Can I take the vector space generated by {$1 , x, x^2$} over the field $F_3$?












1












$begingroup$


Let $V$ be the vector space over the field $F_3$ (field with $3$ elements) of dimension $3$. Define an action of the symmetric group $S_3$ on $V$ by $sigma.e_i$= $e_{sigma (i)}$ where {$e_1$, $e_2$, $e_3$} is a basis for $V$.



Can anyone please make me understand what this problem is saying?



I do not understand what is a vector space over the field $F_3$ (field with $3$ elements) ?
Can I take the vector space generated by {$1 , x, x^2$} over the field $F_3$?



If the action is only on he basis elements then how would we find the operations like $ sigma (e_1 + e_2)$?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Look up the definition of a vector space over an arbitrary field $K$ and then just take $K=Bbb{F}_3$.
    $endgroup$
    – Dietrich Burde
    Dec 6 '18 at 16:31










  • $begingroup$
    I did not get you.. Can you please go through my whole question?@DietrichBurde
    $endgroup$
    – cmi
    Dec 6 '18 at 16:54










  • $begingroup$
    I meant your statement "I do not understand what is a vector space over the field $Bbb{F}_3$". This is just the definition.
    $endgroup$
    – Dietrich Burde
    Dec 6 '18 at 17:59
















1












$begingroup$


Let $V$ be the vector space over the field $F_3$ (field with $3$ elements) of dimension $3$. Define an action of the symmetric group $S_3$ on $V$ by $sigma.e_i$= $e_{sigma (i)}$ where {$e_1$, $e_2$, $e_3$} is a basis for $V$.



Can anyone please make me understand what this problem is saying?



I do not understand what is a vector space over the field $F_3$ (field with $3$ elements) ?
Can I take the vector space generated by {$1 , x, x^2$} over the field $F_3$?



If the action is only on he basis elements then how would we find the operations like $ sigma (e_1 + e_2)$?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Look up the definition of a vector space over an arbitrary field $K$ and then just take $K=Bbb{F}_3$.
    $endgroup$
    – Dietrich Burde
    Dec 6 '18 at 16:31










  • $begingroup$
    I did not get you.. Can you please go through my whole question?@DietrichBurde
    $endgroup$
    – cmi
    Dec 6 '18 at 16:54










  • $begingroup$
    I meant your statement "I do not understand what is a vector space over the field $Bbb{F}_3$". This is just the definition.
    $endgroup$
    – Dietrich Burde
    Dec 6 '18 at 17:59














1












1








1





$begingroup$


Let $V$ be the vector space over the field $F_3$ (field with $3$ elements) of dimension $3$. Define an action of the symmetric group $S_3$ on $V$ by $sigma.e_i$= $e_{sigma (i)}$ where {$e_1$, $e_2$, $e_3$} is a basis for $V$.



Can anyone please make me understand what this problem is saying?



I do not understand what is a vector space over the field $F_3$ (field with $3$ elements) ?
Can I take the vector space generated by {$1 , x, x^2$} over the field $F_3$?



If the action is only on he basis elements then how would we find the operations like $ sigma (e_1 + e_2)$?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




Let $V$ be the vector space over the field $F_3$ (field with $3$ elements) of dimension $3$. Define an action of the symmetric group $S_3$ on $V$ by $sigma.e_i$= $e_{sigma (i)}$ where {$e_1$, $e_2$, $e_3$} is a basis for $V$.



Can anyone please make me understand what this problem is saying?



I do not understand what is a vector space over the field $F_3$ (field with $3$ elements) ?
Can I take the vector space generated by {$1 , x, x^2$} over the field $F_3$?



If the action is only on he basis elements then how would we find the operations like $ sigma (e_1 + e_2)$?







linear-algebra abstract-algebra group-theory vector-spaces group-actions






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Dec 6 '18 at 16:25









cmicmi

1,136212




1,136212












  • $begingroup$
    Look up the definition of a vector space over an arbitrary field $K$ and then just take $K=Bbb{F}_3$.
    $endgroup$
    – Dietrich Burde
    Dec 6 '18 at 16:31










  • $begingroup$
    I did not get you.. Can you please go through my whole question?@DietrichBurde
    $endgroup$
    – cmi
    Dec 6 '18 at 16:54










  • $begingroup$
    I meant your statement "I do not understand what is a vector space over the field $Bbb{F}_3$". This is just the definition.
    $endgroup$
    – Dietrich Burde
    Dec 6 '18 at 17:59


















  • $begingroup$
    Look up the definition of a vector space over an arbitrary field $K$ and then just take $K=Bbb{F}_3$.
    $endgroup$
    – Dietrich Burde
    Dec 6 '18 at 16:31










  • $begingroup$
    I did not get you.. Can you please go through my whole question?@DietrichBurde
    $endgroup$
    – cmi
    Dec 6 '18 at 16:54










  • $begingroup$
    I meant your statement "I do not understand what is a vector space over the field $Bbb{F}_3$". This is just the definition.
    $endgroup$
    – Dietrich Burde
    Dec 6 '18 at 17:59
















$begingroup$
Look up the definition of a vector space over an arbitrary field $K$ and then just take $K=Bbb{F}_3$.
$endgroup$
– Dietrich Burde
Dec 6 '18 at 16:31




$begingroup$
Look up the definition of a vector space over an arbitrary field $K$ and then just take $K=Bbb{F}_3$.
$endgroup$
– Dietrich Burde
Dec 6 '18 at 16:31












$begingroup$
I did not get you.. Can you please go through my whole question?@DietrichBurde
$endgroup$
– cmi
Dec 6 '18 at 16:54




$begingroup$
I did not get you.. Can you please go through my whole question?@DietrichBurde
$endgroup$
– cmi
Dec 6 '18 at 16:54












$begingroup$
I meant your statement "I do not understand what is a vector space over the field $Bbb{F}_3$". This is just the definition.
$endgroup$
– Dietrich Burde
Dec 6 '18 at 17:59




$begingroup$
I meant your statement "I do not understand what is a vector space over the field $Bbb{F}_3$". This is just the definition.
$endgroup$
– Dietrich Burde
Dec 6 '18 at 17:59










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$


If the action is only on he basis elements then how would we find the operations like $σ(e_1+e_2)$?




This seems to be the key to your question.



You are right: at the outset, the action is explicitly only defined on the set ${e_1, e_2, e_3}$. Given a group element $sigma$, and one of these basis elements $b$, we know what $sigmacdot b$ is, and that is all.



But every mapping defined on the basis of a vector space gives rise to a unique linear transformation extending that mapping to the entire vector space spanned by the elements. Furthermore, if the mapping is a bijection and the vector space is finite dimensional, the extension is an isomorphism.



So what is happening is that by definition the action on an arbitrary element of the vector space is defined to be the linear extension: $sigmacdot (sumlambda_ie_i):=sumlambda_i(sigmacdot e_i)$.



You can check all the axioms to confirm that indeed, the originally defined group action on the basis has now been promoted to a group action of $S_3$ on the entire vector space spanned by the basis.



This "lifting" of the group action is what you were missing, I think.





There's another way to see how this happens. You can rephrase a group action of $G$ on a set $X$ to be a homomorphism from $Gto Sym(X)$.



If $X$ is the finite basis of an $n$ dimensional $F$ vector space, we have another group homomorphism from $Sym(X)to GL(n,F)$. Composing these two homomorphisms we get a group homomorphism from $Gto GL(n,F)$, and that defines an action of $G$ on $span(X)$.



It says, essentially, that every element of $G$ acts like a linear automorphism on $span(X)$ (very nice elements of $Sym(span(X))$!)






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$





















    1












    $begingroup$

    A vector space of dimension $3$ with the underlying field $F_3$ is isomorphic to $F_3^3$. A standard basis for this vector space is ${e_1=(1,0,0)^{T},e_2=(0,1,0)^{T},e_3=(0,0,1)^{T}}$. As we know, A linear map $f$ from the vector space to itself can be represented by a matrix of this form begin{bmatrix}
    . & . & . \
    f(e_1) &f(e_2) & f(e_3) \

    . & .&.
    end{bmatrix}



    Since a permutation just permute the basis vectors, The resulting linear maps are exactly the 3by3 permutation matrices. Foe example, the permutation $(1,2) in S_3$ can be represented by the matrix



    begin{bmatrix}
    0 & 1 & 0 \
    1 &0 & 0 \

    0 & 0&1
    end{bmatrix}
    . So you can really think of your group as the set of permutation matrices and a group element acting on the vectors by left multiply the matrix with the vector. For example, $(1,2)$ act on the vector $(1,2,2)^{T}$ gives the vector $(2,1,2)^{T}$.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$





















      0












      $begingroup$

      The elements of $V$ simply consist of triples of elements from $F_3$. So a typical element of $V$ would be $(1,0,2)$ or $(2,1,2)$ etc. Addition of vectors in $V$ follows the rules of addition in $F_3$ so $(1,0,2)+(2,1,2) = (0,1,1)$. Scalar multiplication of vectors follows the rules of multiplication in $F_3$, so $2(1,0,2) = (1,0,2) + (1,0,2) = (2,0,1)$.



      I think there is an unstated assumption that each action $sigma$ will be linear on $V$, so



      $ sigma(e_1 + e_2) = sigma(e_1) + sigma(e_2) = e_{sigma(1)} + e_{sigma(2)} $






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$













      • $begingroup$
        So I think this question math.stackexchange.com/questions/2592909/… is not complete.@gandalf61
        $endgroup$
        – cmi
        Dec 6 '18 at 16:53










      • $begingroup$
        @cmi This is an answer to your question. Why do yo refer to some other question? Furthermore, the linked question seems complete to me. Why not?
        $endgroup$
        – Christoph
        Dec 6 '18 at 17:18












      • $begingroup$
        Is it illegal here to refer other question?@Christoph
        $endgroup$
        – cmi
        Dec 6 '18 at 17:26










      • $begingroup$
        Can you tell me how to define $sigma (c_1 e_1 + c_2 e_2)$?@Christoph
        $endgroup$
        – cmi
        Dec 6 '18 at 17:28










      • $begingroup$
        @cmi as multiple responders have stated, the group action should be linear on the vector space, as it can be represented that way. Therefore it splits as you expect. A Google search shows that Wolfram mathworld confirms this with a general statement about group actions I don't confess to understand, but I believe it is mathnoob's answer here.
        $endgroup$
        – theREALyumdub
        Dec 6 '18 at 17:49





















      -1












      $begingroup$

      $mathbb F_3[x]/(p(x))$ will be just that vector space, if $p(x)inmathbb F_3[x]$ is irreducible and $operatorname{deg}p=3$.



      So for instance, take $p$ that doesn't have a root in $mathbb F_3$. Say, $p(x)=x^3+2x^2+1$.



      To answer your last question, use the property of group actions: $sigma (e_1+e_2)=sigma (e_1)+sigma (e_2)=e_{sigma (1)}+e_{sigma (2)}$, for $e_1,e_2in V$.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$









      • 1




        $begingroup$
        Nothing is comprehensible .. Where did you get $p(x)$? where did you get this property of group action?
        $endgroup$
        – cmi
        Dec 6 '18 at 17:11










      • $begingroup$
        A group action preserves the structure of the vector space. As for $p$, I guess I could have waited on that.
        $endgroup$
        – Chris Custer
        Dec 6 '18 at 17:17










      • $begingroup$
        "Group action preserves the structure of vector space". Can you please share a link or something so that I can read the proof of this statement?@Chris Custer
        $endgroup$
        – cmi
        Dec 6 '18 at 17:27










      • $begingroup$
        en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Group_action
        $endgroup$
        – Chris Custer
        Dec 6 '18 at 17:30










      • $begingroup$
        You have referred me to ocean to find a fish.@Chris Custer
        $endgroup$
        – cmi
        Dec 6 '18 at 17:34











      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      });
      });
      }, "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3028711%2fcan-i-take-the-vector-space-generated-by-1-x-x2-over-the-field-f-3%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      4 Answers
      4






      active

      oldest

      votes








      4 Answers
      4






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      2












      $begingroup$


      If the action is only on he basis elements then how would we find the operations like $σ(e_1+e_2)$?




      This seems to be the key to your question.



      You are right: at the outset, the action is explicitly only defined on the set ${e_1, e_2, e_3}$. Given a group element $sigma$, and one of these basis elements $b$, we know what $sigmacdot b$ is, and that is all.



      But every mapping defined on the basis of a vector space gives rise to a unique linear transformation extending that mapping to the entire vector space spanned by the elements. Furthermore, if the mapping is a bijection and the vector space is finite dimensional, the extension is an isomorphism.



      So what is happening is that by definition the action on an arbitrary element of the vector space is defined to be the linear extension: $sigmacdot (sumlambda_ie_i):=sumlambda_i(sigmacdot e_i)$.



      You can check all the axioms to confirm that indeed, the originally defined group action on the basis has now been promoted to a group action of $S_3$ on the entire vector space spanned by the basis.



      This "lifting" of the group action is what you were missing, I think.





      There's another way to see how this happens. You can rephrase a group action of $G$ on a set $X$ to be a homomorphism from $Gto Sym(X)$.



      If $X$ is the finite basis of an $n$ dimensional $F$ vector space, we have another group homomorphism from $Sym(X)to GL(n,F)$. Composing these two homomorphisms we get a group homomorphism from $Gto GL(n,F)$, and that defines an action of $G$ on $span(X)$.



      It says, essentially, that every element of $G$ acts like a linear automorphism on $span(X)$ (very nice elements of $Sym(span(X))$!)






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$


















        2












        $begingroup$


        If the action is only on he basis elements then how would we find the operations like $σ(e_1+e_2)$?




        This seems to be the key to your question.



        You are right: at the outset, the action is explicitly only defined on the set ${e_1, e_2, e_3}$. Given a group element $sigma$, and one of these basis elements $b$, we know what $sigmacdot b$ is, and that is all.



        But every mapping defined on the basis of a vector space gives rise to a unique linear transformation extending that mapping to the entire vector space spanned by the elements. Furthermore, if the mapping is a bijection and the vector space is finite dimensional, the extension is an isomorphism.



        So what is happening is that by definition the action on an arbitrary element of the vector space is defined to be the linear extension: $sigmacdot (sumlambda_ie_i):=sumlambda_i(sigmacdot e_i)$.



        You can check all the axioms to confirm that indeed, the originally defined group action on the basis has now been promoted to a group action of $S_3$ on the entire vector space spanned by the basis.



        This "lifting" of the group action is what you were missing, I think.





        There's another way to see how this happens. You can rephrase a group action of $G$ on a set $X$ to be a homomorphism from $Gto Sym(X)$.



        If $X$ is the finite basis of an $n$ dimensional $F$ vector space, we have another group homomorphism from $Sym(X)to GL(n,F)$. Composing these two homomorphisms we get a group homomorphism from $Gto GL(n,F)$, and that defines an action of $G$ on $span(X)$.



        It says, essentially, that every element of $G$ acts like a linear automorphism on $span(X)$ (very nice elements of $Sym(span(X))$!)






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$
















          2












          2








          2





          $begingroup$


          If the action is only on he basis elements then how would we find the operations like $σ(e_1+e_2)$?




          This seems to be the key to your question.



          You are right: at the outset, the action is explicitly only defined on the set ${e_1, e_2, e_3}$. Given a group element $sigma$, and one of these basis elements $b$, we know what $sigmacdot b$ is, and that is all.



          But every mapping defined on the basis of a vector space gives rise to a unique linear transformation extending that mapping to the entire vector space spanned by the elements. Furthermore, if the mapping is a bijection and the vector space is finite dimensional, the extension is an isomorphism.



          So what is happening is that by definition the action on an arbitrary element of the vector space is defined to be the linear extension: $sigmacdot (sumlambda_ie_i):=sumlambda_i(sigmacdot e_i)$.



          You can check all the axioms to confirm that indeed, the originally defined group action on the basis has now been promoted to a group action of $S_3$ on the entire vector space spanned by the basis.



          This "lifting" of the group action is what you were missing, I think.





          There's another way to see how this happens. You can rephrase a group action of $G$ on a set $X$ to be a homomorphism from $Gto Sym(X)$.



          If $X$ is the finite basis of an $n$ dimensional $F$ vector space, we have another group homomorphism from $Sym(X)to GL(n,F)$. Composing these two homomorphisms we get a group homomorphism from $Gto GL(n,F)$, and that defines an action of $G$ on $span(X)$.



          It says, essentially, that every element of $G$ acts like a linear automorphism on $span(X)$ (very nice elements of $Sym(span(X))$!)






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$




          If the action is only on he basis elements then how would we find the operations like $σ(e_1+e_2)$?




          This seems to be the key to your question.



          You are right: at the outset, the action is explicitly only defined on the set ${e_1, e_2, e_3}$. Given a group element $sigma$, and one of these basis elements $b$, we know what $sigmacdot b$ is, and that is all.



          But every mapping defined on the basis of a vector space gives rise to a unique linear transformation extending that mapping to the entire vector space spanned by the elements. Furthermore, if the mapping is a bijection and the vector space is finite dimensional, the extension is an isomorphism.



          So what is happening is that by definition the action on an arbitrary element of the vector space is defined to be the linear extension: $sigmacdot (sumlambda_ie_i):=sumlambda_i(sigmacdot e_i)$.



          You can check all the axioms to confirm that indeed, the originally defined group action on the basis has now been promoted to a group action of $S_3$ on the entire vector space spanned by the basis.



          This "lifting" of the group action is what you were missing, I think.





          There's another way to see how this happens. You can rephrase a group action of $G$ on a set $X$ to be a homomorphism from $Gto Sym(X)$.



          If $X$ is the finite basis of an $n$ dimensional $F$ vector space, we have another group homomorphism from $Sym(X)to GL(n,F)$. Composing these two homomorphisms we get a group homomorphism from $Gto GL(n,F)$, and that defines an action of $G$ on $span(X)$.



          It says, essentially, that every element of $G$ acts like a linear automorphism on $span(X)$ (very nice elements of $Sym(span(X))$!)







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Dec 7 '18 at 14:40

























          answered Dec 7 '18 at 14:35









          rschwiebrschwieb

          106k12102249




          106k12102249























              1












              $begingroup$

              A vector space of dimension $3$ with the underlying field $F_3$ is isomorphic to $F_3^3$. A standard basis for this vector space is ${e_1=(1,0,0)^{T},e_2=(0,1,0)^{T},e_3=(0,0,1)^{T}}$. As we know, A linear map $f$ from the vector space to itself can be represented by a matrix of this form begin{bmatrix}
              . & . & . \
              f(e_1) &f(e_2) & f(e_3) \

              . & .&.
              end{bmatrix}



              Since a permutation just permute the basis vectors, The resulting linear maps are exactly the 3by3 permutation matrices. Foe example, the permutation $(1,2) in S_3$ can be represented by the matrix



              begin{bmatrix}
              0 & 1 & 0 \
              1 &0 & 0 \

              0 & 0&1
              end{bmatrix}
              . So you can really think of your group as the set of permutation matrices and a group element acting on the vectors by left multiply the matrix with the vector. For example, $(1,2)$ act on the vector $(1,2,2)^{T}$ gives the vector $(2,1,2)^{T}$.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$


















                1












                $begingroup$

                A vector space of dimension $3$ with the underlying field $F_3$ is isomorphic to $F_3^3$. A standard basis for this vector space is ${e_1=(1,0,0)^{T},e_2=(0,1,0)^{T},e_3=(0,0,1)^{T}}$. As we know, A linear map $f$ from the vector space to itself can be represented by a matrix of this form begin{bmatrix}
                . & . & . \
                f(e_1) &f(e_2) & f(e_3) \

                . & .&.
                end{bmatrix}



                Since a permutation just permute the basis vectors, The resulting linear maps are exactly the 3by3 permutation matrices. Foe example, the permutation $(1,2) in S_3$ can be represented by the matrix



                begin{bmatrix}
                0 & 1 & 0 \
                1 &0 & 0 \

                0 & 0&1
                end{bmatrix}
                . So you can really think of your group as the set of permutation matrices and a group element acting on the vectors by left multiply the matrix with the vector. For example, $(1,2)$ act on the vector $(1,2,2)^{T}$ gives the vector $(2,1,2)^{T}$.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$
















                  1












                  1








                  1





                  $begingroup$

                  A vector space of dimension $3$ with the underlying field $F_3$ is isomorphic to $F_3^3$. A standard basis for this vector space is ${e_1=(1,0,0)^{T},e_2=(0,1,0)^{T},e_3=(0,0,1)^{T}}$. As we know, A linear map $f$ from the vector space to itself can be represented by a matrix of this form begin{bmatrix}
                  . & . & . \
                  f(e_1) &f(e_2) & f(e_3) \

                  . & .&.
                  end{bmatrix}



                  Since a permutation just permute the basis vectors, The resulting linear maps are exactly the 3by3 permutation matrices. Foe example, the permutation $(1,2) in S_3$ can be represented by the matrix



                  begin{bmatrix}
                  0 & 1 & 0 \
                  1 &0 & 0 \

                  0 & 0&1
                  end{bmatrix}
                  . So you can really think of your group as the set of permutation matrices and a group element acting on the vectors by left multiply the matrix with the vector. For example, $(1,2)$ act on the vector $(1,2,2)^{T}$ gives the vector $(2,1,2)^{T}$.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  A vector space of dimension $3$ with the underlying field $F_3$ is isomorphic to $F_3^3$. A standard basis for this vector space is ${e_1=(1,0,0)^{T},e_2=(0,1,0)^{T},e_3=(0,0,1)^{T}}$. As we know, A linear map $f$ from the vector space to itself can be represented by a matrix of this form begin{bmatrix}
                  . & . & . \
                  f(e_1) &f(e_2) & f(e_3) \

                  . & .&.
                  end{bmatrix}



                  Since a permutation just permute the basis vectors, The resulting linear maps are exactly the 3by3 permutation matrices. Foe example, the permutation $(1,2) in S_3$ can be represented by the matrix



                  begin{bmatrix}
                  0 & 1 & 0 \
                  1 &0 & 0 \

                  0 & 0&1
                  end{bmatrix}
                  . So you can really think of your group as the set of permutation matrices and a group element acting on the vectors by left multiply the matrix with the vector. For example, $(1,2)$ act on the vector $(1,2,2)^{T}$ gives the vector $(2,1,2)^{T}$.







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered Dec 6 '18 at 16:50









                  nafhgoodnafhgood

                  1,797422




                  1,797422























                      0












                      $begingroup$

                      The elements of $V$ simply consist of triples of elements from $F_3$. So a typical element of $V$ would be $(1,0,2)$ or $(2,1,2)$ etc. Addition of vectors in $V$ follows the rules of addition in $F_3$ so $(1,0,2)+(2,1,2) = (0,1,1)$. Scalar multiplication of vectors follows the rules of multiplication in $F_3$, so $2(1,0,2) = (1,0,2) + (1,0,2) = (2,0,1)$.



                      I think there is an unstated assumption that each action $sigma$ will be linear on $V$, so



                      $ sigma(e_1 + e_2) = sigma(e_1) + sigma(e_2) = e_{sigma(1)} + e_{sigma(2)} $






                      share|cite|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$













                      • $begingroup$
                        So I think this question math.stackexchange.com/questions/2592909/… is not complete.@gandalf61
                        $endgroup$
                        – cmi
                        Dec 6 '18 at 16:53










                      • $begingroup$
                        @cmi This is an answer to your question. Why do yo refer to some other question? Furthermore, the linked question seems complete to me. Why not?
                        $endgroup$
                        – Christoph
                        Dec 6 '18 at 17:18












                      • $begingroup$
                        Is it illegal here to refer other question?@Christoph
                        $endgroup$
                        – cmi
                        Dec 6 '18 at 17:26










                      • $begingroup$
                        Can you tell me how to define $sigma (c_1 e_1 + c_2 e_2)$?@Christoph
                        $endgroup$
                        – cmi
                        Dec 6 '18 at 17:28










                      • $begingroup$
                        @cmi as multiple responders have stated, the group action should be linear on the vector space, as it can be represented that way. Therefore it splits as you expect. A Google search shows that Wolfram mathworld confirms this with a general statement about group actions I don't confess to understand, but I believe it is mathnoob's answer here.
                        $endgroup$
                        – theREALyumdub
                        Dec 6 '18 at 17:49


















                      0












                      $begingroup$

                      The elements of $V$ simply consist of triples of elements from $F_3$. So a typical element of $V$ would be $(1,0,2)$ or $(2,1,2)$ etc. Addition of vectors in $V$ follows the rules of addition in $F_3$ so $(1,0,2)+(2,1,2) = (0,1,1)$. Scalar multiplication of vectors follows the rules of multiplication in $F_3$, so $2(1,0,2) = (1,0,2) + (1,0,2) = (2,0,1)$.



                      I think there is an unstated assumption that each action $sigma$ will be linear on $V$, so



                      $ sigma(e_1 + e_2) = sigma(e_1) + sigma(e_2) = e_{sigma(1)} + e_{sigma(2)} $






                      share|cite|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$













                      • $begingroup$
                        So I think this question math.stackexchange.com/questions/2592909/… is not complete.@gandalf61
                        $endgroup$
                        – cmi
                        Dec 6 '18 at 16:53










                      • $begingroup$
                        @cmi This is an answer to your question. Why do yo refer to some other question? Furthermore, the linked question seems complete to me. Why not?
                        $endgroup$
                        – Christoph
                        Dec 6 '18 at 17:18












                      • $begingroup$
                        Is it illegal here to refer other question?@Christoph
                        $endgroup$
                        – cmi
                        Dec 6 '18 at 17:26










                      • $begingroup$
                        Can you tell me how to define $sigma (c_1 e_1 + c_2 e_2)$?@Christoph
                        $endgroup$
                        – cmi
                        Dec 6 '18 at 17:28










                      • $begingroup$
                        @cmi as multiple responders have stated, the group action should be linear on the vector space, as it can be represented that way. Therefore it splits as you expect. A Google search shows that Wolfram mathworld confirms this with a general statement about group actions I don't confess to understand, but I believe it is mathnoob's answer here.
                        $endgroup$
                        – theREALyumdub
                        Dec 6 '18 at 17:49
















                      0












                      0








                      0





                      $begingroup$

                      The elements of $V$ simply consist of triples of elements from $F_3$. So a typical element of $V$ would be $(1,0,2)$ or $(2,1,2)$ etc. Addition of vectors in $V$ follows the rules of addition in $F_3$ so $(1,0,2)+(2,1,2) = (0,1,1)$. Scalar multiplication of vectors follows the rules of multiplication in $F_3$, so $2(1,0,2) = (1,0,2) + (1,0,2) = (2,0,1)$.



                      I think there is an unstated assumption that each action $sigma$ will be linear on $V$, so



                      $ sigma(e_1 + e_2) = sigma(e_1) + sigma(e_2) = e_{sigma(1)} + e_{sigma(2)} $






                      share|cite|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$



                      The elements of $V$ simply consist of triples of elements from $F_3$. So a typical element of $V$ would be $(1,0,2)$ or $(2,1,2)$ etc. Addition of vectors in $V$ follows the rules of addition in $F_3$ so $(1,0,2)+(2,1,2) = (0,1,1)$. Scalar multiplication of vectors follows the rules of multiplication in $F_3$, so $2(1,0,2) = (1,0,2) + (1,0,2) = (2,0,1)$.



                      I think there is an unstated assumption that each action $sigma$ will be linear on $V$, so



                      $ sigma(e_1 + e_2) = sigma(e_1) + sigma(e_2) = e_{sigma(1)} + e_{sigma(2)} $







                      share|cite|improve this answer












                      share|cite|improve this answer



                      share|cite|improve this answer










                      answered Dec 6 '18 at 16:42









                      gandalf61gandalf61

                      8,329625




                      8,329625












                      • $begingroup$
                        So I think this question math.stackexchange.com/questions/2592909/… is not complete.@gandalf61
                        $endgroup$
                        – cmi
                        Dec 6 '18 at 16:53










                      • $begingroup$
                        @cmi This is an answer to your question. Why do yo refer to some other question? Furthermore, the linked question seems complete to me. Why not?
                        $endgroup$
                        – Christoph
                        Dec 6 '18 at 17:18












                      • $begingroup$
                        Is it illegal here to refer other question?@Christoph
                        $endgroup$
                        – cmi
                        Dec 6 '18 at 17:26










                      • $begingroup$
                        Can you tell me how to define $sigma (c_1 e_1 + c_2 e_2)$?@Christoph
                        $endgroup$
                        – cmi
                        Dec 6 '18 at 17:28










                      • $begingroup$
                        @cmi as multiple responders have stated, the group action should be linear on the vector space, as it can be represented that way. Therefore it splits as you expect. A Google search shows that Wolfram mathworld confirms this with a general statement about group actions I don't confess to understand, but I believe it is mathnoob's answer here.
                        $endgroup$
                        – theREALyumdub
                        Dec 6 '18 at 17:49




















                      • $begingroup$
                        So I think this question math.stackexchange.com/questions/2592909/… is not complete.@gandalf61
                        $endgroup$
                        – cmi
                        Dec 6 '18 at 16:53










                      • $begingroup$
                        @cmi This is an answer to your question. Why do yo refer to some other question? Furthermore, the linked question seems complete to me. Why not?
                        $endgroup$
                        – Christoph
                        Dec 6 '18 at 17:18












                      • $begingroup$
                        Is it illegal here to refer other question?@Christoph
                        $endgroup$
                        – cmi
                        Dec 6 '18 at 17:26










                      • $begingroup$
                        Can you tell me how to define $sigma (c_1 e_1 + c_2 e_2)$?@Christoph
                        $endgroup$
                        – cmi
                        Dec 6 '18 at 17:28










                      • $begingroup$
                        @cmi as multiple responders have stated, the group action should be linear on the vector space, as it can be represented that way. Therefore it splits as you expect. A Google search shows that Wolfram mathworld confirms this with a general statement about group actions I don't confess to understand, but I believe it is mathnoob's answer here.
                        $endgroup$
                        – theREALyumdub
                        Dec 6 '18 at 17:49


















                      $begingroup$
                      So I think this question math.stackexchange.com/questions/2592909/… is not complete.@gandalf61
                      $endgroup$
                      – cmi
                      Dec 6 '18 at 16:53




                      $begingroup$
                      So I think this question math.stackexchange.com/questions/2592909/… is not complete.@gandalf61
                      $endgroup$
                      – cmi
                      Dec 6 '18 at 16:53












                      $begingroup$
                      @cmi This is an answer to your question. Why do yo refer to some other question? Furthermore, the linked question seems complete to me. Why not?
                      $endgroup$
                      – Christoph
                      Dec 6 '18 at 17:18






                      $begingroup$
                      @cmi This is an answer to your question. Why do yo refer to some other question? Furthermore, the linked question seems complete to me. Why not?
                      $endgroup$
                      – Christoph
                      Dec 6 '18 at 17:18














                      $begingroup$
                      Is it illegal here to refer other question?@Christoph
                      $endgroup$
                      – cmi
                      Dec 6 '18 at 17:26




                      $begingroup$
                      Is it illegal here to refer other question?@Christoph
                      $endgroup$
                      – cmi
                      Dec 6 '18 at 17:26












                      $begingroup$
                      Can you tell me how to define $sigma (c_1 e_1 + c_2 e_2)$?@Christoph
                      $endgroup$
                      – cmi
                      Dec 6 '18 at 17:28




                      $begingroup$
                      Can you tell me how to define $sigma (c_1 e_1 + c_2 e_2)$?@Christoph
                      $endgroup$
                      – cmi
                      Dec 6 '18 at 17:28












                      $begingroup$
                      @cmi as multiple responders have stated, the group action should be linear on the vector space, as it can be represented that way. Therefore it splits as you expect. A Google search shows that Wolfram mathworld confirms this with a general statement about group actions I don't confess to understand, but I believe it is mathnoob's answer here.
                      $endgroup$
                      – theREALyumdub
                      Dec 6 '18 at 17:49






                      $begingroup$
                      @cmi as multiple responders have stated, the group action should be linear on the vector space, as it can be represented that way. Therefore it splits as you expect. A Google search shows that Wolfram mathworld confirms this with a general statement about group actions I don't confess to understand, but I believe it is mathnoob's answer here.
                      $endgroup$
                      – theREALyumdub
                      Dec 6 '18 at 17:49













                      -1












                      $begingroup$

                      $mathbb F_3[x]/(p(x))$ will be just that vector space, if $p(x)inmathbb F_3[x]$ is irreducible and $operatorname{deg}p=3$.



                      So for instance, take $p$ that doesn't have a root in $mathbb F_3$. Say, $p(x)=x^3+2x^2+1$.



                      To answer your last question, use the property of group actions: $sigma (e_1+e_2)=sigma (e_1)+sigma (e_2)=e_{sigma (1)}+e_{sigma (2)}$, for $e_1,e_2in V$.






                      share|cite|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$









                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        Nothing is comprehensible .. Where did you get $p(x)$? where did you get this property of group action?
                        $endgroup$
                        – cmi
                        Dec 6 '18 at 17:11










                      • $begingroup$
                        A group action preserves the structure of the vector space. As for $p$, I guess I could have waited on that.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Chris Custer
                        Dec 6 '18 at 17:17










                      • $begingroup$
                        "Group action preserves the structure of vector space". Can you please share a link or something so that I can read the proof of this statement?@Chris Custer
                        $endgroup$
                        – cmi
                        Dec 6 '18 at 17:27










                      • $begingroup$
                        en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Group_action
                        $endgroup$
                        – Chris Custer
                        Dec 6 '18 at 17:30










                      • $begingroup$
                        You have referred me to ocean to find a fish.@Chris Custer
                        $endgroup$
                        – cmi
                        Dec 6 '18 at 17:34
















                      -1












                      $begingroup$

                      $mathbb F_3[x]/(p(x))$ will be just that vector space, if $p(x)inmathbb F_3[x]$ is irreducible and $operatorname{deg}p=3$.



                      So for instance, take $p$ that doesn't have a root in $mathbb F_3$. Say, $p(x)=x^3+2x^2+1$.



                      To answer your last question, use the property of group actions: $sigma (e_1+e_2)=sigma (e_1)+sigma (e_2)=e_{sigma (1)}+e_{sigma (2)}$, for $e_1,e_2in V$.






                      share|cite|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$









                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        Nothing is comprehensible .. Where did you get $p(x)$? where did you get this property of group action?
                        $endgroup$
                        – cmi
                        Dec 6 '18 at 17:11










                      • $begingroup$
                        A group action preserves the structure of the vector space. As for $p$, I guess I could have waited on that.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Chris Custer
                        Dec 6 '18 at 17:17










                      • $begingroup$
                        "Group action preserves the structure of vector space". Can you please share a link or something so that I can read the proof of this statement?@Chris Custer
                        $endgroup$
                        – cmi
                        Dec 6 '18 at 17:27










                      • $begingroup$
                        en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Group_action
                        $endgroup$
                        – Chris Custer
                        Dec 6 '18 at 17:30










                      • $begingroup$
                        You have referred me to ocean to find a fish.@Chris Custer
                        $endgroup$
                        – cmi
                        Dec 6 '18 at 17:34














                      -1












                      -1








                      -1





                      $begingroup$

                      $mathbb F_3[x]/(p(x))$ will be just that vector space, if $p(x)inmathbb F_3[x]$ is irreducible and $operatorname{deg}p=3$.



                      So for instance, take $p$ that doesn't have a root in $mathbb F_3$. Say, $p(x)=x^3+2x^2+1$.



                      To answer your last question, use the property of group actions: $sigma (e_1+e_2)=sigma (e_1)+sigma (e_2)=e_{sigma (1)}+e_{sigma (2)}$, for $e_1,e_2in V$.






                      share|cite|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$



                      $mathbb F_3[x]/(p(x))$ will be just that vector space, if $p(x)inmathbb F_3[x]$ is irreducible and $operatorname{deg}p=3$.



                      So for instance, take $p$ that doesn't have a root in $mathbb F_3$. Say, $p(x)=x^3+2x^2+1$.



                      To answer your last question, use the property of group actions: $sigma (e_1+e_2)=sigma (e_1)+sigma (e_2)=e_{sigma (1)}+e_{sigma (2)}$, for $e_1,e_2in V$.







                      share|cite|improve this answer












                      share|cite|improve this answer



                      share|cite|improve this answer










                      answered Dec 6 '18 at 17:07









                      Chris CusterChris Custer

                      11.6k3824




                      11.6k3824








                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        Nothing is comprehensible .. Where did you get $p(x)$? where did you get this property of group action?
                        $endgroup$
                        – cmi
                        Dec 6 '18 at 17:11










                      • $begingroup$
                        A group action preserves the structure of the vector space. As for $p$, I guess I could have waited on that.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Chris Custer
                        Dec 6 '18 at 17:17










                      • $begingroup$
                        "Group action preserves the structure of vector space". Can you please share a link or something so that I can read the proof of this statement?@Chris Custer
                        $endgroup$
                        – cmi
                        Dec 6 '18 at 17:27










                      • $begingroup$
                        en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Group_action
                        $endgroup$
                        – Chris Custer
                        Dec 6 '18 at 17:30










                      • $begingroup$
                        You have referred me to ocean to find a fish.@Chris Custer
                        $endgroup$
                        – cmi
                        Dec 6 '18 at 17:34














                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        Nothing is comprehensible .. Where did you get $p(x)$? where did you get this property of group action?
                        $endgroup$
                        – cmi
                        Dec 6 '18 at 17:11










                      • $begingroup$
                        A group action preserves the structure of the vector space. As for $p$, I guess I could have waited on that.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Chris Custer
                        Dec 6 '18 at 17:17










                      • $begingroup$
                        "Group action preserves the structure of vector space". Can you please share a link or something so that I can read the proof of this statement?@Chris Custer
                        $endgroup$
                        – cmi
                        Dec 6 '18 at 17:27










                      • $begingroup$
                        en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Group_action
                        $endgroup$
                        – Chris Custer
                        Dec 6 '18 at 17:30










                      • $begingroup$
                        You have referred me to ocean to find a fish.@Chris Custer
                        $endgroup$
                        – cmi
                        Dec 6 '18 at 17:34








                      1




                      1




                      $begingroup$
                      Nothing is comprehensible .. Where did you get $p(x)$? where did you get this property of group action?
                      $endgroup$
                      – cmi
                      Dec 6 '18 at 17:11




                      $begingroup$
                      Nothing is comprehensible .. Where did you get $p(x)$? where did you get this property of group action?
                      $endgroup$
                      – cmi
                      Dec 6 '18 at 17:11












                      $begingroup$
                      A group action preserves the structure of the vector space. As for $p$, I guess I could have waited on that.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Chris Custer
                      Dec 6 '18 at 17:17




                      $begingroup$
                      A group action preserves the structure of the vector space. As for $p$, I guess I could have waited on that.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Chris Custer
                      Dec 6 '18 at 17:17












                      $begingroup$
                      "Group action preserves the structure of vector space". Can you please share a link or something so that I can read the proof of this statement?@Chris Custer
                      $endgroup$
                      – cmi
                      Dec 6 '18 at 17:27




                      $begingroup$
                      "Group action preserves the structure of vector space". Can you please share a link or something so that I can read the proof of this statement?@Chris Custer
                      $endgroup$
                      – cmi
                      Dec 6 '18 at 17:27












                      $begingroup$
                      en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Group_action
                      $endgroup$
                      – Chris Custer
                      Dec 6 '18 at 17:30




                      $begingroup$
                      en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Group_action
                      $endgroup$
                      – Chris Custer
                      Dec 6 '18 at 17:30












                      $begingroup$
                      You have referred me to ocean to find a fish.@Chris Custer
                      $endgroup$
                      – cmi
                      Dec 6 '18 at 17:34




                      $begingroup$
                      You have referred me to ocean to find a fish.@Chris Custer
                      $endgroup$
                      – cmi
                      Dec 6 '18 at 17:34


















                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3028711%2fcan-i-take-the-vector-space-generated-by-1-x-x2-over-the-field-f-3%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Quarter-circle Tiles

                      build a pushdown automaton that recognizes the reverse language of a given pushdown automaton?

                      Mont Emei