Metrics on families of functions












3












$begingroup$


Let $mathcal{F}$ be a family of functions $Dsubseteq mathbb{R}^nrightarrow mathbb{R}$. Depending on the characteristics of these functions there are a number of metrics that we would naturally associate with $mathcal{F}$, namely $C^p$ metrics, $L^p$ metrics and metrics that involve Lipschitz constants.




I'd like to hear about other metrics --possibly less well known than the ones mentioned-- that we associate naturally* with families of functions with certain properties.




*By naturally I mean that the definition of the metric has something to do with the functions themselves, so not just metrics that you may consider say on any set of a given cardinality.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The Sobolev metrics certainly form an important class of examples.
    $endgroup$
    – pseudocydonia
    Oct 29 '18 at 3:17
















3












$begingroup$


Let $mathcal{F}$ be a family of functions $Dsubseteq mathbb{R}^nrightarrow mathbb{R}$. Depending on the characteristics of these functions there are a number of metrics that we would naturally associate with $mathcal{F}$, namely $C^p$ metrics, $L^p$ metrics and metrics that involve Lipschitz constants.




I'd like to hear about other metrics --possibly less well known than the ones mentioned-- that we associate naturally* with families of functions with certain properties.




*By naturally I mean that the definition of the metric has something to do with the functions themselves, so not just metrics that you may consider say on any set of a given cardinality.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The Sobolev metrics certainly form an important class of examples.
    $endgroup$
    – pseudocydonia
    Oct 29 '18 at 3:17














3












3








3





$begingroup$


Let $mathcal{F}$ be a family of functions $Dsubseteq mathbb{R}^nrightarrow mathbb{R}$. Depending on the characteristics of these functions there are a number of metrics that we would naturally associate with $mathcal{F}$, namely $C^p$ metrics, $L^p$ metrics and metrics that involve Lipschitz constants.




I'd like to hear about other metrics --possibly less well known than the ones mentioned-- that we associate naturally* with families of functions with certain properties.




*By naturally I mean that the definition of the metric has something to do with the functions themselves, so not just metrics that you may consider say on any set of a given cardinality.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Let $mathcal{F}$ be a family of functions $Dsubseteq mathbb{R}^nrightarrow mathbb{R}$. Depending on the characteristics of these functions there are a number of metrics that we would naturally associate with $mathcal{F}$, namely $C^p$ metrics, $L^p$ metrics and metrics that involve Lipschitz constants.




I'd like to hear about other metrics --possibly less well known than the ones mentioned-- that we associate naturally* with families of functions with certain properties.




*By naturally I mean that the definition of the metric has something to do with the functions themselves, so not just metrics that you may consider say on any set of a given cardinality.







general-topology functional-analysis metric-spaces big-list






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 6 '18 at 15:18







Anguepa

















asked Oct 16 '18 at 15:16









AnguepaAnguepa

1,406819




1,406819








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The Sobolev metrics certainly form an important class of examples.
    $endgroup$
    – pseudocydonia
    Oct 29 '18 at 3:17














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The Sobolev metrics certainly form an important class of examples.
    $endgroup$
    – pseudocydonia
    Oct 29 '18 at 3:17








1




1




$begingroup$
The Sobolev metrics certainly form an important class of examples.
$endgroup$
– pseudocydonia
Oct 29 '18 at 3:17




$begingroup$
The Sobolev metrics certainly form an important class of examples.
$endgroup$
– pseudocydonia
Oct 29 '18 at 3:17










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

There are a number of interesting metrics on (metric) measure spaces, the simplest of which might be the discrepancy metric. Let $(Omega, rho)$ be a metric space and let $mu$ and $nu$ be two probability measures defined on $Omega$. Let ${cal B}$ be the set of all closed balls in $Omega$. Then the discrepancy metric is defined as



$$d_D(mu, nu) := sup_{B in {cal B}} |mu(B) -nu(B)|$$



Since $mu$ and $nu$ are probability measures we see immediately that $0leq d_D leq 1$, and (more importantly) that it is scale-invariant -- multiplying $rho$ by any positive constant does not affect $d_D$. It's commonly used to study random walks on groups.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2958030%2fmetrics-on-families-of-functions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1












    $begingroup$

    There are a number of interesting metrics on (metric) measure spaces, the simplest of which might be the discrepancy metric. Let $(Omega, rho)$ be a metric space and let $mu$ and $nu$ be two probability measures defined on $Omega$. Let ${cal B}$ be the set of all closed balls in $Omega$. Then the discrepancy metric is defined as



    $$d_D(mu, nu) := sup_{B in {cal B}} |mu(B) -nu(B)|$$



    Since $mu$ and $nu$ are probability measures we see immediately that $0leq d_D leq 1$, and (more importantly) that it is scale-invariant -- multiplying $rho$ by any positive constant does not affect $d_D$. It's commonly used to study random walks on groups.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      1












      $begingroup$

      There are a number of interesting metrics on (metric) measure spaces, the simplest of which might be the discrepancy metric. Let $(Omega, rho)$ be a metric space and let $mu$ and $nu$ be two probability measures defined on $Omega$. Let ${cal B}$ be the set of all closed balls in $Omega$. Then the discrepancy metric is defined as



      $$d_D(mu, nu) := sup_{B in {cal B}} |mu(B) -nu(B)|$$



      Since $mu$ and $nu$ are probability measures we see immediately that $0leq d_D leq 1$, and (more importantly) that it is scale-invariant -- multiplying $rho$ by any positive constant does not affect $d_D$. It's commonly used to study random walks on groups.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        1












        1








        1





        $begingroup$

        There are a number of interesting metrics on (metric) measure spaces, the simplest of which might be the discrepancy metric. Let $(Omega, rho)$ be a metric space and let $mu$ and $nu$ be two probability measures defined on $Omega$. Let ${cal B}$ be the set of all closed balls in $Omega$. Then the discrepancy metric is defined as



        $$d_D(mu, nu) := sup_{B in {cal B}} |mu(B) -nu(B)|$$



        Since $mu$ and $nu$ are probability measures we see immediately that $0leq d_D leq 1$, and (more importantly) that it is scale-invariant -- multiplying $rho$ by any positive constant does not affect $d_D$. It's commonly used to study random walks on groups.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        There are a number of interesting metrics on (metric) measure spaces, the simplest of which might be the discrepancy metric. Let $(Omega, rho)$ be a metric space and let $mu$ and $nu$ be two probability measures defined on $Omega$. Let ${cal B}$ be the set of all closed balls in $Omega$. Then the discrepancy metric is defined as



        $$d_D(mu, nu) := sup_{B in {cal B}} |mu(B) -nu(B)|$$



        Since $mu$ and $nu$ are probability measures we see immediately that $0leq d_D leq 1$, and (more importantly) that it is scale-invariant -- multiplying $rho$ by any positive constant does not affect $d_D$. It's commonly used to study random walks on groups.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Dec 6 '18 at 20:48









        postmortespostmortes

        1,89321117




        1,89321117






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2958030%2fmetrics-on-families-of-functions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Ellipse (mathématiques)

            Quarter-circle Tiles

            Mont Emei