Conditions for integrations by parts












0












$begingroup$


Let's say I have two periodic continuous functions $f(x)$,$g(x)$ with period $2pi $, which are also piecewise differentiable on the real line.



Does the following formula for integration by parts take hold? $$intlimits_{ - pi }^pi {f'(x)g(x)dx} = left. {f(x)g(x)} right|_{ - pi }^pi - intlimits_{ - pi }^pi {f(x)g'(x)dx} $$



I believe it does.



Here's my attempt of a proof:



Let's say ${x_1},...,{x_n} in left( { - pi ,pi } right)$ are the points in which either $f(x)$ or $g(x)$ is not differentiable (but the one sided derivatives exist). We define ${x_0} = - pi $ and ${x_{n + 1}} = pi $.



Then we can say (from the linearity of the integral) that $$intlimits_{ - pi }^pi {f'(x)g(x)dx} = sumlimits_{k = 1}^{n + 1} {intlimits_{{x_{k - 1}}}^{{x_k}} {f'(x)g(x)dx} } $$
and because $f(x)$ and $g(x)$ are continuously differentiable on each segment $left( {{x_{k - 1}},{x_k}} right)$ and are continuous on $left[ { - pi ,pi } right]$ we can use the regular integration by parts formula:
$$eqalign{
& intlimits_{ - pi }^pi {f'(x)g(x)dx} = sumlimits_{k = 1}^{n + 1} {intlimits_{{x_{k - 1}}}^{{x_k}} {f'(x)g(x)dx} } cr
& {rm{ }} = sumlimits_{k = 1}^{n + 1} {left[ {fleft( {{x_k}} right)gleft( {{x_k}} right) - fleft( {{x_{k - 1}}} right)gleft( {{x_{k - 1}}} right) - intlimits_{{x_{k - 1}}}^{{x_k}} {f(x)g'(x)dx} } right]} cr} $$



There are a lot of terms which cancel out and we are left with
$$left. {f(x)g(x)} right|_{ - pi }^pi - intlimits_{ - pi }^pi {f(x)g'(x)dx} $$



QED.



Is my proof correct?



Thank you a lot in advance!










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$


    Let's say I have two periodic continuous functions $f(x)$,$g(x)$ with period $2pi $, which are also piecewise differentiable on the real line.



    Does the following formula for integration by parts take hold? $$intlimits_{ - pi }^pi {f'(x)g(x)dx} = left. {f(x)g(x)} right|_{ - pi }^pi - intlimits_{ - pi }^pi {f(x)g'(x)dx} $$



    I believe it does.



    Here's my attempt of a proof:



    Let's say ${x_1},...,{x_n} in left( { - pi ,pi } right)$ are the points in which either $f(x)$ or $g(x)$ is not differentiable (but the one sided derivatives exist). We define ${x_0} = - pi $ and ${x_{n + 1}} = pi $.



    Then we can say (from the linearity of the integral) that $$intlimits_{ - pi }^pi {f'(x)g(x)dx} = sumlimits_{k = 1}^{n + 1} {intlimits_{{x_{k - 1}}}^{{x_k}} {f'(x)g(x)dx} } $$
    and because $f(x)$ and $g(x)$ are continuously differentiable on each segment $left( {{x_{k - 1}},{x_k}} right)$ and are continuous on $left[ { - pi ,pi } right]$ we can use the regular integration by parts formula:
    $$eqalign{
    & intlimits_{ - pi }^pi {f'(x)g(x)dx} = sumlimits_{k = 1}^{n + 1} {intlimits_{{x_{k - 1}}}^{{x_k}} {f'(x)g(x)dx} } cr
    & {rm{ }} = sumlimits_{k = 1}^{n + 1} {left[ {fleft( {{x_k}} right)gleft( {{x_k}} right) - fleft( {{x_{k - 1}}} right)gleft( {{x_{k - 1}}} right) - intlimits_{{x_{k - 1}}}^{{x_k}} {f(x)g'(x)dx} } right]} cr} $$



    There are a lot of terms which cancel out and we are left with
    $$left. {f(x)g(x)} right|_{ - pi }^pi - intlimits_{ - pi }^pi {f(x)g'(x)dx} $$



    QED.



    Is my proof correct?



    Thank you a lot in advance!










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      Let's say I have two periodic continuous functions $f(x)$,$g(x)$ with period $2pi $, which are also piecewise differentiable on the real line.



      Does the following formula for integration by parts take hold? $$intlimits_{ - pi }^pi {f'(x)g(x)dx} = left. {f(x)g(x)} right|_{ - pi }^pi - intlimits_{ - pi }^pi {f(x)g'(x)dx} $$



      I believe it does.



      Here's my attempt of a proof:



      Let's say ${x_1},...,{x_n} in left( { - pi ,pi } right)$ are the points in which either $f(x)$ or $g(x)$ is not differentiable (but the one sided derivatives exist). We define ${x_0} = - pi $ and ${x_{n + 1}} = pi $.



      Then we can say (from the linearity of the integral) that $$intlimits_{ - pi }^pi {f'(x)g(x)dx} = sumlimits_{k = 1}^{n + 1} {intlimits_{{x_{k - 1}}}^{{x_k}} {f'(x)g(x)dx} } $$
      and because $f(x)$ and $g(x)$ are continuously differentiable on each segment $left( {{x_{k - 1}},{x_k}} right)$ and are continuous on $left[ { - pi ,pi } right]$ we can use the regular integration by parts formula:
      $$eqalign{
      & intlimits_{ - pi }^pi {f'(x)g(x)dx} = sumlimits_{k = 1}^{n + 1} {intlimits_{{x_{k - 1}}}^{{x_k}} {f'(x)g(x)dx} } cr
      & {rm{ }} = sumlimits_{k = 1}^{n + 1} {left[ {fleft( {{x_k}} right)gleft( {{x_k}} right) - fleft( {{x_{k - 1}}} right)gleft( {{x_{k - 1}}} right) - intlimits_{{x_{k - 1}}}^{{x_k}} {f(x)g'(x)dx} } right]} cr} $$



      There are a lot of terms which cancel out and we are left with
      $$left. {f(x)g(x)} right|_{ - pi }^pi - intlimits_{ - pi }^pi {f(x)g'(x)dx} $$



      QED.



      Is my proof correct?



      Thank you a lot in advance!










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      Let's say I have two periodic continuous functions $f(x)$,$g(x)$ with period $2pi $, which are also piecewise differentiable on the real line.



      Does the following formula for integration by parts take hold? $$intlimits_{ - pi }^pi {f'(x)g(x)dx} = left. {f(x)g(x)} right|_{ - pi }^pi - intlimits_{ - pi }^pi {f(x)g'(x)dx} $$



      I believe it does.



      Here's my attempt of a proof:



      Let's say ${x_1},...,{x_n} in left( { - pi ,pi } right)$ are the points in which either $f(x)$ or $g(x)$ is not differentiable (but the one sided derivatives exist). We define ${x_0} = - pi $ and ${x_{n + 1}} = pi $.



      Then we can say (from the linearity of the integral) that $$intlimits_{ - pi }^pi {f'(x)g(x)dx} = sumlimits_{k = 1}^{n + 1} {intlimits_{{x_{k - 1}}}^{{x_k}} {f'(x)g(x)dx} } $$
      and because $f(x)$ and $g(x)$ are continuously differentiable on each segment $left( {{x_{k - 1}},{x_k}} right)$ and are continuous on $left[ { - pi ,pi } right]$ we can use the regular integration by parts formula:
      $$eqalign{
      & intlimits_{ - pi }^pi {f'(x)g(x)dx} = sumlimits_{k = 1}^{n + 1} {intlimits_{{x_{k - 1}}}^{{x_k}} {f'(x)g(x)dx} } cr
      & {rm{ }} = sumlimits_{k = 1}^{n + 1} {left[ {fleft( {{x_k}} right)gleft( {{x_k}} right) - fleft( {{x_{k - 1}}} right)gleft( {{x_{k - 1}}} right) - intlimits_{{x_{k - 1}}}^{{x_k}} {f(x)g'(x)dx} } right]} cr} $$



      There are a lot of terms which cancel out and we are left with
      $$left. {f(x)g(x)} right|_{ - pi }^pi - intlimits_{ - pi }^pi {f(x)g'(x)dx} $$



      QED.



      Is my proof correct?



      Thank you a lot in advance!







      calculus proof-verification






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Dec 5 '18 at 14:57









      zokomokozokomoko

      162214




      162214






















          0






          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3027160%2fconditions-for-integrations-by-parts%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          0






          active

          oldest

          votes








          0






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes
















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3027160%2fconditions-for-integrations-by-parts%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Quarter-circle Tiles

          build a pushdown automaton that recognizes the reverse language of a given pushdown automaton?

          Mont Emei