On the notion of tensor in Riemannian Geometry
$begingroup$
In DoCarmo’s Riemannian Geometry, a tensor of order $r$ on a Riemannian manifold is defined as a multilinear mapping $$T:Xi^r(M)rightarrow C^{infty}(M)$$
where $M$ is a smooth manifold of dimension $n$, $Xi(M)$ denotes the module of smooth vector fields on $C^{infty}(M)$.
DoCarmo wants to show that $T$ is a pointwise object in the following sense: “Fix a point $pin M$ and let $U$ be a neighborhood of $p$ in $M$ on which it is possible to define vector fields $E_1,...,E_nin Xi(M)$, in such a fashion that at each $qin U$, the vectors ${E_i(q)}$,$i=1,...,n$, form a basis of $T_qM$. ...”
Does the author mean that for each neighborhood of $p$ there exists such vector fields, or what? If so, how can one define such vector fields?
riemannian-geometry smooth-manifolds vector-fields
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In DoCarmo’s Riemannian Geometry, a tensor of order $r$ on a Riemannian manifold is defined as a multilinear mapping $$T:Xi^r(M)rightarrow C^{infty}(M)$$
where $M$ is a smooth manifold of dimension $n$, $Xi(M)$ denotes the module of smooth vector fields on $C^{infty}(M)$.
DoCarmo wants to show that $T$ is a pointwise object in the following sense: “Fix a point $pin M$ and let $U$ be a neighborhood of $p$ in $M$ on which it is possible to define vector fields $E_1,...,E_nin Xi(M)$, in such a fashion that at each $qin U$, the vectors ${E_i(q)}$,$i=1,...,n$, form a basis of $T_qM$. ...”
Does the author mean that for each neighborhood of $p$ there exists such vector fields, or what? If so, how can one define such vector fields?
riemannian-geometry smooth-manifolds vector-fields
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
This is the natural follow-up to your previous question. In that case, the Riemann curvature tensor field is the map that describes what happens to a vector if you parallel transport around a loop. That map needs have three inputs: the vector, the shooting direction, the receiving direction. You have a map at each point of the manifold.
$endgroup$
– Giuseppe Negro
Dec 5 '18 at 15:13
$begingroup$
Yes my previous question arose from this question which at first made me think we could define a parallel vector field on any open set. In terms of semantics, DoCarmo’s wording in the translated version of his book is wrong.
$endgroup$
– User12239
Dec 5 '18 at 15:23
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In DoCarmo’s Riemannian Geometry, a tensor of order $r$ on a Riemannian manifold is defined as a multilinear mapping $$T:Xi^r(M)rightarrow C^{infty}(M)$$
where $M$ is a smooth manifold of dimension $n$, $Xi(M)$ denotes the module of smooth vector fields on $C^{infty}(M)$.
DoCarmo wants to show that $T$ is a pointwise object in the following sense: “Fix a point $pin M$ and let $U$ be a neighborhood of $p$ in $M$ on which it is possible to define vector fields $E_1,...,E_nin Xi(M)$, in such a fashion that at each $qin U$, the vectors ${E_i(q)}$,$i=1,...,n$, form a basis of $T_qM$. ...”
Does the author mean that for each neighborhood of $p$ there exists such vector fields, or what? If so, how can one define such vector fields?
riemannian-geometry smooth-manifolds vector-fields
$endgroup$
In DoCarmo’s Riemannian Geometry, a tensor of order $r$ on a Riemannian manifold is defined as a multilinear mapping $$T:Xi^r(M)rightarrow C^{infty}(M)$$
where $M$ is a smooth manifold of dimension $n$, $Xi(M)$ denotes the module of smooth vector fields on $C^{infty}(M)$.
DoCarmo wants to show that $T$ is a pointwise object in the following sense: “Fix a point $pin M$ and let $U$ be a neighborhood of $p$ in $M$ on which it is possible to define vector fields $E_1,...,E_nin Xi(M)$, in such a fashion that at each $qin U$, the vectors ${E_i(q)}$,$i=1,...,n$, form a basis of $T_qM$. ...”
Does the author mean that for each neighborhood of $p$ there exists such vector fields, or what? If so, how can one define such vector fields?
riemannian-geometry smooth-manifolds vector-fields
riemannian-geometry smooth-manifolds vector-fields
edited Dec 5 '18 at 17:54
User12239
asked Dec 5 '18 at 15:09
User12239User12239
441216
441216
$begingroup$
This is the natural follow-up to your previous question. In that case, the Riemann curvature tensor field is the map that describes what happens to a vector if you parallel transport around a loop. That map needs have three inputs: the vector, the shooting direction, the receiving direction. You have a map at each point of the manifold.
$endgroup$
– Giuseppe Negro
Dec 5 '18 at 15:13
$begingroup$
Yes my previous question arose from this question which at first made me think we could define a parallel vector field on any open set. In terms of semantics, DoCarmo’s wording in the translated version of his book is wrong.
$endgroup$
– User12239
Dec 5 '18 at 15:23
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This is the natural follow-up to your previous question. In that case, the Riemann curvature tensor field is the map that describes what happens to a vector if you parallel transport around a loop. That map needs have three inputs: the vector, the shooting direction, the receiving direction. You have a map at each point of the manifold.
$endgroup$
– Giuseppe Negro
Dec 5 '18 at 15:13
$begingroup$
Yes my previous question arose from this question which at first made me think we could define a parallel vector field on any open set. In terms of semantics, DoCarmo’s wording in the translated version of his book is wrong.
$endgroup$
– User12239
Dec 5 '18 at 15:23
$begingroup$
This is the natural follow-up to your previous question. In that case, the Riemann curvature tensor field is the map that describes what happens to a vector if you parallel transport around a loop. That map needs have three inputs: the vector, the shooting direction, the receiving direction. You have a map at each point of the manifold.
$endgroup$
– Giuseppe Negro
Dec 5 '18 at 15:13
$begingroup$
This is the natural follow-up to your previous question. In that case, the Riemann curvature tensor field is the map that describes what happens to a vector if you parallel transport around a loop. That map needs have three inputs: the vector, the shooting direction, the receiving direction. You have a map at each point of the manifold.
$endgroup$
– Giuseppe Negro
Dec 5 '18 at 15:13
$begingroup$
Yes my previous question arose from this question which at first made me think we could define a parallel vector field on any open set. In terms of semantics, DoCarmo’s wording in the translated version of his book is wrong.
$endgroup$
– User12239
Dec 5 '18 at 15:23
$begingroup$
Yes my previous question arose from this question which at first made me think we could define a parallel vector field on any open set. In terms of semantics, DoCarmo’s wording in the translated version of his book is wrong.
$endgroup$
– User12239
Dec 5 '18 at 15:23
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Such fields do not exist on general neighborhoods of a point $p$ (since for example the whole manifold is a neighborhood of $p$). But for sufficiently small neighborhoods they do exist as the example of the coordinate vector fields of a chart containing $p$ shows.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3027180%2fon-the-notion-of-tensor-in-riemannian-geometry%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Such fields do not exist on general neighborhoods of a point $p$ (since for example the whole manifold is a neighborhood of $p$). But for sufficiently small neighborhoods they do exist as the example of the coordinate vector fields of a chart containing $p$ shows.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Such fields do not exist on general neighborhoods of a point $p$ (since for example the whole manifold is a neighborhood of $p$). But for sufficiently small neighborhoods they do exist as the example of the coordinate vector fields of a chart containing $p$ shows.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Such fields do not exist on general neighborhoods of a point $p$ (since for example the whole manifold is a neighborhood of $p$). But for sufficiently small neighborhoods they do exist as the example of the coordinate vector fields of a chart containing $p$ shows.
$endgroup$
Such fields do not exist on general neighborhoods of a point $p$ (since for example the whole manifold is a neighborhood of $p$). But for sufficiently small neighborhoods they do exist as the example of the coordinate vector fields of a chart containing $p$ shows.
answered Dec 5 '18 at 15:18
Andreas CapAndreas Cap
11.1k923
11.1k923
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3027180%2fon-the-notion-of-tensor-in-riemannian-geometry%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
This is the natural follow-up to your previous question. In that case, the Riemann curvature tensor field is the map that describes what happens to a vector if you parallel transport around a loop. That map needs have three inputs: the vector, the shooting direction, the receiving direction. You have a map at each point of the manifold.
$endgroup$
– Giuseppe Negro
Dec 5 '18 at 15:13
$begingroup$
Yes my previous question arose from this question which at first made me think we could define a parallel vector field on any open set. In terms of semantics, DoCarmo’s wording in the translated version of his book is wrong.
$endgroup$
– User12239
Dec 5 '18 at 15:23