$$sum_{sin S}|s-x| $$
is minimal if $x$ is equal to the median.
This is a sample exam question of one of the exams that I need to take and I don't know how to proceed.
optimization absolute-value median
Suppose we have a set $S$ of real numbers. Show that
$$sum_{sin S}|s-x| $$
is minimal if $x$ is equal to the median.
This is a sample exam question of one of the exams that I need to take and I don't know how to proceed.
optimization absolute-value median
optimization absolute-value median
edited Jun 1 at 17:16
Royi
3,30012351
3,30012351
asked Feb 25 '12 at 16:48
hattenn
5941611
5941611
13
Please replace THE median by ANY median.
– Did
Feb 25 '12 at 18:47
add a comment |
13
Please replace THE median by ANY median.
– Did
Feb 25 '12 at 18:47
13
13
Please replace THE median by ANY median.
– Did
Feb 25 '12 at 18:47
Please replace THE median by ANY median.
– Did
Feb 25 '12 at 18:47
add a comment |
8 Answers
8
active
oldest
votes
up vote
57
down vote
accepted
Introduction: The solution below is essentially the same as the solution given by Brian M. Scott, but it will take a lot longer. You are expected to assume that $S$ is a finite set. with say $k$ elements. Line them up in order, as $s_1<s_2<cdots <s_k$.
The situation is a little different when $k$ is odd than when $k$ is even. In particular, if $k$ is even there are (depending on the exact definition of median) many medians. We tell the story first for $k$ odd.
Recall that $|x-s_i|$ is the distance between $x$ and $s_i$, so we are trying to minimize the sum of the distances. For example, we have $k$ people who live at various points on the $x$-axis. We want to find the point(s) $x$ such that the sum of the travel distances of the $k$ people to $x$ is a minimum.
The story: Imagine that the $s_i$ are points on the $x$-axis. For clarity, take $k=7$. Start from well to the left of all the $s_i$, and take a tiny step, say of length $epsilon$, to the right. Then you have gotten $epsilon$ closer to every one of the $s_i$, so the sum of the distances has decreased by $7epsilon$.
Keep taking tiny steps to the right, each time getting a decrease of $7epsilon$. This continues until you hit $s_1$. If you now take a tiny step to the right, then your distance from $s_1$ increases by $epsilon$, and your distance from each of the remaining $s_i$ decreases by $epsilon$. What has happened to the sum of the distances? There is a decrease of $6epsilon$, and an increase of $epsilon$, for a net decrease of $5epsilon$ in the sum.
This continues until you hit $s_2$. Now, when you take a tiny step to the right, your distance from each of $s_1$ and $s_2$ increases by $epsilon$, and your distance from each of the five others decreases by $epsilon$, for a
net decrease of $3epsilon$.
This continues until you hit $s_3$. The next tiny step gives an increase of $3epsilon$, and a decrease of $4epsilon$, for a net decrease of $epsilon$.
This continues until you hit $s_4$. The next little step brings a total increase of $4epsilon$, and a total decrease of $3epsilon$, for an increase of $epsilon$. Things get even worse when you travel further to the right. So the minimum sum of distances is reached at $s_4$, the median.
The situation is quite similar if $k$ is even, say $k=6$. As you travel to the right, there is a net decrease at every step, until you hit $s_3$. When you are between $s_3$ and $s_4$, a tiny step of $epsilon$ increases your distance from each of $s_1$, $s_2$, and $s_3$ by $epsilon$. But it decreases your distance from each of the three others, for no net gain. Thus any $x$ in the interval from $s_3$ to $s_4$, including the endpoints, minimizes the sum of the distances. In the even case, I prefer to say that any point between the two "middle" points is a median. So the conclusion is that the points that minimize the sum are the medians. But some people prefer to define the median in the even case to be the average of the two "middle" points. Then the median does minimize the sum of the distances, but some other points also do.
add a comment |
up vote
37
down vote
We're basically after:
$$ arg min_{x} sum_{i = 1}^{N} left| {s}_{i} - x right| $$
One should notice that $ frac{mathrm{d} left | x right | }{mathrm{d} x} = operatorname{sign} left( x right) $ (Being more rigorous would say it is a Sub Gradient of the non smooth $ {L}_{1} $ Norm function).
Hence, deriving the sum above yields $ sum_{i = 1}^{N} operatorname{sign} left( {s}_{i} - x right) $.
This equals to zero only when the number of positive items equals the number of negative which happens when $ x = operatorname{median} left{ {s}_{1}, {s}_{2}, cdots, {s}_{N} right} $.
One should notice that the median of a discrete group is not uniquely defined.
Moreover, it is not necessarily an item within the group.
3
Using derivatives here is overkill; the problem can be done by more elementary methods. $qquad$
– Michael Hardy
Oct 28 '16 at 17:06
add a comment |
up vote
29
down vote
Suppose that the set $S$ has $n$ elements, $s_1<s_2<dots<s_n$. If $x<s_1$, then $$f(x)=sum_{sin S}|s-x|=sum_{sin S}(s-x)=sum_{k=1}^n(s_k-x);.tag{1}$$ As $x$ increases, each term of $(1)$ decreases until $x$ reaches $s_1$, therefore $f(s_1)<f(x)$ for all $x<s_1$.
Now suppose that $s_kle xle x+dle s_{k+1}$. Then
$$begin{align*}f(x+d)&=sum_{i=1}^kBig(x+d-s_iBig)+sum_{i=k+1}^nBig(s_i-(x+d)Big)\
&=dk+sum_{i=1}^k(x-s_i)-d(n-k)+sum_{i=k+1}^n(s_i-x)\
&=d(2k-n)+sum_{i=1}^k(x-s_i)+sum_{i=k+1}^n(s_i-x)\
&=d(2k-n)+f(x);,
end{align*}$$
so $f(x+d)-f(x)=d(2k-n)$. This is negative if $2k<n$, zero if $2k=n$, and positive if $2k>n$. Thus, on the interval $[s_k,s_{k+1}]$
$$f(x)text{ is }begin{cases}
text{decreasing},&text{if }2k<n\
text{constant},&text{if }2k=n\
text{increasing},&text{if }2k>n;.
end{cases}$$
From here it shouldn’t be too hard to show that $f(x)$ is minimal when $x$ is the median of $S$.
3
But a small typo. In "As x increases, each term of (1) decreases until x reaches x_1, so" You intended to say s_1 instead of x_1.
– Neo M Hacker
Sep 28 '17 at 3:23
add a comment |
up vote
10
down vote
You want the median of $n$ numbers. Say $x$ is bigger than $12$ of them and smaller than $8$ of them (so $n=20$). If $x$ increases, it's getting closer to $8$ of the numbers and farther from $12$ of them, so the sum of the distances gets greater. And if $x$ decreases, it's getting closer to $12$ of them and farther from $8$ of them, so the sum of the distances gets smaller.
A similar thing happens if $x$ is smaller than more of the $n$ numbers than $x$ is bigger than.
But if $x$ is smaller than $10$ of them and bigger than $10$ of them, then when $x$ moves, it's getting farther from $10$ of them and closer to just as many of them, so the sum of the distances is not changing.
So the sum of the distances is smallest when the number of data points less than $x$ is the same as the number of data points bigger than $x$.
add a comment |
up vote
6
down vote
Starting with $$f(x)=sum_{i=1}^n |s_i-x|$$
Assume we rearranged our terms such that $s_1<s_2<cdots<s_n$
We first proceed by making the following observation $$sum_{i=1}^n |s_i-x| = sum_{i=2}^{n-1} |s_i-x| +(s_n -s_1) quad text{when} quad x in [s_1,s_n]$$
Now suppose that $n$ is odd, then by applying the above identity repeatedly we get $$f(x)=sum_{i=1}^n |s_i-x|=|s_{frac{n+1}2}-x|+(s_n -s_1)+(s_{n-1}-s_2)+cdots+(s_{frac{n+3}2}-s_{frac{n-1}2})$$ or in other words $$f(x)=|s_{frac{n+1}{2}}-x|+text{constant}$$
This is just the absolute value function with its vertex being at $(s_{frac{n+1}{2}},text{constant})$, the minimum of the absolute value function occurs at its vertex, therefore $s_{frac{n+1}{2}}$(median) minmizes $f(x)$.
Now suppose $n$ is even, again by using our identity, we have $$f(x)=sum_{i=1}^n |s_i-x|=|s_{frac{n}2}-x|+|s_{frac{n+2}2}-x| + text{constant}$$
Where the minimum occurs at $f'(x)=0$(or when not defined), therefore by differentiating and setting $f'(x)$ to zero we get $$dfrac{|s_{frac{n}{2}}-x|}{s_{frac{n}{2}}-x}+dfrac{|s_{frac{n+2}{2}}-x|}{s_{frac{n+2}{2}}-x}=0$$
Observe that $s:=dfrac{s_{frac{n+2}{2}}+s_{frac{n}{2}}}{2}$(median) satisfies the above equation, since $s$ is halfway between $s_{frac{n}{2}}$ and $s_{frac{n+2}{2}}$ $$s_{frac{n}{2}}-s=-(s_{frac{n+2}{2}}-s)$$ that is by setting $x=s$ we get $$dfrac{|s_{frac{n}{2}}-s|}{s_{frac{n}{2}}-s}+dfrac{|s_{frac{n}{2}}-s|}{-(s_{frac{n}{2}}-s)}=0$$
Therefore $s$ is a minimum.
I think some theory about minimum being where $f'(x) = 0$ for non differentiable functions is needed here
– Guerlando OCs
Aug 27 at 0:56
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
Consider two $x_i$'s $x_1$ and $x_2$,
For $x_1leq aleq x_2$, $sum_{i=1}^{2}|x_i-a|=|x_1-a|+|x_2-a|=a-x_1+x_2-a=x_2-x_1$
For $alt x_1$, $sum_{i=1}^{2}|x_i-a|=x_1-a+x_2-a=x_1+x_2-2agt x_1+x_2-2x_1=x_2-x_1$
For $agt x_2$,$sum_{i=1}^{2}|x_i-a|=-x_1+a-x_2+a=-x_1-x_2+2agt -x_1-x_2+2x_2=x_2-x_1$
$implies$for any two $x_i$'s the sum of the absolute values of the deviations is minimum when $x_1leq aleq x_2$ or $ain[x_1,x_2]$.
When $n$ is odd,
$$
sum_{i=1}^{n}|x_i-a|=|x_1-a|+|x_2-a|+....+|x_{tfrac{n-1}{2}}-a|+|x_{tfrac{n+1}{2}}-a|+|x_{tfrac{n+3}{2}}-a|+....+|x_{n-1}-a|+|x_n-a|
$$
consider the intervals $[x_1,x_n], [x_2,x_{n-1}], [x_3,x_{n-2}],....,[x_{tfrac{n-1}{2}},x_{tfrac{n+3}{2}}]$. If $a$ is a member of all these intervals. i.e,$[x_{tfrac{n-1}{2}},x_{tfrac{n+3}{2}}]$,
using the above theorem, we can say that all the terms in the sum except $|x_{tfrac{n+1}{2}}-a|$ are minimized. So
$$
sum_{i=1}^{n}|x_i-a|=(x_n-x_1)+(x_{n-1}-x_2)+(x_{n-2}-x_3)+....+(x_{tfrac{n+3}{2}}-x_{tfrac{n-1}{2}})+|x_{tfrac{n+1}{2}}-a|=|x_{tfrac{n+1}{2}}-a|+text{costant}
$$
Now since the derivative of modulus function is signum function, $f'(a)=text{sgn}(x_{tfrac{n+1}{2}}-a)=0$ for $a=x_{tfrac{n+1}{2}}=text{Median}$
$implies$ When $n$ is odd,the median minimizes the sum of absolute values of the deviations.
When $n$ is even,
$$
sum_{i=1}^{n}|x_i-a|=|x_1-a|+|x_2-a|+....+|x_{tfrac{n}{2}}-a|+|x_{tfrac{n}{2}+1}-a|+....+|x_{n-1}-a|+|x_n-a|\
$$
If $a$ is a member of all the intervals $[x_1,x_n], [x_2,x_{n-1}], [x_3,x_{n-2}],....,[x_{tfrac{n}{2}},x_{tfrac{n}{2}+1}]$, i.e, $ain[x_{tfrac{n}{2}},x_{tfrac{n}{2}+1}]$,
$$
sum_{i=1}^{n}|x_i-a|=(x_n-x_1)+(x_{n-1}-x_2)+(x_{n-2}-x_3)+....+(x_{tfrac{n}{2}+1}-x_{tfrac{n}{2}})
$$
$implies$ When $n$ is even, any number in the interval $[x_{tfrac{n}{2}},x_{tfrac{n}{2}+1}]$, i.e, including the median, minimizes the sum of absolute values of the deviations. For example consider the series:$2, 4, 5, 10$, median, $M=4.5$.
$$
sum_{i=1}^4|x_i-M|=2.5+0.5+0.5+5.5=9
$$
If you take any other value in the interval $[x_{tfrac{n}{2}},x_{tfrac{n}{2}+1}]=[4,5]$, say 4.1
$$
sum_{i=1}^4|x_i-4.1|=2.1+0.1+0.9+5.9=9
$$
For any value outside the interval $[x_{tfrac{n}{2}},x_{tfrac{n}{2}+1}]=[4,5]$, say 5.2
$$
sum_{i=1}^4|x_i-5.2|=3.2+1.2+0.2+4.8=9.4
$$
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
Suppose $S$ is finite (with cardinal $s$), without repetitions, and ordered. Then the sum of absolute values is continuous (sum of continuous functions), and piecewise linear (hence differentiable), with left-most slope $-s$. By induction, the slope increases by 2 for each interval from left to right, with right-most slope $+s$. Hence the piece-wise slope first reaches either $-1$ or $0$ at index $leftlfloor frac{s+1}{2}rightrfloor$, and $0$ or $+1$ at index $leftlceil frac{s+1}{2}rightrceil$.
Hence the function attains its minima in the interval $left[leftlfloor frac{s+1}{2}rightrfloor, leftlceil frac{s+1}{2}rightrceilright]$, which reduces to a singleton when $s$ is odd.
The notion of median for continuous functions is detailed in Sunny Garlang Noah, The Median of a Continuous Function, Real Anal. Exchange, 2007
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
Consider two real numbers $a<b$. Then the objective becomes
$$dist(a,b) = |x-a|+|x-b|$$
This expression is minimum when $aleq x leq b$. It can be proved by calculating the objective on 3 cases ($x<a, aleq xleq b, x>b$).
Now consider the general case where $S$ has $n$ elements. Sort them in increasing order as $S_1, S_2, ldots, S_n$.
Pair the smallest and the largest numbers. As explained above, $dist(S_1,S_n)$ is minimum when $S_1leq xleq S_n$. Remove these two elements from the list and continue this procedure until there is at most one element left in the set.
If there is an element $S_i$ left, then $x=S_i$ minimizes $dist(x-S_i)$. It also lies between all the pairs.
In the case of even elements, finally the sequence will be empty. As in the case above, median lies between all the pairs.
add a comment |
8 Answers
8
active
oldest
votes
8 Answers
8
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
57
down vote
accepted
Introduction: The solution below is essentially the same as the solution given by Brian M. Scott, but it will take a lot longer. You are expected to assume that $S$ is a finite set. with say $k$ elements. Line them up in order, as $s_1<s_2<cdots <s_k$.
The situation is a little different when $k$ is odd than when $k$ is even. In particular, if $k$ is even there are (depending on the exact definition of median) many medians. We tell the story first for $k$ odd.
Recall that $|x-s_i|$ is the distance between $x$ and $s_i$, so we are trying to minimize the sum of the distances. For example, we have $k$ people who live at various points on the $x$-axis. We want to find the point(s) $x$ such that the sum of the travel distances of the $k$ people to $x$ is a minimum.
The story: Imagine that the $s_i$ are points on the $x$-axis. For clarity, take $k=7$. Start from well to the left of all the $s_i$, and take a tiny step, say of length $epsilon$, to the right. Then you have gotten $epsilon$ closer to every one of the $s_i$, so the sum of the distances has decreased by $7epsilon$.
Keep taking tiny steps to the right, each time getting a decrease of $7epsilon$. This continues until you hit $s_1$. If you now take a tiny step to the right, then your distance from $s_1$ increases by $epsilon$, and your distance from each of the remaining $s_i$ decreases by $epsilon$. What has happened to the sum of the distances? There is a decrease of $6epsilon$, and an increase of $epsilon$, for a net decrease of $5epsilon$ in the sum.
This continues until you hit $s_2$. Now, when you take a tiny step to the right, your distance from each of $s_1$ and $s_2$ increases by $epsilon$, and your distance from each of the five others decreases by $epsilon$, for a
net decrease of $3epsilon$.
This continues until you hit $s_3$. The next tiny step gives an increase of $3epsilon$, and a decrease of $4epsilon$, for a net decrease of $epsilon$.
This continues until you hit $s_4$. The next little step brings a total increase of $4epsilon$, and a total decrease of $3epsilon$, for an increase of $epsilon$. Things get even worse when you travel further to the right. So the minimum sum of distances is reached at $s_4$, the median.
The situation is quite similar if $k$ is even, say $k=6$. As you travel to the right, there is a net decrease at every step, until you hit $s_3$. When you are between $s_3$ and $s_4$, a tiny step of $epsilon$ increases your distance from each of $s_1$, $s_2$, and $s_3$ by $epsilon$. But it decreases your distance from each of the three others, for no net gain. Thus any $x$ in the interval from $s_3$ to $s_4$, including the endpoints, minimizes the sum of the distances. In the even case, I prefer to say that any point between the two "middle" points is a median. So the conclusion is that the points that minimize the sum are the medians. But some people prefer to define the median in the even case to be the average of the two "middle" points. Then the median does minimize the sum of the distances, but some other points also do.
add a comment |
up vote
57
down vote
accepted
Introduction: The solution below is essentially the same as the solution given by Brian M. Scott, but it will take a lot longer. You are expected to assume that $S$ is a finite set. with say $k$ elements. Line them up in order, as $s_1<s_2<cdots <s_k$.
The situation is a little different when $k$ is odd than when $k$ is even. In particular, if $k$ is even there are (depending on the exact definition of median) many medians. We tell the story first for $k$ odd.
Recall that $|x-s_i|$ is the distance between $x$ and $s_i$, so we are trying to minimize the sum of the distances. For example, we have $k$ people who live at various points on the $x$-axis. We want to find the point(s) $x$ such that the sum of the travel distances of the $k$ people to $x$ is a minimum.
The story: Imagine that the $s_i$ are points on the $x$-axis. For clarity, take $k=7$. Start from well to the left of all the $s_i$, and take a tiny step, say of length $epsilon$, to the right. Then you have gotten $epsilon$ closer to every one of the $s_i$, so the sum of the distances has decreased by $7epsilon$.
Keep taking tiny steps to the right, each time getting a decrease of $7epsilon$. This continues until you hit $s_1$. If you now take a tiny step to the right, then your distance from $s_1$ increases by $epsilon$, and your distance from each of the remaining $s_i$ decreases by $epsilon$. What has happened to the sum of the distances? There is a decrease of $6epsilon$, and an increase of $epsilon$, for a net decrease of $5epsilon$ in the sum.
This continues until you hit $s_2$. Now, when you take a tiny step to the right, your distance from each of $s_1$ and $s_2$ increases by $epsilon$, and your distance from each of the five others decreases by $epsilon$, for a
net decrease of $3epsilon$.
This continues until you hit $s_3$. The next tiny step gives an increase of $3epsilon$, and a decrease of $4epsilon$, for a net decrease of $epsilon$.
This continues until you hit $s_4$. The next little step brings a total increase of $4epsilon$, and a total decrease of $3epsilon$, for an increase of $epsilon$. Things get even worse when you travel further to the right. So the minimum sum of distances is reached at $s_4$, the median.
The situation is quite similar if $k$ is even, say $k=6$. As you travel to the right, there is a net decrease at every step, until you hit $s_3$. When you are between $s_3$ and $s_4$, a tiny step of $epsilon$ increases your distance from each of $s_1$, $s_2$, and $s_3$ by $epsilon$. But it decreases your distance from each of the three others, for no net gain. Thus any $x$ in the interval from $s_3$ to $s_4$, including the endpoints, minimizes the sum of the distances. In the even case, I prefer to say that any point between the two "middle" points is a median. So the conclusion is that the points that minimize the sum are the medians. But some people prefer to define the median in the even case to be the average of the two "middle" points. Then the median does minimize the sum of the distances, but some other points also do.
add a comment |
up vote
57
down vote
accepted
up vote
57
down vote
accepted
Introduction: The solution below is essentially the same as the solution given by Brian M. Scott, but it will take a lot longer. You are expected to assume that $S$ is a finite set. with say $k$ elements. Line them up in order, as $s_1<s_2<cdots <s_k$.
The situation is a little different when $k$ is odd than when $k$ is even. In particular, if $k$ is even there are (depending on the exact definition of median) many medians. We tell the story first for $k$ odd.
Recall that $|x-s_i|$ is the distance between $x$ and $s_i$, so we are trying to minimize the sum of the distances. For example, we have $k$ people who live at various points on the $x$-axis. We want to find the point(s) $x$ such that the sum of the travel distances of the $k$ people to $x$ is a minimum.
The story: Imagine that the $s_i$ are points on the $x$-axis. For clarity, take $k=7$. Start from well to the left of all the $s_i$, and take a tiny step, say of length $epsilon$, to the right. Then you have gotten $epsilon$ closer to every one of the $s_i$, so the sum of the distances has decreased by $7epsilon$.
Keep taking tiny steps to the right, each time getting a decrease of $7epsilon$. This continues until you hit $s_1$. If you now take a tiny step to the right, then your distance from $s_1$ increases by $epsilon$, and your distance from each of the remaining $s_i$ decreases by $epsilon$. What has happened to the sum of the distances? There is a decrease of $6epsilon$, and an increase of $epsilon$, for a net decrease of $5epsilon$ in the sum.
This continues until you hit $s_2$. Now, when you take a tiny step to the right, your distance from each of $s_1$ and $s_2$ increases by $epsilon$, and your distance from each of the five others decreases by $epsilon$, for a
net decrease of $3epsilon$.
This continues until you hit $s_3$. The next tiny step gives an increase of $3epsilon$, and a decrease of $4epsilon$, for a net decrease of $epsilon$.
This continues until you hit $s_4$. The next little step brings a total increase of $4epsilon$, and a total decrease of $3epsilon$, for an increase of $epsilon$. Things get even worse when you travel further to the right. So the minimum sum of distances is reached at $s_4$, the median.
The situation is quite similar if $k$ is even, say $k=6$. As you travel to the right, there is a net decrease at every step, until you hit $s_3$. When you are between $s_3$ and $s_4$, a tiny step of $epsilon$ increases your distance from each of $s_1$, $s_2$, and $s_3$ by $epsilon$. But it decreases your distance from each of the three others, for no net gain. Thus any $x$ in the interval from $s_3$ to $s_4$, including the endpoints, minimizes the sum of the distances. In the even case, I prefer to say that any point between the two "middle" points is a median. So the conclusion is that the points that minimize the sum are the medians. But some people prefer to define the median in the even case to be the average of the two "middle" points. Then the median does minimize the sum of the distances, but some other points also do.
Introduction: The solution below is essentially the same as the solution given by Brian M. Scott, but it will take a lot longer. You are expected to assume that $S$ is a finite set. with say $k$ elements. Line them up in order, as $s_1<s_2<cdots <s_k$.
The situation is a little different when $k$ is odd than when $k$ is even. In particular, if $k$ is even there are (depending on the exact definition of median) many medians. We tell the story first for $k$ odd.
Recall that $|x-s_i|$ is the distance between $x$ and $s_i$, so we are trying to minimize the sum of the distances. For example, we have $k$ people who live at various points on the $x$-axis. We want to find the point(s) $x$ such that the sum of the travel distances of the $k$ people to $x$ is a minimum.
The story: Imagine that the $s_i$ are points on the $x$-axis. For clarity, take $k=7$. Start from well to the left of all the $s_i$, and take a tiny step, say of length $epsilon$, to the right. Then you have gotten $epsilon$ closer to every one of the $s_i$, so the sum of the distances has decreased by $7epsilon$.
Keep taking tiny steps to the right, each time getting a decrease of $7epsilon$. This continues until you hit $s_1$. If you now take a tiny step to the right, then your distance from $s_1$ increases by $epsilon$, and your distance from each of the remaining $s_i$ decreases by $epsilon$. What has happened to the sum of the distances? There is a decrease of $6epsilon$, and an increase of $epsilon$, for a net decrease of $5epsilon$ in the sum.
This continues until you hit $s_2$. Now, when you take a tiny step to the right, your distance from each of $s_1$ and $s_2$ increases by $epsilon$, and your distance from each of the five others decreases by $epsilon$, for a
net decrease of $3epsilon$.
This continues until you hit $s_3$. The next tiny step gives an increase of $3epsilon$, and a decrease of $4epsilon$, for a net decrease of $epsilon$.
This continues until you hit $s_4$. The next little step brings a total increase of $4epsilon$, and a total decrease of $3epsilon$, for an increase of $epsilon$. Things get even worse when you travel further to the right. So the minimum sum of distances is reached at $s_4$, the median.
The situation is quite similar if $k$ is even, say $k=6$. As you travel to the right, there is a net decrease at every step, until you hit $s_3$. When you are between $s_3$ and $s_4$, a tiny step of $epsilon$ increases your distance from each of $s_1$, $s_2$, and $s_3$ by $epsilon$. But it decreases your distance from each of the three others, for no net gain. Thus any $x$ in the interval from $s_3$ to $s_4$, including the endpoints, minimizes the sum of the distances. In the even case, I prefer to say that any point between the two "middle" points is a median. So the conclusion is that the points that minimize the sum are the medians. But some people prefer to define the median in the even case to be the average of the two "middle" points. Then the median does minimize the sum of the distances, but some other points also do.
edited Feb 25 '12 at 22:32
Michael Hardy
1
1
answered Feb 25 '12 at 20:37
André Nicolas
450k36421805
450k36421805
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
37
down vote
We're basically after:
$$ arg min_{x} sum_{i = 1}^{N} left| {s}_{i} - x right| $$
One should notice that $ frac{mathrm{d} left | x right | }{mathrm{d} x} = operatorname{sign} left( x right) $ (Being more rigorous would say it is a Sub Gradient of the non smooth $ {L}_{1} $ Norm function).
Hence, deriving the sum above yields $ sum_{i = 1}^{N} operatorname{sign} left( {s}_{i} - x right) $.
This equals to zero only when the number of positive items equals the number of negative which happens when $ x = operatorname{median} left{ {s}_{1}, {s}_{2}, cdots, {s}_{N} right} $.
One should notice that the median of a discrete group is not uniquely defined.
Moreover, it is not necessarily an item within the group.
3
Using derivatives here is overkill; the problem can be done by more elementary methods. $qquad$
– Michael Hardy
Oct 28 '16 at 17:06
add a comment |
up vote
37
down vote
We're basically after:
$$ arg min_{x} sum_{i = 1}^{N} left| {s}_{i} - x right| $$
One should notice that $ frac{mathrm{d} left | x right | }{mathrm{d} x} = operatorname{sign} left( x right) $ (Being more rigorous would say it is a Sub Gradient of the non smooth $ {L}_{1} $ Norm function).
Hence, deriving the sum above yields $ sum_{i = 1}^{N} operatorname{sign} left( {s}_{i} - x right) $.
This equals to zero only when the number of positive items equals the number of negative which happens when $ x = operatorname{median} left{ {s}_{1}, {s}_{2}, cdots, {s}_{N} right} $.
One should notice that the median of a discrete group is not uniquely defined.
Moreover, it is not necessarily an item within the group.
3
Using derivatives here is overkill; the problem can be done by more elementary methods. $qquad$
– Michael Hardy
Oct 28 '16 at 17:06
add a comment |
up vote
37
down vote
up vote
37
down vote
We're basically after:
$$ arg min_{x} sum_{i = 1}^{N} left| {s}_{i} - x right| $$
One should notice that $ frac{mathrm{d} left | x right | }{mathrm{d} x} = operatorname{sign} left( x right) $ (Being more rigorous would say it is a Sub Gradient of the non smooth $ {L}_{1} $ Norm function).
Hence, deriving the sum above yields $ sum_{i = 1}^{N} operatorname{sign} left( {s}_{i} - x right) $.
This equals to zero only when the number of positive items equals the number of negative which happens when $ x = operatorname{median} left{ {s}_{1}, {s}_{2}, cdots, {s}_{N} right} $.
One should notice that the median of a discrete group is not uniquely defined.
Moreover, it is not necessarily an item within the group.
We're basically after:
$$ arg min_{x} sum_{i = 1}^{N} left| {s}_{i} - x right| $$
One should notice that $ frac{mathrm{d} left | x right | }{mathrm{d} x} = operatorname{sign} left( x right) $ (Being more rigorous would say it is a Sub Gradient of the non smooth $ {L}_{1} $ Norm function).
Hence, deriving the sum above yields $ sum_{i = 1}^{N} operatorname{sign} left( {s}_{i} - x right) $.
This equals to zero only when the number of positive items equals the number of negative which happens when $ x = operatorname{median} left{ {s}_{1}, {s}_{2}, cdots, {s}_{N} right} $.
One should notice that the median of a discrete group is not uniquely defined.
Moreover, it is not necessarily an item within the group.
edited Jul 31 at 5:49
answered Nov 16 '14 at 16:45
Royi
3,30012351
3,30012351
3
Using derivatives here is overkill; the problem can be done by more elementary methods. $qquad$
– Michael Hardy
Oct 28 '16 at 17:06
add a comment |
3
Using derivatives here is overkill; the problem can be done by more elementary methods. $qquad$
– Michael Hardy
Oct 28 '16 at 17:06
3
3
Using derivatives here is overkill; the problem can be done by more elementary methods. $qquad$
– Michael Hardy
Oct 28 '16 at 17:06
Using derivatives here is overkill; the problem can be done by more elementary methods. $qquad$
– Michael Hardy
Oct 28 '16 at 17:06
add a comment |
up vote
29
down vote
Suppose that the set $S$ has $n$ elements, $s_1<s_2<dots<s_n$. If $x<s_1$, then $$f(x)=sum_{sin S}|s-x|=sum_{sin S}(s-x)=sum_{k=1}^n(s_k-x);.tag{1}$$ As $x$ increases, each term of $(1)$ decreases until $x$ reaches $s_1$, therefore $f(s_1)<f(x)$ for all $x<s_1$.
Now suppose that $s_kle xle x+dle s_{k+1}$. Then
$$begin{align*}f(x+d)&=sum_{i=1}^kBig(x+d-s_iBig)+sum_{i=k+1}^nBig(s_i-(x+d)Big)\
&=dk+sum_{i=1}^k(x-s_i)-d(n-k)+sum_{i=k+1}^n(s_i-x)\
&=d(2k-n)+sum_{i=1}^k(x-s_i)+sum_{i=k+1}^n(s_i-x)\
&=d(2k-n)+f(x);,
end{align*}$$
so $f(x+d)-f(x)=d(2k-n)$. This is negative if $2k<n$, zero if $2k=n$, and positive if $2k>n$. Thus, on the interval $[s_k,s_{k+1}]$
$$f(x)text{ is }begin{cases}
text{decreasing},&text{if }2k<n\
text{constant},&text{if }2k=n\
text{increasing},&text{if }2k>n;.
end{cases}$$
From here it shouldn’t be too hard to show that $f(x)$ is minimal when $x$ is the median of $S$.
3
But a small typo. In "As x increases, each term of (1) decreases until x reaches x_1, so" You intended to say s_1 instead of x_1.
– Neo M Hacker
Sep 28 '17 at 3:23
add a comment |
up vote
29
down vote
Suppose that the set $S$ has $n$ elements, $s_1<s_2<dots<s_n$. If $x<s_1$, then $$f(x)=sum_{sin S}|s-x|=sum_{sin S}(s-x)=sum_{k=1}^n(s_k-x);.tag{1}$$ As $x$ increases, each term of $(1)$ decreases until $x$ reaches $s_1$, therefore $f(s_1)<f(x)$ for all $x<s_1$.
Now suppose that $s_kle xle x+dle s_{k+1}$. Then
$$begin{align*}f(x+d)&=sum_{i=1}^kBig(x+d-s_iBig)+sum_{i=k+1}^nBig(s_i-(x+d)Big)\
&=dk+sum_{i=1}^k(x-s_i)-d(n-k)+sum_{i=k+1}^n(s_i-x)\
&=d(2k-n)+sum_{i=1}^k(x-s_i)+sum_{i=k+1}^n(s_i-x)\
&=d(2k-n)+f(x);,
end{align*}$$
so $f(x+d)-f(x)=d(2k-n)$. This is negative if $2k<n$, zero if $2k=n$, and positive if $2k>n$. Thus, on the interval $[s_k,s_{k+1}]$
$$f(x)text{ is }begin{cases}
text{decreasing},&text{if }2k<n\
text{constant},&text{if }2k=n\
text{increasing},&text{if }2k>n;.
end{cases}$$
From here it shouldn’t be too hard to show that $f(x)$ is minimal when $x$ is the median of $S$.
3
But a small typo. In "As x increases, each term of (1) decreases until x reaches x_1, so" You intended to say s_1 instead of x_1.
– Neo M Hacker
Sep 28 '17 at 3:23
add a comment |
up vote
29
down vote
up vote
29
down vote
Suppose that the set $S$ has $n$ elements, $s_1<s_2<dots<s_n$. If $x<s_1$, then $$f(x)=sum_{sin S}|s-x|=sum_{sin S}(s-x)=sum_{k=1}^n(s_k-x);.tag{1}$$ As $x$ increases, each term of $(1)$ decreases until $x$ reaches $s_1$, therefore $f(s_1)<f(x)$ for all $x<s_1$.
Now suppose that $s_kle xle x+dle s_{k+1}$. Then
$$begin{align*}f(x+d)&=sum_{i=1}^kBig(x+d-s_iBig)+sum_{i=k+1}^nBig(s_i-(x+d)Big)\
&=dk+sum_{i=1}^k(x-s_i)-d(n-k)+sum_{i=k+1}^n(s_i-x)\
&=d(2k-n)+sum_{i=1}^k(x-s_i)+sum_{i=k+1}^n(s_i-x)\
&=d(2k-n)+f(x);,
end{align*}$$
so $f(x+d)-f(x)=d(2k-n)$. This is negative if $2k<n$, zero if $2k=n$, and positive if $2k>n$. Thus, on the interval $[s_k,s_{k+1}]$
$$f(x)text{ is }begin{cases}
text{decreasing},&text{if }2k<n\
text{constant},&text{if }2k=n\
text{increasing},&text{if }2k>n;.
end{cases}$$
From here it shouldn’t be too hard to show that $f(x)$ is minimal when $x$ is the median of $S$.
Suppose that the set $S$ has $n$ elements, $s_1<s_2<dots<s_n$. If $x<s_1$, then $$f(x)=sum_{sin S}|s-x|=sum_{sin S}(s-x)=sum_{k=1}^n(s_k-x);.tag{1}$$ As $x$ increases, each term of $(1)$ decreases until $x$ reaches $s_1$, therefore $f(s_1)<f(x)$ for all $x<s_1$.
Now suppose that $s_kle xle x+dle s_{k+1}$. Then
$$begin{align*}f(x+d)&=sum_{i=1}^kBig(x+d-s_iBig)+sum_{i=k+1}^nBig(s_i-(x+d)Big)\
&=dk+sum_{i=1}^k(x-s_i)-d(n-k)+sum_{i=k+1}^n(s_i-x)\
&=d(2k-n)+sum_{i=1}^k(x-s_i)+sum_{i=k+1}^n(s_i-x)\
&=d(2k-n)+f(x);,
end{align*}$$
so $f(x+d)-f(x)=d(2k-n)$. This is negative if $2k<n$, zero if $2k=n$, and positive if $2k>n$. Thus, on the interval $[s_k,s_{k+1}]$
$$f(x)text{ is }begin{cases}
text{decreasing},&text{if }2k<n\
text{constant},&text{if }2k=n\
text{increasing},&text{if }2k>n;.
end{cases}$$
From here it shouldn’t be too hard to show that $f(x)$ is minimal when $x$ is the median of $S$.
edited Nov 21 at 12:01
pgmank
1034
1034
answered Feb 25 '12 at 17:22
Brian M. Scott
454k38505906
454k38505906
3
But a small typo. In "As x increases, each term of (1) decreases until x reaches x_1, so" You intended to say s_1 instead of x_1.
– Neo M Hacker
Sep 28 '17 at 3:23
add a comment |
3
But a small typo. In "As x increases, each term of (1) decreases until x reaches x_1, so" You intended to say s_1 instead of x_1.
– Neo M Hacker
Sep 28 '17 at 3:23
3
3
But a small typo. In "As x increases, each term of (1) decreases until x reaches x_1, so" You intended to say s_1 instead of x_1.
– Neo M Hacker
Sep 28 '17 at 3:23
But a small typo. In "As x increases, each term of (1) decreases until x reaches x_1, so" You intended to say s_1 instead of x_1.
– Neo M Hacker
Sep 28 '17 at 3:23
add a comment |
up vote
10
down vote
You want the median of $n$ numbers. Say $x$ is bigger than $12$ of them and smaller than $8$ of them (so $n=20$). If $x$ increases, it's getting closer to $8$ of the numbers and farther from $12$ of them, so the sum of the distances gets greater. And if $x$ decreases, it's getting closer to $12$ of them and farther from $8$ of them, so the sum of the distances gets smaller.
A similar thing happens if $x$ is smaller than more of the $n$ numbers than $x$ is bigger than.
But if $x$ is smaller than $10$ of them and bigger than $10$ of them, then when $x$ moves, it's getting farther from $10$ of them and closer to just as many of them, so the sum of the distances is not changing.
So the sum of the distances is smallest when the number of data points less than $x$ is the same as the number of data points bigger than $x$.
add a comment |
up vote
10
down vote
You want the median of $n$ numbers. Say $x$ is bigger than $12$ of them and smaller than $8$ of them (so $n=20$). If $x$ increases, it's getting closer to $8$ of the numbers and farther from $12$ of them, so the sum of the distances gets greater. And if $x$ decreases, it's getting closer to $12$ of them and farther from $8$ of them, so the sum of the distances gets smaller.
A similar thing happens if $x$ is smaller than more of the $n$ numbers than $x$ is bigger than.
But if $x$ is smaller than $10$ of them and bigger than $10$ of them, then when $x$ moves, it's getting farther from $10$ of them and closer to just as many of them, so the sum of the distances is not changing.
So the sum of the distances is smallest when the number of data points less than $x$ is the same as the number of data points bigger than $x$.
add a comment |
up vote
10
down vote
up vote
10
down vote
You want the median of $n$ numbers. Say $x$ is bigger than $12$ of them and smaller than $8$ of them (so $n=20$). If $x$ increases, it's getting closer to $8$ of the numbers and farther from $12$ of them, so the sum of the distances gets greater. And if $x$ decreases, it's getting closer to $12$ of them and farther from $8$ of them, so the sum of the distances gets smaller.
A similar thing happens if $x$ is smaller than more of the $n$ numbers than $x$ is bigger than.
But if $x$ is smaller than $10$ of them and bigger than $10$ of them, then when $x$ moves, it's getting farther from $10$ of them and closer to just as many of them, so the sum of the distances is not changing.
So the sum of the distances is smallest when the number of data points less than $x$ is the same as the number of data points bigger than $x$.
You want the median of $n$ numbers. Say $x$ is bigger than $12$ of them and smaller than $8$ of them (so $n=20$). If $x$ increases, it's getting closer to $8$ of the numbers and farther from $12$ of them, so the sum of the distances gets greater. And if $x$ decreases, it's getting closer to $12$ of them and farther from $8$ of them, so the sum of the distances gets smaller.
A similar thing happens if $x$ is smaller than more of the $n$ numbers than $x$ is bigger than.
But if $x$ is smaller than $10$ of them and bigger than $10$ of them, then when $x$ moves, it's getting farther from $10$ of them and closer to just as many of them, so the sum of the distances is not changing.
So the sum of the distances is smallest when the number of data points less than $x$ is the same as the number of data points bigger than $x$.
edited Apr 12 '15 at 6:45
Lord_Farin
15.5k636108
15.5k636108
answered Feb 25 '12 at 22:37
Michael Hardy
1
1
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
6
down vote
Starting with $$f(x)=sum_{i=1}^n |s_i-x|$$
Assume we rearranged our terms such that $s_1<s_2<cdots<s_n$
We first proceed by making the following observation $$sum_{i=1}^n |s_i-x| = sum_{i=2}^{n-1} |s_i-x| +(s_n -s_1) quad text{when} quad x in [s_1,s_n]$$
Now suppose that $n$ is odd, then by applying the above identity repeatedly we get $$f(x)=sum_{i=1}^n |s_i-x|=|s_{frac{n+1}2}-x|+(s_n -s_1)+(s_{n-1}-s_2)+cdots+(s_{frac{n+3}2}-s_{frac{n-1}2})$$ or in other words $$f(x)=|s_{frac{n+1}{2}}-x|+text{constant}$$
This is just the absolute value function with its vertex being at $(s_{frac{n+1}{2}},text{constant})$, the minimum of the absolute value function occurs at its vertex, therefore $s_{frac{n+1}{2}}$(median) minmizes $f(x)$.
Now suppose $n$ is even, again by using our identity, we have $$f(x)=sum_{i=1}^n |s_i-x|=|s_{frac{n}2}-x|+|s_{frac{n+2}2}-x| + text{constant}$$
Where the minimum occurs at $f'(x)=0$(or when not defined), therefore by differentiating and setting $f'(x)$ to zero we get $$dfrac{|s_{frac{n}{2}}-x|}{s_{frac{n}{2}}-x}+dfrac{|s_{frac{n+2}{2}}-x|}{s_{frac{n+2}{2}}-x}=0$$
Observe that $s:=dfrac{s_{frac{n+2}{2}}+s_{frac{n}{2}}}{2}$(median) satisfies the above equation, since $s$ is halfway between $s_{frac{n}{2}}$ and $s_{frac{n+2}{2}}$ $$s_{frac{n}{2}}-s=-(s_{frac{n+2}{2}}-s)$$ that is by setting $x=s$ we get $$dfrac{|s_{frac{n}{2}}-s|}{s_{frac{n}{2}}-s}+dfrac{|s_{frac{n}{2}}-s|}{-(s_{frac{n}{2}}-s)}=0$$
Therefore $s$ is a minimum.
I think some theory about minimum being where $f'(x) = 0$ for non differentiable functions is needed here
– Guerlando OCs
Aug 27 at 0:56
add a comment |
up vote
6
down vote
Starting with $$f(x)=sum_{i=1}^n |s_i-x|$$
Assume we rearranged our terms such that $s_1<s_2<cdots<s_n$
We first proceed by making the following observation $$sum_{i=1}^n |s_i-x| = sum_{i=2}^{n-1} |s_i-x| +(s_n -s_1) quad text{when} quad x in [s_1,s_n]$$
Now suppose that $n$ is odd, then by applying the above identity repeatedly we get $$f(x)=sum_{i=1}^n |s_i-x|=|s_{frac{n+1}2}-x|+(s_n -s_1)+(s_{n-1}-s_2)+cdots+(s_{frac{n+3}2}-s_{frac{n-1}2})$$ or in other words $$f(x)=|s_{frac{n+1}{2}}-x|+text{constant}$$
This is just the absolute value function with its vertex being at $(s_{frac{n+1}{2}},text{constant})$, the minimum of the absolute value function occurs at its vertex, therefore $s_{frac{n+1}{2}}$(median) minmizes $f(x)$.
Now suppose $n$ is even, again by using our identity, we have $$f(x)=sum_{i=1}^n |s_i-x|=|s_{frac{n}2}-x|+|s_{frac{n+2}2}-x| + text{constant}$$
Where the minimum occurs at $f'(x)=0$(or when not defined), therefore by differentiating and setting $f'(x)$ to zero we get $$dfrac{|s_{frac{n}{2}}-x|}{s_{frac{n}{2}}-x}+dfrac{|s_{frac{n+2}{2}}-x|}{s_{frac{n+2}{2}}-x}=0$$
Observe that $s:=dfrac{s_{frac{n+2}{2}}+s_{frac{n}{2}}}{2}$(median) satisfies the above equation, since $s$ is halfway between $s_{frac{n}{2}}$ and $s_{frac{n+2}{2}}$ $$s_{frac{n}{2}}-s=-(s_{frac{n+2}{2}}-s)$$ that is by setting $x=s$ we get $$dfrac{|s_{frac{n}{2}}-s|}{s_{frac{n}{2}}-s}+dfrac{|s_{frac{n}{2}}-s|}{-(s_{frac{n}{2}}-s)}=0$$
Therefore $s$ is a minimum.
I think some theory about minimum being where $f'(x) = 0$ for non differentiable functions is needed here
– Guerlando OCs
Aug 27 at 0:56
add a comment |
up vote
6
down vote
up vote
6
down vote
Starting with $$f(x)=sum_{i=1}^n |s_i-x|$$
Assume we rearranged our terms such that $s_1<s_2<cdots<s_n$
We first proceed by making the following observation $$sum_{i=1}^n |s_i-x| = sum_{i=2}^{n-1} |s_i-x| +(s_n -s_1) quad text{when} quad x in [s_1,s_n]$$
Now suppose that $n$ is odd, then by applying the above identity repeatedly we get $$f(x)=sum_{i=1}^n |s_i-x|=|s_{frac{n+1}2}-x|+(s_n -s_1)+(s_{n-1}-s_2)+cdots+(s_{frac{n+3}2}-s_{frac{n-1}2})$$ or in other words $$f(x)=|s_{frac{n+1}{2}}-x|+text{constant}$$
This is just the absolute value function with its vertex being at $(s_{frac{n+1}{2}},text{constant})$, the minimum of the absolute value function occurs at its vertex, therefore $s_{frac{n+1}{2}}$(median) minmizes $f(x)$.
Now suppose $n$ is even, again by using our identity, we have $$f(x)=sum_{i=1}^n |s_i-x|=|s_{frac{n}2}-x|+|s_{frac{n+2}2}-x| + text{constant}$$
Where the minimum occurs at $f'(x)=0$(or when not defined), therefore by differentiating and setting $f'(x)$ to zero we get $$dfrac{|s_{frac{n}{2}}-x|}{s_{frac{n}{2}}-x}+dfrac{|s_{frac{n+2}{2}}-x|}{s_{frac{n+2}{2}}-x}=0$$
Observe that $s:=dfrac{s_{frac{n+2}{2}}+s_{frac{n}{2}}}{2}$(median) satisfies the above equation, since $s$ is halfway between $s_{frac{n}{2}}$ and $s_{frac{n+2}{2}}$ $$s_{frac{n}{2}}-s=-(s_{frac{n+2}{2}}-s)$$ that is by setting $x=s$ we get $$dfrac{|s_{frac{n}{2}}-s|}{s_{frac{n}{2}}-s}+dfrac{|s_{frac{n}{2}}-s|}{-(s_{frac{n}{2}}-s)}=0$$
Therefore $s$ is a minimum.
Starting with $$f(x)=sum_{i=1}^n |s_i-x|$$
Assume we rearranged our terms such that $s_1<s_2<cdots<s_n$
We first proceed by making the following observation $$sum_{i=1}^n |s_i-x| = sum_{i=2}^{n-1} |s_i-x| +(s_n -s_1) quad text{when} quad x in [s_1,s_n]$$
Now suppose that $n$ is odd, then by applying the above identity repeatedly we get $$f(x)=sum_{i=1}^n |s_i-x|=|s_{frac{n+1}2}-x|+(s_n -s_1)+(s_{n-1}-s_2)+cdots+(s_{frac{n+3}2}-s_{frac{n-1}2})$$ or in other words $$f(x)=|s_{frac{n+1}{2}}-x|+text{constant}$$
This is just the absolute value function with its vertex being at $(s_{frac{n+1}{2}},text{constant})$, the minimum of the absolute value function occurs at its vertex, therefore $s_{frac{n+1}{2}}$(median) minmizes $f(x)$.
Now suppose $n$ is even, again by using our identity, we have $$f(x)=sum_{i=1}^n |s_i-x|=|s_{frac{n}2}-x|+|s_{frac{n+2}2}-x| + text{constant}$$
Where the minimum occurs at $f'(x)=0$(or when not defined), therefore by differentiating and setting $f'(x)$ to zero we get $$dfrac{|s_{frac{n}{2}}-x|}{s_{frac{n}{2}}-x}+dfrac{|s_{frac{n+2}{2}}-x|}{s_{frac{n+2}{2}}-x}=0$$
Observe that $s:=dfrac{s_{frac{n+2}{2}}+s_{frac{n}{2}}}{2}$(median) satisfies the above equation, since $s$ is halfway between $s_{frac{n}{2}}$ and $s_{frac{n+2}{2}}$ $$s_{frac{n}{2}}-s=-(s_{frac{n+2}{2}}-s)$$ that is by setting $x=s$ we get $$dfrac{|s_{frac{n}{2}}-s|}{s_{frac{n}{2}}-s}+dfrac{|s_{frac{n}{2}}-s|}{-(s_{frac{n}{2}}-s)}=0$$
Therefore $s$ is a minimum.
edited Mar 25 '17 at 1:16
Michael Hardy
1
1
answered Jul 17 '16 at 22:01
Omar Nagib
603514
603514
I think some theory about minimum being where $f'(x) = 0$ for non differentiable functions is needed here
– Guerlando OCs
Aug 27 at 0:56
add a comment |
I think some theory about minimum being where $f'(x) = 0$ for non differentiable functions is needed here
– Guerlando OCs
Aug 27 at 0:56
I think some theory about minimum being where $f'(x) = 0$ for non differentiable functions is needed here
– Guerlando OCs
Aug 27 at 0:56
I think some theory about minimum being where $f'(x) = 0$ for non differentiable functions is needed here
– Guerlando OCs
Aug 27 at 0:56
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
Consider two $x_i$'s $x_1$ and $x_2$,
For $x_1leq aleq x_2$, $sum_{i=1}^{2}|x_i-a|=|x_1-a|+|x_2-a|=a-x_1+x_2-a=x_2-x_1$
For $alt x_1$, $sum_{i=1}^{2}|x_i-a|=x_1-a+x_2-a=x_1+x_2-2agt x_1+x_2-2x_1=x_2-x_1$
For $agt x_2$,$sum_{i=1}^{2}|x_i-a|=-x_1+a-x_2+a=-x_1-x_2+2agt -x_1-x_2+2x_2=x_2-x_1$
$implies$for any two $x_i$'s the sum of the absolute values of the deviations is minimum when $x_1leq aleq x_2$ or $ain[x_1,x_2]$.
When $n$ is odd,
$$
sum_{i=1}^{n}|x_i-a|=|x_1-a|+|x_2-a|+....+|x_{tfrac{n-1}{2}}-a|+|x_{tfrac{n+1}{2}}-a|+|x_{tfrac{n+3}{2}}-a|+....+|x_{n-1}-a|+|x_n-a|
$$
consider the intervals $[x_1,x_n], [x_2,x_{n-1}], [x_3,x_{n-2}],....,[x_{tfrac{n-1}{2}},x_{tfrac{n+3}{2}}]$. If $a$ is a member of all these intervals. i.e,$[x_{tfrac{n-1}{2}},x_{tfrac{n+3}{2}}]$,
using the above theorem, we can say that all the terms in the sum except $|x_{tfrac{n+1}{2}}-a|$ are minimized. So
$$
sum_{i=1}^{n}|x_i-a|=(x_n-x_1)+(x_{n-1}-x_2)+(x_{n-2}-x_3)+....+(x_{tfrac{n+3}{2}}-x_{tfrac{n-1}{2}})+|x_{tfrac{n+1}{2}}-a|=|x_{tfrac{n+1}{2}}-a|+text{costant}
$$
Now since the derivative of modulus function is signum function, $f'(a)=text{sgn}(x_{tfrac{n+1}{2}}-a)=0$ for $a=x_{tfrac{n+1}{2}}=text{Median}$
$implies$ When $n$ is odd,the median minimizes the sum of absolute values of the deviations.
When $n$ is even,
$$
sum_{i=1}^{n}|x_i-a|=|x_1-a|+|x_2-a|+....+|x_{tfrac{n}{2}}-a|+|x_{tfrac{n}{2}+1}-a|+....+|x_{n-1}-a|+|x_n-a|\
$$
If $a$ is a member of all the intervals $[x_1,x_n], [x_2,x_{n-1}], [x_3,x_{n-2}],....,[x_{tfrac{n}{2}},x_{tfrac{n}{2}+1}]$, i.e, $ain[x_{tfrac{n}{2}},x_{tfrac{n}{2}+1}]$,
$$
sum_{i=1}^{n}|x_i-a|=(x_n-x_1)+(x_{n-1}-x_2)+(x_{n-2}-x_3)+....+(x_{tfrac{n}{2}+1}-x_{tfrac{n}{2}})
$$
$implies$ When $n$ is even, any number in the interval $[x_{tfrac{n}{2}},x_{tfrac{n}{2}+1}]$, i.e, including the median, minimizes the sum of absolute values of the deviations. For example consider the series:$2, 4, 5, 10$, median, $M=4.5$.
$$
sum_{i=1}^4|x_i-M|=2.5+0.5+0.5+5.5=9
$$
If you take any other value in the interval $[x_{tfrac{n}{2}},x_{tfrac{n}{2}+1}]=[4,5]$, say 4.1
$$
sum_{i=1}^4|x_i-4.1|=2.1+0.1+0.9+5.9=9
$$
For any value outside the interval $[x_{tfrac{n}{2}},x_{tfrac{n}{2}+1}]=[4,5]$, say 5.2
$$
sum_{i=1}^4|x_i-5.2|=3.2+1.2+0.2+4.8=9.4
$$
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
Consider two $x_i$'s $x_1$ and $x_2$,
For $x_1leq aleq x_2$, $sum_{i=1}^{2}|x_i-a|=|x_1-a|+|x_2-a|=a-x_1+x_2-a=x_2-x_1$
For $alt x_1$, $sum_{i=1}^{2}|x_i-a|=x_1-a+x_2-a=x_1+x_2-2agt x_1+x_2-2x_1=x_2-x_1$
For $agt x_2$,$sum_{i=1}^{2}|x_i-a|=-x_1+a-x_2+a=-x_1-x_2+2agt -x_1-x_2+2x_2=x_2-x_1$
$implies$for any two $x_i$'s the sum of the absolute values of the deviations is minimum when $x_1leq aleq x_2$ or $ain[x_1,x_2]$.
When $n$ is odd,
$$
sum_{i=1}^{n}|x_i-a|=|x_1-a|+|x_2-a|+....+|x_{tfrac{n-1}{2}}-a|+|x_{tfrac{n+1}{2}}-a|+|x_{tfrac{n+3}{2}}-a|+....+|x_{n-1}-a|+|x_n-a|
$$
consider the intervals $[x_1,x_n], [x_2,x_{n-1}], [x_3,x_{n-2}],....,[x_{tfrac{n-1}{2}},x_{tfrac{n+3}{2}}]$. If $a$ is a member of all these intervals. i.e,$[x_{tfrac{n-1}{2}},x_{tfrac{n+3}{2}}]$,
using the above theorem, we can say that all the terms in the sum except $|x_{tfrac{n+1}{2}}-a|$ are minimized. So
$$
sum_{i=1}^{n}|x_i-a|=(x_n-x_1)+(x_{n-1}-x_2)+(x_{n-2}-x_3)+....+(x_{tfrac{n+3}{2}}-x_{tfrac{n-1}{2}})+|x_{tfrac{n+1}{2}}-a|=|x_{tfrac{n+1}{2}}-a|+text{costant}
$$
Now since the derivative of modulus function is signum function, $f'(a)=text{sgn}(x_{tfrac{n+1}{2}}-a)=0$ for $a=x_{tfrac{n+1}{2}}=text{Median}$
$implies$ When $n$ is odd,the median minimizes the sum of absolute values of the deviations.
When $n$ is even,
$$
sum_{i=1}^{n}|x_i-a|=|x_1-a|+|x_2-a|+....+|x_{tfrac{n}{2}}-a|+|x_{tfrac{n}{2}+1}-a|+....+|x_{n-1}-a|+|x_n-a|\
$$
If $a$ is a member of all the intervals $[x_1,x_n], [x_2,x_{n-1}], [x_3,x_{n-2}],....,[x_{tfrac{n}{2}},x_{tfrac{n}{2}+1}]$, i.e, $ain[x_{tfrac{n}{2}},x_{tfrac{n}{2}+1}]$,
$$
sum_{i=1}^{n}|x_i-a|=(x_n-x_1)+(x_{n-1}-x_2)+(x_{n-2}-x_3)+....+(x_{tfrac{n}{2}+1}-x_{tfrac{n}{2}})
$$
$implies$ When $n$ is even, any number in the interval $[x_{tfrac{n}{2}},x_{tfrac{n}{2}+1}]$, i.e, including the median, minimizes the sum of absolute values of the deviations. For example consider the series:$2, 4, 5, 10$, median, $M=4.5$.
$$
sum_{i=1}^4|x_i-M|=2.5+0.5+0.5+5.5=9
$$
If you take any other value in the interval $[x_{tfrac{n}{2}},x_{tfrac{n}{2}+1}]=[4,5]$, say 4.1
$$
sum_{i=1}^4|x_i-4.1|=2.1+0.1+0.9+5.9=9
$$
For any value outside the interval $[x_{tfrac{n}{2}},x_{tfrac{n}{2}+1}]=[4,5]$, say 5.2
$$
sum_{i=1}^4|x_i-5.2|=3.2+1.2+0.2+4.8=9.4
$$
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
up vote
3
down vote
Consider two $x_i$'s $x_1$ and $x_2$,
For $x_1leq aleq x_2$, $sum_{i=1}^{2}|x_i-a|=|x_1-a|+|x_2-a|=a-x_1+x_2-a=x_2-x_1$
For $alt x_1$, $sum_{i=1}^{2}|x_i-a|=x_1-a+x_2-a=x_1+x_2-2agt x_1+x_2-2x_1=x_2-x_1$
For $agt x_2$,$sum_{i=1}^{2}|x_i-a|=-x_1+a-x_2+a=-x_1-x_2+2agt -x_1-x_2+2x_2=x_2-x_1$
$implies$for any two $x_i$'s the sum of the absolute values of the deviations is minimum when $x_1leq aleq x_2$ or $ain[x_1,x_2]$.
When $n$ is odd,
$$
sum_{i=1}^{n}|x_i-a|=|x_1-a|+|x_2-a|+....+|x_{tfrac{n-1}{2}}-a|+|x_{tfrac{n+1}{2}}-a|+|x_{tfrac{n+3}{2}}-a|+....+|x_{n-1}-a|+|x_n-a|
$$
consider the intervals $[x_1,x_n], [x_2,x_{n-1}], [x_3,x_{n-2}],....,[x_{tfrac{n-1}{2}},x_{tfrac{n+3}{2}}]$. If $a$ is a member of all these intervals. i.e,$[x_{tfrac{n-1}{2}},x_{tfrac{n+3}{2}}]$,
using the above theorem, we can say that all the terms in the sum except $|x_{tfrac{n+1}{2}}-a|$ are minimized. So
$$
sum_{i=1}^{n}|x_i-a|=(x_n-x_1)+(x_{n-1}-x_2)+(x_{n-2}-x_3)+....+(x_{tfrac{n+3}{2}}-x_{tfrac{n-1}{2}})+|x_{tfrac{n+1}{2}}-a|=|x_{tfrac{n+1}{2}}-a|+text{costant}
$$
Now since the derivative of modulus function is signum function, $f'(a)=text{sgn}(x_{tfrac{n+1}{2}}-a)=0$ for $a=x_{tfrac{n+1}{2}}=text{Median}$
$implies$ When $n$ is odd,the median minimizes the sum of absolute values of the deviations.
When $n$ is even,
$$
sum_{i=1}^{n}|x_i-a|=|x_1-a|+|x_2-a|+....+|x_{tfrac{n}{2}}-a|+|x_{tfrac{n}{2}+1}-a|+....+|x_{n-1}-a|+|x_n-a|\
$$
If $a$ is a member of all the intervals $[x_1,x_n], [x_2,x_{n-1}], [x_3,x_{n-2}],....,[x_{tfrac{n}{2}},x_{tfrac{n}{2}+1}]$, i.e, $ain[x_{tfrac{n}{2}},x_{tfrac{n}{2}+1}]$,
$$
sum_{i=1}^{n}|x_i-a|=(x_n-x_1)+(x_{n-1}-x_2)+(x_{n-2}-x_3)+....+(x_{tfrac{n}{2}+1}-x_{tfrac{n}{2}})
$$
$implies$ When $n$ is even, any number in the interval $[x_{tfrac{n}{2}},x_{tfrac{n}{2}+1}]$, i.e, including the median, minimizes the sum of absolute values of the deviations. For example consider the series:$2, 4, 5, 10$, median, $M=4.5$.
$$
sum_{i=1}^4|x_i-M|=2.5+0.5+0.5+5.5=9
$$
If you take any other value in the interval $[x_{tfrac{n}{2}},x_{tfrac{n}{2}+1}]=[4,5]$, say 4.1
$$
sum_{i=1}^4|x_i-4.1|=2.1+0.1+0.9+5.9=9
$$
For any value outside the interval $[x_{tfrac{n}{2}},x_{tfrac{n}{2}+1}]=[4,5]$, say 5.2
$$
sum_{i=1}^4|x_i-5.2|=3.2+1.2+0.2+4.8=9.4
$$
Consider two $x_i$'s $x_1$ and $x_2$,
For $x_1leq aleq x_2$, $sum_{i=1}^{2}|x_i-a|=|x_1-a|+|x_2-a|=a-x_1+x_2-a=x_2-x_1$
For $alt x_1$, $sum_{i=1}^{2}|x_i-a|=x_1-a+x_2-a=x_1+x_2-2agt x_1+x_2-2x_1=x_2-x_1$
For $agt x_2$,$sum_{i=1}^{2}|x_i-a|=-x_1+a-x_2+a=-x_1-x_2+2agt -x_1-x_2+2x_2=x_2-x_1$
$implies$for any two $x_i$'s the sum of the absolute values of the deviations is minimum when $x_1leq aleq x_2$ or $ain[x_1,x_2]$.
When $n$ is odd,
$$
sum_{i=1}^{n}|x_i-a|=|x_1-a|+|x_2-a|+....+|x_{tfrac{n-1}{2}}-a|+|x_{tfrac{n+1}{2}}-a|+|x_{tfrac{n+3}{2}}-a|+....+|x_{n-1}-a|+|x_n-a|
$$
consider the intervals $[x_1,x_n], [x_2,x_{n-1}], [x_3,x_{n-2}],....,[x_{tfrac{n-1}{2}},x_{tfrac{n+3}{2}}]$. If $a$ is a member of all these intervals. i.e,$[x_{tfrac{n-1}{2}},x_{tfrac{n+3}{2}}]$,
using the above theorem, we can say that all the terms in the sum except $|x_{tfrac{n+1}{2}}-a|$ are minimized. So
$$
sum_{i=1}^{n}|x_i-a|=(x_n-x_1)+(x_{n-1}-x_2)+(x_{n-2}-x_3)+....+(x_{tfrac{n+3}{2}}-x_{tfrac{n-1}{2}})+|x_{tfrac{n+1}{2}}-a|=|x_{tfrac{n+1}{2}}-a|+text{costant}
$$
Now since the derivative of modulus function is signum function, $f'(a)=text{sgn}(x_{tfrac{n+1}{2}}-a)=0$ for $a=x_{tfrac{n+1}{2}}=text{Median}$
$implies$ When $n$ is odd,the median minimizes the sum of absolute values of the deviations.
When $n$ is even,
$$
sum_{i=1}^{n}|x_i-a|=|x_1-a|+|x_2-a|+....+|x_{tfrac{n}{2}}-a|+|x_{tfrac{n}{2}+1}-a|+....+|x_{n-1}-a|+|x_n-a|\
$$
If $a$ is a member of all the intervals $[x_1,x_n], [x_2,x_{n-1}], [x_3,x_{n-2}],....,[x_{tfrac{n}{2}},x_{tfrac{n}{2}+1}]$, i.e, $ain[x_{tfrac{n}{2}},x_{tfrac{n}{2}+1}]$,
$$
sum_{i=1}^{n}|x_i-a|=(x_n-x_1)+(x_{n-1}-x_2)+(x_{n-2}-x_3)+....+(x_{tfrac{n}{2}+1}-x_{tfrac{n}{2}})
$$
$implies$ When $n$ is even, any number in the interval $[x_{tfrac{n}{2}},x_{tfrac{n}{2}+1}]$, i.e, including the median, minimizes the sum of absolute values of the deviations. For example consider the series:$2, 4, 5, 10$, median, $M=4.5$.
$$
sum_{i=1}^4|x_i-M|=2.5+0.5+0.5+5.5=9
$$
If you take any other value in the interval $[x_{tfrac{n}{2}},x_{tfrac{n}{2}+1}]=[4,5]$, say 4.1
$$
sum_{i=1}^4|x_i-4.1|=2.1+0.1+0.9+5.9=9
$$
For any value outside the interval $[x_{tfrac{n}{2}},x_{tfrac{n}{2}+1}]=[4,5]$, say 5.2
$$
sum_{i=1}^4|x_i-5.2|=3.2+1.2+0.2+4.8=9.4
$$
edited Jul 20 '17 at 14:59
answered Jul 20 '17 at 11:32
ss1729
1,753722
1,753722
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
Suppose $S$ is finite (with cardinal $s$), without repetitions, and ordered. Then the sum of absolute values is continuous (sum of continuous functions), and piecewise linear (hence differentiable), with left-most slope $-s$. By induction, the slope increases by 2 for each interval from left to right, with right-most slope $+s$. Hence the piece-wise slope first reaches either $-1$ or $0$ at index $leftlfloor frac{s+1}{2}rightrfloor$, and $0$ or $+1$ at index $leftlceil frac{s+1}{2}rightrceil$.
Hence the function attains its minima in the interval $left[leftlfloor frac{s+1}{2}rightrfloor, leftlceil frac{s+1}{2}rightrceilright]$, which reduces to a singleton when $s$ is odd.
The notion of median for continuous functions is detailed in Sunny Garlang Noah, The Median of a Continuous Function, Real Anal. Exchange, 2007
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
Suppose $S$ is finite (with cardinal $s$), without repetitions, and ordered. Then the sum of absolute values is continuous (sum of continuous functions), and piecewise linear (hence differentiable), with left-most slope $-s$. By induction, the slope increases by 2 for each interval from left to right, with right-most slope $+s$. Hence the piece-wise slope first reaches either $-1$ or $0$ at index $leftlfloor frac{s+1}{2}rightrfloor$, and $0$ or $+1$ at index $leftlceil frac{s+1}{2}rightrceil$.
Hence the function attains its minima in the interval $left[leftlfloor frac{s+1}{2}rightrfloor, leftlceil frac{s+1}{2}rightrceilright]$, which reduces to a singleton when $s$ is odd.
The notion of median for continuous functions is detailed in Sunny Garlang Noah, The Median of a Continuous Function, Real Anal. Exchange, 2007
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
Suppose $S$ is finite (with cardinal $s$), without repetitions, and ordered. Then the sum of absolute values is continuous (sum of continuous functions), and piecewise linear (hence differentiable), with left-most slope $-s$. By induction, the slope increases by 2 for each interval from left to right, with right-most slope $+s$. Hence the piece-wise slope first reaches either $-1$ or $0$ at index $leftlfloor frac{s+1}{2}rightrfloor$, and $0$ or $+1$ at index $leftlceil frac{s+1}{2}rightrceil$.
Hence the function attains its minima in the interval $left[leftlfloor frac{s+1}{2}rightrfloor, leftlceil frac{s+1}{2}rightrceilright]$, which reduces to a singleton when $s$ is odd.
The notion of median for continuous functions is detailed in Sunny Garlang Noah, The Median of a Continuous Function, Real Anal. Exchange, 2007
Suppose $S$ is finite (with cardinal $s$), without repetitions, and ordered. Then the sum of absolute values is continuous (sum of continuous functions), and piecewise linear (hence differentiable), with left-most slope $-s$. By induction, the slope increases by 2 for each interval from left to right, with right-most slope $+s$. Hence the piece-wise slope first reaches either $-1$ or $0$ at index $leftlfloor frac{s+1}{2}rightrfloor$, and $0$ or $+1$ at index $leftlceil frac{s+1}{2}rightrceil$.
Hence the function attains its minima in the interval $left[leftlfloor frac{s+1}{2}rightrfloor, leftlceil frac{s+1}{2}rightrceilright]$, which reduces to a singleton when $s$ is odd.
The notion of median for continuous functions is detailed in Sunny Garlang Noah, The Median of a Continuous Function, Real Anal. Exchange, 2007
edited Dec 1 '15 at 13:16
answered Dec 1 '15 at 11:42
Laurent Duval
5,26811239
5,26811239
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
Consider two real numbers $a<b$. Then the objective becomes
$$dist(a,b) = |x-a|+|x-b|$$
This expression is minimum when $aleq x leq b$. It can be proved by calculating the objective on 3 cases ($x<a, aleq xleq b, x>b$).
Now consider the general case where $S$ has $n$ elements. Sort them in increasing order as $S_1, S_2, ldots, S_n$.
Pair the smallest and the largest numbers. As explained above, $dist(S_1,S_n)$ is minimum when $S_1leq xleq S_n$. Remove these two elements from the list and continue this procedure until there is at most one element left in the set.
If there is an element $S_i$ left, then $x=S_i$ minimizes $dist(x-S_i)$. It also lies between all the pairs.
In the case of even elements, finally the sequence will be empty. As in the case above, median lies between all the pairs.
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
Consider two real numbers $a<b$. Then the objective becomes
$$dist(a,b) = |x-a|+|x-b|$$
This expression is minimum when $aleq x leq b$. It can be proved by calculating the objective on 3 cases ($x<a, aleq xleq b, x>b$).
Now consider the general case where $S$ has $n$ elements. Sort them in increasing order as $S_1, S_2, ldots, S_n$.
Pair the smallest and the largest numbers. As explained above, $dist(S_1,S_n)$ is minimum when $S_1leq xleq S_n$. Remove these two elements from the list and continue this procedure until there is at most one element left in the set.
If there is an element $S_i$ left, then $x=S_i$ minimizes $dist(x-S_i)$. It also lies between all the pairs.
In the case of even elements, finally the sequence will be empty. As in the case above, median lies between all the pairs.
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
Consider two real numbers $a<b$. Then the objective becomes
$$dist(a,b) = |x-a|+|x-b|$$
This expression is minimum when $aleq x leq b$. It can be proved by calculating the objective on 3 cases ($x<a, aleq xleq b, x>b$).
Now consider the general case where $S$ has $n$ elements. Sort them in increasing order as $S_1, S_2, ldots, S_n$.
Pair the smallest and the largest numbers. As explained above, $dist(S_1,S_n)$ is minimum when $S_1leq xleq S_n$. Remove these two elements from the list and continue this procedure until there is at most one element left in the set.
If there is an element $S_i$ left, then $x=S_i$ minimizes $dist(x-S_i)$. It also lies between all the pairs.
In the case of even elements, finally the sequence will be empty. As in the case above, median lies between all the pairs.
Consider two real numbers $a<b$. Then the objective becomes
$$dist(a,b) = |x-a|+|x-b|$$
This expression is minimum when $aleq x leq b$. It can be proved by calculating the objective on 3 cases ($x<a, aleq xleq b, x>b$).
Now consider the general case where $S$ has $n$ elements. Sort them in increasing order as $S_1, S_2, ldots, S_n$.
Pair the smallest and the largest numbers. As explained above, $dist(S_1,S_n)$ is minimum when $S_1leq xleq S_n$. Remove these two elements from the list and continue this procedure until there is at most one element left in the set.
If there is an element $S_i$ left, then $x=S_i$ minimizes $dist(x-S_i)$. It also lies between all the pairs.
In the case of even elements, finally the sequence will be empty. As in the case above, median lies between all the pairs.
edited Oct 27 '17 at 5:08
answered Oct 27 '17 at 4:57
foo
113
113
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f113270%2fthe-median-minimizes-the-sum-of-absolute-deviations-the-l-1-norm%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
13
Please replace THE median by ANY median.
– Did
Feb 25 '12 at 18:47