On the notion of tensor in Riemannian Geometry












1












$begingroup$


In DoCarmo’s Riemannian Geometry, a tensor of order $r$ on a Riemannian manifold is defined as a multilinear mapping $$T:Xi^r(M)rightarrow C^{infty}(M)$$
where $M$ is a smooth manifold of dimension $n$, $Xi(M)$ denotes the module of smooth vector fields on $C^{infty}(M)$.



DoCarmo wants to show that $T$ is a pointwise object in the following sense: “Fix a point $pin M$ and let $U$ be a neighborhood of $p$ in $M$ on which it is possible to define vector fields $E_1,...,E_nin Xi(M)$, in such a fashion that at each $qin U$, the vectors ${E_i(q)}$,$i=1,...,n$, form a basis of $T_qM$. ...”



Does the author mean that for each neighborhood of $p$ there exists such vector fields, or what? If so, how can one define such vector fields?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    This is the natural follow-up to your previous question. In that case, the Riemann curvature tensor field is the map that describes what happens to a vector if you parallel transport around a loop. That map needs have three inputs: the vector, the shooting direction, the receiving direction. You have a map at each point of the manifold.
    $endgroup$
    – Giuseppe Negro
    Dec 5 '18 at 15:13










  • $begingroup$
    Yes my previous question arose from this question which at first made me think we could define a parallel vector field on any open set. In terms of semantics, DoCarmo’s wording in the translated version of his book is wrong.
    $endgroup$
    – User12239
    Dec 5 '18 at 15:23
















1












$begingroup$


In DoCarmo’s Riemannian Geometry, a tensor of order $r$ on a Riemannian manifold is defined as a multilinear mapping $$T:Xi^r(M)rightarrow C^{infty}(M)$$
where $M$ is a smooth manifold of dimension $n$, $Xi(M)$ denotes the module of smooth vector fields on $C^{infty}(M)$.



DoCarmo wants to show that $T$ is a pointwise object in the following sense: “Fix a point $pin M$ and let $U$ be a neighborhood of $p$ in $M$ on which it is possible to define vector fields $E_1,...,E_nin Xi(M)$, in such a fashion that at each $qin U$, the vectors ${E_i(q)}$,$i=1,...,n$, form a basis of $T_qM$. ...”



Does the author mean that for each neighborhood of $p$ there exists such vector fields, or what? If so, how can one define such vector fields?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    This is the natural follow-up to your previous question. In that case, the Riemann curvature tensor field is the map that describes what happens to a vector if you parallel transport around a loop. That map needs have three inputs: the vector, the shooting direction, the receiving direction. You have a map at each point of the manifold.
    $endgroup$
    – Giuseppe Negro
    Dec 5 '18 at 15:13










  • $begingroup$
    Yes my previous question arose from this question which at first made me think we could define a parallel vector field on any open set. In terms of semantics, DoCarmo’s wording in the translated version of his book is wrong.
    $endgroup$
    – User12239
    Dec 5 '18 at 15:23














1












1








1





$begingroup$


In DoCarmo’s Riemannian Geometry, a tensor of order $r$ on a Riemannian manifold is defined as a multilinear mapping $$T:Xi^r(M)rightarrow C^{infty}(M)$$
where $M$ is a smooth manifold of dimension $n$, $Xi(M)$ denotes the module of smooth vector fields on $C^{infty}(M)$.



DoCarmo wants to show that $T$ is a pointwise object in the following sense: “Fix a point $pin M$ and let $U$ be a neighborhood of $p$ in $M$ on which it is possible to define vector fields $E_1,...,E_nin Xi(M)$, in such a fashion that at each $qin U$, the vectors ${E_i(q)}$,$i=1,...,n$, form a basis of $T_qM$. ...”



Does the author mean that for each neighborhood of $p$ there exists such vector fields, or what? If so, how can one define such vector fields?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




In DoCarmo’s Riemannian Geometry, a tensor of order $r$ on a Riemannian manifold is defined as a multilinear mapping $$T:Xi^r(M)rightarrow C^{infty}(M)$$
where $M$ is a smooth manifold of dimension $n$, $Xi(M)$ denotes the module of smooth vector fields on $C^{infty}(M)$.



DoCarmo wants to show that $T$ is a pointwise object in the following sense: “Fix a point $pin M$ and let $U$ be a neighborhood of $p$ in $M$ on which it is possible to define vector fields $E_1,...,E_nin Xi(M)$, in such a fashion that at each $qin U$, the vectors ${E_i(q)}$,$i=1,...,n$, form a basis of $T_qM$. ...”



Does the author mean that for each neighborhood of $p$ there exists such vector fields, or what? If so, how can one define such vector fields?







riemannian-geometry smooth-manifolds vector-fields






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 5 '18 at 17:54







User12239

















asked Dec 5 '18 at 15:09









User12239User12239

441216




441216












  • $begingroup$
    This is the natural follow-up to your previous question. In that case, the Riemann curvature tensor field is the map that describes what happens to a vector if you parallel transport around a loop. That map needs have three inputs: the vector, the shooting direction, the receiving direction. You have a map at each point of the manifold.
    $endgroup$
    – Giuseppe Negro
    Dec 5 '18 at 15:13










  • $begingroup$
    Yes my previous question arose from this question which at first made me think we could define a parallel vector field on any open set. In terms of semantics, DoCarmo’s wording in the translated version of his book is wrong.
    $endgroup$
    – User12239
    Dec 5 '18 at 15:23


















  • $begingroup$
    This is the natural follow-up to your previous question. In that case, the Riemann curvature tensor field is the map that describes what happens to a vector if you parallel transport around a loop. That map needs have three inputs: the vector, the shooting direction, the receiving direction. You have a map at each point of the manifold.
    $endgroup$
    – Giuseppe Negro
    Dec 5 '18 at 15:13










  • $begingroup$
    Yes my previous question arose from this question which at first made me think we could define a parallel vector field on any open set. In terms of semantics, DoCarmo’s wording in the translated version of his book is wrong.
    $endgroup$
    – User12239
    Dec 5 '18 at 15:23
















$begingroup$
This is the natural follow-up to your previous question. In that case, the Riemann curvature tensor field is the map that describes what happens to a vector if you parallel transport around a loop. That map needs have three inputs: the vector, the shooting direction, the receiving direction. You have a map at each point of the manifold.
$endgroup$
– Giuseppe Negro
Dec 5 '18 at 15:13




$begingroup$
This is the natural follow-up to your previous question. In that case, the Riemann curvature tensor field is the map that describes what happens to a vector if you parallel transport around a loop. That map needs have three inputs: the vector, the shooting direction, the receiving direction. You have a map at each point of the manifold.
$endgroup$
– Giuseppe Negro
Dec 5 '18 at 15:13












$begingroup$
Yes my previous question arose from this question which at first made me think we could define a parallel vector field on any open set. In terms of semantics, DoCarmo’s wording in the translated version of his book is wrong.
$endgroup$
– User12239
Dec 5 '18 at 15:23




$begingroup$
Yes my previous question arose from this question which at first made me think we could define a parallel vector field on any open set. In terms of semantics, DoCarmo’s wording in the translated version of his book is wrong.
$endgroup$
– User12239
Dec 5 '18 at 15:23










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

Such fields do not exist on general neighborhoods of a point $p$ (since for example the whole manifold is a neighborhood of $p$). But for sufficiently small neighborhoods they do exist as the example of the coordinate vector fields of a chart containing $p$ shows.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3027180%2fon-the-notion-of-tensor-in-riemannian-geometry%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1












    $begingroup$

    Such fields do not exist on general neighborhoods of a point $p$ (since for example the whole manifold is a neighborhood of $p$). But for sufficiently small neighborhoods they do exist as the example of the coordinate vector fields of a chart containing $p$ shows.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      1












      $begingroup$

      Such fields do not exist on general neighborhoods of a point $p$ (since for example the whole manifold is a neighborhood of $p$). But for sufficiently small neighborhoods they do exist as the example of the coordinate vector fields of a chart containing $p$ shows.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        1












        1








        1





        $begingroup$

        Such fields do not exist on general neighborhoods of a point $p$ (since for example the whole manifold is a neighborhood of $p$). But for sufficiently small neighborhoods they do exist as the example of the coordinate vector fields of a chart containing $p$ shows.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        Such fields do not exist on general neighborhoods of a point $p$ (since for example the whole manifold is a neighborhood of $p$). But for sufficiently small neighborhoods they do exist as the example of the coordinate vector fields of a chart containing $p$ shows.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Dec 5 '18 at 15:18









        Andreas CapAndreas Cap

        11.1k923




        11.1k923






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3027180%2fon-the-notion-of-tensor-in-riemannian-geometry%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Ellipse (mathématiques)

            Quarter-circle Tiles

            Mont Emei